The Hong Kong Perplexity Dilemma Problem Covid-19 Coronavirus Masks Things Youll Never Hear Ponder

Video Transcript:

12. Do you find it strange that from January 2020 through July or so Hong Kong? You know Hong Kong, one of the largest cities in the world, only had three deaths from COVID-19. All is coronavirus, the most veriluit and deadly flu in 100 years or not. That's what they told us, right? You remember how they stressed its ability to spread or they are not value, was much, much higher, the spreading ability was much, much higher than regular flu. So based on this, the head of Harvard Verology in some 60 minutes interview, I think it was March of 2020, he said like we expect three quarters of the world or three-fists of the world, I forget exactly, but he said most of the world up to I think he said up to 70% will get coronavirus, the head of Harvard Verology said that. Okay? So everybody would say all the experts would told us how incredibly fast it's spread. Hong Kong, three deaths. What? Through for the first five or six months into it, three deaths. The Hong Kong has a population density that is in the top three in the world. It's like seven million people packed into a little tiny area. It should spread the coronavirus there like syphilis would spread around a whorehouse in dead wood. There are many effluent people, but most people in Hong Kong for this most part are packed on top of each other. They don't have an acre of land there. You know, they're also just like any big city, many poor areas, there's back alley, crime areas and poor places. Haven't you ever seen any Bruce Lee movies? A lot of them shoot shot Hong Kong, a lot of those type of slum areas even though overall it's affluent. You've seen their packed subways in videos and pictures. You've seen their packed trains. How could they have had three deaths for about six months? Was there some sort of unknown reason, some strange fermentation took place in the low main noodles of Hong Kong that in some way mimics the new Pfizer vaccine. People were eating their low main and getting vaccinated and developing immunity and didn't even know about it. There's something in the air in Hong Kong that protects the people that we can maybe bottle it up and bring it back here. We've heard at the time how ravaged at the time, you know, early on Italy was just ravaged from the coronavirus, just mass death. But at the same exact time, there was nothing going on in Hong Kong. How's that possible? So they know for sure, right, that it started in Wuhan, China, right? No denying that. You know how many people were traveling back and forth from Wuhan, that district, a huge business district, a district of China. How many people were going back between Wuhan and Hong Kong? Daily, potentially up to 10,000 people a day on a work day around December of 2019, right when the outbreak was starting. 10,000 people a day to Hong Kong to Wuhan back. If I'm right, I haven't surveyed every Chinese person. Maybe at the minimum, it's five to six thousand a day. Guess what? Diseases spread around for a few weeks before the first case is isolated and discovered, right? Do you think that government is just some omnipotent God that just can find the very first case, grab and tag the first guy who gets coronavirus and then they can announce it's this new thing and just from the first case, do you think it might spread around for four or six weeks before they truly understand what's going on? You know, even if that was the case, you know, and they just isolated it immediately. The first case just rode on a Hong Kong subway, right? Or one of the first cases, one of the first people coming and going from Wuhan probably made it his way back to Hong Kong. You know, nobody in Wuhan that got it initially made their way back to Hong Kong with thousands of people coming and going. You ever hear the term pack like sardines? That's the Hong Kong subway. It makes the London tube look like, you know, it's a private cabin on the Titanic. So Italy, that was ravaged by coronavirus had like 20 people probably flying back and forth a week to Wuhan, you know, but Hong Kong during the same time had like 50,000 people that had come and gone to Wuhan and came back to Hong Kong and they have three deaths. Now with this one especially, people have all sorts of ready-made excuses prepared. And my favorite and the most pathetic is, oh, they know how to handle it in Hong Kong. What? What does that even mean? But then they combine it with, oh, there are already used to wearing masks. What? Now I agree in these Asian cities, they were wearing masks more than in Rome or in New York City. I'll give you that. But it was mostly due to pollution. If you looked at pictures of crowds in Hong Kong or a lot of Asian cities, you'd have like 10 up to 20% of people in masks. Well, how was that helping the entire population of 7 million people during the four weeks or so was being spread around where they hadn't pointed at it, hadn't isolated, hadn't known exactly what they were dealing with. Again, they don't, the governments don't know exactly what they're dealing with it on the very first day of the very first case. Spreads around for four to six weeks before they could point at it. Obviously. So, so what if 20% of them were in masks? And if even if they do quote, know how to deal with it, well, nobody for, as it spreads around for the first four to six weeks, nobody even knows it exists. There's nothing to know how to deal with. This is a most non-sensical BS that people throw at you. They believe it. But it would need to be Hong Kong would be like, would need to be a hundred percent mask culture to make that lame argument that they know how to handle it in Hong Kong. I mean, even if that's the case in Hong Kong, it put themselves in masks since 1973. Does three deaths make any sense to you? With tens of thousands of people coming and going over the key points of December 2019 through February of 2020, it takes pure sophistry to explain a way that they only had three deaths in Hong Kong for about six months. Right now, they only have a hundred and seventy three. So at no point, it really started to go crazy with spreading and seven million people living on top each other. Only a hundred and seventy three deaths now. They know how to handle it. That's a fallacy. It's a fallacy of perfect compliance. They know how to handle it, assumes everyone is equally competent to handle it. That's impossible in seven million people. You're going to have all different types. People with seven million people packed on top of each other, you're going to have a million people out of those seven million that are in a category that they can't handle it. They have no idea how to handle it. You're going to have a million people that just can't comply, homeless, criminals, people who simply don't care and won't comply. We'll get up and talk in someone's face and get spit back and forth because they forget older people, dementia, people to dumb to properly comply. They have some sort of mental issue, workers who must travel in close proximity in vans that clean carpets or ride in a dump truck together, three guys in a dump truck or trash man that have to ride together that you're going to have a million people that can't comply. People throw at me this that if everybody would just comply, we'd be out of this. 20% of any population can't comply for these reasons. Is this so hard to understand? The fallacy of perfect compliance, that's just that's literal lunacy. Plus because of the cost of living, you're going to have hundreds and hundreds of apartment buildings where the occupancy for the two bedrooms should be two or three and it's five or seven because of the cost of living or poor migrant workers that have come to come into Hong Kong because of to work for the the affluent. I think they just go home and they don't they don't have any kids and they live in one two bedroom place by themselves. There's probably like seven people crammed in there. So three deaths. Don't ask me, well you told me Mr. Narrator what's going on. I'm not here to do that, right? I'm here to tell you that the whole story of this coronavirus thing on multiple fronts just breaks down. It doesn't hold up from a common sense perspective.