JIM FETZER "The Raw Deal" (9-11-19) Special 9/11 PART 1...Four Planes

Video Transcript:

When you attend a funeral, it is sad to think that sooner or later those you love will do the same for you. And you make a budget tragic not to mention other adjectives to think of all the we think they will do, but don't you worry, no more ashes, no more sackful, and an arm band made a black cloth will someday never know a door in the sleep, or if the bomb that drops on you gets your friends and neighbors too. There'll be nobody left behind to degree and we will all go together when we go. What a comforting black that is to know. Universe, all the reasons and inspiring achievements, yes we all will go together when we go. We will all go together when we go. All subdued with an incandescent blow. No one will have the endurance to collect none is insured. Loads of London will be loaded when they go. We will all go together when we cry. We'll be French flying potato flying flying. There will be no more misery when the world is our road to the rest. We all will cry together when we cry. We will all be together when we go. There'll be nobody present at the wake. We work to stop the sun in that generation. We will all go together when we go. We will all go together when we go. And let there be no morning of the bars. We're just seeing a teedy on when you see that I see the M and the party. We'll be coming. I'll ask you off. On the occasion of the 18th observance of one of the great monstrous hoax perpetrated on the American people indeed on the entire world. I want to address certain aspects of 9-11 that have proven to be especially puzzling to every Americans and even in some cases to experts. I'm going to begin by talking about the planes that I'm going to turn to who is responsible and why. And then finally time permitting I will address how the World Trade Center was destroyed. The planes are especially fascinating. According to the official account we had two flights of 767s emanating from Logan Airport in Boston. One of which white 11 which is purported to have hit the North Tower. The other flights 175 the south. We also have a flight 93 originating from Newark International Airport which would according to the government come down in a crash in Schengsville. And fourth but not least we have flight 77 originating now the Dallas which is a lunch of the Pentagon. Now as I am going to explain all four of these claims for crashes to have occurred with these aircraft are provably false. None of those crashes occurred. Now what I'm addressing is sometimes referred to as no plain theory but it doesn't mean that there weren't any aircraft in the sky. It doesn't mean we'd have no videos of what are purported to be aircraft. It doesn't mean no one saw what they took to be an aircraft. No what I mean is very specific. Flight 11 did not hit the North Tower. Flight 175 did not hit the south. Flight 93 did not crash in Schengsville. Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon. Now I'd observe right off the bat that the same security firm was handling all three of the airports from which we fly to originated ICTS which happens to be an Israeli security firm. That will be an ongoing theme of our investigation namely that 9-11 was an Israeli operation with pollution from the CIA. Met elements of the Department of Defense and even the Vice President of the United States who appears to have been the executive director on 9-11. Now when it comes to flight 11, Gerard Holmgren was quite a brilliant blues musician from Australia observed that the Bureau of Transportation Statistics which kept kept copious detailed notes on every takeoff and every landing of every commercial flight in the United States. I mean they are detailed did not even show flight 11 scheduled to fly on 9-11 and of course there's a good reason for that. Flight 11 wasn't in the air on 9-11 similarly for flight 77 the Pentagon. This was really quite brilliant of Gerard Holmgren on I think therefore he has to be credited as being the inspiration behind no blame series properly understood. I shall also explain how pilots for 9-11 truth have made major contributions because pilots have been able to track the other two planes which actually were in the air flight 93 which is supposed to have crashed in Shanghai still discovering it was over champagne or ban it Illinois after it was alleged to have crashed. And flight 175 which they discovered was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania after it was alleged to have hit the South Tower. May I add that I obtain the Federal Aviation Administration records for the registration or strictly speaking deregustration formal taking out of service of the planes used for those two flights or bear in mind the same aircraft could be used for different flights on different occasions today from Tampa to Chicago tomorrow New York to San Francisco and it turns out that United 93 allegedly crashing in Pennsylvania 2001 on 9-11 was not formally taken out of service until 28 September 2005. And United 175 although officially having hit the South Tower on 9-11 likewise was not taken out of service until 28 September 2005 raising the obvious following questions. How can flights 11 and 77 that were not even in the air have crashed on 9-11 and how can flights such as 93 and 175 that crashed on 9-11 have skilled been in the air four years later. I'm going to demonstrate how we know that what I have just described is indeed the case. Here's an image of the alleged crash site in Shanghai still. It's only about 10 feet deep and 20 feet wide when we're talking about an airliner abowing the 757 with 125 foot wingspan the tail that stood 444 feet above the ground weighs over a 100 tons of airliner where is the plane remarkably enough though you can see no debris in Shanksville there's ample debris and other bonafide crash sites such as Yannandsterd am in Russia even in Missouri. I must say flight 9-11 in Shanksville actually 93 of course is a total phantom when it comes to crash scenarios indeed both of the reporters on the scene were interviewed at the time and both of them observed that the eerie aspect of the crash site was that there was no sign that any plane had crashed there that of course was because no plane had crashed there now some apologists for the government have insisted that this was an area in which mining had taken place that the ground was very soft according to one variation illustrated here the plane actually disappeared into an abandoned mine shaft well that's not only a fantastic on its face but we know what happens to miners trapped in mines they break out the heavy heavy equipment in the bright lights in dig 247 in the hope by some miracle someone might have survived they did not do that in Shanksville even to recover the reported 45 bodies that were aboard an airplane that could carry 289 another interesting aspect is it's very difficult to see how American are united whose planes were only about one quarter full could possibly be commercially viable flying cross country with planes that were essentially empty the whole scenario of the plane disappearing beneath the ground of course is completely and totally absurd meanwhile we had a photograph taken by a woman named McClatchy that's supposed to show a plume from the crash in the distance taken from her home the photograph however turns out to have been photo shot we notice for example that the bloom resembles that from demolitions not from plane crashes or plane crash bloom was sent to be dense black smoke this is more gray more over when you study the geography in the terrain it turns out that that smoke cloud was over upon and near a shanksville not at the alleged crash site here's another image of an actual plane crash massive amounts copious quantities of dark black smoke interestingly as reported united 93 still airborne after alleged crash according to ACT radar this is a report from pilots for 9-11 true they ascertain that the plane was still in the air and indeed as I've already observed was over champagne or ban it illinois after it had officially crashed in shanksville on 9-11 now here are four frames released from the Pentagon the Pentagon is just surrendered by cameras we'd all have a you know a massive amount of photography to show us exactly what happened but the Pentagon only released five frames four of which are shown here four of the frames show in a growing fireball for which there is even reason to doubt it actually occurred one is interestingly labeled plane and if you look just above the gate mechanism there there is indeed something that looks as though it might be a plane with a white bloom extending beyond it I also observed by the way that these frames from a video have the wrong date time stamp they do not correspond to 9-11 so I asked Jack why the colleague of mine from jfk research and expert with videos and films if he could create a photograph that included an image that included sizing of the Boeing 757 to the tail of the plane he did so and a real Boeing 757 would be it have been more than twice the sides therefore this was not a Boeing 757 quite brilliant research by Dennis Camino has in fact established I think beyond a reasonable doubt that it was a global hawk made principally out of fireberg last and that the white bloom extending from it is not the exhaust from the jet engine which pilots and aeronautical engineers have explained to me would have been black but rather from a missile being fired into the building which appears to be precisely what happened on 9-11 now here's a close up of the purported hit point there's a chain link fence a couple of automobiles two very large spools of cable the unbroken windows surrounding the hit point which is about 10 feet high and 16 to 17 feet wide again as in Changsville we do not have a massive pile of aluminum debris we do not have bodies we do not have seats we do not have luggage we do not have wings we do not have a tail this is out again a hundred tonne airliner there would have been massive debris but it's not there moreover although a section of the building would collapse that it would occur for about 45 minutes later I believe indeed that was brought about by a secondary explosion because the initial damage didn't appear to be convincing enough that anyone would be persuaded that a plane had actually hit there indeed when they did an excavation on the part that had collapsed there were no signs of an intense fire such as shown in the fireballs in four of the five rains that the Pentagon would release for example on the fourth floor you see a wooden stand that appears to be from an unabridged aux ridiculous in their it shows no signs of burning in fact nowhere in terms of this internal environment that is now exposed you see signs of their having been an intense fire according to the official account the Boeing 757 flight 77 which we know was actually not even in the air was barely skimming the ground at over 400 miles an hour and hit the Pentagon on the ground floor well if that had happened auto a torn up the the Pentagon law with a massive engines the thrust and the exhaust but when we look we find there is no damage to the law and at all nor is there any debris this is one of the most important photographs from 9-11 we have two line green civilian fire trucks extinguishing the very modest fires that remain after the purported crash but the Pentagon law is perfectly clear on laminated and free from any debris there are many other photographs of this kind here's the BBC which at one point came and interviewed me for eight hours for their conspiracy files first program on 9-11 they would return years later to interview me again for their second in both of these images you can see very clearly there is no debris from an aircraft on the ground one taken before the other after the section of the wall had collapsed so what was happened here we have debris that began showing up later my speculation has been that it was dropped from a C-130 that was circling the building because it would have been too awkward to have officers and been carried debris out onto the lawn by far the most significant piece of debris is that shown in the foreground here which does indeed come from a the fuselage of a 757 but notice it appears to be peeled off it's not crunched up as you would expect from a violent collision it also shows no signs of being exposed to an intense fire all the paint perfectly clear nothing blackened even more strikingly they're entwined in this piece of debris is a piece of vine not indigenous to the Arlington Virginia area it's quite striking that it should be present which led to Jim Hanson who's a retired attorney from Columbus Ohio to undertake a study of where it could have come from it turns out that 757s are extremely safe there have been very few crashes of 757 which made it much easier for him to track it down to the crash of American Airlines 965 near Cali Columbia in 1995 the pilots lost track of their approach and passed through a jungle where these vines are indigenous before collide with a side of a mountain here's some photographs of the debris interestingly it was an Israeli company that undertook this salvage and appears to have been responsible for recovering the piece of debris from a Boeing 757 that would appear on the Pentagon lawn here's the pilot from the plane circling the 130 of the 130 that was circling who said when he was asked by the BVC what he thought of my suggestion that he had dropped the debris that was absurd notice he didn't say what I said was false or over here's the official trajectory of the it's approaching straight at the Pentagon as I mentioned before barely skimming the ground and taking out a series of one two three four five six one I post in the process now it's a matter of the relativity of motion that the effect of a plane traveling over 400 miles an hour and hitting stationary land posts would be the same as if the plane had been stationary and were hit by land posts traveling over 400 miles an hour they would have ripped open the wings the fuel will store there would have mixed with the air would have caught fire and exploded the plane would have caught wheeled across the lawn it would be quiet amassed with loads of debris but there is none there interestingly it turns out that approach is not even there of dynamically possible because aeronautical engineers have explained to me that that plane at that speed could not have got closer to the ground than 60 or even 80 feet with his higher than the Pentagon at 71 feet is tall because of a phenomenon known as down graph or sometimes known as ground effect it was an aerodynamically impossible trajectory made up by the fantasists who designed this whole scenario who wanted to create a plausible story and I have an excellent idea as to who the author was but was not familiar with a science or the laws of physics or a verodynomics now the citizen investigative team discovered that there were a group of witnesses at the sito station who had actually witnessed a plane approach the Pentagon only the plane that approached the Pentagon north of the sito station whereas the official trajectory was south norm and maneta who is in an underground bunker with dip chainy on the occasion of 9-11 witnessed and reported to the 9-11 commission with they chose not to include that and aid to the vice president came up to him repeatedly saying sir at 50 miles out sir at 40 miles out sir at 30 miles out to the orders you'll stand at which point chainy went around and said of course have you heard anything to the contrary what Norman maneta did not appreciate at the time was that the aid was questioning what an order to not shoot down a plane that was approaching the Pentagon ought to be continued to be followed obviously since planes had reportedly been used as instruments to strike buildings in New York this plane would be an obvious candidate for striking the Pentagon to shoot it down would have been the right thing to do you lose a passing gears in the plane but you do not lose the personnel and property at the target this plane was flown north of the Pentagon approach the and then swerve over it in fact Roy Schaeffer who's another colleague of mine from JFK research had a trucker buddy by the name of Dave Ball who was in front of the Pentagon at the time by sheer coincidence Dave Ball explained to Roy how he'd witnessed the plane approach and then swerve over the Pentagon many of the witnesses by the way at the sito station saw the plane approach and then an enormous explosion and took for granted the plane and hit the building but in fact it had not as we already know there was no evidence of a plane having hit the building from all of the evidence that was taken at the time indeed in the the Pentagon has five rings e-ring d-ring than b-and-a innermost in the searing there was a hole that was quite symmetrical and spray painted on the wall it said punch out this was purported to be evidence in a landing gear from flight 77 had hit the searing and created this hole however the symmetry of the hole suggests it was done with explosives and indeed had it been hidden in angle which would necessarily have been the case given the approach of the plane at an angle to the building it would have been an asymmetrical jagged hole not the perfectly symmetrical which is the effect you'd expect from military explosives not the only that were employed at the Pentagon here's Jamie McIntyre who was CNN's best reporter at the time he was asked by an anchor about the plane having hit the Pentagon and he replied well you might think that from my close-up inspection there's no indication of a large plane having hit anywhere near the Pentagon there only small pieces you could see you could pick up in your hand he was later a treasure to retract that claim that report he'd made what he did in the following right he said on the air only a fool would deny that a plane had hit the Pentagon meaning he had been a fool to report a fax in the false belief that he was expected as a journalist to report the truth rather than a fantasy scenario made up by the government he apparently found it too heavy a burden to bear all of this propaganda and baloney and retired from the news service meanwhile April Gallup who is a civilian employee came to work bringing her infants on that day and reported when she turned on her computer there was a massive explosion in the front of the Pentagon which appears to have been timed to coincide with the approach of the plane that swirled over it she walked outside through the hole found no evidence of any plane having hit the building though she did report a heavy smell of explosives because that's exactly what happened explosive had been set off it had not been from the impact of any plane meanwhile a major general Albert Stumblebine was interviewed in Germany and elsewhere this happens to be from the German interview about whether a plane had hit the Pentagon uh general Stumblebine's user especially notable because he was previously in charge of all US military signals including photographic intelligent he was the top dog in the US military for photographic intelligence and he explained to the reporter in Germany just as he would subsequently on various interviews in the United States including one he did with me that no plane had hit the Pentagon because it wears no impact to the wings on the very soft limestone facade of the Pentagon not only did a general uh Stumblebine make that assertion then but when I interviewed him and reviewed with him the very evidence I'm presenting with you here today he agreed with my analysis about all four of the crash sites and added additional reasons I was right of his own it was very peculiar to me when later in the morning there were reports that a plane was targeting the capital which caused members of the house and center to rush out onto the steps of the capital through across the Potomac and see billowing black clouds I knew that was a fantasy because the wine greens of billion fire trucks it is already extinguished the very modest fires so I undertook research to discover what in fact it happened the fire turned out to be coming from a series of enormous dumpsters in front of the Pentagon not even from the building itself you can see them here this is a classic Hollywood special effect a member of scholars for 9-11 truth and organization I founded in December 2015 would visit me in Duluth subsequently and show me 44 more frames from a national geographic special on 9-11 where you could see light in between the dumpsters which were billowing smoke in the Pentagon itself this is embarrassingly bad if we turn to New York it's remarkable that the now-day brothers of French film crew just happened to me in a position which a Scottish student estimated required satisfying over 100 improbable conditions to have a camera swing up and capture the hit of what was supposed to be flight 11 hitting the north tower very peculiar indeed because by the time they heard the noise from the plane which would have been far to their right in relation to what we're seeing here they would have looked to the right but the plane would have gone far beyond instead the camera man just had the presence of mind a swing up and capture the hit it turns out not day brothers as an anagram of the Wayne street on which the filming was taken it's that blatant now here's the image of a 767 against the background of the north tower which of course is identifiable because of its large antenna here is a time sequence created by Rosalie Grable of whatever was approaching the north tower she's suggested it looked like a series of flying pigs that was quite a brilliant tennis suit observation here is the first hit frame you see a bright light from what's supposed to be the impact of the plane with the building now here is a contrast between the initial impact which created kind of a z formation when you put together the points of impact and what would later turn out to be an extended v in other words they weren't even consistent in the manner in which they think this not only that but other students I believe this was in fact jack white once again notice they'd actually extended the impact on the building for the right wing they made an extension into the steel the very idea of course of an aluminum aircraft passing through this massive building which was surrounded by 230 massive steel support columns was a fantasy in and of itself but that's what they had to depict in order to promote their scenario it indeed it appears those cutouts which have been likened the cookie cutter cutouts Judy Wood has talked about road water cartoons where you see the road runner passing through a boulder and leaving his exact cutout or the same for wily coyote appeared to have been created against a background during which the massive fireball which appears to have been created by previously positioned the explosive was concealing what was taking off place in the background now this particular plane flight 11 was intersecting with seven different floors of the north tower each of those floors consistent of a steel truss connected at one end to the core columns at the other to the external steel support columns filled with four to eight inches of concrete the variance is because the trusses had four inch deep v-shaped grooves and therefore the variance differed but because the buildings were 208 feet on a side that meant each of those trusses represented an acre of concrete each floor an acre of concrete on a steel truss so that this plane was intersecting with seven we know the kind of damage that occurs when an aircraft implied impacts with a small bird well what do you imagine would happen if it impacted with say one of those massive steel segments from the external steel walls of the building it would have been devastating meanwhile there were Israeli art students they so described themselves who are known as a gelatin groups that were occupying high floors that twin towers and performing what they claim was performance art external to the building here you see a box of them which filled with fears and special kinds of uses it's my believe that the role of the gelatin group was to prep the building to create those cut out cookie cutter cutouts beneath the facade of the preposition explosives that would all disappear within 15 to 20 seconds leaving as it's remnant the cutouts Steve Dachme I say with whom I have engaged in debates offers the alternative theory that the cutouts were created by firing missiles at the building it's very interesting stuff you can track it down online our debate would be found at 153news.net now a great deal of activity was going on in New York City on 9-11 a lot of it including involving Israelis the dancer art student groups had a variety of 9-11 tests among them planting jammers on buildings to block port authority dispatchers and first responder radios planting explosives on the New Jersey side of the George Washington bridge where the cables are anchored in order to collapse the bridge exploding a truck in the Lincoln tunnel exploding a truck in the hall and tunnel parking trucks with demolition devices and specific parking areas of the twin towers coordinate with Mohammed autumn at aata and his group except they were the patsys they were the 19 Islamic terrorists who were supposed to be responsible for bringing these atrocities about which however had completely different origins it's interesting that the five of these Israelis were observed in liberties a state part across the Hudson River from the World Trade Center filming the destruction of the twin towers celebrating taking selfies an observant citizen a resident nearby observed and reported to the police they apprehended them in an urban moving systems van that had a painting a mural on the side of a plane and against the background of the twin towers urban moving systems which immediately vacated the premises turned out to be a most sought asset the driver when arrested by the police said we are not the problem your problem is our problem the problem is the Palestinians one of the most absurd statements made in relation to 9-11 the police found residue of explosives box cutters passports enlarge some some money in the van they were arrested and held for 44 days until they were released by an assistant to the Attorney General John Ashcroff they returned to Israel in three of them are shown here appearing on Israeli television explaining that their role in New York City had been to document the destruction of the twin towers which obviously required prior knowledge the assistant who released them was Michael Chertoff a dual US Israeli citizen who would unbelievably become the second head of the department of homeland security after the 9-11 Patriot Act was passed in completely reorganized government taking some 36 agencies which had functioned very successfully in competition with one another to fair out intelligence a very desirable plan from an intellectual point of view into one humongous agency that could filter and suppress alternative reports to guarantee that there'd only be one report of what was taking place at that at any particular time in a van meanwhile virtually everyone is familiar with footage of white 175 this is a Hezarkani footage from the side where you see the plane approaching the south tower pilots for 9-11 true studied the videos and determined that the speed at which the plane was traveling which was 510 knots and 430 knots for united and American respectively that is 510 for 175 430 for America actually both exceeded the limits of the technical capabilities of the aircraft at that altitude and speed which means the planes would have physically come apart in the air had they been real indeed pilots for 9-11 truth created a documentary you can find online 9-11 intercepted in which they give you a diagrammatic depiction of what would have happened which I'm showing here meanwhile the what's supposed to be a real aircraft just effortlessly disappeared into the south tower with no collision effect if sometimes we refer to as a ghost plane or as a butter plane because it disappeared into the building as though we're 110 story high cube of butter completely absurd you know we see a diagrammatic representation showing that that plane like 175 was intersecting with eight different floors of the south tower where once again that man it would be impacting with eight acres of concrete on steel trusses just absurd to suggest a plane could disappear into the building with no collision effects jack white took the heaven terabeng's video which was filmed looking up toward this the roof of the south tower and selected these frames to depict flight 175 not only passing through its own length in air but passing into the building its own length in the same number of which of course is completely preposterous unless I'm passing 500,000 tons steel in concrete building provides no more resistance to the trajectory of an aircraft in flight than air completely absurd remember distance equals rate times time so if you have the distance the length passing through its whole length in air and passing through its whole length into the building in the same number of frames the rate being the same that means that the time being the same that meant the rate was the same there was no deceleration which is as conclusive proof you could possibly have that this is a fantasy scenario anytime you're witnessing violations of the laws of physics or of aerodynamics or of physiology or what have you you know what you're seeing is not actually possible what ought to have happened instead has been well depicted by Ace Baker in his 9-11 psi opera where he shows a plane crumbling external to the building with bodies seats loggies wings tail falling to the ground the engines which were quite massive put no doubt have entered the building will return to that meanwhile of course we had the massive spectacular fireballs which disappeared in 15 or 20 seconds when we study the façade of the buildings the ground beneath the roadway and the walkway however we find no signs of any aircraft debris beneath either the north tower nor the south and that's of course perfectly appropriate because no real planes actually hit either of those buildings they even went to the trouble to plant an engine at church in Murray but they committed a mistake once again they didn't know enough to get it right it was an antiquated aircraft engine no longer in service by Boeing in the flight 175 Jack White again very astutely discovered Fox News footage where we find a four or five persons wearing FBI of ass unloading something heavy he asked pick up or delivery they were delivering this prop to the stage which was in fact on the sidewalk which significantly is completely undamaged at anything that massive hidden high velocity as would of necessity been the case had it actually come from the impact of a 767 with a south tower it would have done immense damage it was gouged up the sidewalk but they didn't want to pay to repave the sidewalk so they just set it down it was underneath a steel scaffolding and even a canopy which were likewise undamaged we they even left behind a dolly that appears to have been used in making the delivery not only then to have pilots confirmed that flight 93 was over champagne or banna but they also studied flight 175 was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh Pennsylvania now mind you this is coming from pilots for 9-11-2 this is a highly responsible very professional organization of retired airline commercial and military pilots they have made major contributions the 9-11 research related to the aircraft so what happened well there are three different theories about how these crashes were fake one is that it was done using CGI or computer generated images that theory was first introduced by Rosalie Grable the very same who created the time sequence of light 11 hitting the north tower as a sequence of flying pigs she was also known as the web a very good person I liked her a lot a second has been influenced by East Baker video compositing according to East they added the images of the planes between the time the footage was taken and it was broadcast there's a 17-second delay during which that could have taken place the third which was a develop by a fellow in the UK is that the planes were actually holograms now the reason why the hologram theory appears to be more viable than the other two is in the first instance the following we had lots of reports of witnesses claiming to have seen the plane approach the building in real time but had it been either CGI or video compositing that would have been impossible because you would have only seen the planes then in the broadcast footage not as it was ostensibly approaching the building now they varied greatly in their reports some said it was a large plane some said small some said it was commercial some said it was military but we had hundreds of witnesses well what is there to support this Richard D. Hall of the UK presents his flight 9-11 flight 175 radar data 3D analysis what Richard did was to study the some 42 videos we have a flight 175 approaching the building he discovered 27 were sufficiently precise that you could actually capture frames showing the location of the plane at a specific time and he created a sequence of the plane approaching the building he's he looked to see whether NIS he had any such similar reconstruction and discovered rather to a surprise that they did which they claim was based upon radar data Richard did not believe their radar data was authentic but he undertook research of his own and discovered there actually was military radar data from plane approaching the twin towers interestingly however the military radar showed the plane 1200 feet to the right of the image to have 100 feet to the right of what everyone had reported as being the plane approaching the tower this appears to be because the plane was actually captured on the radar was projecting an image 1200 feet to its left this accounts for the impossible speed that the plane was showing the image projected faster than was our dynamically possible for a 767 in order to preserve the integrity of the holographic image in flight and which also accounts for the impossible absence of any collision entering the building this appears to be how it was done here's an image where you can actually see one plane projecting the image of another indeed I was sent a page from an Australian military manual for an airborne holographic projector brief description the holographic projector displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location removed from the display generator the projector can be used for psychological operations and strategic perception management it's also useful for optical deception and cloaking providing a momentary distraction with engaging an unsophisticated adversary well there's no more unsophisticated audience than the American people who are completely gullible and believe anything they see on television which I believe has vastly corrupted the ability of the public to differentiate the reality from fantasy there are those who have suggested that the holographic projection theory is impossible because it requires a physical object to be projected onto which has led some to speculate that there was a missile that was cloaked in a hologram that resembled an aircraft however within the last couple of years although it wasn't known at the time it has been acknowledged that the military has developed a holographic projection onto air where the molecules air molecules in sound serve as a temporary screen that appears to be how it was done in this case many who are familiar with the facts of technology recognize the American military has very significant technology 10 to 20 years in advance of what it allows to be known to the American people that appears to be exactly how it was done no then if no planes crashed the no passengers died and no as