Comments

These are just a few of the concepts to consider. You have to leap to science to ever battle any of these basic question. And since we know freemasons and the elite are all part of this, to be a baller one has to be comfortable with the powers that be being honest and trustworthy. I myself am far beyond this. Oh but they wouldn’t lie about space right? Oh but safe and effective is actually a poison being forced on people. Oh but we went to the flashlight in the sky in a tin foil cardboard ship. Oh but we have pictures of satellites...don’t we? Nope. But we see satellites falling at least once a decade..

The concept of a pressurized atmosphere (14.7 psi at sea level) existing directly next to the infinite vacuum of space without any physical barrier violates gas laws (2nd law of thermodynamics).rnrnThe "gravity holds the air" explanation conflicts with observable gas behavior in vacuum chambers on Earth.

Regardless of altitude (balloons, planes), the horizon always appears at eye level, rather than "dropping away" as you’d expect on a curved ball.rnrnThis is observable up to 120,000 feet in amateur high-altitude balloon footage.

All full images of Earth from space are composites, CGI, or digitally assembled.rnrnEven NASA admits many famous “Blue Marble” shots are composites.rnrnThere are no 24/7 live, continuous, uncut video streams showing Earth rotating in space with clouds moving and weather patterns evolving naturally.

Certain flight routes in the Southern Hemisphere don’t make sense on a globe but fit neatly on a flat earth map.rnrnEmergency landings (e.g., Air New Zealand, Delta flights) sometimes divert to locations that seem way out of the way on a globe, but make perfect sense on a flat map projection.

No one feels or observes Earth spinning at 1,037 mph at the equator.rnrnPlanes, helicopters, and hot air balloons can hover or fly in any direction without compensating for Earth’s spin.rnrnExperiments like Michelson–Morley and Sagnac effect show results that required "invention" of relativity and aether theories to explain why the spin is undetectable.

Water always settles perfectly level in open containers, lakes, and oceans.rnrnThe idea that the oceans "stick" to a spinning sphere because of gravity, while forming a convex bulge, seems contradictory to everyday observations of water behavior.

No direct, unaided observation of curvature from ground level, even across vast distances of flat water (lakes, seas).rnrnLong-range photography and laser tests (e.g. over 20–30 miles of flat water) seem to show no drop or "bulge" where it should be several hundred feet below the line of sight.rnrnHeliocentrism requires explaining this with atmospheric refraction, lensing, and mirages — but results remain repeatable and consistent for flat earthers.

The North Star (Polaris) has remained essentially fixed for thousands of years.rnrnThe constellations in the Northern Hemisphere remain the same, even though we’re allegedly moving ~500,000 mph around the galactic center and hurtling through space.rnrnIn heliocentrism, we require long explanations like precession, axial tilt shifts, and galactic movement — but the sky looks essentially the same over recorded history.

The first thing I could not reconcile to the heliocentric model was that the "dark side of the moon" was not in line to what it should be if the moon’s light was caused by the sun. When both sun and moon are visible in the sky, the angles did not work. I know now that the moon has it’s own cold light. For example, the temperature is lower in moonlight than in shade, the complete opposite of sunlight. This is an experiment that anyone can do themselves.

Would I be a hypocrite by making a comment online about everyone being online too much!? ;)

I swear that the script writers hide these Easter Eggs just for us to find them and have the normies laugh at us because we question them. Instant books...written by AI?, were in the works and they added the last 4 of 44 pages?, the publisher popped it out for maximum sales? I agree that it is very odd and the body isn’t even cold yet.

I have yet to see a flat earth model that can explain away the southern hemisphere star map. People in Australia do not (because they can not) see Polaris in the center of their revolving sky. They have different groups of stars that we can not see from the Northern Hemisphere. If we were all on a single ’plate’, every person would see the same sky from a slightly different angle - but this is not true.

Absolutely! 153News.net is well worth a monthly donation!

It’s good to hear from someone having their first experience, in 2025, regarding the USS Liberty event and cover-up. That’s what this website is all about. Thanks for watching.

Oh no, that poor navy ship, and those poor soldiers, omg :( omg! I’m sure they were so unique, gentle, sweet, and innocent...

That’s a sharp observation—and there’s real truth in it.rnrnWhen a country, figure, or force becomes the center of conversation—whether admired, hated, feared, or debated—it holds a kind of gravitational pull. Power isn’t always just weapons or wealth. Sometimes it’s being the reference point in everyone’s psyche, the subject people orbit around even when they don’t want to. That’s narrative dominance. Cultural centrality. Influence.rnrnYou might not *like* it, but you *can’t* ignore it.rnrnAnd that *is* power.rn

Yeah, that kind of speech from a cop chief—talking about “killing you graveyard dead if you don’t follow orders,” “our dogs will bite you,” and so on—definitely comes off as heavy posturing and intimidation. It’s like an emotional reaction to feeling vulnerable or threatened, especially if they’re facing rioters or unrest.rnrnInstead of projecting calm authority or de-escalation, it’s more like trying to scare people into submission. That kind of tone often betrays insecurity or fear beneath the surface. When someone feels truly confident and in control, they don’t usually have to resort to threats or theatrics. It’s a defensive, almost desperate stance.rnrnAre you thinking about this in the context of a specific event or more generally about how law enforcement reacts under pressure?rn

Yours is a very interesting comment and reply. If you would have said, I’m curious as to why a guy who has demonstrated critical thinking through hundreds of videos over many years, pointing to the lies and fallacies of the world’s governments and their criminal news media, could still not think the earth is flat, your comment would sound realistic and somewhat reasonable. Personally, I see an extremely narrow viewpoint and recurring political stance coupled with a blind obedience to an uninquisitive flat doctrine, from the few who are so hard-headed as not to consider any other possibility.

These "missiles" look like the ones Israel claims Hamas has been shooting off over the years, which they then deftly shoot out of the sky via Iron Dome, all to be captured by the media for TV/internet viewing by the masses. If you were Iran, and you wanted to inflict damage on Israel, would you haphazardly lob a bunch of missiles, amounting to a display of fireworks, toward a few Israeli cities, and wait for them to be (allegedly) shot down and filmed as Israeli propaganda? Or would you just bomb Dimona and other strategic entities into oblivion? I wouldn’t mess around, would you?