How Nasa almost destroyed the Flat Earth Dome Tent Reality. The True Story

Video Transcript:

I need to know now, know now, can you love me again? I need to know now, know now, can you love me again? I need to know now, know now, can you love me again? I need to know now, know now, can you love me again? I need to know now, know now, can you love me again? I need to know now, know now, can you love me again? Can you love me again? Yeah, I'm forgetful, I'm stolen, branch yourself The sabotein is too. They roll the walls to me, taste for everything They bring down angels like you My eyes and my hands form the ground Rising up to you Feel with all the strength I found out there's nothing I can do I need to know now, know now, can you love me again? I need to know now, know now, can you love me again? Can you love me again? Oh, I told you once again, do this again Do this again, do this again Do this again, do this again, do this again Do this again, do this again I need to know now, know now, can you love me again? I need to know now, know now, can you love me again? I need to know now, know now, oh yeah I love it, I love it, I love it I love it, I love it, I love it I love it, I love it, I love it I love it, I love it, I love it Where does knowledge come from? Recently, it came from just three sources. Number one, evolution. That's the knowledge that's encoded in your DNA. Number two, experience. That's the knowledge that's encoded in your neurons. And number three, culture, which is the knowledge you acquire by talking with other people, reading books, and so on. And everything that we do, right, everything that we are basically comes from these three sources of knowledge. Now, what's quite extraordinary is just only recently, there's a fourth source of knowledge on the planet, and that's computers. There's more and more knowledge now that comes from computers is discovered by computers. And this is as big of a change as the emergence of which these four was. University institutions, physics, the Royal Society in London, that's the fourth source, and that's Newtonian physics. Why objects move on a ball spinning a thousand miles an hour while it's going 26,000 miles around the Sun. It's basically the model we accept right now. I don't feel it's spinning a thousand miles an hour right now, that's because of gravity. Hey, gravity, what's that? That's the thing you can't feel. Okay, can you prove that in equation? Yeah, I can prove that in equation. It took Newton like a book three times thicker than the Bible, and he still couldn't finish his equation on how to prove gravity. He would try to prove gravity when you read Newton's book of principia through Stephen Hawking. Well, if you even find the original book, he would prove by saying that, and we started with the word if, if you fucking take Newton's book of like if, if, the earth is a ball, and objects are being thrown this way, blah, blah, you know, that means that we're spinning at this amount of velocity, and you can't feel it, and why the objects don't go flying off into the universe is because of gravity, because of a vacuum system of air pressure. I mean, you went to hyperbole, into ifs. I mean, it came in a highlight every time the word proof right there. This is an official massive photo of the first of Paul Levin lunar module landing on the moon. I mean, it's right there. This is proof, man. It's the picture's right there. It's landing on the moon. But the only problem I have with this picture is that it's taken from the moon. And I would be glad to be dealing with being the first guy in the moon. It seems the camera crew was already there. Fucking tripod. Camera abc. You know, back in the 60s, I mean, I know people who believe they saw the landing on the moon because they heard it on the radio. I don't get any of the other moon, I can hear the dust. I got it, I can hear more. He's walking slow. There's zero gravity up there. Jesus. They're on there now. They're on there now. Can you see a guy in the sounds to you just taking fucking the bag of sanctions for anyone who denies that this challenge is real? We don't have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society. This is the Galileo satellite full authentic NASA imagery of the Galileo satellite must have cost like $3 for this fucking operation. This is the Galileo satellite. They never knew what to go that for and reach Jupiter. You know, they didn't know it's the first time anything goes that far. It managed to get there. There's Jupiter. There's one of its moons. I mean, it's clearly lining up to take some really good photos of Jupiter. Immediately followed by a camera satellite. Perfectly composing the whole shot out in outer space. Amazing, eh? What the cameras could do when they fly. It's an entire outer space. A place we've never been to. That's amazing. Look at that. That's perfect. Or should we just stick to the sermon on the mountain? A passage that is so radical that is doubtful that our own defense department would survive its application. Folks haven't been reading their Bible. The show that you're this flat. A very simple one to think of is that we use plumbabs to build buildings. In other words, to get the wall of a building going straight down, you'll take a string with a heavy weight hanging from it. And you make the building follow that string. That plumbab will point to the center of a round earth. That means that if you imagine that this was the correct earth, you can imagine a plumbab held here would point in that direction. That means the buildings would be bigger on the top than at the bottom. Take a look at this rare super slow motion video of flight 175 that hit the South World Trade Center tower on 9-11-11. Take a really close look because there are two impossibilities I'm going to show you here. This video was allegedly shot by Michael Herzacani, a diamond merchant based in Los Angeles, California. The first impossibility is a real airplane couldn't have sliced through a building with a steel facade with reinforced concrete flooring and 47 steel support beams. A jet swing can't slice through steel building like a hot knife through butter. But that's the story the news media wants us to believe and most people are still believing this hoax. But the second impossibility is in plain sight. In fact, I can't believe it took me over 12 years to see. Let me show you a still of this video. I've highlighted a building that's clearly behind the South World Trade Center tower. Yet when we pay close attention to the video, flight 175's wing should appear in front of the building, not behind it. This is a layering CGI glitch and this proves that this video, which was seen all over the world, over and over and over again, year after year, is a CGI rendering. Thus it's not an amateur witness video. It's a fake. And this is one of many, many faked videos put out by the news media. You