Mass Mental Programming Madness

Video Transcript:

MK Ultra was the cold name for the CIA Mind Control Research Program that began in the 1950s. The project involved the use of drugs and electronic signals to alter brain function A. It was first brought to public attention by the UPS Congress. The Church Committee and the Presidential Commission. The Rockefeller Commission, most of the MK Ultra records were deliberately destroyed in 1972 by order of the director at the time Richard Helms. It's therefore impossible to have a complete understanding of the more than 150 individually funded research projects sponsored by MK Ultra and related to CIA programs. Discovered during the 1975 congressional hearing, when it was found the CIA was spending over $1 billion per year adjusted for inflation and grides to America's news outlets in exchange for them acting as covert mouthpieces for the government. They were given a free hand and all the resources they desired in order to implement this. The CIA deep state has had the age to recruit, develop and expand operations since then. The gentleman in the elevator now is a cannon star. These folks who are entering the man with a white shirt, a lady with a trench coat and subsequently one other member of our staff will face the rear. And you'll see how this man in the trench bow... It tries to maintain his individuality, but a little by little... It looks at his wife, but he's really making him excuse for turning just a little bit more... Now we try it once again. Here's the candid subject. Here comes the candid camera staff. Hurry up and at least. And this man has a partly good in group. Now, here's a fella with his hat on in the elevator. First he makes a full turn to the rear and Charlie closes the door. A moment later, we open the door, everybody's changed positions. Now we'll see if we can use group pressure for some good. Now, in a moment, Charlie's single, everybody transports. They take off their masks. And now, do you think we can reverse the procedure? Yes. Well, an experiment is not a public opinion poll. It examines behavior under the pressure of social forces as the experiment of Solomon Ash reveals. The experiment you'll be taking part in today involves the perception of lengths of lines. As you can see here, I have a number of cards. And on each card, there are several lines. Your task is a very simple one. You're to look at the line on the left and determine which of the three lines on the right is equal to it in length. All right, we'll proceed in this order. You'll give your answer. Only rule of people in the group is a real subject or a fifth person with a white t-shirt. The others are Confederates of the experimenter and have been told to get wrong answers on some of the trials. The experiment begins on eventfully as subjects give their judgments. Two, two, two, three, three, three. Well, on the third trial, something happens. Two, two, two. The subject denies the evidence of his own eyes and leads to group influence. Ash found subjects went along with the group on 37% of the critical trials. When you found through interviews that they went along with the group for different reasons. What? One, they must be right. Therefore, them and one of me? One. This subject's yielding is based on a destruction of his judgment. He genuinely believes that the group is correct. One. One. One. Two. One. Two. Two. Two. I knew that wrong. What should I make, please? Two. In this case, the subject knows he is right but goes along to avoid the discomfort of disagreement with the group. Here, the distortion is at the level of his response. Two. Two. Two. In the previous experiment, the naive subject still amorn against the group. In this variation, Ash gave the naive subject a partner. Here, seated in the third position, who also gives the correct response. One. One. Two. One. Two. Will a partner yield him drops to only 5% of the critical trials compared to 37% without a partner. Although subjects report warmth and good feeling toward the partner, they typically deny that he played a role in their own independence. The partnership variation shows that much of the power of the group came not merely from its numbers, but from the unanimity of its opposition. One that unanimity is punctured that group's power is greatly reduced. Sometimes we go along with a group because what they say convinces us they are right. This is called informational conformity. But sometimes we can form because we are apprehensive that the group will disapprove if we are deviant. This is called normative conformity. The strength of the normative factor is shown in a motor variation carried out by Ash. In this variation, the subject is told that because he had arrived late, you would have to write his answers. Subjects in this private response experiment are exposed to the same amount of misleading information as other subjects, but they are immune from impossible criticism by the group. One. One. One. One. One. And this enormously reduces the pressure to conform. Conformity drops by two-thirds. Ash's experiment is a classic. It reveals how people will deny what they see and submit to group pressure. It allows us not only to observe conformity, but to study the conditions that increase or reduce its occurrence. There we go. A decade earlier, psychologists Stanley Milgram had also looked at how we respond to authority. In order to understand how people were induced to obey unjust regimes, and participate in atrocities such as the Holocaust, he set up an experiment. Volunteers were told they were taking part in scientific research to improve memory. You open those and tell me which it was worth with. This teacher learned. Separated by a screen, the teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock when the author was incorrect. He was told to increase the voltage with each raw monster. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would ask the learner questions in a way that he missed out on a leopard shock. The teacher would have committing acts against their conscience as the Germans have been under the Nazis. In the 1970s, we had becoming ice age. It was plastered all over the media. It was a very powerful influence by this time. Warnings of the coming disaster filled the airwaves. This was echoed by print media as well as our schools and other institutions. Not all the experts agreed of course. Just the ones who got the airtime. But then the planet started to warm up. It was like acid rain and the hole in the ozone layer fizzled out fairly quickly but they distracted the masses long enough to flip the script. We now had run away global warming instead of an ice age. It was plastered all over the media which had developed greatly by this time. It was echoed by print media which would increase and move online over time. And it was quickly entrenched in all of our institutions. It was quickly disagreed with the official media narrative where increasingly smeared and censored. Graded the world's spell of the so-called proven science of global warming and it became impossible to cover up the fact that the planet was no longer warming. The global warming tide became problematic. It was slowly phased out over time and favor of climate change. Now any change in the climate is reason for panic and makes sacrifice to deployment buds. For some of us anyway, that was the long game, research and development. They would use what they learned for the short game. That would come next. The fear-mongering was non-stop. People were cat isolated. People were the humanized. People were controlled. People were made compliant. It takes censored anyone who failed to follow the narrative. Only approved voices were alive. Only the approved experts. Experts who may have had questionable backgrounds, questionable connections. All part of the programming. Not everyone was taken in, of course. But enough to keep restrictions in place for over two years. Global control of the media is almost complete. You may believe there are many different voices in the mainstream media, but there is actually one voice open for many outlets. In fake news. In the general control control, there is an open evil play and this is extremely dangerous toward democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous toward democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. They fed us the same kind of joint science with COVID that they have for decades with their climate hysteria. The same data manipulation. The same lies and smears and censorship. This is the final goal. The extermination of most of the human race and the complete subjugation of those will remain. It's been a goal for several decades now. It's what they've been building for. The technology now makes it possible. They've...