THE SEQUEL TO THE FALL OF THE CABAL - PART 5 The Cabals Evil Engine the UN

Video Transcript:

Let me take you on a field trip to Georgia, US. On a hill in Elbet County there is a granite monument called the Georgia Guidestones. Built in 1980 the monument is veiled in mystery. It was commissioned by a man who used the pseudonym RC Christian. He paid a hand some prize but insisted on remaining anonymous. The monument consists of four massive standing stones, one slab stone at the top, carried by a pillars stone, plus one explanatory stone. Two things are captivating. First of all the monuments is an astronomical clock and calendar. Focused on the sun, the moon, the equinoxes and the sources. A hole was drilled in one of the stones through which one can see the north star. Secondly, the stones contain text, information about the future earth and the era of reason. It is written in eight modern languages. The shorter message is described all around the top stone in four ancient languages, Babylonian, classical Greek, Sanskrit and ancient Egyptian. This is the message. Maintain humanity under 500 million in perpetual balance with nature. Guide reproduction wisely, improving fitness and diversity. Unite humanity with a living new language. Rule passion, faith, tradition and all things with tempered reason. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. Balance personal rights with social duties. Prize truth, beauty, love, seeking harmony with the infinite. Be not a cancer on the earth. Leave room for nature. Leave room for nature. In short, population control, the annihilation of a large part of the population, Pacific reproduction through eugenics, one language, one world court, social duties over personal rights, reason over passion, price truth, who's truth and nature over the human race, the cancer of the earth. And not to forget what they call the age of reason. Not the age of love or the age of compassion or the age of abundance for all. Hmm. Obviously this monument cannot be accused of being a hoax. After all, it simply stands there. So what are we looking at? Who on earth was the mysterious Mr. Christian who was willing to pay so much money for something so intricate and controversial? It seems to us that the Georgia Guidestones perfectly demonstrate the goal of the Kabul, the protocols of Zion, and the way they've been trying to hide their true intentions. I mean of the eagerly gullible term, sustainability. So what do we see in our world today? That is a reflection of these guidelines, these goals. Enter the United Nations, believed by the majority of the people to be a wonderful institution, the UN was founded right after World War II in October 1945. Officially, the UN was set up to maintain worldwide peace and security and to develop relations and cooperation among nations. Their blue helmets are associated by many with the protection of the people. They are called the peacekeepers. Well, that's one side of the coin. The other side shows quite a different picture. A picture in which the UN's goal is a new world order. A one world government as promoted by the learned elders of Zion. Is that a proven fact? Yes. In 2008, the UN actually set up their very own UN new world order project led by Nelson Mandela's grandson and ex-CIA Jaime Ilyin. According to highly influential people like the president's Bush senior and Bush junior and Gorbachev, the new world order must be founded on the principle of collective security. And that is precisely where the UN comes in. The UN blue helmets can lawfully intervene whenever the UN believes a country is a danger to collective security. They can lawfully send an army and attack that country like they did in the Korean War in 1950 and again in the Persian Gulf in 1990 or they can lawfully send military missions to a country like Inshaura Leung from 1999 till 2006. The UN army comprises of 70,000 soldiers from various countries. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? Well, let's put it this way. Assuming that the intent was good, the outcome was often bad, terrible as a matter of fact, even shockingly horrific. Now we understand that many people will have a very hard time realizing that organizations such as the UN and its WHO are not the benign entities they claim to be. We understand the level of cognitive dissonance of denial that we may trigger, but it is imperative to realize that both the UN and the WHO are cabal machines to the core. They hide behind a facade of beauty, but make no mistake. They hide their mask. These entities are monsters. So in order to deal with the myths of the peacekeepers, here are some facts that everybody needs to know. The UN has been involved with sexual exploitation and abuse for decades. There have been countless reports of sexual abuse, rape, women and child trafficking. When UN peacekeepers were stationed in Cambodia in 1993, the number of prostitutes rose from 6,000 to more than 25,000 in that year alone. The widespread use of prostitutes involved violent sexual abuse of girls. The UN response was threefold. The head of mission declared it wasn't important enough to follow up on, and that boys will be boys. Mission leadership advised peacekeepers not to wear uniforms when visiting prostitutes or park you in vehicles directly outside. And an additional 800,000 condoms were shipped to Cambodia to prevent the spread of HIV. Ah well, 1993, that's a long time ago. Okay, two years later, in 1995, in Bosnia and Herzegovina, evidence emerged that women and girls were being trafficked to work as sex slaves for UN personnel, and later that interveners were complicit in sex trafficking. However, it took six years before the UN came forward with its statement, and only because of rising public attention. The official investigation into this matter reported an obvious reluctance by the UN to recognize the involvement of peacekeepers in trafficking. The result? Did the UN prosecute any of the abusers or traffickers? No, it did not. It rewrote the definition of trafficking, making it less severe a crime under international law, and failed to provide adequate victim protection. Shortly thereafter, independent consultants raised the alarm that UN and NGO staff were abusing and exploiting local women and girls in refugee camps in Guinea, Liberia and Chera Leon. According to an oil investigation in 2001, sexual exploitation and abuse was most common. Examples? The sexual relationship between a UN civilian staff member and a 17-year-old refugee in exchange for school fees. The violent rape of girls by NGO staff, the rape of boys by blue helmets in Chera Leon, the exchange of sex for food provided by NGO staff, and the refusal of international staff to take responsibility for children, fathered with local women. From opportunistic sexual abuse, transactional sex, and networked sexual exploitation to bland sadistic attacks. 2015 Central African Republic. Two girls aged 14 and 18 were gang raped by armed minuscar peacekeepers near their base. The 18-year-old had asked for some food. The 14-year-old had simply walked by. Same year, same country, homeless and starving boys aged 8 to 15 were repeatedly raped by 26 UN peacekeepers. And UN peacekeepers randomly shot and killed a 16-year-old boy and his father and raped a 12-year-old girl. 2016 more than 108 additional cases were investigated, including the sexual abuse of 98 girls by international peacekeepers. The list of sexual exploitation and abuse is endless. The 14-year-old had just been arrested and arrested. The police were arrested and arrested. The police were arrested and arrested. The police were arrested and arrested. The police were arrested and arrested. The police were arrested and arrested. The police were arrested and arrested. The police were arrested and arrested. The police were arrested and arrested. The police were arrested and arrested. The police were arrested and arrested and arrested. In every single country, from Haiti to Somalia to Rwanda and Liberia, where 58,000 women and girls were raped in the first nine years of UN Mill. More of 75% by UN personnel. From East Timor to Sarajevo Bosnia, where Italian peacekeepers ran child prostitution rings from their barracks. The blue helmets left a trail of abuse and trauma. As one of the official reports are strikingly put it, many parts of the world, whether UN was present, were descending into chaos, if not help, and arguably with the assistance of the UN. There were plenty of investigations, but hardly any of the perpetrators who admitted to their crimes were prosecuted. Let that sink in. Even recently, the UN was once again connected with child trafficking and child abuse. When Canadian UN mogul Peter Dalglish was caught in the act, abusing two young boys in a pole. He was sentenced in nine years in prison. Up until his arrest in 2019, Dalglish had been presented as a saint, a protector of children. He was country representative for UN habitat in Afghanistan. He truly was into children. He even set up street kids international to help homeless children. What is saint? What a great loss to our children. Oh, and the UN have more on their slate. Remember the war in former Yugoslavia from 1992 till 1995? In July 1995, the UN failed to protect the so-called safe area in the enclave of subrenature. Instead of protecting the Bosnian people who have fled there, the UN dot-bad turned away. There was nothing they could do. They too had been betrayed at the highest level. 8372 Bosnian men and boys were separated from the families one night and were slaughtered by Syrian armed forces. More than 100,000 people were massacred in this useless war, mostly Bosnians. Between 30 and 50,000 Bosnian women, children and elderly were raped and deported. The official status of genocide wasn't acknowledged under international law until 2004. The UN was a very important part of the UN. Back to the official mission of the UN to turn this world into a better place. This is highlighted by the Club of Rome, a group of 100 powerful men and women set up in 1968 by among others David Rockefeller at his private estate near Rome. A private club presenting itself as a think tank, providing suggestions to the UN. It's goal to discuss its concern about the future of planet Earth, to come up with solutions and to urge governments worldwide to act upon those solutions. In 1972, the limits to growth was published. The Club of Rome's first paper on the problems of humanity, followed by the first global revolution in 1991, in which humanity was outed as the root problem of all the misery in the world. In need of a common enemy against whom we can unite, we have decided that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine, etc are perfect. These are threats we need to confront together, but we should not fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy is humanity itself. This, my friends, was the foundation of everything that was about to unfold. Humanity as the cause of all problems, the UN was delighted by the Club of Rome. It had founded the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1983, and the parallels with the conclusions of the first global revolution research paper were obvious. From now on, sustainability was the Kabul's magic word. And so, in 1992, the first United Nations conference on Environment and Development or Earth Summit was held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where the first agenda for Environment and Development, also known as a gender 21, was developed and adopted. 21 was a reference to the 21st century when all of the said goals would have to be met. 178 governments agreed with and signed the agreement. At the UN Sustainable Development Summit of 2015, a gender 2030 was presented, an extended version of a gender 21. 11 more goals were added to the original agenda, all aimed at the future of our planet and the human race, all aimed at sustainability. By now, 193 countries were participating. Do you know how many countries there are in the world? Only two more. 195. The only two that are called observer states are the Vatican and Palestine. A gender 2030 contains 91 paragraphs. Perigraf 59, outline 17 sustainable development goals. There are 169 targets and 232 indicators. This makes it a rather dry document to digest. But we read it. And we were impressed. Impressed by the level of cleverness and cunningness, with which something so evil was put together so seemingly benign. Using complex phrases in which words like peace, equality, safety and security are repeated frequently, the reader is actually left with a good positive feeling. We'll show you the 17 sustainable development goals in the following slide. Feel free to pause the video and have a proper look. We will however continue swiftly as we wish to point out where things go wrong, not where things appear to be right. Let's face it, these goals are not feasible. The club of Rome and the UN can use as many beautiful words as they can come up with, but how on earth are they going to accomplish these 17 goals? By asking you and me to pay more tax? Think about it. Number one, ends poverty in all these forms everywhere. Really? How? The word sustainable is used ten times. Why? To throw fairy dust into our eyes so that we don't see, so that we will willingly pay more tax and more tax and more so that the world will be safe from us, the cancer of the earth? There is nothing sound about these 17 goals. There is no logic. Take goal number seven. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. How? Are they finally giving the oppressed free zero-point energy of Nicola Tesla to the people? Really? The real reason why these goals were put together is to come to the conclusion that they can never be achieved as long as all the participating countries in the world and all their governments have to communicate with each other. That too much time, too much money is lost due to endless meetings. I'll bet you that the next step will be the announcement of the 17 sustainable development goals and only be reached with a one-world government. The countries will have to give up their sovereignty in order to save the world. Mark my words. The essence of the entire agenda 2030 is socialist communistic. It describes equal distribution of goods and money, which sounds great by which in fact means that the rich countries are to share their wealth with the poor countries. These poor countries are generally run by highly corrupted usurpers, dictators such as Cognata of Kenya and Obiang of Papua New Guinea or Xi Jinping of China. Are they going to share their wealth, their blood money with their people? That sounds like a wonderful idea to get rid of poverty once overall. Everybody would be rich in a split second. Let's take all the money from these corrupted governments, add to it the immense wealth of the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, both the British and the Dutch royal families and of course the Vatican. Let's redistribute that wealth among the world population. My what a marvelous idea to end poverty, ones and for all. Well no. The people will share with the people. So in my case the Dutch taxpayer will have to pay and share with the poor people of in this example New Guinea. Now don't get me wrong, I am full sharing absolutely but not according to the plans of the UN where corrupt malign governments remain unaffected. Read the paragraphs, the targets and indicators of agenda 2030, read them well and you will see that the people will bleed, not the governments. Whenever governments talk about equality you can rest assured that communism is involved and they don't even hide it. Top globalists such as former NATO chief Javier Solana, a socialist openly celebrate the plan as the next great leap forward. That's right, the old campaign slogan of the Chinese Communist Party. And isn't it odd that straight away just about every country in the world decided to participate and work together? Every dictator of every corrupt government who still at the blood on their hands of innocent civilian victims signed a agenda 21 and later a agenda 2030. Countries that have been at war with each other for years like for instance Ethiopia and Eritrea. Now all of a sudden shook hands, smiled in front of the camera and decided to forget about their wars on drugs, weapons and people trafficking, just to focus on the importance of a better world? On sustainability? Are you kidding me? What on earth were we looking at here? How much will the implementation of a agenda 2030 cost anyway? Well according to the UN and confirmed by the World Bank in a 2015 statement between $3.5 trillion per year. That is $12.5 per year. Where the hell is the UN going to get their money from? All those eros are going to be collected from the taxpayers, from you and me. That's what the solution of the UN is all about. The moment a baby is born, that baby has a carbon footprint and from the moment he or she was born that baby will have to pay. Isn't that brilliant? The shame and blame that is put on you and me, my goodness me. Agenda 21, 2030, the club of Rome, the UN, they all claim that we, the people, are to blame for the misery in the world, from poverty to inequality, from famine to the exhaustion of the planet's resources. Fine, let's talk about the planet's resources, shall we? Have I heard of Henry Kissinger? Oh, you will. Let's continue to part six.