surviving in the clown world

Video Transcript:

I'm fixing our hole while the rain gets in and stops my mind from wandering where it will go I'm feeling the cracks that ran through the door and kept my mind from wandering where it will go And it really doesn't matter, keep on rolling right where I belong and right where I belong See if it was right then, we didn't agree, remember when, once they were they don't get in my door I'm painting a roof in a colorful way and when my mind is wandering there I will go It really doesn't matter if I'm wrong then right where I belong and right where I belong See if it will run around, it won't even ever rise to be why I don't get passed by now I'm taking the time for a number of things that went to modern, yesterday and I still go It really doesn't matter if I'm wrong then right where I belong Fixing all while the rain gets in stops my mind from wandering where it will go And it really doesn't matter if I'm wrong then right where I belong Okay, we're back for episode 247, Joe, how you doing? Tim, I'm just fine and I'm feeling a lot better because Elon Musk, as I guess you're aware, has purchased Twitter the platform from which he will be able to defend free speech first amendment Now on the other side of the ring there's a challenger who's come forward, Nina Jankowicz, I'm sure you've been following her Yeah, that was, yeah, she's going to be the czar of the office of disinformation So there's no question but that Nina in Elon will be duking it out on the internet And I think we were looking for some very exciting struggles going forward, don't you? Yeah, so it's been interesting to see how this plays out with the reaction We've got an indication because two days after this announced acquisition by Elon Musk of Twitter Department of Homeland Security, I guess it was during a budget hearing announced that they were creating this special office for disinformation management Which is, they're going to manage disinformation, they're going to respond to it This sort of a reaction, you could say to this, which is kind of odd because all Elon is saying he wants to do is just do away with some of the censorship that Twitter is now imposing on his platform As you say, Elon Musk's a struck a deal this Monday, last Monday rather, divide Twitter for about $44 billion He's technically the world's richest man, I doubt that's really true He's taken over the influential social network, it's used by world leaders, celebrities, culture trendsetters, and the Huy Palloy We are politically correct as of now, Twitter agreed to sell to Mr. Musk for the price of $54.20 cents a share Which is a 38% premium over the company's share price this month He also, he was really, he was the company's largest shareholder It's the largest deal to take a company private Mr. Musk said he will, that's what he says he'll do to Twitter Free speech is the better I cover, fungching democracy in Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated Mr. Musk said in a statement out to the deal, Twitter has a tremendous potential, I look forward, has a tremendous potential I look forward to working with the company and the community of users to unlock it The deal which has been unanimously approved by Twitter's board is expected to close this year, subject to a vote of the Twitter shareholders and some regulatory approvals The agreement, caps what seemed to be a probable attempt by Mr. Musk to buy the social media company, meet the media raises questions about what he'll do with the platform and how his actions will affect online speech globally Oh, it's been particularly interesting to react to it of course, the histrionics we've seen mostly from the left The claiming that ironically I think the Washington Post had an editorial about a concern of a billionaire buying a media company Oh well It's quite a sin isn't it? So Twitter is a weird operation, I've been reading about some of its finances, it doesn't seem to make much sense It's sporadically profitable yet it's grown, the share price I think is, the former Mr. Musk bought the company was less than half than it was a few years ago I think it peaked at $71 a share and went down to like $20 a share shot up to $38 when he bought it Some people said some of the financing behind it, it's server capacity or what it used, it doesn't have to pay for it or subsidize it But it's probably getting some sort of funding from the deep state, intelligence agencies The most same way that Google was set up and Facebook was set up by the intelligence agencies to become the dominant platforms that they are So it's odd that if it's going private, it's interesting to see how they're going to react to it The question is how much latitude or freedom does Mr. Musk have to operate in the current environment? Are they getting a sit back and let it become a free speech platform or it's going to be platform for normy free speech Meaning that the 80% I think Mr. Musk said something about something that affect some of the 80% acceptable opinions out there So who's to say how much free speech will be tolerated on this platform? Nevertheless it did, the reaction was interesting because it showed, well, there are true colors, I guess you could say, about their attitudes towards free speech The reactions, there's one media professor who said it felt like being in Berlin in 1936 I guess somehow Elon Musk is Hitler right now Of course we've talked about Robert Reich statements about Elon Musk by creating a libertarian free speech environment Was satisfying every lustful desire of dictators dot history So here we go, so questions, yeah, how much, what's going to happen from here on in? It does raise questions about the first amendment and also free speech in general in America Yeah, technically we've had free speech, freedom of the press, but it's always been heavily regulated or controlled by special interests If not by the government from time to time, particularly in wartime So it'd be interesting to see where it goes from here It is indeed going to be interesting and I think it won't go anywhere As I see it Tim and you know that I am a skeptic I just see this as a fake dialectic, I see this as Trump versus Hillary And remember Anthony Wiener's flap top with the insurance file that was going to crack apart the satanic deep state And I think that I think that the one that I think everyone waited for a while then it just fizzled out I think the same thing will happen here, I think that there will be a battle over the first amendment And I think that Musk will do things that his opponent, this Nina Janko which individual will chase him for But I kind of agree with the comment that you made from the Jewish individual who was media-pundit saying this feels like being in Berlin in 1930 I would say that any legitimate move toward freedom of speech or the restoration of the first amendment The first thing it would be attacked by is the claim of anti-Semitism Because this is the unspeakable area that is deflected with the term antisemitism Which I am confident that Musk will not breach Other issues, cul-de-sacs will be used to distract people and to think that there is a legitimate struggle over the first amendment occurring But I think that if you look into Musk's background, you'll see it's Masonic, I think he comes from a Converso family in South Africa The tip off is his mother, his father is hard to research but his mother is just very vivid on the internet And she cannot be in a public gathering without flashing Masonic hand signs are wearing a baffinette crown or something I mean she is just a 100% Masonic kind of horror Babylon character, clown world really, not a serious individual but just a decoration of Masonry's power and in your face on the internet I will give you I will digress and say this is a rumor but it comes from a person who is a friend and a Jewish individual He said that Musk is in fact an Israeli citizen Now this is a rumor but I'm just passing it along because I know our audience is mature enough to not take rumors as anything other than that But I think that Musk who created the electric car, you talked about how the deep state had created Google and Facebook Well I think that Tesla is also a deep state corporation I don't think there's any way in the world that the car sales organically propelled the company to where it is now It's comparable to Amazon If you look at Tesla bringing the electric car forward with the purpose of having cars that can be traced Because that's the beauty of the electric cars they all have to get updated so they have to be online And that's the nature of the car And now Amazon, it will control in a post kind of consumer society world It will just be delivering all the good so that's another deep state kind of structured corporation And then the one you mentioned Facebook, Twitter and Google these are all for nudging You've heard of the psychological concept of nudging, it was developed by Tabestock They were created to push the consciousness of the citizen in the direction that they want They have algorithms which tell them that can determine the activity online What the individual who's there can be moved by and the big data can come forward with just the right stories Try to nudge them in the right direction I think the struggle between Musk and Janko which will be amusing because she is truly a fully developed character of the clown world Before we started recording I was mentioning that right now she's on TikTok and is getting a lot of publicity Because of a song she's saying which is a spoof of Mary Poppin's super-califragilistic expiallidosis And she's, she mocks sort of free speech And she's very good singer incidentally, nice voice, she seems to be classically trained But you know obviously it's kind of disheartening to see someone mock free speech in this way But nevertheless, you know, so she's on that However, this isn't I think the her song that is really kind of the idea of her personality That song it was a Christmas song which she sang in 2015 or 2016 Which she changed the lyrics as she did with the Mary Poppin song And in that song she sang Who do I have to f to become rich and famous and powerful? So this was a line that she, a refrain that she sang in an office party It wasn't you know she wasn't embarrassed or it wasn't you know some secret communication She was at an office party, she was filmed Very professional production in the film made suspicious to me but in any case So she's saying that song who do I have to f to become famous and powerful? Now she has virtually no CV I mean this woman has never written anything I mean she graduated from college, I think Georgetown But she went to work in the department of disinformation in the Ukraine What is this? Nothing came out of it There was nothing as far as anyone that I know has any sort of You know what did she do there? What are her technical qualifications? However now Tim she has kind of shown the world what she can do because she has a book which she has actually two books But her new book is out and it is called How to be a woman online Surviving abuse and harassment and how to fight back Okay, so this is this is the perspective of the manager of the office of disinformation and who will be battling in lawn Now amazingly there was a particular individual that she focuses on in the new book And it claims to have drawn on rigorous research into the treatment of Camilla Harris Now this is kind of ironic because if you go back to her first song about who do I have to f to become famous and powerful? You see well this could be the you know the slogan of Camilla Harris right because she's just famous here in California It's an open secret relationship with really brown was just pay for play and evidently there were others she was just that was just how she moved forward. Well anyway, so you can see there's a kind of clown world aspect to all this you know that you know she's going to be fighting you lawn He's really going to be fighting I think over pick you need issues called a sex it's not really going to go into any serious issues you know that could actually wake more people up to you know the deep states malevolence but What will you know happen is is a chapter in the clown world now you know just bear in mind that the clown words seems funny you know it's one one thing you can do is look at it and laugh but remember it's being presented You know with a very malevolent purpose which is just to keep us stoop to five way genocide is taking place right so you know yeah she's funny it's amusing and I think a lawn will be kind of funny in his role as the defender of the First Amendment but I think the purpose of all this is very very evil. Yeah now the yeah this off this new governmental agency which I guess the part of the almost security can just create new offices or boards I don't know if that's in there in their statutory authority but nevertheless this was revealed planned to create this office the disinformation governance board was announced by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas this past Wednesday he appeared before the House appropriations subcommittee to discuss the fiscal 2020 budget for the Department of Homeland Homeland Security. America said the disinformation governance board had recently created and will be led by undersecretary for policy rob silvers co chair with the principal deputy chair councilor Jennifer gas skill. Apparently yeah the goal is to bring resources of the DHS together to address this threat again of disinformation of course what they the obviously this is the issue of labeling what do they consider disinformation just I guess people with views or perspectives that differ from the official narratives or governmental statements or policies so obviously it's inherently problematic ever government agency you know act like so far described ministry of truth. Of course the next year Yankewex is a political hack so even as problematic as an all as a government mental agency or entity is like this this supposedly free country where we have the first amendment for free press and free expression she doesn't seem to have the temperament you want for a government like this she or softwares response for spreading much disinformation in the past she wrote off the 100 Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation. And she so and she's also was an advocate of pushing the rest of the thing so she herself as an innocent of spread she is herself as guilty of spreading disinformation against her as her attitude or her her idea of disinformation is I guess statements or information provided by people who oppose the agenda of the Biden administration. So we'll see how where this goes I've been Congress has to prove the funding it's interesting to do in this just ahead of the November 22 election 2022 elections which is the democrats are democrats are expected to take a beating. You know so again it's just something like this just obviously it's not the proper role the government any government agency to tell us what disinformation is and nor should they be engaged in censorship the Biden administration DHS should not involve any censorship or suppressing of information. You know obviously it's what you want is the marketplace of ideas and if you get out there it's strange enough that they think that the people of America people are smart enough to elect the government but they're not smart enough to judge what good and bad information is or determine what was true and false out there. So it's you know again it's it's to me it it it it it it it weeks of desperation and it just there's coming out and they're just admitting that they're going to engage in some sort of governmental approach or attempt to suppress information and censor information. So again it's one of these things where you know we'll see where it goes how far it goes where they actually get away with this I don't know if jank was going to stay around too long with these with these videos coming out it might just be too much of a political hot potato for the Biden administration going into the elections. No I disagree I think she's actually been selected because she is a clown. I think that this is her strong suit and I think that there'll be more songs coming forward. I think it's going you know I have said and I've maintained that you know they are when when they're conducting a genocide one way to deflect criticism of this is to make the government absurd clown like. Right because you're you can't how do you how can you possibly think someone who's so lightweight who sings Mary pop in songs you know is actually an overseer of genocide so this is really why the I think the must jank which dialectic is getting set up it's just as a an absurd distraction for the more important things which are which are being revealed. I mean the attorney Thomas Brent's brought data out this last week indicating that 54,000 people had died within 14 days of their their first job and he pointed out that none of them had ended up as vaccine injuries because the classifications of when the vaccine begins is 14 days following the second job. And now this was known certainly by by Pfizer in terms of the internal documents that Naomi wolf and the people that you know the war room banans war room are bringing out. So they were aware of this more over the government agencies have data they have you know mortality records and whatnot but they don't collate and this goes back to the you know the subject that we covered so long ago. With the Lazarus study which criticized CDC's handling of various right where they pointed out that all you have to do is just. Chart everything every medical event every vaccine every office does it everything which is in any way related to medical practice on American citizens should just be categorized in place in a computer then you don't have any question about what what the correlations are right they're just literally eros medical pulling out of information from the machine you can see what what exactly causes what. Because that was deflected and denied by the CDC this is like 11 years ago you know that there is malevolence there that the agency is operating to confuse the American public about the fatalities that are caused by vaccines and other American and other drugs so you know this is what is being deflected by the CDC. And then it's been deflected by the struggle that's going to be coming up between musk and jank which which I think is just. You know basically in fact it's kind of interesting me that Hunter Biden's laptop was one of the the things which has been suggested it could be a battle royal because. You know she had denied the existence of it now it turns out it is real evidently but for some reason just like with Anthony weeners laptop none of the rumored you know blockbuster information come out of it right nothing ever occurs and so I think that you could be going forward seeing some you know leaked information musk will it'll be salacious you know possibly pedophilic you know who knows. But musk will demand it comes out jank which will you know say it's disinformation there's a you know and this will be the dialectic we will focus on while people are still taking boosters now I'm going to say. That in fact the independent media can really claim victory here because the vaccine uptake through the boosters is just about none now I don't know if you've seen the latest statistics on this but for example Denmark is just simply they pulled the plug on the whole project the government doesn't even recommend anymore Poland sent back I think five 50 million doses. And this is happening everywhere and that no one is going in for the boosters because of skepticism about the CDC's claims so in the United States anyway so you know this is this is great it's a victory and the latest data point that I think is important was the Hartford group the insurance company. They brought out a statistical dump on there on the last quarter now this is important because it's when Edward Dowd brought out the first insurance dump it was from the prior quarter this is this is a more recent one and it also shows 25% beyond baseline in terms of mortality it is in the young not the old it's something that is in the first place. It's something that is impossible to have occurred as it's only so it's a very clear signal and he also points out that covered this and he said that the there is a long term effects now which are also starting to play the insurance company and this is going to be everywhere because there's all these people who are damaged and can't work and they're going to be filing for claims and that this is really going to put a weight on the insurance companies and hopefully. The insurance companies will you know in an effort to stay in existence will bring out this data will demand the government come clean and this will you know be a very valuable piece of information for the resistance going forward. Yeah, then again all that you said regarding vaccines and the damage caused will be a label disinformation by Yankewicz's office. Yeah, yeah, yeah, the I mean yeah, all the whole idea of centering the internet right the whole idea of of curating and moderating content to protect the public from scary ideas or bad thoughts whatever the initial explanation for mass internet censorship was that people were you know we're not being nice to each other we're hurting each other's feelings particularly protected groups. You know women as mishankers women are protected group I guess are very fragile they need special protection means you've been struck to protect themselves on violence on internet on the words of violence I guess but nevertheless. The you we saw a spade of people being banned like maybe four or five years ago for ledgy hurting the feelings of I get you know I guess protected minorities I think it was shotsville. After search the shotsville riot that the government there are a lot of what happened or fermented you had the websites like the daily storm or a band I gave in lost then band off the internet. Alex Jones was banned I think the year two later from YouTube and Facebook for saying things about Sandhark parents he was sued I guess he's lost lost he's been a judgment against him he's I guess he's appealing whenever and you know he was also kicked off Twitter for I guess hurting the feelings of journalists. We heard a lot about internet safety is was then sort of introduced as a. As justification on in Silicon Valley that's big corporations started using safety as an excuse for for moderating content censoring and. This was I guess very similar like the safe space that you see on colleges and here various human resource departments use just for occasion for it basically could be triggered or hard. And by words or ideas of course that was just an excuse now the if you look at it at such a they just they didn't want they don't want to contend with the argument their fragile world view their arguments are they're controlled in a narrative could not. Key can be maintained in the front of constant you know I guess challenges from the millions of people on the internet but when you talk about censorship the actual I guess power behind censorship well was um well the Jews. The anti defamation league you know ADL was going around threatening companies with defamation you know they've been doing that for years and they created this council called hate speech so this group of. Basically they were worried because there was a lot of criticism about certain historical narratives and Jewish organizations and they what they started to do was they didn't know it's very. The situation for Jews to claim that they're there they're vulnerable when they're very powerful so they started demanding protection from other groups serve as a cover like women people of color gaze whatever you know these are sort of a cover. For them to again shut down the internet to stifle free speech and so what what happened was ADS successfully was able to install I guess content commas are at at Facebook and at Google. To control you know to control the content and censor everything that's that's when you. The boom is loaded YouTube and at Google Google bought YouTube and they lowered the boom on it the same thing at Facebook I think there was I think. The idea went after first runs of Facebook for allowing like. Holocaust denial or revisionism discussions on on their on their platform. So that that they were you know again they were the big force behind the censorship in these on the internet. The they were the it was yeah they're the ones established was the fact check dot org power behind snopes they had truth and safety committees created these so they're the ones that's apparently all of us were behind shadow banning. And so then we move on to the. To the pandemic and the same idea was you had safety was a concern because if you were spreading what they called disinformation skepticism towards the pandemic narrative in the response to it even the vaccines you were harming people words of harm people so make people not go out get the vaccine and they get sick and die that was the idea so justified you know suppressing. Discussion curating martyr in contact on the on the internet regarding the various views or criticisms of the pandemic narrative. And again it was safety was the good was it so if you if you just if you had anything that that that. The different from this announcements of the CDC or Anthony Fauci you. You be fact checked and you said you know and then it would be the disinformation and you be banned or you're you're you're you lose your platform or your your account or something or be you'd be suspended and so this is the original justification for it now the truth is what happened was the internet. But the internet did was it was created a a a some a some a symmetrical a symmetrical situation where for the first time. 100 to 1000 millions of little people could voice their opinion and have it matter whereas in the past media was only controlled by corporations because you know freedom of the press only applies to those people who are. Wealthy net the own printing press is the someone wants observe so what you could have first amendment free speech. Feel in the press and the power set B were in position to control the flow of information and the public narrative on these things public discourse on these things. There really was an information revolution at the turn of the century with the internet and for about. 10 15 years wild west and they lost control the narrative which is why around 2016. They began heavily censoring the the internet and controlling the flow of information trying to control the narrative and they've never quite gotten you know control of it and so that's why now you have your thing is. The way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the way you know the the atoms administration that I think made it illegal to criticize Congress the president but not the vice president because the vice president was Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Schede, he came President in 1801, he let the laws expire, but this was a direct assault on free speech. Now if you look at free speech. jurisprudence throughout history, it's changed someone. It used to be that the idea was was no prior restraint, meaning that they couldn't suppress you, but you could be held accountable for the things that you wrote or said. And we saw that, really up until we have obviously we have the example of Abraham Lincoln and his suppression of the press and free speech during civil war invoking a crisis. And he shut down dozens of newspapers, arrested, even arrested a congressman for criticizing his policy, arrested, I think he arrested the mayor of Baltimore, shut down state legislatures. There were sympathetic towards succession or sympathetic towards the south. And so you had that violation occurred during that war. Then he had the um, the first world war when Woodward Wilson had gotten the country into the war of his regime in Europe. And there's of course this is very unpopular. And nevertheless he got Congress to pass the el- sorry, it was the Sedition Act and the Espionage Act. And it was a very broad interpretation what Sedition and Espionage was, so much so that if you even criticized the draft or to criticize the war, America's actually the war, you could be accused of espionage in sedition and you know, very public figures like Eugene Debs or Fonda de Prism actually sentenced to 20 years in prison. He got out after a few years, I think Warren Harding, about pardon him, in 1920. But nevertheless, you know, I think it was the shank decision where it was Oliver Wunderhomes said, you know, clear and present danger for free speech. That's, you know, yeah, you've read the free speech, don't have right to yell fire in a crowded theater. Apparently criticized the Wilson administration's, uh, uh, drive the war was the equivalent of yelling fire in a crowded theater. But then they, the court took a sort of a more of a libertarian apprisa free speech, where you didn't have parish restraint. And I think it was the Brandenburg case where if it was only if your speech presented a direct threat, meaning it to say you were ahead of a mob, you told the mob to go lynch someone or kill someone, harm someone, then you could be held responsible speech. But you could be held responsible if indirectly you said something and someone responded like you wrote an article, you said speech and a two weeks later someone went out and did something, you could be held responsible for that. So that was sort of the Brandenburg, uh, ruling. I think that was the late 60s. A lot of that was responsible to anti-viet non-more protest. He was going on there. So legally people have sort of had this free speech, but this was more important is the right to free speech and the right to feed on the press as a practical matter is the moment your free speech starts to ruffle the feathers of those in power. You find it is very circumscribed, very limited. Good example was in the 1930s you had father, Kaufflin, who had a nationwide radio program. He was very critical to frankly the non-roso-ministration, particularly its policies, vis-a-vis the war in Europe. And he was shut down pretty much, pretty much of a parapolitical move where although he wasn't officially stifled, powers that be, uh, got his radio, you know, used the regulatory powers of the, uh, uh, federal, of the Federal Communication Commission to, to, to, so to de-platform. He lost his program. And I believe in even so much that the US mail service wouldn't deliver his, um, his newsletters or his newspaper, which had a million subscribers. So he was shut down. They didn't like content with it. And so that, that occurred. And so he, you know, except, he, the platform, and goes back a long way. And so the idea was that, obviously, the powers that be, though given the, the scale and the size required to create mass communication, provide news, obviously the networks, whether it's the radio stations, with the TV station, with the nationwide newspapers with nationwide syndication, like the Washington Post, or the New York Times, they also heavily influenced the other papers, even before the age of concentration. All of this is what they reported would be fed to the, fed to the other local newspapers, which may be privately owned or locally owned. So it was those, uh, I guess, uh, focal points of information, or, uh, choke points, they could control the flow of information. So practically speaking, yeah, you, you'd write the print and print, and you'd write the same things, but you really had no influence unless you were, you know, in with the big boys. And even going back, as far back as I think it was 1917 Oscar Gallo, he was a Congressman, spoke on the, uh, the House floor gave a speech, how, and then run up to the first world war, something I was talking about earlier, we're, we're, we're Wilson, uh, the various, uh, JP Morgan, the money power got together, and they bought up all the major news papers installed at editors that were congenial, friendly to their agenda, which is getting the country into the war. So the information was very controlled. Um, and so there you have it. I mean, but it was the internet in the, uh, about 15 years ago, which changed this, the, the, um, the gatekeepers were around, but all the walls came down, which is why you had this revolution. I think really literally was an internet information revolution, a challenge to the powers that be YouTube and, uh, Twitter, Twitter, I mean, if Elon Musk does impose a free speech environment, Twitter, it would be a, a reversion to what it once was. That's what people forget. So this is why people go on crazy on the left or so upset about it, because they can't contend with a free speech, free speech environment. So that's, yeah, that's, again, that's one of these things where again, yeah, we have free speech for the moment it matters. It'll be very, uh, limited. You'll find yourself in trouble, you know, as, as, yeah. So, yeah, for sure. I, uh, that was, that was absolutely brilliant. I believe we, you should, we should, that was the good synopsis of that, um, that whole trajectory. Um, I, I look at free speech, um, you know, as a political force that we're dealing with now, um, sort of beginning at the end of World War II, um, when you had, uh, the authoritarian personality being created by the American Jewish committee, which after 23, they, they say they're going to use arrows as propaganda against Gentiles. And they're going to use the entire psychological, you know, power of science to do this. And then that becomes N.K. Ultra. Now, at that point, free speech is really good, isn't it? Because it's helping them. Yes. Of course. So you'd get like the pond broker with naked breasts. Right. And now, notice that the pond broker was covered by the Holocaust. You couldn't really criticize the film too much because it was jay. It was so heart moving and it was about the Holocaust. But under free speech, under the, the, the power of, of, uh, chapter 23 of the authoritarian personality, which of course becomes N.K. Ultra. And they study how to do all this. You get stuff like naked lunch, memorably, in burrows with his just insane heroin, riddled, murderous kind of, um, debasing of the human spirit, uh, literature, which is now protected by free speech because it's, they're moving in the direction that they want to take culture. This is all protected by free speech. The first amendment is something we should all as Americans die for. Now, you're absolutely right. So the internet comes out. And what is the first thing that we have to do to protect the free speeches? We have to permit pornography. Yeah. I mean, pornography was, what was defended by free speech to the nth degree. Um, and so lo and behold, the internet opens up and you have all these porn sites everywhere, right? But then two things happen. Well, well, a couple things happen. But one was, um, Gary Webb brought out, um, dark alliance and he had all the data set. Yeah, that was, yeah, that was the one of the first examples of the inner of an interactive website. You could click on the sources and read the documents. Oh, it's fine. And it's because they were like attacking him saying, you know, he was claiming that the CIA was putting cocaine and crack cocaine into the, into the ghettos and the, and the mainstream meeting where hammering him and he said, okay, well, look, here's the documents. You make up your own mind. Yeah. So that was the power of the internet. And because they were pushing pornography, all they did was murder him, right? Yeah, before he was at the San Jose Mercury News, it would sound like they'd be right next to the internet would be in creative. Then they disintegrated them. They disintegrated. The, the, the commit suicide events that were too bullets in the head. Yeah, yeah. Because, yeah, question this. I mean, Tim, you've got to have real resolve because when you miss with the first one to finish yourself off with the second, I mean, that, that takes guts. But here's the, here's what he said, Gary Web said a speech. He said, um, there I was a reporter getting these awards and accolades because I wasn't reporting on anything important. The moment I reported on something, a port in my career was wrong. And there's your, there's your first amendment. There's your first amendment. But anyway, so, so, so now the, the, the, the oligarchs are sitting there and they're going, wait a second. This is not the free speech we want free speech to be all the everyone's staring at pornography. What is this Gary Web coming up with? Um, and then came 911. And this was really, you know, it, it all been set up perfectly in a kind of magical way, where suddenly, as you say, the common person could start exchanging information. And it was a wildfire. There was just everywhere. There was like, people analyzing the collapse of the building. And this was creating the independent media and also kind of beginning the idea of the government was a secret society against this. This was getting out into people. And during this period from like, to, from like, when Web posts up to the time of, of the, the COVID beginning of the COVID, um, there had been, um, you know, they, they, they had tried to promote free speech when it comes to pornography. But they found clever ways to resist it when it comes to, uh, um, basic exposing like undemocratic Jewish influence, say, or are people questioning the Holocaust now? There was a ton of that stuff. That, that was some of the first deep platforming, deleting. This is when they were trying to delete it, but it was hard to control. I mean, this was when a lot of people started wondering about certain aspects of the Holocaust, you know, they're going, what the fucking has looked fake, you know, what's going on here? Um, so what they did was they created cul-de-sacs, right? Like Alex Jones, who gives you lots of good information, but he stays away from the areas that they don't want you to go into. You know, he's very much, you know, opposed to any kind of criticisms of, of, of Israel. And in fact, we'll talk about sharia laws, the problem. So this is just an obvious, um, lifetime actor. This is a cul-de-sac, um, but in spite of all that, the, the, the normal, unleashed power of the mind of the, of the, of Hoy-Poleu, started to engage. And you could see what was happening. There was really an incredible bifurcation occurring. There was, there was not just an independent media. There was an independent political movement that was starting to be, you could actually see it in some, in some polling data, like 3%, 5%, people just don't buy it. They, and they had really articulate reasons. And this was going to grow. So the wild west with the free speech disappears. And suddenly you have the COVID restrictions, right? So now they have got to break apart the, the burgeoning political force, which was directly in opposition to what was trying to be created through the authoritarian personality science, right? This, what was coming out of the independent media was literally 180 degrees. Everything that they were trying to achieve with the authoritarian personality, MK-Oltra control. It was being contested and opposed by this little tiny group that was, because it had truth on its side, it was growing in numbers. So this is why, I think if you look at the trajectory, this is why you had COVID, because they had to do the walk down now. I think they, if they, if they had had the success with the internet that they wanted, they would have taken it far more technology, would have been created, they would have had like, you know, pornography. It would have been like a brave new world kind of setup with just pornography and drugs to control everyone before the genocide. So they didn't have to read about anything. They brought out COVID, but it was really ham-handed. And the independent media, which they needed, they needed the internet in order to, to get people afraid of COVID enough to accept the walk down, the independent media was really battered, you know, by it, but it didn't go out of existence. And it rallied and it started to oppose COVID. It started to expose COVID as as just a, you know, a way to walk us down and eventually genocide us. And so now we have, you know, the COVID thing, I think it's pretty well been defeated, but when I look at, you know, like Poland sending back, they'll 50 million doses, telling them to just piss off or not interested in it anymore. We just don't want the vaccine. When I look at the uptake of boosters in my area at like 1% of what they thought they were going to get. So they've lost the war. We have actually defeated this particular thrust. The question is, did they do enough damage with the vaccine to really, is this a mortal blow against the population from which they can eventually wipe us out? I doubt it. So anyway, we now have the, you know, the real thing. If you look at the authoritarian personality going back to the beginning of this, it was two things. It was pornography on one side, kind of like we're going to get rid of every aspect of the family. We're going to go full Herbert Mark Kuz. There's going to be no family. There's going to be polysexualism. There's going to be sex everywhere. Everyone will raise the kids who, they will know who's the father. You know, it's just going to be this clump. And this is going to be a delightful culture, Christian culture, European culture. This is boring and authoritarian. So this is where we're going to head. Well, that was just the half of it. What we didn't see, that's kind of visible. But the half that's harder to see, Tim, is just how they were trying to shape the understanding of the Holocaust. The the Jew as victim, you know, this was another important meme for the oligarchs. They wanted to have that as a way to intimidate, you know, that so you couldn't really think clearly about any of these structures. Well, that's the control public discourse is they, they, they, they, they, they make the power of antisemt in the charge. So potent that people will be nudge to to move away from these areas. So from that, they can then create them have defense basically of the pornographic film industry, which shatters a family and, and of course, the, the, you know, the all of the aspects of the destruction of ethnicities. None of that can be questioned. You know, so this is, this is really the trajectory free speech is just a, it was just a tool of, you know, basically this group that they used to bring in what they thought would be destructive. And of course, they will turn it off whenever they see anyone using their mind to expose the motivation for all of these things which have changed them destroy our culture. Yeah. Um, if you look at, you know, the earlier part, the, uh, uh, the, or earlier history of our country, I'll say pre 1950, you had the assaults or the, uh, uh, attacks on the First Amendment or Brisbane subvert were mostly carried out by the government. These are direct like that. I mentioned the yellow, the espionage and sedition acts of 1917 during the First World War. And you also had the sort of control information during the Second World War, all the name of national security, of course. Um, but, uh, since the court embraced sort of, again, that, that Brandenburg doctrine, the assault on, on, on the First Amendment, the free speech had to be sort of, uh, indirect or covert or parapolitical. Um, so, you know, things like, I mean, obviously the free press, if you have something like, uh, Operation Mockingbird and the control of the press, uh, you know, the idea of being manipulated by the CIA and other private intelligence operations like the ADL, the Southern Poffee Law Center, or other organizations, or even Israeli intelligence. So, you know, obviously, if you have Israeli agents who are, or people Zionist, who are editors of newspapers, they're going to act on behalf of the state of Israel. And we had, we had that. We even had Supreme Court Cheshire, it's like, Louis Brandeis, the first Jewish Supreme Court justice, uh, was in Zionist agent, that was his primary loyalty. Um, so our system is very, is very, uh, I guess you could say, very vulnerable to being, uh, uh, subverted by these outside, you know, and, uh, parties or agents, agents of other powers. That, uh, but the, but the idea is, um, you didn't, um, go after the first amendment per se, directly, the British and the free speech, which you did was you created a situation where they'd be canceled or disintegrated. This is an old strategy. This goes back to the 1950s, you had something called dynamic science, where the Jews would, would boycott you behind the scenes, if you uh, uh, promoted, uh, or spoke of, um, things that didn't, uh, serve their interests. And good example was Dorothy Thompson, who was a, uh, lady journalist who, uh, ran a foul of the, uh, Israeli lobby in the late 1940s, and then she lost her syndicated column or radio show, all behind the scenes, because she came out against, she reported what was going on in Palestine in the late 1940s, and she called the dynamic silence. And then you had, you know, the whole, uh, what you had with, um, uh, good example is, uh, recently, we had something like the, uh, the, uh, the, uh, the response to the, uh, the BDS movement, the boycott, the investment and sanction movement, uh, there was gaining traction, uh, targeting Israel, uh, for the treatment of the Palestinians. Now you had behind the scenes, not so much by the scene, kind of, uh, for some reason, in several states, there will get these laws passed, where in order for you to, uh, you know, attend a university, work at a university or receive a, uh, like a flood relief check. I think this happened in state of Texas. You'd have to sign a pledge saying you would not support the BDS movement. Right. How does that get passed, right? I mean, state of Florida has a, has a law like this. So these things, uh, again, these are all ways that you suppress someone's free speech, because you make it very uncomfortable, uncomfortable for them to, uh, to not only come out publicly and say things, but those who support, it's a chilling effect, if you will, you know, uh, then you have the whole the old cancel culture movement, which, which, which, uh, you know, it says, uh, come on in the past 10 years, which is all part of hate speech, political correctness, and these things. Where, if you, again, if you, if you work for a corporation, uh, or you're, you're in a position of any, any, any, uh, any responsibility, you have to tow the line. This is, again, enforced through human resource departments of the corporations, of course, these corporations, we're all in line with the whole global homoplyphal correctness, uh, stuff, because, um, it's all part of their, you know, their global economic plan. Uh, you know, it's like, um, BlackRock and Larry Fink talking about, uh, corporate, uh, ES, ES and G, which is environmental social values and governance with the corporations, are going to impose their values on the public, uh, by not only can, uh, there are human resource hiring practices, but also, uh, some of like BlackRock or Vanguard where they control trillions and assets, control what gets, you know, where the money is invested. So you can have a situation like the Disney corporation can, can actually presume to be able to tell the state of photo what laws it should have, uh, to or like, you said a jack because there's something I wanted to mention before, like, that was just quite amused by this, you know, um, Disney, um, they fired, uh, the guy who act, Joff Morrell, who he'd actually been the guy who, I mean, you know, you had the, the CEO made the declaration of me a co-plot to the people about their work, they weren't transgender enough. But anyway, it was Morrell who'd actually been kind of the, he was the operational guy. And so he, he got fired and, and now he went. But anyway, what I wanted to read, I meant to, to share this is that Chapec, you know, the guy who did the big, uh, kind of flexion and, you know, like we're going to be much more transgender going forward. So he's hired a new person. Believe it or not, they had, her name is Christina Shaqt, shaped. Um, and I just wanted, she has tremendous qualifications for running an entertainment company. Uh, yeah, this is that I'm reading from, from his memo to the staff introducing area. We are incredibly fortunate to have Christina with us at this important time. Her 30 plus years of experience include roles leading President Biden's COVID-19 vaccine education program, communications for Instagram and leadership positions and political campaigns in the Obama White House. Now, I mean, with that CV, of course, she's going to be the head of Disney. There's just what else can you do? Yeah. Right? Yeah. So, so there it is, you know, just, uh, when you mentioned Disney, I thought that we should, we should burn mine at Disney is, uh, you know, they're not some kind of sham political corporation masquerading as an entertainment thing, but they get real. Yeah. And I think, aren't they one of the five corporations that control the media? 90? Yeah. Yeah. And so when you have freedom of the press and free speech, again, the right to, you know, the free press, only the plus those who are who are wealthy have to own a printing press, as they say. So you have five interlocking corporations that own the major media and they control the flow of information and they control the narrative. And again, they all get together Davos or Bilderberg or whatever, you know, Jackson, Hawaii, Obing and they, they, they meet and they strategize and discuss what their agenda is going to be is again, the first amendment. Yeah. On paper guarantees free speech, whatever it does is it guarantees the right for the oligarchs to control the narrative free speech, private court, you know, very few wealthy control the information. The difference being is for the law, and this was the situation the longest time. I mean, now you did have, again, despite wealthy family that had a situation in America is very decentralized. It wasn't time you had local families that own papers and that that the focus of these newspapers reflected the values of the family like those used to own LA times, right? Or even when Manifesto, although he was kind of a big personality, he himself was very, he was at the mercy of Jewish power. And that's why he he was got his newspaper behind the Leo Frank story trying to create the myth that he was unjustly convicted and that he did this because those who controlled advertising in New York threatened to overthrow advertising unless he didn't back that back that up. But I guess it off-ox at the New York Times who supposedly was reluctant to get on board their Leo Frank thing ultimately did it again because he was Jewish. But the whole point is, but nevertheless, you did have a lot of decentralization going on there. But again, what's been written about in the past 20, 30 years is the heavy concentration that occurred in the media since the since the since the end of the 1980s. And it's been not surprising. There's been a noticeable qualitative of any decline in the quality of journalism in the country. So much so that although you had some good journalism, you know, at least they put on a show in six, seven, eight, and you did have pockets in real journalism. You don't have that anymore in these papers. But the internet changed it because you had what's a journalist, right? You had bloggers get out and so what you noticed about 50 years, the most interesting things, most insightful commentary and investigation occurred on the internet and not out these established the legacy media, which were just kind of going on a nurse shirt at that point. And I think the public caught onto this, which is why they had this shut it down in 2016, because regardless of what you think of Trump, the media played the internet and the internet made it a big part in his election in 2016. And there was, and they went, they went crazy, a Trump-duration syndrome, which was part of a controlled dialect, but then level lesson was real. And they went insane, which is why talking about media like the Time Magazine piece, in February of 2021, when they admitted, they peacefully admitted that there was a concerted effort, a conspiracy, if you will, of big tech, organized labor, and the media to secure the election, and what they mean by securing the election was getting Biden installed. For whatever reason, they needed Biden in there for kind of like what you talk about, which is, Trump wasn't as much, Trump was too cognizant for the for the genital that's being carried under Biden. So they need this walking corpse just to do their bidding, but also to humiliate everybody, because it's humiliating to see him as president. Yeah, absolutely right. I think that Trump was carefully crafted his personality, and it absorbed a lot of the internet kind of independent thinking, in other words, Trump merged a bit with Kulanon. But you're saying Trump was a media curation? Yeah, well, not the shock. You're fired. You're fired. So when they constructed the character, it absorbed like a fraction. And it was again, it's like Alex Jones. This is a cul-de-sac. They're trying to pull that group that wants to rebel into their mainstream personality structure, whatever I call it, so that they can control it so it won't go anywhere. That was why the whole Kulanon thing was just, it right up to the point of the inauguration of Biden, the rumors were flying. I mean, even one six of those poor devils that were there, for the demonstration, they thought that they were coming and there was going to be a real chance for overturning a stolen election, and that they were going to be part of it. So this was a way to deal with and blunt the independent media power that had certainly, to a fraction, had bought into Trump as a legitimate opposition to deep state. Well, didn't our friend Yankevic, what's your name? Yankevic? Yankevic? Say that predict that they were coming with weapons to bring the White House and all that. Why don't we bring the Capitol down? He's been disinformation. Isn't that disinformation? Of course, but the point is that we were dealing with media personalities. When you look at the pixelated reality, when you leave the socratic world of the independent media, which get questions everything and doesn't give any trust to any personality, when you leave that world, get to be very careful because they are where we exist now, and they have lots of clever personalities that are there to try to pick us off. Well, who was the Kimberlott idea of cognitive infiltration? Under the Obama administration, that lawyer, he got costumes from Quirta Perman, what was his name? I think he's Jewish. But so this is what we're going on, and it goes on now. You have Robert Malone, who has claimed that he's been Red Pill and he's moved. He starts out as a critic of the famous and meteoric rise as a critic of the vaccine. He has a background in vaccine, developing vaccine technology. So he's very authoritative in this screen as criticisms. But he brings out this idea that well, in back of this is a noble lie. The people in the government mean well, but they feel they have to lie about the effectiveness and safety of the vaccine because they believe it's for your own good. It's a noble lie. I'm sorry, it was Cass Sunstein. Right, Cass Sunstein. Yeah. He was the Obama administration. I think I figured we're positioned in this whole. He's very honest. He actually would just tell what was about to happen and then execute the plan. So this is the thing. You have to be very careful with these personalities. Now, the independent media has grown using these personalities. People like, I mean, Alex Jones, I think has been, you know, in general, very instrumental in giving a lot of people to be interested in these ideas. And the question is, is can you transition from the cul-de-sac out into the highway? You know, it's used in analogy, where you can get out and start going beyond the people who brought you in, who are just there to slow you down or to give you some information that doesn't let you really progress all the way out into life. They're trying to keep us from organizing a resistance. But I think that good luck, we'll see what happens to them. Good luck to them because they will not be able to control, I think. I don't think they may have control. The vaccine damage narrative. I think that's going to get loose and that will create some anger, which is what we need to be really creative real resistance. And then I also think that the hunger thing, I mean, to me, this just again, like it's like COVID, it seems to me to be too fake for most people to accept. Did I think a lot of people are going to look at this and they're going to go, you know, this is self-inflicted. It's like the damage from COVID and which it comes from the lock. Now, this is self-inflicted. This could easily be the government being malevolent and having a clever story that they're telling to the public in order to reduce our population. So, you know, you have vaccine damage and hunger and of course energy shortages, which incidentally are biting right now in Europe. I talked to someone this last week who has family in central Europe and they say they're there and oh gosh, they're either an Austrian or Germany, but they have to leave the country to get food. I mean, this was actually given to me as a point of fact that they leave to go to to Czechoslovakia. They make a drive once a month. They can get out and they load the car because that's where they food is still available. They say that it's really getting tight in central Europe. Now, fortunately, the people have seen this coming and I think you're going to see a lot of gardens under like village control popping up vegetables and fruit going forward. The Europeans, you know, are a tough lot. They know to survive. But of course, it's also going to be, you know, a time when I think the vaccine damage will start to pop up and you know, it looks to me like next winter would be tough, but every winter looks tough to me, you know, with when you don't have any political power and the government is malevolent and organized against you. Yeah, and if you look at the situation, like the food situation or the energy situation, there's a shortage that was completely created by bad policies. It's so bad that it's hard to say that, you know, it's not something that they didn't see coming. A good example is obviously if you look at the lack of diplomacy in the part of the United States and NATO of the ZIVI Russia, you can clearly see that they're taking a position. They were designed to provoke a conflict. It just, it came out that that Zalinsky admitted that he was not going to be invited to join NATO, but not to let that out. So as to entice Russia into invading, they want to they want out of conflict. You know, the situation was so avoidable that it's hard to see anything but malevolence. Anything but malevolence means to create the pretext for shortages in a crisis. It might speak the whole agenda with collapsing the currency. This is a, this is how you get a transition from one currency to another. Ultimately, maybe to get to get to the such a bank digital currencies that they've been wanting to impose for several decades now. Well, look at all the things which are the resulted government or either just bizarre circumstances or direct government levelings. You've got at one time you've got the food processing plants be hit by falling airplanes. So, sorry, was it two two plans in two weeks? Three. Three. In a couple months, yeah. So, so they're, you know, they're just like a perhaps this is a, you know, they're related to the group that took down the twin towers. I don't know. But I guess it'd be like looking at the assault. Anyway, so thing what you guys are calling an accident. So, the same plans being destroyed. The bird flu, of course, that, what did that come from? You've got the railroads for some reason have stopped caring fertilizer. They put a bat now. I don't know if you followed that, but there's, yeah, what's the, they give a reason? What is the not? At the same time, Russia now has stopped selling fertilizer because of the sanctions. Yeah, we have lockdowns. You've got the hamburger all getting recalled in parts of the country. And at the same time, the ports are clogged and not operating in both LA and in Singapore where the major, you know, back and forth is, should be taking place. I mean, these are all things which don't need to happen. And they make no sense as a collection unless there is an organizing principle to bring them into existence. And didn't fact is going to be understood by the public, particularly when they started getting hungry next winter? Didn't the, I mean, Henry Kessinger, he's a, the status-run character, right? I think so. Right. Didn't he, I guess he wrote in 1970s that food was the ultimate weapon? Yeah. So food and energy, you know, so you can throttle and manipulate these things to achieve a political situation. It might be too crooked. I mean, they say that food, you know, food sources create a revolution environment where there might be those, I guess, interest or powers that shouldn't be out there that want a volatile political situation. And the way you get that is you create these shortages. It wouldn't be the first time in history that's been done. And global hold tomorrow. I mean, this is gigantic population, Dr. Kessinger. It's all going to hit us at one time. Yeah. The vaccine damage will suddenly start to pick off people's immune systems and they're going to have massive illness at the same time when there's going to be, you know, not in a food to go around. And of course, this was foreshadowed by the zombie movies. And then energy will be very tough, right? You're going to have like, it'll be very cold, the houses, how you're going to heat homes in central Europe and in northern United States. It's going to be, this will all be a disaster. And then the currency, notice that the Fed is hiking rates the first time in years. This is just making it more expensive for the whole system to work. You know, it's all this to me is what you call a great reset when the real thing that's getting reset is the population. And the great reset is the solution to the Georgia Guidestone declarations. Yeah. And if you look at with Mr. Blinken and Ms. Yellen and Mr. Silvers at overseeing the internet with Yankevich with Mayorkas, another tribesman in charge of Department of Homeland Security. Yeah. It does. It makes a scratch your head, doesn't it? But it just shows you why we have to keep trying to communicate with one another. Everyone should try to, if you can, get out podcasts, be brave, communicate with people who are close to coming out into the white, explain to them that this looks organized. And if it is, how do we prepare ourselves? How do we get through it? Yeah. Just got to do it. I mean, it's like it's not our comfort zone. But man, I don't know what else to tell people. Yeah, by the, the bird flu pandemic is other way it's been discovered or way it's been confirmed is through PCR test on chickens. Are they able to get on planes? So what they do is they'll say because disease may spread from chicken from bird to man or from pig to man, you just slaughter them also. You don't get sick. But in the end, you'll starve to death because no food, nothing to eat. Yeah. I mean, thank you so much. Here's from nuts and bolts of bignia. I get asked all the time, like, well, what do you do? I say, look, the main staple that people should have is rice. You cannot live on it. You will starve to death if you think you're on rice for 60 days. But it is, if you have like, you can get like a couple hundred pounds, not too expensive. That'll be the basis. And then if you can add to it some vegetables and fruit, you can get through for years, right? And it'll be healthy, particularly if every thes