Comments

Yeah, I’ve spent hundreds of hours and years behind telescopes and taking pictures. Nebulae and planets. Planets most definitely look like planets through a telescope. I have the “not cheap” variety. Astrophysics 130mm refractor, Celestron 11” SCT, William Optics 80mm, Astrophysics Mach1 EQ mount, SBIG CCD with two TECs and self-guiding filter wheel with Astrodon color and narrow-band filters in Ha, SII and OIII, 3nm bandpass. ZWO 1600 CMOS with TEC, auto-focusers, remote control. When you open a camera shutter and know how to align the telescope mount and track with the Earth’s rotation, you can take 30+ minute exposures with no blurring. Try opening a camera shutter with a telephoto lens for even 30 seconds on a stationary tripod and watch the stars blur an streak from the motion.

No, there are no other planets. Have you actually looked at one for yourself. Your planets look much different when you actually try to figure out things for yourself instead of just thinking some photo of something has to be true. Pretty different view one takes after getting even a cheap telescope or camera or even get a nice one doesn’t matter. But what you see and what they tell you you see are quite different. And no it doesn’t leave a lot of holes. There are numerous credible videos and documentation explaining each one. The ffact that think there are holes just shows you haven’t actually looked. And no people don’t know what is past the wall. Kinda hard to know that when no one can actually go there to see. But there are numerous accounts you can find which makes some ccases which are quite compelling. But hey i actually like to find my information and continue to expand it and don’t watch 5 minutes of shit and then expect people to answer questions for me. Guess I just am old fashioned and not one for letting people tell me how or what to think and rather go into material for myself and come out with my own conclusions. But hey man you do your thing. Best of luck on your journey

No. You clearly just buy into anything you hear without looking into them. Flat earth was known by every civilization from the past. The Cia as much as they like to think they can be everywhere. Did not exists then to run a psyop. They did however realize that fe was becoming more and more widespread and did their damage control of it. So they co-opted the movement with a bunch of retard shills who give you some of the facts about fe truth while then poisoning the well with ridiculous "facts" that are just nonsense which in turn makes people discard fe without ever really looking into it. And throwing out shit like it was a Cia pysop into the internets and watching the sheepies eat it up and come around saying it on comments without knowing anything about anything. Never actually doing their homework. Let’s face it anyone who spends even a couple days looking at legit fe stuff and using their head and conducting observations themselves understands. But Thanks for your super well thought out opinion buddy.. Your are just the kinda prey they rely on. As much as I would love to think you would see this as a wake up call of not falling for stupid shit, sadly it won’t even register and will keep up the same ol same ol endlessly being hoodwinked.

CGI is very recent. How did people see the same sky we do now before computers existed? I remember looking up at the night sky as a child 40+ years ago. No CGI. I’ve taken hundreds of pictures through telescopes. No CGI. There is something “out there” that corresponds quite accurately to what other people report seeing “out there”, and it definitely moves at a rate of one “cycle” every 24 hours with additional, and very predictable, cyclic changes over the course of 365 days. These things fit a model of the Earth being a sphere and orbiting the sun very accurately, even if it is not true. But something has to account for the accuracy, because it works precisely year after year. Of course, Ptolemy’s epicycle model worked with the sun orbiting the Earth too. It was just very complicated, and all of the epicycle fudge factors could be thrown out with the heliocentric model. A flat model leaves a lot of holes, like why does everything move predictably and cyclicly in a way that works perfectly in a heliocentric model? And what is after the big wall? And why does everything else naturally want to form a sphere or sphere-like 3D shape? (Other planets, water droplets, oil droplets, most organisms’ eggs, cells, etc).

They are all controlled by evil in the Great Lakes State !

Yes it was and on purpose I suspect !

FE doesn’t have a model, but almost those phenomenons can be explained, if the sun and moon are circling the earth, specially if you consider the sun as something, that travels between tropic along the year, moving not only daily in a east/west motion, but also north south and south north in half year cycles. Heliocentric model, for example can’t explain selenium eclipses, a pressurized environment next to an endless vacuum, neither how constellations are perfectly aligned with thousands of years ago positions, like egiptian pyramids testify.

No, they saw it coming and started a controlled narrative. That’s why the majority of the FE "big channels" are shills.

It would be interesting to know if the low level teleprompter reader actually knows anything, or if, more likely, like the rest of us, just suspects something is up and that is what slipped out.

hehehehehe

You are Io’s gadfly.

That is not a statement of guarantee that I am right. Of course I believe that I am, but I do not discount alternative explanations out of hand (I might based upon what I consider evidence though).

And one last thing: I do not believe the world is flat. I have spent far too much time over too many years taking multi-hour, and multi-night, pictures with telescopes and watching the apparent motions of everything in the sky. They all fit a model that I believe to make sense. Also, the conundrum of satellite dish alignment is easily explained by geosynchronous orbiting satellites, which are openly accessible and trackable in publicly-available databases. But my belief in the geometry of the Earth and solar system is secondary to my desire for a future for our children, and I will take sincere and honest people with trivial beliefs that differ from my own over lying genocidal psychopaths any day, so thank you for your dedication to what you believe to be true.

SeeWhatIMean ) yeah its absolute insanity how I accidently rocked and overhauled a huge part of the beast systems ability to repair itself automatically. My little cowboy project ended up being teams and teams of people now perfecting as close to AI physical repairs as there has ever been. I guess some dude named his kid Ronin based on that little project. If I had never existed at google they would have 5 million machines and 1 million of them broken. So great job jboss...way to make evil healthier. Even to that point I believed in their motto of dont be evil. The only good news is that I may be a bit overqualified as your 153news IT guy. When we get ddosed, we dos em back, as the bastards try to crack us daily, we defend, and when the powers that be steal our box we scramble. Its one IT dude, incredible content creators, and angel donators vs the powers that be’s dudes. We are a gnat on the backs of giants.

Freudian slip

That’s what I thought. Maybe more of a Goldsteinian slip than a Freudian one.

Heck, just like you coded control systems for Google, I have worked in the past directly with the guy in charge of pushing vaccine schedules for Operation Warp Speed. Crazy world.

And I agree that agents are probably ubiquitous. And not everybody is on one “side” or another.

SeeWhatIMean ) thanks for the explanation. cheers

Bossman: I did not mean to say the fibers are nothing. But I will say the fibers do not appear to be alive. They (at least what I have seen) appear to be carbon nanofibers that are experimental in ionically-charged filter masks. I would not claim they are healthy or harmless to breathe, because I don’t really know. Asbestos was once thought to be harmless.