JIM FETZER Michael Decon, "End of Days" (10-25-19) Impeachment,Epstein and Pizzagate

Video Transcript:

you you you- Well, it's been a lot going on. I got to say Michael a lot more than I ever anticipated. I thought I was going to wipe the slate clean with a summary judgment hearing because I had proof that my assertion that the death certificate was a fabrication was indeed a fabrication and therefore since truth is an absolute defense against defamation. I felt the case would be dismissed in my favor instead, even though I had a very thorough explanation of how we knew the death certificate is a fabrication, including that it doesn't have a file number, that it doesn't have a town certification, that it doesn't have a state certification. And in Connecticut, not even parents are allowed to have death certificates that are uncertified as was this death certificate. But I had two forensic document examiners, both of whom had issued formal reports, both of whose credentials were extremely imposing, both of whom it concluded that not only was that death certificate, which I had published in the book and commented upon a fabrication, but that three other death certificates that had surfaced during the course of the trial were also fabrications. In fact, the first of the two document examiners Larry Wixstrom from Minnesota told me and wrote essentially in the same spirit that it was mind boggling to discover that a state of Connecticut was issued in fabricated death certificates and indeed different fabricated death certificates to parties to the same litigation, which was reinforced by Ash Robertson from California, who not only agreed all four of the death certificates were fabrications, but that it also taken a look at the Social Security card for the Noah Posner and that it was a fake. And he added that anyone who would examine that document and noticed what I had noticed and published in the book, who as a reasonable person would have reasonably concluded the death certificate was a fabrication so that that two counted in my favor. Meanwhile, we also have the research of Moana, Alexis Pressley on a passport, which as well as a death certificate lettered Posner had posted, where the passport photograph was obviously in the wrong proportions to be bona fide. It was a snapshot, he's looking to the side, takes up much too much of the space. The Department of State is very, very specific on the mathematical dimensions of the passport. It doesn't even require an expert to determine that the passport was a counterfeit. So you got a fabricated death certificate, you got a fake Social Security card and you had a counterfeit that passport, all of which was evidence in my case and nevertheless, Judge Ruled against me just set my evidence to the side and ruled in favor of the plaintiff completely outrageous, particularly insofar as summary judgments are only permissible when there are no disputed facts. And in this instance, the central issue before the court, namely the authenticity of the death certificate was obviously disputed and therefore the matter had to be given to the jury so that right now I have been set up for this fabulous judgment. Would you believe they even put a photograph of the little Noah Posner up on the screen? Really? Oh yeah. And they were all emotional, the attorney for the plaintiff's fake tears about this little boy who died at Sandy Huck, where as a judge had precluded me from introducing any of the voluminous evidence I had that Sandy Huck was a FEMA drill that no one had died and it was done to promote gun control. All that was excluded, but they were entitled to bring an emotional evidence about this little boy who purportedly died at Sandy Huck and I was the monster who'd antagonize and harass the father and get this. They had a two-hour video, no, it was not two hours, but an hour, less than two hours, but it was a lengthy video deposition from a psychiatrist who had never even met the Leonard Posner who diagnosed him over the phone and based on basis diagnosis on hearsay, what he'd been told about me and my relation to him, he was told I discerdated that Leonard Posner had faked the death certificate, which I had not. I discerdated that death certificate was fake, not that Leonard Posner had faked it. He was told I'd harass Leonard Posner, I'd never harass Leonard Posner, he was told I'd have phone calls with Leonard Posner, I never had phone calls with Leonard Posner. He told me I'd denied even had a son, which wasn't quite to the point what we had discovered was that the photographs, you may or may not recall Michael, but at the time of the event, the medical examiner Wayne Carver explained to the public that the parents weren't allowed to see the bodies of their children, but they were identified on the basis of photographs, that turns out to have been especially appropriate in this case, because the kids only existed in the form of photographs, no Posner in particular. By the way, Jim, can I just pause you for one moment just to address something very quickly with you? You have received some criticism in terms of your book. Many of those criticisms come from a specific photograph you used, where some people are claiming that you quote unquote, quote, purposely used low quality, quality versions of these photographs in question. Is that true? No, it's not true. And here's an easy disprove. The book is available. I release it for free as a PDF. All you have to do is put into your browser. Nobody died at Sandy Hook, PDF, and you can download the book for free to your own desktop. Let me point out that there's a great advantage in doing that, the PDF, because then you get all the photographs in color, and you can expand them. You can zoom in whatever you like, study any of the photographs. The initial printing of the book, the first edition was only in black and white. So you have got a great advantage. They were basing their lawsuit on the second edition, even though the same claims were made in the first edition, to try to circumvent statute of limitations claims. Three of the sentences came from chapter 11, and they were all my saying that the death certificate was a fabrication. The fourth sentence of which I was sued appeared in a memorandum I authored in 2018 that appeared in a memorandum series on Sandy Hook for the President of the United States edited by Robert David Steele. And then I would observe that there were some 34 memorandum, each of which was only three or four pages. And collectively they reinforced all the conclusions that which we derived in the book. And it's first and second edition. There's no significant point on which there's any contradiction at all. We got it right from the beginning, Michael. Yes, sir. That's just one of the many criticisms. Those on the outside looking and have made and lots of these criticisms come from newer people just discovering who you are. And as you know, Jim, I'm sure you're well aware by now. You made headlines all over the place. National news. My friend. Oh, not just national was international. In the world, there was a lot of times of Israel. It was in the Daily Mail in the UK. New York Times watching the post, but it was nonsense. It was rubbish. It was a fabricated case. If war no resemblance to reality. And you're claiming these are people who are new to the case. Well, I guarantee that's not going to be true. They have a whole they got hundreds of operators who are posting remarks that are supposed to undermine the look, Michael. What is the the objection to having 13 experts come together. This is what I do. I bring experts on all these cases. I've done it with JFK. I've done it with 911. I've done it with Sandy Hook. I've done it with the Boston bombing. I've done it with Orlando. I've done it with Charlottesville. I've done it with Parkland. I bring together the best experts in this case. Sandy Hook. 13 experts. Six PhDs. Currents are retired PhD professors. And we concluded we discovered we established we proved the school had been closed by 2008. It was loaded with his best as another biohazard. Damaged by a hurricane, it turns out there was even a major flood in the year in 2007. We've had a completely independent confirmation by the way that showed up on a blog white contractor who visited the school in 2010. He was staying with a friend in Merot who was a nearby location who was going over to pick up some school deaths for his kids to use on the cheap. And he just explained the appalling condition of the school. This is in 2010, mind you, where the shooting is alleged to have taken place in 2014, but we concluded the school was closed by 2008 on a multiplicity of evidential grounds. We have video of the condition of the school and it was completely appalling. It wasn't even in conformity with the Americans for Disability Act. It didn't have any handicap parking. It didn't have wheelchair accessibility. It didn't have restrooms that were wheelchair usable. In other words, in 2012, this school could not have been legally operating as a public facility because it was out of compliance with the American for Disability Act conditions. The law. So I mean, look, the proof is massive. They're trying to play you, Michael. Believe me, I do my homework. I have published two dozen plus academic works on serious subjects and nature scientific knowledge, the foundations of computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, evolution and mentality. My work has received many awards. I've been given distinguished professorships and research grants, including from the National Science Foundation. I was rewarded the medal of the University of Helsinki for my research on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge. I mean, look, I graduated from Princeton in philosophy when Princeton was ranked number one in the world in math physics and philosophy. My undergraduate thesis received an academic prize as a best essay in logic or the theory of knowledge. I have a history of accomplishment as an academic admission. My standards did not change when I began applying all of my background in epistemology, methodology and the philosophy of science to taking apart these controversial complex public events such as the assassination of JFK, the atrocities of 9-11 Sandi Hook, the Boston bombing and so forth, by bringing together other experts. None of this, not a single word I assert is merely my own opinion. This is the consensus of experts who've actually studied the case. And you're talking about shells and trolls who go out there to try to undermine it. This is such a big deal, Michael. Oh, it is a big deal. Yes. Yeah, they're worried that if Sandy Hook falls apart, that the public is going to be aware how much they've been scammed again and again and again. Let me just give you an illustration about the moon landing. We have a photograph that was supposed to be taken of the earth from the moon. But some may notice that the approximate dimensions are the same as the moon from earth because that's what they use. They use a photograph of the moon from earth and then made it into the earth as though it would take in from the moon. Earth has 20 times the dimensions of the moon. A photograph of earth from the moon would have been overwhelmingly enormous, not this little tiny thing. I mean, that's how blatantly they've got away with a scam about the moon landing. We didn't have the propulsion power. We didn't have the communication capacity. We couldn't have negotiated the Van Halen radiation belt. People may not have even thought about it, but we're talking about a distance of roughly 250,000 miles and yet the president of the United States, then Richard Nixon, didn't even have a sound delay when he's talking with the astronauts. That's because they were out in an area like 51. It was really right here under it. It would have been 250,000 miles away. There would have been a long, lengthy time delay. Look, you get that even sometimes with long distance right here under. The whole thing was an enormous scam. What I do, Michael, is on behalf of the American people who don't have the background or the ability, they don't know how to conduct research. I bring together the best experts to sort out what really happened and then we publish it for the benefit of the American people. It would you believe of the 12 books that have been published at moonrockbooks.com Amazon has banned six. Amazon has banned six of our books because they blow apart the official narrative. They not only banned the book on Sandy Hook, that was the first, then they banned the book on the moon landing and on the Boston bombing, the second and third, and now they have banned three more on Charlottesville, Parkland and Orlando and Dallas. Michael, they have banned them. Look, if you want to know what happened, you've got to go to moonrockbooks.com. That is your conspiracy catalog. If you want serious conspiracy research, I have pioneered this technique of collaborative research among experts. That is what I have done. That will do my lasting legacy and they haven't known how to cope with it. They had to contrive this completely phony lawsuit by focusing on a death certificate and rigging the situation so I was not allowed to bring in the mass of evidence that nobody died at Sandy Hook from which it follows obviously. Therefore, any death certificates for victims at Sandy Hook would have to be fabrications. I wasn't allowed to introduce any of that. I was about to ask you about the evidence if you were even allowed to even plead your case. Basically, I wasn't allowed to plead my case. There's quite a brilliant article by Kevin Barrett entitled The Legal Linching of a Truth Secret Jim Fetzer Stalinist Style Show trial at the unz.com website. It is fascinating. It's a really wonderful article. The unz review of October 17, 2019. It's in two parts. Part one, Tuesday at the trial, just the facts. Then he has a part two of his opinions if he's still allowed to give them. It's wonderful. It's got nearly 500 comments on it. What's striking about this Michael? These are serious comments. These aren't flip-offs. This isn't the kind of thing you find on most websites. These are serious people. Anyone who went through this article and read a lot of the comments would get an education of what Sandy Hook was all about. Understood. Jim, how are you holding up mentally? Are you good? Nothing is too troubling for you, my friend. Oh, man. I'm astatic. They overplayed their hand, Michael, Jay. Look, I had two witnesses standing by. And because the issues were narrowly drawn about these four sentences, my attorney and an attorney he had assisting him at the trial advised me. They thought we had a stronger case because it was so tenuous to have a connection between these sentences and this work and the allegation that it induced PTSD in the man. I mean, look, the witness, their key witness and expert was testified by a video deposition. And his testimony was based on hearsay, what he'd been told by the plaintiff's attorney and by the plaintiff himself. He never even confronted a plaintiff face to face. He diagnosed him over the phone. And he had been told that I had harassed him when I'd never harassed him, that I'd had phone calls with him, when I'd never had phone calls with him, that I had claimed he had fabricated the death certificate, which I had not. I'd only claim the death certificate was a fabrication, not that he had done it, that I denied the existence of his son. Well, that's more complicated because you may recall at the time that Wayne Carver, the medical examiner explained they didn't allow the parents to observe the bodies of the children in the school, but only identified them using photographs. And that turns out to have been crucial because the kids were, fictions made up of photographs of older kids when they were younger. In the case of Noah Posner, they were made up of the person who was supposed to be his older stepbrother Michael Fabner when he was a child. Kelly Watt, who was one of the two witnesses who were standing by that we didn't actually call to testify, had noticed a striking resemblance between Noah and Michael Fabner, who's supposed to be his older stepbrother. And so six of us went to work and we created a blog where we discovered they had the same eyes, they had the same eyebrows, they had the same nose, they had the same mouth, they had the same ears, they had the same shape of skull. So I sent photographs of a photograph of Noah and a photograph of Michael without identifying who they were, nothing about the contacts. To Larry Rivera, who has mastered the principles of photogrammetry, which is the application of mathematics to the study of photographs, Larry had done brilliant work in JFK where we had already in the course of the collaborative research I was doing on JFK. And this is all my more recent work since I published the three books that shattered the cover-up Assassination Science 1998, Murder and Dele Plaza in 2000, and the Great's Improoter Film Hokes 2003, which demonstrated that the government's case was all built on manufactured, fabricated evidence altering the Zapruder film and a whole bunch of other stuff. The X-rays had been patched, a blow up to the back of the head had been patched using a material much too dense to be human bone, that the brain-jowning diagrams and photographs in National Archives wasn't even of the brain of JFK, that there was evidence of a second shot to the head that this is a prudent film had been massively edited. Actually, the original film would have had about a thousand frames, what we have now is 487. So they've removed more frames than we have left in the accident film. They removed about a hundred, turning from Houston onto Elm because the driver William Greer sawing out too widely and nearly hit a concrete abutment had to pause and then get back into line. And then subsequently when the president had already been shot in the back and shot in the throat but he was still alive, William Greer, the driver pulled the limousine to the left and do a halt to make sure JFK would be killed. He was at that point hitting the back of the head, slump forwards, Jackie used a backup and he was hitting the right temple by a bullet that was a transible or exploding that set up shockwaves that blew his brains out the back of his head with such force that when they hit the motorcycle, the trauma and Bobby Hargas riding to the left rear, he initially thought he himself had been shot. Well, Larry Rivera, rediscovered and transcribed interviews that were done with the Ford motorcycle escort officers and their supervisor, Stavis Ellis, all of them confirmed that the limousine had been brought to a halt. That officer Hargas had dismounted his bike run between the secret service vehicle and the presidential vehicle up to the grassy knoll that officer Douglas Jackson riding on the right had motored up the grassy knoll and we have photographs or you can see the imprint of the wheels of his motorcycle until it fell over and then he proceeded on foot. Five secret service agents that exited their secret service Cadlacks surrounded the presidential limousine. One of them picked up a chunk of skull from a little boy and threw it in the back seat. I calculate this had to have taken as long as 20 seconds. I can't find a lesser amount of time that can account for all those activities. One, 18.3 frames per second, that's another 400 frames. So we have more frames missing from the extra film than are available in what remains. More frames missing from the original than what remains in the extra film and in itself has been altered to conceal the blood at the back of the head where I inferred that they were spending so much time blacking it out, literally blacking it out in early frames that they might have overlooked. It could be visible in later frames and I found in frame 374 you can actually see the blow out at the back of the head. Larry has now discovered that Jackie's gloves, her white gloves outlined the defect in even earlier frames. This is all sensational stuff since I published first three books and you can find it in JFK who, how and why at Moonrock books, which amazingly they haven't banned and in Larry Rivera's own book also at Moonrock books, The Four Horsemen about the Four Escort officers and about his brilliant work in identifying that Leo Oswald was a man in the doorway. We'd already known it was Lee from the height the way to build the shirt and the t-shirt he was wearing, the man in the doorway in the photograph, which were the same as the height the way to build the shirt in the t-shirt of Lee Oswald when he was arrested. In fact, they were so conscious of the resemblance they had him take off his long sleeve, richly textured but very worn over shirt and photographed him for the mugshot only in the t-shirt because they didn't want people to notice the resemblance. The government claimed that the man in the doorway was in fact Billy Lovelady, a co-worker of Lee's who said he thought that was very odd because he was two to three inches shorter, 50 to 20 pounds heavier. And the FBI in fact had called him in on the 29th of February 1964, wearing the same shirt he'd been wearing at the time, which was a short sleeve red and white burically striped shirt, completely unlike the shirt of the man in the doorway. So he knew it was Lee Oswald in the doorway, which obviously means not only can he not have been the lone-demanded gunman, he cannot have been one of the shooters, what Larry did was to find suitable photograph to do a superposition on the facial features of the man in the doorway to confirm it was Lee Oswald because they fit him hand in glove and not Billy Lovelady, the ears are wrong, the jaws are wrong, the nose is wrong. I mean it's clearly Lee Oswald, but this is brilliant work. So I sent him a photograph of no a posner in a Michael Vander without identifying who they were. He didn't know anything about Sandy Hook, I never really talked to him about Sandy Hook. He had no idea, I just asked him are these the same person and he did the superposition he created a gift just that he created gifts where you can see that the man in the doorway was Lee Oswald and another gift and you can see the man in the doorway is not Billy Lovelady. He created a gift where you can see no a posner turn into Michael Vander. All this I presented to the court, none of it was accepted by the court. I mean I'm telling you it was stunning. Yeah, that's ridiculous if they didn't even look at any of the evidence that you had to present and if that is correct, is that that's correct? We were telling us here that's ridiculous, sir. Well, of course, you know, I'm only interested in the truth. That's what I am, Michael, I'm a truth junkie. What I do is I care about the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to the extent that when I was called as a hostile witness during the trial, I mentioned I made a statement under oath, right? I'm there. I'm swearing to tell the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. They put me up to stand and something comes up about the defamatory statements and I say, well, the allegedly defamatory statements were not in fact a family because contrary to the ruling of the court, they were true. The judge had a fit. He sent that jury out of the room. He reprimanded me when he called them back in. He repeated what I said and instructed the jury to disregard it had been stricken from the record. But my position was, hey, I was there under oath. I'm going to tell the truth. Yes. And it says here in the Sarticle way, Wisconsin judge, her jury brother has ruled that James Fetzer retired professor from the University of Minnesota Duluth, must pay Leonard Posner, 450 big ones for accusing him of forging his son Noah's death, Noah's death certificate. What kind of dog is that by the way? What kind of what? I said, what kind of dog is that by the way? What kind of dog? I thought I heard a barking sound. A barking sign. No, I was laughing. That's just me. I thought there was a dog in there. I blocked the reporter for the Wisconsin straight journal stuck a mic in front of me and said, when did I think of the damage award? And I said, absurd. It's absurd. It's completely absurd. I made a true statement about a death certificate in a book and they created a fabricated case and they can impose a penalty of 450,000. Look, Michael, that might be my wet. That's a lot of warning. But all that I have is based upon my retirement and social security. They cannot take my assets to settle this judgment because my assets because they're derivative for my retirement account and my social security. They can't take them. So I've got a 450,000 dollar judgment. Yes. But I have now the right to appeal in the judge committed this very blatant violation of due process and relation to summary judgments. Okay, under the law is very well known. I mean, a first year law student knows that summary judgments are easily abused and that especially in a defamation case because it's such a subtle matter to judge whether someone has in fact been defamed or not. They're only permissible when there are no disputed facts. When this instance of death certificate itself, which was a central issue, the authenticity of the death certificate was disputed, it did not have a file number. It did not have a town certification. It did not have a state certification. And it's a Connecticut law that not even parents are allowed to have death certificates that are uncertified. Not only that, but if I didn't already explain, I had two forensic document experts who confirm not only was it was that death certificate of fabrication, but three other death certificates that had surfaced during the course of the case were also fabrications. Such a, did I already say Larry Wicks from Minnesota, so it was mind boggling that the state of Connecticut was issued fabricated death certificates and different fabricated death certificates to parties to the same litigation. And that asked Roberts and the other forensic document expert from Los Angeles not only confirmed what Larry Wicks from had reported, but also added that the social security card is also a fake and that the any reasonable person looking at the points I'd made about the death certificate that I published in the book would have reasonably concluded that it was a fabrication. I mean, so I have all this massive evidence and the judge turns to me and asks me, he says, do you agree there are no disputed facts? And I said, no, that was a single most important word I uttered in the entire case from beginning to end. No, amazing. The judge, the judge is after discussing with the plaintiffs attorney and telling him if I strike the document experts reports, that'll be grounds for appeal. He said, I'm just going to set them aside as merely opinions. That's what he did. He set them aside as merely opinions that went ahead and issued a ruling in favor of the plaintiff as a court, as a court, as a summary judgment, which was a total violation of the protocols for summary judgment. It says right here, Mr. Fetzer's defamatory statements caused Mr. Posner severe mental stress in anguish disrupted his daily life and forced him to move several times, according to Mr. Posner's complaint. So basically every sort of person that ever went after him, he's blaming you for that. In my phone. That's right. That's right. He was even claiming that Alex Jones was propagating my ideas when Alex Jones admitted to his old episode. He never read my book. I find this was being laughable, Jim. I'm not quite sure what kind of case this was. I'm confused and perplexed by all this bullshit I'm hearing. It was a it was a show trial. It was a stall in the style show trial. That's where Kevin Barrett has it exactly right. It was purely political. This was political theater for beginning to end. Look at it. Look at the complaint, the initial complaint, Michael. The initial complaint had attached to it a death certificate, a state certified death certificate in the town certification and the state certification in a file number, a handwritten file number, and it even had a change that Leonard Posner, the father had made to the residents of Noah Posner in 2013. Now when's the last time you heard of a dead person changing their residents after their demise. I mean, this is how absurd it was. The death certificate he posted and shared with Kelly Wat was in 2014, which did not have any of those features had no file number, no town certification, no state certification. And as I may have already mentioned in Connecticut, not even a parent is allowed to have an uncertified death certificate, which he knew when he posted in 2014 was not the current version because he'd already changed the current version in 2013 by altering the residents of the scene. The after is dead. My God. This is hilarious. I mean, look, if the sticks weren't so enormous, it's a joke. This whole damn case is a joke. In fact, there are a couple of legal experts who went through the complaint and said literally that the case was a joke because I'd been sued for defamation over describing a death certificate as a fabrication, but defamation has got to be a statement made against a party, a person, not a document. So they didn't even have grounds for a proper defamation case, but they asserted in the original complaint, Michael, if you can believe this, that there was no material difference between the state certified death certificate, the attach to the complaint and the death certificate I published in the book with a death certificate I published in the book had no file number, no state certification, no town certification, which are material differences, which means this suit was absurd from the beginning completely indefensible. The only reason I went ahead to marsulet was because I had this mountain of evidence published in the book and elsewhere, including now the new Memoranda series of 2018, and I wanted to present it to the public through a judicial process where the public would know that indeed Sandy Hook had been a hoax that nobody had died and that it had been a female drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control, where we even had the FEMA manual, which is included in appendix, say anyone in your audience, I say you're hearing these nonsensical complaints about the images and so forth, you can download the book and look at it for yourself. They're making up phony names, they can do this effortlessly, they're putting a bunch of trolls out there to try to undermine the credibility of research that was done by 13 persons, including six Ph.Ds. And let me add, one of those who's not a Ph.D., Paul Preston, who has his own radio show, Agenda 21. He is himself a school administrator from the Los Angeles area. He supervised active shooter drills himself. He was so troubled by what he saw being broadcast from Newtown that day that he reached out to his contacts in the Obama Department of Education, all of whom assured him it had been a drill that no children had been harmed and it was done to promote gun control. That's in the book too. My goodness and Jim, you know, I hate to bring this up, but I have to admit something to you. One of my goals in bringing you on here, well not today, but one of my my longtime goals, long term goals rather, was to have you and your wife appear on the program just to have you too on. I thought it would be hysterical, but I think right now would not be a good time for that. I think she might be maybe a little bit of set with you, Jim. You've been a bad boy. Oh, are you kidding me? I mean, my family has virtually disowned me. I mean, they loved my work on JFK and they were with me with 9-11. But Sandy Hook for them has been a bridge too far. I mean, look, my wife is addicted to MSNBC. Oh, no. Yeah, and it's propaganda 24-7. All these issues, look, they're no more in the position to research what happened at Sandy Hook than the average American who's having a hard enough time putting food on the table and keeping a roof over their head. They don't, they, if they hear from two or three sources, a bunch of kids were killed at Sandy Hook. They believe it. But they don't have any comprehension that this could be a staged event that the government's behind it. They're, that they're conducting fake school shootings as acts of terrorism in order to instill fear into the population to make us more amenable to the political manipulation of remote their agenda. All right. I mean, so that's why I got involved in this because it was evident to me that there were even persons of prominence who were participating in the political charade in this instance back in 1992. It was the editor in chief at the Journal of the American Medical Association, a guy, my name is George Lundberg, who gave a press conference where he denounced everyone I knew who'd done serious work on JFK and Oliver Stone's film is Docu Fiction. When I knew what was the most accurate, complete comprehensive presentation, what actually happened in Dele Plaza on 22 November, 1963 ever presented to the American people for the mass media. Yeah. Now, Oliver didn't get it all right. But what Lundberg was saying was completely wrong. And it was at that point that I decided that if someone of his aminets were going to abuse his journal for political purposes, perhaps some of us with special background and ability had to become involved. And that's when I reached out to a fellow I'd never met from a letter complaining about the abuse of the journal by the name of David W. Mann who had both a PhD in physics from Wisconsin and MD for Michigan board certified in radiation oncology, which is a treatment of cancer involving x-ray therapy. So as an expert in the interpretation of x-rays, I reached out to David and suggested we collaborate on a long article or a book and he agreed he was about to enter the National Archives and he told me that he'd find both evidence of a second shot to the head and evidence that the autopsy x-rays had been altered he discovered both. See, what we were doing was practicing the methodology of falsification is amadvocated by the great British philosopher science called popper who says the only way you can acquire evidence that would support a theory is by failing to falsify it. In other words, you have to try to falsify it and then if you're unsuccessful in falsifying it, you know that it might be true or else you've simply not figured out the right way to falsify it. After all, look at it this way. You can have billions of pennies that are all copper in support of the proposition that all pennies are made of copper and yet in 1943, pennies were made out of steel because there was a copper shortage during the war. Or you could produce billions of people in support of the claim that all human beings are female and if you don't bother to look at all the evidence, you could make a powerful proposition or you can argue, all the numbers are odd numbers by producing one, three, five, seven, nine, only producing the odd numbers. I mean, it's that blatant. It's called special pleading selecting the evidence only present that evidence favorables your side. There's multiple, there's multiple genders now, by the way, Jim. Oh, it's absurd. Oh, it's absurd. My goodness, yes. This is not their teaching children. They can choose what sex they are. I mean, how, how does God's team? I mean, this is just a verdict. It is present. It's my adults who are themselves, you know, a, you know, weird way who want to feel more comfortable about themselves by making out that they're on state is normal. I'll tell you the most stunning case of this is Michelle Obama. Her name was Michael Robinson. She played football at Oregon State before she transferred to Princeton and adopted a female persona and began recalling herself. Michelle Robinson. Oh, my goodness. Now, one of her, the campaign manager who was looking after her in Trent walked into her in a, in a, in a dressing room while she was taking a leak standing up. And he was paid millions for his silence, but reviewed decided he could keep this from the American public that Michelle Obama is a man with breast implants. Barack Obama, of course, had was well known for his, his homosexual activities in Chicago. He had a torrent relationship with Robin Manuel, well known in the bath houses in Chicago. And so that, when he moved into the White House, he brought Robin Manuel along his chief of staff. Are you telling me that President Obama was a foot tap or gym without any question? Get this. What are the most stunning revelations that came out of the, the, you know, laptop, preventing a weiner where all these John Boone, S.D. emails about pizza gate, one of which said that Barack Obama had flown hot dogs and pizza in from Chicago for a $25,000 private party at the White House in the language of pedophiles hot dogs are little boys and pizza little girls. So he flew little boys and little girls from Chicago into the White House for a, a pedophile party. And just just think on the face of it, how absurd it is. We got this email about Barack Obama flying hot dogs and pizza in from Chicago for a private party for, well, I think it was $35,000. That was taxpayer money. The White House was not allowed food to be served in the White House. It comes from the outside. Number one, number two, if you're flying in pizza and hot dogs from Chicago, obviously they're not going to be fresh and not going to be hot. I mean, it's a stupid idea to take it literally. I'm glad you brought that up. I do want to explore that deeper. But before we do, you mentioned MSNBC. I did want to know what your issue with them was. Not that I'm a listener or a viewer of that sort of thing, but I do want your opinion on MSNBC and what kind of, I guess you could say in other words, how would you break them as a news network? And Jim, I also want to ask you in your opinion, which news source or media outlet can we trust now today? All those, but let me give you some background. The CIA began infiltrating the media back in the 1950s. It's called Operation Boxing Bird, such as by 1975 already. Then director William Colby testified to Congress that the agency owned everyone of any significance in the media. This was already 1975. We know many of the newspapers and journal, the newsmen who are reporting about the Kennedy assassination were working for the CIA, some of whom were rather famous at the time, including one Maryman Smith, who grabbed the mic to report that there had been three shots fired. Well, actually there were eight, nine, 10, 12, maybe 13 shots fired, only three shots were fired from the Dal from the Daltex with a non-silence weapon. That was the only unsilence weapon that was used to create the acoustical impression. So you had newsmen at the time who are issuing reports to bolster the official line because the CIA was so deeply involved in the assassination of JFK. Carl Bernstein followed up with a report in Rolling Stone in 1977 on the CIA in the media where he quoted high officials of the agency who are boasting that their greatest successes have been with time, life, the New York Times and CBS. If you had control of time, life, the New York Times and CBS, you had a lock on the American news media. Today it's much, much worse because the Mossad has moved in in a big way into the American media such that I have a panel of a hundred executives from CNN, all of whom are dual U.S. Israeli citizens. Another panel of a hundred executives from NBC, all of whom are dual U.S. Israeli citizens. Another panel of a hundred executives from the New York Times, all of dual U.S. Israeli citizens, would you believe just tonight I got a report, Donald Trump has captured, canceled the federal government subscriptions of the Washington Post of the New York Times, because there are publishing nothing but fake news. I believe it or not, the New York Times is our nation's newspaper of record, meaning what you read in the New York Times is supposed to be the official newspaper of the official history of the United States. I have been calling the New York Times the Langley newsletter for five or six years, Michael. And I'm telling you, MSNBC is infiltrated by the CIA, so is CNN, only partially Fox. It's remarkable because I used to look down on Fox as being propagandistic. The one single best show worth watching on Fox is Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson has a great mind. He's a little naive about conspiracies. He made the little children actually died at Sandy Hook, but I'm telling you, he is a single clearest intelligent mind on television today. Rachel Manoe, Lawrence O'Donnell, and a host of others, not to mention Anderson Cooper, Wolf Blitzer, those are old CIA folks, the ones on MSNBC are newer CIA folks. Those are a brilliant guy, Keith, had that show, you know, we did that just a completely brilliant show. This guy used to be a sportscaster. Why is his last name slipping my mind when they brought in Rachel Maddo, that was getting rid of the one brilliant mind who is dissecting the news and putting it in installing a female, a feminist, a lesbian to be the new vote to give us fake news. That's all she does. Rachel Maddo is absolutely 100% propaganda. I believe she was a radio host before she moved on to tell her Keith Obriment. Keith Obriment is completely brilliant. His show on MSNBC was a single most brilliant news program ever to appear in American television ever. Period. Tucker Carlson is the best show on today, but Keith Obriment was better than Tucker. He was so brilliant. He was so methodical. The guys, oh, we might have lost Jim here. And Jim went silent. I don't know what happened to him here. The gym get cut off. Uh-oh. Folks, we have a bit of an issue here. It seems like we might have been dropped. I'm not sure. Maybe someone had a MSNBC condom caught wind of a gym going crazy there and got very angry with Mr. Jim Fetzer here. Who knows, but yes, he went silent. I don't know. Let's give him call back and see if he's alive this time. Yes, I'm sorry, ladies and gentlemen, we are having some technical difficulties with the one and only professor Jim Fetzer. And don't worry, boys and girls will oh, now he's sending me a message here. Let's see what he says. Yes, don't worry, Jim. I'll call you right now. Yes, as you can hear me typing this to Mr. Fetzer. Let's patch him back in here. Oh, yes. Jim, is that you? Oh, no audio from Jim. This is definitely not good. I think something must have happened to his microphone, boys and girls. I'm not quite sure what happened here, but I guess it's time to take a quick little break here and when I return, hopefully Jim Fetzer is back on the line. Stay tuned. Yeah. And welcome back. And here we are with Mr. James Fetzer. What's going on, Jim? Now we are back. We had a bit of an issue there. It seems like Mr. Posner was living inside your computer. He lives inside my computer. He's mucking with me all the time. It's absolutely amazing. Now he came out during the trial during the course of discovery and so forth that he's acknowledged, being responsible for removing 1,555 videos from YouTube. And you can imagine these are supposed to be about, you know, Sandy Hook skeptics because he's trying to preserve the good name of the poor victims of Sandy Hook. But don't you imagine in that 1,555 he found people making a whole lot of claims about him rather more traumatizing than the observation that the death certificate he had for Noah was a fabrication when since nobody died at Sandy Hook any death certificates for victims at Sandy Hook would have to be fabrications. I mean this was it was unbelievably stupid from beginning to end. And yes. And wearing during an interview gave with a guy in Europe whom we have identified as being involved in various false flag attacks in Europe. He boasted of having been responsible for removing tens of thousands of content items from the internet, tens of thousands of content items from the internet. And I was just starting to explain how we have a lip mistest about MSNBC and CNN and the major networks in relation to the Russia. The Russia gait allegations of Russian interfering with our election because it turned out was all fake. I even have a book about it. It's called exposing the Russia hoax. It's a short book but it's devastating. You can find it by Lulu. Check out LULU Lulu as the distributor worldwide. The Russia hoax. It's only about 132 pages long but it just takes the whole thing apart. And I think you can get it for less than 10 bucks. I mean telling you know there's something to consider. Yes Jim and of course that leads to the other question I had for you was what media outlet can be trusted. That's what I want to know. Personally I kind of like RT over a lot of them out there too. Just to be honest. There are three international news services that are highly reliable. RT formerly Russia today, Spotnik News and press TV which is the Iranian news service. I've been interviewed by press TV over a hundred times. They're totally reliable. They're very objective. They bring in all points of view. No censorship, no editing. Very, very good. Spotnik News highly reliable. They've interviewed me. Had right pieces. Several different times. Very good. And RT. Very, very good. My dear colleague Scott Bennett has been interviewed by RT and Spotnik News and press TV many times. I was actually the party who introduced a press TV to Scott Bennett and I was the first person to bring him onto the air with a radio show of his own because he's so very good with his background in in tell as a former Army and tell in Syop's office or he knows the score because he's a whistleblower. He was actually punished by the Army and was sent to a minimum security penitentiary for some form of malfeasance. It was completely manufactured but while he was there he was serving time with a fellow named Brad Merkinfeld who happened to know all the financing for 9-11. So well, Scott was in sconce in this low-grade federal penitentiary. He was putting together records about how 9-11 was financed what he would publish when he got out under the title Shell Game. So his radio show is called Shell Games plural. His book is called Shell Game. He shared it with many prominent politicians in Washington none of what whom want to have anything to do with it because it exposes what really was going on in relation to 9-11 where of course my own book reveals not only that the techniques that were used to destroy the twin towers were anything but a collapse. It was actually a demolition using nuclear devices so that the title of the book is 9-11. Let's see. Subtitle is a compliment to the CIA, the Neal Cons and the Department of Defense. The American nuke, America nuke on 9-11 compliments to the CIA, the Neal Cons and the DOD and the Department of Defense. I have an earlier book. The 9-11 conspiracy, the scamming of America where even the official narrative of course is of 19 Islamic terrorists is a conspiracy theory because all it requires is two or more individuals collaborating together to bring about an illegal end to have a conspiracy. So even on the government's account it's peddling conspiracy theory. Well look the Russia hoax was a monster conspiracy theory that had no foundation whatsoever. The Russians were intervening in our election. Even the chief executive of Google testified to Congress that the total amount of money Russia expanded on the election was like $4,700. That's about the money spent on a buffet for the executives at Google out in Silicon Valley. I mean it's all absurd and when Robert Mueller came to testify obviously didn't know anything about the case. He never heard about the Robert Steele the former British and del agent who fabricated the dossier, the Trump dossier, under the employee of Hillary Clinton and the DNC never heard of fusion GPS. He didn't know the contents of his own report. It was a calamity of disaster for the Democrats. So you notice you don't hear anything more about the Russia hoax because it fell flat. Now we get the Ukraine. Let me tell you about Ukraine. Donald, the Ukraine in the United States and the Ukraine have a treaty where they are supposed to assist one another in criminal investigation. Donald Trump within the framework of that treaty was asking for the assistance of Ukraine to look into criminal activities by Joe Biden in relation to his son where Joe Biden boasted about these criminal activities during the talking game of the council and foreign relations where he explained how he threatened to withhold a billion dollars in USA to Ukraine if they didn't fire the prosecutor who was looking into the Marisma gas company where his son Hunter had a position on the board of directors that had pushed me $50,000 a month, $600,000 a year for a position where he had no discernible qualifications. He gave him six hours to fire the prosecutor. It is he said right there before the council on part relation son of a bitch they did it. They fired him before he got on the plane to fly back. So if Joe Biden actually had openly boasting about committing the very offense they have sought to accuse Trump of having committed Biden actually did it. Trump did not. There was no quid pro quo even if this last testimony this last guy Taylor which was supposed to be so devastating. He was dismembered under cross examination. His testimony was all hearsay. He didn't have any first-hand knowledge and even the president of Ukraine is recognized there was no quid pro quo. It's all total bullshit but that's all the Democrats have the situation there in Michael is the following. As this guy this Democrat what is his name? Al Green from Texas observed if we don't impeach this guy he will get reelected. Trump has done so much to improve the economy. Unemployment among blacks and Latinos is at record lows. He's even bringing our troops back from the Middle East which is what got him elected in the first place. Now you even have establishmentarians like Mitch McConnell complaining about getting our troops out of Syria. Why? Because it wipes out all the drug dealing and other nefarious activities that are going on in the Middle East. This was really over two different competing pipelines each of which was going to pass through Syria. One of which was supported by the Israelis one of which was supported by the Iranians. That's what the whole war in Syria has been over. Conflicting pipelines. It's outrageous. The American people have never been known the facts of the matter. And now Russia has been negotiating a ceasefire between the Kurds, the Turks, and the Syrians. And we're going to have a lot of stability in the Middle East because Trump is pulling out as he promised the American people he would do. And I'll tell you something else. I think the hammer is about to fall on all these pedophile networks across the country. Trump actually promised a drain that swamp. I believe he's actually following through on that promise, Michael. By the way, Jim, I don't think I've ever really asked you too much about Jeffrey Epstein and how he sort of fallen off the radar with everything going on. It seems like the media is not really covering one Jeffrey Epstein anymore. Well, Jeffrey Epstein was a key player in all of this. The Lolita Express Bill Clinton had flown some 24 times on the Lolita Express. He had this little state James Island in the Caribbean. He wanted to rename a little St. Jeff after himself. He's a narcissist. He's been running in his Israeli intel off the whole purpose of this is to ensnare American politicians and improper sexual activities with children that he was recording and videotaping all over the island and on his plane so that you have some of the most prominent American politicians who are trapped here. Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi appeared to be among them. Of course, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and Huma Abbott, and but a whole host of others. That's why they're upset with Trump. He's actually cracking down. I had to interview with Jim Rothstein. He was an NYPD Gold Shield detective who'd cracked many of these pedophile cases in New York only find the district attorney quashed them and refused to send them to a grand jury on political grounds. When we started to get reports about the contents of the Anthony Weiner laptop which were particularly sorted and vicious, I mean truly disgusting and murdered. Where hardcore experienced New York detectives were reduced at tears because of what they found on those laptops. When I shared him with Jim Rothstein, I asked him where he surprised and he said no because based on his experience, 70% of the American political elite is engaged in pedophilia, 70%. So Jeffrey Epstein was like the Linchpin. They had to get rid of him. It appears to have been they had a power outage. There was a band showed up. They escorted him out in a wheelchair. I've heard reports that he's actually alive and well back on Lolita Island. Whatever they had to get him out because he was such a voluminous source of information about the corrupt deep state. Just how he's going to figure it all. This is at this point to me at least unknown. He may be attorney states evidence. He may be a witness for the prosecution. If that happens, it's going to be devastating for a whole lot of very prominent political figures here in the United States and the American people are going to be appalled, completely appalled. Very interesting. And of course, excuse me, Harvey Weinstein also someone who has been making the rounds yet again. He's been appearing more frequently in public. And of course, people have been approaching him and saying all sorts of things about him, which I'm sure some of it is. Well, you know, it's pretty pro. It's all disgusting beyond belief. I'm given to understand that Gwyneth Paltrow, who might just think as a lovely person, was his virtual concubine. I mean, it was just disgusting. How Harvey Weinstein was extorting sex from all these prominent figures. And you got to be very suspicious of anyone who speaks out in defense of Harvey Weinstein because all of this sexual, you know, he was a predator. He was a sexual predator is very thoroughly documented. So if you have a Miro street who's speaking out to defend Harvey Weinstein, you've got to give that a lot of thought. You got to scratch your head and ask, what did God's name is going on here? Yes, many sexual proclivities, indeed, with one Jeffrey Epstein. I'm glad we mentioned him, though, because he's been out and about. And again, more people have been piling on him. And of course, Mark Zuckerberg also, someone who took some heat as well, the Capitol Hill there being questioned by a vaccine waters of all people. And she was actually grilling him pretty hard as well as others. And something interesting that I think should be highlighted is the simple fact that he was also asked what he was going to do in order to stop all the sex trafficking. And for those that don't know out there, a lot of these things were being done through various methods. And of course, Facebook is one of the more popular ones, as you can imagine. Well, it's very interesting because Zuckerberg seemed to me to be performing relatively admirably much better than I would have expected because he was speaking out about in opposition to censorship and then doing something about that sort of illicit sexual activity. From what I caught, and I haven't, because I've been so tied up with so much help, no, there's so much to be able to sort out exactly what happened today, but from what I can tell you, I've quit it himself rather well, much better than I would have expected. Yes, I agree with you full heartedly on that one. And of course, going back to YouTube, I was going to ask you this as, well, you posted up an article stating that they removed all sorts of content out there. And of course, they, well, I shouldn't say they, I know exactly who hit my original YouTube channel. I believe that was because of a posner and your dealings with him at the time, which got my whole channel demonetized, but Jim, check this out, check this out. I don't know what happened, but just recently my original YouTube channel was demonetized. And I'm not quite sure why, but I did leave something in there that stated that I'm in California. And after that, all of a sudden, my channel was remanetized. Remanetized, well, that's very good. I am given information by sources who are much better connected than I that in fact, there's a lot going on behind the scenes. And that Trump really is draining the swamp. But I'm looking at the article you were referring to YouTube, removed 17,000 channels, 100,000 videos, 500 million comments for hate speech. Well, hate speech is any speech that disagrees with the official narratives. They hate that. So, you know, you got to understand that hate speech is a completely manufactured category. And look what happened in this trial. Basically, I was being sued for statements because they hurt somebody's feelings. Right. I was being sued because letter positive claimed I hurt his feelings by saying that the death certificate that he had circulated with a fabrication would in fact, it was a fabrication. It's hurt feelings are all manufactured, but suppose this case stands. If this case stands, then anyone who publishes anything could be sued for someone no matter how distantly related having their feelings hurt. I mean, this is the greatest threat to the First Amendment ever in our history. And that's why I've created a donation of website at jamesfetzer.com. My website is at jamesfetzer.org. That's my blog. But now I have a new website for donations at jamesetzer.com. And it's not to pay off the $450,000. I couldn't do it. I'm not going to do it. I don't expect this going to have to be done. Yes. Because the case I'm almost certain is going to be overturned on appeal. I need money to conduct the trial. I was denied by being derailed by the summary judgment. So I can bring all my witnesses in a battery of attorneys to destroy the whole Sandy Hook myth. That's what this is all about. And refurbish and restore the First Amendment to its proper place. So if anyone out there thinks that's a worthy enterprise, no. If you go to jamesfetzer.com, you're not supporting paying off the $450,000. That's not going to happen. If to support the trial that I will have, what's the case is reversed on appeal? In my attorney, by the way, it's a very good appellate attorney. He's well-known by the appellate court. And I have no doubt in his ability to bring that objective about my goodness. Well, Jim, it's been fun talking to you. I don't want to take up too much of your time. I know you had a previous interview before this. So I can imagine you are very tired by this point. Well, Michael, I'd love being on with you. I truly do. You're my favorite host as I've told you before. Yes, sir. And it's just a great pleasure. And I just want to say that there is this monster threat to the First Amendment. Anyone who goes to my blog can see an article now by Kurt Nemo entitled Sandy Hook and the murder of the First Amendment. And if you go there to that blog and check that out, you'll see what this is all about. He didn't have all the facts exactly right. But I republished a post I'd put up on his blog when it first came out that correct sweats such details as he did not have right. So if you go to James Fetzer.org, you can see what it's all about. And if you think it's a worthy matter to stand up for the First Amendment, you can go to JamesFetzer.com and contribute. A few dollars would be fantastic. Nobody has to make a large dot. I want a large number of people to make very small contributions toward the goal of restoring the First Amendment in America. This lawsuit has that potential Michael. And where's that website again, Jim? JamesFetzer.com. JamesFetzer.com, ladies and gentlemen, if you want to help James Fetzer, you know what to do. Go and hit that donate button. Anything helps. Get it done, folks. Jim, once again, thank you so much for being a part of the program. And I look forward to the next time we do this again, sir. So do I, my friend? So do I. Thanks so much for featuring me again. I really enjoy it every single time. No problem. And God bless, Jim. Thank you. I take care. Bye. And there he goes, ladies and gentlemen, I'm sure it must blow his mind every time I say, God bless when he knows for sure that I am an agnostic atheist. Isn't that fun, folks? See, I love everyone. Yes. And all of you in the chat room as well. Thank you so much for being here. It's been a great time. And again, I do want to thank everyone in the chat room and those who will listen to this on a replay. Hello from the future to you. Yes, James Fetzer, a phenomenal guest and my goodness. Lots of I heat coming his way, making all those new sources, lots of people angry with Jim, whining his head, basically. They really do want to off that man. It's tremendous. Once again, I will be back this Saturday night. Oh, yeah, I'll be back. Don't worry. I know you can't get enough of this. I can't either. Much respect to all of you. I'll see you very soon. Stay safe no matter where you are on this island earth. I'm Michael Deacon. And with that said, the world is a mysterious place. And life itself is a mystery. Until next time, good night, everybody. I'm never gonna dance again. You'll see you beat out God. No rhythm. That was easy to pretend. I'm not a student. I'm better than to treat a friend. The way I stand is the chance that I've been here for. So I'll be gonna dance again. You'll see I dance with you. Tonight the music ships around. I wish that we could lose this crowd. Maybe it's bad this way. We've had each other with the things we want to say. We could have been so good together. We could have left this dance forever. But now, who's gonna dance with me this day? And I'm never gonna dance again. You'll see you beat out God. No rhythm. That was easy to pretend. I'm not a student. I'm better than to treat a friend. The way I stand is the chance that I've been here for. So I'll be gonna dance again. You'll see I dance with you. I'm better than to treat a friend. The way I stand is the chance that I've been here for. That you had to be alone. Oh Good night.