COVID-19 Scam Dr. Peter McCullough - Controlled Opposition

Video Transcript:

This is the strategy. We know that this is bioterrorism. We know that this is phase two of bioterrorism, and we know we don't know who's behind it, but we know that they want a needle in every arm to inject messenger RNA or adenoviral DNA into every human being. They want every human being. Our goal is we can't stop from everybody, but our goal is to get a large group that they cannot get to. That they cannot vaccinate. And that would be COVID recovered, suspected COVID recovered, those with immunity, children, pregnant women, child-bearing women. We want a big block, and if we can get that big block and break them, if we can break the needle in every arm, then I think it'll be exposed on what is the plan. The question I have, and based upon what you've seen, do you believe that this vaccine was developed with an intent to harm people? Because it's hard to make sense of everything that they haven't stopped this. They've just been shoving it harder and harder and harder. I don't think it's by design. I just think that vaccinations are really bad idea. The inventors of these technologies did a very poor job conceptually of how to do this. We would never have a human cell produce an abnormal protein. Never. It's the worst idea ever. So do you think that there's any hope for some sort of neuro-mber type trial? Because to me, this is crimes against humanity. It'd be wonderful if we get to a justice phase right now, but there's been no admission of wrongdoing by any public health official or pharmaceutical manufacturer. So you have to go through the steps. So first would be admission of wrongdoing. So some type of repentance, then we need an acknowledgement or some type of understanding for this forgiveness. Then ultimately to amnesty. Recently, Emily Oster wrote in the Atlantic that we should just jump to amnesty. Well, the people in charge have not even acknowledged, for instance, they were wrong on masks or that the vaccines haven't worked. The people who have been damaged by the vaccines don't seem to care. So there's no outrage in general. And so I think we are far, far away from nerve-berg trials. We know that this is biocharism. We know that this is phase two of biocharism, and we know we don't know who's behind it, but we know that they want a needle in every arm. The question I have, and based upon what you've seen, do you believe that this vaccine was developed with an intent to harm people? Because it's hard to make sense of everything that's like they haven't stopped this. They've just been shoving it harder and harder and harder. Now, I don't think it's by design. I just think that vaccinations are really bad idea. And when I looked at the mRNA vaccine, I looked at the Pfizer one, the Moderna one, I was horrified. My contention is that there are multiple, deliberate toxicities built into these materials, and I can justify that. I ask your audience to think, how is it that their body plays nice with itself? Doesn't attack itself unless you're unfortunate and have an autoimmune disease, but normally your immune system, like they're like a military personnel, they stay in their barracks that don't harm you. But when you're infected or you get a cancer, maybe they go to war. And you know the distinction, how it is that your body does that trick. It distinguishes itself. All things inside your body that are meant to be there, it doesn't attack anything foreign, anything non-self. It will attack. So when you take mRNA and get one body to make a piece of a foreign organism, using gently, that's not my dog. When your body is instructed to make a piece of foreign non-human protein, every cell that expresses that is now blurring a signal I've been invaded. Your immune system goes to war and tries to kill it. Every single cell that this material goes into, these could never ever be safe for a mass market use. But if you just give it to mass populations, they will attack their own cells and kill them. That is the reason why you see dozens of different side effects, because it's one mechanism of toxicity, but expressed anywhere in the body, wherever it happens to land. There are many more concerns, but that's my first top one. And you said this was intentional? Yes. All four companies, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson, and Pfizer, all chose the same part of this so-called COVID-19 virus. They all chose the same part. They all chose the bit that sticks out the outside called spike protein. So a couple of things here, if I was leading a drug discovery team and I did dozens of times, the chances that my peers in the other company will come up with the same solution is remote to tell the truth. And you would never pick this. Why would you not pick this? We knew from previous work that the spike proteins that stick out from the outside of these microorganisms are biologically active. They can trigger blood coagulation and they are nearly toxic. They should have picked, if you believe the story about viruses, and I have significant concerns. But if we just go with an narrative, you would definitely, definitely not pick the parts of the virus that is biologically active. And the fact that all four drug companies did it, it's a black swan event. That's deliberate. Do you believe that this vaccine was developed with an intent to harm people? I don't think it's by design. I just think that vaccinations are really bad idea. And you said this was intentional? Yes. So you have to go through the steps. So first would be a mission of wrongdoing. So some type of repentance, then we need an acknowledgement or some type of understanding for this forgiveness. And then ultimately to amnesty, recently Emily Oster wrote in the Atlantic that we should just jump to amnesty. To amnesty, recently Emily Oster wrote in the Atlantic that we should just jump to amnesty. Emily Oster wrote in the Atlantic that we should just jump to amnesty. Emily Oster recently, Emily Oster recently, Emily Oster. Well, the people in charge have not even acknowledged, for instance, they were wrong on masks or that the vaccines haven't worked. And then the people who have been damaged by the vaccines don't seem to care. So there's no outrage in general. And so I think we are far, far away from Nuremberg trials. The very least, the things people have been injected with, the injuries to people from these so-called vaccines, I'm afraid. I wish I could tell you that it was accidental, but it wasn't accidental. I spent 32 years in rational drug design. I know and I knew and wrote it before any of them had emergence of use authorization that they were dangerous. And I'm afraid I'm convinced and would say with my hand on the Bible in front of a court, a judge that these these injections have been made to injure people to may and kill deliberately. When it's all told and it will be told, the truth is going to come out about this. I was telling you guys right before we started that I just interviewed a microbiologist who's studied immunology for 28 years. And he believes that these are crimes now against humanity that are coming out in the name of, you know, money and power. I will probably never get over. To me, this is unforgivable. And I think we are going to see the equivalent of the Nuremberg trials. When this is over, I think we're going to see, people, I hope we see people go to prison for the rest of their lives.