Comments

The Israeli Murders in DC were Staged https://mileswmathis.com/elias.pdf

And still, someone thought it was important to present a fetching brunette with nice legs and carefully presented cleavage to read information that she clearly is not familiar with in order to engage her probably older male target audience. So what is the message here exactly? The CIA fucks with your mind? Yeah - I think people already know that. And here they are using the sexuality hook to do it again.

WE KNOW WHO THE TERRORISTS ARE ...

Bunch of jibberish, the one fool is wearing a Saturn qube atop high head, look out foolish worldly Christians, I’m sure this is what your savior Trump supports too.

I guess the book referred to in the video might be a place to start.

I do wish that more LED lamps would be produced with diffusers. Those unfiltered LED streetlights that practically blind you on the road nowadays cannot be good for anybody.

Could you point me to any study or data comparing artificial incandescent lighting to any modern LED lighting? Incandescent lights (that typically consume 30-100W) emit the full spectrum of visible lights (for the most part). This includes the wavelengths emitted by LEDs, which use such infinitesimally small amounts of electricity that they have to be heavily resisted in order to not instantly blow out. Remember when fluorescent lights were going to kill everybody? Are incandescent lights “safe”, or should people be using candles? Of course, those produce fumes. So, maybe LEDs are truly harmful, but actual hard evidence with experimentation behind it would be welcome.

Great comment with an outstanding recommendation, Thanks.

Verifiable evidence? Careful cleansing for parasites. Some cleansing routines might be more harmful than the made up parasites, without actually identifying those parasite, nor what can cure them, if they exist.

I can’t prove anything one way or another here either, but it seems to be that health and nutrition appear to be the go-to’s for the average internet scammer. Everybody and their brother is trying to sell you on one unsubstantiated, unprovable nutrition scam or another. I get the feeling that the majority of YouTube ads are either health or nutrition scams or some idiot trying to sell a $2 flashlight or plastic magnifying glass for $100, masquerading as modern military tech. So little honest information or even advertised products these days. Maybe best to just eat a balanced diet, try to limit processed food, and don’t overthink things into the realm of what nobody really understands.

And just look into the chemistry of ozone and how that meshes with the “ozone layer” scam.

Of course, getting behind the router might involve finding a channel through an open port, but those can be scanned too: https://medium.com/@okanyildiz1994/mastering-the-top-25-network-ports-an-in-depth-guide-to-configuration-and-security-057812726f0c

I was really lucky to get my hands on box loads of old school incandescent lightbulbs, when my company was moving to another location. But I was already buying up these bulbs, beforehand from the internet. So I’ve been avoiding modern lights for many years now.

BTW: You can trick AI into telling you exactly how to hack into any number of systems, even if it tells you that its programming does not allow that. Also, a private internet router has an IP address that can be any of a large number of ###.###.###.### options. However, behind that will often be only XXX.XXX.XXX.###, or 1000 options, and one is generally taken up by the router admin program itself. One could scan for responses from 999 potential internal addresses in a fraction of a microsecond to see if there is a receptive vulnerability.

Correction: For the incredibly security-conscious MS OS, even the modern ones, it actually only really requires changing one file name,

Yep. all systems are hackable. Breaking into any Windows system, regardless of safeguards (other than total disk encryption) is as simple as booting off of an external drive and temporarily changing a couple of file names. Any system connected to the internet, regardless of OS or encryption, is no more safe than the code you allow to run on it, and web browsers run dynamic code all day long now, inside of your firewall. That’s why (presumably) 153news has limited options for dynamic encoding even in comments. SQL injections is not a particularly sophisticated technique by today’s standards, and the most effective way to avoid a corrupted database is to limit external coding options. A rootkit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit) can install itself in front of any OS and bypass all OS security functions. And now, all modern processors come with a pre-fabricated linux-based OS embedded directly into the chip that provides backdoor access to your government, and possibly manufacturing companies or billionaires who have payed for that access: https://www.networkworld.com/article/964650/minix-the-most-popular-os-in-the-world-thanks-to-intel.html, https://www.sysjolt.com/2021/every-modern-computer-has-a-backdoor/). Jason knows what he is talking about here. All systems are vulnerable, and once running, live memory is not encrypted at the execution level.

At this point I tend to agree. But modern propaganda, mainstream or “alternative” does not seem any more compelling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natamycin. Interesting. Anti-fungal drugs in cheese. I never knew. Some cheese depends upon fungi, but most cheese is produced by bacteria. I guess the problem with fungi spoiling commercial cheese production (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221479931930027X) has led some people to think that using anti-fungals is an economically viable idea. It probably is profitable, but natamycin consumption may not be without risk. Natamycin is a macrolide (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macrolide), and those can have some level of toxicity. At least some studies have concluded that it is safe (https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1412), but it’s also apparently been banned by at least a couple of outlets (https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/12/natamycin-safety-whole-foods-has-banned-it-but-what-does-the-science-say.html). When you get right down to it though: Fungi are eukaryotic, as opposed to prokaryotic (bacteria). Their cellular structures and biochemistry are more like humans than bacteria. If you can kill a fungus with a drug that does not kill bacteria, you probably have drug that has negative effects in humans. There really aren’t that many fundamental differences.

Impossible to determine, probably. SV40 is used to create “immortal” (i.e. cancer) cells in culture though. When it ends up in injected drugs and “vaccines”, there is certainly a risk.

Amen. Background music like that is probably intended to facilitate brain washing.