Donate.

Advertisement

KEY PLAYERS PT1

Please select playlist name from following

KEY PLAYERS PT1

3 Comments

Please login to comment

Video Transcript:

The story of the first movie The story of the first movie Little bit, they know what kind of situation we're on for And frankly, it's still very hard to believe It's really happened here today It's still very hard to believe What's really happened here today The story of the first movie The story of the first movie The story of the first movie The story of the first movie The story of the first movie The story of the first movie The story of the first movie The story of the third image The story of the first occupy a small tribute And the pictures photography When I apex myself ЧтобыGreat dichotic Respect Seriously, this is Premiere This is exactly what I've been Coronavirus Reminds me Hee Yeah, yeah Interestingly, she was the one of the few leading candidates for this. She was not currently working for the Met. She is working for the Foreign Office technically. That's the technical phrase, but I think most people think that she is probably doing something involving working with the security services. But I think it's her terrorism experience that will be very valuable. It has to be one of the top challenges for the police, the risk of a serious terrorist attack. I'm a rauding attacker, because it's often described somebody with a gun taking to the streets of London as something the Met is very much training to deal with. One of the issues that Crescer did it will have to deal with is a concern that there might not be enough officers willing to carry a gun, not compulsory, for the Metropolitan Police, because officers involved in shooting tend to get criticised and even investigated by the authorities for their role. What I'm concerned about is anyone that may wish to attack us again, and I'm sure it will happen. We predicted this would happen. What about all the other major cities where sometimes armed backup could be 10 or 20 minutes away. Now it's all at London being well protected and I think this will certainly make many police officers do not want to be armed, that will now reconsider wanting to be armed. And I think that will be one of the priorities for the Metropolitan Commission and the Home Secretary. She's been at the heart of some very big inquiries for the Met already. Absolutely. I mean some of the most difficult things the Met is dealt with. Crescer did it was the commander of that operation, so she was in the control room hearing all the information coming in from the teams on the ground. Her decisions being written down by somebody stood next to her and she gave the command to stop the man that they were following, the man who turned out to be Jean-Charles de Menezes. And she has always said stop not shoot, but he was shot dead on the tube and that was one of the Met's darkest days. I think it's a good way to do that, actually, because I think the police basically were out of order basically. There's people on the platforms, there's people on the trains. Nobody's heard anything from any of those. Nobody's seen anything of those people and there was no need to have shot him so many times. That was totally above the call of duty. Crescer did it, disappointment is not without controversy. 12 years ago she oversaw the flawed police operation that led to the death of Brazilian electrician Jean-Charles de Menezes, mistaken for a suicide bomber and shot by armed police inside a London tube station. The Menezes family have released a statement expressing their serious concern at the appointment. They say at the helm of the police on that fateful day when Jean was killed was Crescer de Dake. The message of today's appointment is that police officers can act with impunity. The police are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. They are not going to be able to do anything with the police. From Commander Kressien Kimstädin quick Comander Kressienes. personally blamed for what happened. The met police a guilty, but its officers walked free. Public confidence in the police needs to be earned and this can only be done by demonstrably showing that there have been changes to police operations but also to police accountability. And we strongly feel that by bestowing medals and promotions to the officers that are involved in John Charles's killing makes the mockery of any real commitment to that process. Her actions on that day was scrutinized in great detail during an old Bailey Health and Safety prosecution and at a public inquest, Barton Array moved the old Bailey juric ruled against the met. Barton Array moved the old Bailey juric ruled against the met but said mistake should be absolved of any personal culpability. Not only for the family of John Charles's Domenezze but also for many, many campaigners and community groups should always be linked with that particular spectacular mistake by the met shooting a totally innocent man. But one former home secretary said any move to block the appointment would have been completely wrong. It would be absolutely outrageous and if that was used again against Chris Adidick, it would send out a message that it is basically impossible to get anybody to head up major police forces except time servers who've kept their nose clean and never taken a risk. The met had to deal with the phone hacking inquiry where it was accused and there were resignations because it hadn't tackled its links to the press in particular, its close links with the press. She was involved in putting forward changes to the Metropolitan Police recommended by the Stephen Lawrence inquiry which came after the death of Stephen Lawrence the team. It should be noted Rohit that we are in a period of handover between the former head of the Metropolitan Police and the new head of the met, Chris Adidick. So Bernard Hogan-How has done his last day in the office, Chris Adidick is now in charge and and frankly this is the greatest possible challenge that could face any Metropolitan Police Commissioner and it is one that the entire operation that Scott Lignard is trying to face this A court heard he'd locked himself in the car while witnessing the murder of one of his own officers before leaving the scene. He told the jury the attack happened just as he was being driven out of the Palace of Westminster after ministerial meeting. Hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi hi, hi, hi Hey, hi, hi, hi Hi Mommy and Adudmawa and Grandpa give腐爸爸 treated. F and not the main gates known as carriage gates. The firearms officers said they had been told quite clearly to be at the members' entrance in the Colomade on Wednesdays the day of Prime Minister's questions, but a series of senior officers contradicted that evidence. The coroner has ruled its possible PC Palmer's death could have been prevented if armed officers had been at the gates. The coroner has ruled the city of the city. The coroner has ruled the city of the city. Bedside I'm reloading your fingers with daytime. I'm a big car, I show you a big car. What? You reckon now it's getting trouble if I like, shots, you dare. Enough. How much trouble? A lot. We don't even fight like that in our world. How can I just try? I'm just curious though. Just be curious. About like, there. One more? No. Is that not worth it? All right, all right. All right, can I get my bullet? No. Okay. Taking place. And I can't emphasize enough how much security is part of this place. You know, on a normal walking day, a working day, you might walk past armed police, maybe on a dozen occasions, perhaps more. So the sense of shock that finally something like this has taken place here of all places is profound. There's an area called Carried Gates, which is normally close to the public. You can only get in with a security passes. There's always armed police on the gate there. There's always armed police on the gate there. But someone rushed through that, got through the security gates and assaulted the police. So, I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. I'm going to get my bullet. After hearing me suit being shot by an armed officer, I'm going to get my collaborate with gymnasts again, of course or year after you become social media only. Watch out for fatal shots or medical effects or pier عنjadas. It's all talking about spaced out effects. It's all about it. It's all about it. officer. The Craig told the jury first and foremost I was a police officer so I went to open the door to get out. One of the PCs quite rightfully said get out make safe go shut the door. One of the PCs quite rightfully said get out make safe go shut the door. I had no personal protective equipment, no radio, two colleagues with me who were quite traumatised by what they had seen so we moved out and I began coordinating the response you saw. His actions that day were utterly unforgivable. You know a police officer's natural instinct when you see a colleague being stabbed is to get out and help him. First and foremost always unmistakably that is what you do policing is a family. You will also be aware that I personally was a witness to yesterday's events, part of yesterday's events including part of the tragic attack on PC Armored. As with all police officers I therefore had a duty to secure my evidence and produce statements yesterday evening which I did before resuming my role leading our response to this incident. Two days ago it was the attacker who crashed his car on the other side of that fence came around the corner and went through this gate stabbed and killed a policeman and then was shot dead again. Today a lot of security a lot of tourists and a lot of traffic. All the roads around this building opened today the UK open for business. Here's a beam leaving the power of Westminster. In Westminster the 4th of patrol security forces through south the Paralympic building bring up the inside. In Westminster the 4th of patrol. Security forces through south the Paralympic building bring up the inside. The British people will be united in working together to defeat those who would harm our shared values. Values of democracy, tolerance and the rule of law. Values symbolised by the houses of Parliament. Values that will never be destroyed. On Tuesday the Home Secretary told us the deportation of Abokutada was underway on Wednesday it stopped. On Tuesday she told us there was no appeal to the Grand Chamber on Wednesday and appeal was underway. Yesterday the Home Office said the appeal deadline was Monday night but the European Court officials said it was Tuesday night. On Tuesday night while Abokutada was appealing to European court judges the Home Secretary who thought the deadline was Monday night was partying with X-Factor judges. When the Home Secretary is accused of not knowing what day of the week it is then confusion and chaos has turned into fast. This fast has serious consequences. Additional delays, a greater risk Abokutada will be put out on bail and a risk he will sue the Government. So did the Home Office get specific assurances from the European Court the deadline was Monday night. If so will they publish them if not why not? Why did they not pick up the phone to sort it out? The Home Office was told by journalists on Monday nearly 24 hours before Abokutada was arrested that the European court officials were saying the deadline was Tuesday. Did they do anything about it? I hope her interpretation is right but our best there is uncertainty and several eminent lawyers are now saying that they agree with the European Court. So why take the risk? What was the harm in waiting until Wednesday night? Why create a legal loophole for Abokutada's lawyers to exploit? We all want Abokutada to be deported as soon as possible under the rule of law and kept off the streets in the meantime. But both those things are now less likely because of her actions. On Tuesday I warned that there was a troubling level of confusion around this case. Even I did not imagine the confusion was this great. When will this Home Secretary sort this out? The Home Office was told that the Home Secretary was not the case. Starting revelations about the clerics' dealings with the security services are contained in this document. CX Judgment, justifying the continued detention of Abokutada in Belmarsh Prison under the emergency anti-terrorism laws. Much of that hearing took place in secret in a basement chamber in the building behind me. But information from this judgment has emerged that clearly shows how MI5 acknowledged the extensive influence of Abokutada and how it might help keep terrorism off the streets of the United Kingdom. Now my son Begg became famous when he was locked up by the Americans in Guantanamo more than ten years ago. But this year he spent months in jail on terror charges after returning from Syria. The case against him suddenly collapsed on Wednesday after MI5 handed over a series of documents. They apparently back up Mr Begg's claims that MI5 knew about his trip to Syria. And he insists the security services promised he would not be prevented from going. A home affairs correspondent, Dasha Nassoni, has spoken exclusively to Maisen Begg and she joins us now from Birmingham, Dasha. Did MI5 withhold vital information from the police and prosecutors about what they knew about Maisen Begg's activities in Syria? Sources here tonight, Christianin say the West Midlands force and prosecutors are furious about the late disclosure. And they say had they known about MI5's dealings with the former Guantanamo detainee before he was arrested, then he may never have been charged. Well look, I've just been imprisoned for seven months. I've been interrogated, I've been questioned, I've had the entire weight of the British establishment which includes all of its arms from the prison service to the police service, to the intelligence services, to the homesack, the home office, the home office. And prior to that, I was imprisoned in Braggarang and Guantanamo. I was interrogated by the CIA, by the FBI, by the MI5, by military intelligence. I'm probably one of the most scrutinized people in the world. We did port Maisen Begg's claims to the home office but didn't receive a response. Here at MI5, the Spooks face their biggest crisis in years, apparently called liars, people who collude in torture, who don't tell parliament the truth, and not by some bunch of woolly minded do gooders, but by the country's leading judges. It's serious and today it's gone very public. Because this morning, the MI5 boss, Jonathan Evans, fought back in the Daily Telegraph, MI5 bosses simply don't do this. Abu Hamza may be known best for his incendiary speeches outside the Finsbury Park Mosque, but his defence lawyer is claiming that during these years, the Egyptian-born cleric was actually in a dialogue with MI5, trying not to inflame but to contain the more radical elements among his followers. Today there is more terrorist activity coming at us more quickly and it can be harder to detect. I said in my mansion house speech two years ago that I feared that even after a string of successful disruptions, we had not yet reached the high watermark. Sadly, that's proved to be the case. Every time I hear that Barb has been released early or he was on bail for two years and so has been wandering the streets of America free. In fact, I hear he's now married with children himself. It fills me with anger because it points to complicity with the American Secret Service in his role in Pakistan. And that suggests then that whilst but Barb was running the training camps, training people to commit mass murder, that was with the full knowledge of the American Secret Service. It doesn't diminish what he did. He was directly responsible for the deaths of dozens and dozens of people and four and a half years is totally inappropriate. If you look at our system for example, you get more than that for some motoring offenses. Certainly you can get more than that for burglary without injuring a single person. So to be responsible for the deaths of 52 people, so four and a half years and be released is just and say that that means he's paid his debt to society just begging his belief. If he was running those training camps with the knowledge of the American Secret Service, it's inconceivable he wasn't passing information of people who were attending those camps to the Americans. So that then begs the question, why didn't Americans tell the MI5 or if they did tell MI5 why wasn't something done? The Intelligence and Security Committee is most scathing about MI6. The agents lack of interest in Adabalajo after he was arrested in Kenya, the committee found deeply unsatisfactory. And MI6's role in combating jihadism, amounted the committee found to do practically nothing in his case. The look basically was happening. I went to study in Kenya and when I got to Kenya in a particular village, we were rounded up by Kenyan troops basically and were taken to basically a prison cell. And we were all interrogated one by one. And they said that when my turn came, I didn't speak to them. Of course it was generally like here, you say no comment and so forth. I wouldn't accept you to speak to them. And he said that basically the officer said you're not in the UK. He said basically taking his private part size at our FU, basically if you don't speak. Did he tell you that he was physically and sexually assaulted? He told me he was physically assaulted. He told me he was sexually threatened and he indicated for more I know of him when he said I couldn't, I feel ashamed to tell you what happened to me. As far as I understand that, it's sexual abuse because it's nothing. He will feel shy to tell me about accept that. He was holding tears back when he was mentioning it. So your judgement is that he had quite a profound change of personality. Definitely. He just became... He was almost like his mind was somewhere else but his presence was there. When his return back, he had been stopped. And subsequently after that, he was followed by M.R.5. He said they came to his house. They were saying knocking at his door, knocking his door. He pretended that he wasn't there. But they were knocking so much he thought to himself, looking at what I need to kind of like, coming show my face. The M.R.5 were destroying his life. As he knew it was over, he had no control over his own future. We've seen this pattern so many times over and over again. Had I not spoken to hundreds of people who have been exactly the same situation, maybe I can't really say either way. But in this situation, every single thing he's described is exactly as we've heard it before. What was his reaction to being approached by the Security Service at my phone? His wording was, you know, they're... they're... they're... they're... they're... they're just keeping... they won't leave me alone, basically. Initially, they wanted to ask him whether he knew certain individuals, basically. After him saying that he didn't know these individuals and so forth, what he said is they asked him whether he'll be interested in working for them. Did he give any indication to you that he was capable of such horrific violence? It didn't make sense because his whole concept, you know, was... he just wanted to go and live in the Muslim land, basically. What's the big deal? There's over 2 billion around the world! Between 2012 and 2016, Masood was in contact with Al-Mahadirun supporters who were being actively investigated by MI5. And he expressed support for 9-11. But MI5 has said that neither of these facts warranted reopening its investigation into him. But security sources have told NewsNight that Masood was associating with extremists in Luton. Once again, he was picked up on MI5's radar because he was in contact with these men who were convicted of plotting a terrorist attack on a territorial army base in the town. We were on the bridge and we were walking around and from the desert, we'll go get some tea, some tea, and we'll go get some tea. We got the news about the summer supper in the shop. Now we didn't see if we were away from the restaurant. We were in the restaurant having some tea and when the outbreak happened. Can I keep your name? It's Osma. Osmas does not. The words of Theresa May, who earlier this year on so-called Holocaust Memorial, they said that, we must never forget where prejudice can lead, and she also said that by pushing the Holocaust education, we'll safeguard the memories of survivors and learn the lessons for generations to come. There's a reason I mentioned this. Because right now Theresa May and the British government are complicit in a Holocaust in Yemen. I mean, you could call it many things. Some people might say Holocaust is too difficult to work, but it's a mass genocide of people in Yemen. It's premeditated and it's with intent. It's not accidental. And the British government is complicit and that's why they give their men in, they're men occupying a radio on the red carpet treatment. Unfortunately, I'm not surprised by the treatment that God I've fought and I salute those people who came out today to protest. The main one who's been protesting against this war criminal, because a time will come not too long, where Theresa May, Boris Johnson and all of these people who have been promoting and supporting bin Salman and the Zionists in their genocide on Yemen, the Holocaust on Yemen, will they'll be taken to a court like the one in Yemen, and they will be put behind bars for eternity. His administration later clarified that while the U.S. no longer sees Israeli settlements as an obstacle to peace, it does not consider them helpful either. Theresa May, for her part, went as far as scolding former Secretary of State John Kerry for a speech criticizing Israeli policy. Israel saw this as a welcome change of tone. The U.S. has always been its closest ally, whereas Europe has been more critical for now that a Nahu might enjoy even stronger support from Washington and win the backing of post-Brexit Britain. In January, Britain refused to send a high-level delegation to a Middle East peace conference organized in Paris. It voiced concern that the meeting would only exacerbate tensions. It also snubbed the closing declaration by 70 countries that stressed only a two-state solution could resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Just as Britain works on its divorce from the European Union, many see in its new co-signist with Trump and Israel a way to keep warm in an uncertain post-Brexit world. The Prime Minister yesterday said she was calling a general election because Parliament was blocking Brexit. But three-quarters of MPs and two-thirds of the Lords voted for Article 50. So that's not true, is it? And a month ago, she told her official spokesman to rule out an early general election and that wasn't true either, was it? She wants us to believe that she is a woman of her word. Isn't the truth that we cannot believe a single word? Yes! Isn't the truth that we cannot believe a single word? Yes! Yes! This, yeah! The Prime Minister's extremism, when there are other forms of extremism we need to tackle. But that is untrue too. We want to defeat all forms of extremism, ideological or not, and where it is driven by ideology we draw no distinction. Doing neo-Nazi and Muslim-is-Limus extremist. Our definition of extremism is the local or active opposition to fundamental bitter crimes, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and the mutual respect and tolerance of different tastes and beliefs. And we will through the immigration rules require all foreign religious workers and pastoral roles to speak English. Other critics say it's all too complicated. Attitudes are too deep-y ingrained, but actually what we regard as extreme, lots of people find climate feeling, that some honest people don't turn violent, they should just put up with behaviour we don't very much like. To these critics we must say infatically, no. We know there is a link between non-violent extremism and violent extremism. We believe in democracy because the alternative leads to the arbitrary abuse of power. We would deny extremism the opportunity to spread their messages of hate by introducing vanymordist extremist groups or short of existing terrorist prescriptions, we believe in equality because the alternative is discrimination and suffering. We will require peace forces to record anti-Muslim crimes, as well as anti-Semitic crimes. We plan a step change in the way we help people to learn the English language. We will bring you incentives and penalties of sharp reduction in funding for translation services and a significant increase in the funding available for English language training. We will introduce extremism disruption orders, simple powers to be used against individual extremists who are inside hate food. We will bring in new powers for whistle glowers and a new extremism community trade. We will therefore develop a positive campaign to promote British values and show clearly the opportunities they bring. We will be more proactive in helping people from fear backgrounds understand the values that drive off foreign policy and international hate for it. Isn't the truth that we cannot believe a single word?