Comments

Hurricane Katrina

I’m sure they did not take the lethal injection, they need them to spread the propaganda.

Saw segment’s of this as far as 11years back, but thanks for refreshing us.1st it’s your guns, then your food and gas and everything else you have for sustenance and worked for, and it’s written into unconstitutional law. Many of those whose guns were confiscated never got them back as they were told by these order follower’s that they were dumped in a lake and didn’t tell them which one, RIGHT. I followed Colion Noir for awhile and he has some valid arguments, but he follows the same mainstream narrative when it comes mass casualty shootings, that all of them are real and if you think differently you are a conspiracy theorist. Yes what happened after Katrina will happen again and they are waiting to pull off the next false flag to make sure it will happen.

When did this happen?

The clock is a ticking on these useful idiots.

Gimme gimme gimme !!!

Right on , just more demon lies .

The censorship is astounding. Kind of an odd video but documenting the physical destruction before it all gets bulldozed is probably a good idea. The news media in their lovefest for Israel shows the evacuation of the people south as Israel’s great humanitarian benevolence, but they fail to examine the logistics. The people have nowhere to return. When BIBI D’ Yahoo returned from his exile, meaner and more arrogant than ever, I knew it wasn’t going to be good.

She didn’t get enough money already to keep quiet about the hoax and her mother.

Stephen Quayle has some interesting information on giants ,but I’m not sure he is a believer in the Biblical sense, and because he is always on INFOWARS, he may be controlled opposition as well.

I always thought they just printed up the money to pay for these hoaxes and donations were just a way to explain were all the money paid to "victims" came from. If all that money came from real donations there has to be quite a few stupid sheeple suckers among us.

The true Holocaust taking place before the world’s blinded eyes as evidence by these pictures, many of which will never be seen to demonstrate this inhuman atrocity.

I hope all the 153 guys get to go to the same FEMA camp so we can hang out together.

Seems like some of this is legit, but gemstone guardian pocket angels?

MAD THAT MATE, IT WORKS, duno then.

You can cure cancer for free. Study on Amandha Dawn Vollmer ADV yumnaturals

What’s extra sad is that a homeless orphan could be better off going to the camps

I’ve thought they just had individual hoax funds that paid the actors, but they’ve actually created a whole centralized shooting hoax industry. But it makes perfect sense. Of course they would centralize the operations, also making it easier for the Pentagon to monitor and govern the collective events more effectively.

The entire fight against Amalek is ridiculous. The modern state of Israel has poached the term Gods people. They are not Gods people. Gods people wouldn’t have abortion clinics all over their country. https://www.google.com/search?q=abortion+clinics+israel&oq=abortion+clinics+israel&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDQyNThqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#trex=m_dg:1,m_r:1,m_t:gwp,rc_q:abortion%2520clinics%2520israel,rc_ui:2,ru_gwp:0%252C6,ru_q:abortion%2520clinics%2520israel,trex_id:GBTIBfrnrnIf the so called Jews were Gods people they would have a satanic Talmud or use the Zohar or Kabalah. It’s all demonology but yet they have tricked the whole world, yet again.

The name Abimelech means "my father is king" a name borne by five Old Testament persons.rnThe name of two kings of Philistia; the first was a contemporary of Abraham, the second, probably son of the former, was king in the days of Isaac. It is quite possible that Abimelech was the royal title rather than the personal name, since in the title of Psalms 34 we find it applied to the king of Gath, elsewhere known by his personal name, Achish (1 Samuel 27:2,3). Shortly after the destruction of Sodom Abraham journeyed with his herds and flocks into the extreme Southeast country of Palestine (Genesis 20). While sojourning at Gerar, the city of Abimelech, king of the Philistine country, he made believe that Sarah was his sister (Genesis 20:2), and Abimelech took her, intending to make her one of his wives. But God rebuked him in a dream, besides sending barrenness on the women of his household (Genesis 20:3,17). After Abimelech had reproved Abraham most justly for the deception, he dealt generously with him, loading him with presents and granting him the liberty of the land (Genesis 20:14,15). When contention had arisen between the servants of the two men over the wells of water the two men made a covenant at a well, which took its name, Beersheba, from this fact of covenant-making (Genesis 21:31,32).rnrnNearly a century later than the events connected with the first Abimelech a second Abimelech, king of the Philistines, is mentioned in relations with Isaac (Genesis 26), who in time of grievous famine went down from his home, probably at Hebron, to Gerar. Fearing for his life because of his beautiful wife, Rebekah, he called her his sister, just as Abraham had done with reference to Sarah. Neither Abimelech nor any of his people took Rebekah to wife--quite a variation from the Abrahamic incident; but when the falsehood was detected, he upbraided Isaac for what might have happened, continuing nevertheless to treat him most graciously. Isaac continued to dwell in the vicinity of Gerar, until contention between his herdsmen and those of Abimelech became too violent; then he moved away by stages, reopening the wells dug by his father (Genesis 26:18-22). Finally, a covenant was made between Abimelech and Isaac at Beersheba, just as had been made between Abraham and the first Abimelech (Genesis 26:26-33). The two kings of Philistia were probably father and son.rnrnThe title of Psalms 34 mentions another Abimelech, who in all probability is the same as Achish king of Gath (1 Samuel 21:10-22:1); with whom David sought refuge when fleeing from Saul, and with whom he was dwelling at the time of the Philistine invasion of Israel, which cost Saul his kingdom and his life (1 Samuel 27). It appears from this that Abimelech was the royal title, and not the personal name of the Philistine kings. A son of Gideon (Judges 9) who aspired to be king after the death of his father, and did rule three years (Judges 9:22). He first won the support of the members of his mother’s family and their recommendation of himself to all Israel (Judges 9:3, 4). He then murdered all the sons of his father, seventy in number, at Ophrah, the family home in the tribe of Manasseh, Jotham the youngest son alone escaping (Judges 9:5). After this, Abimelech was made ruler by an assembly of the people at Shechem. An insurrection led by Gaal the son of Ebed having broken out in Shechem, Abimelech, although he succeeded in capturing that city, was wounded to death by a mill-stone, which a woman dropped from the wall upon his head, while he was storming the citadel of Thebez, into which the defeated rebels had retreated, after that city also had been taken (Judges 9:50-53). Finding that he was mortally wounded and in order to avoid the shame of death at a woman’s hand, he required his armor-bearer to kill him with his sword (Judges 9:54). His cruel treatment of the Shechemites (Judges 9:46-49), when they took refuge from him in their strong tower, was a just judgment for their acquiescence in his crimes (Judges 9:20, 57); while his own miserable death was retribution for his bloody deeds (Judges 9:56).rnrnA fifth person by the name of Abimelech was a priest in the days of David; a descendant of Ithamar and Eli, and son of Abiathar (1 Chronicles 18:16). In the Septuagint and in 1 Chronicles 24 he is called Ahimelech; but is not to be confused with Ahimelech, the father of Abiathar, and therefore his grandfather. He shared with Zadok, of the line of Ithamar, the priestly office in the reign of David (1 Chronicles 24:31).rn