Fred Corbin Explains Graphene Oxide

Video Transcript:

The name is Fred Corbin. I am a professional race car engineer. I have a background in nuclear biological and chemical weapons study. I also have civil engineering, aerospace engineering, marine biology has correlated subjects of such study. I've came here this afternoon not only to represent the people of Barbados, but to bring a certain educational perspective to what? A tremendous amount of people have been asking me with the kind of background that I have in understanding what is actually going on. So I have one question which I don't want to respond to. I don't really need a response to the question. And then I have a series of points I would like to back up that question with. And I'd like to address this question directly to the Chief Medical Officer and to my lady over there in the corner. I'd like to ask the Chief Medical Officer please to provide evidence for the public education. That describes the isolation of a SARS-CoV-2 virus directly from a sample taken from a deceased patient where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material. IE Monkey Kidney cells, aka Virocells, liver cancer cells. Sir, before the CMO continues, I must remind you that you have to maintain a brief period of time for your presentation. We have many persons who still with the action. I understand that, but you also have to realize I am educating a lot of other people who are listening for this. I appreciate your suggestion. We appreciate that as well. That leads me to my next point. Sir, we haven't heard from the CMOs, I believe. Oh, he's a piece of... So I am not... I'm really not clear, so... So you got it? I just slowed down. That's okay. That's no problem at all. I'll just move on. I've got limited time. No problem. So... Addressing the situation where a lot of people believe that the SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2 is a subclave of the beta coronavirus family. And how do we know this? Simply because we did cross-referencing by the International Taxometer Reviews and then correlated those with actual genetic sequences and reviewed them against the patent records that were available and it is apparent that the declaration of a novel coronavirus is a fallacy. There are several coronavirus sequences that have been uploaded, but there was not one single identified novel coronavirus, not at all, for their more. Patents on coronavirus sequences were sought as early as 1999. Up until 1999, patenting of coronavirus sequencing was uniquely isolated to veterinary science. First vaccine patent for coronavirus was sought by Pfizer and more specifically, the patenting of the S spike protein, the same thing we have allegedly only just discovered. The first patent application was filed January 28, 2000, 21 years ago. There is nothing new about this and in support of that, we have this document. This is the evidence supporting that. This is the evidence which shows that there is no... that SARS is no naturally evolved virus. It's not a naturally evolved virus. No one has ever produced is safe and effective vaccine against a coronavirus. It has never been done and it never will be done simply because it's not possible. Therefore, I go on and I record the core receptor dependent phasor-sytic general method of action for those who don't understand that. Okay, this is science talk. Okay, I'm following the science notes. So bear with me. General method of action for infectivity and pathogeneticity. In other words, this is what makes it so deadly. Okay, our SARS-CoV-2 appears to be specifically related to cumulative charge resulting from inserts placed on the surface of the spike receptor binding domain. What does that tell you? This is a lab engineer phenomenon. And how do we know that? We can back up that simply because we have a document produced and very kindly submitted to us by our friends in the CCP Intelligence Service who gave us this document where it says two mutations were critical for back-to-human transmission of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. This is where AstraZeneca and some of the other vaccine manufacturers get their vector from. It's just that there's one small problem. Is that an outlines direct collusion between the Communist Chinese Party and who those who were building it? We recognize each KU for spike aiming to build its capacity to mediate viral entry into human cells. To this end, we introduce two single mutations. We introduce two single mutations. Not the we. S76R and S768 into HKU for spike. The S76R mutation was expected to restore the HPC multid. I go on a quote further. We produced retroviruses, pseudo-type with HKU for spike referred to as HKU for pseudo viruses in human cells. Sir, I think I've given you a fair amount of time. No, I am not sure. Sir, Mr Corbin. I'm addressing the Corbin. I'm addressing the doctor over here. Allow me to share with you one point. Yeah. We need you as this is a town hall meeting where everyone wishes to participate. I understand. To come to a point where you give us a suggestion and idea or a proper question. I just want to address the doctor in the corner. What? Thank you, Mr Corbin. Thank you, Madam Braman. I appreciate your help. I just want to address my lady doctor in the corner. We're going to have a drink over this, by the way. When I challenged you with regard to your ingredients of the Pfizer vaccine, I had good reason to do so because I hold in my hands an internal document from Pfizer laboratories, which was given to us by a very special person who we have a contact with. Called Reverse Engineering, the source code of the biotech Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. This is very, very critical because it outlines the chemical and the biological processes, which were very, very carefully manipulated in order to be able to produce an mRNA that also contain a very, very dangerous toxin to the human body. Do you want to know what a toxin is? That toxin is called graphene oxide. Every single one of these vaccines in the 30-gram shot contains 15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier particles within the mRNA sequence. 15 billion nanoparticles. Let me tell you how graphene oxide works when it gets into the body. Because when the spike protein binds itself to our blood cells and so on, graphene oxide then starts to build a structure. This is why we have people with blood clots, and we have people with heart failure, sudden heart failure and so on, because we have the carbon-obstructuring. Mr. Corbin, again, Mr. Corbin, you're lecturing at the moment. You are, Mr. Corbin. And we have... Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Corbin, we have... ...to make your presentation. We have to give others a similar opportunity. And therefore, I have to ask you to please make a point, make, provide a question, or we will have to cut your microphone. We will have to cut your microphone. We will have to cut your microphone. We will have to cut your microphone. We will have to cut your microphone. Okay. One last question. As much as you have support in the audience, we have a number of persons who need to be heard as well. This is your final opportunity, Mr. Corbin. I appreciate that, sir. Thank you, Madam Prime Minister. I just want to make sure that everybody understands that Barbados is actually a signatory to the Convention on the Prohibition and Development of Production and the Stockpile and the Bacterialogical and Toxin Weapons. And we signed that treaty on the 16th of July 1976. However, the patent databases that we have accessed proves that COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines are in fact a bioeapon. And how do we support that? Because we have a copy of the mysteriously deleted Wuhan databases that tell us everything. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Mr. Barbados. Thank you, Mr. Corbin. We will now be going to the online