NASA FAKE - TOP 10 Reasons Why I Don-t Trust NASA

Video Transcript:

Look at this. Look at this. People actually believe. The deer is a car floating around up in space. Well, I think it looks so ridiculous and impossible. And you can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly. We're not way better CGI than we should be. Here. This is live on the air, okay? I'm going to zoom in on the earth in Photoshop. You see there is, okay, I'm going to go to image adjust levels and I'm going to bring the levels up. Uh oh. What is that? Why is your square box around the earth? It is Photoshop, but it's it's pastive. It is Photoshop, but it's it's pastive. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth. Like truth. That you are a slave now. Like everyone else you were born and deboned that you were born into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch. A prison for you or mine. So let's use this model of the earth. And this is the part of the front. Next segment, I'm going to show you how NASA grips objects in 3D space, rotates them around, manipulates them, they can do this with water, with cloth, anything. And the cool thing about it is we can take what they're doing, what they're seeing with their contact virtual reality augmented lenses and put that on a separate video layer live. Okay, I have a lot of temp peak strokes, but this one here, the system glitches, the software does not track this hand properly. And temp slips his hand underneath his other fingers, which is tightly only hot at the night which is impossible. You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly. We're not way better CGI if it was fake. Just another example of NASA faking space. Take a look here at this supposed image of Jupiter, nothing more than CGI fakery, the opposite auroras. Again, NASA's official website where it states how it captures vivid auroras in Jupiter's atmosphere. Here's the problem, the date of June 30, 2016. Take a look at this, another so-called official image of Jupiter. This one's from back in 2014. You see the problem here? Let's take a closer look at the supposed two images provided from NASA of Jupiter. All the collage in the same exact position. Here's a side by side. People can't see what's taking place here with NASA. Nothing more than fake reading. Give me a break. This is a complete insult. You have a brain in your head. It looks like you're in a studio, maybe in Omaha, Nebraska. The shot is so clear. Isn't it the Hulk? Are you really in space, though? I don't know. We're going to have to do something for you. I want to do it right now. Oh yeah, I can do that. Watch this. Is this the Hulk? Are you really in space, though? Uh-huh. This is the whole, are you really in space Phil? Do the hair? Do the hair? And they just start making stuff up. Like that Neil Armstrong guy. Have you seen him on the talk shows? Neil, I'm giving the first man a walk in the moon. Talk about a fish story. Yeah. Man, and they're buying it. Oh yeah. Yeah. So many times during space walks outside the international space station, we can see air bubbles rising up. Can you touch on how there are air bubbles in space? Can you be more specific air bubbles? So yeah, like a lot of times during the footage, the NASA footage, you can see bubbles coming up out of that helmet. So kind of from underneath you. How do you explain bubbles in space? Yeah, I'm not sure exactly where you're trying to go. Now there's some kind of water in that helmet. And it comes with a teeter, a teeter from sweat or from the cooling garments. And that's generally what that is. I've never seen any kind of air bubbles anywhere. Could it be that you're filming in another water pool and you're not really out there? Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know you can't explain, but you feel it. You felt it your entire life. But there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is, but it's there like a splinter in your mind driving a bad. You're a coward and a liar and a... In 1906, the shuttle Challenger exploded about 74 seconds after taking, killing all seven astronauts inside. Or did it? It turns out that six of the seven are still alive and keeping it to die. Alison on his hook up claims to be his identical twin brother Claude. Yeah, I've got an identical twin brother Claude, too. The Challenger pilot Mickey Smith has neither bothered changing his name. He's now Professor Michael J. Smith of University of Wisconsin. Now, Kristen McCall with, who's a bit of a sneaky man, she was the Challenger Playload specialist, quite famous for being a teacher. It turns out during her astral day, she was using her middle name, Krista. And now, what she goes by her first name, Sharon. The Challenger Commander, Francis Richard Scoby, is now Dick Scoby, which sounds like a rather unpleasant disease. Judith Fresnick, the Challenger Mission Specialist, again, has an in-bothered changing her name. She's a Professor at Yale Law. And finally Ronald McNair, another Challenger Mission Specialist, claims to be his identical twin brother, Colin McNair, what are the odds? So there was just my own business looking at Google Earth, and this big snow-covered monstrosity is staring me in the face like, um, why is that cover in the snow? So I keep digging a little bit deeper. And I finally get underneath this cloud cover here, and a few images pop up. And I sell images, what are they? Well, this we got, which I'm sure that looks familiar to you right. Looks just like the pictures they give us some marks. So I'm just kind of creeping around here, and definitely noticing the same kind of undulation changes, and same kind of rocks, same kind of dirt. The only thing that's missing is that nice little red tint that they pay somebody $150,000 a year to put on there. So I'll keep kind of going through here and see if it... What the... Uhhh... Yeah, so, look, I have another truck. Yeah, this is NASA, what's that say? Mars project? I think I found out where Mars is, guys. At some point in the future, we're going to look back and say, how did we do it without space? The kinds of technologies that we're testing out on space station are definitely helping us with our goals of going beyond low-ratherbit. Early in the next decade, a set of crude flights will test and prove the systems required for exploration beyond low-ratherbit. Right now, we only can fly an Earth orbit. That's the part that we can go. And this new system that we're building is going to allow us to go beyond and hopefully take humans into the solar system to explore. We get further away from Earth. We'll pass through the Van Allen belt, an area of dangerous radiation. We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space. We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space. There's a small problem with going to the moon. Inch by inch, NASA is leaking out that they know that there's a problem there. It's called the Van Allen belt, high radiation belts of charged particles around Earth. And we don't know how to get through them, they say. Well, isn't that interesting because they're sure didn't seem to be a problem back in 1969? The moon landing stopped in 1972 and we haven't been back. We haven't been beyond the Van Allen belt. NASA admitted that it had lost, lost the original footage of man's first steps on the moon. The YouTube and watch a funny thing happen on the way to the moon. It contains newly discovered evidence, which is part of the missing tapes. Of outtakes when the first mission to the moon of them falsifying a shot of being halfway to the moon. For NASA to come out and say that all the tapes are erased, I mean, you must, it's incredible. However, this isn't just one tape. This is rooms of tape labeled Apollo 11 moon landing. Someone had to physically go and erase it. It's very challenging to try to prove we landed on the moon and it shouldn't be challenging. The tape should be there, there should be plenty of evidence. I mean, it's proof right there. This is an official massive photo of the first Apollo 11 lunar module. The landing on the moon, I mean, it's right there. It's proof that it's a picture right there. It's landing on the moon. But the only thing I have with this picture is that it's taken from the moon. Yeah, I know. People who believe they saw the landing on the moon because they heard it on the radio. The moon is the first time I've ever seen a moon landing on the moon. I mean, it's the first time I've ever seen a moon landing on the moon. I mean, it's the first time I've ever seen a moon landing on the moon. I mean, it's the first time I've ever seen a moon landing on the moon. I mean, it's the first time I've ever seen a moon landing on the moon. There's a picture of the insect actually being deployed from the spacecraft. Did you see it in the background? There was a guy in the background, man. I'm not kidding you. You can't deny that that's someone in the background. The guy moving in the background. Then I'll tell you just if nothing else, here's why you can tell they're not fake. Just to create the paperwork, that amount of paperwork would make faking it prohibitively expensive. No one could afford to generate that much documentation. All of that happened at a little town called York, Maine across the United States from where we're talking to you right now. My research of the last year has led me to the conclusion that not even low earth or bit is possible, that the International Space Station is a hoax and all man space travel is fake. First though, let's have a look at the International Space Station. I want to talk about some of the anomalies I see there. For the inside of the International Space Station, there are a couple of zero gravity tricks that they use to fake it. The first is they have a complete mock-up of the International Space Station built on the inside of an airplane. That airplane does a bunch of risers and falls. It does upside down parabolic trajectory. That simulates zero gravity. The other main way they simulate zero gravity is with suspension in front of a blue screen. They use that trick for extended periods of time for longer than 45 second segments. But they can't move around as much. They can't do the acrobatic flips and rolls in the extended mode. There's full motion mode where they can fully move around and that's fact in plane. Then there's suspended or extended mode where they're suspended by wires in front of a blue screen. They can't move around as much but they can make the scene last for a longer period of time. The extended mode is much quieter than the full motion mode. In full motion mode, you can actually hear the sound of the jet engines, engines of the airplane. In every single scene of full motion mode in every segment of the International Space Station, you can hear this loud sound. The sound of jet engines, you could argue that it's the conditioning system. So you can take it out. Not even an officer conditioner is that loud. And why is there a loud sound in every segment of the International Space Station? The storm storm sparked several ABC digital. One, giving the opportunity to swear on the Bible that you walked down the moon. Will you put your left hand on the Bible and swear to God that you walked down the moon? You have $5,000 cash. You can give it to charity if you swear on the Bible that you walked down the moon. I have a tape. It's a big one. Why don't you swear to God? Why not? Why won't you do it? The Earth, supposedly 23.4 degrees on this axis. That means of course the Ecclotic Navar, again 66.6 degrees off. Well, Earth is supposedly orbiting on the sun at 66,600 miles an hour. The Earth is a huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, huge