Comments

Repeatable experimental factual evidence has been accrued for many hundreds of years to define relative motion and the effects of gravitational acceleration. Many of your arguments can be easily explained with simple examples shown in any good physics book. We can be on a spinning, rotating, translating earth through space and none of us would be the wiser. With that said. There was one thing I resonate with: Newton’s definition of Force. The equation for Force=mass*acceleration in a small unified coordinate system does actually work, but the the ’mass’ part is a bit of a leap of faith. In terms of the periodic table and the number of subatomic particles and density, mass can be quantified in a linear fashion. But, it does not explain the ’why’ that bigger particles have a bigger attraction to each other. To me, the ’they just do’ and ’it is an inherent feature of matter’ does not satisfy my quest for knowledge of this universe. And why do all other forces have attraction and repulsion but not gravitation? Einstein explained gravity in terms of the bending of space-time and ’wells’. This is a better explanation of the effect, but still no insight into the ’why’? Peace.

It is a word used in the book of Genesis in the Bible. How is it defined? How can anyone comment on a word used in one place with no definition? ’Splunge’ was a word used in a Mighty Python sketch to mean ’not yes or no but I am not being indecisive’.

I worked in the Mechanical side of aerospace in various places. I actually worked alongside the guy who was the head of Rocketdyne’s experimental division as chief toolmaker, during the 1960’s. I would have had many different questions for him, knowing what I know now. Thanks for sharing your information.

Why do I need to explain a term that has no definition?

Lol that explains all anyone needs to know about your views.

While I pursued my Masters in Computer Science, my focus was on graphics. Since I was in the Aerospace industry at the time, I had a keen interest in the ’projection models’ used to create a unified 2D flat map of all incoming sources including radar, ground, air, and satellite. Since all of these systems have relative coordinate systems with line of sight values, the coordination of the geodetic to ground relative positions becomes a major concern with over the horizon shared data. When systems are many miles apart, what is considered ’straight up’ is not the same because of earth curvature and the pictures of different identical systems do not align when shared because they have two ’tilted’ pictures with respect to each other. This is just common sense. There are computers that take all the skewed data from other sources and ’snap it’ into a unified coordinate system so that everyone in the group sees the same display.

Oh! Trump is going to be pissed at Zelenskyy for shooting missiles while talks are going on.

Ok I’ll tell you. That’s a term, or word, used in the book of Genisis in the bible, I hope that helped.

How do you explain the firmament?

Would be interesting to see an overlay map of military installations and basses nearby.

A very well-done and timely video. Unfortunately, not enough black Americans are speaking out, as this guy has. The black people involved in the summer of love 2020 and since then, have done a great disservice to American society and certainly no less to this honest fella. This guy has to suffer twice the average; he has to deal with knowing the truth about his own people along with having to personally suffer the consequences of their foolishness.

Flat earth model is basing all its conclusions on a map that is a squashed map of a globe. Analogy would be throwing water melon from a high-rise building and then using what is left on the pavement as a model for a "true" water melon. The Gleason map is azimuthal equidistant [AE] projection of a globe [flattened globe] His’ patent says so: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bwtmqy4oHCI Gleason’s TIme-Chart patent: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/78/e3/25/543575d285be1a/US497917.pdf On page three he says this: "[...] The extorsion of the map from that of a globe consists, mainly in the straightening out of the meridian lines allowing each to retain their original value from Greenwich, the equator to the two poles. I claim as my invention. [...]". The words ... ’extorsion of the map from that of the globe’ ... tell you what his patented technique is all about. The meaning of the word ’extorsion’ is explained by Merriam-Webster dictionary: "EXTORSION is outward rotation about an axis or fixed point.". Which is an action seen in the video I linked*. This extorsion technique of projecting a globe onto a flat plane - azimuthal equidistant projection - results in a flat circular map which retains relative distances between points on the globe ... or, as Gleason explains in his patent application: "[...] The map is not so extorted as to lose the relative latitude and longitude of any places on the land or sea, but retains all latitudes and longitudes of places agreeing with other recognized authors; and as the proper relations of continents and countries all stand in their relative position to each other. [...]". What is practical utility of this particular projection, a 2D extorsion (distortion) of a globe? Well ... it is essentially a time map, or as Gleason’s patent says ... a ’Time-Chart’: "[...] The utility of such computating map will be obvious, not only to the school child but for an adult or official person. [...]". --------------------------- * "Time-Chart" video compels me to complement it with a "Star Chart" video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3dlyBAp_uU The two videos make such a contrasting pair, the first video opens up and flattens the globe onto paper like a melon hitting concrete and the second one wraps the squished globe back into original form, so that both poles can share common axis mundi again. _______________________ PS And then there is a multi-problem with the Sun. How far is it and how many are there? It looks like there are as many stars needed in combination with as many stars’ distances as there are observing points to satisfy every observer position at the same time on a flattened globe that underwent 3D into 2D transformation by extorsion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EF6Ojo9fJhw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcctCQzTNow https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHHuxMVclX4 It seems that flattened globe model is a failure, which is actually good news since failure is the only way forward in science. Disproving models, or parts of them, and not proving them, is the productive way of expanding knowledge and learning new things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLJ_NvgVC8w

I often wonder what would happen when the peasants all storm the castle and find all the documentation of all the lies we have been fed for decades? What would Joe Average do afterwards? He would have to consider that all the thoughts inside his head are all mostly wrong. 12 years of indoctrination and bullshit memorization all completely full of it. Voting is pointless. All the politicians are actors and the real owners of earth are completely unknown and untouchable. You have no real freedoms. All illusion. Now what?

Yeah, That one was hard to watch, the oldest trick in the book is to blame others for doing what you are doing.

I was talking to one of my sons on the phone a minute ago, and what I heard from him, reflects your comment perfectly. Thanks

The hard part about using logic, reasoning, and factually based evidence is that it cannot beat faith. Faith is belief without proof: defn. Even if the world is shaped like a banana and the solar system is a hologram, the current model we have predicts every aspect of it. It does not matter what system model you believe if it doesn’t solve basic physics because you can’t use it for anything other than to support your own belief system.

HEY! Wait a minute, that’s far too logical thinking and that’s not allowed in today’s society! Your supposed to be dogmatically on one side and NOT the other. Such comments disrupt the cosmic flow of the round/flat, creator/atheist universe. I fear a rip in the space-time continuum because of your errant comment. Goodbye cruel world!

Why do you need a model that trumps your observation ability? A model is a model. Reality is the best observation. The spinning globe in all these classrooms really did a doozie on critical thinking. The older generation always seem to stick to their programming. A model is simply a theory unless it can be proven. And in this day and age nobody will be able to prove anything. It’s all controlled by the opposition.

"Israel doesn’t target civilians." And dogs don’t get fleas. Another brilliant show. Thank you Gary and Jim.

I am all for evidence brotherman. But when it comes to are we on a spinning ball hurling around the sun year after year, there isn’t a single part of the evidence that would lead me to believe that. People have all these excuses as to why a plane doesn’t have to aim down when flying, or why they can take off going against the direction of the Earth’s supposed rotation, or why hovering in a hot air balloon can’t take us from NY to California or why the opposite would have you never making it there. Why do we have perfectly clear lakes with no ripples and why do we have a word for magic called gravity. When a bee can lift off and a hummingbird stay in the same place why doesn’t this gravity effect them. Why does it appear that the heavier you are the more you are held down and the birds with hollow bones can float away. Why have we never felt a bump or be knocked to the ground with any of these thousands of miles an hour or circling in one direction and flying around in another direction. Why is there no curve according to their 8 inches squared math they give us. Why does Iowa have miles and miles of flat lands that you can observe zero curve. The list goes on and on. So all these freemasons that give you complex mathematics to achieve some belief when you have God given perception. You have to believe in a fairy tale to come up with the round earth theory. So it’s not confirmation bias it’s simple logic for me. Now I couldn’t tell you what shape we actually are because I am sure the maps have all been screwed with as well but we certainly aren’t moving and wobbling to and fro in space.