Comments

Regardless, thanks for that vid...great stuff. I’ll be posting it on jamesfetzer.org.

thanks

Russ....sixteen hundred. 1600.

THANK YOU ANDREAS

Due diligence. What is your due diligence? 5G is merely 5th generation. You guys get hoaxed so easily. Please provide your weapons grid RF analysis.

good to hear from you again in your video, thanks Diana.

looks like the google chrome icon behind his head

they will not escape

God bless

Rise up!!!

these dirty evil bastards russ, if i had one wish before i die? i want to see all of these satanic people that have played a part in this? get the rope, keep safe brother and god bless

downloaded for the 5g info. there were a couple pieces of history included that i hadn’t know about yet.

good message in general with this vid, i think. the 5g is definitely a weapons grid, and anyone that hasn’t done the due diligence to come to an informed conclusion on that, that’s on you. this event stinks of lying accounts to me, especially the cop tv-show where he keeps saying ’a security guard got a prick in his neck’ as the cops behind are holding back laughter. the perverse joke is obvious. as with all things jesuit, there’s ’learning against learning’ involved here. we’ve just got to pick through the pile and find the buried pearls. pretty much life right there..

Don’t know about the ByteDance but anything being promoted / pushed by the mainstream media sooner or later shows its ugly face and TikTok is promoted by the ms media. Never used TikTok shit so far but I guess it’s only used as an app, that is not over the browser. Anything which can only be used as an app , is bullshit.

"Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." (1 Thessalonians 5:21)

The British and Foreign Bible Society published a Greek Testament, and the alternative rendering for Matthew 28:19 was phrased “en to onomati mou” (“in my name”). Eusebius was cited as the authority.rnrnThe earliest versions of Matthew do not contain the verse at all. And not due to omission, but due to removal.rnrn“It is doubted whether the explicit injunction of Matt. 28:19 can be accepted as uttered by Jesus. ...But the Trinitarian formula in the mouth of Jesus is certainly unexpected" (A Dictionary of Christ and the Gospels, J. Hastings, 1906, page 170).rnrn"Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." (1 Thessalonians 5:21)rnrnMatthew 28:19 "... has been disputed on textual grounds, but in the opinion of many scholars the words may still be regarded as part of the true text of Matthew. There is, however, grave doubt whether thy may be the ipsissima verba of Jesus. The evidence of Acts 2:38; 10:48 (cf. 8:16; 19:5), supported by Gal. 3:27; Rom 6:3, suggest that baptism in early Christianity was administered, not in the threefold name, but "in the name of Jesus Christ" or "in the name of the Lord Jesus." This is difficult to reconcile with the specific instructions of the verse at the end of Matthew" (The Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible, 1962, page 351).rnrnCritical scholarship, on the whole, rejects the traditional attribution of the tripartite baptismal formula to Jesus and regards it as of later origin. Undoubtedly then the baptismal formula originally consisted of one part and it gradually developed into its tripartite form (The Philosophy of the Church Fathers, Vol. 1, Harry Austryn Wolfson, 1964, pg 143).rnrnG.R. Beasley-Murray in his book, "Baptism in the New Testament" and a believer of the trinity doctrine, gives us some new insight on how the original text of Matthew 28:19 was structured:rnrn"A whole group of exegetes and critics have recognized that the opening declaration of Matt. 28:18 demands a Christological statement to follow it: "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Me" leads us to expect as a consequence, "Go and make disciples unto Me among all the nations, baptising them in My name, teaching them to observe all things I commanded you." In fact, the first and third clauses have that significance: it looks as though the second clause has been modified from a Christological to a Trinitarian formula in the interests of the liturgical tradition" (G.R. Beasley-Murray, Baptism in the New Testament, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1962, pg. 83).rnrnIn the ante-nicaean writings of so called Church Father and Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea we have this version:rn,,πορενθέντες μαθητύσατε πάντα τά έθνη έν τώ όνόματί μον, διδάsκοντες αύτούς τηρεϊν πάντα όςα ένετειλάμην ύμϊν.”rnrn" ... in My name ..."rnrnThis is what the text originally saidrnrnAll power is given unto me...go therefore...make disciples in my name, teaching them...whatsoever I have commanded ...I am with you... (Matthew 28:18-20)rnrn"It is clear, therefore, that of the MSS which Eusebius inherited from his predecessor, Pamphilus, at Caesarea in Palestine, some at least preserved the original reading, in which there was no mention either of Baptism or of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. It had been conjectured by Dr. Davidson, Dr. Martineau, by the present Dean of Westminister, and by Prof. Harnack (to mention but a few names out of many), that here the received text, could not contain the very words of Jesus? This long before any one except Dr. Burgon, who kept the discovery to himself, had noticed the Eusebian form of the reading." "It is satisfactory to notice that Dr. Eberhard Nestle, in his new edition of the New Testament in Latin and Greek, furnishes the Eusebian reading in his critical apparatus, and that Dr. Sanday seems to lean to its acceptance" (History of New Testament Criticism, Conybeare, 1910, pages, 98-102, 111-112).rnrnhttp://www.israelofgod.org/Constantine.htm

XXXV. THE NAME by which the Deity wills to be known is neither God nor Lord, but YAHWEH or YAH, commonly pronounced Jehovah and Jah, -- "Extol him that rideth upon the heavens by His name Yah" (Psa. 68:4). He was not known to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob by this name; they knew him by the name, AIL SHADDAI -- the strength of the powerful ones. The memorial He ordained as the basis of His name is Ehyeh asher Ehyer. I WILL BE who I WILL BE; not as in the English version, "I am that I am;" I who speak to thee, Moses, WILL BE manifested in the seed or nature of Abraham. When the Eternal Creator should be thus manifested, the flesh-manifestation would be the Christ, Messiah, or YAHWEH-NAME. This name was incipiently manifested four years before the Vulgar Era, and was called by divine command, by the Hebrew name YASHUA, he who shall be, the Saviour, rendered into Greek Yai-sous, or Jesus. This incipient manifestation of Elohim, was "perfected" on the third day after crucifixion, and taken up again into glory forty days after being "made perfect." The proximate manifestation of the YAHWEH-NAME is the development, during the times of the Gentiles, of "a people for the name" by the "obedience of faith," and the perfecting of this doctrinal and ecclesial manifestation, in the subjects thereof, being made like to what Jesus Christ now after their emergence from their graves: "the manifestation of the sons of the Deity," at the near and thief -like advent of CHRIST THE KING. These all constitute the one YAHWEH ELOHIM, or Christ and his brethren, "the Saints;" as saith Moses, "Hear, O Israel, YAHWEH (He who shall be) our ELOHIM (Mighty ones) is ONE YAHWEH." The ultimate, complete, and final manifestation of the YAHWEH-NAME is the development, during the thousand years ensuing upon the end of the times of the Gentiles, of an intelligent, faithful and righteous multitude, which shall attain to perfection at the end thereof -- "The name of Yahweh, saith Isaiah, "cometh from afar." The prophetic and apostolic testimony concerning the Christ, or Messiah (in English, the ANOINTED ONE) is the exposition of this name, because Christ is "Deity manifested in flesh." To "believe on his name" is to believe intelligently that testimony concerning the Christ.rnrn[Proof: Exod. 3:13-15; 6:2-3; Isa. 7:14; 9:6-7; 30:27-28; Jer. 23:6; Luke 1:31; 13:32; John 20:17; Heb. 2:10; 5:9; John 17:5, 24; Acts 1:3, 11; 1 Tim. 3:16; Acts 15:14; John 5:29; Rom. 1:5; 8;19, 23; 14:10, 12; 1 Cor. 15:28; Eph. 4:6; Rev. 21:3; Rom. 3:25; 1 John 1:7; 2:2]rnrnrn“The way by which believers may take this name upon them exists in the ordinance of baptism, which, according to the divinely appointed formula, introduces "into the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit." Says the Apostle, "As many of you as have been baptised INTO Christ have PUT ON Christ" (Gal. 3v 27). Having put on Christ, they have put on the name of the Father, and the Son. and the Holy Spirit, inasmuch as Jesus is a manifestation of the Father, in the Son, by means of the Holy Spirit. Those who are thus invested no longer stand in the nakedness of the natural man, but are "found in HIM, not having their own righteousness . . . but the righteousness which is of God, BY FAITH."rnrnIn The Question of the Trinity and Matt. 28:19 ...rnrn “All but the most conservative of scholars agree that at least the latter part of this command (Matt. 28:19) was inserted later” (Tom Harper, For Christ’s Sake, p. 84)rnrn“Critical scholarship, on the whole, rejects the traditional attribution of the tripartite baptismal formula to Jesus and regards it as of later origin. Undoubtedly then the baptismal formula originally consisted of one part and it gradually developed into its tripartite form” (The Philosophy of the Church Fathers, Vol. 1, Harry Austryn Wolfson, 1964, pg 143).

United Arab kingdom is the new European Mecca, send them to Israel ,the cause of all our problems!!!! Julius Stretcher was right when he wrote, The Jews are our misfortune.

end of the age

Truth can be very polarizing. But not everything is under Soro’s control. This particular theory seems more like a vessel for some individuals to cope with reality. Is my whole thing