Comments

So, where does the ‘I’ in AI come from? Does intelligence emerge from neural or simulated neural activity, or is it the refinement of processing of signals that already exist?

You are correct. one of the few things AI cannot yet do in information space is design complex systems that meet the goals that you or a team have in mind but are not yet able to define adequately to turn the AI loose on them. AI cannot yet define and evaluate the most desired scoring criteria to determine if it’s “doing a good job”, kind of like a hyper-acute autistic kid on mental steroids, but without crystal-clear direction. Possibly because we mere humans are not capable of phrasing the complex problems or questions clearly enough. No doubt that ChatGPT can now give me a method faster than I can write it myself for a particular purpose, but it can’t yet decide what functions I should have in a multi-project solution for a given application. I suppose that could be coming though.

Good question. Why does it feel like all of RFK Jr.’s rhetoric is going to deceptively lead to more deregulation and simply the inability to even find out what toxins are being added to food, rather than reducing those toxins?

https://www.rfpmm.org/pdf/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people.pdf. When trying to influence someone … Neill … make sure to awkwardly use their name a creepily unnatural number of times.

Whether it is irrefutable evidence or not depends on whether or not there is verifiable information beyond emotional testimonies. There appear to be enough testimonies and evidence at this point to conclude that these things are happening, but any given case relies on evidence, and an emotional video is not evidence any more than a Sandy Hook parent claiming that their child was killed constitutes evidence. And nothing moves forward without hard evidence. Appeals to emotion are not evidence. That is simply confirmation bias. Add to that the fact that CHD was an RFK Jr.-linked thing and we all know how credible he is. I am not saying that these people are not telling the truth. I tend to believe them, but that is not “evidence” in the legal sense.

This is all one needs to do to harness the power of AI so that even if the internet dies, you will never lose the worlds knowledge. https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence/how-implement-deepseek-locallyrnrnI have built deepseek models along with a ton of other ones that I try as they come out. The video creation models are getting intense and inside a year you will be able to make a full on movie that is hollywood grade in your house. No actors or actresses ever needed. AI never sleeps.

As I mentioned before, people need to adapt or they will die. Especially in the work force. There are some jobs that can’t be touched but for the most part, robotics with large language models have already taken over everything. It won’t be more than a year before you will have all of these robots in your house. For those keeping up with the robotics and AI, which not only am I doing but loving every last second of it, there are already robots that can put dishes into a dishwasher, put your groceries away, do your laundry, rake leaves into a bag, mow your yard, ect. The only people that will have job security right out of the gate are those that know how to repair PC’s and adapt to the robots. Like everything else, they will break down, have issues, and need repair centers. But eventually there will be robots to fix the other robots. We are now in a world where humans have far to many flaws when compared to the abilities of AI and robotics. As far as this particular video is concerned, its actually old school AI. And when I say old school, you could do these short little clips like this 6 months ago. Where AI is today is you can do much longer clips with people break dancing and dancing extremely fast. From the early AI models that couldn’t get hands and text right, the new AI has all of this fixed. Elevenlabs has been able to clone a voice with only a few seconds of actual voice and you would have no idea it wasn’t the person you are talking to. Scams and grifts are totally off the chains now as well. You can simply call someones house and get them to talk for only a few seconds, feed that into AI and you can call their bank and voice identify them. If you know their pins and codes and birth dates and the basics, you can get new credit cards issued to new addresses and pull out loans on their houses as well. The entire Israel Hamas attacks were more than likely full on AI and that tricked the entire world. I mentioned in another post that I have a dedicated linux box at my house running a HUGE dataset that doesn’t need the Internet at all. I have the entire worlds info sitting on my SSD drives and I can figure anything out even when the Internet goes down. Every single 24 hour span brings out 25 new tools and companies doing remarkable things. AI never sleeps and all the new AI models are actually training themselves using AI models and not using people at all. The early days of AI had humans testing all the results but now that is all in the past. The very best thing people can do at the present, if your in the US is lock everyone one of the credit agencies credit checks so nobody can pull credit, make sure you have way more than simple voice authentication on your banks, and be aware that simply answering the phone and saying a few words to those who have already stolen your data in some data leak can get you fully hacked. The new world isnt the same as the old world. The rules are fully different and the need for humans is pretty much over. No reason to have slow employees that answer the phone when you can have a full on AI agent answer your phone, deal with what issues the caller is needing, book a meeting, research something, schedule your calendar, lookup flight times and get the best prices on the flight, schedule that flight, book your taxi, and then send you a 1 page itinerary. What I described already exists in many many platforms. I have been playing with AI agents now for a long time. This even eliminates researchers as you can have an agent run through 300 medical papers and pull out whatever info you want, unbiased, and give you a quick report. When its on, its on and its definitely on.

BTW, I think in that excellent talk, Bill Cooper also does a decent job explaining the “ozone” scam.

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=HO7MOM4U7K6B. Unqualified declarations about things where scale is the most important variable. Too much sun exposure is bad, but no sun exposure is also bad. Not enough vitamin A can hurt your vision, but too much is toxic. WiFi works in microwave ranges, but microwaves can be used as weapons, just like too much sound can literally cause you to explode at high enough power inputs. The misuse oof scales is a key aspect of disinformation.

There’s also the question about gamma-irradiation of hermetically-sealed food to preserve it. That will kill any living microbes in the sealed food, but I don’t know how thorough any studies have been to evaluate how the nutrients in the irradiated food are affected. Of course, conventional mainstream will declare it’s safe with no need to present evidence, and some people will declare it’s pure poison, with no need to present any evidence. Something kills the microbes, and that is done by disrupting their molecule structures. The same molecules people then consume as food. Some careful studies would be warranted, if the notion was not dismissed as “conspiracy theory”.

Microwaves could indeed potentially destroy key nutrients faster than conventional cooking, depending on the energy level used and the time used, despite what I stated in my previous comments, however. That is similar to conventional cooking to the point of burning and charring. Except with microwaves you can destroy those molecular bonds before the dehydration that typically accompanies conventional burning of food. But a microwave can be used without overdoing it too.

How does an egg go from liquid to solid when cooked? The vibrational energy in the albumin (protein) of the egg white, and various proteins in the yoke, becomes so great that they “denature” and lose their shape, allowing the internal parts of the proteins that are more like grease or oil than water to clump together like oil or grease in water. When the clump up or “aggregate”, the material in the egg that was soluble in water forms big water-excluding solid matter. This happens whether in a frying pan or a microwave oven.

Yeah, no. I’ve seen posts from social media by these two supposed victims. I highly doubt that they’re Christians, or that they actually died.

This could use some corroboration. Microwaves are generally considered to be frequencies between a little under 2 GHz to ~300 GHz, depending on who decides they get to define them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave. https://www.everythingrf.com/tech-resources/frequency-bands. Microwaves heat by directly interacting with molecular bonds, causing them to vibrate when certain EMF ranges are absorbed by those bonds, which is literally the definition of “temperature” (the vibrational energy of molecular matter). This cooks things by exceeding activation energies for various molecular rearrangements, which does indeed change the chemistry of what is being cooked. Adding heat by “conventional” means does exactly the same thing. The “temperature” of a frying pan is the rate of kinetic vibration of its molecules, which is transferred to the food like trillions of linebackers crashing into an offensive line. Same result, slightly different process. Cooking food on a grill creates the same potential products that cooking food with microwaves does. Well, maybe not 100% the same, but there are a lot of overlaps. The differences only lie in which molecular bonds are most targeted. If you use WiFi, the information being transmitted is being passed along microwave carrier signals, currently most commonly 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. Just lower energy levels. But microwaves do not carry “toxins”. Granted, toxic byproducts can result, but that’s also true of conventional cooking. It boils down (pun unintended) to a trade-off between taste, risk of food poisoning and risk of byproducts of cooking food. If course cooking disrupts food. That’s the whole point. To kill germs and parasites while leaving some level of nutritional value. Animals other than humans obviously do not cook their food. Trying to determine exactly what toxic byproducts are produced by microwaving and corroborating that with actual evidence would be more helpful than simply stating that microwaves are magically poisonous.

Another obvious smoking gun and yet somewhere out there right now some pregnant woman is being coerced. I have two advanced science degrees and backed away from a Doctorate program offer. How many people have to get sick and/or die before people wake up? Has the world gone mad or is everyone so dumbed down they just do as they are told without question? How many people actually get it?

That ’person’ on the left almost retorted that ’the poor do not have to pay for health services for diabetes, etc...’ !! in reaction to the ’cost to your health’. They don’t care if we get sick and/or die. She obviously believes that identifying foods that are dangerous to your health is a bad thing. How can anyone take a contrary position on this subject without being a total shill? Yes Shill Person, let’s take the warnings off of rat poison too.

ONE THING IS THAT THEY HAVE BEEN USED TO DIVIDE AND CREATE RACIAL TENSION AND ANOTHER TOTALLY DIFFERENT IS STATING THE FACT THAT THE SUBSAHARIAN RACES GENERALLY SPEAKING HAVE NOT CONTRIBUTED DIRECTLY MUCH TO MODERN CIVILISATION OR THE ANCIENT FOR THAT MATTER < FACTS HAVE NOT PREJUDICES < THEY JUST SHOWN EMPIRICAL TRUTHS

I think that fella is what one would call milk chocolate. For those racist people that hate those who intermarry, he may wanna look in that tree a bit closer. It doesn’t matter if you are white, black, brown, or purple. We all bleed red. Focus on the controllers and those trying to kill off all the human race.

How is this not irrefutable evidence? When is this madness going to stop?

WILLIAM KUNSTLER ( JEW) CHICAGO 7 PSYOP IS THERE TOO , HIS JEWISH WIFE Marg(aret Ratner Kunstler is a civil rights attorney who has worked with WikiLeaks, Julian Assange ( ANOTHER PSYOP AGENT), and Sarah Harrison. She has also worked with Anonymous and was the attorney for Jeremy Hammond MORE PSYOPS AGENTS !! ARE YOU GETTING THE PICTURE?