Weaponized Measles Mania - From Mickey to Mandate (SHARE! SHARE! SHARE!))

Video Transcript:

Good morning. My name is Dr. Tony Barg. I'm a licensed MD in the state of Illinois. I trained in pediatrics and rehab medicine on Iran and emergency room, pediatric emergency room in the inner city. And during that time, I witnessed several children after being in the vaccine clinic coming to the emergency room and set a set of epilepticus with asthma, even respiratory arrest. That was a while ago. And since that time, we've had an emerging field called epigenetics, which is the field of looking at the link between genetics and environmental toxins affecting people individually. Vaccines are not safe and effective for everyone. This cannot be a one size fits all. Not everyone has the same risk factors. But in the last 20 to 30 years, we have elucidated some things that are known as risk factors. They're called single nucleotide polymorphic variants. And these interface with things like drugs and vaccines very differently for different people. And this is not a one in a million type of issue. So there can be maybe up to 10 to 15% of people that are quite susceptible to different vaccines. And these are a minority, a susceptible minority, who are being left out in the rain without an umbrella. So while it sounds good and well that vaccines are safe and effective, just so you understand that they are legally classified as unavoidably unsafe. And the manufacturers are not liable. This is a liability free product that is being mandated on children who have epigenetics susceptibility to injury. And the injuries are serious, including death and chronic encephalopathy. And while there's only been two deaths from measles in this country since 2003, there's been at least 400 and some odd children who died from the vaccine. And according to Gregory Poland, who was a vaccinologist at Mayo Clinic, he has written an article called the Paradox of Measles, which states that you cannot eradicate a virus like measles with a live viral vaccine. You also will see that the majority of outbreaks, and while it is different in this community, because you've got a tight community of unvaccinated people where this measles outbreak is happening, but the majority of measles cases around the country are actually in the vaccinated. So this is a complex picture. It's not one-sided. There's a lot of great areas. It's very complex. The last panel would have you believe that it's not complex, that vaccines are safe and effective, and the vaccine prevents measles. And that if everyone's vaccinated, there won't be measles, and that is not true. The largest outbreak that New York City has ever seen was just a few years ago. It was started by a 22-year-old recent recipient of an MMR booster. And 35 to 40 people who had all been vaccinated got a vaccine strain measles. In Corpus Christi in 1983, there were over 400 students who had all been vaccinated. Ninety percent vaccination rates, 97 percent of which had antibodies, memory antibodies, and they still got measles. This is not a clear black and white picture. And if you eliminate exemptions, we all know how difficult medical exemptions are, because the requirements for medical exemptions are lagging about 30 years behind the science of the epigenetic risk factors. So if you eliminate these exemptions, you are basically making a large minority of people susceptible to very serious risks, including death. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. We know you're looking. Well, we know you're looking. Good morning. That was wonderful to meet you, Evan. Welcome. Thank you. So, it's been three decades. Can we be healthy? And we know. We know. We know. We do believe because we were the witness with our child, our first-hand witness after we came home from the doctor's office and saw this regression of a child that was perfect and then slowly fading away. The American Academy of Pediatrics and others continue to say that there is no link between vaccines and autism. They go on to say that the risk of not vaccinating could be even worse. What do you say about why, first of all, they're reluctant to talk about any possible link between vaccines and autism? Well, when you really think about it, the reason why is because there is such a huge business in pharmaceuticals. Paul Offett is one of these doctors who said, one of the reasons why fear of vaccines exists is because of the power of the anecdote as he puts it. We're up against personal and compelling stories and we have to find a way to make real science more compelling. Maybe somebody who also says that there are preventable diseases that people are dying from, that children are dying from because they're not getting vaccinated. People are also dying from vaccinations. Evan, my son died in front of me for two minutes. So you ask any mother in the autism community if we'll take the flu, the measles, over autism any fricking day of the week. So I think they need to wake up and stop hurting our kids and we're not telling people not to vaccinate. I don't understand why it's so freaking hard to comprehend we deserve safe shots and it's safer schedule. You have been able to say that your son is healed from autism. That is also something that the medical community says is not necessarily possible. Explain how you were able to get him from the way he was two or three years ago to where he is now, which is practically functioning. Recovered from autism, like thousands of other kids that are doing it. The following biomedical treatment, which is basically changing the diet, giving vitamins and supplements and detoxing the body from metals or Candida, which I never did a chelation with Evan. I just did all the other biomedical treatments and he recovered. And the reason why the medical community has such a hard time with this is because we are treating and healing of vaccine injury. I've got another study from Croatia and there were several cases of measles outbreaks occurring in children who had just been vaccinated. And so they looked at the string, they're having intensive surveillance of measles during this period of time. And so they looked at with this DNA or genetic fingerprinting what strains they were and it was the vaccine strain that they were infected with. So not only did they become sick from measles, from the strain that they were vaccinated with, but they were contagious. And this article, the key to this article is that it said that in the past, we would have never known this. It would have either been considered a different disease. It would have been consumed like they would have said it was rebella or something like that. Or they would have considered that it was just a wild type virus that the person was subsequently infected with before they had a chance to mount an immune response. But because now we have this added surveillance and this new technology that we can distinguish between strains, we're finding that these cases, we used to think that measles, mumps and rebella vaccines didn't shed and didn't cause disease. But now we're finding that for all three of them, not only is the immune response not what we thought, but that for rebella and measles at least for sure, I can tell you, that those people are shedding virus, have the potential to shed virus and be infected. And it's not just the people getting the vaccine that are getting the measles from the vaccine strain, but those who have not been exposed to the vaccine that are ending up with vaccine strain measles. Amy's post, my friend's kid is part of the outbreak. Too young for a vaccine and has gene mutation and a sibling that has severely brain damaged and nearly died from D-TAP. She had a few spots and mild temp and it didn't slow her down at all. Incidentally, when you get measles, the health department gets involved now. You get quarantined and testing. Hers was lab-confirmed vaccine strain measles. She recently had a play date with her friend whose kid was recently vaccinated. Vaccines can't prevent transmission when they get shed and guess who doesn't get quarantined. Her immunity is based on natural measles transmission and only exists in naturally acquired populations. Vaccines cannot nor do they promise immunity, only immune response. Fact. It isn't bad enough that most of these outbreaks were caused by vaccine strain measles, but they have to lie about the numbers on top of it. The mayor just announced is going to find a sheath that allowed children to attend that have not been vaccinated. What's your opinion on this? If I could find a way to find a mayor for a person so stupid. If I could think in this community, I would believe statistics that he's producing with the department of health, if they're coming off of the sasters, lying, progeny, cordiary, active that he just did with leg poisoning. When he started with the numbers of four and then it ended up to 400. And he's going to think that this community believes on a vaccine that has nothing tested as no background. As a matter of fact, there's more than one doctor who said that this vaccine has a potential harm in four or five years now. You can't see the doctor, you can't see the manufacturer, you can't see the city, you can't see this more on mayor. So he has the capacity to come in here and what, create panic with the mothers and children. If it has not been tested, what is this government enforcement of you taking this shot? This is being overhyped. Well, this is definitely being over promoted as a large and dangerous outbreak. It's an outbreak of measles. If you have millions of cases of measles, there'll be complications and fatalities. Right now we don't have that many cases of measles and we should speak a little more quietly. Right now we're actually panicking people. In terms of your practice, what would you estimate is the percentage of your patients that are not vaccinated for measles? Up until recently, and even now it's the majority of patients are not vaccinated for measles months of rubella. And you sent out a letter to your patients saying that despite this measles outbreak, there is no risk to their healthy child. How can that be true? What I said is that this measles outbreak does not pose a great risk to a healthy child. And quite frankly, I don't think it poses any risk to a healthy child. So again, the reasons that some of people are not wanting to get vaccinated doesn't have any reason to be in the religion. I should love the religion. It's not the thing that people can get barred to be organized. This is an independent opinion of a mother of six, seven, eight-year-old children that might have had some problem already and now has another problem and is the government force for vaccination. Do you think this is a good open-line? I hope not. I hope they go to court and the judge goes exactly the same way they did the right in the court. Why are you here coming up and going to go to the grocery? What did the rats used to do that? The Nazis did that. And because they did that and a great many other terrible things, we've gathered some good at the end of the war during the Nuremberg trials when we came to the conclusion globally that the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. And since vaccines have been deemed unavoidably unsafe, legally, in court, then to force this on the entire population is to play a game of Russian roulette when 15 to 20% of the population can't process the ingredients properly. Sending a police to enforce vaccination can, in some communities, backfire. It certainly isn't easy on anyone. So it's not something done easily. It can be done. But it's just not done easily. OK, this is the study everyone credits with sparking the vaccine autism debate and it's actually a study about a novel bowel disease discovered in children, which has long since been proven true. Wakefield and colleagues never had any data about the MMR vaccine and autism. They simply reported with the parents I told them. This study only looked at 12 children, which is very normal in a case series study. In eight children, the onset of behavioral problems had been linked either by the parents or by the child's physician with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccinations. We did not prove an association with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine in the syndrome described. Our logical studies are in a way that may help to resolve this issue. Study authors could not have been more clear that they didn't have any data to prove. We're denying the claims of the parents of the 12 children in the study about the decline in autism after the MMR vaccine. Mr. Speaker, I respectfully request the following excerpts from the statement written by Dr. Thompson be entered into the record. Now quoting Dr. Thompson, my primary job duties while working in the immunization safety branch from 2000 to 2006 were to later code lead three major vaccine safety studies. The MADDSP MMR Autism Cases Control Study was being carried out in response to the Wakefield Lancet study that suggested an association between the MMR vaccine and an autism-like health outcome. There were several major concerns among scientists and consumer advocates outside the CDC in the fall of 2000 regarding the execution of the Verstratian study. One of the important goals that was determined up front in the spring of 2001 before any of these studies started was to have all three protocols vetted outside the CDC prior to the start of the analyses so that consumer advocates could not claim that we were presenting analyses that suited our own goals and biases. We hypothesized that if we found statistically significant effects at either 18 or 36-month thresholds, we would conclude that vaccinating children early with MMR vaccine could lead to autism-like characteristics or features. We all met and finalized the study protocol and analysis plan. The goal was to not deviate from the analysis plan to avoid the debacle that occurred with the Verstratian Thymurusol study published in the Pediatrics in 03. At the September 5 meeting we discussed in detail how to code race for both a sample and the Verstratian Thymurusol sample. At the bottom of table 7 it also shows that for the non-verstratian Thymurusol sample, the adjusted race effect statistical significance was huge. All the authors on I met and decided some bind between August and September 02, not to report any race effects for the paper. Sometimes soon after the meeting we decided to exclude reporting any race effects. They co-authored the sketch of the meeting to destroy documents related to the study. Vaccines are safe. Autism is not a side effect of vaccine or to say it another way because some people don't hear this well. Vaccines do not cause autism. Vaccines do not cause autism. Vaccines do not cause autism. My name is Polytomy and my son was damaged by vaccine. Some people don't hear this well. My son has autism from vaccine. Vaccines do not cause autism. Today is Saturday and our son has had yet another seizure. He was born healthy and before I even gave him the chance to remain that way I consented to life savings vaccines. After each round of vaccinations he had reactions of Thresh and Exama. He had two rounds of MMR before 3 years old. It was then that the chronic skin burning diarrhea started and his language and cognitive development stopped. My son cannot talk, read or write. He has bowel disease, autoimmune disorder, and cephalopathy and seizures, all of which are termed autism by his doctors so that they don't have to admit what it is, adverse vaccine reactions. Those who profit from vaccines don't want to hear this well. The media who report on vaccines don't bother to research this well. But listen closely and hear me well. I traded the chance of him getting an acute, fully recoverable, normal childhood illness for chronic, lifelong, painful disorders. Once it in safe his life they distort his health. Vaccines can and did cause my son's autism. No, I really think we've over done it on the vaccines. It's funny how we've managed to program people to believe so thoroughly that vaccines are awesome. This was all set up with the polio and the smallpox. They said, yes of course vaccines are wonderful. When can I get a vaccine for this? Give me a vaccine that will fix this problem. We've got that entire mentality which is amazing to me. Because the vaccines are full of toxic chemicals and certainly I looked at the vaccines first. There's a great database of ours, database, vaccine adverse event reporting system. Very, very interesting. I've looked at it. I'm a computer scientist. I can go look at the number of countries looking at the words and what statistical distributions and whatnot. You can find a lot of things out from looking at the virus. One thing really striking is MMR. Is the vaccine, measles, mumps, and rebella. Andrew Wakefield connected that autism way back when, like 1998, I guess he had this paper in Lancet which was very interesting and he had taken these certain cases of kids with autism connected it to the MMR vaccine. He had a whole theory. In fact, he was into the idea of the gut, the gut brain access connection and disruption of the gut even back then. This is something that's been around is a theory for autism for a long time. And he targeted MMR but he didn't really explain what is it in MMR that's causing this. And I was frustrated by that as well. I confirmed in my studies of the virus database that MMR is associated with autism. And I wrote a paper on that and I proposed at the time that possibly, it was something somebody else had also proposed which was that the acetaminophen that is given, it was just to control the fever. Kids are often given that around the vaccine and that can become toxic to certain kids who can't metabolize it properly. So it turns out only recently did I figure out the connection to glutamate with MMR. It's truly amazing because MMR is one of the few vaccines that contain glutamate. And of course glutamate is toxic to autistic because they don't have manganese. That's my theory anyway. And so when you've got that extra glutamate directly injected in through the vaccine, it goes to the brain because of the influence of the glyphosate. The glyphosate actually opens up barriers to open up the gut barrier and it opens up the brain barrier which allows these things to get in. So then what I've done only recently and I haven't published this yet but I looked at MMR before and after 2002. You can take like a group, all the vaccines before all the vaccines after, same vaccine and just look at the reports of the adverse reactions, look statistically at the numbers to see which ones are occurring out differently. They ought to all be the same because it's the same vaccine but they're not. And so it's very, very interesting because the vaccines, the events that occur, the reactions that occur after 2002, one of them is autism. It predicts autism statistically significantly when you compare after 2002 with before 2002. And the doctors didn't get out. Because you got to do it. You got to do it. I can't even put on doctors but to make my life easier to go along with my parents and wife. I occasionally will go to a doctor's appointment if they make one and that's what I was doing. I was constantly doing research and that's when I came across this great article, this doctor wrote. And that's when I put two and two together with the great records with my mom that she kept. I was able to say bam, that's when it started. And when I got this shot, that's when the rash showed up. They didn't diagnose it as a rise for years later. They kept treating it as a reaction. No shit, it's a reaction. Guess what? 30 plus years later, I'm still in that reaction. Is allergic to yourself? Yeah. Because this immune system thinks he is a virus. Illuminum adgenents are using vaccines correct? Correct. Why are you looking at using vaccines? Because they make the vaccine more effective. Okay. And how do they do that? I don't know. Okay. What's an antigen? An antigen is a typically a protein that in this case it would be, if you're talking about vaccines, an antigen is a protein that causes a reaction and oftentimes is an infection, it's an infection agent, but not always. Isn't it true that an adjuvant will not only bind to the target antigen that's in the vaccine, but also to the impurities and byproducts such as the animal and human parts left in the vaccine or the manufacturing process? You're asking these specifics about physiology that I am not, that's not my area of expertise. But there's, okay, so you're not aware that there's a difference between the form that aluminum so it's ingested, take up an antigen form, when it's injected, it's in these nanoparticle forms. And in contrast, injected aluminum is our nanoparticles correct? They're there to create an irritant to the immune system so that the vaccine creates antibodies. And so there are actually these nanoparticles that are in the vaccine, right? Or do you not know? You're talking about specifics that are very detailed. Are the details important? I mean, you said that- Not in this case, because we're talking about a metal. It is not concerning to me because the amount of aluminum that we ingest in general, just through our diet is much higher than what we get through vaccines. There's no reason to believe that that amount, that additional small amount is anything to be concerned about. So you said that the quantity of ingested aluminum is small, or excuse me, is much larger than the amount of inject of aluminum and therefore you do it safe. Correct. Are you aware that the FDA provides that in terms of ingested aluminum, even the aluminum, the repressential less is actually taken up by the blood. Do you know that or not? I don't know the exact number. I understand that it is, it's taken up in an ionic form. Do you understand what I mean? I understand what you mean by that. I mean, it's in its smallest elemental form, that's how it's taken into the blood, right? Correct. And aluminum in ionic form is not able to cross the blood drain barrier, correct? I'm not aware that that's true. You don't know. I don't know that that's true. Okay. If you don't know this one. And antigen's bounds of aluminum are taken up by macrophages, correct? Yes. Okay. And macrophages present the stuff they gobble up to the parts of the immune system that create antibodies, correct? I believe so. I have not studied the actual mechanism of action. And they also travel to different parts of the body, through the brain, correct? Correct. And they're all positive materials that gobble up there. Isn't it true that most package inserts for most vaccines report in cephalolitis or in cephalopathy as a reported adverse event from vaccination? I would have to look at all the package inserts to be able to say yes or no to that. It is possible. Yes. Do any of the vaccines in the cephalopathy contain monkey kidney cells? I do not know. Blood serotonous cows. Do they do not know? Can you pick cell cultures? I do not know. Gelatin, who picks in cows? I don't know. MRC-5 human diploid cells. MRC-5 human diploid cells. Those are specifics that I typically do. Are you aware that MRC-5 diploid cells are cells cultured from the lung tissue and aborted fetus? I am aware that there are two vaccines out on the market. The MMR and the VZV that use a cell in the production of it, use a cell line from aborted fetuses from 1962 and 1966. Those are the only two aborted fetus tissue cell lines that are used. Isn't it true that there actually is recently been a new cell line, human cell line from aborted fetus tissue that has been approved for use in vaccines? I am not aware of that. And none of the aborted fetal tissue culture cell lines actually end up in the vaccine product? The vaccine does not have cells in it. Is cellular pieces from the aborted fetal tissue? That is potentially possible, yes. Isn't it true that in fact there is more of that cellular debris in the MMR, for example, and there is actually antigen? I don't know. Wait, what? So we're presented with an article from The Times of Israel with this photo, it's the first death by measles in Jerusalem, Israel, in 15 years. Why, oh, the poor baby had not been vaccinated and her parents hadn't been vaccinated. And what the video that was mirrored and the original video that was made about this was to point out something which, I mean, it jumps right out at me, even if I hadn't discovered it in the video and had just come across the article myself. I obviously would have been doing what this gentleman did in his own video, which is look at the marks. Look at the marks, okay, and look at this one in particular. Okay, do you notice anything yet, people? Do you see this is a little baby's foot? It has little wrinkles in the skin. You can see there's wrinkles in the skin. And then you can just literally see there's a circle, right? There's a circle shaped image that's been just paced over, over it to the point that you don't even see the wrinkles anymore in the skin. I mean, it's blatantly obvious in this particular instance that there has been a massive copy and paste job of this collection of supposedly measles dots, but it's the same, they didn't bother to change the orientation of it. You can rotate it a little bit to make it look a little different. No, they just went rubber stamp, rubber stamp, rubber stamp, rubber stamp. Oh, lots of them in here, rubber stamping all over the place, and it's the same stupid image of something that's supposed to, and measles doesn't even do this. Measles is just individual bumps all over the body, a big rash, right? So the point of making my little contribution to this heinous situation is let's just go backwards. This is the article. The Times of Israel toddler dies of measles in Jerusalem in first such incident in 15 years. Okay? Now, we all know Israel is fine upstanding nation, never does anything wrong or sneaky, Israel is just the epitome of honesty, right? So look, my browser is prompting me to increase the size of, I can enjoy the measles on this poor baby in full, full view. So now I just clicked on that and I wanted to save the image to, so I could make my video. So what do you do? You right click on it and you save the image, right? But when you do that, save image as, look what happens, look at the name of the image. I stock 85, 72, 85, 148.jpg. Okay? So let's just go back one more step here. I stock, okay? Because just to show you the, you know, the backward path I took. So this is Amateur Ratsr Solar who is mirroring the video. So she kindly put, as we always should do, we put the link to the original video. So I went to this gentleman's channel, Zach's channel and I watched his, I watched the video again and then I read the comments and, you know, brilliant people who are out there, who are awake, someone had the same ideas me and they said, go to stock photos, doctor holding beautiful newborn baby. And as you can see, I just posted here, thank you. I thought the same thing and was about to search the original undockered photo. Thank you so much for finding it for us. Okay? But the thing is you don't even have to look for it because these idiots at the times of Israel did not even think to change the name of the photo. So they're claiming, they're showing us the proof as plain as day that they doctored a stock photo. They doctored a stock photo which is available right here. Okay? And look, you can see the little wrinkles on the little child's photo. And I mean, how much more blatant can you get in the orchestration of propaganda? Okay? The times of Israel goes and pays nine euros. How many shekels is that? Nine euros to get a photo and then they pay some idiot intern to go copy and paste rubber stamp marks on the photo. Now, what really happened at Disneyland? New information is leaking and conspiracy and government involvement in the Disneyland Falls flag has come to light. But basically what happened was that we were looking at an older document from the MMWR report, the more the weekly morbid report from 1989. And it was some recommendations that the ACIP had made on introducing a second dose of an MMR, which by the way, Barbara Lofisher was on that, was on that when the ACIP made a recommendation for a second MMR dose. So once they were talking about some, they didn't provide a footnote for where they got the information from. And basically what happened was we really got the idea to just type in certain keywords and find it. I'm like, oh, that's just brilliant. You know, I didn't even think about that. Grought us to a lot more information. And what happened was, is I came across some documents about the measles outbreak from 2015. It actually, the Disneyland measles outbreak started December, January, 2014, 2015. And basically what happened was, was that as I was reading these documents, I noticed that there was two different versions of the same document. One of them was released, the British Medical Journal, and one of them was released at another journal online. And so here is where it gets very, very suspicious. This document, the document was titled, I'll give you one second, and I'll tell you exactly what it is. Because I had to, I didn't have time to pull up my thing here, so I apologize about that. But anyways, the topic of the article was the effect of contact investigations and public health interventions to control and prevention of measles transmission, a simulation study. They basically collect every epidemiological data, and they have this system that they call RTI. And it's basically what it is, it's a disease prediction program. It basically, the whole purpose of it is to prepare for detecting and responding to disease threats. And that program is actually ran by the National Institute of Health for Medical Science. So when I was reading the document of the simulation study, I noticed in there that they were talking about the Disneyland Meavals, and how they were conducting contact investigations, and for those who are not familiar with contact investigations are, that's basically going to door to door or where the suspected cases were found. And they will basically question them on where they went, who they were with, where did they go within a certain periods of days and things like that. So this article spoke very adamantly about this outbreak. Now when it was first originally published in the British Medical Journal first, the simulation study that I speak of. And by the way, everything that I'm talking about right now will be given out in a document with all documents and pictures and everything for what I'm speaking of right now. When they did this study, when you scroll down, it said that simulation study that was talking about Disney and talking about contact investigations, it was originally published in November of 2014. So I was like, wait a minute, these little epidemic in Disneyland had not even happened yet, because the document that I'm speaking of was not even accepted until I think it was April of 2015 and then it was published online in May of 2015, which and there is no revision, which means that the document was written and not revised, which means that the document was written before the before the outbreak even occurred. And one of the co-authors that wrote this document was Kathleen Harrison, the State Department of Secretary of Health, and she was also an advisory committee on immunization practice. She not only did not disclose from the co-authors study that she did with the simulation study of a measles epidemic outbreak that she did not let the people know about the conflicts of interest, but they always tried to keep the document until after the measles outbreak happened to make it look like the document was written after that had happened, which was totally false, because the document had been written some time before November, before they even got it in there. And I will tell you why. Kathleen Harrison had gotten a grant from the National Institute of Health, along with her other co-authors, to conduct a modeling contract. So basically, when you have a grant that is zero, you zero one, when you go and look up the search results on the National Institute of Health website, you go to their codes. And it specifically says it's a category of cooperative agreements, then to support a discrete specified circumscribed project to be performed by the name investigations in an area representing his or her special interest in competes. Now the reason why the National Institute of Health had given this document, this grant was because for one, there was no limit on funding. And for two, they did that to try and make the researcher an intermediary to make it look like their funds were not influencing the study. When you look at the study simulation, it says right in there that this document does not have any conflicts of interest, and that all the data that was provided to them was the author and not the person who granted the award. So it was not an independent study with no conflicts of interest. Because Kathleen Harrison did not list her involvement with the ACIP, nor did she even say that a federal grant was used to, here is where it gets very interesting, because the grant that helped make that simulation study that the federal government gave during the outbreak, Kathleen Harrison, the same person, she offered a document called the 2014-15 needle outbreak, it's a small world after all. And when you go down to her page, she basically said that the outbreak in the Disneyland, this is coming from her own document that she wrote, the needle outbreak, it's a small world after all. She made a comment on her document that specifically said, and I quote, this outbreak captured the attention of the public. Outbreak started in Disneyland, the happiest place on earth had all the elements of a good news story. People viewed as wealthy and entitled, and were seen as the cause of the outbreak, and appeared to wake the sleeping giant, majority of populations who vaccinate their children. The outbreak advanced the national conversion about immunization led to state initiatives to limit or eliminate personal belief exemptions to school immunization requirements. And then she went on to say that were any beliefs changed? And if she don't evidence suggests that it is unlikely that people will strongly help belief, change them as a result of this outbreak. Need more discussion about natural immunity and risk, and that the parents who are on the fence may have been influenced. The next page, she used his articles from the media that were attacking unvaccinated populations. And the media was saying that the parents who oppose measles vaccines hold firm with their beliefs despite the outbreak. And everything that was written in Kathleen Harrison's document, it's a small world after all, all the procedures, what they were going to do for that outbreak in Disneyland, which was written in November 1st of 2014. It was already written. And therefore, it was already planned. The entire measles Disneyland was nothing but a total fraud and a sham to get people or to get the state legislators to force removing religious exemptions. Not only is this study used against the people, but it was also co-authored by a state health department employee, Katherine Harrison, and she also was on the advisory committee of immunization practices, and she influenced the government to pass it by doing that. So what she did was absolutely unconstitutional. Not only were federal funds used to do a false flag attack to make it look like there wasn't an outbreak there, but she also did not disclose her involvement with the ACIP. So she had two conflicts of interest in this and never disclosed them. I'm scared to that, which is why I didn't vaccinate her in the first place, and which led me to read about the warnings that are out there. What I've learned are there warnings about introducing these alien microorganisms into our children's blood and the long-term effects, which could be trivial or they could be quite hazardous and they could be just allergies or asthma or sleep disorders, or they could be cancer, leukemia, both with sclerosis, sudden infant death syndrome. It's very scary and it's very serious, and I think because I felt wrong doing it, that's why I didn't do it. And we have to think twice, why are our children getting these diseases? What is the biochemical legacy of the vaccination? How long is it last and what might it be? It's the effect, yeah. You're putting something into your baby's bloodstream. Okay, everybody ought to think about that. Everybody ought to think about that.