JIM FETZER "The Raw Deal" (10-4-18) Scott Henderson...more on moon landing hoax

Video Transcript:

This is Jim Fetzer. I believe we are on the air. We're having problems again technical. I don't think it's purely coincidental. This is taking place before I bring in my special guest today and you're going to get quite a bang out of this. I want to give an update about the latest on the Kavanaugh hearings as you all know. The FBI has completed its report. They interviewed some ten parties, not merely the four or five originally expected, but perhaps even more stunning is revelations from a former boyfriend who I publishes on my blog at JamesFetzer.org and recall my blog was obliterated last week just as I went to add an announcement that I was moving to a new blog. It was gone poof, completely gone, no warning, no notice, just disappearing. In any case I'm at JamesFetzer.org. Everyone seems to like the new blog. It's easier to read, it's easier to download, it's easier to access using smartphones and among those I have posted now, shock revelation. Ford's ex-BF boyfriend says she had no fear of flying, call you later, or living in a close space is help a friend prep for polygraph. In other words, she's been lying throughout her testimony is completely fabricated. Get this. Here's a summary. Christine Bailey Ford's ex-boyfriend shared a written declaration Tuesday stating, Ford never expressed a fear of flight, even while aboard a propeller plane had no problem living in a tiny apartment with only one door and helped her best friend prepare for a potential polygraph task despite claiming under oath she had done no such thing. Ford's ex also said she cheated on him and a year after they broke up she charges credit card for 600 bucks worth of merchandise. When confronted doctor Ford said she did not use the card but later admitted to the user after I threatened to invoke fraud prevention. Get this. Here's more. In a written declaration release Tuesday and obtained by Fox News Next, boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, directly contradicts her testimony under oath last weeks. You never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph exam. The former boyfriend whose name was redacted in the declaration also said, Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor mentions you as a victim of a sexual sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford going to great lengths to help a woman he believed was her lifelong best friend, prepared for a potential polygraph test. He added the woman had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and US Attorney's Office. He further claimed that Ford never voiced any fear of fraud flying even while aboard a propeller plane and seemingly had no problem living in a very small 500 square foot apartment with one door. Apparently, contradict your claims that she could not testify probably in DC because she felt uncomfortable traveling on planes as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanaugh's alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe being in a close space or one without a second front door. Now it's very interesting that this article goes on to show that they did have a second front door on their home but that it was well after before in 2007 there was only one door. In 2011 they had a second door but because they had an extra space they were ready now to attend it. So the whole thing is fabricated. The whole thing is phony. We have a conjecture by someone who's been following up on the case who had read the book by the friend of Kavanaugh and believes that she read the book and then organized her testimony around the book. Totally fraudulent. Trump was completely justified in lampooning it. I think that the Democrats are going to go down big a time. Now there's this interesting development. We have indications from Susan Collins and from Jeff Flake that they're happy but there's a senator from Tennessee named Sass who's indicating he may not vote for it. I do believe however there are a couple of Democrats who are going to find it very expedient to support this candidate including from West Virginia a very good guy who I think is going to wind up supporting him. I believe that there's not going to be a problem here Kavanaugh will be confirmed. It appears to be taking place on Saturday. Stay tuned. Meanwhile my special guest for today has been doing some brilliant work on the moon landing hoax. His name is Scott Henderson. He and I did an interview not very long ago. Let's see it was uploaded on September 20th initially to 153 news.net and then subsequently to Paul on the plane on the 25th of September interestingly the Paul on the plane upload has over 600 comments over 600 comments and we'll no doubt read a few because they're pretty interesting but what's got Henderson discovered and this is why I think this is also fascinating is that they actually shot the moon landing footage in a landfill. He identified a number of features of objects in the landfill even including an old Corvette. I'm very pleased to have as my feature guest today Scott Henderson Scott welcome to the raw deal. Thank you for having me on the show. I'm just delighted Scott why you give the audience a little background is how you became interested in the moon landing. Well I've always been interested in space and technology and everything like that right from the time I was in high school because when I started high school was in 1969 and of course our science teachers were very very active with the moon landings and they were showing us all of the footage and the MIT footage and all the development of it all through the four years I was in high school right it came up almost every day in there so just on that fact alone right the interest was there I've always been interested in space I've always followed it through and when I first started hearing about the fact that perhaps we didn't go to the moon right I became very curious and I started to research it myself and when I first started researching it I was still under the impression like everybody else that we actually went to the moon and when I started to find things that were were opposite to that claim I started researching further I had to find a form myself and as I got farther into it I ended up downloading every photo available I've read pretty much all of the documents that NASA has provided on their website the report server is very interesting because it shows all the test results and failures of the equipment as they were being developed and as I went through the photographs I started to discover where and how this simulation was prepared well it's really fascinating and for those out there want to follow up they can find it as I mentioned on either one five three news dot net or on Paul on the plane if you do a search for the real deal and that's the heading not the raw deal but the real deal which are my most of my video shows of the raw deals are being Tuesday video tape two and we're going to make them available through my new blog as soon as we get that set up if you do a search on the real deal one five three news dot net Scott Henderson or the real deal moon landings filmed in landfill or the real deal moon landing Scott Henderson you're gonna turn it up and I think you're gonna find it quite fascinating it's about an hour and thirty five minutes long in Scott I want you to go through you just point out a whole lot of your observations which are so astute about the objects you found in the landfill that gave you the clue as to what the world was going on here well the the very first things I started to find were the very unusual shapes right at the bottom in a Pellow 11 around the the lander legs and at the bottom of the ladder and stuff like that and I really it really wasn't connecting what it was I was looking at they just didn't look like natural formations of any kind and as I started to go through on the different photographs I kept finding more and more and more of them and as I zoomed in farther in on some of the photographs I started to find like the cars only and the other objects there's other heavy pieces of equipment in there as well on it so if you really look at it it's it's actually a scrapyard this way there's people keep calling the landfill like it's garbage and stuff like that but it's not okay yeah elaborate on it yeah yes like and it's and it's a military scrapyard it's used with and and and a NASA scrapyard so what you'll find in there is heavy pieces of machinery there's pieces of rocket engines there's actually old planes and everything else in there if you really wanted to start looking through it the ones that I displayed and showed on those photographs are very easy to see and you can see the old cars you can see like there's a nose cone of a missile or whatever sitting there and stuff like that it's got to get slumbered I mean every time you trip over one of these things you're just you're so stunning that the blatancy you know the Hutzpah to try to pull this rod off on not just you and me but the entire world not even just the American people the entire world yes well if if people are looking at them if you like all of all of the photographs I have downloaded come from the Apollo Archive site and that's where I've taken them down and there's usually two versions of the photograph there there's a standard JPEG and an HRJPEG and on some of the closer ground photographs if you take the the standard JPEG they are a little more detailed because the HR ones have been smoothed over a little more they're using a Photoshop effect on them to smooth out the the ground effects on photoshopping air brushing in a whole host of others forms of concealment and distortion that's right can't send the the ones on flicker are even more heavily photographed or Photoshop to do the effects not all of them though some of them are very very clear on on what there is and in particular in between the two even on the initial ones of Apollo 11 some of the objects in the ground have been either cloned over or blurred out and just between two on the same photograph between the JPEG and the HRJPEG you can see the difference where they've been cloned out and one in particular is right underneath this the garbage bag in Apollo 11 there's looks like an airborne for a truck or something with a big solid ground hole through the side of it and the entire thing has been completely cloned out in the HR version of it so if somebody saw it and decided to clone it out it means it shouldn't be there right if they're making trying to make it disappear it's it's not supposed to be there there it's not like NASA hasn't seen that these objects are in there okay they've been removing but they didn't get them all they didn't get them all in some of what you found is simply stunning I mean how do you how do you come to realize it one of the objects you were observing was was a Corvette well it's so distinctive I mean it wasn't hard to you don't even have to zoom in on it you can see it see it as an image full picture I mean I mean a lot of people are looking at these photographs on a phone okay and there's absolutely no way even a little tap litter something like that if you want to seriously look at these photographs sit down on a proper monitor and look at the photographs and be able to zoom in on them and take you time and look because I've noticed in a lot of the comments people are just going it doesn't look like this it doesn't look like that I know they're just looking at it on our phone right yeah and it's not a very very low resolution yes and it's not a good way to examine anything on a little tiny screen like that I mean I'm sitting with a 30-inch 4k monitor right and I can zoom in and everything is perfectly clear there's no distinction like there's there's no pixelation there's no anything going on when I can zoom in like that with it and if you even take one of the photographs that are in the presentation and just download even one of them and spend an hour looking through it you will see so much stuff more than what I've just shown in it because the entire ground is covered there's steps thinking out of them everywhere in all of the photographs Scott how did they think they could get away with this I mean it's so blatant well the the first thing is is the the photographs of course they were only using a few dozen for each mission for media purposes for magazines and National Geographic that kind of thing right and those were carefully selected and touched up well yeah yeah they were they set up they wanted to have a picture of the flag and the lander and the astronauts and all of that stuff and those would all be airbrushed in and color corrected and everything else right the rest of them were just archived and it wasn't until people were demanding to see more of them and of course NASA was always promoting space flight and stuff like that and they actually triggered the fact while showing us more photographs they came out and said well we've got a whole bunch of them and I think it was around 95 they put up few of the photographs up on their their website and by 1999 they had uploaded all of the photographs in the archives site and then three years ago they put the entire load on flicker as well which is little easier for people to see them if you're just taking a look at them but you actually have to download them so that you can zoom in and take a closer look at them even looking at them on flicker you don't see much right sure you know and as this what people are doing they're taking a quick look at them they're spending you know 10 or 15 seconds and going I don't see anything were you not going to see anything you have to study the photo study the detail okay I've looked at some of the comments and people are saying well I can't see any rust I can't see this or that on on some of the equipment well it you don't have to zoom in or anything and it only takes a second to see that there's absolutely nothing in that central station the one comment the guy is saying well there's nothing wrong with that does a fine piece of equipment right it's just it's just an empty box right nothing in the top and it's very apparent and I realize people want to make a comment and make this statement and they want to deny that you know that they didn't want to admit that they couldn't get to the moon they want to believe that it happens and I understand that I was a long time myself I wanted to believe it happening but I was looking at it so well I was first yeah my skepticism was first aroused when during a visit to London my wife and I were staying in the Morgan Hotel which backs onto the British Museum on Bloomsbury and I this was 2001 and I turned on one of the BBC channels and they were showing a brand new documentary entitled Conspiracy Theory did we land on the moon that was offering one scientific reason after another proving that we hadn't gone I mean for example that the astronauts walking on the moon you know it looked like they were in a low gravitational environment and yet it was just slow motion of a regular gravitational environment right here on earth it when they jump up they didn't jump nearly as high as they ought to have been able to jump in a in a gravitational environment only one six this strong is that on earth other showed that actually they were being lifted up by wires that were connected to their suits and you could actually see the wires I mean it was absolutely stunning stuff and since then I've done several interviews with Dennis Camino that have been very very positively received one on the on the real deal the moon landing hoax another on more on the moon landing hoax I myself did a summary overview for students about you know the moon landing and why we have to evaluate based upon distinctions between what's logically possible or an impossible what's physically possible and impossible and what's technically possible and impossible and the bottom line is we didn't have the propulsion power to go to the moon we didn't have the computing power in fact what they've given us is a computing diagram isn't even a functional computer we couldn't have coped with the Van L and radiation belt and more over in terms of communication ability a fellow involved in radio and television at the time observed in a comment on post I was making on Huffington Post in response to an odd comment they were touting were someone they celebrated as a famous physicist was saying anyone who doubts we went to the moon needs a brain transplant was observing that to help communicate in that day you need to abandon the size of a bread truck well we didn't find that on the moon what we find instead in the moon footages and an abandoned corvette that's part of a dump I mean it's absolutely fascinating what you've done Scott and I'm just so very pleased because you're these are such clear at powerful arguments we'll be right back with my special guest Scott Henderson don't let yourself be played check out and nobody died in Boston either available at moonrotbooks.com that's moonrotbooks.com what the heck is the truth jihad and Kevin there at host of truth jihad radio federal prosecutors be put at home land security agents and curious pastors by often ask me just what is this truth jihad thing anyway well everybody knows what truth is but jihad is a misunderstood term jihad means effort or struggle the greater jihad is the struggle to be a better person while the lesser jihad is the struggle to defend the community profit model in peace upon him did say that the best jihad is a word of truth long in the face of a tyrant and that's what we do here at truth jihad radio every Friday 8 to 10 pm eastern five to seven to ten right here on revolution radio find some comfort at willows world a variety of news commentary and poetry at willows poetry corner where there are conficutions and attempting selection of delectable commestibles a show that's square-colon quintessentially british where the unique twist featuring willow andrierson your host join willow Mondays and Thursdays 2 to 4 pm eastern time studio a the opinions expressed on this radio station it's programs and its website by the hosts guests and colon listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them they do not necessarily represent the opinions of revolution radio and freedom slips.com it's staff or philis you're listening to revolution radio freedom slips.com 100% listener supported radio and now we return you to your host oh this is that you answer that you're either wronged the ill with my special guest this god Anderson who's done a completely brilliant video about uh discoveries in the moon landing footage of evidence that it was done in a in a trash dump or a waste dump or I call it a landfill but it's got things that's not quite accurate I just want to mention for those who are interested in pursuing these issues that we just happen to have uh among the resources you might want to consider is the second edition of my book and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either which has some 15 contributors lots of different subjects address but most importantly here part the moon landings did we go in essay by Nick Colerston PhD doubts about Apollo what's interesting about Nick as he's a member of the Royal Astronomical Society uh he wants to believe we went but he's being overwhelmed by doubts sterling harwood is both a PhD and a JD the moon hoax nixens and the one because this was all actually taking place in his era wasn't possible to complete in that of JFK or even LBJ hardly surprising that tricky dick would be involved in this there's a sensational essay by Winston Wu the Apollo moon hoax 35 proofs we did not go that might be my favorite essay and then Jay Weedner with whom many of you are familiar faking moon landings the parallax experiments where he was suggesting that Stanley Kubrick had to do with it filming I think that Scott's discoveries may tend to undermine that belief but we also have now five new appendices including one by Dennis Camino who I've already cited where Dennis was the uh electronics the top electronics troubleshooter for the Navy before he left the Navy and went to work for Raytheon we weren't ready then and were never going to be because this appears to be an impossible project there's a whole lot more to which I shall return by and by during the course of our conversation Scott what was some of the most surprising among your discoveries well well of course the cars were absolute shocked when I found them when I when I also was finding things sticking out of rocks there's actually spark plugs and all kinds of automotive car parts that are sticking out of the ground everywhere right and large piece of machinery parts are in there as well on it but the one the staged setup of the gloves in the pile of dirt right because it shows clearly that the people involved in in designing the set were were showing the fraud and they designed that entire pile of dirt with a whole pile of gloves in it and they put the the grasping tool down to create an arrow to shoot that and I mean it's right there to look at you don't see it until you really start to study it and you realize what they've done that they're exposing the fraud. So just underline your observation Scott which appears to me to be very astute you believe those participating in this hoax one and the world to know they were leaving clues that would expose that was an elaborate deception they were doing so in a clever enough way that it deceived the director and the those who were doing the videography and filming that they not realize how much they were leaving ultimately devastating clues if you only recognize what you were looking at. I think I think the guys behind the camera whoever they may be they may have been the astronauts may have been the the actual people running those were documenting it in a very careful manner okay they wanted those they wanted these photographs kept they weren't like a lot of the files were disposed of a lot of it's missing all of these thousands of photographs were kept in archives okay they're there they're that that's where the documentation was they didn't have an opportunity to do it in any other fashion and this is the method that they were using to document this for the future they would have had no idea how long it would take to work to be fully exposed and then but it was there to be found at a certain time right and I think it's wonderful I'm interested in in your expanding on the thought that this was very carefully done to ensure that eventually the hoax would be exposed well some of the some of the photographs are so obvious that they are showing it to you because they're actually lifting rocks up turning them over breaking them open to show you what's inside okay they're showing you the different ways the the set was created by some of the rocks being prepared with a wire mesh underneath it right to create a cage and then they just covered them over from there that they show how the how the molding was shot on by standing a rock on edge and showing you the line that the mold was sprayed onto over top of the concrete or plaster rock that was created I mean that gets like when they dig it up out of the ground and show it to you okay it is quite intentional it's not like it was unintentional and they they were just out there and didn't know that that's what they were doing and when you're seeing about Weedner on his analysis of it okay yeah he is he covers an awful lot in a very technical as a film unlike as far as filmmaking goes and special effects and things like that there's a lot of special effects that had to be created for their in-flight shots that kind of footage like when they're descending down the the using miniatures and everything else right yeah all of that stuff all of that stuff is still there so all of the in-flight the docking undocking sequences and things like that they're traveling to the moon the their simulation of the separation and descent to the lunar surface right all of that stuff is very technical to to do as far as the simulation and he covers that very well to you yourself believe that Stanley Crude brick was involved in the project not at all no I believe I believe Nassos had simulators and studios largest studios in the world as far as movie making okay and it's still hard today that they're just used to to perpetrating frauds on the public right and left so they didn't need to have a high priced Hollywood film director involved in the project at all even though many regard you know his work on the 2001 space Odyssey has been virtually the perfect platform by virtue of the technical background he would have acquired and preparing to do the work and the sets he had to develop for that purpose to be adapted for the purpose of faking the landing well I'm sure he was sharing his knowledge with every other film producer out there as a certain time because even what he bore a camera from NASA that was uh would shoot in very low light stuff like that NASA developed it's their development their studios have developed it right they were the leader in the in the film industry right he might have been the best director out there right but the most creative ideas right and I'm quite sure that they were using the NASA is using the same techniques as well well there are so many proofs I mean for example and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either already in the prologue I'm talking about moon rovers that leave no tracks in the moon dust and of course we've got this contradiction because we see photographs of well-defined moot prints in the moon dust on the one hand and on the other we have moon rovers with no tracks before after or in the middle and either a moondust retains tracks or it doesn't my frank opinion is it would be like the sands of the Sahara that because there's no moisture on the moon you couldn't retain a boop print and therefore that is the refuting instance rather than the absence of tracks related to the rovers but one way or the other they're impaled because if it can retain images or impressions and the rovers without tracks are devastating if it can't then the photographs of the moon prints are devastating we have photographs of the lander of course where you can see beneath the landing pads there's no blown out dust there's no dust on the landing pads there there's no you know evacuation necessary even when it takes off it doesn't create the effects we'd expect because it appears to have been been lifted up by camels and of course we have a whole lot of issues related to the flag blowing and for those who insist that it was merely their hand turning we have lots of footage that shows that's not true that there actually was a wind being blown which of course would be impossible on moon because there is no atmosphere just to mention one more Scott before returning to your fabulous stuff a colleague with whom I did a great deal of research on JFK by the name of Jack White became interested in the the moon landing and he he created a whole site a lots of photographic studies showing converging shadows and so forth and blind multiple sources of light went on the moon there would have only been one namely the sun at great distance so all the lines would have been parallel but he noticed that NASA claimed a rather staggering number of photographs have been taken altogether 5,771 divided by the number of minutes available to take them which was 4,834 so that if nothing but photography had been done you know no other wandering around traveling around moon landing walking nothing else but photography you would have been taking 1.19 photos every minute that men were on the moon a picture every 50 seconds it seems to me quantitatively that's just a devastating argument all by itself even without getting into quality the questions about you know even the converging shadows which is devastating to reflections of astronauts and the visors of astronauts is some you have Buzz Aldrin who's in a got short legs and a big helmet other he has short arms and long legs I mean it gets ridiculous when you get deeply enough into it what I love about your work Scott is it's just devastating to discover that was actually filmed in a in a landfill or a trash dump I mean that doesn't require even the most elementary mathematical consideration that doesn't require any consideration of the atmosphere or lack of atmosphere imprints or lack of imprints to me I think your your presentation may be the most devastating because it's so easy to comprehend of them all not to mention the amount of water that's apparent in the photographs yeah that's great you notice that there are lots of things that are wet in the photographs there are wet and of course that would be preposterous on the moon which has not only no atmosphere but no moisture so you you make another excellent point Scott but please continue with those lines of argument well I was going to say something about Jack White I studied his photographs Marcos Allen wanted me to have a look at them a number of years ago and I wanted to really finish my own work first before I went in and studied his work yeah and and when I was when I was looking at what he was doing in the in the years he was doing it in had he got into the next generation of computers right yeah and tenured working yes he would have been where he would have found everything I did that's wonderful that's wonderful there he was right there with that that's he's looking at some of his photographs he was he had the pieces all there had he had the next generation of computer he was probably still working with the CRT monitor yeah right yeah and with an 800 display and when he as soon as he got into to the next generation where he could really zoom in and look at it he just it just would have come together for him I knew I when I was looking at his stuff I knew he was right there I would put it right together just like I did yeah no idea how much I appreciate those observations he was just a splendid human being and very dedicated to the truth and you know just a mountain of integrity and he did so much good work I really appreciate those observations which he he would have been grateful to hear himself I know oh we might turn to some of the comments you know I was astonished how many views you've had already for example of the one on Paul on the plane mirrored you got a vertical freedom just around the bat so appropriate film the Apollo rubbish at a rubbish dump massive will never admit to the fakery some of these have a very large number of comments too many people still believe whatever they say agreed 80% of the world's population is either unwilling to learn the truth unable to learn or willfully stupid the moon defenders do not care and ignore any evidence supplied it was fake makes me believe summer on NASA's payroll I wonder how many years of college many made many of these people so stupid Anthony fifth you think to 8% of the earth's population things we never went to the moon it flat Eric first because many of these are referring to their handles you know and this is a response flat Eric says I'm going to bet there will never be a judgment day you've been indoctrinated oh that's because of a religious view tell me what you thought were some of the most intriguing or interesting or valuable or insightful of the comments I mean there are over 600 comments well the the people that acknowledge that I've taken the time to do the work there's a lot of people that just say you know they they they don't believe that I've actually done the work that I've done that I've studied it they just think that I look at it like they do right you know like the the people that say that it's enlightening that it's confirming to them right they've looked at other stuff but this really makes it solid the evidence is solid for them right and they're looking at it that that makes it you know worthwhile doing the the other people that are in here that are just want to get their little band the son or whatever and make a comment right yeah I told I'll just to leave them out there because when this is all said and done this is locked in history right so that's right exposing one of the greatest hoaxes of all time I mean there can be no doubt about it I mean the idea that Lee Oswald was a lone shooter of JFK is one of enormous significance to the country the idea that 19 Islamic terrorists attacked us on 9-11 is another but the moon landing hoaxes right out there those might be the three greatest in in the 20th century ever perpetrated on on the citizens of the world so I think you've made a major contribution here Scott well if you realize how intense the vacuum of space is and how close tolerances are to create a seal on on the equipment so if you open a door that seal has to stay perfectly clean to close that door and pressurize a machine right and then you realize these guys are crawling they're crawling through the thresholds in and out and you can see physically that their suits are covered in dirt okay the seal on the door is going to be fully compromised very good okay when they take that suit off with any amount of dirt even not even as little as a hair the suit wouldn't be able to hold the pressure in the suit anymore and they take these off and they're going in and out they go out on three EVAs right you think they can take that suit off and and there's no dirt in those seals there's no way they're going to put them back together even if they could do it the first time there's no way they're going to do it the second time there's no way they're going to be able to close the door and and pressurize that thing it just wouldn't do it yeah that's a wonderful wonderful telling point just just on that and if you and if you see what it takes at that level of vacuum they they can't even use neoprene or rubber seals they have to be steel okay they're using they're using silver on copper silver blade driven into copper and compress them down that way to be able to seal that off at that level of vacuum okay and when you do it in metal it's a one-time only you have to replace the seal every time you use it so they weren't doing that right they didn't have they didn't have anything to protect them to seal that door again the only thing they had in their kit was three jack screws to pull the door in three little jack screws in the kit that's the only thing that they could do it's a joke it's such a joke Scott once you get into it yeah and you just just on that little point alone on the just just on the vacuum of space okay and when and when you get into radiation on the thing and they're saying all the craft is protected is you know had enough radiation protection right then you look at what they did with a Ryan when they they give 15 minutes up there right like the whole trip was four and a half hours but they're actually only 15 minutes up in their flight path the entire craft 100% of it was completely covered with thermal shielding and radiation shielding included the windows and as soon as you realize that that there's windows in the craft both in the CSM and the lamp right there's no radiation protection yes yes yes that the whole thing it's looter plants when you realize what actually would have been required and they had nothing like it they had a colored tin foil that they were using around a very shoddy piece of equipment that looked like it had been put together from Home Depot you know go out and get some parts get some pipes get some flat things that can look like landing pads put this thing together it's absolutely shabby I get a class an interaction with students from an excellent school in Texas and they had gone to the space museum and they gave a presentation it was about an hour long but just devastated the very idea we'd gone there just based upon the flimsy properties of the lander I mean it was just stunning a couple of high school students dissecting the moon landing hoax just by visiting the space museum right well that's where that's where all this stuff is that they were using they just whatever they built just went into the museum that's all they built it for if you also realize about radiation and if anybody tries to defend the fact that you know the the their equipment or spacesuit and everything else protected them from radiation okay they spent three days on the way back Apollo 17 had a hundred kilos of moon rocks inside there with them and if you look at the photographs they're covered in moon dust okay highly radioactive moon dust directly intimately on their skin but no adverse effects not even a blister not even a pimple Scott from this exposure stunning amazing if you vitality of astronaut skimp astronaut human skin is superhuman unbelievable that's right you breathe it in if you look at even at Chernobyl now the just the wind running around you can't you can't breathe it in even today you can't breathe it in even today without suffering that's right if you're breathing the dust in it it stays in your system you're right literal poison yourself your lifespan has been dramatically reduced okay and they're they're they're breathing in 3.8 billion year old dust that has been directly exposed to the sun without any protection that stuff has got to be highly radioactive I've got a bet there a lot of members of our audience who'd love to speak to you about this so I want to mention we're going to open the lines for the second hour the number the call in number is 540 352 4452 so the 52 repeats 540 352 4452 call in to speak to Scott Henderson or to me if you got any questions about Kavanaugh you know direct those to me but I'm willing to take questions about you know the catastrophe that's about to befall the Democrats in the midterm election they thought there was going to be a blue wave I'm afraid there's been a transformation in the the color it's looks to me like it's going to be red and that the Democrats aren't going to be happy about it but they brought this all down upon themselves by this completely contrived attempt to sabotage a highly qualified candidate to the Supreme Court using the background of the me two movement as a context and frankly they've not only damaged your own political prospects it may be very difficult for the party to recover any credibility after this completely outrageous performance but they've done a measurable harm to the me two movement because it was predicated on taking a woman's testimony about sexual assault seriously this case demonstrates in a spectacular way that each case has to be evaluated in on its own merits and there's no justification for generalizing and assuming because a complaint or objection is being raised by a woman it therefore has to be true obviously fallacious demonstrated in this instance in a spectacular fashion I'm so pleased to have Scott Henderson here I repeat the number for calling in 5403524452 so Listen, from目b� In breaking news, a visiting Syrian diplomat reported today that their population is evolving rapidly and advancing into a fifth-dimensional consciousness. They are seeking peace with all cosmic cultures, which may mean that the Earth will be asked to join the prestigious Galactic Federation of Lightal Sciences. Please join Debbie West and Michael Hathaway on Lost Knowledge. Saturdays, 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time in Studio A. For the latest breaking news on the star visitors' peaceful contact and the ongoing project of Clindsey, the Earth. Who are you? I am the architect. I created the Matrix. I've been waiting for you. Why am I here? You are the eventuality of an anomaly which despite messing with the death of Zion, I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision. You just lead you in a surrogate day. Here, you have an answer to my question. The Matrix is older than you know. As you are undoubtedly gathering, the anomaly is systemic. Creating fluctuations in even the most simplistic equation. Choice. The problem is choice. Right here at Rebelist Radio FreedomsFlutz.com, be here Wednesday evening at 8 p.m. Eastern Time for Private Eye Matrix revealed with Monique Wilson. Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy. But did you know that it was an inside job that Osama had nothing to do with it? That the twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro-news. At Building 7 collapsed, 7 hours later because of explosives planted in the building. Very Jennings was there. He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people. For US Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there at this not been a nuclear event. Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position. 9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the Neocons of the Department of Defense and the Mossad. Don't let yourself be played. Read American Nuke on 9-11 available at moonrockbooks.com. That's moonrockbooks.com. This is Thomas, aka Mad Painter. I'd like you to join me Monday nights 10 p.m. Eastern Standard Time for Open Canvas. Don't forget to bring an open mind. Yes folks, that's right. Bring an open mind to an open canvas. Again, that is Monday nights 10 p.m. Eastern UFOs to government corruption. This is Revolution Radio, Freedom Slips.com. You don't need to expect us. We're already here. Thanks for tuning in to Revolution Radio. Here at Revolution Radio, we are list-responsored in commercial free. But there still are bills to pay. In order to raise some needed funds to come under the cost, our station is operating still for special. In the continental United States for a $60 donation for in Alaska, Hawaii, or Canada for a $70 donation, we will send you an uncirculated 2018 One-House Pure Silver Eagle. The $70 donation extra-tannis to cover shipping by the way outside of the continental United States. When making the donation, you must put silver eagle promo in the notes on the donation. And thank you for tuning in to Revolution Radio. At Revolution.Radio and Freedom Slips.com. Without you, there is no less. Revolution Radio, where information never sleeps. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Absolutely confusing in the Netherlands Yes. The� Oscars of the City of East Japan, 1981, and the accessory features on miles are added to the breakdown of the devastated North St dachteigator The Co 2500 ね In Joe and Joe Lorenzo Re bottles Dale Bo 파 Tre месте Slinco Poor Про The 40 auto Low Community Troops at the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates. You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% list their supported radio, and now we return you to your host. This is that Jim Fetzer, your host on the raw deal, and let me encourage everyone to contemplate, you know, modes of supporting Revolution Radio, one of the best in my opinion, is simply by subscribing to the archives for five bucks a month. Over 12 years, that's 60 bucks. That's a nice donation to the efforts being made here by the hosts and the programmers and the owners of the station and so forth to keep us on the air. So think about it. It gives you access to all the shows, past, present, all the archives, whether Studio A, Studio B, a really good way to go. I reiterate the phone number for anyone who would like to call in, 540352, 4452, 540352, 4452, I just like to mention that in the second edition of the, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either, which Mike Palachek, the series editor, and suggested as an appropriate second title following the first, nobody died at Sandy Hooks. And someone might well respond. And I suppose we didn't go to the moon either. As though it was such a bewildering claim. Absent the evidence, of course. If you don't look at the evidence, you're almost inevitably going to commit blunders by believing what you hear, repeated endlessly on the mocking bird media. But in the preface to the second edition of the moon book, which as I observe has just appeared, we offer three examples. This is just in the preface mind, you, which is like in 2012, a spokesman for NASA actually blew the cover by observing that the greatest obstacle to a man mission to Mars was the Van L and radiation belt. Well, if the Van L and radiation belt posed a hazard in 2012, it obviously posed a hazard in 1969-70 when these landings were taking place. And implies that in fact they didn't take place at all. Second was the discovery of more than 300 data reels, some from Apollo, where emissions were discovered in a deceased Pennsylvania man's basement, a FOIA document revealed, which NASA instead of treasuring them was among the most precious footage ever taken. When about destroying them, no doubt because the more sophisticated computer techniques to which Scott was alluding would have enabled their study to reveal indications of fakery, no doubt some of which of the very kind he's addressing with us today. And third, and this is actually my favorite, the Space Poop Problem. Help NASA solve its space poop problem and win $30,000. This explains that NASA can only handle 14 hours of human waste at present when the missions to the moon average three days each away, plus time spent on the surface about its conclusive roof that we did not go to the moon as one could imagine. It was an elaborate ruse. The whole idea of having gone to the moon is nothing but an elaborate pile of space poop. Scott, I just say I reiterate how much I like what you've done here because it brings home the message to those who, you know, even if they're uninterested in doing research on the moon landing, it makes it impossible to deny that this whole thing was nothing but an elaborate ruse. Well, yes, when you're talking about their refuse and stuff like that, just imagine the fact they didn't have an airlock and you're going to depressurize that vehicle. Imagine what happens to that space poop when the bag explodes. Okay, and the urine. Talk about hitting the fan. Yes, and not to mention their little poaches of tang and stuff like that, that you see them drinking and stuff like that. Those things were not rated, none of those packages were rated for a vacuum. Okay, and then I'll be exposed to it because there is no airlock. Yes, yes, yes. Okay, yes. Here they are displaying them having a drink on the way back. Well, they just simply wouldn't be there. It's all ridiculous beyond belief once you put the two and two together, Scott. That's right. When you start to look at it and you go, well, that can't be. This can't be. That can't happen. Right? You can't sit inside a spaceship with radioactive moon rocks and you're sitting in a freezer. Here's a DJ going back to some of the comments. Here's one from DJ Ricky Dink. NASA will never admit to the fakery because they don't have to. It's only fakery in people's heads with paranoid conspiracy minds with a religious babbling belief. When are you clowns just going to live your lives? Another comment, you're right, my friend. Okay, when I was a kid and growing up and doing kid stuff, telling lies was part of it, nothing lie. My mom always knew when I was lying and she'd often say, boy, you need a good memory to be a good pimmer. Then she'd add, and if you have a good memory and tell the same, you got to tell the same lie over and over. My wife has made that observation before. That when you're telling the truth, it's easy because you don't have to remember what you said before about it. This is where I think people like Dr. Christine Blaisey Ford gets into big trouble, can't keep her story straight. We got so many different variations because it's all a fabrication. The stuff we found about the moon landing is just preposterous. And I'm pleased to say that my producer, Mitchell Bup, has a few words he'd like to add to in comment with you, Scott Mitchell. Please do join the conversation. Hey, what does Scott talk to you? Great. I spent 18 months working in a nuclear power plant. Once you get outside our atmosphere to protect us from the ultraviolet radiation of space, our bodies will pretty much wilt away to almost death. A sheet of paper, and it doesn't take much to stop like alpha and beta gamma radiation. But if you're talking alpha and beta, however, if you're talking about gamma radiation, and from solar mass ejections and solar flares, there's no way that our body can withstand that amount of radiation. Well, that's great. You work in a nuclear power facility, didn't you? Yeah, for 18 months. Okay. The Bruce Nuclear Power Plant here in Ontario on the short late here on has a proposal for a deep repository. It's 3,000 feet deep down into the ancient bedrock. And they wish to develop this site to store radioactive waste. Okay. Yeah. Okay, but now listen though, they want to put it like they're going to use containers to start like containers and seal it and then encase it in reinforced concrete so that it can't ever leak. Right? But what they're going to put down there is low level radiation. So people that are working, they put their protective suits on, they go into an area, right? Whatever, absorb radiation on there, the tools they're working with and that. That's what's going to go down there, not the nuclear fuel rods. Correct. Correct. Okay. So they go ahead for four hours and work and take that out and there's objection to them storing that 3,000 feet in the ground to store it in a thing. But NASA can put it on the site after 10 days is fixed. Yeah. Oh yeah. There's no doubt. And one of the other things too is the internal contamination. You know, when they brought the moon rocks and all that other stuff into the castle and they, you know, they pretty much got out of their, their respirators, their spacesuits and we're was breathing that air. That fine dust or whatever was in there, it wouldn't matter if it was alpha and beta radiation contaminated particles. It would be directly worked in directly in the lungs and that doesn't protect from that. But it's quite interesting. And NASA can put their stuff on the display. Yeah. They got one mine, they got a half of a moon of mine somewhere in a low level radiation waste on somewhere. But yeah. And you know, when they do this, you know, they put these things, they're in 55 gallon drums and only do they keep compressing in the drum and then they actually compress the drum and they put these things on basically in man out boxes and hollow them out. You know, we used to laugh, you know, because most of it is rubber gloves and kind of plastic boonies and and mastique tape. Right, right. Well, they were claiming that they're going to incinerate the clothing before they put it down there. Yeah. Okay. Can you capture all that action? That's a question. I would imagine, I imagine they're going to use some kind of hephophilteria, the high-fifish and heavy-fifish. Yeah. But yeah, I was laughing about that. And here's one of the other things about the moon landings and the video and all this other stuff that Jim talked about it and you talked about it, the dust problem. Okay. Because of the, let's see, one sixth the gravity, no weather to to compact what the dust is that's on the surface. And when you have no moisture, that stuff is the only thing I could compare to would be asbestos when it's super powdery and it's called friable asbestos, they remove it because a drop of water can fall on it and it will make up a puff. Yes. There's no way that there's no way that whether it's the rover or the astronauts walking or even breaking those rocks open, that would create a big, such a bigger dust storm in space than what we would see here on Earth because of the gravity and the lack of moisture. I mean, it would be impossible for them to walk across the moon and not leave big puffs of dust around their feet. It would be impossible. One of the biggest failures in their simulation was not being able to depict exactly that. And if you consider the fact that the moon is sitting absolutely still, there's no atmosphere, there's no wind, there's no wind, there's no nothing, nothing to compress the soil. And just like here on Earth, it is collecting cosmic dust. So when you look at photographs of it, every surface should have the cosmic dust building up on it. And we're not talking about a few thousand years, we've got 3.8 billion years of this happening and the only other dust that's going to be happening is from meteor impacts, right? That's going to throw dust, and that's going to settle down. There shouldn't be anything that you can see. And just for an example, if it took 10,000 years or so that if you wipe the surface, you can see your fingerprint in it. If it took a million years to build a layer of dirt, dust, as thick as a piece of paper. It's still over 6 feet high, 3.8 billion years. Even if it was only a few inches thick, it would just be like a fresh flow of snow over everything. It's a complete failure in the simulation to be able to do that. And then the top of that is going to be not just one of the 6 gravity, but there's nothing on top of it pushing it down. We have an atmosphere. We don't think the atmosphere is very much. Okay. But it is 10 times per square meter. Wow. It is a compression of the atmosphere. See that? Hmm. Dang. Okay. That's a gap. That's a gap. That does happen on the moon. There's absolutely nothing there at all. Right? So that very, very fine dust would have been kicked out. It would take a lot, not a lot of time to settle. Yeah. That might have been. But it would be absolutely fine. Even, they should have depicted it as being at least knee. Mm-hmm. Yes. Okay. Something. The rocks are fair. You look at every photograph. The rocks are just thinking of it very absolutely in no way. Yeah. I have a question too. You know, because once you get into the space, you know, the space is very, very, very interesting. This is a, it's an, I would call it like an electromagnetic void as a vacuum. How? I don't explain it. You know, when we, the cameras, the cameras that were used, they couldn't have been a standard television cameras or they had to have altered lenses and stuff to actually pick up the reflection of the person in the ultraviolet environment or the, or the great, the electromagnetic environment. Yeah. I guess that's one of the biggest things that, that I have questions that I have, you know, about space itself is that, you know, when we look up into the star, sky, we see all the stars. Well, a lot of times when you're, when they see photos of maybe sometimes at a space station or other photos, there's nothing. It's just black in space. And then other times there are, you can actually see some of the stars. And I'm trying to determine exactly why that is. Whether it's the equipment or that they're using that allows you to see the electromagnetic spectrum and visible lights as a reflection. Well, I don't know because it's ever out there, so we don't know. Okay. Yeah. I mean, I don't know. I mean, I just want to take that. I've discussed this with Parker Zown because his, his, the man if you want to talk to about the cameras, right? Right. Um, those, those colored plates at the thing to calibrate the color of the film before they shoot it. Yes. It would have to be done on location for those colors to be correct because. And white balance camera. That's correct. Yes. Uh, our earth is, uh, filtering out the light. We don't get 100% of it in the spectrum, especially the UV light, which dramatically altered his colors. Yeah. Okay. It's a good point. It's like a black light, right? UV light. Yes. Yeah, that's absolutely. And it's kind of dramatically altered the colors on it. So you couldn't do a color chart here. And then send it out there. It has to be not a good issue. Correct. Right. On the thing, Apollo 16 had a, uh, very expensive, um, camera for filming the stars and everything. And also I had looked for the photographs on that. And apparently it was done on a special film or whatever. And the machine that, uh, whether it's developing this or whatever it is, they destroyed that as well. So they don't have the film up. And it's, uh, the camera is completely gold. They spend millions of dollars on the thing. And you see maybe a couple of shots of it in the city beside the, uh, the land around Apollo 16. And that's it. Okay. And it's supposed to date. Uh, time lapse. Um, photographs on it. So they could, uh, map the stars on the plants or anything else. Right. And it's just nothing problem. There's nothing problem. It's very camera. Oh, it's a little long. Scott, you've mentioned a couple of times the formation of Moon about 3.8 million, a billion years ago. Now, Earth and the solar system generally are supposed to have occurred about four and a half. So I've assumed, you know, that the moon was formed at that point. Roughly at the same time, but it may have been, uh, a subsidiary event caused by some sort of impact forming the moon. As best I can find it, it's estimated to have occurred about 95 million years after the formation of the solar system and Earth give or take 32 million years. That would still make it closer to 4.5 billion than 3.8. I just wondered if you could comment on the difference in numbers there. Well, the difference in numbers is that it's what NASA's claiming is what they collected coming back, which would be on the surface, not as the thing was being formed. Just the final rocks on the surface, uh, at 3.8 billion years. I see. So that would be the age of the moon rocks. That's the age of the moon rocks that they're claiming that they had. And you know, of course, it, uh, weren't even on broad lead in expedition to the Antarctic. Prior to any of these moon missions in order to gather, monified moon rocks that had been dislodged from the surface of the moon by impact of small asteroids caught in Earth's gravitational field and brought down to Earth in that region so they could reduce them as monified moon rocks. Only they have not arrived on Earth by the mode of transportation they would claim. Well, that's right. I don't know. I don't know how they determine those rocks. Uh, like certainly they're, they're going down there and they gather meteorites. I don't know how they can claim that one came from the moon and one came from here and one came from the air or just off of passing meteor, right? Good stuff. Good stuff. So you have to go out and have the actual sample and compare it. Yeah. Right. Right. There's no comparison to what they gather. Certainly they can determine that they, that they came in as a, as a meteor and struck the Earth. They can certainly identify that. But they can't tell me that it came from the moon and something hit the moon and this is a piece that came off the moon. Because they've been very embarrassed by distributing these on a very selective basis and it turned out that one in a, in a, in a museum in hall and turned out to be a piece of petrified wood. How bad is that? Well, I'll tell you, if you're running around in a part of a climate where there's petrified wood material, you probably could affect one out by accident, not even knowing. Yes. Yes. I mean, there's what are unusual colored rocks and things like that to, to put on this flag. Now you believe that the, that the, the landfill or the way stuff and so far the was in the north, western Arizona, if I understand right? Well, the, Cinder Lake is just north of Flagstaff and the landfill site, which is still an operation today is on the southeast corner of Cinder Lake. Southeast corner of Cinder Lake. Yes. You can see there and it's highly protected by the military. Okay. It's a complete government installation with NASA in there and the Air Force. And of course, it's not at all obvious why it ought to be a super secret location. If you don't understand the history of the Moon landing project and the deception, you've always been forced it off on the American people and the citizens of the world. Well, they had the film in somewhere. All of the equipment was at that location. That's where they had the simulators, both indoor and outdoor, where they were actually had the large train to simulate the landing when they were practicing and things like that. They, they have all the indoor simulators as well, located on that site. I believe they've got most of them up and functional for the 50th anniversary. So you can see it happen again. Excellent. Scott will be back after this break with my special guest, Scott Henderson comments by Mitchell Bump and others if you call in 540352-4452. We'll be right back. For the sender, I'm loose and ready at freedom slips.com will be right back. This is the best. Where are they conspiracies? Have you ever wondered if we really did go to the moon? In Paul McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced by an even better musician. Did you know that Saddam Hussein died in a B1 bomber strike on 70th April 2003 and was replaced by one of his doubles who was put on trial and hanged in his place? Or that Osama bin Laden died in Afghanistan on the 15th of December 2001 and was buried in an unmarked grave in accordance with Muslim traditions. At the raid in Pakistan was faked. There's more, including four chapters about the end of World War II which proved that events we've been taught were very different than we have been told. Don't let yourself be played. Read and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either. Available at moonrotbooks.com. That's moonrotbooks.com. Looking for a nightcap to fill your listening needs? Come join us on Space Delph Radio with me Dave Scott right here on Revolution Radio. Monday through Friday for three hours a night starting at 9pm Pacific midnight Easter we will take you down the supernatural path. From ET contact to the paranormal and all of the spiritual cryptid and conspiracy stories in between. You can find us right here on Revolution Radio at spacedelradio.com on Twitter at spacedelradio and on Facebook at spacedelradio show. Spacedel radio. It's a night of talk and interaction. Are you experienced? Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy. But did you know that it was an inside job that Osama had nothing to do with it? That the twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro-news. That building seven collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building. Very Jennings was there. He heard them go up and felt himself stepping over dead people. The US Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there at this not been a nuclear event. Ironically that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position. 9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the Neocons of the Department of Defense and the Mossad. Don't let yourself be played. Read American Nuke on 9-11 available at moonrockbooks.com. That's moonrockbooks.com. The opinions expressed on this radio station. It's programs and its website by the hosts, guests and column listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed that. They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlims.com. It's staff or affiliates. You're listening to Revolution Radio FreedomSlims.com. 100% list their supported radio and now we return you to the US. This is that tip of that. I'm going to host the matter. I'll deal with my very special guest at a Scott Henderson who did this wonderful video on how they filmed the moon landing in a trash dump. Some of the other comments are worth reviewing here. Scott and I'm sure you'll have others. I mentioned the handles. PlaneTruth, PLA and ETruth 101. Oh boy, you guys know that all the NASA fanboys will say that yeah, it was fake because they met aliens up there. So the whole thing was top secret. Buddy Charlottons, no wonder the astronauts were so depressed. Here's a comment reply by Christopher Mason or they will say they faked it to pool Russia. It's crazy that even the ones who realize it was fake will continue to make excuses for NASA rather than question what the hell is going on. But also then we'll think it was real. I just clicked on one of their moon landing videos that was recommended in the comment. A screen section had thousands of people talking about how stupid people are who don't believe the moon landings were real. Then you got Richard Noggin talking to Christopher Mason. People should take the next step and figure it out exactly who's responsible for all the trickery and massive theft. The bastards have names and addresses. Then we have an indecis