My Story We Need To Ask Questions Dad Died After Vaccine

Video Transcript:

Hello, the date is the 28th of March. I have some personal information to share because I am concerned about the vaccination programme and I feel I need to speak out. So please bear with me as it's important. Sadly my dad unexpectedly died at the end of January. He died of heart failure. Less than 24 hours before my dad had his first heart attack, he was given the Pfizer vaccination. I would like to point out that prior to his vaccination my dad was a very fit and healthy 76 year old man. He did not smoke, he drank very little alcohol, he exercised daily, he had never been into hospital before and there is no history of heart disease in his family. He had his vaccination on Saturday the 23rd of January. Less than 24 hours later he was suffering with what he thought was indigestion in his solar plexus, like a energy and loss of appetite and was struggling to sleep. His symptoms continued until the following Wednesday. He was advised by a GP of a phone call consultation that he was likely to be experiencing some side effects from the vaccination and to call back in a couple of days if there was no improvement. My sister visited him later that day and called 111 because his pulse rate was 122 and he was now having difficulty breathing. He was taken to out of hours emergency services for a consultation where an ambulance was called and he was taken to A&E with suspected pneumonia. He had a negative COVID test in hospital. We received a phone call at 1am on Thursday morning after his results to tell us that my dad had had a substantial heart attack on Sunday. At 3.30 am we had another phone call and we were told that my dad had had a second heart attack in A&E. He had now gone into heart failure and we should attend the hospital as soon as possible. The cardiologist at the hospital was very confused as to why my dad was not responding to the treatment he had been given. He said he was the fit of 76 year old he had ever seen. His heart was very badly damaged from the two heart attacks. His kidneys had failed and devastatingly there was nothing the hospital could do for him. We sat with my dad for 33 hours. He fought until the end and peacefully passed away on Friday the 29th of January. We reported my dad's death to the MHRA. This information regarding a possible death on my Pfizer vaccination was reported to what is called the Yellow Card Scheme by the MHRA on the government website. It was reported on the 9th of February. The government also have a black triangle scheme which is a continued monitoring of medicines with a black triangle status. The vaccines which are commonly being used to vaccinate the population against COVID-19 have a black triangle status which is in place to signify medicines that are subject to intense monitoring. The symbol is not removed until the safety of the drug is well established. Because the COVID-19 vaccines are labelled with a black triangle, the government website advises that all adverse reaction, the curving and individuals of any age after vaccination should be reported to the MHRA using the yellow card scheme. Not many people know about these schemes. So to clarify, our report was sent on the 9th of February, yet it has taken six and a half weeks for the MHRA to respond and ask for further information. So one of two things that are happening here, either the MHRA are inundated with ADRs, adverse drug reactions and it's taken them weeks to read through all of the reports. Or there is serious negligence on their behalf in following up and investigating vaccination reaction reports including a report of a possible service adverse event, AIE ADR. So what is confusing me is that the government are vaccinating millions of fit and healthy people. Children are taking part in clinical trials here in the UK with discussions of vaccinating children as early as August. Pfizer have announced that they are starting clinical trials in America on children as younger six months old and consider the trial a crucial step towards curving the coronavirus pandemic. Discussions are in place with indications of a vaccine passport system that will undoubtedly discriminate against people who do not want to participate in this vaccination programme. And the media are labeling people who do not want to take part in the vaccination programme anti-faxes and anti-faxes activists to anyone that speaks out, which will ultimately cause a massive divide in society. This is all very concerning for me when our report of a possible service adverse event AIE ADR has not been acknowledged by the MHRA for six and a half weeks. The MHRA are not adhering to and I quote the additional proactive safety monitoring plan for all COVID-19 vaccine to enable rapid analysis of safety information which is important during a pandemic. It's our government continues to vaccinate the UK population. This vaccine has emergency approval only by the MHRA. As do all of the vaccines. It has temporary authorization and it states on the government website that it should be noted that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, Pfizer, remains under review. As does the AstraZeneca vaccine. The MHRA have left over port of a possible serious adverse reaction to a vaccine resulting in death ignored for six and a half weeks. Thank you for listening. Moderna and Pfizer are both mRNA vaccines. Correct. Has this kind of mRNA vaccine technology ever been injected into humans before? This is the first time and the good news is that the results are really, really good. In essence, this is an experimental technology. Well, it's a new technology and it is proven in a very large group of clinical trials to be safe and highly effective. Are you completely positive that this new technology is safe? How can we be sure there won't be long-term effects when these vaccines were seemingly developed so quickly and have only been tested for months and not years? The speed with which it's been done is a reflection of the extraordinary advances in science and there was no compromise of safety. But as I said before, in the history of vaccinology, you don't see effects that occur years later. Almost all of the bad effects as rare as they are and they are very rare occur between 15 and 45 days from the time you get vaccinated. Last week, Catholic bishops warned the Catholic community that they should not use the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. Can you explain why? Well, some of the, some, not all because there are Catholic bishops who are saying the opposite of that. And the reason is in the preparation of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine, they used the cell line that was taken from fetal tissue from years and years to be able to produce the vaccine. That's true that there is a residual DNA from an aborted baby in the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. No, there's no residual DNA that gets injected into you at all. It's there in the preparation of the vaccine. There is no residual human fetal DNA at all. Issa. Yes. Dr Fauci. So first question, which of the COVID-19 vaccines have been officially approved by the FDA? Three of them. One from Moderna, which is the mRNA vaccine, one from Pfizer, which is another mRNA vaccine. And the other one is from J and J Johnson and Johnson, which is a little bit different. It gives the same kind of response, but it's a little bit different. So there are three vaccines that have gotten emergency use authorization from the FDA so far. There are a couple of others that are still being tested to determine if they're safe and effective. But the three that I just mentioned have been shown in very large clinical trials involving anywhere from 30,000 to 44,000 per trial was shown to be not only very efficacious but quite safe. Okay. So I asked if it was approved by the FDA, but I think that it's a different thing that an emergency use authorization than an approval. So what is the difference between an emergency use authorization and an official approval by the FDA? Yes, that's a very good question. So an emergency use authorization is based on the criteria if the benefit clearly outweighs the risk and that you get a good degree of efficacy and safety. The full licensure is when you follow it for a longer period of time and you get more information and data. I have no doubt given how very, very efficacious all three of these are that they will ultimately get the full authorization in the sense of what's called a biological license approval. But an emergency use authorization is really quite of an important step in the direction of getting the official approval. So let me give you an example of how much confidence I have in the emergency use authorization I myself got vaccinated with one of those three vaccines. Okay, so but if the vaccine is safe and effective, why you have some the FDA given any of them, the full official approval on the license? It's, you know, actually, you know, that is a very good question. There isn't like they have any problem with it. It just takes logistically a long time to get the approval. So when this is such a good product that you want to get it to people as quickly as possible because it's life saving, you give it what's called an emergency use authorization. Not that there's anything less effective in it, you just take a long time to get the full approval and rather than deprived people of getting a life saving vaccine before all of the eyes get dotted and the teeth get crossed, they give it an emergency use authorization based on a lot of solid data that it works. What is the medical and legal responsibility of the companies that are making the vaccines? What happens if secondary effects are seen, let's say in five or ten years? Can I sue the manufacturer of the product if it hurts me or if there's long-term effects, years down the road? You know, there is a fund that allows the compensation for injury, but I have to tell you, L'Hanio, that it's very, very, very unlikely that you're going to have an effect five or ten years down the pike. The reason we say that is that we have decades of experience in the field of vaccinology and virtually all of the effects if they even occur and they're very rare occur within 15 to 45 days following the dose. Each of the companies had to wait 60 days before they were able to release it to be given to the people because the most of the bad effects if they do occur and I say it's extremely rare, they almost all occur between 15 and 45 days. Then we move so fast, we took two days to design the vaccine on the computer. We took two days to design the vaccine on the computer. Why? Because we had worked on the nurse and the coronavirus with the catastrophe team for two years. We took the catastrophe team for two years. Look at a lot of proteins, I looked at new models, we knew all of the gates that our best chance of the coronavirus with all technology was the spiky as protein and we just went with it. If you look at the people who are vulnerable and you offer them the vaccine with the word offer, informed consent is important. So it's not necessary and it's an appalling misuse of a public platform. For people to suggest that the only way we all get our lives back is if we mass-fax it population, something very smelly is going on. But the main problem I have with it, as you mentioned, is this notion of being mandated, or even coerced, so you don't have to but you can't travel again, that's the sort of thing. I want your viewers to know that's illegal and for international law. But after the second world law atrocities, so if I've doctor Mengli, another doctor is in Japan where they perform experiments on humans that are their debts. We and others in the post-war consensus led to an international law that says that no medical procedure may be performed on a human being without their informed consent and they must benefit from it. In the bad of 10 other things, but that's basically it to ask me, your government doesn't have to write to override that law. So if people are saying you've got to, otherwise you can't go shopping, you can't do the work or travel, take them to court, absolutely illegal and no one should stand for it. But to say again, I'm pro, well, characterized vaccines if you're elderly, frightened, vulnerable and it's available, I would say work with your doctor, consider it, maybe you should, but everybody else, you don't need it and something very odd is going on.