9/11 - The Big Lie

Video Transcript:

According to some estimates we cannot track 2.3 trillion dollars in transactions 2.3 trillion with a T Whoa What the fuck is that? Oh Oh, Bill just collapsed inside the lobby Yes it was Yeah, definitely secondary slope, but there's inside waiting to go up stairs on the way upstairs Just just collapse Basement Oh That's the bomb we say the second one that's what we're told the second plane we shot I'm telling you Do you have how much of the plane actually impacted the building you know it might have appeared that way But from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in and as I said the only pieces left That you can see Like that anywhere around which would indicate the entire plane crashed Oh Oh oh After September In the past two years, the terrorists attacked America. Three began to follow the same path with two steps to pass the plan and to the In-E-Hole-Praise Center, 1 and 2. There are more information to talk about, which will start with the majority of the media. There is a whole lot of information that is out of the end and that is absolutely necessary to do, say, said and heard. I think to take part in this information is important to people to understand that the media is not to give a right to the objective of reporting. But he's comfortably involved in another attack. It can be good to emphasize that a whole lot of the pictures are political research behind the Saphon hashtag.� presents the ... Fish, Merger ... ... of any part of the Saphon Command and obvious accounts described as Falkitz interest... currently in the primary administration. Not ready enough but they want to handle in not any discussion. I'm gonna steer the steer, so I'm gonna go wash. I don't know, I haven't seen the red number three, two, two. All right. First of all, he's not the nominee. But, uh... Look, I look for him. The pygamous? No, I'm not gonna lose. You both remember of Spell and Bones, a secret society at Yale. What does that tell us? Not much, because it's a secret. Is there a secret handshake? Is there a secret code? I wish there were something secret I could manifest. 322? Secret number? There are all kinds of secrets. But one thing is not a secret. I disagree with this president's direction that he's taking the country. We can do a better job, and I intend to do it. And we'll be watching the safe in the campaign for John Kerry, who is their joining us. And we'll be right back. Nine of the men who signed the Declaration of Independence were a free Mason's, as were more than a dozen U.S. presidents, including George Washington, who famously laid the cornerstone of the Capitol building, clad in his ceremonial Masonic apron. These days, Mason's can still be found in powerful government positions. Masonic historian Arturo DeHoyas. We have egalitarian ideas. We believe that people should rule themselves. They should elect their own leaders. They should be governed by constitutions. Have separations of power. Senator Chuck Grassley's a Mason. So is Senator John Tester. But getting someone to chat about it can sometimes be tricky. I'm doing health care. Senator Mike Enzi didn't break stride while explaining why he's part of the secret of society. It's a brotherhood built on constructing good men. Yet behind these closed doors. I became a Mason in my local lodge in Beckley, Washington, Virginia. Secrets revealed. This was this 32nd degree. Congressman Nick Rahal, a Mason for almost four decades, decoded Masonry's most prolific symbol. You may see the compass in the square, it's symbols of panic training. We live by the square. We're upright individuals. The Congressman describes Masonry as a fraternity. He says his mentor and fellow Mason, West Virginia Senator Robert Bird, nominated him for membership. As a 33rd degree Mason, the highest level in the Scottish right of free Masonry, Congressman Rahal acknowledges there are a lot of secrets and codes, but he says they're not sinister. So are you trying to rule the world? Well, let's say no. But if we were, would I tell you? No. Congressman Rahal says free Masonry today is more of a social organization and despite the prominent positions of some members, is not a forum to discuss power politics. John Kieran. You're laying a key hand on this morning, Elaine. Thanks. We should also mention too that they raise millions upon millions of dollars every year for charity. Yeah, and he wouldn't tell you if they ruled the world. I like that. We know that all the official arrests were handed under 9-11. Two plans were taken to Russia. We have to say that. But folks who are on the same spot have another plan. This is a secondary explosion, probably a device. He had planted before for a 20-year correct that he did not explore until he had been hailed later. If then somebody said that they saw an airliner going to one of those towers. Then, no, an hour later than that, we had that big explosion from much, much lower. I don't know what the Earth's cause. I'd holy hell coming down downstairs. And then we'd go, we got finally got to the bottom, we were coming out, a misanning level there, and another explosion came right on the other side of the one flying. Big boom. Come down to steps, everything fine, we got to the basement and everything just fell in. I got strapped on there, we're another guy crawled out, kept getting hit in the head, had bounced all around, trying to pull it all the way out over the rubble. We were heading up to the 24th floor to stay at well, and all the sudden, up building got rocked. We got bounced around in the stairwell like bin balls, man. And we just said, you know what, time to go. We came down and it looked like a bomb went off in the lobby. Everything was exploded, everything was gone. Like what is going on? Even for the every window in the lobby, they'd be exploded. I mean, then windows were like, you stick this, forget it. There were two, three inch glasses, you know, come on. They exploded out of the lobby. You know, it was something, it wasn't, it wasn't front of Jefffield. No way. I was there for 20 years, and I was a janitor, the person that cleaned all the floors. The building had six up levels of basement. The support companies for the cleaning of the Wartre Center were located on Big One. What I was there, at 846, all of a sudden, we hear a boom. An explosion so hard that pushes up. When I went to verbalize it, like six seconds after, we hear that boom, that impact all the way on the top. So two different events. And at that very moment, when I said, oh my god, a guy comes running into the office, and this guy, his hands extended, both arms like this, and his skin was pulled totally from both arms, and he was hanging from the top of the fingertips, like he was clothing. And I thought at that time that he was clothing. And when I went to say something, I realized, I look at his face, I realized that he had missing parts of his face. He had, on that particular day, the only master key, he went up with the master key, unlocking door after door so firemen could get in, and he himself, I think he said, bought out 15 or 20 people. So I started opening the doors of this terrible wealth so people could escape. Willie was made a hero, and he was at the White House, and we have a picture of that, of George Bush, honoring Willi Rodriguez for being a hero. We hear boom, boom, boom, different explosions, and I asked the fire department, he said, what is this explosion, and what they said was, maybe it's a gas tank from the kitchen. No, the cushions were all electrical, so that didn't make any sense. This is the exhibition for the FDAT plan that had flown in the building. This is the exhibition that was just natural to be able to get out. I heard a big explosion before the building fell. I saw it as it was happening, and it sounded as if you had a hundred of those black-hats, firecrackers, and a little more, off at once. That's what it sounded like. It sounded like the finale of the Fourth of July. As the first tower came down, there were a series of explosions. It was like, boom, boom, you could hear the echoes of the explosions echoing off the different buildings. The detonation started, and they went, boom, boom, boom, boom, they were a little less than a second apart. Below the fire I saw from the corner, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, it's just like 20 straight hits. It sounded like a plane to take down a building. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. From far away, boom, boom, boom. Second tower number one, the second tower collapse. It was the exact, exact, same series of detonations. And then it just sounded like firecrackers. Crack, crack, crack, crack, crack, crack. And we hooked up, and the second tower was coming down. For example, a series of loud concussions can be heard just before the collapse begins. On the left, covered by smoke, is the South Tower, moments before the collapse. Firefighter Richard Benesisky speaking of the South Tower said, there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television when they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt. All these explosions. Deputy Commissioner Thomas Fitzpatrick said, it looked like sparkling around one specific layer of the building. My initial reaction was that this was exactly the way it looks when they show you these implosions on TV. A few witnesses spoke of horizontal ejections. Chief Frank Kreather said, there was what appeared to be an explosion. It appeared at the very top simultaneously from all four sides. Material shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse. This testimony is very important because the official theory says that the horizontal ejections were produced when the floors collapsed and pushed the materials out. So listen to firefighter James Karein, who said, I looked back and I heard like every floor went, choo choo choo choo. I looked back and from the pressure, everything was getting blown out of the floors before it actually collapsed. If all these firefighters and medical workers witnessed all these phenomena, suggestive of controlled demolition. It might be wondered why they have not spoken out. Part of the answer is probably provided by auxiliary lieutenant fireman Paul Isaac. Having said that there were definitely bombs in those buildings. Isaac added that many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they're afraid for their jobs to admit it because the higher-ups forget for bit discussion of this fact. Isaac, for example, has more recently said, I know 9-11 was an inside job, but police know it's an inside job. And the firemen know it too, but you have not heard this on the nightly news. The pressure from the man here has made America better to be a commissioner so that more details could be specified what the militants had had. It has led to a detailed technical handling of sexual suicide and what the 7-11 would have done. It was not a matter of the execution of the execution. No, it was not a matter of law to not try this theory. What they are afraid of is that Paul Balinger has made a lot of material that the execution of the execution can still be a little bit of a commission that would really make problems. We are listening to a man who has worked in the environment to demolish buildings. What he has said. He has worked for control demolition, incorporated CDI, the top-rated explosive demolition firm in the world, owned by the Lwazo family during the year surrounding 9-11. I worked for them as an explosives loader for 2.5 years. As an explosives loader, my job was to place explosives in the buildings to prepare them for demolition. There are many steps that you need to take. First office, you have to weaken the building. This is the case. You are right. It is a weak in the building. That means all the staircases have to be cut at intervals. The firewalls have to be removed. The elevator shafts have to be cut. I will down to my right. the firewalls have to be removed. The elevator shafts have to be cut. I look down to my right, and the elevator's exploded, something out of like a Bruce Willis die-hut movie. People just come running out of the elevator, on fire, fireball. I mean, it was like, what is going on here? There's something up here. I mean, it planes up there, not as flying down here. Then you have to move to the support columns on the particular load floors. And those are cut by a torch for two reasons. First, to weaken them and also to allow for charges to be placed onto the structure, onto the columns themselves. And that essentially reduces their strength by about 20%. And even with all of that work being done to weaken this building, it still remains safely standing so we can work, continue to work in it. The story that just a few columns can cause a synchronized global collapse. An implosion is, well, that's just nonsense. I don't see how this could actually happen in real life. When we load a building, we have to have all the support columns on a given load floor fail at the same time within milliseconds of one another. And therefore, the entire building comes down in a synchronized implosion. So I think this notion of a one column failure causing an entire building to implode in a synchronized fashion is just nonsense. Looking at the building, it wouldn't be a problem once you gain access to the elevator shafts. How about an elevator modernization, which we know was going on, the nine months prior to 9.11? Yes, elevator world March 2001 documents it. In fact, they were in the middle of this modernization. There are people who noted that the elevators were locked in turn and that there were guards placed at these locked elevators during the modernization. Of course, you would have to have access to security. Securecom was brought in. Who sits on the board of Securecom? Marvin Bush, the younger brother of George Bush. He's an identity of loading experts who would have access to all the core columns and beams. The rest could be accomplished at that point by just the right kind of explosives for the job at hand. The choices are many out there. You wouldn't need miles and miles of dead cord. You could have used wireless remote detonators. And they have been available for years. You need to only look at action movie to see them in use. And of course, the military has them as well. You want to call your mother or something? You're going to have to get back to it. Contractors don't use them on the other hand because they're just too expensive. Well, you wouldn't have found steel casings to be left in the rubble. They haven't been used for years. What we use now is RDX copper-jacqueted shape charges. And when they're initiated, there's nothing left of those charges. And in the case of Thermite, well, Thermite's self-consuming cutting charges have been around since they first patented in 1984. So there would be nothing left in the debris polyaccept some residue of molten iron. You'd get down below and you'd see molten steel. Molten steel running down the channel rails. Like you're in a foundry. You don't hear one massive boom sound. What you do here is smaller explosions going off. Mr. Sunder of NIST has said that you, if this had been a control demolition, you would have heard a large, massive bomb going off. What in reality happens with a control demolition is you hear a successive progressive, smaller waves of smaller explosions going off. In the case of Thermite cutting charges, you would have heard far less noise since they are worked by thermal heating, melting of the steel, rather than an explosive cutting as RDX charges. I knew from day one that this was a controlled event. And why I did that is because simply looking at Building 7, you have a sudden collapse of the building. It's fairly symmetrical as it comes down. There's the classic kink, which means that the center core fails first. And you can see that on the video. And the building falls near freefall. So I really honestly didn't believe this from day one. Because this is the way buildings classically come down. With a controlled demolition. Donna, you're probably the best known builder, particularly of great buildings in the city. There's a great deal of question about whether or not the damage and the ultimate destruction of the buildings was caused by the airplanes, by architectural defect, or possibly by bombs or aftershocks. Do you have any thoughts on that? Well, it wasn't architectural defect. The World Trade Center was always known as a very, very strong building. Don't forget, that took a big bomb in the basement. Now the basement is the most vulnerable place because that's your foundation. And it withstood that. And I got to see that area about three or four days after it took place because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour because he did the building. And I said, I can't believe it. The building was standing solid and half of the columns were blown out. And so this was an unbelievably powerful building. If you don't think about structure, it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside. The steel, the reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows you had the steel on the outside. So you had the steel on the outside of the building. That's why when I first looked and you had big heavy eye beams, when I first looked at it, I couldn't believe it because there was a hole in the steel. And this is steel that was, you remember the width of the windows of the World Trade Center folks, I think you know, if you're up there, they were quite narrow. And in between was this heavy steel. I said, how could a plane even a plane, even a 767 or 747, or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through the steel? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously, because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steelers on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have. And it was almost just like a can of soup. You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into building number two. And when you see that, approach the far side, and then all of a sudden, within a matter of millisecond, the explosion pops out the other side. Right. I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think obviously there were very big planes, they were going very rapidly, because I was also watching where the planes seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building. So it was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane, because you're talking about taking out steel. The heaviest caliber steel that was used on the building. These buildings were rock solid. And, you know, it's just an amazing, amazing thing. This country is different today. And it's going to be different than it ever was for many years to come. Very tough and stable, and very true. Should this information be interesting for you to spin on? Or should you try to do it yourself? More than a few dead information about this country. It's not about the slump that it has taken for me in the media, because it's not so drastic. It's perfect for the people to take the people away from what they are in the middle of the earth. And the people who are in the news are not allowed to take the information we need to change. But there are more to see. Both World Trade Center and Pentagon live in the wrong way. And it's also about taking the plane out into Pentagon's other day. The day before the end of the 11th, the people of Pentagon declared that 2.3 billion dollars have been paid for the Pentagon. So 2.300 billion dollars that they don't have a clue about the country. And also my request to the people of the day after the death of the people of the world. I'm sure that the majority of the people of the world are in the right way. Which country? And I'm sure that they are in the right way to explain how it's still so much money that people can't understand. I understand that I'm in the wrong way to the majority. But what is the report from the people who are in the right place? And what is the most important thing to prove that the plane is actually in the middle of the earth? Do you have how much of the plane actually impacted the building? It might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. Now, even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon, you see that the floors of all collapse, that didn't happen immediately. It wasn't until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapse. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I looked at the hole in the Pentagon, and I looked at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, the plane does not fit in that hole. So what did the Pentagon hit? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on? So we have a time that was generally a job, a job that was to study with the state of the Pentagon for the American military. It also happened that it wasn't possible to plan and to hold the Pentagon. It is the one that broke the Pentagon, and the other thing that was going to happen is that the military is going to have to be afraid. There were many times miles that you were afraid, that you were worried, especially when I was standing in front of the Pentagon that night seeing one of our fortresses pride-opened by a missile airplane. I know what I think, but what do you think? Then we haveashs dari WorldTrade 7ar as RPG becomes the most interesting part right now it's now under dunic religion and we die, but somebody has to reported us, the Red Ark lets take a look at those epic video rantions, all because of the sshe워 simatic something Andersen said if you didn't paint it yourself ...ahahahaha Greenfellow Tower London World Trade Center 7 We should have thought of World Trade Center 7, which would not have been a close of what other buildings would have done. Falling is almost a perfect symmetry of the one in the air. When you normally fall into the building, but you can't make a precise decision to get the same effect. World Trade Center 7 We should have thought of World Trade Center 7 But this is relatively small brand, so we have to wait for it to collapse. And we have to build a 7-way building, or something like that. We started asking questions, everybody started asking questions. And then next thing you know, the brand across represented the pace in the back and forth and in front of the crowd, holding his hand over the radio. I couldn't hear what it was saying, but it was pulsed. Whatever the speech was on air was pulsed. And that means to me, it was most likely a countdown. But it took his hand off at the last three seconds. And he gave this like heartfelt look, like he knew what just broke your life. Because he didn't want to bring it on his conscience. He didn't want to go to his graves. He had a couple seconds to put our heads together and it was like... The Red Cross rep was like, he goes over and he says, well, you got to stay behind this line because they're thinking about bringing the building down. They didn't say what building. They just said, bringing a building down. So we're like, okay, we'll take that word before it. We'll stay behind the line. And he went over and he talked to one of the... Through all the commotion, he goes over and he asks one of the Red Cross or one of the firefighters what was going on. I guess I don't know if he got an answer or not. He came back over with his hand over the radio and it would sound like a countdown. And at the last few seconds he took his hand off and he heard three, two, one. And he was just saying, just run for your life, just run for your life. And then it was like another two, three seconds. You heard explosions. Like boom! It's like a distinct sound. It's not like when the compression like boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. Like floors that were dropping and collapsing. This was boom! And like you felt a rumble in the ground. Almost like you wanted to grab onto something. To me, I knew that was an explosion. There was no doubt in my mind. Building 7 is a great place of silence, as I'm sure you know. It's a 47 story building that came down into its own footprint for no apparent reason at about 5.30pm on September 11th. A countdown to the demolition of Building 7 went out of New York police radio. I was in New York for the Sixth anniversary and every cop I talked to knows that that went out on police radio. The BBC reported that Building 7 had collapsed. 20 minutes before it happened. With Building 7 standing in the background, flying the reporter. And we have eye witnesses I can give you their contact information for Inside Building 7 at 9 o'clock in the morning. Before the towers have come down and witnessed massive explosions that kill large numbers of people devastated the lobby. There were pre-demolition explosions. The cover stories of exactly what happened inside the World Trade Center when that first plane went in. And of course the collapse has since then we're going to bring more of those to you now. Barry Jennings, you're on the 8th floor you work for the City Housing Department. Explain to me the moment of impact. Well me and Mr. Hesch, the Corporation Council were on the 23rd floor. I told them we got to get out of here. We started walking down the stairs. We made it to the 8th floor. Big explosion. Blue was back into the 8th floor. And I turned to Hesch. I said this is it. We're dead. We're not going to make it out of here. I took a fire extinguisher and I bust the window out. This is when this gentleman here heard my cries for help. This gentleman right here and he kept saying stand by. Somebody's coming to get you. They couldn't get to us for an hour because they couldn't find us. He thought that was it. I thought we're dead. I thought that was it. I started praying to our lives that that's it. We're going. What was it like for you? You were inside there as well. It was panamonium. I mean it was something like out of a Bruce Willis die high movie. He was there and he was crying and there was another gentleman crying. And for help we couldn't get to him. We tried to get through the building. We were lost. Both their cases. The back side was completely blown away. There was no way to access us. We couldn't get to him. And finally one of the fire department teams found him. We didn't think we were going to make it. Well certainly you got out. Many others did. Of course we don't have a number right now. Fatalities or injuries. But I want to translate a story to you that another man told me. He was near the building. He was on the lobby level near the shopping area near the promenade. The elevator door, he said to me. Blue open. And when the door is opened, there was a man on fire inside that elevator. That is the kind of tragedy we were talking about here. And where the world trade center is? There is a guy who is a Peter Michael Ketchum. He works in the company. He is an organization with help from the state. He is going to be the standard for technology and America. They are looking for the world trade center. They could fall down and do that. Peter Michael Ketchum was in this company. But he asked his organization very hard. He didn't know anything about it. He was very happy to say that it is the right thing to do. He has prepared everything very well and is worth it. I have spent much of my life in the high performance and scientific computing world. I worked at NIST for 14 years, starting in 1997. I initially joined the high performance systems and services division. And a few years later was moved into the mathematical and computational sciences division. I also was chair of our applied mathematics seminar series and hosted that for several years. Franking Member Hall and members of the committee. Thank you for this opportunity to testify on NIST role in the investigation into the collapse of the world trade center towers. I was not involved in those investigations or writing those reports, but I was certainly aware that that research study was going on. NIST role as I understand it was to investigate the collapses of the three world trade center towers. And by that I mean towers one, two, and seven. And determine why they had collapsed. The collapse of these towers was the worst building disaster in human history. Engineers, emergency responders and the nation did not anticipate and were largely unprepared for such a catastrophe. I began to look into this in July of 2016. It actually came up in a conversation with a friend that I had known for 30 years. And she mentioned something along the lines of G.D. realized there is some growing evidence that the official 9-11 narrative may not be quite what we all thought it was. I didn't do anything for about a month. I think I just let it sink in. But in the middle of August I felt very compelled to start investigating. And in a very short amount of time it became clear to me that NIST investigation of the collapse of the world trade centers was not a sincere and genuine study. And I quickly became furious. First I was furious with myself. I couldn't believe that I had not noticed this before. How could I have not noticed this for the last 15 years? And that fury then quickly transferred to NIST, my former employer, who I had always thought very highly of, and always felt that NIST did research of the highest integrity. So to see what they had done, what NIST had done with the World Trade Center investigation and report left me stunned. Good morning. I'm here to summarize the findings from our three-year study of the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. Before I tell you what we found, I'd like to tell you what we did not find. We did not find any evidence that explosives were used in the Collapse of Building 7. We ran down detailed computer simulations of blast scenarios. This size blast would have produced an incredibly loud sound that was not recorded on videos of the Collapse nor reported by witnesses. I'm not going to tell you my name is something. I'm going to get back to you. My name is not your name. I'm not your name. If you're on that building, it's coming down. What became immediately obvious to me was that there was overwhelming evidence that all three of those towers, the Collapse of Building 7, collapsed due to control demolition. And the NIST reports focused almost entirely on reasons due to fire and the associated plane crashes and jet fuel. What we found was that uncontrolled building fires caused an extraordinary event. The Collapse of World Trade Center 7 was primarily due to fires. The Collapse of Building 7 was that the most likely cause, controlled demolition, was not investigated at all. In fact, it was dismissed in one or two senses within the report. For the third time today, it was reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down. It was almost as if it were planned in motion. It just pancased. This is controlled demolition. It's a conveyer. It's a natural building. It's a 15-year-old express. This is the first time that we're aware of that a building over 15 stories tall has collapsed primarily due to fire. What is special about Building 7 and I think why it has gotten as much attention as it has is because it wasn't hit by a plane. So that cannot be used as a reason for why the building collapsed. Now it did have some fires. They weren't terribly notable fires. They were rather modest, in my opinion. And to complicate matters even more, there was an obvious foreign knowledge on the part of some people that seemed to know that this building was going to come down. That building right there, the Brown Building, the tall one, is number seven World Trade Center. It's heard several reports from several different officers now that that is the building that is going to go down next. In fact, one officer told me they're just waiting for that to come down at this point. Rescue workers pushed people away from the scene. All these stories are not compatible. You cannot have a heavily built steel frame high rise. Collapse due to modest fires. If that were the case, it would be extremely unusual for that to happen. So unusual that you could not possibly predict when or if it was going to happen. At the same time, you have people more or less waiting for it to come down. And in some cases, they had reported it had collapsed before it actually did. We're getting information now that one of the other buildings, building seven in the World Trade Center Complex, is on fire and has either collapsed or is collapsed. We've got some news just coming in, actually, that the Salomon Brothers Building in New York, right in the heart of Manhattan, has also collapsed. There were very few people in the Salomon Building when it collapsed. I mean, there were, I suppose, fears of possible further collapses around the area. That's what you would hope because this whole downtown area behind me has been completely sealed off and evacuated apart from the emergency workers. That was done by the Mayor Rudy Giuliani. The point is that building is heavily built. There would be no reason to expect it to come down. Can you confirm it was number seven that just went in? Yes, sir. And you guys knew this was coming all day. We had been, we had heard reports that the building was unstable and that eventually we need to come down on its own or it would be taken down. We knew from the beginning of our study that understanding what happened to building seven or nine eleven would be difficult. It did not fit any textbook example of that you could readily point to and say, yes, that's why the building is fell. I believe there is a quote at one point that the NIST investigators said something along the lines they were having trouble getting a handle on why building seven had collapsed. NIST is not, NIST is extremely competent. So for, to have NIST be baffled by the collapse of a building that had only modest fires and exhibits every characteristic of control demolition. If they say they were coming up empty handed and couldn't figure it out, that's not believable. NIST put forward a model for the collapse of building seven that appears to me that they were grabbing at straws. Our study has identified thermal expansion as a new phenomenon that can cause the collapse of a structure. For the first time we have shown that fire can induce a progressive collapse. Now when I was a kid and many people today are probably too young for this but there was a cartoonist called Ruben Goldberg. He drew cartoons of these machines that did a very simple thing in an incredibly complex way and it was meant to be humorous. How does this door opener up or really work? You see, waiter, places kept be on pile of dirty dishes A. Now cat be sees mouth see. Of course this is a stuffed mouth because he must be used for the next waiter. It was meant to spoof the aspect of human nature that sometimes makes things far more complicated than they need to be. And these were called Ruben Goldberg machines or Ruben Goldberg devices. And sets off bomb G opening door H very gently. The explanation that is given by NIST for the collapse of building seven sounds like a Ruben Goldberg device. You could have beams that are here that are restrained from expanding, prevented from expanding because of this column here for example. And that can buckle. And you see an example of a buckled beam right here. One column slides off of its seat on a few particular floors. And within a matter of moments there is some chain reaction like a set of dominoes that brings the building entirely down. It is possible that you could have a local failure as a result of a connection failing. But the likelihood of that failure dragging the entire building in such a fashion that all the columns would fail at the same time is an impossibility. In possibility yes. And you can see on the screen the column at the very right is column 79. And that's the column that first buckles causing the floors to come down followed by a quick succession of failures of a joining columns. And frame buildings don't do that. It doesn't happen. It's just fantasy land. Here is our structural model showing the building collapsing which matches quite well with the video of the event. Does the model that NIST produced for World Trade 7 match what we actually saw? No. We heard this sound. It sounded like a cloud thunder. It looked like there was a shock wave ripping to the building. Windows all popped it out. About a second later the box full caved out. The building followed after that. And you know I'm reminded of the old fairy tale of the emperor has no clothes. Everyone is watching the emperor go by and is being brainwashed to believe that the emperor has a beautiful set of clothes on when actually he's wearing nothing but underwear. The emperor has no clothes on. Now what we see in the NIST model first they only play the first few seconds of it. We only see a little bit of the building beginning to collapse. It is extremely atypical to build a computer model and create an animation of that model and to show only the first part of it. Why not follow through to the end? Where's the end? And what we do see doesn't match what we saw in reality. The animation for the NIST model of the collapse of World Trade Center 7 has the side sort of kinking in and top of it kind of bending funny. That is not what the video of the collapse of Building 7 shows. Building 7 came down almost straight down. This was clearly the way the structure is collapsing. This was the result of something that was planned. It's not accidental that the first tower just happened to collapse and then the second tower just happened to collapse in exactly the same way. How they accomplished this we don't know. One of the things I noticed in NIST investigation reports is this fixation on collapse initiation as if all that was required was to investigate up until the point that the collapses initiate. No, there's a lot more of a story than that. In fact that's stopping just when it's getting interesting. But NIST makes a one or two sentence summary along the lines of and then the building collapsed completely. We charged with finding out the cause of the collapse and we found what happened. I think we scientifically demonstrated what was required to initiate the collapse. Once the collapse initiated the video evidence is rather clear. It was not stopped by the floors below. So there was no calculation that we did to demonstrate that to what is clear when it went to videos. To investigate only up to collapse initiation is only doing part of the story and leaving out a great deal. Maybe that something fell off the building. It may be that something is falling. We don't know to be perfectly honest. But that is what you're looking at is the current that that's the scene at this moment at the World Trade Center. Stan Taylor from ABC's Good Morning America is down in the general vicinity of Dan. Can you tell us what has just happened? The speeder is down there down here. Full blocks north of the World Trade Center. The second building that was hit by the plane has just completely collapsed. The entire building has just collapsed as if a demolition team set off. When you see the old demolitions of the old buildings. It's down on itself and it is not there anymore. It should be it. Thanks very much. The whole side has collapsed. The whole building has collapsed. If the top of the building became unstable due to the waking of columns, one would reasonably expect the top of the building to start to lean, start to creak, connections start to break. And the top of the building would simply fall off to the side and come crashing down on the building's next door. And the rest of the tower would remain. That's what one would expect. Instead we saw something quite different. It is not reasonable to think that the weakening of some columns near the impact zone could somehow lead to an entire building collapsing entirely down on itself, symmetrically into its own footprint. With nothing left but bits of dust. It's not plausible. That's not reasonable. Watch some of the videos of the collapses. Look for several things. Look for sudden onset. When the collapse has started, they happen very fast and they complete within 10, 11, 12 seconds. Second, look at the symmetry. These buildings come straight down. But almost straight down. A symmetric damage does not lead to symmetric collapse. It is very difficult to get something to collapse symmetrically because it is the law of physics that things tend towards chaos. Collapsing symmetrically represents order, very strict order. It is not the nature of physics to gravitate towards order for no reason. It will gravitate towards chaos. It is very difficult to get a building to collapse symmetrically. Mark Loezoe has been in this family business all his life. He knows what it takes to bring a building down. The largest steel structure we've taken down, which I think is still up again, is the jail Hudson building Detroit. It took months to design it. It took months to prepare the structure for the place where the explosive charges, months. Third, look at the rubble that is left. It is not big pieces of steel, big chunks of cement. It is fine particles. Surprisingly, so little rubble. Where did all the rubble go? A concrete was hold-raised. I was down here Tuesday. It was like you were on a foreign planet. All of lower men had not just this site from river to river. It was just a dust powder. Two, three inches thick. The concrete was just that. Hold-raised. You have two 110-story office buildings. You don't find a desk. You don't find a chair. You don't find a telephone, a computer. The biggest piece of a telephone I found was half of the keypad, and it was about this big. The building collapsed to dust. And they might also look at those videos to see the explosive nature of those clasps. You can see essentially a wave of explosive demolition traveling down the building as it collapses. Explosions coming out of windows. Huge chunks of steel perimeter beams flying hundreds of feet off to the side. Steel does not fly off to the side hundreds of feet due to gravity. Gravity works vertically, not laterally. There has to be a force there pushing it to the side. Otherwise it would just fall down to the ground. Be like dropping a ball out of a window. Just fall straight down. Why did NIST issue a report that seems to do everything it can to avoid investigating the most likely cause, in this case being control demolition? Why would NIST avoid that? Why would they try to do everything they could to avoid that? The only thing I can do is make some guesses, and I emphasize the word guess. Perhaps they were coerced, perhaps they were pressured. I don't know where that coercion or pressure might have come from, but it is not typical of NIST to do anything short of excellent. NIST is extremely meticulous about their research, and by NIST's necessity they need to be. That is what they excel at. This report does not fit that pattern at all. We really have new kind of progressive collapse that we have discovered. One thing I think to understand is NIST is a really excellent place to work, and for many of the people who work there, this is a really good position, and they have a lot to lose. It is not all that hard to begin to pressure people, to make offers they can't refuse, to coerce them, and depending on the person or people involved that can be anywhere from very subtle to very overt. The best I can do is speculate that something of that type happened. We conducted this study without bias, without interference from anyone, and dedicated ourselves to do the very best job we could. In fact, I would suggest that the public should really, at this point, recognize the science is really behind what we have said. Yes, so why didn't I see it? I think the painful truth is that I was living in blindness and ignorance as to what had actually happened. I didn't give it much thought. I heard the official narrative, and like many people, I believed it. Do you know anything about the cause of the explosions that brought the two buildings down yet? Was it caused by the flames or by something else? We believe that it was caused by the after effects of the plane sitting in the buildings. We don't know if it had additional explosion after that. I am ashamed to say that, but that's the truth. Once I took a look at it, it leapt out at me. This was not a case of some subtle differences, subtle discrepancies, or differences of scientific opinion that needed further investigation. This was a glaring, glaring clear cut. Getting behind the car. Don't have oxygen. I think what has allowed the official story to stand for this long is a common sense. A combination of several things. One is complacency. Another one is fear. And the third is ignorance. There are probably many people that just have not looked at it, don't understand it. They just simply are not aware. In other cases it's complacency. They have a sense of what might be going on, but they're maybe not too interested in putting the effort into finding out. And there could be others that have a very strong sense of what they think is going on, but they are gripped in fear, paralyzed in fear. The reason that I have spoken out about this is very simple. I spoke out because I believed it was the right thing to do. I have no other motive. It would be nice at this point if someone who is currently a missed employee would also speak out, but that is up to each individual there to decide. What I am seeing is that with respect to the World Trade Center classes, the official narrative is beginning to unravel. I think there is a good chance that that unraveling will continue and perhaps accelerate, but it could be highly volatile. If it does continue to unravel, I think there could be some very painful revelations that will be very hard for our country to accept. Our war on terror begins without cotta, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated. And I don't in any way make light of that. It could be very painful. Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other, we have ever seen. But the wounds of 9-11 have remained unhealed for too long, and they are festering and rotting and they are infected. When you have a wound on the body, one of the first things you do is you wash it out with hot soapy water, and then you bandage it up. And yet, it hurts. It hurts while you are washing it. It stinks. It is a sharp pain, but you get the bandage on, and the pain starts to die down. A few hours passed down to just a sornous. My point is that truth is the hot, sudsy water, with which we wash out the wounds of 9-11, so that they can begin true healing. The first thing you do is you wash out the wounds of 9-11, and then you wash out the wounds of 9-11, so that they can begin true healing. And then you wash out the wounds of 9-11, so that they can begin true healing. The first thing you do is you wash out the wounds of 9-11, so that they can begin true healing. And then you wash out the wounds of 9-11, so that they can begin true healing. The first thing you do is you wash out the wounds of 9-11, so that they can begin true healing. And then you wash out the wounds of 9-11, so that they can begin true healing. The first thing you do is you wash out the wounds of 9-11, so that they can begin true healing. And then you wash out the wounds of 9-11, so that they can begin true healing.