Comments

A Party member is expected to have no private emotions and no respites from enthusiasm He is supposed to live in a continuous frenzy of hatred of foreign enemies and internal traitors, triumph over victories, and self-abasement before the power and wisdom of the Party. The discontents produced by his bare, unsatisfying life are deliberately turned outwards [...] and the speculations which might possibly induce a sceptical or rebellious attitude are killed in advance by his early acquired inner discipline. The first and simplest stage in the discipline, which can be taught even to young children, is called, in Newspeak, CRIMESTOP. [...]rnCRIMESTOP means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments [...] and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. CRIMESTOP, in short, means protective stupidity. But stupidity is not enough. On the contrary, orthodoxy in the full sense demands a control over one’s own mental processes as complete as that of a contortionist over his body. Oceanic society rests ultimately on the belief that Big Brother is omnipotent and that the Party is infallible. But since in reality Big Brother is not omnipotent and the party is not infallible, there is need for an unwearying, moment-to-moment flexibility in the treatment of facts. The keyword here is BLACKWHITE. Like so many Newspeak words, this word has two mutually contradictory meanings. Applied to an opponent, it means the habit of impudently claiming that black is white, in contradiction of the plain facts. Applied to a Party member, it means a loyal willingness to say that black is white when Party discipline demands this. But it means also the ability to BELIEVE that black is white, and more, to KNOW that black is white, and to forget that one has ever believed the contrary. This demands a continuous alteration of the past, made possible by the system of thought which really embraces all the rest, and which is known in Newspeak as DOUBLETHINK. [...]rnThe alteration of the past is necessary for two reasons, one of which is subsidiary and, so to speak, precautionary. The subsidiary reason is that the Party member, like the proletarian, tolerates present-day conditions partly because he has no standards of comparison. He must be cut off from the past, just as he must be cut off from foreign countries, because it is necessary for him to believe that he is better off than his ancestors and that the average level of material comfort is constantly rising. But by far the more important reason for the readjustment of the past is the need to safeguard the infallibility of the Party. It is not merely that speeches, statistics, and records of every kind must be constantly brought up to date in order to show that the predictions of the Party were in all cases right. It is also that no change in doctrine or in political alignment can ever be admitted. For to change one’s mind, or even one’s policy, is a confession of weakness. [...] If, for example, Eurasia or Eastasia (whichever it may be) is the enemy today, then that country must always have been the enemy. And if the facts say otherwise then the facts must be altered. Thus history is continuously rewritten. This day-to-day falsification of the past, carried out by the Ministry of Truth, is as necessary to the stability of the regime as the work of repression and espionage carried out by the Ministry of Love. [...]

Bro, people don’t like you because your a jackass that tosses everyone in your bag of shit as you say I told you so. Nobody gives a fuck about your sighing opinions over and over and over. You are bitter because you are unhappy with your life and if everyone isn’t eating the right way they are trash. If you weren’t such a dirt bag, many more people would listen to you. And dump the 33 spiderman flipping the devil’s horns at us. That’s a very disturbing thing about you. Can you fix that plank before you keep bashing the splinters out of wide awake people standing beside you, not against you.

In principle, membership of these three groups is not hereditary. The child of Inner Party parents is in theory not born into the Inner Party. Admission to either branch of the Party is by examination, taken at the age of sixteen. Nor is there any racial discrimination, or any marked domination of one province by another. Jews, Negroes, South Americans of pure Indian blood are to be found in the highest ranks of the Party, and the administrators of any area are always drawn from the inhabitants of that area. In no part of Oceania do the inhabitants have the feeling that they are a colonial population ruled from a distant capital. [...] Its rulers are not held together by blood-ties but by adherence to a common doctrine. It is true that our society is stratified, and very rigidly stratified, on what at first sight appear to be hereditary lines. [...] Between the two branches of the Party there is a certain amount of interchange, but only so much as will ensure that weaklings are excluded from the Inner Party and that ambitious members of the Outer Party are made harmless by allowing them to rise. Proletarians, in practice, are not allowed to graduate into the Party.[...] But this state of affairs is not necessarily permanent, nor is it a matter of principle. The Party is not a class in the old sense of the word. It does not aim at transmitting power to its own children, as such; and if there were no other way of keeping the ablest people at the top, it would be perfectly prepared to recruit an entire new generation from the ranks of the proletariat. In the crucial years, the fact that the Party was not a hereditary body did a great deal to neutralize opposition. [...] The essence of oligarchical rule is not father-to-son inheritance, but the persistence of a certain world-view and a certain way of life, imposed by the dead upon the living. A ruling group is a ruling group so long as it can nominate its successors. The Party is not concerned with perpetuating its blood but with perpetuating itself. WHO wields power is not important, provided that the hierarchical structure remains always the same. [...]rnAll the beliefs, habits, tastes, emotions, mental attitudes that characterize our time are really designed to sustain the mystique of the Party and prevent the true nature of present-day society from being perceived. Physical rebellion, or any preliminary move towards rebellion, is at present not possible. From the proletarians nothing is to be feared. Left to themselves, they will continue from generation to generation and from century to century, working, breeding, and dying, not only without any impulse to rebel, but without the power of grasping that the world could be other than it is. They could only become dangerous if the advance of industrial technique made it necessary to educate them more highly; [...] What opinions the masses hold, or do not hold, is looked on as a matter of indifference. They can be granted intellectual liberty because they have no intellect. In a Party member, on the other hand, not even the smallest deviation of opinion on the most important subject can be tolerated. [...] Nothing that he does is indifferent. His friendships, his relaxations, his behaviour towards his wife and children, the expression of his face when he is alone, the words he mutters in sleep, even the characteristic movements of his body, are all jealously scrutinized. Not only any actual misdemeanour, but any eccentricity, however small, any change of habits, any nervous mannerism that could possibly be the symptom of an inner struggle, is certain to be detected. He has no freedom of choice in any direction whatever. On the other hand his actions are not regulated by law or by any clearly formulated code of behaviour. [...] A Party member is required to have not only the right opinions, but the right instincts. Many of the beliefs and attitudes demanded of him are never plainly stated, and could not be stated without laying bare the contradictions [...]. If he is a person naturally orthodox (in Newspeak a GOODTHINKER), he will in all circumstances know, without taking thought, what is the true belief or the desirable emotion. But in any case an elaborate mental training, undergone in childhood and grouping itself round the Newspeak words CRIMESTOP, BLACKWHITE, and DOUBLETHINK, makes him unwilling and unable to think too deeply on any subject whatever. [...]

THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF OLIGARCHICAL COLLECTIVISM by Emmanuel GoldsteinrnrnChapter I - Ignorance is StrengthrnrnIn his capacity as an administrator, it is often necessary for a member of the Inner Party to know that this or that item of war news is untruthful, and he may often be aware that the entire war is spurious and is either not happening or is being waged for purposes quite other than the declared ones: but such knowledge is easily neutralized by the technique of DOUBLETHINK. Meanwhile no Inner Party member wavers for an instant in his mystical belief that the war is real, and that it is bound to end victoriously, [...]rnWhat kind of people would control this world had been equally obvious. The new aristocracy was made up for the most part of bureaucrats, scientists, technicians, trade-union organizers, publicity experts, sociologists, teachers, journalists, and professional politicians. These people, whose origins lay in the salaried middle class and the upper grades of the working class, had been shaped and brought together by the barren world of monopoly industry and centralized government. As compared with their opposite numbers in past ages, they were less avaricious, less tempted by luxury, hungrier for pure power, and, above all, more conscious of what they were doing and more intent on crushing opposition. This last difference was cardinal. By comparison with that existing today, all the tyrannies of the past were half-hearted and inefficient. [...] But the new High group, unlike all its forerunners, did not act upon instinct but knew what was needed to safeguard its position. [...]rnBut the problems of perpetuating a hierarchical society go deeper than this. There are only four ways in which a ruling group can fall from power. Either it is conquered from without, or it governs so inefficiently that the masses are stirred to revolt, or it allows a strong and discontented Middle group to come into being, or it loses its own self-confidence and willingness to govern. These causes do not operate singly, and as a rule all four of them are present in some degree. A ruling class which could guard against all of them would remain in power permanently. Ultimately the determining factor is the mental attitude of the ruling class itself. [...] After the middle of the present century,the first danger had in reality disappeared. [...] The second danger, also, is only a theoretical one. The masses never revolt of their own accord, and they never revolt merely because they are oppressed. Indeed, so long as they are not permitted to have standards of comparison, they never even become aware that they are oppressed. The recurrent economic crises of past times were totally unnecessary, [...] but other and equally large dislocations can and do happen without having political results, because there is no way in which discontent can become articulate. As for the problem of over-production, which has been latent in our society since the development of machine technique, it is solved by the device of continuous warfare [...], which is also useful in keying up public morale to the necessary pitch. From the point of view of our present rulers, therefore, the only genuine dangers are the splitting-off of a new group of able, under-employed, power-hungry people, and the growth of liberalism and scepticism in their own ranks. The problem, that is to say, is educational. It is a problem of continuously moulding the consciousness both of the directing group and of the larger executive group that lies immediately below it. The consciousness of the masses needs only to be influenced in a negative way. [...]rnGiven this background, one could infer, if one did not know it already, the general structure of Oceanic society. At the apex of the pyramid comes Big Brother. Big Brother is infallible and all-powerful. Every success, every achievement, every victory, every scientific discovery, all knowledge, all wisdom, all happiness, all virtue, are held to issue directly from his leadership and inspiration.. [...] He is a face on the hoardings, a voice on the telescreen. We may be reasonably sure that he will never die, and there is already considerable uncertainty as to when he was born. Big Brother is the guise in which the Party chooses to exhibit itself to the world. His function is to act as a focusing point for love, fear, and reverence, emotions which are more easily felt towards an individual than towards an organization. Below Big Brother comes the Inner Party. Its numbers limited to six millions, or something less than 2 percent of the population of Oceania. Below the Inner Party comes the Outer Party, which, if the Inner Party is described as the brain of the State, may be justly likened to the hands. Below that come the dumb masses whom we habitually refer to as ‘the proles’, numbering perhaps 85 per cent of the population. [...] the proles are the Low.[...]

Media-Intelligence complex as a prototype ’Inner Party’; Trump as a prototype ’Big Brother’; and Vance as a prototype ’O’Brien’ (party apparatchik) Question remains open: am I, are you, a prototype Winston? The rest (voters) seem to have chosen to play the role of prototype ’proles’. It is opportune moment to look at what is the essence of Trump/Vance future leadership push that is being hoisted on US political scene right now, what is continuously force-fed through media ’telescreen’ for people to swallow. To see what the "Inner Party" (deep state if you want) is really doing with the duo. We have been warned by Orwell this is the trajectory that is supposed to be realized all over the world. Uni-polar world is being dismantled and, as planned over a century ago, Multi-polar world is to replace it. The US is the last one to join other super-states, by becoming a "socialistic" state. Weather through masterful manipulation or by means of civil war remains to be seen, but what is already obvious is the fact that the leaders are already going through testing phase for the upcoming "socialistic" system. Socialistic in name only, of course. It will be meritory oligarchy just like all the other super-states of this world (Europe, Russia, China, India), and future leaders of the US ’Inner Party’ are already being prototyped and tested by the Media-Intelligence complex. In other words, the idea of multi-polar world as an alternative to uni-polar hegemony is a fake solution. I will let Orwell speak - actually it will be Inner Party’s creation, an illusory opposition leader Emmanuel Goldstein speaking - about Big Brother’s capstone function (I see Trump’s role being tested on the public’s perception as a prototype role for this fictional character) and about Inner Party’s required mental setup (I see Vance’s role, as demonstrator of flip-flop technique, being tested as a prototype role for future deep state’s wielders of power). It is lengthy, but necessary, I think, to remind you what had been planned long ago, and is to be unleashed eventually upon the whole world (US included) by the elites, as the US ’proles’ reactions are being monitored closely under the guise of current electoral procedure. What flavor of counterfeit "reality" are people willing to accept as consensual basis of their counterfeit reality (political or otherwise) which might become a template for many millennia to come. It is down to the rest of the people now. Will the people of the US go down the "socialistic" path by choosing the (wrong) door number two dangled in front of their eyes by prototype characters as an alternative to uni-polar world of fatigued hegemonic despots (drooling Rockefellers/Schwabs), will the people choose the lesser of the two evils (multi-polar) just to get along, or will they be able to stand their ground, finally after few millennia of exploitation, and reject both con-jobs (uni- and multi-polar world) and with that all the "candidates" paraded on their flickering screens? There is the door number 3, the path of individuality, and no, I don’t suggest yet another deceiving actor of the ’Inner Party’, who was promising total digital chaining

And this is surprising to who?

There were two primary actors for the POTUS election movie this year. This was a complete repeat of 2016, where all the freaks and the brainwashed rooted for the commie and most of everyone else rooted for the nationalists - it was a great show. In 2016 he was going to ’lock her up’. In 2024, they are going to ’lock him up’ (pick your favorite mass murderer). In 2017 ’she’ did not get locked up and attended his inauguration. What do you think will happen in 2025? It is a show, a play, a movie, ..., none of it is real. Getting upset over it is basically like writing a bad movie review...it does nothing to change the opinions of others or the movie.

Here’s one for Jim... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1el8A6FQ3A

In 2016 Trump vs Hillary was like Andre vs Hogan at Wrestlemania 3. Hillary had been built up for decades as the evil unstoppable bad guy. This one is lame. Its like Hogan vs some jobber. Camelface was a nobody until 4 years ago when they made her VP. And they kept her off TV the whole time because she’s so unlikable. Then they bring her out to take on Trumpamania. Come on. rnrnWatching liberal tiktok cry videos has no enjoyment like it did in 2016. No good reporters crying this time either like when Hillary lost. 2016 there’s a little bit of hope Trump will be anti-establishment like he was campaigning on. Now in 2024 we know what he is and yet he’s still more likable than his opponent. Fun times.

Stop Prepping! Civil War Averted! WW3 Cancelled! Economy Fixed! Everything Is Perfect! USA! USA! USA!

Whatever their plans are for Trump, one very important move the right made was getting Musk on board. Who better than Musk for getting digital ID and introducing the AI Governance.

I’ve thought for along time that Trump would bring the USA into complete domination of the NWO thru Chaos and that when the USA finally woke up to the communist takeover of their country it would be to put their stamp of approval on right wing violence to stop it To me Trumps reelection looks like we are at the point where the real chaos begins

It is my understanding some of those bump stock and reset triggers have been thrown out by the Supreme Court saying the ATF cannot change the law as to what has already been an established definition as to what fully and semi automatic firearms are.

He already instituted red flag laws in 2019 and a bump stock ban. So he’s off to a good start.

Such a lying MF. It’ will be the "golden age of Israhell".

Surprising also? Maybe not. Lutnick is also CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald. The company has hosted a healthcare conference. https://www.cantor.com/conference/global-healthcare-conference-2023/

As I stated it’s a long way to inauguration day anything can happen between now and then, I do not trust that DJT will not try to pull off another fake assassination attempt or some other false flag. The Herding Humanity Channel lays out some possible scenarios that could take place, I don’t have enough data to post the video myself but here is the link. https://youtu.be/sDLblGt4BVg?si=f1k8YNpBK6PZ9yZK

I highly doubt any president took the poisonous jab though...especially when they are ones pushing it .Faucci made a boat load off the scam....as with the politicians that were behind it..the money trail points to the CDC, John’s Hopkins and the patent holders..both sides of the spectrum are Zionists doesn’t matter what puppet’s in power.

I’m Searching for the other warnings.

2 weeks ago