VAERS, Adverse Reactions from Vaccines, Fewer than 1% of adverse reactions are reported

Video Transcript:

The title of this report, Dr. Plock, and his electronic support for public health, vaccine adverse event reporting system, correct? Yes. Okay. And this was a study conducted by Harvard Medical School and the Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, correct? Yes. Okay. And it was done via a grant from an agency within HHS, correct? Yes. Okay. The purpose of this study was to attempt to automate bears reporting. Yes. Okay. The reason that Harvard did this study and the reason that HHS paid for it, if you look at page six, yes. Do you see where it says fewer than one, it's right in the middle paragraph, fewer than one percent, vaccine adverse events are reported? Well, yes, I see the statement. I don't see the reference. What? Well, let's take a look at results with that study then. If you go to the first sentence from the page that you're on right now, where it says results, is an entry that it says preliminary data were collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715, 715,000 patients. And 1.4 million doses of 45 different vaccines were given to 376,000, 432 individuals. So about 376,000 individuals received a vaccine, correct? Yes. Okay. Out of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions were identified, correct? Yes. So out of 376,000 people that received vaccines, they identified 35,570 possible reactions, right? Yes. Okay. Well, it's had a 1.4 million, which is 2.6%. Dosis, correct? Yes. Okay. Meaning, maybe some individuals had more than one vaccine and had reactions at different times, the different vaccines, right? Maybe some people were more susceptible to vaccine reaction. And so they got had a reaction every time they had a vaccine, right? Well, we don't know that. We don't know. I mean, assuming that each individual only had one vaccine reaction, then 10% of the individuals would have had a vaccine reaction. Yes. All right. So, now, at the beginning of this study, the CDC was cooperating with these grant participants, correct? Grant recipients, correct? Yes. Okay. And they helped define what is an adverse reaction, right? Yes. And they helped define the algorithms to use, right? Yes. And they also helped to define what reports should be excluded, correct? I guess so. But what events, I'm sorry, should be excluded from being considered, you know, reportable, right? Yes. Okay. After, however, they collected this data and they generated these 35,000 reports, they then wanted to submit those reports to theirs and automated so that those reports could continue to be submitted, correct? Yes. But the CDC would cooperate with them, correct? Well, I have no idea whether that's true or not. On page 5, Dr. Plocken, at the end of the second paragraph, it says, real, does it say, real data transmission of non-physician-approved reports to the CDC were unable to commence by the end of this project, as by the end of this project, the CDC had yet to respond to multiple requests to partner for this activity. Is that what it says? That's what it says. Okay. So, and this study says that less than 1% of adverse events are reported to theirs, right? Well, I have to check that, but I think that's correct. Okay. Are you aware that there are other governmental reports that make similar estimates for theirs? I'm aware that not everything is reported to theirs, yes. Are you aware that governmental reports show that governmental reports like this one show that the rate of reporting to theirs is extremely low, and in this instance, it's a Harvard said less than 1%. Yes, apparently, yes. However, it has to be reminded that reporting to theirs is supposed to occur whether or not you think there's been a reaction. So whether or not the reactions are true or not is not something that theirs decides. Right. First of all, first of all, the nearest out of one. But let's just assume, for a second here, so if let's go back to what's been marked as exhibit 46, okay? Let's assume that a full 1% of associated adverse events are reported. Wouldn't that take the number of deaths to 98,000? Then that was associated with the vaccine? I think it's likely that deaths are reported more often than trivial reactions. So I wouldn't be able to extrapolate from that number. But obviously, the death is more dramatic. Let me show you one. I think one final exhibit.