NEW - WHAT IS IN THE VACCINES - DR. CARRIE MADEJ

Video Transcript:

Hi everyone, this is Marym Hanein, investigative journalist, functional medicine consultant, and I'm here again with Dr. Carrie Madei. I'm going to hang up this phone, and then I'm going to show these people who she don't want to see. What can you tell us about the Pfizer vaccine? Okay. So in the beginning, when we had lots of different news releases coming out, we were getting different temperatures coming back at what they needed. But finally, we're looking at the UK. They have their protocol or their instruction manual out for Pfizer. And it says negative 60 to negative 80 degrees Celsius. And then also there is a military clip that is an instruction manual for people in the military because they will deploy the vaccine. And it shows, if you don't have it, I'll send it to you. It shows how to distribute this vaccine, how to keep it frozen. But they're using even colder temperatures than negative 80 degrees for this Pfizer vaccine. So we're talking about colder than the North and the South Pole. We're talking about cryo, so in essence, what's happening is cryo freezing. Yeah. Okay. This is on a whole different ballgame now. Yeah. They are using cryo freezing. And you know, so in another excerpt that Pfizer is telling us is, okay, we could send out these briefcases, these military briefcases. And they would hold like, let's say, a thousand doses inside these little tiny crushed dry ice. And the case will last only five days. And it can only be opened up two times a day for two to three minutes. Anything over three minutes done. We got to throw the whole stuff out, right? I'm laughing because I've worked in the medical field. Good luck. Good luck distributing something like that to all these areas. And anyone else I know in the medical field, we're all laughing. There's just no way. And I'm also saying, how are you getting your 45,000 research subjects with this kind of qualifications for the vaccine to be distributed to these research subjects? I'm calling bullshit because that's a thousand to four thousand centers. I don't believe it one bit. So I am very, I'm calling bullshit. I want to know how this is happening. The whole public should be doing this. Other scientists and physicians, we shouldn't just be believing them because we're talking about something that is so, okay, people in the medical industry aren't used to doing this. Okay. I'm sure the military is only handful that are used to doing this. Right? The world is this happening. We're cryophreasing something for gosh sake to put into people. Okay. So in the ingredients, when you read, there's sucrose, sugar, but that is essential for something that's being cryophrosened when you're thawing it. Because if you don't have it in there, there's a problem with destabilization once it's thawed. Okay. So there's another clue that yes, they are cryophreasing something. And going into the cryophreasing, Moderna is stating it does not need to cryophrease. It's modified messenger RNA. So the only reason that Pfizer is giving us for these ultra crazy cryophreasing temperatures is that oh, we're just using the messenger RNA guys. That's what we have to do. That's what science has to do. That is completely false. So already that's another lie. Okay. So you can look on thermo Fisher.com and you and I can make our own little modified messenger RNA. We can order our own human clonal cells, the aborted fetal cells that have been cloned. We can order them. We can order the mice cells and we can order the messenger RNA. Look it up on thermo. Just like you can buy the Zika. Yeah. And then you just click on the boxes. Pretty inexpensive. Do it in your kitchen. And then there's a protocol on the protocol. I looked on it. It says refrigeration. There's nothing about ultra freezing. Okay, let's say longer term storage, but still not cryophreasing. Okay. So they're already lying. This should raise every red front. What is going on? Explosive or something alive needs to stay in stasis. This reminds me of an alien's, a gourmet weaver kind of movie. What are they injecting? I mean, you got to laugh at some point because you'll go crazy, right? It's not a marketing. It's not like a marketing stick or like a reason to bring up cells of dry ice or what. What's the reason? I would like you to see. If you have not seen that in the author clip, I will send it to you. Yeah, send it to me. I don't know. It's pretty serious stuff. And they do mention that they could use something they've used for the now defunct Ebola virus or vaccine, which they're using these big tubes with a jet feel to cool. Yeah. Without enough. I mean, I hope that the person using their brain will say, there's something not right about injecting that into a body. Okay. Yeah. I do know this that something's probably being, it's active, biologically active, bio nanoactive, right? It has to stay in stasis because it's unpredictable. That's very dangerous. The other thing is hydrogel does need to be very cold to be pushed through a syringe. Okay. So there's the only recently did they develop a type of hydrogel that there was a problem pushing it through the syringe and staying stable in a human's body. So I might tea not that long ago came up with this structure where if you cooled it very cold, then you brought up to room temperature, only temper, you know, very short time. Yeah. And it's being pushed through the syringe. It's a mechanical stress. It's okay. So with the fangs, well, they had to see the fangs are actually the perfect way to get it in the body. I think that they realize people weren't going to buy that. So the syringe that people are used to syringe, right? So they'll take this syringe, but now you have to do a different formulation. It's not as easy. So how do you change something from liquid to solid form? Because it's actually kind of solid jelly form in the body. Well, they came up with this solution that it's a temperature sensitive hydrogeo. So ultra cold, it can stay in a liquefied state. Now, when you bring it up to the thawing temperature, let's say, once it's thought, you only have so much time. I have the article if you want to read that. And then once in this syringe, you have, let's say, six hours. I might be off on those many hours, but anyway, something like that. You put it in the body. It hits that 37 degrees Celsius. And then it starts to go back to its functioning state, which should form scaffolding kind of thing inside the body. And then it's very long term and durable. OK, so that is another reason that we would need that extreme change of temperatures. I just don't think they still with that. I don't think they need the cryo freezing. Like I said, we're all guessing at this point. But I could tell you that what the reasons the drug company are giving us is completely false. So if they are already giving us those reasons and they are false, we should stop everything right now in our tracks, right? Absolutely. That's just the cryo freezing part. I mean, I didn't get to all the other things. Right. So before we move on, just one, you mentioned the sugar. My understanding is that we're not told what the inactive ingredients are of this Pfizer vaccine. So I'll send it out. The UK does have it because they're going to start giving it what in five or six days. So I have the UK the UK protocol on the ingredients. Now, even with their ingredients, they won't tell us the percentages, which is very important. But I can send you that. But they did give us sucrose, potassium chloride, sodium chloride, like a sodium phosphate, di-phasic blend, two different hydrogell, like moieties that I'm not familiar with. I do have to research those more, but two. One of them does have polyethylene glycol, which 70% of the population is allergic to, which could be an itch to anaphylactic shock. Is that a plastic dick? It's a very dangerous chemical preservative. It's a jet-fuelish type of thing. Yeah. Is that the adjuvants? Have they mentioned? That is the, okay. So why they're using those two moieties, those nano-lipped particles? That's the nanotechnology. Okay. Why they're, their excuse for using that is that it will prevent the modified messenger RNA from degrading because our body is smart. It'll know it's synthetic and it will attack it and take rid of it, right? Because that's a good human body. Right. So to prevent our body from doing what it's supposed to do, they're going to put this nanotechnology that will prevent the degradation of the synthetic modified RNA. That's their reasoning. But it also has other functions. It does many other things. So part of it, they have the sodium phosphate diaphasic. It's, it can act as an anti-coagulant because you can start clotting. There's known to be clots thrombosis, which is like a stroke, right? Yes, yes, yes. Okay. Which can present as dementia or memory loss and all the other kinds of things. So there's a little bit of an anti-clotting thing, but how does that work long term? No one's answering that question. No one. No, nobody knows. Okay. We also know that when you're using KCL and sodium chloride, so potassium chloride and sodium chloride, they can act for paramagnetic particles as well as kels or the, um, the voltage gated channels. What those are really meaning is that that's very important for the biosensors. So these, what I'm saying is they're not giving us all the active ingredients, but what I'm seeing is we have the setup for the biosensors in the body. The so far, the information that they're giving us is confirmation that these biosensors will be introduced into the body. Okay. And then later, at a later time, with this, if they inject, what they're saying, they're injecting, there can be biosensors with this particular vaccine, this first vaccine given out. Yes. Also with nanotechnology, like one of the reasons, for instance, I didn't personally make a nano-silver was that some of the critique was you don't, you cannot track where the nano will go. So is that, is that correct? That the nano could find itself near an organ or? Yes and no. Some of the hydro gels have an affinity. For instance, why they love the hydro gel and dark botan military is it has an affinity for the nervous system, your nerves, your brain. It actually works really well with the tissue. The body doesn't reject it most of the time. It becomes one with your brain and nervous tissue. And this is why it works really well with biosensing. So this is, if you look at the adjuvants, the inactive, they call them inactive ingredients. Yeah, and very active. So they, they look at the whole thing. It's a perfect setup for putting the biosensors in. And what they're not telling you is that, I only knew this from a court case that I read about. There's a court case from a LELL, I think their name is. They formed the, it's competing with luciferase so that bioluminescence enzyme. And so there's another one called neon green. And they are supposedly even better than luciferase. And there's another company that has that. They have a patent on it. Well, both Pfizer and I believe Moderna was using neon green with bare vaccines. So this is an evidence of using a bioluminescent quality. Whether or not this is passed down into this, they're not, they're not being honest. But anyway, I only knew about this. They never mentioned it in any of their articles. But at court cases said they, they are using it in this vaccine. A point. Okay. So my point to you is, why are we finding an ingredient out from a court case? Court case, yeah. About patent rights. And why is it not being listed anywhere near in their research protocols or their development? Or is this, I mean, here, there's another issue I'm bringing up that we are not being told the truth on the grandest scale. One thing other about the Pfizer, we know that there is a syncyton protein that it will code for, which is, it has the possible, so if it's coding for that, it means the body will form antibodies against it. Well, it happens to be in our placentas. So imagine that. So that means that vaccine like the tetanus vaccine can attack an early pregnancy. Or maybe even maybe it's midterm, who knows? I mean, obviously, we'll be the experiment. Again, this will affect fertility. Yeah, I wanted to ask you get into fertility again, which seems to be, so we know the proteins there. So yes, they can attack a placenta, meaning that would not be a viable pregnancy or if it was being viable, it would really affect the blood circulation or who knows what, right? For the baby. But we also know that somewhere in this genome, there's also the chromosome eight, or part of the chromosome eight, which is fertility and intelligence. So that's another whammy on us. And this is one of my biggest things that I am screaming to everybody. Is that if you look on the protocol for the research for Pfizer, they give you, you want to know what they're coding for because we're coding something like software, right? Yeah. They say, don't worry, guys. You won't get sick because we're only coding for that little spike protein. That's all. Not through the whole virus. Well, then why in your research protocol, you give the genomic a session number. That means that's telling us what is the genomic code? And they'll, in question, you don't want to put the whole code. You just put a shortened abbreviated number. Okay, take that abbreviated number. Look at the genomic bank and wait a minute. It's for the entire virus. Right. So if it's for the entire virus, Pfizer is saying they're using the entire virus's code. So what that means, unless they may have a stake, your body will start producing the entire infection in your body. Yeah. You will then produce this infection. Either they made a mistake in their protocol or they really are going to be those people will be producing the entire infection. Either way, again, we should rofizer out right now. You cannot make a mistake like that or will they really be giving us a virus? I have a suspicion that that's the case because or Chris Johnson and the prime minister of Australia and many new sources have actually said the distribution of the virus. Right. I mean, so many references. I don't think that's by mistake. Many times, I think they're Freudian slips of the Therese slips, right? Okay, so now we've got possibly you're producing an entire virus inside of you. That's everybody's different. Some people produce a little. Some a lot. We've got 70% of the population going to have allergic reactions to the polyethylene glycol. We have something that is biologically active on some degree. It's cryophrosin. We've got the introduction of nanotechnology that is so that has a remedy. Obviously, we have we have proof or evidence or evidence that there is but there are biosensors being introduced into the body. We also have proof that they're going to be coding for or since itin but which happens to be the placenta that's fertility of people. We also know that part of the code actually has HIV-1 subunits, although they will disagree with that but we know that's likely. Okay. We also know that, you know, chromosome 8 happens to be involved there. I mean, so many red flags do your need. Yeah. It's unbelievable. When you say that they're introducing the whole virus, can we also clarify that this arguably is never been isolated and it's synthetic. The virus genome that they've showed us. Can you can you yes, thank you for bringing that up. So yes, the virus that they're telling us that's infecting us has never been isolated. The UK, Canada, the CDC have all admitted that we have never isolated it. If you look at any of these research papers that claim they have, Dr. Kaufman did a really good job explaining that going through all the research papers. It shows that even by the modified criteria of Koch's postulates, which is the river's criteria, all of them fail. All of them failed every one of the criteria. Okay. So meaning now one entity anywhere in the world that we know of has ever isolated this virus as the infectious agent in us ever. We should. That's just so important. No, it's really important. But now people tell me well, it doesn't exist. So that code doesn't exist. No, there is a code, right? There's a code and that frightens me because there's definitely a code that they say they want to inject into you or me or anybody else. I think that code is real. What in the world is that? You can get sick from that. I mean, if there's, I tell people, I do believe in the terrain theory. I do believe our bodies are amazing. And I give an example that if you could swipe your environment, your skin, anything around you, put it under the microscope, you would be so shocked. We're teaming with life everywhere. It would gross you out, but it's good because this is the homeostasis of life. We all, it's symbiosis in a homeostatic and it's balanced. It's fine. Bacteria are good. You know, and I mean, the only thing we can disagree on maybe is the viruses, are they normal or not? But, you know, there's parasites, there's fungus. Yes.