Advertisement
Trump Assassination Hoax - Michael Hoffmann - Textbook Case of Controlled Opposition
I’ve never seen one mainstream narrative so voraciously defended as the Trump assassination attempt, which we know was fake.
On the heels of Fetzer’s 4D chess theory of the Trump assassination, we have a new entrant in the controlled opposition sweepstakes, Michael A Hoffman.
https://twitter.com/HoffmanMichaelA
Listen as Hoffman pushes federal agency failure, possibility of multiple shooters, uses the fake Alex Jones Sandy Hook trial to try to silence those who would question Trump’s assassination as a hoax, and tries to claim Sandy Hook was a real shooting.
For Fetzer’s 4D chess theory (start at 43:45): https://www.bitchute.com/video/VXq35YsCUDma
Clip is taken from https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/michael-a-hoffman-ii/id1449753062?i=1000664460412
- Category: Hoax Season,Controlled Opposition
- Duration: 06:58
- Date: 2024-08-07 02:08:58
- Tags: no-tag
5 Comments
Video Transcript:
in spirit and there are many examples but July 13th in Butler, Pennsylvania was probably one of the prime ones in terms of what I have discerned about it. Well tell me a bit more about that. Tell me some things you've noticed. Okay, well I'll try to boil it down to three points chiefly. Number one, the US Secret Service did not include in its perimeter and this is fairly well known now. The building and the vicinity of Mr. Trump's podium where the suspect Crooks is said to have fired the shot that hit the president. They left the crucial responsibility for securing a nearby structure to law enforcement and then did not bother to ascertain whether or not the regional police forces had indeed secured it. Okay. Point number two, the Secret Service audio which would normally be kept classified so early in the so-called investigation was broadcast on CNN cable TV news. July 14th, one day later, an individual agents could be heard saying that the shooter was down and words to the effect that there was no further threat. Really? Less than a minute after the ex-president had been graced by a bullet, the Secret Service had ascertained that there was no second or third shooter lurking nearby. Who would have that information other than parties to the crime? For the six foot three inch Trump was allowed to stand and become an easy target again after first crouching and being covered by the agents. The second point is, and this is probably the most egregious, or the third point, I'm sorry, the FBI had declared that the shooter was alone gunman and had no accomplices and they made that statement less than 24 hours after the crime was committed. This ludicrous, a criminal investigation truly begins an earnest after a perpetrator has been identified. The search for accomplices is something that takes days or weeks at least. And a declaration like this from the FBI before the alleged perpetrator's cell phone had even been decrypted as a joke. It's equivalent to the mocking gests of the aptly named Hellfire Club of 18th century England. The FBI's instantly instant declaration fits a pattern of similar omniscient statements by cops in the media, which I have seen in my lifetime with regard to Lee Harvey Oswald, David Berkowitz, Ted Kaczynski, among others like that. So what's the sub-rosam message being conveyed to the subconscious of the American group mind by these kind of rushed to judgment declarations of sole responsibility within a day or two of the arrests? The same thing happened with Berkowitz. He was on Newsweek, the sole suspect. I investigated the Unabomber arrest and apprehension and Kaczynski's life as a reporter at that time. I was on the scene almost immediately after his apprehension. So what's the message here? Who would be in a position to put forth so quickly and didactically the claim that the accused had no other assistance, direction or encouragement? Who would have the brazen confidence to state publicly the certainty that no other guilty parties or accomplices will be discovered so early in the investigation? And my answer is James, only the accomplices themselves could make such a statement in the expectation that will be accepted by the public, as well as the media who are supposed to be tasked with investigating the veracity of official statements. So the crooks behind the only blame crooks theory now elevated to a rock-solid FBI determination, they're not simply testing our cognition and alertness, they're laughing at us. The accounts thus far of the attempt on the life of President Trump comprise a message to the subconscious of America and it's not a very subtle one. In fact, it's fairly sloppy and in my view from what I know of the revelation of the method deliberately so. So I'll give you a chance to jump right in here after this. In the revelation of the method, era, our overlords don't object if we come to realize that there's something very wrong with the official government and corporate media tale that is being woven. Our guardians and watchdogs are lying and misleading us and our awareness of this truth is anticipated. This is the revelation of the method era. It's part of their just. The joke is on us. Yeah. What you're saying rings absolutely true to me, but it's very interesting how even what you might call the conspiracy community has been deeply divided on this one. There are some people who say how dare you suggested it wasn't real. Then you see the blood on the president's ear and it was just a just a flu. No, not even a man like Trump as reckless as him would risk being shot in this way. So how do you account for that because we're talking only a minority of people who actually get this? Well, I don't see it as staged. I worry about the concept of staging. Obviously, there have been a staged attacks, but this is where people have crashed up on the killing in Connecticut there at the school claiming that it was staged. These were crisis actors who performed it. Alex Jones ended up being sued for close to a billion dollars successfully for claiming that it didn't happen in the way that it was said to have happened. I'm a little bit different from that before I can see staging. I have to actually be on the scene. That's my feeling about it or to talk to people who are eyewitnesses there. I haven't gotten that flavor. Now I agree with you in terms of the burnout factor among conspiracy theorists because I wonder how many of them are actually interested in getting at the truth of these crimes and bringing the perpetrators to justice and how many are hopeless about that prospect. In turn, are actually third thrill seekers who want a shot of dopamine from this thrill and then they move on two weeks later due to all the noise on the internet which is constantly distracting us so that we can barely concentrate on one particular issue before we're on to the next one. I have seen at least here in America that kind of thrill seeking. It's very degenerate in my judgment. It's like being at a carnival side show and going from the Huchi Kuchi tent to the magician onto the next spectacular show as that great book by Guy Debord, the Society of the Spectacle, more or less laid the ground for work for the phenomena that I believe is behind the scenes in the conspiracy theory movement.