Comments

In the 60s the "v" sign used to mean peace in opposition to Vietnam....Makes one wonder if that was really its initial intent ! But yup My 1st impression of all the so casual police and students was very mind boggling to say the least...And was taken right out of the Sandyhoax play book!...that actor that said he lives in an area where " school shootings and drills are common"...wow....also they don’t really distinguish if this occurs indoors or outside the school...The deputies gun was not locked up ...okay...and where did the shot gun come from?...and he just walked right through the main entrance without being noticed with a shot gun?...lmfao...I am not ever convinced at least in the US that there was ever a mass school shooting at all...

HU-MAN Interesting how Wikipedia obscures the explanation, going into explanations about homo sapiens and repeatedly pointing out that humans are animals, humans are apes. In etymology section it briefly touches that the word "Human is a loanword of Middle English from Old French humain, ultimately from Latin hūmānus, the adjectival form of homō (’man’ — in the sense of humanity)." But it skips over the fact that it is a composite word and stops with the explanation for the MAN part while "neglecting" to proceed with explanation for the HU part. So what do other etymology sites tell us? https://www.etymonline.com/word/human Etymonline, as one of many sites, tells us that "[...] This is in part from PIE [Proto Indo-European] *(dh)ghomon-, literally "earthling, earthly being," as opposed to the gods (from root *dhghem- "earth"), but there is no settled explanation of the sound changes involved. Compare Hebrew adam "man," from adamah "ground.". So we see that there is some uncertainty. But we are pointed in direction that human is earthling, ground being, coming out of dirt, when compared with gods. Another site, Symbol Genie, https://symbolgenie.com/origin-of-the-word-human/ tells us more, by pointing out "[...] The word “human” has its roots in the Latin word “humanus,” which means “of or belonging to man. [...] This root is also associated with other words related to the earth, such as “humus” (soil) and “humble” (from humilis, meaning low or close to the ground). [...] In its earliest usage, the word “human” was often used to differentiate humans from gods or other mythical beings. It represented the mortal aspect of existence and the inherent limitations of being human.". So hu-mans belong to ’Men’. Which bags the question whether these "Men" are those gods that humans were being compared with couple of paragraphs earlier. Are ’Men’ master-gods and humans their slave property? I doubt the definition that human etymology as sea monster is valid, since, though it is mentioned in Ballentine’s Law Dictionary from 1948, it has circular reasoning: human ... is sea monster ... and monster .... is human being. The article below explores legal definitions of the term ’human being’ in a systematic way and begins by asking the question "To Be or Not To Be a Human Being?" https://www.1215.org/lawnotes/work-in-progress/humanbeing.htm "[...] With ’natural man’ being the same as ’natural person’, we find further evidence of exactly what a ’human being’ is. [...] 1. not regenerate; unrepentant. 2. unconvinced by or unconverted to a particular religion, sect, or movement. 4. wicked; sinful; dissolute. 5. an unregenerate person. [...] In conjunction with this ... ’naturalism’ is defined as ’a system of morality or religion having a purely natural basis; a view of the world, and of man’s relationship to it, in which only the operation of natural, as opposed to supernatural or spiritual, laws and forces is assumed’ and ’naturalist’ is defined as ’One who follows the light of nature, as contrasted with revelation’. [...] Therefore, when a Christian calls him or herself a ’human being’, they are saying, "I’m an animal; I’m non-religious; I’m unrepentant: I’m wicked, sinful and dissolute; I’m able to do all things and be perfect without Jesus Christ; I’m subject to man’s law, rather than God’s Law.". -------- From all this a question forms in my mind: What is meant by the word ’man’ in the Bible? "So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and every creature that crawls upon the earth.”. If the Man, the male and the female, are created in god’s image to subdue life on the planet, next question is: Then who are Adam , the first human on the planet, and Eve - the even lesser version of human, a knock-down copy/paste version of Adam - and do the generations of their children belong to ’Man’ in perpetuity? And where to find the Male and the Female who were created in the image of god?

I wouldn’t be removing every single word from common parlance just because some crazy law-men decided to re-define the words. What are we supposed to use in place of these words? Reclaim English. Reclaim definitions.

On CBS This Morning Gale King is interviewing a young girl named Stephanie, who was said to have also surived the staged Parkland school shooting, what are the odds? and of course she is wearing a Jewish chai necklace and both Gale and the girl are suited up in Jewish Royal Purple, those that can’t see through this are willfully asleep. According to the system of Gematria the Hebrew letters of Chai add up to 18, and that can be broken down to 666.

I totally agree, it appears like yours could be a logical conclusion if all the facts bear that conclusion, but as with any search for truth, if more compelling evidence is found which points in a different direction, personal preference and confirmation bias must be put aside in preference for truth. When evidence shows that re-bar was used in the original 1910 construction of the El Gigante statue, then twice pointing to exposed re-bar and explaining it away by saying the re-bar was put there post construction as a subsequent damage repair, is a ridiculous example of confirmation bias.

Thank you for still noticing, knowing, and commenting

Sorry, thought I had done that. First post.

The fake shooting at MSU happened on February 13 th 2023, it was referred to as a Valentine’s Day shooting which was preceded by a Swatting event a week prior at Okemos Highschool on February 7th, that event was the rehearsal for the fake shooting at MSU, they always praise themselves for their arrival times, in this case it was their MASSIVE PRESENCE by multiple agencies.

Get the ropes fellas...

Three points form a triangle, which is another way to represent compasses. And triangular sides of a pyramid. Three plus one makes four points, which represent a square. The base of a pyramid. Compasses and square,and voila ... masons at work, we get all the masonic logos out in the open that are combination of a circle drawn by compasses and a square. Where ever there is a combination of three with an addition of one, there are masons behind. Or a triangle and a square. Or a circle and a square and many other combinations. Or three prime colors with addition of fourth color. Or, for that matter, N and S. The letter N is made out of three lines - two of them run in parallel, representing the two pillars symbolizing Boaz and Jachin - and the letter S is made out in one serpent-like move. NS-31is the same signalling, doubled. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVG1Rhl47ko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PZ68xlkqM0&pp=0gcJCX4JAYcqIYzv

A very good point CJ, it’s not about death and violence, it’s about grabbing the guns. This is reminiscent of the alleged MSU shooting, where the press and Sandy Hook Promise glorified the thought that one person could be a twice baked victim of one of these phony contrivances. https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=YAHYUG5HMDAA rnFred Guttenberg is an American activist against GUNS, rn(He’s not against wrongful death by guns)

I quit taking pictures and videos of this garbage which I started doing in December of 2017, people that were born some 20 years ago look up and think it’s all normal because it’s all they can remember, that’s how brainwashing works, there are only a few people that notice and care. Thanks for the video.

Fake shooting fake interview.

Another shooting (FAKE) at an American school what else is there to say, these unreal shootings will continue it all part of the 2030 New World Order agenda. Screw the Jew. Palestinians really get shot with the AR (ArmaLite) black rifles everyday in Gaza by your fellow Jews, do something about that

Their story starts with 4 victims hospitalized, then changes to 4 hospitalized + 1 dead, to 4 hospitalized to 2 dead to 5 injured + 2 dead to 7 injured + 2 dead .....so what are the odds this scumbags daughter just happened to know all these students at this University ...correct me if I,m wrong but didn’t they orginally say the gun was owned by a cop? Then they they changed it to a woman ?.....remember folks this is also the anniversary of the Boston marathon bombing hoax ...where they proudly displayed the dad of Martin Richard( just now on fake news media)...who looks exactly like The infamous Robbi Parker...keeping the hoaxes alive...now if can excuse me folks, I have to go barf ..

Hi Jaime, will you please put a title and at least a basic description in this. At the top right hand corner next to your profile is manage account and you can click on edit and add the title. Thanks!

The ripples or waves in all different directions all over the sky was what struck me as unusual. That and at one point the cloud-like material caused a white out on my camera, but nothing else. It was weird, the sky looked just like the rest of the pictures but was unable to capture anything.

This was the afternoon/evening of April 10th in Bethel Island, CA.

Another dead giveaway, they mentioned the windows on the capsule had to be 1/3 the surface area of the capsule...watch the live interview again....its in our face...sick fucks!

That one is a little odd! They usually spray above the cloud cover... unless maybe they have certain height requirement for effectiveness! Another weird thing I notice is very distinct strait vertical sharp edges on fast moving storms that I don’t ever remember seeing in my younger days back in the 60s 70s or even the 80s for that matter!. Also in my area here in the North East seems to be a significant starting point for spraying....the aircraft (2 side by side today) always take unusually sharp turns (especially sharp for such large aircraft) at the beginning of their spraying cycle.