WHISTLEBLOWER Google Working For China to Undermine America

Video Transcript:

Now, many of you will remember that this past couple of months ago, there was a big, big story out of Project Barrett House, James O'Keefe's organization of Google Whistleblower, someone who is a pretty senior at Google who decided to come public with claims about election manipulation that was going on in political bias, it was going on at Google, and all sorts of claims about some of the stuff that was happening, what he called dark and deferious activities going on within the company. To try to, as he said, tamper with the elections and try to overthrow essentially the elected and government of the United States, meaning the elected government that elected Donald Trump. Now, I am delighted to welcome on this show that whistleblower Zachary Vorhees, very brave man who's upended his life to come and sound the alarm on all of what Google is up to. Zachary, welcome to Bright Bart News Tonight. It's a pleasure to be here. Thank you for inviting me on the show. You know, we all saw your interviews with James O'Keefe and you know, remind our listeners though again, take us back to some of the revelations that you won't felt most keenly about it. And actually, let's start this here. Tell all the listeners about what you were doing at Google, what was your job at Google, and why you decided to come forward at this particular time when you did. Yeah, sure. So, I've been working at Google for eight and a half years, the last three years I've been working at their YouTube division, which is fully owned by Google. I was a senior software engineer and I was making 260,000 a year when I decided to resign. The reason why I decided to resign was because of Google's censorship program that they had, which was called Machine Learning Awareness. This was a project that was sort of softly disclosed to the public, but it was kind of like an open secret that was just being implemented in Google search, YouTube, and Google News. And then after several rounds of censorship in YouTube and Google search, I decided that there was not going to be a point where Google would back off, they would keep on, you know, pushing the limits. And so after a huge censorship round in YouTube and I think it was April or May, I decided that it was an intolerable situation. So I resigned from the company. I came to Project Grottoff and I disclosed 950 pages of Google's censorship system called Machine Learning Journal. And I tell us about this, you know, why this was censorship? What kind of censorship was going on here with this machine learning? Who were they targeting and was it unfair? I mean, they will say, Google's answer will be like, we are just cleaning up, you know, or either they'll say that there is no type of interference with no blacklisting or censorship or they'll just say, when we were cleaning up bad stuff for something, I mean, you've heard all the, you know, the doublespeak they have, but what was going on with this? What was the censoring? Right. So first off, machine learning is the type of AI that takes training data and then generates patterns that can be used to classify additional data. And so in order to understand machine learning fairness, what we first have to understand is what is algorithmic unfairness in terms of our Google thinks? Well, in their internal documents, Google states an example, and this example is, suppose that someone is searching for the keyword, TDO, if the Google results come back and even if most of them reflect, you know, that it's a nail as the PEO, and even if these results reflect objective reality, this could still be considered algorithmically unfair and justified correction via product intervention. And so the only internal documents that we'll have available to all four timing for you, I was able to see that this was the definition of unfair, which was objective reality itself. So when Google goes and says, you don't have bias in our search results, they mean a very particular version of bias, right? They think objective reality is itself bias. And so they're trying to correct it in order to, and this is where words create a fair and more affordable date. So it really is, so Zach is recommending and thanks for coming on and really appreciate you joining us. So essentially what they're affecting a IT cultural revolution by imposing a vision that they want to impose on the world in terms of how things are perceived rather than presenting objective reality. Is that a fair statement? Yes, that's a fair statement and I'm having trouble hearing you, but yeah, that's a very accurate date of what Google's intentions would be. And not only were they using double speak and saying that they didn't have political bias in the result. They were also just, well, in my opinion, lines the public and under oath testimony because they said that they were not using blackress. Now me, as in full time and for me, I just went through the internal search engine because you know, when they said they didn't use blackress, I said, I don't know, I don't think that's true. I'm not sure what the search for blackress and what I found was a YouTube controversial police blacklist. Like the file name itself was literally called blacklist. And in this was 42 pages of blacklist returns that were being used to suppress videos across the YouTube platform. So okay, what individuals were targeted with these blacklists on YouTube? Well, with the blacklist, it wasn't actually targeting individuals. It was targeting search terms. So I'll give you an example. The half of the blacklist included stuff about the Las Vegas shooting that happened on October 1, 2017. It also included terms like the eight amendments to the Constitution of Ireland, which is involved with the rightful life. Oh, that was the abortion issue. Yeah, the abortion issue. The abortion issue. It also includes things like cancer cures and a bunch of mass tazelty events that were happening. Also, they were suppressing searches for crisis actors strangely. It's not how it's sure what it is. But what actress? This is crazy. We have theory out there. So there's questioning these results, these videos that have these keywords in them so that people can't find them. Now in terms of individuals, people that were depressed, I didn't really really think of actually much information about this. So what I was able to see was the way that they structured the classifiers. So there was a program that I released the details on called Biocon, which was a classification engine that would run on videos. And what is it possible to move? You sound really underwater. Is it possible just to move Zachary? You know, your signal just went a little bit bad. Is it better now? Not quite. Not quite. Oh, man. I'm right now at the American Priorities. Oh, no worries. Just keep going. I'm starting to rubble. We'll muddle through. Go ahead. Yeah. So there was a lot of YouTube content creators that were being deranged. And the reason why was because the videos were being classified as these talk and write things, and what was happening was, let's see how can I describe this. So when someone says something on a YouTube video, that spoken word is being translated into text. And then that text is being data mined by an AI and identifying, you know, plus words, but also content, like semantic content. Like if it's right wing or whether they're saying the word immigration. And if they do that, then the video gets demonetized, which means that Google takes away all the money associated with that video. So if someone uses one of these blacklisted words, then the video doesn't ever generate any money. So content creators like Tim Poole, the dance around these blacklist terms. And Tim Poole's got a whole bunch of like blacklist terms that he knows exists that aren't acknowledged by YouTube. And if you listen to the videos that he says, you'll see that he dances around. And he says that I can't see that word because Google will demonetize the video. This is how they're able to control a lot of the narrative that was on their YouTube platform is simply by demonetizing the collection of videos that existed. And predominantly these videos were coming from conservatives. And so the words, I understand, I heard that the words were stuff like pro-life stuff. Or what are some of the words that they like targeted? Do we know? Yeah, so I did. So it was really interesting. There was a group of people that came together and funded an investigation on what words were blacklisted. And some of them were laid to conservative content. But they also surprisingly included words like Israel and Shanghai, LGDP. And so there's a lot of content that maybe other nation states outside the United States don't like. And so videos were being demonetized. I know that the media is trying to say that this is a conservative issue, but really what we're seeing is we're seeing the blacklist, the lack of a better term, this blacklist expanding to a whole bunch of different types of material. Is this involved like other countries? I know that there's a whole big issue about is Google censoring for China. Is Google helping China censor? Is this like other countries that wanted to censor these terms like LGBT or to try to stop that? Is that what's happening? Yeah, I think that's what's happening because they know that Turkey was getting in trouble because they were requiring that Google was censoring LGBT content. And I'm thinking that China was also in the news on that exact topic. We don't really know where the audio blacklist is coming from. All we know is that this black box test has identified 3,000 different keywords that will cause the video to be demonetized. And we don't know where those lit that who's determining those terms? Do not do that. Not for this huge blacklist that's in the news right now. This is actually breaking news. This broke like a week ago. Tell us a little bit more about that thing because I'm not up on this. Explain this to us. What is this news with this? Yeah, so okay. So there was this group and people can find this list on my Twitter account if they go to Propept Hall maniac on Twitter. They can see this. But a group of people got together and tested 15,000 keywords in their YouTube videos. And they just uploaded 15,000 different videos with these different text samples within it. And they saw how the Google call a demonetization bot would, whether it would activate and demonetize the video. And for certain keywords, it would cause the video to demonetize. A lot of them were conservative content keywords. But a lot of them actually turned out to be LGBT content. Gay, LGBT, as I said, lesbian and surprisingly Israel. Wow. This is interesting. Oh, and we don't. Full list was posted on my Twitter account. So if anyone, if anyone that's listening to your program right now is skeptical, go to my Twitter account and see the full 3,000 keyword list. And if you know any YouTube content creators, help to get this message out because the whole study has been documented. The methodology has been fully revealed. And it's one of the most massive studies that have ever been undertaken on YouTube censorship. Anyways, going back when I was working at YouTube back in as late as June of 2019, I was noticing that all of these, that there was like the secret blacklist that existed. And additionally, what I saw was the YouTube suggested algorithm. So for example, if you like A, then maybe you'll like B. So if you like Dave Rubin, maybe you'll like Prager University. What I started to see was this recommendation engine was trying to steer people away from independent and alternative news sources and redirect them towards establishment media. So for example, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, and what happened was these content creators were getting saw a dramatic drop in the amount of views that they were getting. Like a lot of people saw a drop as much as 95%. And people were screaming, they were calling it the ad apocalypse because the users were no longer being directed to their traffic and people couldn't even find them. One of the things that's been in the news recently is that Stephen Crowder, if you type in Stephen Crowder into YouTube, he doesn't even appear in the first 17 results. It's happening to be getting these other content creators are doing reaction videos to Stephen Crowder. They're getting pushed to the top. And the thing is that they don't even have a lot of subscribers. Like Prager's got something like a million subscribers. And instead, what's floating to the top are people that have, let's say 2000 subscribers. And so it's very clearly being suppressed. So yeah, no, no, it's clearly being suppressed. Now I want to ask you, we've documented all these things too. Of course, folks, we're speaking with the Google whistleblower's, EG40s. Sek, I want to ask you a question about something that we alluded to earlier with China. Because this is a hot topic right now. We were just discussing in the last hour. And Google has gotten in trouble in the past for doing business with the Communist Party of China. And I wanted to ask you, were those efforts ongoing while you were with the company? Can you give us any indication, any insight into that? Because it was quite troubling. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So Google bought this AI company called DeepMind. And let me just put it in plain language, what that is. DeepMind was creating a God-like AI system that was able to ingest the available public information of the internet and then make sense of it. Think of it like Amazon Alexa, except much, much, much more intelligent. This AI system was moved out of the UK, I believe, and placed into China. And it's been dubbed the AI Manhattan Project. Now Google is not developing this in the United States. They're developing it in China. And Peter, this is a Google affiliate. Or is this a Google-like division? Google bought it and then they moved the project into China. And it's now called Google DeepMind. Oh, boy. Yeah. That sounds pretty creepy. That sounds pretty creepy. Yeah, that sounds pretty creepy. That sounds pretty creepy. Peter Peel said, you know, he accused Google of acting in a treasonous way. This is how serious this project is. The most sophisticated Advanced AI project in the world made by an American company and placed in China. And the sort of thing that this is going to be doing is like surveillance state stuff. I mean, this is the same country that's like surveilling the Weeger Muslims and throwing them in concentration camps. I mean, Google's OK with this. What does this thing do, and what else are they doing with this Google DeepMind? When people think of surveillance, they usually think of country surveillance. This is planetary surveillance of all information that's available on the surface web and also any sources that it can get in the deep web and also utilizing Google's extensive deep analysis of its book scanning stuff. So we're talking, you know, think of one of the library of Alexandria plus all available websites that you can search for. And all that data gets fused together and a decision making process forms because of that. This is essentially what the Google Deep Mind project is all about. How do they justify it? And they're doing it in China. Why in China? I mean, China, this is one of the key areas that they want to dominate in is artificial intelligence because they know how crucial this will be for the future. Why is Google the supposedly super woke company partnering with an authoritarian communist regime that's shooting its people down on the streets of Hong Kong? I mean, not only are they shooting the people in Hong Kong, but they're also doing forced organ harvesting of dissidents targeting the fellong gong harvesting the organs and fallen gong, you know, they are practitioners of health. And so the organs are particularly well suited for organ transportation because they don't have sickness like other people that drink alcohol. And so nobody knows the answer to this question. Peter Keehl's opinion in the New York Times asks the question, why is Google developing this in China? And he asked the question of is it because they are so thoroughly infiltrated by China that they've realized that they have to develop it in China or else they're going to have pressure applied by this nation states. Now personally, I've seen this infiltration happen within YouTube. When I worked there by just my personal team, we had about 20% Chinese nationals. When I resigned, more than half of my team was made up of Chinese nationals. And I saw this throughout the company. And there has been a real serious problem with Chinese nationals being accused of spying, of stealing technology, and there are various Silicon Valley corporations, and also our corporations that have any sort of defense or telecommunications, info associated with them. Do you think that that, I mean, what you're saying, do you think that this is a real problem also with Silicon Valley in particular with Google? Peter, as you mentioned, alluded to. Yeah, I think it's an existential threat. It's an existential threat. We've got, I mean, it's a really bad situation. I mean, I can't stress how bad the situation is, which is one of the reasons why I left Google. One of the things that I saw was, you know, not only are they doing this project within China, but Google has also engaged in the atrix in order to break its ties with the US military. So there was a project called Project Maven and Project Jedi. And what Google did was it leaked the information about how it was dealing with the US military to Reuters, and the media started reporting on the development of this cooperation. And what happened was a dissident group formed at Google to demand that Google cease working with the US military. Now, hey, look, I believe that if a corporation doesn't want to work with any military, that's fine. Okay? The problem is that Google is pretending that it doesn't want to work with, you know, a military, the United States in this case, while at the same time working with China in order to create this AI super weapon. It's astonishing. Now, it's truly, truly disturbing. Zach, where he's whistleblower from Google, now Zach, what do we need to do? What do you think our government needs to do? I mean, and I say this full well, how totally ridiculous some of our guys in DC, our representative in DC are they just don't get it. Many of them seem to be, you know, bought off by China and also by Silicon Valley themselves. But for our folks that are listening who are upset about this, who are, you know, quite disturbed about what we saw this week with the NBA and China silencing a major franchise, what should we be doing about Google and about all of this, do you think? We need to raise awareness that there is a problem. The biggest problem about Google and China is that nobody knows this is going on, which is why I've stopped at nothing, risk everything and sacrifice my entire career and my future in Silicon Valley. I can never get another job in big tech again. And the reason why I did this is because it's so vitally important that people become aware that the national defense, national security, the lawmakers, local commerce, commerce within the United States, the American public. We all are in the dark about what Google is really up to. And so step one is raising awareness. Exactly what the solution is going to be is not something that I'm offering because I don't know. Like this is something that the think tanks have to come up with. This is something that the other tech giants like the telecom industry have to come together and think about. This is something that these different industries and institutions within the United States have to come together and think exactly what is it that we're going to do about this big problem. My hope is that there is a very firm line that's drawn that says, hey, look Google, you've got to bring your deep-mind AI project immediately back into the United States and you have to immediately halt your development of this weaponized AI from China. We cannot be giving this Manhattan project over to a world rival with the United States. It just can't exist. And so step one is we just have to raise awareness about it, which is the reason why I'm here in the American Priorities Conference is I've been getting a presentation today in order to let the people know about this. I've detailed it. Can you also say this is act though? As you say, okay, because we have to make things not just theoretical but actually concrete. Now this thing, this Google Deep Mind that is in China, how does this impact my listeners? What does this mean for them that it sounds nefarious? It sounds like sky net from terminator or something. But what does it actually mean on an individual level that Google is doing this in China and China is going to have a hold of this? How does that impact me? Yeah, okay. Well, you give it like this. Your cell phone is generating data about you. Generating location data from the cell towers. And it's sending that data to the cloud for lack of a better term. That data is then being sold to the Chinese intelligence services. Okay. Right now, China is buying this information and they're not really doing anything with it. But in the very near future, what they can do is that they can start applying pressure on people that are talking bad about. Well, actually, this is already happening, right? People in the NBA are confiscating people when they have signs saying that in the Google users in China, their censorship being applied by China, US citizens today. In the future, that's going to ramp up. Think if you talk about post-organ harvesting, and then all of a sudden, master card under pressure from China shuts off your bank account so that you can no longer do online purchases. Maybe PayPal will shut you off. We've already seen the beginnings of this Chinese style social credit system that's being inflicted upon the dissidents of America. This is not going to stop. This is going to increase. And what are the limits of what this technology can do? And the limits that I see is that someone can get drone killed if they talk about the wrong things that offend China. Imagine someone talking about their organ harvesting, and then a drone killed bot comes in and shoots a bullet in the brain or that poisons them. This is the limit of what we're facing. And the problem is that we don't have this reciprocal infiltration into the Chinese system because they don't have an open market. They are able to take out assets within the United States. They're not able to take out assets in their country. This gives them an asymmetrical advantage. The thing is that if we don't stop the censorship, this Chinese style social credit system is going to continue to infiltrate into the American system. Yes, now I get what you're saying. This is something that I've been saying. But you've just articulated the technology behind it. You could, right now we get a nice little letter from, or an email from Google saying, oh, your YouTube page has been demonetized or something, or a letter, email from a Twitter saying, you know, it'd take down this tweet or we're going to, you know, suspend your account. In the future, we're trying to control this massive AI brain. It's just gone. Your website's gone. Your bank account could be gone. You could be all have all sorts of things happen to you. And you won't know about it. Your Instagram account goes down. Like it all goes down. You're deleted. You're on person from the internet. You know, you can't write Uber anymore. You can't write Lyft anymore. You can't do online transactions. You know, at least in China, they're telling their citizens that they're going to have a social credit system. In the United States, they're just implementing it and not telling, you know, the American people that they're implementing a Chinese style social credit system. Yeah. No, I mean, this is why also the danger of having China in control of a telecommunication system with 5G and all that. I mean, so what you're saying essentially is that Google's just helping them facilitate this future where they collect all this data on us. They know all sorts of things about us and they know exactly how to take out anybody who runs a foul of them. And what we are seeing lately where, I mean, Google or I mean, China excuse me is getting a Marriott employee fired because that Marriott employee tweeted out to something about free Tibet. I mean, it looks so shocking. Like, what the heck? How is China getting some Marriott employee fired? A future that Google is helping China achieve will make it much more easier for them to pin point and target someone who said had some wrong thing, said something that they're friends them and shut that person down. It seems as what you're saying, Zach, for ease. Yep, that's Zach, what I'm saying, Ethan L. right on the head. Yeah, I want to thank you so much for joining us this evening. And we want to hear more from you on this show and elsewhere at Brightbart because you're great American for doing what you did sounding the alarm. And I can only imagine it is quite frightening having literally one of the most powerful corporations in the world as an enemy now. And I want to, before we let you go, I want you to give out your thoughts on that. How are you doing? Because you are like persona non-grata. You are like enemy number one for Google that one of the biggest companies in the world. How you doing? And what is that like? You know, there's a lot of, I feel like I'm in danger because I'm going up against a lot of people. It's almost a trillion dollar company. And right before I disclosed this new project, Veritas, Google caught wind of this and had a wellness check called on my house in San Francisco. And when I didn't answer the door, the police called in a bomb threat because they saw a tin can by the gate entrance. And what happened was when the bomb squad comes in, they have to shut down the streets. So they shut down from 20th to the whole way down to 22nd. The theater by my house called the Mars Theater was shut down. The stores were evacuated. Everyone was evacuated. And I eventually had to come out of the house with a hands up with guns drawn because I realized that, hey, something bad has been happened. Mars will have it done in front of a bunch of cameras rather than have the police come into my house. The reason why this happened, I believe, and I could be wrong, but I believe that Google was trying to stop the disclosure of this information. The threats made to whistleblowers are real. And the shelf life of whistleblowers is not necessarily that long. But I've realized that the only way that I can maintain a sense of safety is to get out in front of the public eye is where much is possible and make it so that an assassination attempt on my life would be very, very expensive. And so I've gone out to Twitter under my handle, Propecial Media Act, and I'm outing Google on an almost daily basis on the things that they're doing and I'm keeping the pressure on. So if anyone out there is listening, you can help me by visiting my Twitter account at Propecial Media, following me, liking the things that I present to the public related to Google censorship and retweeting that. And that's really the safest way that I'm going to be. And overall, I just want to say that living in the system where I know what was coming with the American public did, that was actually more intolerable situation because I was in, I felt spiritually damaged. But having come out and disclosed to the American public, my conscious is clear. And that's a much better feeling, even if I'm in physical danger. You know, I'm delighted. I'm very happy that you came forward. I'm so sorry to hear the stuff that you've been going through. You know, when you see that they call the health check on you or something, what is wellness check? What exactly does it mean? The wellness check means it's a police country house and they ask you a series of questions. And what happened was Google figured out, got a heads up that I had a bunch of their information. After I resigned, they put me under investigation, I refused to cooperate. And then someone from inside Twitter, sorry, from inside Google, outed me on Twitter. And we were able to figure out that it was Google because we put them into a honeypot and they clicked the link. And then we got the IP information, we were able to track it back to Google data center. So we knew that they knew that I knew what their documents were. And so I set out a dead man switch. So I publicly stated to Google the following. I posted on Twitter in the event of my untimely death, all unreleased documents would be disclosed to the American public. I said, dead man switch. And I called up James McEath with Project Baratoss and I let him know that if I died, all the documents that I'd given him go to the public four hours later, the police came to my address. And rather than answer the door, I decided to not answer the door. I didn't want them to know that I was home. Thinking that if they didn't know whether I was home or not, they would just go away. But instead of going away, they called in a bomb threat and a bunch of police officers came to my house. I didn't realize how far they had escalated it until I started hearing the helicopter flying over my house. I refused to actually believe that the helicopter you were there for me, I thought it was coincidence. But after about 15 minutes, I realized that, yeah, the helicopter is for me and that there's police up and down the road and the road shut off. So they were not going to leave until either I came home or I came out. They didn't know whether I was there or not. So they said this whole thing up, not knowing that I was actually at the house. And so it refused. Once I made contact with them over the phone, I tried to strike a deal where they could ask me the questions about whether, like the wellness questions which included whether I planned to commit suicide, whether I wanted to do any, like, hurt anyone, whether I had suicide ideation, whether I was supposed to be on any medication that I had skipped, which I don't take any medication. So I was all this designed to basically, you know, threaten you into handing over the documents or something or what or just to try to delegitimize you by making it look like you're a complete nut. So in case these documents did come out. Yeah. I think it was to make me look like a nut. I think what they wanted to do was get me into psychological evaluation and then say, oh, this guy's crazy. And I knew that the crazy guy that they were paying like six, well over six figures, yeah, I quarter a million dollars every year. Exactly. We're going to have to have. We're going to have to have you back, Zach. This has been just, yeah, because we're going really long way way over. Zach, Zach, I want to thank you so much again really quickly before we let you go. Can you give us your Twitter handles for our people can go and check out your Twitter page? Yes. My Twitter handle is perpetual maniac. They can all from history for Zach Voorhees, like Jason Voorhees, the Zach Voorhees on Twitter. All right, Zach, thank you so much. And you know what? You were so impressed with Zach Voorhees. You were an amazing patriot. We're an amazing story. And you know what? Zach has agreed to stay over online with us, folks, because we want to take some calls from you guys. If you guys want to talk with Zach about his experiences at Google, if you can answer some more questions for us, again, our number 86695, Patrick, give us a call. But let's go first to Jerry in Kentucky online, too. Jerry, welcome to the show. And Rick, Rick, I commend you for your bravery. You're a true American patriot. And I wish you the best of luck in the future. And you're fighting against Google. And I wanted to remind you, but I think when Google first started, they didn't let them what their corporate models do know evil. And obviously they are attacking our Western way of life. And I thought it was very scary when he said that 5% of his team was like Chinese nationals. That was really eye opening. The infiltration is going on. And I wanted to also make a comment about what I said earlier about the NSA. And comparing the NSA to the Chinese social credit system, and you really can't do that. The NSA program, yes, it was a massive surveillance program. But it was designed to prevent, and they were trying to prevent the 10 to 25 megaton nuclear bomb completely destroying Manhattan. And a good portion of all the girls around New York City and easily vaporizing 10 million people. Yeah, you're comments about your team at Google. But when you left, that was quite interesting. As you mentioned, 20% of your team had been made up of Chinese nationals when you started. And by the time you quit, you said half. And at one point, in some aspect, you could say, well, maybe they were just foreign exchange students that are studying here now or whatever. But at another point, you say, well, we have had a real serious problem in the past with Chinese foreign nationals stealing, being God's buy, stealing our tech secrets and all these things. And I know that you probably don't want to come right out and say it. But this is also a peer deal. It was alleging, and a lot of others are alleging that, yeah, this is a real problem. Is it sort of a, people are kind of afraid to say it's straight out, but they're buying the scenes concerned about it. That's the sense I get. Zach. I mean, yeah, it sounds racist, right? You're like, hey, we've got a lot of Chinese coming into the company. And that's a problem. And people have been so hit over the head, over and over and over again, to not think in terms of whether a company accurately reflects the people that it comes from, that we can't even point this out. That's right, it's sitting right there in our faces. And people have this conspiracy of silence because they're afraid that it's the politically correct thing to state the obvious. But this is the obvious, which is the fact that Chinese nationals have flooded into the company. And what are we going to do? Yeah, that's a big question. Let me ask you a simple question. Are they coming in on H1B visas? Yes, absolutely. Well, that's what we can do about it. Yeah, that's what we can do about it. We need to, I mean, I think, all right, then I call in Congress. I think it's a really good segue. I call in Congress to investigate the H1B visas that we've audited for these tech giants. And that includes Facebook, that includes Google, that includes any company that has vital critical infrastructure to the United States. That's a good question. And that's actionable. Right away, yeah. I mean, because I'm not totally here with you're saying, Zach, because none of us want to be targeting individuals like we all, obviously, we all know, people that we've worked with who might have been Chinese nationals, who become American citizens, et cetera, wonderful people, so we're not like we want to target them because of where they came from. But at the same time, this is a concern. This is an audit something that's not legitimate. We've had instances, very high profile instances, very recently, of this, you know, really. We weren't allowing, we weren't allowing recently immigrated Germans to enter the Manhattan project, okay? That's just stupid, even think about. And the fact that we are effectively opening the doors to a country that has proven its willingness to sell an intellectual property, we've got a trade war that's going on over the theft of intellectual property, at least partially. And the fact that we are now essentially opening the doors to our tech giants, to all of our intellectual, all of our countries, intellectual property through the tech giants, and opening the doors to people who are potential. Yeah, not troubling you. And you know, I guess the best example also would be the Cold War with the Soviet Union. We were not allowing Russian nationals to the Cold War to be like, yeah, come on and work for our atomic energy company. And this is essentially what Google is. When you look at Google and the AI future, that is as significant as our atomic energy secrets would have been in the Cold War, I think. Exactly. What are your thoughts on this? I mean, it's worse. I mean, think about all the different utilities that you use that operate on Chinese, you know, manufactured computer parts. Like even the toasters are being connected to the internet, okay? And think of the cars, the airplanes, all these different, you know, circuit boards have moved their manufacturer out of the United States and into China. And what was the result? We have these embedded back doors that were installed into the hardware of all of our industry. Like, you know, forget about, I mean, with a nuclear bomb, you can take out a city. We're talking about sophisticated technology that can stop working, which will effectively take out the entire country and make it stop functioning. That's the situation. Yeah. That's a great, potentially take out, you know, like everything from our power grid, all of that stuff could be, this is how, you know, when they do the Pentagon war game, you know, projects and procedures to see like how a war game would, you know, shake out. One of the things that they don't like to tell you is that they've discovered again and again. No, China could take us out really quickly by just going right after a partner or satellite all the stuff that they have. You know, our military equipment is actually able to operate in a theater of war, okay? Yep. You know, for a new assumption, what if China is able to disable our military hardware? What if they, yeah, you're like that. That's exactly what is, you know, we are up against the break though. Zach, you've got to come back on. We got to talk more with you.