Comments

Every culture since "end times" became an issue, claimed to be living it.

The end of the world has been nigh since the Apocalypse came and went several times in the various locations of Armageddon. How many times have the “End TImes” already come and gone? Sure. One’s gonna stick. Is it now the ‘Red Heifer’ BS? Maybe. Messianic psychopaths have been at this for centuries. Eventually, the most mentally-ill, violent folks will probably kill their neighbors for no good reason after all.

“ I walked to Apollo by the bay. Everywhere I go, though - Eli’s a-comin”

“… and proven law of physics …”. Proven? I guess we’ve never yet been able to refute it in the eye-blink of our existence. Perhaps if a creative being created us, it was not “out of nothing”? Maybe that being had to already exist in “something”?

A universe from nothing? While in this universe we live with a major, and proven law of physics where Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. First Law of Thermodynamics (Conservation of Energy): Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it can only change forms. It underlines the principle that the total energy of an isolated system remains constant. These strictly science guys, will never admit to a creative being snapping its fingers, creating this ball of energy, "from nothing"

I saw this video recently; It’s par for the FE course. At this time the best evidence says that Organic beings and substances are not able to survive outside of earth’s magnetic field for even short periods, but soon enough it’ll be quite common, because of the increasing number mechanical contraptions that various countries are sending to the moon, along with their many cameras linked to Starlink, to send back true undeniable photos of Earth from many viewpoints. We’ll finally see the Earth in all its grand flatness, or we won’t. Eli’s coming, and very soon.

Perhaps he has no cause? Some people are more interested in what is true than their ‘cause’. Ridicule and insult is a poor substitute for knowledge.

“ You ridicule Flat Earth as anti-science …” Nah - just anti-observation. Just sit out all night a few times, watch the stars as they progress from east to west. Watch how they move relative to each other depending on where they are north to south. Then get on a plane and fly to Sydney or Buenos Aires and sit out overnight a couple of times. You should bring a sky map though. You won’t find a single star in common. Not one. Then watch how they move across the sky overnight. No models. No gadgets. Just watch the sky overnight.

There is a lot of good information posted on 153news. But the skittish are easily chased off by the ridiculous nonsense, hyperbole, and undocumented, untestable, and often flat out dishonest BS. Your echo chamber is extremely self-limiting and very few people throughout the world are likely to pay attention to such gibberish as presented in this video. They see it and then put it aside forever and say to themselves “Oh yeah, that ‘flat Earth site’ …”

In my opinion, he is correct in his portrayal of the colloquial use of the word “science” as a modern religion. But that is not the modern functional use of science any more than the Catholic Church or your favorite baptist denomination represents the practical value of your belief in God. Have you traveled outside your home town much? Have you met a lot of people from different cultures to help orient your view of things? Don Quixote and Richard Dawkins probably do believe in the concept of “God” in some sense. Otherwise he’s right - why fight against ‘him’? The point is, they feel that the God that they are “supposed” to accept is not a just and legitimate God, so they search for another amongst the infinity of potential ‘Gods’ or, if more constrained, amongst those already recognized by those you cannot refute (‘cuz Bible and reasons), i.e. the “Elohim”.

That’s kind of neat. Do they have a different one for Australia and South America? You’ve never been south of the equator (it’s an imaginary circle in between the pinpoint of the north pole and the infinite-diameter ice wall of the “south pole” (which can no longer be a “pole” I guess))? The stars are different once you cross the imaginary equator on the flat plane. You can’t see Polaris from Argentina or Chili. You have to align a telescope to a different area of the sky. You can’t see the Southern Cross from Northern (or Southern) U.S. Is there a giant black wall surrounding the flat Earth at the equator to block the sky view from the opposite “hemisphere”? Or are there two side-by side Earths with separate planetarium domes? And a secret tunnel for airplanes and boats?

This video is not really about the shape of the Earth, despite the label given by the poster, and despite the pancake Earth image used as an illustration. It is about the surrender of yourself and your soul to a control structure (such as a formal religion, government or “cult”) and the defense of that control structure to the detriment of yourself and others. “Flat Earth” is simply used as an example that is blatant and easy to grasp for most people due to its impenetrable rejection of all astronomical knowledge for >5000 years and its absurd departure from all physical observations since the Sumerians first recorded astronomical observations on physical media that has survived >5000 years. It’s about the general exploitation of ignorance and the willingness of the ignorant to be absorbed into essentially anything, and to fight for it, like a good soldier fights for his country without question, regardless of why. It’s about cult mentality in general. It’s about peer pressure. It’s about groupthink. It’s ultimately about power and control through identity, inclusion, shame and threat. Peoples’ mental “model” of the shape of the Earth is just an easy vehicle to try to deliver the point in a way that a majority of people who made it through high school can relate to.

Wigington makes a good point. The CEO is probably just a crisis actor to serve as diversion and take the focus off the real issue and perps. Maybe we’ll get some fake Alex Jones like Sandy Hook trials of the guy.

Is he dead or what happened with this legendary Jeff C? Do you know where I can see his work?

Yet G. Zimmerman was labeled as a white-hispanic!

A dozen 1000 year floods in 3 days https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3hCUnvEBPzo

BREAK CURFEW by Adam Lawson "Fuck Covid19" Music. - https://old.bitchute.com/video/suK6NpMWYQ8t/

REGARDING HOMOSEXUALITY , The NSDAP has been alternately accused by Zionist historians of both extreme homosexuality and extreme homophobia. This shows, if anything, that Jews and Gentiles – not Aryans – are the ones most hung up over sexual preferences. Any intelligent appraisal of Hitler’s political manouevres accounts for the alleged ”anti-homosexuality” of National Socialist Germany as solely a tactical excuse to deal with traitor Ernst Roehm and his faction. As a matter of fact, none of the anti-homosexual laws used to attack Roehm’s faction were instituted by the NSDAP, but all already existed during the Weimar era and earlier, whereas from 1935 onwards (the year after Roehm’s faction was dealt with) these laws began to be loosened, starting with removing the term “unnatural” from the official description of homosexuality. Homosexuals loyal to Hitler experienced no persecution, and many (e.g. Gustaf Grundgens) were promoted to high prestige. It is, however, also baseless to claim that Hitler actively preferred to recruit homosexuals; Roehm probably had such a preference, but Hitler simply kept those who were good National Socialists. Quality of character and strength of ideology in his followers were what mattered to Hitler, not their sexual preferences, in his own words: “What people do in their beds do not concern me so long as relationships do not prejudice the State and its leadership.” Formalization of sexual preferences into the tunnel-visioned classification of so-called “sexual orientation” is actually a dichotomy originating in Judaism via the explicit prohibition of same-gender sexual relations in Mosaic Law. Authentic National Socialism, which by definition seeks to de-Judaize culture, logically cannot subscribe to the Mosaic perspective, but opposes it. It is Judaism which should be held fundamentally responsible for the thousands of years of cruel homophobia from the time of Moses onwards wherever the Tanakh has been culturally influential, as well as for the postmodern overreaction of “gay pride” that has deliberately conflated homosexuality with promiscuity and debauchery (which is by no coincidence how the Tanakh negatively stereotyped homosexuals as a whole) and thus predictably revived homophobia in the 21st century, all part of the Zionist agenda to divide society. TOLERANCE YES < PROMOTION NO < THAT’S MY POSITION

THE META PUPPET SHOW < PUPPETS USING PUPPETS FOR THE PUPPETEERS ....LOL

You may argue as to whether or not he actually said it, and there are plenty of fact checker bots on Google (run by Jews) claiming he didn’t say it, however you have to be naive to say that the notion isn’t valid, it’s work in progress happening before your eyes, it happened during the Spanish American War, during the 1st World War when America was an isolationist country and did not want to get involved in foreign wars, it happened, with the attack on Pearl Harbor which they knew was coming and did nothing to prevent it as it started the ball rolling on the NWO, and in Vietnam with the false flag attack in the Gulf of Tonkin on the USS Maddox, I haven’t followed the history of the Korean war in depth, but the Iraq war and Afghanistan war were of the same nature, come-on boys were being attacked, gotta protect the homeland, and to add to that Kissinger added "Military men are dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.