Advertisement
World of Hot Water ~ Intro to the CORRECTED History of Weaponized Weather
What if there were a truth so monstrous that the entire last hundred years needed to be rewritten? Would you want to KNOW or see the evidence for it? What you haven't been told about the reality of WEAPONIZED WEATHER today, the evidence, and the history behind it. We are in a World of Hot Water, and here's how it came about... Episode 1.
- Category: Beyond the Veil (BTV# Radio),Chemtrails / Geoengineering ,DEW, Directed-energy weapon,WeatherWarfare/WeaponizedWeath
- Duration: 31:52
- Date: 2018-09-02 11:59:48
- Tags: world of hot water, wohw, weaponized weather, climate, change, engineering
3 Comments
Video Transcript:
What if there were a truth as monstrously huge as it is monstrously hidden lies? What if this truth was at the root of some of the biggest problems facing humanity and the world today? Would you want to know? Our high-trological cycle has been hacked into high-tech decades ago. The final phases are in the works as we speak. My name is Rafaela O'Neil, aka No La Butterfly, and the following is a story of how I came to make this shocking discovery. The evidence, the validates, the bold clean that our weather is hacked, and the necessary retelling of the last hundred years of history to account the presence of our weaponized weather system as it has sprung up in our midst in front of our very eyes, and which today puts us in a world of hot water. But so it could be said that Godrico bodies revealed I could know how it was possible to secure this earth with a combination of events- today was the great cause of the past picture that happened in March 2016, and then presented Jarbo sauce in November 2018. I stumbled upon the subject of climate engineering and geoengineering and spent the next seven years studying the subject. And after writing my children's book, Funny Clouds, a chemtrail tale and taking on trolls and the alleged debunkers face to face, I learned that some of the nuances of the chemtrail argument were right or wrong, dead ends. I looked at all the narratives, spoke with various chemtrail community leaders and hosted a podcast that explored the issue away from any gatekeepers. I learned a few things and even made an original discovery that no one else in the world had quite yet put together, quite so specifically. First of all, I learned that the big secret all sides of the narrative we're missing was that water vapor and not CO2 was the most prominent greenhouse gas on earth. And that not only are billions spent on covering this up, but that this is and has the most significant impact on climate according to NASA. Who says, even small changes in the abundance or locations of clouds could change the climate more than the anticipated changes caused by greenhouse gases, human produced aerosols, or other factors associated with global change. I also learned that despite being able to prove that planes are dropping chemicals in their fallout, which planes are dropping which chemicals is impossible to prove? This is why the public is allowed to have the chemtrail narrative. It is a safe narrative. Sure it's on the alternative side of things, but it is very controlled. In fact, not only is it a safe narrative, but it is a desired narrative because the truth of the matter is that all contrails are chemtrails. Repeat. All contrails are chemtrails. Those contrails are not condensed and nonpixied us, Darlin. Not realizing this neural linguistic programming trick of language allows aviation to get away with monstrous pollution, which if checked would make it harder for them to get away with the weaponized aspect of the program. I soon realized that Weather War 101 was the only one who could explain and prove where severe weather events came from, each and every time a community was taken out by one. While everybody else was talking about chemtrails, you can catch and or the heart facility in Alaska you couldn't get to. This guy, whoever he was behind his mask and on the midi, was on the ball. Weather plants releasing massive amounts of water vapor synchronized with other plants fed into the hydrological system, guided by Doppler radar. After interviewing Weather War 101 and getting some traction exposing this work, I made my own illuminating discovery in the last 2017 hurricane season. At the eye of all the storm, go directly into Doppler radar and half for years now. Just how many and for how far back exactly remains to be seen, but the entire 2017 hurricane season followed this discovery's trend. Was this why I was able to interview a former army captain in charge of gathering supplies and get his testimony that he was ordered to bring as many body bags to New Orleans 11 days before Katrina made landfall? Even that he brought 5226 body bags eight days prior, even though I didn't know about the storm until three days prior to landfall. I'm leaving out a name, another pertinent information, a name Captain G. Captain G of the 104 transportation division. And you had deliveries to what about some of the harder things you delivered? Well, in 2005, New Orleans was struck by a little bit of a call. It came to Katrina. And at that time, I was stationed in the military base in Georgia. And I found it strange that 11 days before the storm hit, 11 days, I mean, I don't even think I remember hearing any day being predicted about this storm coming into about four or five days before the storm. But this emergency conference came in for us to gather up as many body bags and move about 52 to body bags. First thing, I think it's a plus. Iraqis have taken over, you know, there's some big terrorists event that's about to go down on us. And basically, I was correct, but it wasn't. See, my mom is being trained to think that Arabs, Muslims were our terrorists. But today, that particularly a United States gun, the biggest fucking terrorists. And I say just to say, I love the military, but I love some of the Sikh students. I appreciate that we do unnecessary should we do. But when they ordered the 52 hundred buyer bags and told us that it's going to be for they say the exact area they need to go set boards. And they said there's nothing that we're going to be able to do. This is going to be such a major flood that we're going to need these body bags. They want us to live with those. So we get there, we deliver them. But anyways, so we did that. And I found it strange that that was all they wanted us to deliver at that time. They want to send about supplies. Right. But the day we got there, I also found it strange. Although you do have at that time on Poland, it was a naval base. I found it strange that I kept running into and almost seemed like three teams of Navy seals. And although as an officer, I am privileged to some top security stuff, but I don't think that that naval research base is a training facility of theirs. Though I couldn't be wrong because I have not known much about the intelligence, but I just found that strange that they were there. They were in anticipation of something. That's what I believe. This was how many days again before the storm? No, at that point now, because it takes a while to gather up all of those. We were told to walk. We were told to work 24 hours shifts. So getting those things. So we fulfilled that order within right about 72 hours. So I would say this now marks us at about eight days before the storm. So eight days before the storm? 5,000? 226. What was it? 5,226 body bags were delivered to New Orleans. In anticipation to the storm, they were saying? They didn't tell us why they did it. They didn't tell you why. I mean, yes, you're correct. OK, at first, right. But then that's when we got to New Orleans. That's when we, yeah. No way, the other way around. You're right. No, you tell me. I don't know. Yes, we were told that Hurricane Katrina was going to be there. They told us the category 5. OK, that was when you got to New Orleans. They told you that. No, no, that was you remember the first briefing. The first briefing. So we already knew why we were in the countryside. But why New Orleans and not some other part in the Gulf Wars? I just where it was going to land or how were they so sure that it was coming to New Orleans? They said that New Orleans was going to be the hardest hit. That's interesting because they could predict that by they said, by the satellite, they were using with a 210% accuracy of their prediction. Was this also why a source in the military in Texas told me before the general public was told about Harvey's existence that he was told to pack his bags before the storm was even a tropical depression. After getting a heads up for Harvey, I discovered the eye of Irma going directly into Doppler radar when making landfall and following this trend all the way inland. I followed Nate Maria. They too followed Doppler. I for I. Our team went back to Katrina and discovered that it too was Doppler bait. At least five Doppler radars in a row in three states. This along with the guidance of chemtrails to manage the fronts is how daily weather is made and has been for years now as incredible and certainly crazy as it all sounds. This is where our research has taken us. This trend surpasses tremendous statistical odds. And if it continues to prove to hold up during the rest of our research, we'll be the Achilles heel that all the gate keepers will want to guard against the most. We feel that there is another component applied to create and direct monstrous stream over the oceans, but as of yet cannot be sure of what exactly, though it may employ satellite or drones outfitted with the lasers of some type or a steam making ship. But I doubt it's land-based. However, while on land the hurricanes interact with radar just like the other weather events except that the hurricane steering is the most damning. What does the meteorological community have to say about all this you may ask? Great question. The answer is, unfortunately, nothing. At least to the public. After trying to get my meteorologist to answer questions about chemtrails for years, she finally offered to run a story on albedo modification and contrail pollution. After I asked her to actually define the conditions that allowed a contrail to form, versus those required for it to persist and form jet series. She admitted that she can't. At least she offered to run the story until the woman at the National Weather Service in NOAA. She referred me to to answer my questions. She couldn't. Told her to can. The story. I learned from them both that there is nobody at the meteorological level that is expected to tell the public the truth about artificial clouds or weather. In fact, the NOAA reports to the world meteorological organization that no weather modification projects were conducted in the United States. Even though the world meteorological organization states in the same report that hydrological companies have been at the cloud-seating game the longest, 50 years ongoing. I asked the lady why the lack of reporting by the NOAA and she said they were not obligated by law to report on activities publicly. I said, y'all did in the past when you were not obligated, so what changed? Crickets. I asked, whose job was it to notify the public of artificial weather? Crickets. I asked, why is Doppler appearing to steer the storms? Crickets. I have found that the best way to advance the narrative is to not make claims but to see what the official narrative says and to hold it accountable to itself, to see if it holds any water and to make waves that way. Since the Coen Trail, Chem Trail, geoengineering narrative was too far gone into plausible deniability for too long, it is now too late to make a point of it either way, because since 2017, it has been made legal for national security issues. The urgency of global warming or climate change being the key that finally unlocked this legal right. But the realization of two major basic facts pointed the way and unlocked the door to me asking the right set of questions leading to my total realization of the full scale weather manipulation program that is going on today. These two major emissions were number one, that CO2 and not H2O is the most prominent greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gases led by CO2 are leading contributors to climate change drivers. OK, this is just a document what comes up. IPCC greenhouse gases. The first ones are the ones with CO2. This is CO2. Those gas emissions by sector. CO2 from fossil fuel, where's the water? Where's H2O? It's 80% to 90% of the greenhouse gases. OK, CO2 from fossil fuel shares of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Why are contrails not on here? I promise I'm not making it up. Water vapor is, I've got to find a graph here that talks about water vapor, carbon dioxide. I mean, this is just Google Images. So this is showing me all the articles that would carbon dioxide is the big bulk here. Am I a liar? I must be a liar. I mean, how can the largest carbon dioxide all these maps are showing carbon dioxide as a most prominent carbon dioxide? Wow. And yet, we're just going to change this. Let's add water vapor. If you look for it, they can't hide it from me because it is. It is a scientific fact. Oh, yeah, here we go. Water vapor. CO2 other. See that? And yet, NASA says, even small changes in the abundance or location of clouds could change the climate more than the anticipated changes caused by greenhouse gases, human-produced air soils or other factors associated with global change. NASA. The reply given by skeptics as to why CO2 gets the credit for being the leading greenhouse gas, which doesn't hold any water either, is because allegedly CO2 has anthropogenic causes, or can be affected by man. Whereas water vapor cannot. That is the biggest lie. The biggest lie states that man is not capable of changing the water vapor content or exchanges between the Earth's various surfaces and the atmosphere, except as a secondary result of increasing CO2 levels, which then increased the heat and thus, and only then is able to evaporate more water. But it turns out there are other sources of anthropogenic water vapor releases and major ones at that. A mission number two would yield to the discovery of those as well. Number two, another major mission. At the heart of the contrail versus chemtrial debate is whether or not those contrails are forming on chemicals or ice crystals. That argument misses the fact that it is both. However, according to the scientific community, ISSRs, ice supersaturated regions, are the number one determining factor that yields the probability of having contrails persist no matter what airline is employed. My team and I's own findings concurred with that claim. However, ISSRs were missing from the glossary of meteorological terminology, the NOAA, puts out, despite being the simplest explanation of why contrails would persist. Why? Also, increases in ISSRs are credit for the rise of contrail persistence and the given excuse for why we have the removal of skies. But the funny thing is that there is not supposed to be greater amounts of moisture at higher altitudes than there are at lower ones. Because, further up you go, the less air they're supposed to be. Four. I was trained at junked air force by the National Weather Service. Now, the technology that we used was 40 years ahead of anything that was sitting in people's homes. And that's part of the course with the military. At each stratum of the atmosphere, which could be a thousand feet, five thousand feet, five hundred feet, it all depends on what stratums are looking at. All right? It's very inexact science. Believe me, we did not have the redstone to God. The only place that you can predict the possibility of humidity is at base level, which is usually from zero to 4,000 feet in the air. And that is with 20% accuracy rate. OK. So these are not readings from balloons that get an actual... No. No, you can't get. You can't get relative humidity from a balloon. I never did. We never did. OK. And is there any chance that the technology might have changed since... Yes. So there's no way really to monitor the humidity. And you are also saying it's not possible to have humidity that much like more humidity on the upper atmosphere than on the lower atmosphere? No. It's not possible. Because if farther up, you get the less air there is. And so what is patient nuclei, which is exactly what... It's dust particles. It's anything that in a lot of mode you can attach to in order to form a cloud. And I'm going to tell you something. The island of the clouds that I see on a daily basis are anything like clouds or all fake clouds. Yeah. I can't even find the bases on a stratus level. They all have this icky dew that comes out on the bottom of every single freaking cloud. I can't tell you where the bases are of a zero-cube. I don't know what level. Like right now I'm looking outside and I'm trying to determine the base level, which would be my report. As in five scattered, meaning 5,000 scattered, 5,000 deep elevation scattered. I can't find the bottom. This is where Weather War 101 comes in. And my interview is available for the world to see, I recommend it, under Weather War 101 interview, by Rafael O'Neal. And what I learned blew my own mind despite the fact that I'd been following climate engineering along its harrowing paths, twists and turns for seven years already. What I learned is that it's not just some cloud seating, not just some weather modification here and there. But it was indeed the hacking of the entire hydrological cycle on a level deeper and more interconnected than I had hoped to learn myself. It was at this time that I made a few discoveries of my own. First of all, one day Doppler Radar was down. Product Missing. This was a saved website. It's a little star here. It must sing and click here for the Cali Access status update. This service is no longer available in accordance with the National Weather Service Change Notice 16, 16, where it go. And raw data. Please see weather.gov and data. It's funny. Cali Access Down, which is why you can't access the data on that one website that I captured earlier. But it's also one of the days that's like the foggy. So when there is no activity or lack of activity, moisture is able to roll in. So all of these little microwaves are propellant outward. The moisture really creating it. Drows. Creating. And you know, a lack of precipitation. You know, a lot of activity here in our slide L1. Of course, what really got me going and tying things together was the realization during Irma that oh my gosh, yes indeed, the eye of the storm was going directly into Doppler Radar where I then correctly predicted where the next two strike points would be aligned with the Doppler Radar and how I've been able to predict the landfalls of the hurricanes ever since. Look at the eye of the hurricane going right over Doppler Radar. Imminent landfall and look. This is not a hurricane. This is a land-based weather event. Going right. Look at this. Right over it. Look at this. It's going this way. Yeah, hey Doppler. Oh, we just tell you what's going on. What a hurricane. What a freaking hurricane on a terms of storm surge. You just party is open. Get the word out people in the space. You don't think this is enough information and then look at what all we've been saying. We're seeing these storms coming over the next rad over the next rad over the next rad. Ten miles from making landfall means that the American landfall of this hurricane is imminent. All right, here we go guys. The storm is being guided. Next rad to next rad. The eye is going right towards the next rad centers. Here we go. We're going to have to re-add that to the edit. Let's see if we just keep ping-ponging from next rad and next rad. So far every storm takes place over. Fuckin' next rad Doppler radar. No meteorologist is noticed. None. Here we go. We're going to be... There's a bear. I'm coming daddy. I'm coming daddy. Mama in Africa says hi. Because you know these came out of power plants in Africa. Look at weather war 101. I don't have time to redo people's work. And here we go. We have another one. Come in right over next rad. This is the third next rad in a row. They are going from next rad to next rad. This is Georgia. It's September 11th. 6, 7, 8, it's like projecting into the day I guess. What? Good morning. That's what they see it doing in the next few hours. Well, we have a third one guys. We have a freaking third one. I'm here. I'm here. I'm here. Implicating Doppler radar is a tall claim to make. And in order to justify it. I decided to go backwards in history and retrace when the origins of such a monstrous program could have possibly snuck in. And what other radar evidence could I gather to prove that I was not indeed mistaken in this hypothesis? What follows is worthy of rewriting history. Or rather, simply assimilating it as it is, neglected in its totality. Please join us again for our next episode. As we continue to explore the history of the last hundred years, the history of weaponized weather and weaponized Doppler radar. The history of this world of hot water. The history of this world of hot water. The history of this world of hot water. The history of this world of hot water. The history of this world of hot water.