WEF Covid 19 Simulation - Urgent Action On International Level (1)

Video Transcript:

The World Health Organization website, a current coronavirus disease, COVID-19 training simulation exercise. Why are they running a simulation in parallel with a global pandemic? If there's a global pandemic, they don't need to run a simulation at the same time. We've got a long track record of this. 7-7, there was a simulation running, a precise simulation of the exact same event. This is what they do. Well, they run simulations. The simulations are sold by the media as real events. That's been the pattern since I'm afraid to say guys the moon landing. I know it's going to get me some thumbs down by people who are still convinced we went to the moon, but we didn't. I did do a video that got 1.7 million views, actually 2.25 million views before sustained pressure to bring it down. And you know, I know all about it. We didn't go. I'll do a video about it and prove it. It was a simulation. It was a simulation moon landed. And this is a simulation COVID-19 disease. I mean, why are they running a simulation? Come on, guys, we've got a global pandemic, yeah? So why are they needing to hear an urban COVID-19 semi-extradiscretical issues? Well, I've got a pandemic doing infectious disease. Here it is PowerPoint, President Supply, Speaker, and Debrun. Our participants guide and a facilitators guide to explain what is expected from different people involved in the preparation and running of the exercise. Okay, so you know, they're going to be running a simulation alongside a global pandemic. That's garbage. Now, if you want more proof that it's a simulation exercise, just have a look at this. I'll put this in the way back, machine. This is mind-blowing. This is on the street. I've got access to the strategic intelligence. You've got a login and jump for a few hoops and stuff, but then you get this infographic that is mind-blowing. It is tentacles, all these little tentacles here, and there's layers upon layers upon layers. You click on one of these and you go through two more tentacles, hundreds of them, and then more tentacles, and then more tentacles. They've got everything was planned out, everything. You have a look at some of these here. I'll give you a log in if you want. You can go and have a look at your global governance. You click on global governance, and that'll open up a whole new everything's on here, 5G. You know, how they're going to change the law and lock us all down. Everything was pre-planed. This thing here, which has got layers upon layers upon layers upon layers of stuff, and it covers everything, is all the, as all been pre-planned in advance to, I mean, COVID-19 is the Trojan Horse for this big, globalistic gender, this big, globalist plan, is going to end up with us all being microchipped, and they've got everything here covered. Now, I'll put this into the way that machine, because something like this, with all these layers and all these, I mean, this is a big project. This is the kind of project I would have thought that would take, you know, maybe six months or something to put together, it's unbelievably sophisticated. The way they've got all this information all wrapped around COVID-19. According to the way back machine, yeah, March the 15th. This was live, March the 15th. Now, March the 15th, people were still wondering whether this COVID-19 was anything, you know, there was still a lot of debate about whether it was serious, and whether it was going to, I mean, we didn't have to lock that in until the 26th, was it? 26th. So, they already had this website up with their big global governance project, all centered around this alleged pandemic, and they've got it all suspoused, and all these tentacles in place, and everything, and it's a big project here, you know, by March the 15th, you know, and like I said, something like this is going to take ages to do, and back in January and December, you know, no one knew that this was, I mean, don't forget Boris didn't even bother closing the airport, so he still hasn't, he just proves the whole thing, a complete garbage, because if we were serious about stopping an pandemic, we'd definitely be stopping flights coming in, or at least, you know, testing the people that were coming in. Okay, so this is mind blowing, if you want to have a look at this, it's everything was all pre-planned here, layers and layers and layers, if we click on aging, for example, it's pretty disturbing, and this is going to lead on to, well, I want to take you next. Okay, so, elder, aging, and elder care giving, because one thing I didn't tell you, and I'm, I'm meaning to tell you, is about, you know, quite a few months ago, on Redwood's blog, a load of political types turned up, and they started pushing this idea that old age people were the problem, you know, and we needed to do something drastic about it, and I was shocked that John was even letting these posts through moderation, but not only was he letting them through moderation, but he was seemingly given them, a platform to promote this idea that the older the problem, and all his regulars were taking this, you know, taking it all seriously, I was really shocked, you can get your society surely by, how they treat their elderly folk. Anyway, listen to this, it's horrible, horrible. Okay, an aging population, now I didn't realize, according to the global elite, the old people are the problem, as you'll see when I read you this, you know, they're the problem to global governance, they're the problem to the economy, I mean, they're not a problem, they're not a problem. Okay, this is what it says, as older population expand faster than younger population, it is disrupting traditional social structures where younger family members have had primary responsibility for caring for their elders, and creating more dependence on hospitals and institutions. Okay, problems, problems, problems, always problems, the older, the older are problem now, according to these global eliteists, the gap between the need for elder care, given an existing supply is widened, by 26 days, there will be only one caregiver in Europe for every 51 people aged 80 or older, according to European Commission projections here, they've done all their research, they know that the older a major problem, and well, let me just read on as, elder care given needs increase, a so-called caring economy is emerging, they hate this caring economy. It is having a significant, this is why, it is having a significant impact on the workforce as it leads to increased absenteeism and decreased productivity, and it hinders gender parity efforts by having a disproportionately negative effect on female employers, as women make up the majority of elder care, it was all first of all, why is that negative? Why is caring for old people so negative? Maybe these women like caring for old people, some people do, they actually do care for old people, and they might actually like it. So according to this, it's negative, it's having a negative effect on female employers, as women make up the majority of elder care, given as if that's the worst job ever, they could be working in a fishing chip shop or something, that's even worse, surely. Looking after the elderly is not a negative thing, but according to these globalists here, on this creepy, horrible, COVID-19 site, it is, okay? Yeah. Oh yeah, yeah, look, and slows overall economic growth. So, old people are slowing economic growth, working caregivers must often take time off, pass up promotion, or leave the workforce altogether. Oh, it's terrible, you know, I mean, you can tell the kind of people that wrote this. Meanwhile, you know, really selfish. Meanwhile, employers are losing valuable talent. Oh, terrible. And greater pressure is being placed on social systems. Other impacts, decreased earnings and purchasing power, and negative effects on caregivers' health and wellbeing. Well, what about the old people? Okay, so the caregivers' health and wellbeing, which in turn further drives up overall healthcare, across according to the global coalition of aggregates, 2006 to report the value of healthcare. The need to provision quality care for the elderly is already disrupting national economies. Okay, so it's a disaster. The elderly are now a disaster. They're disrupting the global system. Countries in Europe and North America, as well as Japan and North Korea are looking to implement significant reforms, they're looking to implement significant reforms, significant reforms in order to meet the need of aging populations. Okay, what are these significant reforms? It's not anything to do with, you know, getting them to sign, do not resuscitate all these in old people's homes or anything is it? Because that is what's happening at the moment all over the world. In addition, as emerging economies, such as Brazil, China, Turkey, and South Africa grow older, at a faster rate than they become wealthier, the socio-economic impacts of elderly care in those countries could be particularly devastating, devastating. Okay, the elderly are now devastating to everyone else. New solutions are essential, new solutions are essential. I don't like this at all. Greater prominence for the home care industry, for example, could help alleviate the impact of health and social care costs on public budgets. The industry in turn can spare economic growth and provide employment opportunities for women and minorities, according to, so what's important here is women and minorities, but not the elderly. Have you noticed that? According to caring in America, a 2000-year report from the Para Professional Health Co Institute in addition to, so obviously, adapt to the new realities of aging, incentive for saving for a long-term care, more training in education for elder caregivers, and an application of innovative technology will be critical, so they're going to try to get people to save for their own, basically, for their own health care. Okay, that was horrible. Don't you agree? That was absolutely disgusting from start to finish. That's discrimination, that is. If they wrote that against minorities or against women or against gays, it would be everyone would be going crazy. But because it's old people, all that entire article, problem, devastation, you know, this is all describing old people who's disgusting. Okay, so this is the COVID-19 Action Plan and the big project for global governance. I mean, this is just more of a... You've got to have a look at this. It's just absolutely not layers upon layers upon layers of stuff. If we click on any of these, it'll open up another spider's web of tentacles. See? Just mind blowing. Every single one opens up another spider's web of tentacles. Now, you cannot tell me, I couldn't do the way I actually matched the 12th, this was up. You cannot tell me that the developers took that up in a couple of... I mean, even on March the 12th, you couldn't have predicted that COVID-19 was going to be doing all these things. All these things, the COVID-19 is the... you know, the Trojan Horse here, everything links off from that and you just go into networks upon networks upon networks of pre-planned action on the back of this simulation. Okay, so we've just learnt there that the elderly are being screwed over, oh, they hate the elderly. Now, let's have a look at this, okay? This is where we get... So I guess we're really worried. Okay, so first of all, cancer rates before we get into the old people. There's been a 2007... This is in the UK, so I'm not sure what it is in America. Okay? 2,700 fewer people are being diagnosed every week, cancer research says. Okay, so that's 2,700 people with cancer that are not being diagnosed per week. Okay, now imagine what's... That's not going to show up on the ONS stats on week 14. Is it? Them deaths. Let's say half of those die now, because they haven't been diagnosed and they've got cancer. Let's say half of those die per week. That's what, you know, 1,400 or something. Not going to show up on the ONS stats, you know, for maybe six months, but they're going to show up. Okay, so absolutely disastrous. And it gets worse and much, much, much worse. Yeah, here, the financial times admitting that we've got 11,000. Here we go. Look, 24%. The ONS said on Tuesday, it had asked public health thinking to investigate why care home deaths were rising so sharply. Okay, this is what's happening now. Yeah, 24% of deaths normally occur in care homes in the UK. The analysis suggests that just some of the 11,000 more people than normal have died in residential care since the start of the outbreak. And remember, this is not COVID-19. Okay. I mean, I don't need to say, I don't need to add anything to that. 11,000 people more since the outbreak of died in residential care homes. And this is the UK, remember? So this is happening globally. And I believe it is. I've got information that some of the sort of things happening in Spain. Yeah, the lockdown is killing people too. So this article here in Spocked, this is mind blowing what you're just about to, what I'm just about to tell you, hospital admissions are down 100,000. This is in the UK, 100,000 per week, 100,000 people per week are not going to the hospital. And this is because the hospitals still largely empty. And the media showing crying doctors and nurses say they can't cope. That's stopping people going to hospital. Even people with heart attacks, the ambulance people are saying they're turning up and the people are already dead because they're refusing to phone 999 because they've been told that the hospitals are just absolutely snowed under and they can't cope. So it's just a disaster. It's just a mind blowing disaster. I mean, you just read this. I'll put the links below. The genocide of elderly. And the thing is the propaganda is, and the government people will come and they will watch too much TV and they will say that, you know, I don't care for the elderly. That's what they'll say. I'll say you don't care for the elderly. And yet they haven't got a clue what's really happening. You know, it's just all well, the unallwellian opposite. So they think we're saving the elderly and the truth is, figures are extraordinary. In week 14, they were close to 106,000 emergency missions to English hospitals. In week 14 of this year, there are around 60,000, okay, 60,000. So that's the difference of 100,000, 100,000 in a week. That's what's happening. 100,000, okay, this is why we're getting massive excess deaths showing up on the ONS stats. For week 14 and week 15. Absolutely mind blown. Okay, I've got more redwood by the way. This is me. He's put me at the bottom because he agrees with it. There are only two explanations for the extra deaths on the ONS stats. One. Someone has been collecting deaths and registering them all at one time to make it look like there's a tiny, to make it look like there's a tiny pandemic. The ONS seems to allow this. Or two, the lockdown is killing far more than this alleged virus. Well, like I said, John puts his favorite post at the bottom. He's put it at the bottom again there making that, because he knows, he knows that it's dead. But now the ONS stats are concerned. Let's just nip this in the bud once and for all. Something is very wrong with the ONS stats. Five year average all deaths. So we've got a genocide going on here, but caused by the lockdown. As far as this influenza line is concerned, we've got to sort this out once and for all. This is what it looks like. And this is a five year average on the ONS. So the ONS have been consistently lying about their influenza and pneumonia stats. Because no one, no other country stats looks anything like that. I've spent a bit of time looking into it. Look, this is America. A center of disease control. It peaks February, massive peak in February. And a march is still quite hot. Yeah, a week. Here we are, a little week 10. We've got a massive peak, week 12. Still week 13, week 14. Look at this. Okay, this is what an influenza chart should look like. Should look like that or like that. Okay, but the ONS for some inexplicable reason just goes up a little bit in January. And then goes slowly down all the way. I don't know what the hell's going on there because that is just not right at all. Yeah, and again, turning to event 201. Just reading what they've put here basically the next event 201. So the next event of the pandemic will not only cause great illness. I love the way this is like a prophecy. I mean, just let me just point out what they're putting. The next event of the pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life, but could also trigger major cascading economic and social societal consequences that could contribute greatly to a global impact and suffering. Yeah. So the politicians have basically done exactly that. They've created a cascading economic and societal consequences that could have contributed greatly to a global impact and suffering. So how come event 201 managed to predict this chaos so perfectly? I mean, they knew perfectly well that the major impact would be the economic disaster caused off the back of it by politicians and the media just going nuts. Yeah, so you have an event 201 that coincides pretty much with the pandemic start of the pandemic. Yeah, and you predict perfectly that that's going to trigger a major cascading economic disaster. Yeah. So what was your point? What was the point of event 201? If that is exactly what happened, you know, they predicted that there would be a major economic disaster. And, you know, and there was. You know, it's like a prophecy, isn't it? That's what it is. Because the whole thing was pretty planned. Thousands missing out on diet. Yeah, 2700 a week. Absolutely mind blowing. So we've got to stop it. We've got to stop it.