A ‘Cover-Up of Evidence of Mass Murder’: The CDC Appears to Be Removing VAERS Records

Video Transcript:

I mentioned that V-save should be added to VARS, but only 4% of V-save is added. Can you explain what that means to people and why it matters? Various is designed specifically for medical professionals and people alike to report, hey, I got hurt. And when enough people have gotten hurt for officials to look at it and say, hey, this product isn't safe, it's got to come off the market. And V-save was created to also do something similar to that. And to make that process a little bit easier, you don't need as many records, you don't need as much information to record a report in V-save. And in V-save, there have been over 800,000 reports of injury. And the deal was that in V-save, every single report of injury was supposed to also then subsequently have a VAERS report associated with it. So it's all 800,000 should be in VARS. But unfortunately, or by design, however you want to look at it, only 30,000, only just over 30,000 of those 800,000 have been recorded in VARS. So what that means is that less than 4% of the records in V-save have actually been reported in VARS as they were supposed to be done. Holy cow, I have to also think again, journalistically, and as political consultant, the story never matches the goal, right? You know this, you see behind the scenes in politics. So when you've got the VARS system, it's been there for decades. You create a whole new system called V-save, right? Which I think is relatively recent, correct? And you say this is an easier way to file a complaint than that kind of cannibalizes the funnel, made for filing complaints. And then oops, you only transfer for a percent of them over to the more established database. I mean, what a sneaky way to basically sweep almost 800,000 ever-savents under the rug. Adverse events, hospitalizations, permanent injuries, deaths, yeah, yeah, compromises, data set. That's completely compromised. That's so disgusting. Let's go now to why we should... Well, this is an important question that I was asked tonight to know the answer to. At what point should 1500 deaths from one side effect trigger an investigation? Is that a signal that rises to the level of what the CDC set up there as to alert our government to? Well, if we look historically, and I think the swine flu shot was the one, I think, it's in 1976, the signal that was recorded, the bar was 50 deaths. They got to 50 deaths in a very short period of time and it was shut the whole program down. We are way past 50 deaths with just that symptom, high blood pressure involved in it. We've been way past it since really the first couple of weeks of the shots being available. I was calling for the termination of the program in January of 2021. I mean, the data, the signals were already very clear that this was going to get worse, especially as you extend it to younger and younger populations. We knew this was going to get horrific and bad and it's been worse. And so what did they do? They did what all is fair in love and war, I guess. So they said, let's do everything we can to prevent people from submitting it. Let's do everything we can to clear records. We know we've caught the CDC on at least two occasions. And now I think a third time, deleting records from VAERS, which is a federal crime, a judge informed me of last night. And then we have a situation where I was looking at myocarditis, paracarditis, nail me for every time I do a data set update. And what's been shocking to me was in September, 16th data set, we had a signal of over 45,000 cases reported to VAERS of myocarditis, paracarditis or heart inflammation, all the kind of the same thing. Well, when I went back in to do this for you and I was just like, well, let me go take a look around and see what's going on. There's been records deleted because that number dropped in September from 45,000 to now in December by December 2nd. That number dropped to, where are we, baby? Dropped to 12,544. So they've deleted over 30,000 records. They've deleted over 32,000 records from specifically with myocarditis and paracarditis. And I've tripled check this. I stand by what I'm saying right there that they are deleting records. Again, especially on the biggest safety signal that everybody's aware of. And it's not an accident that they would do this with Dr. Latapoe and Governor DeSantis coming out with that study about myocarditis and paracarditis. They are trying to do everything they can to delete records to thwart what Governor DeSantis and DeSantis, as a surgeon general in Florida, Dr. Latapoe are doing. I'm stunned. Once again, it's people like Dr. Ely doing the work that should be done by the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. I mean, this is as big as the Pentagon papers easily if indeed the CDC deleted those records. I've seen the screenshots. It looks pretty bad, right? And so you're saying that the Dr. Latapoe and Governor DeSantis calling for grand jury investigation what could be the reason that they're hiding, they're deleting these basically evidence of their crimes because Latapoe and DeSantis would be investigating that data. Is that what you're saying? Right. When you read through the grand jury petition that Governor DeSantis signed and submitted to the Florida Supreme Court, they are putting a lot of what they are their argument based upon. They're findings with myocarditis. So myocarditis, paracarditis. And that's not without good reason. So the issue is if you're the CDC now and you know you've been complicit in data fraud from day one, what do you start doing? Well, you've been deleting records for the last couple years. Why not delete the records specific for myocarditis and paracarditis to try to thwart their attempts and try to discredit their analysis of what they're doing? That's what it looks like to me right now. And that is indeed, that's many felonies. I mean, that's not just a felony in terms of data handling. That's a felony in terms of the criminal process, right? Isn't that that's covering up evidence of a crime? Well, yeah, it would be definitely any time the problem with VAERS as a federal system is yes, maybe if there is an erroneous record here or there, you know, that you should have the ability to delete it. But when you start seeing the CDC deleting hundreds of thousands of records and removing in this case over 32,000 records or at least removing the search term from the, because that's my suspicion here Naomi is that they didn't delete the record, but they deleted was that word myocarditis or paracarditis or heart inflammation in the actual report. And so that's modification of a official record. And when you do that, that's now criminal fraud again. And of course, it throws off our ability to really understand what's going on with this, because we rely on systems like this to give us information for making decisions. Well, I mean, to say the least, but with the bodies mounting up, I mean, you know, there's so many horrific stories of young healthy people, standing myocarditis, paracarditis, dropping dead, athletes dropping dead. I mean, you know, this is, I mean, mass murder and this is a cover-up of evidence of mass murder. It would appear to me, I don't think that's too strong to say. Good heavens. I do want to say one thing, elaborate on what you just said. People love digital products, but they have a fantasy about them. They don't pardon me. An algorithm doesn't have to tell you the truth, right? And what I love about what you've done in your meticulous explanation of how VAERS and CDC are using data to hide the truth. So I just want to stress to people what Dr. Yuley said is, and I made this point with elections. I can't stress it enough. You can hide or censor or conceal any evidence in a database by just changing the search terms, changing what the algorithm counts. And the algorithm is not neutral. People think it just, you know, neutrally scans the data, but that's not true. Your developer tells the algorithm what to produce when there's a search. And you really have to understand that because it means that any number of, like they could take deaths and read, you know, tell the machine to count them as fatalities. And just not list fatalities prominently or hide it, you know, to click in. And you will literally not be able to ever find the deaths. Or they could just tell the algorithm not to count certain things or to count other things twice. There is nothing verifiable about a digital database. I just want to say that really clearly. And that's why what Dr. Yuley is doing is so important because he's saying, no, we're not going to let you lie by using these very, you know, to people who work with data sets and digital databases, very obvious tricks, right? Like very transparent ways of throwing sand in the eyes of people who are trying to get at the truth. So I just want to say that. And I want to also say it if they're listening. And at some point, I hope you do listen to this. Dr. Lotapo and Governor DeSantis, you need Dr. Ely Senator Lentican, Senator Thatcher and this amazing team, which I'm proud to say includes my wonderful husband, investigator Brian O'Shea, because what you all have uncovered is absolutely stunning. And you continue to make headlines. And this latest, which you've presented, should be on the cover of every, every newspaper. And every magazine in every news site in the, in the world, this is huge. If indeed they're concealing myocarditis outcomes.