JIM FETZER "The Real Deal" (9-12-18): Moon Landings Filmed in Landfill with Scott Henderson

Video Transcript:

This is Jim Fetzer, your host on the real deal where I'm very pleased to have as my special guest. Scott Henderson, who has been doing research on the Apollo moon landings. This has been a subject of great interest to me for many, many years. I've done a number of interviews with Dennis Camino about it, for example. And of course, we've just published the second edition of, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either, which has a new essay by Dennis, in fact, as well as other supplementing the contents of that book. Scott, tell us a little about your background and how you became interested in the moon landing issue. Well, good morning, sir. Thank you for having me on the show. Park Salon, Senses Best, to you. And a little history about myself. I'm a chef by trade. I've always been interested in the moon landings. And in 1969, I was just starting high school. So the science teachers were, of course, very interested in it. There was a very hot topic. And all through high school, every science class we had, I mean, the moon landings and everything came up about it. We even had a model of the Saturn 5 rocket in the corner of the science room. But of course, it was all predicated on the assumption we'd actually gone to the moon. Well, of course, and in those days, of course, why would you question anything? And so for many years, I believed like everyone else that we went to the moon. And when I first started hearing about the conspiracy, I thought I'd better have a look. Because I've always been interested in it. I always followed NASA. And when I first started, I mean, the first thing I was doing, I was looking for the evidence that we went. I wasn't looking the other way. But what I researched was is that the people that we're speaking and saying we didn't go had some real facts. And that just made me dive deeper into it. I spent probably three or four years still looking for the evidence that showed that we went. And the harder I got into the subject and the more I researched it, the more I realized that it didn't happen. It's quite disillusioning, isn't it, to discover some some huge story, whether it happens to be JFK or 9-11 or the moon landing, was a pack of lies, a wopper perpetrated by the government on a gullible public. It's a shocking and disillusioning experience, Scott. Oh, I realize that the one thing that the fanboys of NASA claim is that it was easier to go than it was to fake it. Well, as a matter of fact, they couldn't fake it either. They still filmed it. Yeah, that was attributed to Stanley Kubrick by most, including Jay Weedner, for example, who showed it was done using what's known as front screen projection where the background is everybody does much in focus as the foreground, which of course would be an optical impossibility. We're bonafide all authentic and on the up and up. Well, yes, I've looked at his work, I've studied his work and I've studied the involvement that Kubrick might have had, but you do realize that NASA has the largest studios in the world. Isn't that appropriate? Let me turn to your slides at here. Apollo photographic studies. I'm just so very pleased to have you here. Here's our first. Yeah, we'll start into it. The first set that we're going through are with the rover itself. This is the Apollo 17 rover. There are three of them. And it's very apparent in the picture that one on the left in the screen is actually used in 15, 16 and 17 on it. The one at the top right is just used for demonstration photo shoot. And the one at the bottom right is the, that's the photograph of the actual final resting place of the rover. And if you look carefully across the frame rail on that one at the bottom right, you'll see on the right hand side, the links are quite a bit shorter on the right hand side by the tire there coming up. And then if you look at the one on the left, you'll see that they're quite a bit longer. The frame rail is completely different on the two machines. That's fascinating. And of course, I noticed on the top right we have what looks like tracks for the rover, but on the left hand side there are no tracks, which of course is very, very puzzling and less perhaps a rover was set down using a crane. Well, if you realize that they might have driven it in, if you realize that they were probably shooting at multiple times. Okay, and the set crews and that would be out there, they'd have to break off all of their footprints. So that only the astronauts footprints are in the shot. So in fact, when they were re-grooming the set, they inadvertently had the raked over all of the tracks as well. That's my theory on how that happens. But of course you'd agree there's something funny there because we should have tracks. If indeed Moon Dust retains any tracks, we see an obmer of footprints there, which suggests it does. My belief is that since the Moon is bereft of atmosphere that you could no more leave tracks in Moon Dust than you could in the sands of the Sahara. That's right. Well, of course this was not shot on the Moon, so the tracks are there. Right? And they're very defined. If you go to the next slide on there, that on the left is Apollo 16. That is the first photograph where the fender fell off of. And the one on the right is Apollo 17. I mean, they were literally using the same equipment for all of the six missions that they photographed that you'll see it. That more apparently as we run through them, that it's the same equipment being used and you can see it age over time. So the astronauts in Apollo 17 took one of the maps off and put it on the fender. And that's how I got there. But it actually fell off in Apollo 16. It's the same rover. That particular one. Now, this is also Apollo 16 in this one. And if you look just above the fender there, you can see that the steering arm has fallen down. Okay. And the steering was damaged in Apollo 15. And apparently was magically repaired by parking it in the shade overnight. And that's that's done by a well respected presenter that put that I don't want to say who it is. But what happened is is the the front steering broke. So the front tires would display out. So the only way to keep it running and going is that you were driving it backwards. And on the right hand photograph there, you're looking at the tire tracks. And the actual video that they've actually reversed the video. So it looks like it's driving forward. But it's exactly following the tracks. Now the Chevron pattern on the tires show you which way it's running. They're driving that backwards and they're stopping and taking pictures and driving it backwards. And there's about 70 or more photographs of that on it. And if you look at the photographs backwards and it matches the video because the video has been run and reverse. Right. If they were actually driving over their own tire tracks, the Chevron pattern would be the other way. Here is the same rover in 15, 16 and 17. Those are the photographs on it. And the close-ups of the tire show that the left rear wheel axle has a leak in it. And it's coming out and as the tire rotates, the oil is getting all over the rim. So the dirt is now sticking to it. Right. And you can see it in 50 on the top left and 60 in the middle. That's apparently the C-rock there, that one. In there. And the bottom of the are the blow-offs. And by the time you get to a pull of 17, which is the one on the right at the bottom, the oil is really leaking rapidly out of it. And it's going up the frame rail. It's going across the side frame on it. And other associated pictures with it is actually getting all over their suits as well. And of course, Scott wouldn't have been all but impossible to repair a rover on the moon. They had absolutely no contingency for any additional equipment when they were traveling. So they had no repair equipment. The amount of tools were cut down that they needed to have. They developed a bolt called a void bolt, which is they just needed one tool and they just push it in and give it a half turn. And it releases the equipment. So all of the equipment were set up and designed with these void bolts on it. So they only needed one tool. It really looks like a shabby piece of equipment. It really, well, the rover, like I said, they're using the same rover for all the missions. This is exactly the same machine for 15, 16 and 17. And I mean, these are hand-built machines. There's no way that they would reproduce the same problem. And of course, it was ostensibly just left on the moon for subsequent flight so that the astronauts would be saddled with the problem of transporting another rover to the moon. Well, if you had a problem with the rover in 1969 or 1970, right? Or 70 or 71, they put it up there, right? And they saw that it was a problem. They certainly worked on the next one to make sure it didn't have a problem before they loaded it on the rocket, wouldn't they? They'd be testing all out equipment out again. And this is the same problem over and over again. It definitely shows that it's the same machine. And this is Apollo 16. This is the jump salute. And that's a failed attempt at reduced gravity of the moon because he's only jumping about 18 inches off the ground. And this rover is the only picture of this particular rover and it's identified by having a double rib on the front left tire on the fender there. It's the only shot of it going. And it's a perfectly clean rover. You see there's no dirt or dust or anything on it. It's just set there for this photo shoot. A double rib. Yes, I see it there. So how could they encounter having two rovers on the moon? Well, they didn't. They were just using multiple equipment while they were filming it. Like I said, they weren't able to properly fake a full simulation of it, but they still filmed it every anyway and did the very best they could. And this is what they were doing when the equipment broke down. They just brought another piece in while they were filming it. And I'm not saying that no one would pay close enough attention to even notice the difference. You have to realize in 1969 that the only photographs available to the public were just what they put out for the media. There might be two or three dozen for each mission that were put out for magazines and newspapers and, you know, national geographic that kind of thing. They put them in the other hundreds of photos or thousands of photos were not available to the public. Right. And when NASA first put up even on their first website. Right. There was only a limited amount there. And in 1999, kept teak working for NASA put the entire journal up of all the photographs. And of course, three years ago, they put them on flicker as well. They've updated them and put them on flicker as well for the public to see. And NASA claims that on flicker in the last three years, they've had over a billion views of the photographs. Well, a billion views are going to lead to a lot of observations of anomalies of the kind you're observing here. And of course, these, which you're reporting are novel to me. But I've seen hundreds of others before, including converging shadows and blind more than one source of light that you have illumination of an astronaut on the dark side of the lander where you ought to be in darkness. The waving flag, of course, in an environment where there's a ledge to be no atmosphere. The classic conspiracy theory that we land on the moon even shows that the astronauts are being elevated by the use of cables. I mean, it's embarrassingly bad Scott that as you observe the deeper you get into it, the worse it becomes, the more elaborate the fraud. That's right. Well, the one thing that I have stayed away from is reproducing anyone else's work. Okay, the information I give and what I put in the photographs are all of my findings. I certainly have looked at all the other findings, right, that people have found in there. I mean, it's, it's, you know, easy, easy for a lot of people to quote and have comments on what other people have discovered or done. And what is unique and what Marcus Allen himself was impressed with as well as David Percy is the amount of detail you can find in there to show how much more there is to it. I mean, there's 10,000 photographs of them, you know, to look through. So there's just endless amount of stuff and because it's shot here on earth. Okay, and the location of what it's being shot. I mean, it's actually shot in a landfill site junkyard like a scrap metal site, basically. And what is underneath that dirt is absolutely amazing and we're going to find some of that very shortly when we go through. I mentioned the staggering number of photographs, Jack White, who was a legendary photo and film analyst from JFK with whom I did a great deal of elaboration became interested in the Apollo photographs. And of course, also has a website there. And he just did a simple calculation of the number of minutes available to take photographs and the number of photographs taken and discovered that if this were all authentic. The astronauts would have been had to have been taken photographs at the rate of one every 50 seconds, which of course is completely absurd. It wouldn't be able to do anything else. There's a few other things here are the here are the 17 robert. This is right in front of the rear right wheel. Okay, that's the frame rail. You can see the arm that's going up there on the left arm. The arrow shoots through is for the seat itself. So you can see that in each of the photographs where it's sitting. The actual frame behind that is completely different in each one of the photographs. And I mean, you it's part of the structure of the rover itself. You can't just change that. Those are the three separate rovers and that clearly identifies that there are three separate machines. I presume the rover was simply a variation on a doom buggy of the kind we find in Southern California ubiquitously. Except they made this one fold up with four electric motors running the tires. And on the bottom are the three different trends that they actually make. Which is completely ridiculous. You're supposed to have one rover with one set of tires not leaving three set of tread tracks. Well, it should always look the same right. The one on the the left that that's very square the top left of the tire tracks. Yeah, you can see it's a perfectly straight line. Well, the Apollo 15 rover was damaged. The damage the steering and everything else. And when they tried to fix it up, it's actually dog tracking. So that the tire kicks a little sideways so that the instead of the chevron, it's only running on one part of the tire. So it looks like a square bar. You mean you you you are suggesting there's a legitimate explanation for this variation in the tracks. That's the one rover. That's the the one that the top left tread. That that rovers damage. This is Apollo 17 though. This rover has been running around in 15, 16 and 17. Okay, that's the same rover that broke down that the steering arm fell off in 16 that we saw in the other picture. It's the same rover. They keep repairing this thing and keep using it over and over again, even though it's damaged. Do we have any records of the astronauts performing these repairs where they photographing their work on the rover? No, of course they didn't photograph the work on the rover. Okay, I mean they were they were sitting in on earth and the entire support crew were coming in there and probably grummed and bowing and everybody else are trying to keep this stuff running. It's just an elaborate gel. It's such a ruse. Now this is Apollo 17 and they just threw the arm away when they were done. That the steering arm right there is on the ground and it finally fell off the rover completely. So they threw it away and then they set a golf ball down beside it. And Apollo 14 is the only one to claim to have a golf ball. If anyone is analyzing this photograph in particular and you zoom in about 10 times in, you will start to see golf balls all over there. They were using this as a driving range when they were having lunch between buildings. Scott, that's stunning! That's just embarrassingly bad. The only thing I haven't found is what brand of pizza box they were using for lunch. It's pretty amazing when you look at some of these photographs. The arrogance, the arrogance of this operation. Just treating the American public as though they were nothing but a vast collection of morons. If you're looking at the ground here, it doesn't match the background. The mountain in the background is quite a bit different color and you'll see the change when they're shooting through this valley on it. And the reason why it's darker is because it had rain. Because it had rain on the moon. No, it had rained on the set on the ground. I mean, that's absurd! You can see that it's rained and if you look at the ground, you can see how it's speckled or rough. It's rained and it's put through there on it. That's what the footprints, when you disturb the soil, should be the same color underneath. It shouldn't be darker. If you're walking through, it's perfectly dry sand and you kick the sand off, it's still the same color underneath. But if it's water and it's darker. That's right, of course. This is exactly what you're looking at in the photograph. It's not our love, this is just fantastic stuff. Now, these are the, this is just one example of the cuck list. The cuff cuck list. These are worn on the wrist or the cuff. And it's a little set of instructions for the astronauts. But what they actually are are instructions on how to film each scene. Yes, this is the script. This is the storyboard. The astronauts, of course, they had their own communications. They couldn't have anybody else giving them instructions over a mic that's being recorded live for them or whatever they're doing. And they were restricted in their vision so they couldn't have people giving them hand signals. So they had to write these things up for them and say, this is what you've got to do. So it actually gives them the timeline because the back cameras either had a four minute real or a 12 minute real. So it gives them the timeline what they're doing. And if you look at the top left, the LMP is the lunar mod your pilot that shows them where he's going to be standing. Okay, it shows where the footprints are. It shows where the disturbed area is. It showed where they the rock where the hole was and where they set the rock. How to do it. And then it shows where it says one, two, three on the thing there that it shows the camera settings and where to stand for the commander to take those photographs and how many photographs to take. Okay. And on the top right, it's a full description of a boulder right down to the exact size. Now this thing's this boulders about. Third half 50% bigger than a football. Okay. Yeah. Now it shows the exact time that the astronauts would arrive. This is station nine. And of course they laid the stations out too. They mapped all those out before they went. These are done months before they even took off so called to go to the moon. So how do they know that there'd be a football size or vice as big as a football shape rock there and know what the mineral contents were once they split open when they got there. Scott, this is devastating devastating stuff. Absolutely. And then when you look at the bottom on the bottom left, you'll see that it says photos taken past tense. Yes. Okay. But they even know the direction of the sun. Where does that the camera is up in the direction of the sun? How do you know which direction this rock is going to be located at when it's only that big? Because of course they're prepping the set. I mean it all is just so incredibly revealing and so damning of the whole project. Well you see they went out and they collected the rocks here on earth. And then they designed the set so they set up the different stations. And that's where they're going to have the different samples of rocks coming from. And these are all laid out in the storyboard on the cuff checklist. Fascinating. Oh, ahead of time. Right. That's how you get the station layout even though the exact time. Right. If you can imagine the exact time you have to start from launch and calculate that. That that's when they're going to show up. I mean if you did one extra orbit around the moon. You wouldn't even land in the same there's five alternate landing sites. For each mission. They left nothing to chance of course and nevertheless they slipped up in innumerable different ways. And this this one here on the. This is the video that they put up on the internet. It's called the Grand Prix. Okay and if you listen to the commentary it's like they're just okay. We'll give it some gas and make a turn here and do this and do that. It's all laid out for them here right in the in the cuff checklist. That they drive through the first crater. Go around the other two craters and drives through the last one. The camera positions are sitting there and of course. The astronaut is taking photographs of this and running both those cameras at the same time. I mean both those cameras have to move to follow the rover. Doesn't this require more camera men than we have astronauts? Well there's only two there. The one on the right. Jones is the inspector for the film. Okay and they've penciled them in here on the thing and there are a couple of people on the internet that claim that Jones is actually a crater. And they reproduce them out showing that Jones was an actual crater. They drew a big circle around it claiming it's a crater and they've modified the commentary right at the Apollo site. So they must be working for either NASA or Phil plate that astronomy because he updates and does stuff on the Apollo journal site. However, the photographs do not. If that was a crater there, a large crater, the one that they drew and put a map up for. First of all, they never traversed through a crater and if you look at the depths of these craters, okay, there's no way you're going to drive the rover through it. At no time that they do that. And that straight line is the traverse line where the rover is driving down there. And if you look at the most of the craters on there, they're all done with British names. There's Camelot and Henry and Shakespeare and stuff like that, right? Not Jones. Okay. But there's nothing to support their claim that there's actual crater there were Joneses, what they've reproduced in the map for. Okay, nothing else supports that. And you believe it was actually a director or an inspector someone who was just go to the next screen overseeing the shooting of the scene. Right, just go to the next screen. There he is right there. That color plate. That inspector Jones, yeah. That color plate that color plate is at the start of. Of the photographs, right? They're at the, sorry, this is at the start of the video. That's running on here. So this is so revealing in and of itself for crying out loud. And and hop. He was a photographer. He was an on board. He never went to the moon. Now look at the date. 28th of November, 1972. Well, they didn't launch until December the 7th. The launch date for Apollo 17 was December the 7th. This was shot on the 28th of November. And it was about 10 days before they even took off. Yes. Now all of these videos are online. The raw on cut videos have this color plate at the start. Of them. And it shows the date, the inspector and the photographer for each of them. Really? So it's that light and it's that obvious. It's that accessible. They're all on YouTube. If you take a take a look at any of the missions. Okay. They're all there and they're all taken beforehand. How can anyone be taken in Scott? I mean, after seeing what you presented already, I can't believe anyone could continue to believe this was real. Any of it is also obviously staged and faked and phony. Right. Well, like I said, they claim they it was impossible for them to fake. And it was. Okay. They couldn't they couldn't manage zero gravity. They messed that up because the only time the astronauts would be in in weightless condition. Would would be when they were in orbit around either the earth or the moon. When they reached that equilibrium that they would be weightless. They would be traveling to and from. They wouldn't necessarily be weightless. They still you're pulling away from the earth. You're going to be affected by the gravity. But they didn't know that. So they showed them being weightless the entire way. Right. The the videos of them in supposedly in one sixth gravity on the moon. I mean, you see them tripping and falling. You know, after they fell down because they couldn't stand up and things like that. And of course, if you look on their suits, they have clips. Right after waste. There's two big hooks right there for the wires to hook on to right on their suits. It's pretty amazing. Okay. On the left is Apollo 11. And the helium tank there is in quadrant one. And what isn't shown is the extra batteries for the. Their backpacks, the plus. Are down on the left hand side on that. And that helium tank. Pressurizes the four fuel tanks. To push it through the engine. Okay. On the image on the right. Okay. You can see where the ladder is. You're still quadrant one where that big black arrow is. That's a little schematic of the rover. And that's the two tires folded in and it's in there. So the helium tank has been removed. Okay. And if you remove the helium tank, you can't pressurize the fuel to run the engine. The way the paint is even even from the point of view of the engineering design. It's a preposterous arrangement. Well, they had to add the rover to it somehow. So they simply remove the helium tank. Okay. It's not relocated. There is no other spot to relocate it. Okay. The engine sits in the center square. And then the four around it, the four squares around it are where the fuel tank said. Okay. And then what's left over on the side are the, are the base, which are. Are triangulated in right. The fill in the base. So you have your payload bay and your experimental equipment is in two. Right. And quadrant one is where the helium tank was and the extra batteries for their backpacks. That's all been removed just to hold the rover in place. The thing won't run. The engine won't run without that tank. Well, that's what NASA says. I think it would run just fine without that tank, but. The whole thing was just junk. This is just junk Scott. Yeah. Now, this is an interesting shot. The first thing you should take note of is that is the CSM. Okay. And the picture is supposed to be shot from the lunar module. Now, no time. Was a lunar module in a higher orbit. Above the, the CSM and the following photographs of that. It's the CSM is actually descending to the moon, which it didn't do. Only the lemon. Now, the second part of this is, is that is the moon behind it. Nice, brightly lit up. So the silver reflection on that should have nothing but the black. Blackness of space. There's nothing else there. There might be a little image of the lunar module, but that's not where you're looking at. This thing is hung up in a, in a hangar somewhere. And if you look at the close-up, you'll see that there's the two doors are there. There's a colonial style doors. One has the window in it, right? The other one you can see the handle and the latch on it. And then back on the right-hand side, there's three guys standing there. Two are facing to the left, and the other one is facing forward. And if you look at it, you can see their arms, their hair, their faces are all there in those images. You mentioned the blackness of space. My presumption has been that the sky would be ablaze with points of light that were distant stars. That they wouldn't be twinkling because of the lack of atmosphere. But either way, you should be looking up at the CSM, not down toward the moon. But because it is pointing up, even if it's not going to show stars or anything else, it should only be the blackness of space. There should be nothing else reflecting off of that. And that's exactly what you're looking at. I mean, like there'd be a bright spot, bright reflection of the sun, wherever it's sitting, on it. And there might be a little spot because of the angle of that cone. There'd be a little dot of the lunar module would show up in it, and neither of those are there. Well, your most devastating point is the CSM was never in a lower or- below the Alam, and therefore the photograph is impossible. It travels way down the series of photographs of this. It's traveling very low down. It gets down to a little tiny dot that you have to zoom in to even see it. It's at my floor, and there's absolutely no way. And all of the other documents that support the orbits in their pass never show the CSM below the limb. The limb comes up to it and joins with it. This is an interesting photograph. This is, of course, the iconic photograph of Buzz Aldrin. And he's actually pointing at his watch. And because the astronauts themselves are the whistleblowers, they do a lot of pointing stuff out. A lot of pointing stuff out. And if you see the watches, 14 minutes after 11, and David Kernsey wrote up the article on here on the importance of the 11 and 14 for both the Freemasons and NASA. The fact of the matter is he stepped on Buzz Aldrin's official file as he stepped on at 316-15 UTC time. And that would make it a quarter after 11. Florida time, I think. However, this photograph was taken 59 minutes and 20 seconds after he set foot on the moon. So it should save quarter after 12 if he was set on Florida time. Okay. If he was unused in time, it would be quarter after 11, which is also where his own time, right? Expand on this significance for Freemasons and NASA in the role of the astronauts in blowing whistles, even though clearly they have been severely constrained, possibly even threatened with the loss of their lives if they should speak out openly about the fraud. I believe that at the time with the death of. Very. Grissom. Yeah. Chaffee, Grissom and wife. Yeah. I believe that they were very discrepanable employees. Okay. And you can't imagine unless you've ever had a discrepanable employee, you can imagine how they will mess you up. And they will mess you up in ways you can't imagine. And I mean over time, those things past, there's these people who paid a lot of money after the fact. And if you realize that every one of them quit right after their missions, all of the astronauts quit. Why wouldn't you work for NASA? You know, your Neil Armstrong, you're known worldwide. The best advertising they could have, why couldn't they keep them there? Right? Why couldn't they keep any of these people there? Who wants to live a life? Well, most of them became out of homes. But it's all turns a rather well known for that. But when they were shooting the photographs in their very disgruntled state and upset with their employer, they took these photographs to reveal the fraud. They are the whistleblowers. And when you start looking through at what they point out and how they pointed out and how they reveal it. And we're going to get into a few of those of the how they point things out. This one right here, this is interesting because on the right is the live TV camera shooting. And if you see that arm that's sitting out there just at the bottom of the ladder, okay, you can see where the camera should be sitting. And what's coming down that shadow coming down on the ladder is Aldrin's leg. On the left hand photograph. Okay. When you look, there's no camera there. Now, Nasa claims that that camera was on that palette folded down and came out. And where the location of that is in between in that black spot in between the rungs is where the camera is actually sitting mounted. And it is mounted there. But that's the one they drag out and set out on the ground and pull it out 100 feet and shoot from there. These photographs are basically completely incompatible. Well, it shot at different times. The shot that goes to Aldrin appears to be in the shade. Whereas here on the left, he's very clearly illuminated. Well, that's right. It shot at different times, different lighting. Different everything. I mean, in and of itself, this proves the fraud right here. In fact, many of your different presentations, each of them is sufficient. Yes. The whole thing was an elaborate hope. But why isn't why isn't Armstrong in the photograph in the live video? He has to be you can see where he has to be standing to shoot that. It's shooting both the legs back. Right. When you're looking there, you can see him. Both the legs back. He has to be out on that side of that ladder. Roughly where the name Aldrin appears. Yes. He has to be standing there. And that bright spot is where he walks around to. If you're watching the video, he disappears around there long before, like you see him taking some photographs or whatever. And then he walks around behind there. But Buzz hasn't even started down the ladder when he disappears. And the only way that could happen is it's shot at two different times. They're doing multiple takes. Multiple changing lighting. Here's an example of them changing the lighting up. Now, this photograph. Wouldn't have come out till 99 and know a lot of people have researched it. I couldn't believe when I hit it that nobody had found it before me. Because it's very blatant. There's three or four of them in the series on this showing this lighting. So I just took two because it shows the lighting with the shadow one direction, the lighter shadow one direction. And then they've adjusted the lighting. And now it's off to the other side. Just unbelievably insulting. Okay. And nobody can explain this. Like if somebody's going to go around and say, well, there was a guy out there running around in this reflective light is coming off and suit like Miss Boxers. All right. Both these guys are inside the limit the time when they're shot. It's just as blatant as that. This one. Fallen, I did a full video on this. This is the Apollo 16. And the side of the craft literally exposed those panels literally are blown off on their simulated lift off. Okay. And if you look at the top right, you can see that the paint, like they're using the same limb over and over again. And the paint is peeling back on it. And I imagine the astronauts are so frustrated they just decided to blow the panels off the side of it so that they could get the thing fixed up. All right. And the video shows them flying that off the bottom right hand photo there shows the panels literally torn apart. And what is behind those panels are all of the sensitive instruments and controls that run that machine. Okay. And when you see the size of the explosion in the video of the takeoff of the Apollo 16. Okay. This thing would have ruptured the hull and completely wouldn't just disabled the machine. It would just literally explode with the amount that when it ruptured the hull in it. That kind of a vacuum. Okay. So it would have destroyed the ability to launch from the moon. Well, this thing on liftoff, that's all of their controls or relays, telecommunications, everything else are behind that panel directly behind it. And anyone listening to this, just watch the video from Paul on the plane of the Apollo 16 liftoff. Well, we have a six or seven out right now. But when I was a kid, there was a real cheesy TV program called Flash Gordon. And they had very primitive props. This is reminiscent of Flash Gordon Scott. Absolutely. I have been studying how they were doing the simulated landings and takeoffs. And Paul and I will be doing a video on it as well. I believe they were using a steam high pressure steam to simulate the landing. And then when they got to the when they got to the liftoff, all of that equipment was in the in the lander parts. So they didn't have anything to simulate and exhaust on takeoff. And I actually have a shock of the interior control panel inside the lamp. And it shows a full bank of heater switches. And then it shows gauges and it says steam pressure right on it. Steam pressure steam pressure right on it right on the panel. And you got to watch that video because Paul and I are going to put that one up. I love it. I love it Scott. Okay. Now this is the real staging. And it took me a long time because I was kind of stuck on the fact that the wheel was off the ground. And I saw and figured out why they did that. If you look at this tool, they've set it up on this dirt file. Well, first of all, this dirt file looks like it was put there by a front end loader. And there's no other dirt file like this on any of the photographs. Right. They're all kind of smooth over little mounts, but not just a pile of dirt like this. So I'm looking at this this tool. And it just struck me that the shadow of the tool makes an arrow. Well, if it's an arrow, it's pointing to something. So I zoomed in. And if you look at the center, the center amuse, the blow and off amuse there, you can see the black ring and the rubber tip of the glove on the pinky finger. And then if you follow it up to the top, there's three little knobs at the top that they've held it in place with. That's the right-handed glove. And of course, there's enough dirt falling off that you can see how white it is. Right. On the top right, those are gloves sticking out of the dirt. You can see those four fingers, four fingers, four fingers, four fingers. And when you look through that entire pile of dirt on that side, there's probably a whole skid puller gloves. And they probably had a manufacturer that, you know, they'd be putting out contracts for different stuff. They didn't use this particular style glove. But there's other kinds of work gloves in there. And they're stacked up in like half a dozen and a stack and bunch together. And you can see the fingers sticking out all over it just by zooming in and looking on this. This is an anomalous and inadvertent product placement Scott. This showed this one photograph showed that everybody was in on it. The people that were designing the sets, the camera crew and the astronauts. Okay. Oh, filming this. They put this together and set it up. And you can see they would have had to have done that for security. Because if someone were naive and thought this were bonafide, they'd of course have their mind blown. And they'd be a security risk. So they had to recruit with the understanding that what they were doing was simulating a moon landing. And that they were consigned to secrecy. Well, they're trying to expose it as best they could, but they still have to get these photographs passed NASA. Yes. Right. So here it is. Here it is. You look at it. If you don't look at it, you imagine somebody in NASA looking at the photographs. And they went out there and they shot 1,500 photographs. Right. And they just they're looking through them for clarity, color, whether they're in focus, whether they're sunblinded or whatever. Right. They're not looking at the details that's in there because they're assuming that these people are doing their job. All of this stuff is in set in there. Okay. And yes, it took 50 years to get to this point. Many, many thousands of people have looked at these photographs. I mean, like when Marcus Allen, if you realize what he was doing, it's absolutely amazing because the only photographs he had were just a few dozen. I think maybe it doesn't. It's all he had. And they were designed for magazines and any other media events, right. These things were airbrushed over, corrected, color corrected, centered the whole line, Eric's right. And he's looking at the photographs and he's saying, God, the lighting's not right. This isn't right. That isn't right. He's spotting that out. That's incredible compared to what I have. First of all, I have what everybody else, like, that there's something to look for. And I have every photograph of Bill. I've downloaded every photograph I have them all. So look through. And I'm sitting here with a 4K video screen, 30-inch video screen. And I can zoom in 10, 15 times. And it's still clear. It doesn't pick the fix away. Right. I can see the deep thing. Nobody had that 20, 25 years ago, 30 years ago. So what they did, like, even, you know, like Ralph Renee and Bill Kasing and that, they should have settled this back then. I mean, James Collier. He had them dead to rights as well. David Percy, you know, Parks of Brawl. And every piece of evidence that they have come up with, any one of them, NASA should have conceived it. Well, with what I have, they might as well throw all these photographs away because it clearly shows the intent of the astronauts exposing this frog. Now, this is a Apollo 15. When they were simulating, and Paul and I have done a video on this as well, when they were simulating the landing of this, they actually dropped the machine. Okay. It crashed to the ground. It dropped probably 8 or 10 feet when they were lowering it down on the gantry crane. Harden up, that it broke the leg right off on the one side of the secondary stretcher staff that had the thing kicked out. That's the exhaust bell housing has been crushed on it. And it hit hard enough that the rover came right off. Okay. Broke the rover right off its mount on the right of the two schematics of the rover. The top one shows the schematic of the actual lowering arm. So it's went out and down. And on the bottom is with the rover in place, just the schematic of that, that square. And then the wheels go in on the angle in there to fill that spot. So when you look over at the actual photograph, the two big arms are the ones at the bottom that come up on the 45 degree angle up to the rover. They're shared, you can see the shared grade off and the close up photo of it. You can see the lanyards, the spaceship, right? It's a ship so they're lanyards, cables, right? Both those cables are snapped clean off on there. That's how the Apollo 15 rover got damaged. Initially, that's how the steering got damaged. That's how the fenders got damaged. The seats were damaged. And as well, one of the batteries, they even logged that the one battery bank was down. It wasn't functioning at all. And you mentioned here, note the mold on the sewage bag, an example of equipment aging over time. What's got does it mold itself prove this is not on the moon where there's no atmosphere and no moisture. I don't believe it would be possible to have mold on the moon. No, but there's a lot on earth. Flip to the next photo. We just go through and we'll get to there. Now, this is... Those are the backpacks on the ground. If you look at the top right one, you'll see the one house that covers taken off and the other one there is sitting up underneath the machine still together. And of course, the astronaut taking the photograph has to have one on. He can't function out there. And the astronaut in the background's got one on and only two were supplied. So we got two extra backpacks. Well, that backpack isn't really a backpack. That's just a cooling system for the suit. When you're running around doing a simulation on earth, you got to keep these guys cooling those suits. And that's all that is. That's the sublimated core. What's laying outside that thing is sublimated core. Before we go to the next photograph, that leg there is the ball swivel joint is snapped right off when it landed. The leg is sitting off to the side of the pad. It's pushed right off to the side. It should be in the center. It's actually broken right off. Well, the equipment was so flimsy to begin with. I mean, you know, nothing like this could have sustained the actual pressures and stresses. To which it was purportedly subjected on the moon had any of this been real. I think this flimsy thing would have fallen apart immediately. Flip the next one out. There we go. Okay. The on the on the right hand side there on the ground are the ball swivel joints for the secondary struck. Now, they didn't even clean this equipment up. All the broken pieces you can see. All the broken pieces have been stuffed up underneath the machine. Those are the two ball swivel joints that broke off of that leg. Okay. And on the left hand side, if you're looking, the leg on the left, you can see the distance, the length of that leg is a lot shorter than the one on the right. Because they had to make they had to bring in another strut long enough to prop it back up because it was now sitting in that crater. The one on the right being longer than the one on the left. Well, the legs actually do compress. The bottom 32 inches compresses down. But if the one on the left had compressed, the foil would have rolled up. Okay. Yeah. Press the tall. So the other one they replaced it in. The one on the left is 32 inches up to where the secondary strut comes in. And the other one is round four feet. For 48 inches, a foot longer. When the astronauts, you see photographs of the astronauts walk out. That's almost at the shoulder height and the other ones at their waist. And of course, if it doesn't been bona fide, they'd be symmetrical the same length. Well, they were compressed down shorter. Here's the close up of the, this is a museum photograph. What they have on display in the museum. And in the center there, that round core, that is the sublimated on a full active backpack, the PLS, PLSS. Right. The batteries down on the bottom right, the oxygen tanks on the bottom left and the two oxygen perched tanks are at the top. Right. What's on the ground beside that leg is just two canisters with that sublimated core to keep the suit cool. They didn't need to have extra oxygen or anything to run around on earth. They just needed to keep the suit cool. And that's what you see. You see that core in there. Pretty amazing. This is Apollo 15. That is the opposite side. I was straight across from Quadrant 1. On it Quadrant 3, there's a shooting in from Quadrant 3. And you can see the scratch marks down on the bottom and the wrinkle on it. And then on the right is Apollo 17. They never replaced the bell housing underneath it when they were doing the simulations. They fixed the rest of the machine up, but they got it off the ground. They got the legs adjusted right for it. They got it back up off the ground. But the same scratches are on there. There are identical scratches on there. And the wrinkles still in there. Close enough for government work, Scott. Yeah. Pretty amazing, eh? Studies. Show us that they're simulating. This is the hammer and the feather. Okay. And they drop the hammer and the feather. Great beside the strap that broke. That great big strap. You saw the cables that were on the rover. That is the heaviest piece of equipment that they would need. Right? On those little tiny cables. This is a a gantry lifting strap. For these would lift that machine off the ground. And there it is broken on the ground. And what the world is a feather doing on the moon? Well, that's where they did this. Simulate the that they were in a matter gravitational fall. Yeah. The whole fall at the pier. The same time. So they nicely set it up so that they dropped it. So it would be right beside. So when they shot the hammer and the feather, they're also shooting. Reminiscent a Galileo in the leaning tower and piece of it. Right. But they made sure they dropped it so that the strap would be in the shot. That's why they dropped it in that spot. Okay, this is fall 11. And that's why I close all of those cars down the bottom right there. You Google that to pull out cars actually in the photograph. At the top there with the arrow. Yep. That's the car. And you can see it on the top right. Scott Scott Scott. This is awful. This is so amateurish. Okay, flip to the next one for more more than one car here. There's another one. Oh, I'm breathless. It's it's a jet. It's a jet. Over to the right on the rocks. You can see where the car is way back in the distance there. Over to the right of the rocks. There's more cars that are buried sticking out. Once kind of happened. The other one's kind of upside down. It's a virtual junkyard. Is what you're looking at. And you realize in the 60s, most people don't realize that is a didn't recycle metal the same way. It's quite a mouth. They put a mouth in yards and disposed up in that way. Right. How do you like that one? That's everybody loves it. Or that. Yeah. Wow. Greatest think of now. African lunar material and dust. Well, you know, you know, the the spray insulation foam that they use to cover metal. Yeah. 9-11. I'll cover and insulate the steel so it doesn't burn. Yeah. They use the same kind of stuff. Disney use the same kind of stuff to do it. If you look at the old Star Trek, they made the rocks for for the original Star Trek. How do the same kind of stuff, right? So this is how this is how they prep the set. Right. They just sprayed all of that down on it. Now, when you look at this when you look at this vet that is smashed up there in the windshield's trash down. It's quite a bit shorter at the front, but what people may not realize is that it was a fiberglass car. So the metal didn't like it didn't have metal. It rippled up when it got into a front end accident. The fiberglass would just break off. Right. So what you're looking at, you can see the one arrow there I'm showing the front axle sitting there to the rear. And that is the tow bar is still left in place on the front of that thing. The back of it is very distinctive. You can't miss a you can't miss a 1960s car vet for the shape of that. And there's absolutely no way that a rock would look like that to have the rear axle sitting there like that. And that perfectly round shape and the rear fenders. My stomachs just did not so over the absurdity of all of this. Now down this is this is this is the same crater that ancient aliens found the robot head. Right. Well, it's actually just a doll's head. I've found it down here as well. And there's other things that entire pilot stones down in the middle there. That's just a pile of juncts. There's big truck axles and all kinds of stuff in their transmission. You name it and see more cars right at the bottom of the hill there. This is just pathetic. There's a there's a 59 teabird down at the bottom of there. Now this is a central station. This powers all of the experimental equipment on it. You can see that it's between the different missions. They just left it laying down on its back on the ground. The dirt is stuck to it and it's actually rusted the metal. You can see that on the bottom left. The zoom in there. You see the metals all rusted. So it's just been laying around. Okay. So though. But it shouldn't rust on the moon either because there's no atmosphere and no moisture. Well, considering the fact that the equipment is said to be prepared in a clean room, put it in a rocket, unload it, set up and then photograph right away. How much time would it have to do any of this stuff? You take it out of the box and you set it up and you take a photograph of it. It's got to be perfectly clean, right? Just so sloppy. They were so sloppy the way they did all of this. Now, what is intentional about this is the astronauts have peeled the foil back to show you that there's nothing inside of it. This is supposed to be packed full of, first of all, it's supposed to have radio communications. It's supposed to collect all of the data from all of the other experiments and relay that information back to the earth as well as power all of that other equipment. Okay. And if you look at the so-called computer cables at the bottom, those bands there, that's just translucent film. There's no wires in it. You can see right through it. There's nothing in there at all. Down on the bottom left on the right hand picture, that piece of steel there, that's an electrical conduit, and up to a switch that looks exactly like what you'd see on an oil furnace. All the computer stuff is supposed to be underneath the bottom panel of that, but there's supposed to be a battery with its both twice the size of a car battery and they're powering it. And then the nuclear power generator, the RTG, powers and recharges that battery for it. There's no battery in there. That's showing both sides of it with the foil torn off. There's nothing in that machine at all. This whole thing is a joke, Scott. This, that, can you imagine that thing is supposed to send the information back to earth? There isn't even a proper antenna on it. Nothing. This shot is Paul 12, and this is the same piece of equipment with the experimental package attached to it. And then when you see the little crisscrosses down there, that's where the foil was piled up on it. And then it just came down to the bottom thing. That's exactly what it is. The previous image you were looking at, this is the same thing as it set up. There's absolutely more preposterous mold on the moon. Well, yeah, it's been laying around. First of all, while they're rehearsing, none of it's functional. You realize that they did all this just, they're using the same equipment that they did to practice with. They probably thought at one time they were going to go to the moon, right? What's going to happen? They didn't go and put equipment down or anything else. They just simply are using the same equipment that they were practicing with, which are just mockups. None of the equipment is real. They're just mockups for them to play with. The only thing that was actually running and functioning was the rover. It was the only actual piece of equipment. And here's another piece of equipment on the bottom, on the left hand side. The arrow's showing down there. You can actually see water standing in there. It's perfect for moving flat. There's no water on the moon to hamps another dramatic reputation that this was taken on the moon. Just so insulting, Scott, it's so insulting from being able to end. Right. You take this out of the equipment bay or the bay in the, in the lamp, set it on the ground and take a picture of it. How could it look like this? How could you get like that within a minute or so? After you set it up, you take a picture after you set it up. You can see the water is dried back on the right hand arrow there. The water is dried back and the mud is just kicked onto it. And there's actually green mold around the edge. The same equipment is left lying around. That's a 12 on the left hand side and a 14 on the right. It's just been out in the sun baking until it started to crack. So where do you look at the top? Where do you summarize this was taken? The landfill site, which is still in operation today, which is not only a military but a NASA landfill site, is on the southeast corner of sender lake. What's like? Sender Lake in Arizona. That's the, sender lake is the mockup they did of the lunar surface where they put all the craters and blue all the craters in. So it was actually shot in, in Arizona. Well, I've had other people tell me to look other places because they believe it was other places. But then I went back and I looked at the log files. I studied all the astronauts. I studied all the log files, all their schedules, everything else. And they were flying back and forth between Florida and Arizona. And if you realize these guys, I mean, you can't just make those things up. Because those schedules are there and those astronauts, I mean, they're media magnets. They're being interviewed every day. So they have to be where they said they're going to be. You can't interview a guy if he's off there, if he's in Australia or he's somewhere else. Like every day they were in the media. They're being interviewed while they're doing the training, everything else because there was such an eye for butter. And the log file, when they say they took the T-38 trainer and flew from here to here, that's probably where they were. Well, that comes right up to the lift up. Their schedules go right up to the lift up. Okay, because the only two places they can be. Florida or Arizona? Well, they had simulators in both. Right. They had the large pantry crane. They did the practice simulation of landing the thing. This suggests to me that Stanley Kubrick may not have had to have been involved. And so much of this is so amateurish. I don't believe this is consistent with his standards. I think he would have walked away from it. I think I think the NASA did this on their own. Like I said, when I said they weren't capable of faking it. They didn't even really try. Yeah. Okay, they still filmed it. They couldn't fake it. They couldn't get there and they couldn't fake it, but they still filmed it. And that's what you're looking at. This is the infamous all 17 flag. And you can see that it's soaking wet. Okay, no bones about it. People say it's shadows or is this or it's reflection of this or whatever is soaking wet. Okay, we've already been looking at water on the set. Okay. On the left, that's that's Jack. Harrison Smith. Jack Smith, if you like. He actually they're just playing around in the mud. So he just picked up some mud and smeared it all over his arm there. And two photographs later, it's washed off again. And you can't have mud on the moon anymore. Then you can have water or air. That is mud. You can see that the suit is wet where it's been washed up. Yes. Okay. It's wet on the moon either. Mist. Little morning mist. Somebody said it could be dust. Well, there's no wind either. That's right. That's right. That's right. The fact of the matter is it just can't be there. Okay. This is the surveyor. Okay. Landed by itself. Didn't need people on order. Anybody out there? Need a transporter. Okay. What is interesting is the Russian. The machine is identical to this. The panels, everything, even the way they're cut out or identical. The only difference I found when I was studying it is the top panels. The high gain of tenon. These ones are supposed to be solar panels. And if you look, it's just a piece of particle board. With a one by three down the crown of it. Okay. And the other one, you can see where it is glued down to something else. It could have been old counter top or school desk or something like that. And they're reusing it here. Scott, the then Soviet Union and the Chinese must be fully aware that this was all an elaborate form. It will be out if they watch this show. And you can see there is standing water on top of the on the right there on that panel. Yes. You can quite clearly see it. And if you really got a good thing, you can see where you wiped this finger because the cuff checklist tells them to wipe their finger. The mirror, the panoramic mirror on this thing is just covered in dust. Where you can even see a reflection from that little mound there in the water. Yes. Absolutely. But the panoramic mirror is pointing on an angle down and it's covered in dust. The rest of this machine is absolutely whistle clean. I don't know how the thing is covered in dust. And here's an of course of it rains. Everywhere. And they're not going to get up 24 feet up in the air to clean this off. Over. They did manage to take a photograph of it. This photograph is supposed to be a docking sequence in space, but not on the lunar surface. Scott, this is all just it bear scenely bad. It's so amateurish. I'm just in shock. This one's really going to get you. Okay. When I was looking back through all the PDS, a pressure test, they got to about 8 PSI and it blew the window out. That's about all I can handle. That's why they only claim to have 5.5 PSI inside the machine. So they duct tape it back together and they put a rain guard on it. Well, the rain guard got broken somehow probably when they were lifting it with those straps, right? So on the right hand side, there is the window. And of course, even the seal on the windows broke in between the two lures of glass and the paint's peeling up inside. Now the photograph on the right is said to be taken halfway to the moon in zero gravity. So in zero gravity, water is running down the window. And it's supposed to be 240 below zero and would be frozen if it were real. And it's all absurd. It's all just absurd beyond belief, Scott. Observe beyond. This is just mock up equipment that they were using to do the filming. None of it's real. None of it's functional. Okay, and it was used like this is exactly the same equipment for all six missions. The same rover, the same limb, everything is being used over and over again. God. Okay, and of course, you can see there's no footprints around anywhere near that can. On the mood. Like I said, if I found the pizza boxes, I'd know what I know. I know, I know. God. I got tons more. This one's great. Look at that. Look at that nose cone of that rock. I got there. That missile. In the top right. Yeah. That's it in the background. This is a polyphor team. Okay. And in the center picture, you can see where the nose cone is there. Those are two cars up on their sides. Wow. Okay. Now down in between, you see the round on the left car up on its side. Yes. Just look over a little bit. You'll see a perfectly round ring. That's about a 59 Ford with the continental kid on it. That's the tires sitting up there buried in the dirt. That's another car sitting in there. And then on the bottom right, I didn't use another photograph just to the right of this photograph. The next picture over on the bottom. That is the Bentley that they even mentioned in audio and it's in the transcript. A Bentley. That's the Bentley. You can see that car sitting there. One of the most expensive cars in the world in the landfill. Yeah, but they threw them out. Probably all those presbytes. Now this is Apollo 11. Now Apollo 11 weren't so bold when they were doing stuff. They simply took a photograph of the equipment. So there's a close up of what's down inside that crater. And you can see the top arrow there. That's a, that's a gear with the chain on it. Running down. Those are all gear cases. And then there's a great big case down on the bottom. And it's got this big arm sticking out on it. Kind of almost a bucket scissor arm. Climb sticking out. That's the actual gear case sitting right there. And like they've, like KipTig has tried to hide most of this stuff and erase it and blur it. And then you can see that the chain is using Photoshop effects on it. Right to make it grainy and everything else. But they're all right there. That gear case is the same. That, that chain at the top is just a dead giveaway. Right. But all of that stuff down there is just scrap metal parts. Jump. Yep. Now you can see how the astronauts. All of 14. They're using the handle there to point out where that rock is. That face is right. Yeah. Once you understand that the, that the astronauts are pointing it out. Okay. There are many ways to point it out. Sometimes they just get off the rover and take a walk out and around it and back. They'll just walk around it and back and we'll see it sticking out of the dirt or whatever. That's how they pointed out. Sometimes they use this kind of method. I wouldn't have found that unless I started to understand how the astronauts are pointing it out. Yeah. You could just say, oh, that's just an unusual rock that looks like a face. Okay. But it's painted. That's an Indian head and the band is painted on the rock. This is a, that's a, that's a ball bag. You know, when you go grab 100 for the driving range. Yeah. Well, some of the golf courses back in the 60s. They just had little miniature golf bags that you carried the motor. Right? And the GC on the bottom. Is a golf course. Wow. And of course, then I had to throw the C rock in too because that's how I want to get rid of the C. This is Apollo 11. That's the C rock in Apollo 11. And of course, the inset one there is the actual C rock on Apollo 16. Right? I have found that same rock. And I can't, can't remember which one I didn't find it in. I found it at a 5 out of 6. I mentioned that rock is in there because he's using the same sound on the same location. This one, they took a lot of trouble. They had to trench this out to lift this rock up. And that shows you how they sprayed the equipment on the top left there. So it's like a, they used a plaster or concrete, whatever to make the rock itself. And all kinds of unusual pieces, whatever's on the grounders, sticking it in there for filler. And then they're putting that spray on. The same as they did over the cars, right? That's the spray. Like it's a plain mold spray or whatever. But you can see it's shot on the rocks laying on its side. If it got on there over time, when it was laying down, it would be, it would fall vertical onto it. And it would have shot sideways on and stuck this way, you can see it. But you can see the clear line on where they were doing it. Right? And if you back, I went up a bit, back that other one back up. On the right, you can see that there's a steel bar there with rope tied around it. See the rope tied around the knots? I'm looking at it. I see the end of the bar down here towards the right. The arrows are pointing at various aspects of it. Yeah, where the rope is tied around. There's rope tied around each one. There's the knots