HOW SCHOOLS SEXUALIZE YOUR CHILDREN

Video Transcript:

you Not so long ago, our children went to school to be educated, not indoctrinated, reading, writing, arithmetic. When it came to the thorny topic of sex education, it was traditionally a teacher's job to equip children with the basics to allow them to stay safe from unwanted pregnant disease, sexually transmitted diseases and sexual predators. A most most parents were happy to leave the birds and the beads stuffed to the teachers. Sex education wasn't compulsory, leaving some parents a choice to opt out. However, in the new hyper-sexualized culture of 21st century Britain, a perfect storm of fear and opportunity has arisen. The new way for activists and sex-positive liberals is an opportunity not just to educate and inform children, but to sexualize and radicalize them. Unbeknownst to many parents, our children's education has become riddled with unproven, unscientific, radical, sexual identity politics. The Declaration of Pronouns is enforced with rigor, rejecting biology in favour of gender theory is the new normal. Exposing ever younger children to complicated ideas about sexuality is becoming an imperative. In particular, PSHE or personal social health and economic education, which includes relationships and sex education, RSE has become a horror show. Sex education is a good example that used to happen in secondary school. The Conservative government for some reason pushed through RSE as a replacement for sex ed, and now we have relationships and sex ed all into one bracket, which means it's been pushed further down into primary school. We now have primary kids being taught about masturbation, which I think is inappropriate, and I think most parents would. But this is the slippery slope, isn't it? There's no age appropriateness anymore. Drag queens, whose very names are often laden with sexually near window, are routinely invited to read books to primary-age school children. This is Miss Diva, one of the performers involved in Bristol's drag queen story time. In Impasley, a drag queen named Flowjob was invited to read books at Glencoats Primary School. Following a parental outcry when Flowjob's highly sexualized social media history was uncovered, SMP MP Mari Black, who was with Flowjob at the School of End, lashed out, accusing those with concerns of, yes you guessed it, homophobia. Mari said she completely applauded the school for putting on such a great day. Last summer in London, a Labour council invited a rainbow dildo bot monkey to host children's reading groups in libraries. Drag queen story hour, which does exactly what it says on the tin, has now become a huge growth industry in our schools. However, the apprehension of having drag queens perform to young children is also shared by some drag queens themselves. I have no idea why you want drag queens to read books to your children. I have no idea. A drag queen performs in a nightclub for adults. There is a lot of filth that goes on, a lot of sexual stuff that goes on. And backstage there's a lot of nudity, sex and drugs. Okay, so I don't think that this is an avenue you would want your child to explore. Would you want a stripper or a porn star to influence your child? And then you just move your pub up and down like that, and that's twerking. Six years ago. As the outcry about drag queens and schools grows, efforts by the left and the educational establishment to get them into schools will become increasingly aggressive. Taking the lead from New York City where Mayor Eric Adams pledged to continue the practice even after it was revealed the city had spent over $200,000 on drag queen events for young children. These extra curricular activities are bad enough. The most worrying of all is the British curriculum itself, which now teaches children as young as four about masturbation, consent and the chilling concept of good secrets. So this education comes from the World Health Organization, United Nations, Seek Us, the Kinsey Institute. The first thing that that startled me made me aware was the early childhood masturbation from age not to four. Now that you know, I'm a criminologist, so child sex, about an exploitation, I might feel so I want to know who is saying children as sexual from birth, who is saying children have masturbate from birth. Straight off for the beginning, for the four year olds, they were actually learning about masturbation, which is now spoken about is called self-stimulation. So we discovered this in 241 schools in England. The self-stimulation has a party at disclosure, which means it prevents children from disclosing a boost. Basically, programs all children in the whole of the country away from what we call a non-verbal disclosure. When it goes on, we look at children at a taught to behave sexually in a non-offensive way, whatever that means. They tell people body parts, it is not head shoulders, knees and toes, it is nipples, scroked and vulva. In secondary schools, the menu is even more ex-rated, as pupils are taught about anal sex, facial ejaculation and bondage. Many parents are starting to ask questions at school and the schools are saying we cannot share the resources with you because they are under copyright. And we are not prepared to share them with you. First of all, that is a lie. To share the resources with a parent is perfectly acceptable and any school that uses copyright is excused not to show parents what they are teaching their children should be questioned further. Each and every parent, if they go into their school and they are asked to see the PSHE or the Trans-Inplusion across the curriculum, they will find their schools to be evasive. And that should frighten each and every one of us because if you don't know what your children are being taught, how an earth can you say that you are a committed parent to the safety and well-being of your children, you just can't. But the area of greatest concern should be the now widespread practice of schools teaching children about LGBTQ plus and trans ideologies. First children of all are told that you don't have to be a boy, you don't have to be a girl, talk to us, guess your gender at birth. These ideas are not in schools to be discussed, they are imposed and any dissent is not tolerated. The only website is that there are more than one gender in this country. That is my opinion and that is an opinion which is acceptable in the school. My friend yours, which you are saying that there is no such thing as any other male or female. The mind of these are just two gender issues. Depending on what gender, you are choosing to make an issue of this because I said are you really going to do it? That was your opportunity to keep quiet. I believe we are teaching children to question fundamental truths like biological sex. And then what they do with that is they then have to fill in the gaps. So if they don't adhere to this stereotype of being a boy or being a girl, which is something that gender neutral parenting used to be, that your kid, your boy, or girl could have a push chair if they wanted. But what it now means is it means that biological sex is not particularly important. It's just your likes and dislikes and what you like to wear that is important. So that is being taught in schools. In fact, not just tall. That is through the ethos of a school. So that will be in the canteen. They don't call your kids boys and girls anymore. That will be the receptionist. That will be all the support staff. Every single person in that school will have been indoctrinated themselves into then a school. Into then indoctrinating your children. A common sense parent might ask, why are we teaching all of our children about such a tiny minority in society? After all, there isn't even any reliable data on how many trans people there are in Britain. It's really a two-pronged approach with critical race theory, which has been a big thing over here in the States. And really tears down kids. It teaches them that they are bad. Especially the white kids that you are bad, you're inherently white supremacist. And then the gender ideology is introduced as and kids are presented with a wide assortment of different oppressed identities that they can step into. So the worst thing in the world to be is a cis white boy. Even a cis white girl isn't looked highly on. But if you can step into a trans boy, if you're a girl and you can become a trans boy, all of a sudden you're celebrated. So it's almost like this conversion moment that teachers and school administrators are guiding kids through with the goal to help these kids become critically conscious, which is another word for woke. So it's really about dividing these kids from their parental influence, setting up this division between the parents and the children in order to make them little political activists for their progressive causes. Rather than liberating individuals, tragically, data shows that trans people are among the least satisfied of citizens in the Western world. Whilst there is a question mark over their methodology, small selective surveys of the LGBT community have claimed that 40% of trans youths have attempted suicide. Trans activists might argue that this is because of society's non-acceptance of transgender individuals. Critics might argue fears of suicide are revved up to terrify parents and teachers to further their agendas. Regardless, those with genuine gender dysphoria deserve our support and our love. But what if the lifestyle itself is the cause of this depression, which begs the question, why are we encouraging children to adopt the lifestyle of those with the lowest life satisfaction scores in all of society? The figures speak for themselves. There has been an explosion in trans identifying children in British schools in the last few years. There is a term for this, social contagion, and there are consequences. So if I had one example about a seven-year-old who has come up to school, he said to his mother, I can be a girl if I want, and nothing more was thought about it until two weeks later when they discovered the teacher is actually in that class, explaining her own child's transgender journey, the seven-year-old. Add to that, painful testimony from those who have chosen to reverse their sex change procedures demonstrates that bias regret is a very real and very dangerous phenomenon in the trans community. Yet from within the trans community, these accounts are dismissed or even met with rage. None of this stops Britain's most activist councils pushing forward forcing trans ideology in our children, even their parents yet to be consulted, and the government has repeatedly voiced its concerns. And I don't want to raise what I think is a very dangerous potential safeguarding issue that we're seeing in this area right now, where schools are inviting outside organisations, to provide counselling type services and using their materials, groups like Stonewall and Mermaid who are teaching what I think are dangerous and contested, extreme ideologies that don't have a base in science to our children and its country to DFE guidance. Later this year, Brighton Council is set to roll out its trans inclusion schools toolkit, which allows biological school boys into girls changing rooms, boys into girls toilets, and boys onto girls for residential trips. Activists are looking to brighten as a pilot curriculum with an eye to a nationwide rollout as their next goal, unless we parents take the stand. You might not want any of this. You might not even be aware that this is going on, but it is, and it is coming to a school near you. Parents have no idea what's being fed to their kids in school, and I think not only are they being fed lives, which is that boys can be girls and girls can be boys, and they're safeguarding being obliterated, so it means that any of their daughters can be in a changing room, and if that boy says he's a girl, he is then in that changing room, and schools are so gutless about it. That's dangerous in itself, the actual kind of things that will happen and are being taught, but broader than that, we have to think about what we're doing to children when we gas like them and groom them by lying to them, and allowing them or force feeding them the acceptance of lies is truth. And I think that does something fundamentally breaking to the soul and to the resilience and mental health of kids, and we talk about mental health all the time, but actually telling children to lie, how is that any better than the kids right the way across countries that we may scorn at China or North Korea when they're also being forced fed government propaganda. Some of its activism in that the teachers want to shovel their agenda or push their agenda, but some of it is just misguided attempts at doing good, and some of the teachers just literally don't know what they're teaching, and download the resources off the internet and go with it, because they feel like they have to address the subjects. So it's across the spectrum of different opinions there, but the issue is that when these teachers are pushing it, it's often not some people believe this or other people believe that, it's like this is the new truth, and they want to smash down normativity as they'll call it, whether that's heterotropic. heterosexuality or whether that's white normativity, it doesn't matter what it is. A lot of these ideas were introduced into education from a guy by the name of Paulo Freyari, who was, who wrote a, he's famous for writing a book called The Pedagogy of the Oppressed, and his whole philosophy was based on the idea that teaching and education is an inherently political app. So he saw great value in education for achieving political ends. The whole point of education was to awaken a critical consciousness in students, and so his philosophy is like one of the most cited in education schools, and it is gone throughout the US, and I'm sure around the world, with that, you know, explicit purpose. And so a lot of these educators are trying to, you kind of sever that bond between the parents and the student, and between the past and the student, so that they can inject their ideology and their worldview so that these kids will become little activists for their progressive causes. Critical theory, gender theory, critical race theory, queer theory, all of these really, really contested ideologies are being shoveled down kids tropes through PSHE, RSE, citizenship and the likes. Because make their mistake, business is booming for the LGBT and trans education sector. Brighton's toolkit was formed with the help of trans activist charity, the All sorts Youth Project, which last year had an income of £509,000, including a £287,400 grant of government money. That means you, the taxpayer, are funding a trans lobby group that wants to change your child's curriculum to include their political activism. All sorts host trans and gender exploring groups for children as young as five, parents being offered a separate space in the building. Their activism goes far beyond gender ideology, their terminology guys are littered with radical, critical race theory definitions of terms like whiteness, race and cultural appropriation. Last year, trans activist group Mermaids had a gross profit of 1.85 million. The Proud Trust, an educational resource that describes itself as the home of LGBT youth received 218,000 pounds from you, the taxpayer, last year alone. They flog information packs to schools at 75 pounds ago and they are eagerly hoovered up by activist teachers. Twinkle, a Sheffield-based publishing company, last year had a turnover of 42.6 million, offering hundreds of LGBTQ plus resources, including trans flag bunting for classrooms and pansexual pride posters. We are sleepwalking into a society where woke activists posing as teachers are grooming an entire generation into degeneracy, sexualization and depressing lifestyles. This is an attack on the family, young kids and are being encouraged to override their parents everywhere they can. They are being empowered beyond capacity, they are being given options, they don't understand, they are being targeted by these flashy fashionable trends that are going on. They are falling for that, we have got young girls, they want their breasts, they want their breasts removed, they want their breasts removed. We have got young boys who want their testicles removed, this isn't a horror story, this is a reality and this is where we're headed. People say they need to learn that there are gay people etc. etc. The learning life, as we always have them, is not a school place to say this is right, this is not right, that's a parents job. The parents rule is pass on values, school should be teaching the three hours, reading, writing or arithmetic, they should pass on knowledge, nothing more. The nuclear family has been seen as an obstacle to this kind of Marxist society that they want to envision. A lot of the sexual revolution has been about carrying down the nuclear family. They want us in a brave new world state where sexuality is just a transaction between meat machines. If they can cause kids to think differently, think that in that way about sexuality, they are less likely to form a nuclear family unit and then that vehicle for perpetuating the approach. The expression is kind of eroded in that way. So what can we do to protect our children and reclaim their learning, returning schools to places of education instead of indoctrination? Accessibility and accountability are key. In 1908, the Children's and Young Persons Act, known then as the Children's Charter, was brought about to protect the most vulnerable in society and enshrined in law a clear distinction between children and adults. I propose something similar to protect the children of today. The Reclaim Party's own Children's Charter. Number 1. School Governorships are to become elected positions whose meetings are held in public where any member of the school community can attend and speak. Number 2. The immediate removal of political activist groups targeting children such as Stonewall and Mermaids from all British schools and teacher training programs. Number 3. The withholding of taxpayer money from said groups and the defunding of councils who insist on imposing these divisive and contested ideologies. Number 4. An end to the teaching of critical race theory and critical gender theory as fact and a recognition that these new and controversial ideas should be discussed by but not imposed upon children. Number 5. Sex and Relationship Education to return to secondary, not primary school. Number 6. The publication of all teaching materials pertaining to PSHE in education, granting parents the option to opt out if they feel it may be age inappropriate for their children. Number 7. The banning of all political flags from school outside of the context of the classroom for the purpose of learning and discussion and yes that does include the pride flag. Finally, and I can't believe I actually have to say this, no more drag and adult performers in schools. These are places of learning, not nightclubs. Thank you.