Advertisement
Key Players Part 2
Part 2 of ’What Really Happened In New Palace Yard? (Too-Biased - The Not So Humble Hero)
- Category: Conspiracies / A secret plan ,Key Player, London Westminster attack2017,State-sponsored terrorism
- Duration: 55:42
- Date: 2020-10-27 19:30:35
- Tags: 322, terror attack, false flag, mi5
3 Comments
Video Transcript:
The police officer who lost his life in the line of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of course the force wanting to pay tribute to him for his sacrifice. For his sacrifice. The police officer who lost his life in the line of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father as described by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner and of duty today, a husband and father were perfectly privileged, and of duties the Hospital Police and response engaged to be masala with the Assistant Deputy because he was given a husband and father Where the incident was, defending us, and that's what their job was, and huge, and huge, and huge respect to all police officers up down the coast. They don't know how their day is going to unfold, and they go to work and they just get on with it. This life goes on. The next day Parliament did sit. We work and stop. And likewise, these activities, these terrorist attacks take place designing to try to rip our communities apart, and they do the opposite. They make us stronger. They make us more determined to say we're going to stand up to this sort of thing in the future. It was bizarre, though, in the sense that we hoped thought believed was a one-off. It was the beginning of a series of terrorist attacks that it's now sort of extraordinary to look back on. Because a few weeks later there was the attack on Manchester Arena at the Ariana Grande concert, then there was the attack at London Bridge, and then there was the attack at Finns Repark. And like that, he's gone. Are we safer now? I mean, a year's reflection is there were more terrorist attacks as we know, Grand Phil and so forth. There were more terrorist attacks as we know, Grand Phil and so forth. I think, well, go back to when I first was made aware of terrorism as such with the loss of my brother in 2002. Go back to when I first was made aware of terrorism as such with the loss of my brother in 2002. That was a long time ago. 15 years ago and today these attacks are still taking place. And so when, if you ask that question, The lies we're inflicted with in the 21st century, the war on terror to me is the ultimate one. How can you have a war on terror? What are you talking about? This doesn't even make sense. When's this going to end? When they've got the terror? Relax, it's all gone. We're moving on to horror next. This is insanity. You can't have a war on terror. You're having a war on terror, are you? That's right. What does war create? Terror. Exactly. So you're having a war against the consequence of the actions you're involved in. Good night. Elses, good terror. It's good peace, freedom, loving terror. You know that's. We're at a pivotal moment that we're heading towards. Do you just look after ourselves and defend ourselves? Or do we go and see where things are going wrong? Because Al-Shabaab or Baka Haram or Al-Nusra or Al-Qaeda, all these flourish where there isn't any governance. If you just look at the last few years, British policy, what Britain and his allies have done to Libya, to Syria, have turned these places into havens for death squads and militias that are terrorizing the entire region. Think of the millions of people that have been traumatized as a result of Britain's actions in Libya, turning a prosperous state, the most prosperous and advanced and with the highest living standards in all of Africa, turning that state into a failed state that's a haven for militias, opening up its arsenal to all the death squads and militias of the whole region to terrorize the people of not only Libya, but Algeria, Cameroon, Nigeria, Tunisia, Egypt, the millions of traumatized people as a result of just this one act of aggression by Britain and we know Britain routinely dishes out this kind of aggression. We're sitting down with Michael Schoier, the man who had served in the CIA for more than 20 years, up until 2004. At one time he was the chief of the CIA bin Laden unit. Then he went and exposed how counter-effective Washington's methods were in the fight against terror. I'm very pleased to have the chance to interview you, Mr. Schoier. I'm glad to be here. Bin Laden is gone. Who is Washington's number one enemy now? Washington's enemy is an enemy that doesn't exist. We're fighting an Islamic enemy that Washington believes is out to kill us because we have elections, because we're free, because we have women in the workplace. It's an enemy that doesn't exist. It didn't exist when Bin Laden was alive. It doesn't exist now. I'm a minister in the foreign office and I spend much of my time looking after the Middle East and Africa and there are one of the major challenges we have is dealing with extremism, is dealing with poised inside ideology of the religion of Islam being hijacked and extremists providing a promise to youngsters who don't really understand the religion and offering them a fast track to paradise if they conduct themselves in an extreme way that we see. America is being attacked because of its foreign policy in the Muslim world, because of its support for Israel, because of its support for the Saudi police state, because of its presence on the Arab Peninsula. And until we accept that, until Americans can say to each other, whether you support aid to Israel or not, our relationship with Israel is causing this war, we are not going to be able to defeat this enemy. How many times have we heard Mr. Clinton, Mr. Bush, Mr. Obama say, this has nothing to do with religion, this is not a religious war, this is a bunch of people who are just madmen, we are definitely fighting a religious war. And until we come to realize that, we are never going to be able to defeat it. In fact, we're encouraging the growth of a new generation of people who are going to fight us. And I work very hard with our international allies on trying to understand this new threat, this asymmetric warfare that we see. And that's all usually a long way away. And so when this thing happened in Westminster, it was just a reminder of how much work we have to do across the peace and challenging this, what I believe is probably the mysterious threat in the 21st century. The U.S. pulls out out of everywhere. Yes. Is it going to be the end of terrorism? It certainly would deny the terrorists the glue of unity. So as long as we're side by side with the Saudis and with the Israelis, we're stuck in the Middle East and America will continue to bleed. And recognize that unless we do state step forward, then these will become norms, the interference in elections, the interference in cyber attacks and so forth, the conduct of war is changing around us. And further attacks in the UK could very well be inevitable. The common perception, the notion I had when I was in high school, was that the Viet Cong terrorized the Vietnamese population, forced them to fight against the Americans on the pain of death. What I began to understand in Vietnam was that they didn't need to do things like that. All they had to do was let a Marine patrol go through a village. And whatever was left of that village, they had all the recruits that they needed. I began to understand why the Vietnamese didn't greet me with open arms, why they in fact hated me. And of course that didn't change the fact that my friends were getting killed and injured every day, and the only place that you could focus your own anger and fear was on those civilians who were there. So it was this self-prepetuating mechanism, the longer that we stayed in Vietnam, the more Viet Cong there were, because we created them, we produced them. We are going through a very dangerous and volatile period, and there is a big question for us when I think the nation has always become a little, risk of worse, is to what nations do stand up to resurgent nations doing their own thing, to extremists, to non-state actors. And I think that's... We have a series of services. But let's not also forget, Joe Cox was killed by an extremist too, and her plaque is actually inside the chamber itself that we all look at. So we're very conscious that we live in a very dangerous world, and it is up to us to work out what the strategy is, what is our posture that we're going to hold in order to be the exemplar, to stand up for the values that we've spent decades in millennia actually developing. That's what we need to remember, is not be defeated by these terrorists, but be positive and move forward, and that's the message that I told my son. I found him at the top of the stairs, he was refusing to go to bed, it was very late, and he wanted answers. He couldn't understand firstly why somebody had done something as terrible as this. And then he was also puzzled as to why I stepped forward into danger, as to why I stepped forward into danger to want to help, and all I could suggest was that there are some very bad people in this world, but there are some good people. And the good people do have a number of bad people, and we must stand up to these things. I know you have children yourself, and sometimes it's when you have to describe something that's happened to you, or an experience, when you have to describe it to someone else or to your children, that can be almost one of the hardest things, can't it, in terms of trying to explain something. How was that process for you? How have you tried to rationalize that, or explain it to your children? The other reflection and vivid image I have is returning home after what had happened, and finding my son on the top of the stairs, and he was in tears, and he was just on his own. And I sat next to him, and he just asked why, and I just said, he can understand why I stepped forward, why somebody had been killed, why somebody was yielding a knife, and a place that he had visited many times. And all I could offer was that there are some bad people in the world, that there are not more good people, and it's the good people that win. Mr. Alwater, I really appreciate you speaking to us this morning. I realize that this is very raw emotion still, and we very much appreciate you sharing some of that with us, and clearly it will be hugely important day of Westminster today. So thank you for your time this morning. Just to say that the work that you do is so important, and that was reflected in the day in March 23rd of this year, in March 23rd of this year. I very recall that day very vividly. It haunts me, it stays with me in March 23rd of this year. What I reflect on that day is actually what happened after that. I got home at about 10 o'clock in the evening, and I have a little boy. I have a little boy called Alex, and he was at the top of the stairs. He came in and heard the doors, and there was 10 o'clock in the evening, and he didn't want to go to bed. He just wanted to make sure I was okay. Majority, we have two and a half million veterans in Britain. Majority make the transition into civilian life without a problem, but some do need support because of the horrific things that they actually seem. And it does remind me that I need to be conscious that I need to be aware of what I will list as well. Have you sought any help personally? Is that a conscious decision that you've taken? It's probably very typical of a man at Alex Army, and soon the reserve is so, but I'm conscious that I should be aware of it. Absolutely. Alex Army, and soon the reserve is so, but I'm conscious that I should be aware of it. And he asked this question. He said, why, Daddy, why did this happen? And I struggled with an answer. I just, all I could come up with is that there are some very bad people in this world, but there are more good people. And it's the good people that step forward. And I was fortunate that with my background and so forth, I was one of many. Many on that day that did step forward. First of all, just to explain to us, why were you at Westminster yesterday? We were part of British Line Heart Boxing Team who I followed to take on Tally and Thunder tonight at York Hall. I was actually in Westminster for a meeting with some politicians about boxing. What we normally do is we've gone to a community activity PR event, which was taken place for an hour in the House of Commons. Using boxing to engage young men, this meeting had finished and we'd left as with an athlete called John McAvoy. And I was really happy to be here today. I was really happy to be here today. I was really happy to be here today. I was really happy to be here today. I was really happy to be here today. I was really happy to be here today. I was really happy to be here today. I was really happy to be here today. I was really happy to be here today. We walked into a new palace yard, which is the courtyard. And as we walked into the courtyard, the altercation occurred. So we were about 90 seconds into it. Another colleague, sorry, not a colleague, another guy called Mike, came and joined in. Also noticed that another civilian in a tracksuit at the time moved towards the casualty of the PC on the floor. And then we commenced first aid. The first aid was staffed on Davies who was actually one of my instructors at Sandtest, where I did my training when I joined the Army nine years ago. Phoebe boxing coach Tony Davis was leaving an event in the commons when the attacker struck. He told me today his former Army training kicked in, but so did a memory of Gunner Lee Rigby, murdered with a terrorist sword. The first aid was a terrorist sword. The first aid was a terrorist sword. The first aid was a terrorist sword. The first aid was a terrorist sword. The first aid was a terrorist sword. We were part of British Line Heart boxing team. So I was actually in Westminster for a meeting with some politicians about boxing. Earlier later I realised that the man at the tracksuit was staffed on Davies who was actually one of my instructors at Sandtest. Thank you. Please, I'm not brave. You were there, you didn't run away. I wouldn't accept the tag of hero again. PC power is the hero. There are some very bad people in this world, but there are more good people. And it's the good people that stepped forward. I was one of many on that day that did step forward and stood up to the terrorism and stood up to the terrorism. Please, I'm not brave. No, you were there. And the horribleness that we saw in true-dialives that day. How did your mother cope known that she had lost a son to terrorism and then learning that another son was caught up in a terrorist attack? She wasn't surprised that of the actions of the day. I wouldn't accept the tag of hero again, I think. And it's an honor to receive this award this evening and to be with others that step forward in your works of life to try and make our world a better place. I reacted in the way that I thought appropriate and I was one of many that stepped forward to do what we thought was right. I come from an army background. There is a fraternity there where we look after each other, where there is a sense of bond and understanding. I'm not brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough to be brave enough And I think what came home to me after the Westminster incident was just how close to knit your fraternities and just how as just mentioned in that clip there mentioned in that clip there. You don't know what's going on. You really don't. And yet every day you put your uniform on and you stand in harm's way so we can continue our work. And that for me really came home with all the messages of thanks that I got. All the messages of thanks that I got. From across Britain and indeed wider afield. I'm all saying I don't know who you are but it was one of us that you went to help and we very much appreciate that. And I'm just sorry I couldn't and those others with me couldn't do more to save Keith Palmer's life. He was also part of our community in Parliament as well. He had been working there many many years. He had been working there many many years. And day in, day out we saw him and he works with his other colleagues. We're all as one. MPs, journalists and celebrities are amongst those who've shared the video. Often with the faces of both boys clearly visible. The bully child said today he felt ashamed of being online. It seems even when people share a video in support the outcome may not be positive. The sharing is another form of abuse in the sense because it perpetuates the harm that was originally done to the child. And it makes it a permanent record of it and it makes many more people to have seen. And from the point of view of the aggression, the humiliation, the hurt, the problem is greatly perpetuated. Earlier I spoke to the Defence Minister to buy a cell word. He last night tweeted out the video writing absolute disgrace. The bully his parents, the school and the onlookers had big questions to answer and apologising to the Syrian refugees saying it's not the welcoming friendly Britain we're supposed to be. I spoke to him and I started by asking him why he felt the need to retweet the video. Like so many we were absolutely shocked by seeing these scenes and it raises big questions about understanding what our children, how are they growing up today, about the difference between good and bad. And societally, where we should be going. Big questions not just for all of us, for the school, for the parents, for our grandparents. And indeed, of course, for those who watch this event take place. And I worry that we are becoming a walk on by society where we're allowing space for these things to happen. We saw another event on the 17th of November where a female police officer was dragged across the ground. What did people do there? They laughed as they recorded it on social media. Cars drove by without stopping. That is absolutely wrong. It's that what I want to challenge. It's that what I want to change. Is that the right way to challenging? It's two children, one's 16, one's 15 and their faces are all over social media. You seem to be condoning this behaviour. This is absolutely wrong. I'm absolutely not condoning this behaviour. Headbutting. Somebody headbutting another child. Where does this individual bully get these ideas from? That is the question that we all need to pose ourselves. Let me explain. My little boy went to school at preschool. Day one, he came back with a black eye. Day one, he came back with a black eye. I want to ask him how did he get this? He said he stepped in to defend his friend who was beaten up by somebody else. My little boy went to school at preschool. My little boy went to school at preschool. Now I can't tell any parent what they should do with their children. I can't ask anybody what the conversations should be had. What I'm saying is that we should all ask ourselves. How is it that it's becoming the norm with social media? To record these things, find them funny and amusing and walk on by. That is the piece that I want to challenge. That's what I was seeking to do by putting it out on social media myself. Publishing this video in this unredacted form shows an appalling want of good judgement. I would also question the wisdom of showing the faces of miners in this form. I think that's the point, isn't it? They're both children. This is your reflection. The political correctness of where Britain, I fear, is heading towards. Let's get back and understand what our values are and defend them. Let's get back to being strong about what Britain should be. Let's get back to making sure that when kids grow up, they know the difference between good and bad. So this sort of thing doesn't happen. Thank you. You You're also right to say that I hope the majority of us do not participate in this behaviour. That's actually a given. The point there is. Please let me finish. If the majority of us walk on by, then we're actually ignoring the situation. We're ignoring the problem. We need to own this problem. We need to get in front of this and solve this. We can only do that if we move away from this walk on by society. Mr Speaker, as we speak, all doses are flattening the village of Canaanama and destroying its school, which was built with international debt and support, and which provides education to around 170 Bedwin children from five different communities. People who live in these villages threaten no one. Their crime is to have homes on land that Israel wants to expand the illegal settlements of Kufar Adamin and Marley Adamin. Speaking plainly, it is state-sponsored theft. More importantly, as the minister has said, the force will transfer the villages of Canaanama and Abounawa contravenes international humanitarian law. It is a war crime. What other country would dare to behave in this barbaric way? And will the government condemn these actions in the strongest possible turn? The reality that this forceful eviction and demolition, this breach of international law, this hammer blow to the two-state solution, is taking place as we sit here today. And we are all frankly tired of asking what can be done. This is the time for the United Kingdom to lead the major nations of the world in recognising the Palestinian state and to do so immediately, while there is still a state left to recognise. Mr. Erwood, you've been in the middle east lately. Thank you, Mr. Erwood. Nice to see you, sir. Any comments on this? In Britain. In the 25 years I have spent in the house and I suspect very much longer than that. No one can be the minister for the Middle East in Britain if they are not a member, preferably a leading one of either the Labour or Conservative friends of Israel. It's the fact that you have to be a friend of Israel to be the foreign office minister for the Middle East, which speaks volumes about the absolute unwillingness on the part of the British state, the British government, the British Parliament, to face up to its responsibility to the Palestinian people. It is the fact that in this building the entire tragedy of the Palestinian people was authored when our foreign minister, then Mr. Balfour, promised on behalf of one people, a second people, the land which belonged to a third people. At a time when we didn't even possess the land of Palestine even as an imperial possession, that is the original sin in Britain. All the blood that has flowed under the bridge since that declaration was made. And the fact that we don't recognize our special responsibility to the Palestinian people. On the contrary, you have to be a friend of Israel to be the minister for the Middle East. The Palestinian people as a result of that declaration by Mr. Balfour had their country wiped off the map. We hear a lot of talk in the Middle East about people threatening to wipe other people's countries off the map. The only country that has been wiped off the map in the Middle East is Palestine. Go to your Atlas Missbrook and you will see the Palestinian people were scattered to the four corners of the earth, stateless, paperless, passportless, hunted from pillar to post, regularly subject to massacre and attack of one kind or another. The only other responsibility for that originates here. Instead of recognizing that special responsibility, we do precisely the opposite. If you're not a known and celebrated supporter of the country which supplanted Palestine, drove the Palestinians out of their country into the four corners of the earth, then you have no chance to be the minister for the Middle East. I'm a minister in the foreign office and I spend much of my time looking after the Middle East and Africa. To the Middle East and Africa. Then to see PC Keith Palmer on the ground, losing a lot of blood with officers trying to help. I simply move forward to see what I could do. We had a pulse. I was trained as a medic and could I? Could I assist and they said tell us what to do? With all these situations, your training kicks in and... We did our best to try and stem the flow of bleeding and cut back the flag jackets and so forth. Call for help, get the medics in. The medics asked me to continue working and then... The helicopter arrived and the doctors turned up as well and I was expecting him to put in the helicopter and take it away but no you have to stabilize the body first. I know that you were a captain and I think the Royal Green Jackets which is where your medical training had come from. I was reading at the weekend that you still feel now you're on. You question whether or not there was anything more that you or others could have done but the answer is no, isn't it? The ambulance service has a very different legal duty of care than say the police or fire and rescue service. For the ambulance service, the duty of care towards a patient is an established professional duty. Unlike the police and fire and rescue service, this duty engages from the point at which the ambulance service accepts a 999 call. Ambulance service is the patient breathing. And this patient conscious. Okay, help us on its way. That duty is to provide a reasonable standard of care without unreasonable delay. To avoid liability, delays in accessing the patient and providing care need to be justified. I keep still but there is health on the way. The ambulance service is in a position where it has to justify its duty of care towards a patient at each step of the way. The primary duty of care for the police and the fire and rescue services is to the public at large. However, the law has different expectations of the ambulance service and this was set out in the key case of Kent vs Griffith in 2001. When I was reading at the weekend that you still feel now you're on, you question whether or not there was anything more that you or others could have done but the answer is no, isn't it? This is the defibrillator. It can save someone's life but only if you use it. A defibrillator is an easy to use device. You don't need any training to use it because it will tell you exactly what to do. Shock advised. Its job is to shop someone's heart back into a normal rhythm during cardiac arrest. However, it will only instruct you to deliver a shock if this is needed. When used with CPR, defibrillators give the best chance of survival. The doctor says that the patient is not a patient. The doctor says that the patient is not a patient. The doctor says that the patient is not a patient. The doctor says that the patient is not a patient. The doctor says that the patient is not a patient. The doctor says that the patient is not a patient. The doctor says that the patient is not a patient. The doctor says that the patient is not a patient. Very important. You What's the need of who?! approach and how to fix your shoulders? And it was very distraught then to find that much as everybody, everybody had worked so hard that we weren't able to keep them alive. There is that moment, isn't there, when someone has to call it? You don't want to hear that, do you just want to continue on for as long as you possibly can? Eventually, the doctor said, okay, I think we're just going to have to call it. And I remember looking at him and saying, you're going to have to tell me to stop, sir, I'm going to keep doing this. And he just said, so you've done your best. We've all done our best here. I call the time of death. As we were handed over to the air doctors, there wasn't anything that we could do apart from trying to keep his head stable, was they're carrying out, what I can only describe is open heart surgery, they're in it. And you know, I have not seen anything that graphic in my life. And it was at that point when the air doctor said, unfortunately, we've done all we can, we can't do anything more. That was it. It was out up to the deep moment of sadness. Couldn't do any more. You can do more to help him. According to Masonic Ritual, if you break your oaths, you will be murdered. That is the basic of the oath. Now, Mason's will say, well, it's a joke. We don't murder people anymore, well. Punishment has become more bizarre from having your throat slit to having your chest open, your perpendicularly and your light's thrown over your shoulder. And to having your chest open, perpendicularly and your light's thrown over your shoulder and buried in the sands. In fact, the Masonic oath guarantee is a gruesome death for those who reveal the secrets. I do promise and swear under no less penalty than to have my breast torn open. My heart and vital is taken from thence and exposed to rot on the Dung Hill. One of whom explained how the criminal could buy immunity to commit crime all over London. The phrase that he used, that the officer used, was I'll remember of a little firm within a firm, the implications of that, that there was a secret society, a tight knit group of police officers who dealt amongst themselves and who could guarantee immunity for criminals around the whole of the metropolitan area. That phrase gave a death and a ring to what was to become a major corruption scandal. The officer who talked of the firm in a firm was Freemason John Simons. When the story was published, he was charged with soliciting a £50 bribe and suspended. While not denying his part in the corruption of the time, he claims the actual charge was absurd. Faced with what he saw as a fit up, he sent word to the officers probing the allegations that if jailed, he would expose many other corrupt detectives. The chief investigator was a Freemason, superintendent Bill Moody, then head of London's obscene publication SWOT. I send a message to Moody through another Freemason saying that I wouldn't stand for the fit up. I knew what was going on. And unless he stopped doing what was doing, I entered the two expressions of everything. But I knew about the most rotten police corruption, Freemasonry, the civil and the corruption in self and the former forms world, which I knew about. In threatening to expose his brother, Mason's, Simon's was only too aware of the traditional punishment awaiting the sonic traitors, being cut in half. Pingle's sign is given by drawing the hand smartly across the body. The threat is perhaps symbolic. The police are not the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. They are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. It shows a career on a motorcycle entering the parliamentary estate, looking around for any police officers, but not initially. Funny. This is one of these colleagues who came to get their drugs and had to keep. That's when I've gone to see a key for coming to the stable for this help. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The police are the only ones who are in the police. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners. The kitchens and the cleaners.