HOUR 2: JIM FETZER "Truth vs New$,INC" (8-5-19) Trump played by false flaggers?

Video Transcript:

Yes, welcome back to True Pursues News here on August 4th. It's the second hour here and it was this exciting about all the hoaxes that are going on and the election and all kinds of crazy stuff and they can't believe a word of the media saying something. And I will say that nobody's ever called us fake news and I think there's a reason for it because we got the top truth tellers here. You want to complete your thoughts? Scott? Yes, Scott. More about the candidates. Yes, and Michelle Obama and so forth. Well, I think Michelle Obama's got no hope. I think nobody can hold a candle to Trump because of his domestic policies and as long as he doesn't get us into a war, he'll win the election. 2020 will go to him. However, if he lets himself be backed into a war and a conflict and Tulsi Gabbard rises up as the peace candidate, I think it could shift in her direction. It's not that hard to run a country and as long as you stay the hell out of the way and stop the government from doing these crazy things like creating new agencies dedicated to creating or monitoring domestic terrorism, fomenting domestic terrorism by abusing citizens, this is a nightmare. So everybody who's on the Democrat platform is a loser. They're not going to win against Trump. Trump is won the debate against illegal immigration. He's won the debate of the wall. He's won the debate on environmental fanaticism and the Skigsy and Witches of Ortizio Cortez and Ilhan Omar. These lunatics have driven people into the category of conservative, right of wing, libertarian as their voters. He's done more for blacks. He's done more for just generating the economy and all of that is leading the scales or political balance to be in his favor. And I hope he's smart enough to really tighten down the latches and do good positive things to create a positive relationship with North Korea, Russia and Iran to use that against China. And then he'll be pretty much guaranteed the presidential election, not because of his own goodness, but because everybody else is so bad. But if he starts to look bad and sound like a war-mongering George Bush 2.0 and he's dedicated to going after Americans and playing a part in these false flag attacks and saying that white right-wing terrorism is our number one thing that we have to extinguish. He's going to alienate every white male in this country and then you could really see a quick and civil war. But we'll see how it goes, Jim. Why doesn't he restore the Smith-Monac at 1948, get rid of all these false flag attacks? Why doesn't he pass nationwide concealed carry, get rid of these ridiculous gun-free zones, allow everyone to protect themselves and we get rid of the absurdities that are taking place here in the United States? He really needs to because that is how he will win, I think, the majority of the people who keep in bear arms and want to keep their families safe. He's never going to win the leftist lesbian, angry, feminist, homosexual side. He may win some of the log cabin Republicans, but he's never going to win the angry side of humanity, but he is going to win the family oriented. So what you're describing, he does need to do. He needs to provide these Second Amendment protections and things like that before the election, before 2020. So he can gather all of that. I mean, if he supports this new absurd terrorist protection prevention act, I mean, that's to bring in or well, you know, on steroids. I mean, it's embarrassing that there's such a bill in the Senate, but there it is. He has to do something to oppose it, to crush it, to stop it, and not allow himself to be played by all of this political theater. There'll be a lot of act to employ here. If he doesn't do right, I mean, I mean, go ahead. Meanwhile, Andrew Yang is going to enforce censorship. Get this. He's going to have more censorship to protect us from ideas, from thinking. Andrew Yang won't even have us to have to bother to think. There you have it straight from the Horsesmouth. The New Testament policy would involve creating a new government agency to target and remove fake news. You know, as he's going to decide what's true and what's false, this is embarrassing from the Internet and replace innocent journalists with government and corporate approved. Am's Budman journalist, how disgusting is that? Meanwhile, the FBI has absurdly warned that conspiracy theories are a new domestic terrorism threat. You can find this on my blog. I had it a note of all the absurdities associated with the FBI. Now, one demanded agent wants to save us from the necessity to think because the agency will do it for us. Notice that dominant conspiracy theory in the past several years is the left-wing Russia gate allegation that Donald Trump conspired with Russia to secure his election over Hillary Clinton. Rachel Maddo has gone down big time with the Mueller report in his pathetic testimony to Congress, which was a disaster for the Democrats. Meanwhile, conspiracy theories, according to the FBI, cause extremism because here they're referring to Pizzagate, but I assure you, my research shows Pizzagate was very real. Russia gate on the other hand was not. So we've had two and a half years of Russia gate. Rachel Maddo has lost more than half of her audience because she turned out to be completely wrong. She was insisting Mueller would be the knight in shiny normal aboard a white horse that would lead to the impeachment of Trump. It all collapsed with Mueller's pathetic incompetent testimony before Congress. Meanwhile, conspiracy theories very likely will emerge spread and evolve in the modern information marketplace occasionally driving both group and individual extremists to carry out criminal or violent acts. Is even aware that Russia gate was a conspiracy theory of the weakest, most feeble kind that had no evidence supporting it and a mass of evidence contradicting it. Technology that conspiracy theory driven domestic extremists are not a new phenomenon. Many blames are increasing number and virulence on the internet and social media, not infrequent uncovering of real conspiracies or coverups involving illegal harmful or unconstitutional activities by government officials or leaking political figures is contributing to the spread of conspiracy theories, the agency acknowledges lamenting that the exposure of such plots encourages conspiracism in society. What we just want the truth just let us have the opportunity. Don't tell us don't dictate the truth just give us a chance to find it. Rather than name any real conspiracies it might be fueling the fires of these domestic extremists. The FBI mentions QAnon and Pitsingate as examples of theories motivating people to violence and warns that anti-government identity based and fringe political conspiracy theories very likely encourage the targeting of specific people places and organizations. Listening to handful of incidents where the perpetrator was apparently motivated by the belief in some fringe theory, such as the 2016 Pitsingate shooting at Kampingh Park. But that was obviously staged, that was deliberately contrived to destroy the hard disk there. They already had it shot out before he entered the building. It was all fake. Yet conspiracy theorists are far from marginal. Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe something other than the official story regarding JFK's assassination. More than half believe the governments can see and we need information about September 11th as well they should. Other conspiracy theories receive hours of mainstream news. Rushingate theorist Rachel Maddo continues to push the discredited narrative claiming President Donald Trump's campaign colluded with the Russian government to win the presidency months after the Mueller investigation concluded with no charges and no evidence. Confretted with the document the FBI's press office insisted the agency would never initiate an investigation based solely on First Amendment protected activity. As with all of our investigations the FBI can never monitor a website or a social media platform without probable cause. The FBI likes the radicalization theory because it justifies mass surveillance. Former FBI agent Michael German told Yahoo referring to the idea that perfectly normal citizens are radicalized by accessing extremist content on social media. As though you're supposed to believe everything you read I mean how absurd is that. The notion that conspiracy theories can transform people into gun wielding mad men also give social media platforms all the excuse they need to censor users even in the absence of evidence that conspiratorial content causes harm creating a symbiosis between big brother and big tech. Meanwhile Rushingate Queen range no more. Rachel Maddo rankings tank after collusion narrative implodes and well she deserved to go down with a phony story of the whole Scott. Well yeah they've damaged and traumatized the American people for two plus years with this fabulous propaganda, this psychological operation and we've described it you describe the origins of that gym right after the election with Podesta and all these these planners and the whole thing was an attempt to coup d'etat overthrow the presidency of the United States using the government agencies the FBI the Department of Justice and all of these traders that should be prosecuted and I think and I hope that we see the emergence of a political congress and joint investigation bar prosecution of these people I think this is going to this is going to take precedent and perhaps that's one of the reasons why you're seeing these false flag distraction operations to pull people away to pull them in a direction of fear so that they don't increase in their hostility and their aggression and their outrage over what has been done to them over the past few years. All of this nonsense all of these lies about Russia and the Russia gate and the President being a traitor and a puppet and all of this disgusting deception really if the American public really got it down into their gut would be would be outraged to the point where you would see blood on the streets you would see reporters and news magazines and all of these newspapers and agencies you really could see buckets of blood thrown against their corporate logos and their their buildings vandalized you really could have an awakening of the American people to the to the sea very clearly that what Donald Trump says you are fake news and he and he hisses at them and he cheers at them with the hostility and a venom and an angry anger in a resentment it is it is truthful and it is their anger and resentment and venom and when the American people make that collection connection you really could have some violence and blood on the streets against these media because they have intentionally done this gym they have lied they have corrupted they have betrayed the faith and the right to broadcast to the American people they have not spoken truth they have an advanced their own political agenda Rachel Maddow is a raving lunatic lesbian who is out to lunch she is a fascist as all Democrats are so they are trying to promote a government that cracks down and in fascistically manhandles people that is what this 804 is all about creating a domestic terrorism agency to fascistically knock on people's doors watch their web pages do what we have seen the honor network do write lies and report and shut down people's youtube pages this is this is getting this is the potential of getting a ugly very fast but I think the Trump prosecution of these people in the fake russugate situation needs to be quickened it needs to constantly be stated until 2020 so that the American people don't lose side of the fact of this grand psychological manipulation that was trying to be forced upon them Jim. I just wanted to say we're cooking done taking down a Mueller I mean the way he sold them pulled it and that goes way back I think the FBI who was a left road that's been corrupt since they went with who I mean it's been it's our pattern of practice and these guys FBI CIA they're not for the American way that we know or let me think we know we don't have it and then you got it right now and you got it right. Meanwhile a judge's ruling is throwing a huge spanner into the US extradition proceedings against Julian Assange this is rather fascinating a US judge's rule that WikiLeaks was fully entitled to publish the DNC emails which means that no law was broken the ruling is highly significant because it could impact on the US extradition against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as well as the imprisonment of his ablour Chelsea Manning the ruling on 30 July federal judge John Cotell ruled on a case brought against WikiLeaks and other parties in regard to the alleged hacking of DNC emails and concluded if WikiLeaks could be held liable for publishing documents concerning the DNC's political financial and voter engagement strategy simply because the DNC labels them secret and trade secrets and so could any newspaper or other media outlet in other words if WikiLeaks is subject to prosecution then every media outlet in the world would be the judge argued that the first amendment prevents such liability in the same way it would include liability for press outlets that publish material of public interest despite defects in the way the materials were obtained so long as the discriminator did not participate in any wrongdoing in obtaining the materials in the first place significantly the judge added it's not criminal to solicit or welcome stolen documents and how a person is entitled to publish stolen documents that the publisher requested from a source so long as a publisher did not participate in the theft. Jen Robinson a member of a Sons legal team described that judge ruling has an important win for free speech in important win for free speech we have one our motion to dismiss WikiLeaks and the DNC lawsuit against his son this is indeed very significant US WikiLeaks lawyer Joshua Gratel said he was very gratified with his which reaffirms first amendment principles that apply to journalists across the board whether they work for large institutions or small independent operations prior to the ruling the ACLU as party to a briefing to the court meanwhile time magazine reports a quinter pack go out Wednesday found 33% of Americans see Barack Obama as the worst president since World War 2 his lesson three years since Obama left office and already liberal media outlets are forced to report the truth that he's considered to be the worst president in the last 74 years and when you consider that that time included Jimmy Carter those poll results recumb truly staggering so why would a majority of Americans feel this way could it be the if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor lie before dead Americans and been gauzy the 40 mind blowing quotes from him regarding Islam versus Christianity maybe it was a time he released five Taliban terrorists exchange for US Army Deserter Bowie McDowell the time he put kids in cages at the border or it could have been his last official act when he gave 221 million to the Palestinian Authority to help them fund terrorism against Israel except I agree with supporting the Palestinian Authority they're not funding terrorism against Israel they're supporting the Palestinian people well I'm at a loss I guess I don't know why a majority of Americans consider Barack Obama the worst president since World War 2 he is the worst president from time the quinter pack poll found 33% of ground Obama the worst postwar president just eight percent concern the best about a 28% see George W Bush as a worse next and the only president ever to resign was worse by 13% only according to the ball 45% think the US would have been better off if Mitt Romney had been elected president in 2012 or 38% the country would have been worse off Obama gets negative grades for his handling the most issues negative 40 to 55% for the economy negative 37 to 57% on foreign policy negative 40 to 58 on health care negative 50 to 40 for the environment negative 44 to 51 for terrorism Ronald Reagan was the most common answer among those surveyed for the best presidents since World War 2 with 35% choosing the Republic an icon another 18% chose Bill Clinton and 15% John F Kennedy Scott well I think you're you're witnessing the revelation that Trump is probably going to be compared to a Reagan Roosevelt Teddy Roosevelt not Franklin Roosevelt you know political Renaissance in America as long as he sticks to the domestic economic revitalization of the American culture that's what has been washed down and and and totally disintegrated over the last 50 years was the American industrial base and the manufacturing and the domestic culture I mean it was almost like grapes of wrath where you know Steinbeck's novel depicted the American farmers in Oklahoma being driven off their land by a combination of the dust bowl and bankers and caterpillar tractors well it's almost like our own industrial manufacturing base and the classic Americana culture that is you know rich in songs like John Mellon camps and Bruce Springsteens and even though they're nostalgic and kind of delusional to a certain extent people gravitated love that and that's been sold to China it's been transferred to Mexico it was part of the graft and the corruption and the enrichment of the Clintons in the 90s who knows how many child sexual predatory sacrifices Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton were given and guaranteed in exchange for a lot of these promises we know Vince Foster met in better nubbly end we also know other people like Ron Brown the Secretary of Labor met a very mysterious end and and his plane running into a mountain top despite the air being clear and a store desk dying when she was originally found alive the Clintons are enmeshed with a lot of this corruption and it was all globalists so Trump by showing and being firm against China is firmly saying the American public the American worker the American industrial manufacturing basis what I want to bring back and at the same time he has to he has to do what Reagan did which is make a solid firm commitment that the only way you're going to stop domestic terrorism and people being domestic terrorists and shooting up places and stuff number one you stop the FBI and the Department of Justice in these rogue agencies from doing false flag attacks which this sounds like it is but you you give the responsibility for defense back to local communities and you emphasize the protection of families and you do not let the Department of Education forcibly vaccinate mandate the vaccination and the retardation of an entire population of kids through antidepressant drugs and all of the other perversions and abuses that we have made legal since the 1980s we have we've created a schizophrenic America by our big farmer medicalization and breakup of the family and we've we've disintegrated in our own local economies and at the same time we've launched into this international militarism which has sought to knock over every regime and try and bastardize and prostitute them and and still you know still natural resources all of which I think has been very very detrimental to us and I don't think you know all of these replays on Turner Classic movies are a substitute for a a real American you know character a virtue and promise I think those days are sadly that's all a mirage and the picture Dory and Gray is very stark Jim. Yeah, I was standing. I was standing. Scott. We're very good. Meanwhile Pompeo has ulterior motives in expressing a desire to travel to Iran. It's clear US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in expressing a desire to travel to Iran maybe to be interviewed by Iranian news media according to American political analyst Keith Preston. Meanwhile we had John Bolton claiming that the foreign minister for Iran is an illegitimate spokesperson for Iran that could very well be said of John Bolton who is more obviously a legitimate spokesman for the United States. Meanwhile the US Treasury Department imposes sanctions on Iranian foreign ministers are ref interviewed by our own Scott Bennett. He made many very important points. Here we have the US sanctioning Iranian banks don't believe American lies about Iran. The United States under President Trump has been wavering in all out economic and diplomatic war against Iran in a recent video posted by the US Department of State on social media. White House special envoy on Iran Brian Hook talked about US sanctions trying to dismiss the fact that the unilateral measures have targeted ordinary Iranians. We did some fact checking on those array. Meanwhile Scott Bennett US UK using out Baghdadias and excuse for operations in Libya. Scott Bennett former US military psychological warfare officer says as the NATO attack oil rich stable and secure Libya in 2011 on fake reports of terrorist moves in the country the US and the UK are following the same policy to remain active in the African country. Scott made so many excellent points here. I want to recapture them here. The US and UK forces are in Libya allegedly hunt for Al Big Daddy the head of ISIS. Why do you think Al Big Daddy should be in Libya as a country become a Dan Attaris? To this day the destruction of the Libyan state and the moon market off he remains one of the greatest pork rimes in tragedies moted in the history of the United States as well as of NATO. The single event was resulted in thousands of migrants, refugees and displaced persons sailing across the Mediterranean and flooding into Europe resulting in tremendous strain on European countries which is contributed to the inevitable breakup of the European Union and the rise of center right wing governments in Germany, Sweden, Hungary, Britain and soon to be France. Since Al Big Daddy was most likely an Israeli most sought operative the US CIA would be fully complicit in his war crimes. Most likely US and UK are using Al Big Daddy as an excuse for operations in Libya and a kind of kabuki theater or play of shadows. How do you view stability encountered terrorism measures in Gaddafi's Libya? One of the greatest revelations about Libya came from American business people who were on the ground in Libya during the time of the invasion. These Americans James and Joanne Moriore of Texas worked in the oil business and personally witnessed the Saudi Arabian and Katari efforts to generate propaganda fake news that falsely gave the impression Gaddafi was harming civilians. In fact it was a Saudi Arabian agent, mercenaries and terrorists using money supplied by Qatar that were committing horrific war crimes in Libya and tried to murder the Americans who in Libya falsely blamed Gaddafi. Sadly the American CIA and FBI and other government officials in America have tried to cover up this reality in the attack and attempted murder of American civilians in Libya by Saudi Arabian Qatar. Currently there are 29 CIA training centers in Libya or were a few years back and confirmed in OGS official that there was an electrician winning the wiring those locations. So yes, terrorism training via the CIA is the reality of today's Libya. Why was Libya attacked if it was a secure and rich country? Libya was a country of low population with a very high standard of living and was an institution an asset rich. Gaddafi was about to transform the water system in Libya and also take the nation, make the nation a true paradise. The original cost for the attack in Libya was the African bank, Gold De Nare for all of Africa. The Zionists could not survive with that kind of competition. So Gaddafi was killed in the African bank clothes. NATO's intervention in Libya was not only a horrific war crime but was in fact a stunt or act of political cover to stop Libya from adopting a Gold De Nare based currency and leave the US dollar. Additional French PM Sikorsky and Brian P. M. Cameron as well as American officials like John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio were involved in the theft of millions of dollars from Libya's falls. In fact, it's been reported that each political official came to Libya for supporting photographs of the over-throwing new government was paid $10 million each making the war on Libya a lucrative business Scott Well done. Well, excellent. Well, I hope it goes down as one of the reasons that President Trump is shifting his situation in Libya. Libya is changing for the better now. You have the original tribes and independent leaders rising up and overthrowing the CIA puppet that's there and I think that is going to gain ground and they're going to be rejecting the Israeli, Kazarian, Turkish violence that allowed a lot of that to spill over and start in first place. And let's always remember that WikiLeaks is one of the few publications that is given the American people the truth to understand these things and report these things. And I'm just commenting on Julian Assange in this court hearing that is the best thing that could happen but of course a better thing would be for Donald Trump to get smart enough and recognize Julian Assange can testify as a material witness and provide the material evidence to the greatest crimes of the century that Hillary Clinton, Obama, Eric Holder, Lanny Brewer, all of these cast of characters were involved with and in prosecuting these crimes and exposing it he can redeem the reputation of the United States. So WikiLeaks and Julian Assange by bringing a lot of this material from Libya and Syria and combining it with Snowden's information as well as Brad Berkenfeld's and all the other whistle blowing reports that came out that the Clinton machine was trying to bury Trump can find his own reputation is brought back to health Jim. Excellent, excellent, excellent. Meanwhile, whoever is on Israel's side where against Erdogan Slamz Netanyahu and US over Palestinian killings, Perkish President, Resef Erdogan has condemned Israel and its enabling allies over State Terror in Palestine declaring whoever is on Israel's side let everyone know that we are against them. We do not approve of silence on the terror state that Israel blatantly carries out the State Terror that Israel blatantly carries out in Palestine, Erwin, said on Sunday, addressing senior professional officials of his justice and development party in Ankara, according to Iranian press TV. Erwin has been a fierce critic of Israeli Prime Minister BB Netanyahu and his government denouncing the PM currently mired in multiple corruption and bribery roads as the thief who's heads Israel in a tyrant who slaughtered seven-year-old Palestinian kids earlier this year. When Israel adopted the controversial Jewish State war, Erwin likened the move to the Hitler spirit risen again among some Israeli officials. However, his latest comments could also be interpreted as a digit washing and after the US suspended Turkey from the F-35 fighter jet, which is itself a Turkey condemning its purchase of Russian made S-400 missile systems which are sensational as a betrayal of NATO security and threats. Israeli military forces killed 56 Palestinian children in injured nearly 2,700 in the context of demonstrations, clashes, search and arrest operations in 2018, according to a UN report released on Friday that, like many UN fact-finding missions before it urged Israel to end the excessive use of force. The number of children killed was a high since 2014 when Israel waged its most recent one-sided war against Gaza. The UN Security Council attempted to denounce Israel's demolition of 10 Palestinian apartment buildings in the Wadi-Humas area of Jerusalem last week, drafting a resolution that condemned the destruction for undermining the viability of the two-state solution in the prospect for just and lasting peace only alas for the US to veto the move. Meanwhile, Israeli lawmaker proclaimed this policy of Jewish race. A lawmaker from the ruling Le Kud Party said Wednesday that the Jewish race is the smartest in the world and possessed of the highest human capital, which is why he said the Israeli public did not buy into the allegation of wrongdoing by Prime Minister Bibi Niyahu. M.K. Mickey Zohar made the comments during the radio debate with veteran political journalist Dan Murgol about the corruption investigation of which Niyahu is either a suspect or has given testimony. Siding recent opinion polls at Joe Niyahu and joined strong support despite being a suspect in three graft investigations Zohar argued that the media focus on the probe is not convinced the Israeli public that the Prime Minister is unsuitable to lead the country. I can tell you something very basic Zohar said during the radio 103 FM debate. You can't fool the Jews no matter what the media writes. The public in Israel is a public that belongs to the Jewish race and the entire Jewish race is the highest human capitalist, smartest, the most comprehendable. The public knows what the Prime Minister is doing for the country and how excellent he is at his job. In a follow-up interview with Hattishat TV news Zohar at first denied he'd spoken about the supremacy of the Jewish race, but presented with a recording of his earlier comments doubled down and reiterated the Jewish people and the Jewish race are the highest human capital that exists. What can you do? We were blessed, my God. I would continue to say that at every opportunity you said, I don't have to be ashamed about the Jewish people being the chosen people, the smartest, most special people in the world. Zohar cited the many innovation that his discoveries made by Jews and said that Israel had achieved more than 70 years span that some people had in thousands of years. You can understand why we usually win a lot of Nobel prize at sentiments by the way that were well reflected by Menachem Beggin among many other Israeli PMs, including his statement, our race is the master race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. Other races are decent animals, cattle at best. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. The masses will lick our feet and serve as our slaves. And I want to know, is a vodka-tronk going to condemn Jewish supremacy theories as well as white supremacy theories? Inquiring minds want to know. Scott. Well, there's nothing to get your eye up in the here's nonsense in such racial arrogance. I mean, if I could launch into a similar argument of racism and say, you know what, the Scottish race are the superior. The Scottish race are the better fighters. The Scottish race have invented more stuff in this world than any Jew, any Israeli, and I don't combine the two. The Scottish race are a better killers and fighters and they're better looking at everything. I mean, if you want to get into genetics of a population, I'll always match the Scottish against anybody. But I don't do that because, you know, in a sense, God made all men out of a hamsham, a japa, the Noah, and a man on Noah's Ark, and of course, the lineage of Christianity is essentially from Adam to Christ in the end of Revelation is a spiritual, it's a spiritual bloodline. It's got nothing to do with a genetic bloodline, and that's where the great Christian Zionism has lost its reality. And these idiots like Benachem Begin, up there, just spouting out nonsense, adds to the disgust and the revulsion and the fury against people like that. How dare you, even, but they do dare because no one confronts them. I would of course, and all of America would, that sort of nonsense is what is going to, I think perhaps in these last days and times, is the world goes through some major birth pangs of rumors of war and war, you're going to see people who espouse these beliefs like Benachem Begin in this nonsense, you know, aggressively trying to advance it, and they're going to stir up more conflicts. They're going to be killed. They're going to erupt this. So, you know, the supremacy of these Jewish lecude party types, accusing, you know, themselves as being the master race, well, you know, where's your swastika? Where's your brown shirt? Where's your Gestapo sculling bones on the hat? Because that's what you're espousing. I don't think people are going to tolerate that for much longer. And if Trump is not careful, Trump is going to find himself on the wrong side of history because this sort of racial stoking and religious arrogance in this sense of Israel first, I sense this thing is a powder keg ready to blow because everything that America has been doing in the Israeli theater has been against American interests and values. It is not in our interest to go into Saudi Arabia and wage a war against Yemen. How many, how many millions of dollars and kids have been killed? It's not in our interest to be in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's not in our interest to go against Syria. Dick Blacks, Senator Dick Black was over there and he met with Peshara Assad, so it's also gambored. And he said, Scott, the Syrians and President Peshara Assad are not the ones who are killing the Christians over there. It is the Israelis, it is the Saudi Arabians. They're the ones who were going into the churches and flucking out the eyes of the Mary statues and digging up the tile and destroying the churches. It is the Wahabi Saudi Arabians and the Israeli-Lakud fanatics and any Christian that's gone over to Israel will always say the worst treatment that they've ever gotten has been from the Jews in Israel, not from the Palestinians, not from the Arabs. It is the Jews over there who have exactly that mindset of Manakim Begin, not all of them, but that is almost a national policy over there. And for that reason, Israel is not an ally or a friend of the United States. It is, in fact, an abusive corrupt regime that is simply trying to exploit the United States as 9-11, the great 9-11 episode proved. And I think all of that is still, there's a lot more to still come out about that, Jim. But I'll just say, I think it will. And I think Americans as Sbrowski said, Alan Sbrowski, when they realized the level that Israel was involved in 9-11, Israel very well could be turned into a sheet of glass, Jim. Yeah, and about time maybe. Yeah, and if something else, who said that the Jews are the most superior? Where is that really authenticated? What can they base that on for a fact? Now it's all hype. Yeah, I want to just play the moon landing hoax to rest once and for all with a simple and possible demonstration. This is supposed to be an Apollo photo of Earth from the moon. Look, the relative size of the Earth and the moon. Earth should have been overwhelmingly larger than the moon. What they did was to take photos from Earth of the moon and portray the moon by photoshopping as though Earth. If you want to know more about it, check out the second edition of our book. And I suppose we didn't go to the moon either, which Amazon is also banned. And in the time that remains, I want to take us back to this absolutely sensational interview and play as much as we can of what she has to say here. Okay. Okay. Herokane is crimes. If they haven't caught the perpetrator, it looks really bad on them and they don't end up keeping their jobs and they don't get reelected. So it is a big problem that prosecutors and DAs often, I don't know how often, but often enough for it to be a bit of a problem, will blame crimes on innocent people. And often those people are people of color. Now this person has requested the DNA tests. Now the DNA tests are finally being taken and the evidence is going to be looked at. But this guy, you know, well, Tulsi Gabbard proved to the world that she is not in fact a pacifist and Kamala Harris proved to the world that she is a one trick pony. We have lost there. Sorry. I showed when Kamala Harris, when it was thrown back to her, she basically just said, look, I'm proud of my record. I was serving a state of 40 million people. We transformed the criminal justice system. We did a lot of work and I'm proud of it, which is fine if you're not running on a campaign of, you know, I'm here to serve civil rights and justice for black and brown people, which has been her entire campaign. She says that, you know, Shirley Chuzalm is her idol and and who is this wonderful, fantastic, congressman who really fought for economic justice and racial justice back in the 70s and 60s and 70s. So if you're running on that message of, I'm a civil rights activist and yet you're throwing people in prison and you're keeping people behind bars and you're using inmates for fire fights, it doesn't really bow well, right? It doesn't, it's not really consistent, but nothing Kamala Harris has said so far has been consistent with her campaign. She's been the biggest flip flipper of this entire campaign so far. I'm surprised she's doing as well as she has, considering how big of a flip flipper she is on the issues. She hasn't held firm to anything, even busing, even when she went after Joe Biden for busing, she went on AP news a couple of days later and she was interviewed and said that, well, you know, actually she she agrees with the fact that it shouldn't be federally mandated, which Joe Biden held her, you know, he called her out on that during the debates last night. So the woman is just a giant flip flipper. Now, what this really exposed about Kamala Harris is that she has spent her entire career as a prosecutor, meaning she has sat on one side and her job has been to point fingers and a place blame on everybody else. That's been the job. So what Tulsi Gavrid exposed is that she cannot take any hits. She just simply can't. So that Kamala Harris, because she's this prosecutor, she's going to, you know, she's going to go in there and she's going to go after Trump and she's going to go hard. Well, you know, part of the debates and part of campaigns that Trump gets to hit you back. And that's not normal for a prosecutor. The the person that's sitting on the stand through spacing charges doesn't get to turn around and start looking into the prosecutor's life. They don't get to examine the prosecutor and put them on the stand and put them on trial. That's not the way it works. So Kamala Harris has never been on that side of it. And now she is. And what is she shown? She's shown that she can't she can't fight back. She has no real standing ground. I saw an article in CNN saying, or maybe it was, oh, you know, all the news sites. It's been really interesting because they've really put out a lot of pieces supporting Tulsi Gavrid taking Kamala down and then going after Tulsi and and supporting Kamala. It's been really interesting to see the dynamic in the mainstream news. It's been kind of refreshing that they haven't all been taking Kamala's side. But one of them said she had a glass jaw and that is absolutely right. She she does. She has a glass jaw. Now after the debates, here's what I mean. Kamala Harris launches an attack on on Tulsi after the debates. Now she couldn't think on her feet during the debates because she's not used to being this position. But after the debates, she said two things that really stood out here. I mean, listen, I this is going to sound immodest, but I'm obviously a top tier candidate. And so I did expect that I would be on the stage and take hits tonight because there are a lot of people that are trying to make the stage for the next debate. Yeah, she would be on the mature dog. Well, yeah, and especially when people are at zero, one percent or whatever she might be at. And so I did expect that I might take hits tonight. But you know, listen, I think that this coming from someone who has been an apologist for an individual Assad who has murdered the people of his country to like cockroaches. She who has embraced and been an apologist for him in a way that she refuses to call him a work criminal. I can only take what she says in her opinion so seriously. And so I, you know, I'm prepared to move on. What a bitch. I'm sorry. I mean, look, the first thing she says is this is going to sound immodest, but she's a zero to one percent and I'm a top tier candidate. So of course, she's going to do what she can to try to take me down. I mean, yeah, that did sound immodest, Kamala. And secondly, then she goes and says, and you know, I can't take the opinion of an Assad apologist all that seriously a man who murdered his people like cockroaches. Now, some people I saw on the news today in the mainstream were saying that Kamala Harris, you know, yeah, okay, maybe on the debate stage, she didn't want to hit Tulsi Gabbard about a son on the debate stage and people were saying, and I can understand why she wouldn't want to do that. And so instead, she did it later on on cable news. But the truth is Kamala didn't think about this. This came from her press secretary. So let me show you. During the debates, her press secretary was tweeting in Sam's and while this was going on, he tweeted this, yo, you love Assad hashtag dem debate. So this was coming directly from her press secretary. He went on to tweet during the debates. He retweeted this one from Michael Colbruto. It's an honor if Tulsi Gabbard, the friend of Syrian dictator and murderer of Bashar al-Assad is attacking you. He continued to tweet throughout the night. It's a lie offered up by an Assad apologist when when Kat Stafford wrote, we can Tulsi Gabbard hit Kamala Harris's prosecution record pretty hard. When you were in a position to make a difference in people's lives, you did not. Gabbard hashtag dem debate too. He also shortly after the debate wrote, knowing that the backlash was coming, tweeted this out. Reporters writing their stories with eyes on the modern day assignment desk of Twitter read this quote, the Russian propaganda machine that tried to influence the 2016 election is now promoting the presidential aspirations of a controversial Hawaii Democrat. And you will be claiming that Tulsi Gabbard was being supported by Russians. Now her campaign in Sam's has continued the attacks today on his Twitter account. He has gone nonstop the last high check. He was still tweeting about this right now. And she's continued to go on the defensive. I saw Kamala Harris earlier today on CNN. Again, talking about Assad again talking about the fact that that Tulsi Gabbard met with Assad. And that has then been the trending the the trendy discussion on Twitter, the trending discussions in mainstream news. And again, you know, like I mentioned in my last video, if you didn't watch it, mainstream news is not real news. Mainstream news is looking for ratings. They're sensational. They're looking for headlines that get clicks. It's clickbait. It's it's it's meant to get viewers attention. So they focus on anything that is going to be attention grabbing. Now I want to play this last clip for you. This is an exchange. Tulsi has been making the rounds today. And she was on MSNBC. And this one got pretty heated as she was being asked about meeting with Assad. I'm going to play this whole clip for you. Look, you know, I want to break this down to what we're talking about. I'm not going to say I just don't know. I'm talking about it. I'm not here today because you're talking about a meeting that took place three years ago. And every time I remember that, no, every time I come back here on MSNBC, you guys talked to me about these issues. It sounds like these are talking points that Kamala Harris and her campaign are telling you because she's refusing to address the questions. I was on my that were for the American people to have context about your foreign policy issues and where you stand. If you're leading with I would love to provide that conversation. I'm meeting with Richa Ralesan, which I'm sure you understand is a very controversial meeting to take. Hence the reason why when you come on MSNBC, it is important for us to talk to you about the, of course, every anchor has a different perspective and different questions to ask every single time for three years. This is where the propaganda comes in because I've talked about this a lot for the last three years and I've talked about how as a soldier, I served in a field medical unit in Iraq where every single day I saw the very high human cost of war. Every single day, the first thing that I did was go through a list named by name of every single American casualty and hip and injury that had occurred the day before. So I will not apologize to you or to anyone, anyone for doing all that I can, all that I can to prevent our country from continuing to make these perpetual wrong decisions that have taken a toll on the lives of my brothers and sisters in uniform. I will continue to do all that I can to make sure that we end these wasteful regime change wars that have taken such a toll on all of us and that have made our country less safe. And if that means having a meeting with a dictator, if that means trying to meet with Kim Jong-un and North Korea to de-escalate tensions and remove this nuclear threat from our country and our people, whatever the crisis is, we've got to have a leader with the courage to do the right thing for the American people, putting their interests ahead of everything else. That is what I'm focused on. There's no way that's what the center of my foreign policy and the leadership that I'll bring as president. I certainly am not asking you to apologize for a service. I'm very thankful for your service. At that, I don't think anybody is asking you no apologize for your service. This is more a conversation and asking you questions to explain the decisions that you've made in the past and the statements that you've made in the past with your guards, your foreign policy views as you are running for president of the United States. Congresswoman, I thank you for your time. Pulsie Gabbard, very much appreciate it. Your time. I mean, look, that whole exchange was very heated. Tulsie, multiple times said, let me finish. I really liked that. Tulsie was showing a bit more spirit. I could tell that she was way more annoyed about this. I know she is probably, I don't know, but I would imagine that she's very annoyed by these attacks. This once again digging up the meeting with the Saad. To me, the meeting with the Saad is a no-brainer. If the man invites you to meet you go, if you're a member of Congress, it is your obligation to go and meet with these leaders around the world. I saw people saying, well, no, no, that's the job of the president, that she shouldn't have gone without, some people were saying without presidential authorization. Excuse me, let me give you a little civics lesson. The United States Congress is an equal but separate branch of government, equal to the branch of the executive, equal to the United States president, and they're separate. They have to do their checks and balances. Part of the problem as to why we've marched into all of these regime change wars is because all too often are other branches of government that should have been doing checks and balances just believed everything they were told. It is absolutely the responsibility of congressional members to go and do their due diligence. They are the body that declares war. They are the body that gives the authorization to the president to go into armed conflict. So yeah, it is her job to go and do that. And if she's going and checking out what is going on a series, which by the way, hardly any journalists have done and very few of our congressional leaders or any leaders have gone, people aren't going. They're just listening to what they're hearing and what they're saying and they're believing it. And Tulsi Gabbard with all of the honor integrity that she has as a person decides that she is going to go and find out for herself rather than believe the narratives because you know what? Do you remember Iraq? Do you remember weapons of mass destruction? You would be an idiot, honestly, and a genuine idiot. If you genuinely just would say, well, you know what? Let's just go ahead and trust everything again. You know that there were no weapons of mass destruction. We know this. So why would you? Why would you believe any other narratives without doing the investigating yourself? Especially if you're a member of the United States Congress, that is your job. Tulsi Gabbard does her job. And then people scream about it. They can't believe that she's doing her job. They just can't believe. They want her to believe the executive branch and the Pentagon and the people that marched us into Iraq. That's what you want, honestly, honestly. I mean, that just doesn't make any sense to me. So these attacks about Assad, guys, you know, you need to get over it because you're the reason we've continued to have all of the wars time and time again. And it's not just the war since 9-11 that we've been in for the last nearly 20 years. It was the wars before that. It was the war that tore my family up in Vietnam. It was all of these wars that we've marched around and all of the regime changes that we have engaged in, all of the destabilizing that we have done. And it is because people believe, maybe you're one of those people who actually just believes that, yeah, you know what, these bad dictators need to be taken out. We've got to go and save the people. Yeah, like we did in Libya, right? We took out Gaddafi because that, well, he was really bad. He was like Bashar al-Assad. He was so bad. And now look at what's going on in Libya. They have an open slave market. The people are not better off in Afghanistan. When we went into topple, the government that was being backed by the Russians, general, I told you, Gabriel, backed by the Russians, the people in Afghanistan, their government was backed by the Russians. We went in there in the 70s. We armed the Mujahideen who ended up becoming Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. And we left Afghanistan with the Taliban. We left those women who were previously liberated under the Taliban where they could no longer get an education after the age of eight, where they could no longer see a doctor because the doctor was male. And well, women can't get education after eight. So women just die. That is what we do. And then when you want to sit there and continue to advocate for this by saying, well, no, you better call him a dictator. You better call him a brutal dictator. Why can't you just say it? Why can't you just say it? You know why? Because the minute you say it, you're implying that we need to go to war. That is what you're implying. You're implying that we need to go and take them out and leave the Syrian people in the hands of the radicals that infiltrated the country that had been destabilized. And we're ready to take over the same way the Taliban took over Afghanistan. That would be on you. So, shame on all of these people on Twitter who cannot learn a lesson, who apparently can't read history books or the news or do research or understand that the United States has engaged in pretty dismal foreign policy for quite some time. Shame on you. And good for Tulsi Gabbard for standing or ground and never backing down and not being a flip floppy wishy washi like Kamala Harris. You know, very, very proud of Tulsi and how she is, how she is stood up for us. She stood up for us. Scott, wasn't that sensational? Wasn't that simply sensational? Oh, outstanding, outstanding. Isn't that wonderful? And Tulsi was samsay. I mean, I've never fallen in love with a presidential candidate before. I tell you, I'm in love. Well, some enchanted evening, you may see a Hawaiian girl across an internet. She says that speech. If she says that speech about her brothers and sisters, she won the foreign policy debate. And if she acts like a moderate Republican, you know, stopping the border, but, you know, making a moderate compromise for the people that have lived here, she'll win that issue. And if she says, I want America great again, you know, and uses different words about getting our manufacturing back. I mean, she could win. If she goes back to what blue dog Democrats are about, she'll win unless Trump does exactly the same thing and fulfills the original promise that he promised, which was, get us out of these wars that Tulsi's talking about. She's right on the money. And the Asian girl there is perfect. And she embodies what we've been talking about, particularly in California, that it is the Asians in California, the Vietnamese, the Chinese, the Hindus, the Cambodians, the Sikhs, who are going to be the family values common sense clear-minded political force that rises up in America, particularly California, and returns our country to sanity. The white liberal leftists and the androgenist cast traded, you know, white Christians in American society are gone. They're the ones who've pushed all this LGBT and women, and men pretending they're girls and running in track races against girls. All of that did not come from the Asians or the Hindus or the Sikhs. It came from white leftists. They are the poison that I think the new conservative minority population like her is recognizing, and they're getting their voice to articulate. Perfect Scott Don, take this. Oh, well, was this ever a proof that lady with something else in Tulsa is a sweetheart, a very astute person. And so you've been watching, two-thirds of the news here in August fourth, I think it's been one heck of a good two-hour spent. I think we alert a lot about truth, it really has been full of the size. And so we've got it great. So I'm going to just say thank you so much for watching folks who are out of here. See you next week.