TRUTH vs NEW$,INC (3-14-18) JIM FETZER "GREAT ANGEL" 2 OF 2

Video Transcript:

an hour of Swiss versus news, especially filming on the 14th for the I'd some marks and we've got a heck of a show here with Jim Fetzer's back and we have activist angels especially here. So now let's see Jim. Why don't we just get you up here and get you going on what's happening here? Well thanks Don. We begin with the House of Republican, slide number one, breaking with the intelligence community on Russia, where the House and Intel Republicans, no evidence of collusion between Trump campaign in Russia, damn's not consulted on findings where there's no evidence because there was no collusion. If you go to the next slide too, you find Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee reached an opposite conclusion Monday from the intelligence community they oversee announcing that Russian President Vladimir Putin was not trying to help Donald Trump win the 2016 election. The Republicans also said they found no evidence that Trump campaign colluded with Russia and they're shutting down their year-long investigation. Their viewpoint, which aligns perfectly with Trump's view, will be met with disc agreement by Democrats and bound to inflame partisan tensions. But the fact of the matter is Don, as we know from slide number three, the family of Seth Rich has confirmed that he was the source of the DNC email leaks that there was no that there was no Russian hacking and he paid for it with his life. And if you go to story number four, slide number four, you find as I reported many times the book a shattered explained how the whole Russian hacking meme was made up by Robbie Mokin, John Podesta within 24 hours of Hillary's campaign concession speech in order to obfuscate the inadequate campaign they had run that the revelations of WikiLeaks led right to beatsegate where John Podesta's pedophile and chief and Hillary's own entanglements with the Russia where she sold 20% of US uranium reserves to Russia for $145 million donation to the Clinton Foundation. And if you look on slide number five we get a nice summary overview of the Mueller's Russian follies, the musical romp and search at collusion now playing held over a wild and crazy rich rod where Trump is explaining to the ticket teller Hillary Clinton's $10 million of production. It's a flop. It's a big flop. It's a complete disaster for the Democrats. Angel. Well, I haven't got a chance to see your slides. I don't know where you're going, but how wonderful of you to mention Seth Rich. I'm thrilled to hear about that. I'm really curious Jim how much you know or what you think about the fight between the good guys and the bad guys. And I would point to Sean Hannity. I remember listening to him every night when he said I'm not going to drop this such a Seth Rich thing. Don't you worry I promise I'm going to carry on. And then the next week it was crickets. You know what's what it are these intelligence leaders on the Republican side perhaps not in the blackmail compromised pedophile Satan ring and and and the good guys are able to start stepping forward. And if so, what happened to Sean Hannity? Well Devon Nunes has proven to be a very fine man of great integrity, but he's been assailed by many of the CIA's stoogees such as Adam Schiff. Yeah. Who might have no doubt what so ever is an agency man. Oh yeah. Others in the Democratic party. So I'm glad to say it looks as though things may if we believe QAnon actually be shaping up where Guantanamo appears to have been refurbished even with you know padded cells for some of the players. So we'll see I think in short order how this plays out. Yeah. It looks pretty pretty short order to me. Go ahead. If you turned us slide seven, Don, we find that just like Las Vegas authorities are hiding the surveillance footage of Parkland. I have no doubt it's because it would show it was simply a drill. As in the case of Las Vegas that no one was killed that they're all faking it. Here's a perfect example in slide number eight. We have this young man who's supposed to have been shot in the leg, but Don, if you go to slide number nine, when he rotates toward his parents, his leg does not move. When you do a close-up, it has no toenails. It's a prosthesis, Don. It's a prosthesis. This is one more piece of fakery. And look at slide number 10. You may be astonished to discover that not only is David Hogg's father FBI, but his area of specialization is crisis management. So I'm inclined to believe now that the reason they brought David Hogg out from California to make him part of the Parkland community is because his father was going to run the off. He wanted someone reliable to be a spokesman, a fake student spokesman. If you go to slide 13, we have a new report, a revelation about it by Dan Krohmur, Parkland shooting hogwash, connect the hogs. It turns out this Emma Gonzalez shown here with David Hogg is actually his cousin. That this thing is a family op and it's fairly stunning. Plus if Dan is correct, when you go to slide number 12, you discover it turns out that the mug shot for Nicholas Cruz, when you check the metadata, was actually created on February 14th, 2000, released on February 14th, 2018. But the metadata shows it was created two years earlier on April 19th, 2016. And then I just before it's released. And equally stunning. If you go to slide 13, like the Sandy Hook fictional shooter, Adam Lonza, the photos of Nicholas demonstrate many inconsistencies. In this case, for example, his first court of appearance was taken over one year before on January 10th, 2017, before it's released on February 15th, 2018. All of which shows this Parkland event. This hoax was long in the works, long in the planning. He was arranged in the 17th, 2017. Wow. Wow. Well, I've been dying to talk with you about this one, Jim, because it's fascinating. You were one of the first ones to talk about false leads and peeling of onions. And I'm wondering, I've been, I've watched all of the crisis actors in this situation. And there's one teacher who talks about seeing the shooter in police gear. And she is very believable to me. And I don't think she'd be a part of the sia. And so I think that they had crews was somebody who had said enough things that they could pin it on him as a patsy. They tried to use the God technology and his brain to have the demons tell him to go shoot people. And it didn't work. So they brought in a few real shooters and then arrested the poor kid and McDonald's later, which is verified by that one student who said she was talking to him while she could hear shots being fired. But that one teacher that said she saw the shooter in police gear before she went away. And she actually showed a graze on her arm that was the realest wound I've ever seen looking. So I'm wondering whether we might have a combo thing here where they're laying down false flags. And there really were some shooters and some wounded, but they're not going to show us those people because they might not stick to the script. Well, if you miss you miss a show last week where I talked about the teacher. Yes, she she claimed to have seen this fellow in garb. And if you accept her testimony, there would have been at least two shooters if you accept the cruise was a shooter. But it turns out her testimony, which I initially found very plausible as have you, turns out to be inconsistent with the experience of a 25 year old police officer, 15 year general detective who pointed out all the inconsistencies, the casual way she reported that she wasn't reliving any of the emotions of the moment. It turns out that she is a teacher who's another crisis actor, Kevin. And she claimed to have seen a fellow teacher be shot. This is a male guy, but he left the school in 2012 and appears to live in New York. Yeah, I know, I know. They have doctors. They have doctors who are lying to Angel. They're talking about a girl student who has supposed to have been shot in the stomach and the chest. And like 14 days later, they say she has all healed at these young people heal quickly. I mean, it's just a far from a medical point of view. It's a complete far. Geez. Okay. Thanks. Thanks for your research. I'll tell you. I mentioned now tomorrow Thursday. I'm doing two hours on Parkland with Kerry Cassidy. This is from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. Eastern. That would be from 2 to 4 p.m. Pacific. I believe there's still 2 hours separated. It's going to be very thorough in detail. Then I'll go through with the shooters with the testimony. I'll show you at least three crisis actors among the students. And we have a doctor who is lying. The teacher we're talking about and much, much more. How can I and your listeners now find that project? Camelot. Project Camelot. Kerry Cassidy. Two hours tomorrow. It will anticipate me by far the most thorough and meticulous dissection of Parkland. I have 150 slides. I can find projectcamelot.com. Right. That will be playing on Thursday. I'd to march the 15th. That'll be after this show is already before this show is already playing on Thursday. Hopefully it will be archived in a little bit. We'll be able to watch that. That's going to be a good. No doubt. No doubt. Fantastic. Brother. If you got a slide 15, it may be because I've been emphasizing that Las Vegas was a movie. They've tried to do a meta and claim. Yeah. It's a movie script, meaning what the police are saying because it was actually more complicated according to them. More shooters tied in with ISIS. In other words, they're bringing us a bunch of nonsense. The point I made and Dan Kramer, who identified the metadata on those photographs was the first to point out to me that the recording of the shooting was too high quality to have been taken at the time. It was being played over the PA system with coordinated special visual effects, lights flashing in the Mandalay Bay to simulate a machine gun, three light bursts higher up where they had the crowd seated with as many as 500 crisis actors. It's really a stunning. So I mean, we have pointed out how the three closest hospitals received no gunshot victims that one of the respondents explained. She thought that this was a Facebook friend was calling about the drill that no one was shot. I should contact the local police. I have a massive evidence about it. And I'll tell you where you can find more about Las Vegas as well. But what they're doing here is to try to preempt the idea of it having been a movie is claiming yes, what you're told is false, but it's because it's more complicated. Yes, the very slide you've gotten on 16 with FBI brass was provided with forensic evidence of multiple gunmen. They told agents to stand down and focus on panic only. But the fact is they had simulated. There's evidence of at least three other simulated shooters. And what many don't appreciate is that the lobbies of the Blasio, the flamingo in New York, New York were also shot out at the time, which is why the Las Vegas sheriff initially was very candid and said obviously more than one shooter was involved. But he was shot down by the FBI. And now he's monitored whenever he speaks. Look how they're trying to spin it here. This is really embarrassingly bad. When FBI brass were provided with the names of persons of interest who likely assisted panic. They were instructed not to interview them. The FBI uncovered specific evidence showing panic was anti-trop and it had an affiliation with Antifa. I mean, this is absurd. Patic was a multi-millionaire. Now he may have been a gun dealer because he appears that his showroom had had 40 guns. And it happens that we're you know, as display and then you figure out which you like. And once you got that decided you would go for a shooting practice elsewhere. Being a whole way. The purchase. But you even get this. You'll find this fascinating angel. The body that we see in the suite has curled earlobes whereas panic had straight ones. In other words, the body isn't even paddock. I have a police officer who has formerly in black ops. Tell me it showed signs of having been in the deep freeze and it was defrosting while it was sitting there in the suite. The body that was subjected to autopsy is only 73 inches long. That six foot one. But we have paddocks fishing and honey license from Alaska. He was six foot four. This idea of tying it into Antifa. And if you go further, you see it even says what FBI brass was giving that you know, they're trying to bring an ISIS. I mean, this is stupid beyond belief, but they're stuck with it. You want further confirmation? Look at this slide 17. I have a wonderful colleague by the name of Mona Alexis Presley has been investigating the autopsy, the obituary's cabin. The obituary's were based on people who died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death. Now the corner, the Clark County corner shut his office because he was being besieged with death for requests for death certificate and autopsy reports and he didn't have any. So he just shut the office, but freedom of information requests have led a judge to declare that he has to produce them. So now he's produced 58 autopsy reports. They have names redacted, no ballistics, paddocks autopsy report is being kept secret. Go to slide number 18. The fact is that he's also supposed to be shooting victim. So it would be important to have the ballistics, but get this and this is even more devastating. If you go to the next slide number 18, this is a critique by Dan Krohmur who's proven to be quite brilliant. There are 58 autopsy reports that raise more questions in the answer. They don't include ballistics, photographs, diagrams, x-rays, histology or toxicology. They're missing 32. Don't have the time of death 14. Don't have the time of the obce three. Don't have the time of death 40. Don't include a clear chain of custody. Get this most importantly, it turns out they were composed by pathologists all over the country. In other words, what he did was satisfy the judges directive was to put together 58 autopsy reports from six at least six different sources, taking out the names, the file numbers and not including the relevant information to even show they were shooting victims. It's a complete charade and fraud light in our faces, Kevin. Really acting. Yeah, wow. You know, before we started, I use the analogy that we've had YouTube and Google sitting outside our shores with these giant ships and huge guns pointed at us and just waiting for them to do exactly what they're doing right now. And that is bombarding us and destroying alternative information because they had a monopoly on it. And we see with Chance George and with you and you started it. Your banning of your book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, was really the beginning of their efforts. And now they're going back to anything that has to do with a false flag of hoax shooting, whether it's a combination or not. And any YouTube video that mentions Sandy Hook that mentions Parkland, that mentions this David Hogg 20-year-old, you know, fake crisis actor character is being completely wiped out. And we are, we, the information apocalyptic says, as Coursey calls it. And I just, I hope that Lionel is right of Lionel Nation, that they're shooting themselves on the foot. They're killing themselves by being so blatant about what they're doing. And in the end, we're going to work our way around them and the truth is going to reach out to enough people that we can hunt with monkey this and get rid of that deep state, which is shipping not just cocaine and guns like paddock, but children. And the end, that's right. And because of good chances, right? Because you have veterans today tv.com creating a new massive website with, for videos, for blogs, for interviews, you have, Mike Adams of natural news who was wiped out over 1,700 videos taken out. He's working on a new independent standalone source. Real. Video, it's called Real. Video. It's worth one, one, five, three news.net right now is a good place to locate your videos quite a few of mine are there since Gary King YouTube channel, which had previously archived many of my shows was also wiped out. But I think it's so blatant. It is so overwhelming. It's so massive. I think Lionel may have it right. They actually have shot themselves in both feet and even the head. Because no one has any more confidence in YouTube or Google. Facebook and Twitter don't seem to be quite as bad. But Facebook has adopted a new programs we're about to discuss. In fact, that are cutting down on political discussion to keep adjust between friends and family to remove, you know, the topics that mean the most to the public who have been resorting to Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg who got, you know, he's in the pocket of the agencies as well. I have no doubt is, you know, playing the game that the CIA wants the social media to adhere to. Do you think the CIA is going to keep as much power as they've always had? Or are finally are people going to see that, you know, they're running opium and cocaine and children and guns and they're just literally become at least part of them, the compartmentalized most evil force on the planet. Baby steps, Kevin, baby steps. We got to see, you know, what we can do incrementally. You're talking about it, giant leap forward in the public consciousness. It's only going to happen incrementally. But I do believe that this was actually a mistake. They've unleashed the mindless AI algorithms, you know, and programs to take out anything that's based on syntax. It's really, if you're talking about Sandy Hook or Boston bombing or I think they had a trifecta against them between Sandy Hook, Las Vegas and now Parkland, Kevin, because these really were so badly done that once you begin looking at the evidence, you're simply overwhelmed with the fakery that was involved. It's almost so much that I almost doubt the fact that they thought they would get away with it. They're so blatantly ridiculous. Almost throughout so many different bizarre clues like that one teacher that sounded real to you and me about throwing out a very strange story that conflicted with the original story. It's almost almost as if there's some strange psychology going on where they are destroying themselves on purpose. I don't think I don't think that's quite it. I think it's that the objective of disinformation is not to persuade you one way or the other, but to create enough uncertainty. Everything is believable and nothing is knowable. They just want and they want to create a greater sense of dependence on the state to protect us when the state is perpetrating these false flag attacks in order to make us feel more dependent on the state and more amenable to the political agenda of giving up our guns, for example. I mean, this is a major terrorist. I'm going to throw that at you. It's not the state. Still, there's still some good actors that I voted for, Nunes and still some good people will tucker and Hannity out there. So the state, it's not the state, it's people claiming to be the state. It's usurper's pirates or worse than pirates. It's the deep state in its multiple manifestations. Thank you. If we go to slide 21, we find that our Facebook, I mean, a slide 21. Yeah. Facebook was losing 50 million user hours every day and then decided to crack down on conservative content, but that may be an exaggerated number to try to justify their returning to what they claim was the original purpose of slide 22 reflex. So he wants, you know, Zuckerberg is promoting the idea of returning to friends and family and just conversations about the latest birthday or anniversary, which is, of course, the meaningless to most. I mean, it has its place, but there's much more going on here. Look at slide 23, Mark Zuckerberg warned in January that radical changes he's making to return Facebook to its roots connecting friends and family would could tell how much time people spend there. He wasn't kidding. Those changes that got underway last quarter already hitting engagement numbers, reducing the time spent on Facebook by 5% as a giant social network shows people fewer viral videos, fewer controversy, opposed and exchanges. It's all his censorship and paternalism is though Facebook knew what's best for the American people as though Google was an arbiter of the true and the false as though the government could tell us what is real and what is not. Here's a further troubling development in slide number 24. The European Union wants internet firms to delete terrorist content within one hour. In other words, they're so concerned and the problem, of course, becomes what qualifies as terrorist content, which could be used to remove anything, critical of the government whatsoever as in the name of social security, but they're proposing that the first hour of its appearance online should as a general rule be removed within one hour of its flagging by enforcement authorities in Europe. Let me just say my fortuitous coincidence slide 25. A brilliant book is coming out this week from www.moodmurupbooks.com. The New Gutenberg press by Preston James. This guy's a social psychology. He's one of the best of the best. He's been talking to me for years about this and I encouraged him to put it together in a book and now we have it. The New Gutenberg press on how the deep state is threatened by the internet today by the alternative media. That sounds really interesting. Our show about the about the problem was taken off the internet within an hour of it on February 21st. They took it right off. So and I'm still in the YouTube channel. I've often heard the comment that if we have the internet Hitler never could have succeeded. And I've been watching some of the footage of George E. Porgy Bush in the beginning and reading the pet goat and all that kind of stuff. If we'd have the internet we have today, I don't think that 911 could have succeeded and it really looks as if we may be beating that fascism. As Milo Yiannopoulos, I went to my son's club rush in college and talked with a bunch of great kids and college about what mattered to them and many of them had seen Milo Yiannopoulos. And of course his focus is that the most dangerous thing happening today is the assault on the First Amendment using offensiveness or hate speech or anything like that. We really are a bastion with that beautiful, gorgeous First Amendment that doesn't exist in Canada where chance is and doesn't exist in Europe where a lot of people are put in jail just for their beliefs. And you're really talking about the role of political correctness on rampant where you know even to criticize the government or Barack Obama was supposed to be unacceptable socially because he was black as though anyone gave him. I mean it was his governance and many decisions he made which includes participating in the effort to keep Trump out of office to sabotage. You can campaign. Barack Obama was part and parcel as much as Hillary Clinton, as much as Valerie Jarrett, as much as Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC. Now look it's like 27. We have what I regard as an emerging threat, the use of mental health criteria as a basis for gun confiscation. Just a month and two days after Sandy Hook on 16 January 2013. Barack Obama signed 23 executive orders to constrain our access to weapons under the second amendment. But he also initiated mental health programs at a level where they have never heard to for been imagined to be appropriate. Now we have I think one of the signs of what is to come. Here they're talking about confiscating gun from a nonviolent man on the basis of mental health criteria. And this is a true slippery slope case where they're going to begin gradually with cases that seem well sort of acceptable and then they're going to move to cases that are not. Here we go in slide 28 where Dave Hodges, the common sent show has been pointing out that we're having gun confiscation beta tests all over the country. And he's got a report here from an insider who is trained and who's describing here how they are practicing taking block by block confiscating weapons that they put armored personnel carriers at each end of the block. They go house by house with a large, you know, a dozen men or more. They knock on the door. If they have legally registered firearms, they simply take the weapons away. If they're not legally owned, they incarcerate the whole family. I mean, it's very disturbing. It also suggests very strongly. And you could go to slide 29 now, Don, the Jade Helm 15 about which I was writing when I got the boot from veterans today. Gordon Dough being the editor then was designed to practice these techniques as well as snatch and grab in American communities. And that it's now coming to fruition. This fellow is very, very troubled indeed. And just behind my image, Don, you have concealed a FEMA camp because it looks as though they're going to want to use those for dissidents. If you go to slide number 30, it's very, very interesting that there's a false belief that's motivating these gun control efforts. It turns out you think there was a direct correlation. The more guns, the more homicides, but in fact, the situation is the opposite. The higher rates of gun ownership are correlated with lower incident of homicides. It's precisely inverse. So look at the map at the top. You see, the greatest gun ownership is in North America, the United States and Canada. But look below, they have among the lowest homicide rates in the world. Latin America, South America have low gun ownership, very high homicide rates. Africa, low gun ownership, very high homicide rates. So the situation is really completely different. Lots of studies have shown when you take away guns that crime goes up, especially violent crime, what could be a more obvious example than Chicago, where we have the most stringent gun control laws in the nation and yet violent crime has gone rampant out of sight. There are areas where the police won't even enter in Chicago. So remember, you call the police if you feel threatened because the police have weapons they can come to assist you. But the time delay may be too great. Often as much as 20 minutes in the meanwhile, the may have tends to take place in the first five or six or your daughter may have been raped. Your wife murdered. You have been bugged while you were unable to defend yourself awaiting the police. Remember, the NRA got it right. They said when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns because they are criminals because they don't obey the law taking guns away from law abiding citizens as a colossal mistake. If you go to slide 31, you see Dave Hodges also describing what a fierce to him to be the three stage coup designed to impose a stallionization upon the United States. The first stage being the attack on the first amendment, stifle all conservative speech, really all critical speech, all rational discussion of policies and practices by the government, which they're doing through the university's YouTube, Google, Twitter and Facebook. Second of all, the attack on the second amendment, you have to take the guns. False flags are being employed a full court press to get legislation against the second amendment. Why? Because an unarmed populist cannot defend itself from desks, but if they don't have access to guns. The University of Hawaii's demo site project demonstrated that in the 20th century alone, there were 19 genocide each preceded by gun confiscation. Third in stage three, you have to get the dissidents, the troublemakers, the outspoken critics out of the public domain, remove them for the good of society where they're setting a bad example and incarcerate them in the new American gulags we call FEMA camps and get this. This slide 32 reports. We're having all these student protests all over the country, but you think they're spontaneous? Wrong. The protest in Florida, for example, was organized by Demi Wasserman Schultz and fanatic democratic organizations like moveon.org. They were targeting in the timing coincided with the legislature in Florida considering broadening concealed carry and curaging or allowing the teachers to do it. This is happening here. It's happening all over the country. The Democrats were in terrible shape politically because of all of the revelations about corruption between the FBI related to the steel dossier, the russian gate, which had no basis. They wanted to change the narrative. Parkland, Trent, their agenda to a T and they're exploiting it to the max. Angel. Wow. I love that homicide gun thing. There are several things. First with the mental health thing, the mental health using that as an excuse for confiscating guns. Mike Adams had a great article that ADHD was a manufactured disease created for the big pharmaceutical age disease and says we have two million plus rising children on ADHD drugs right now. I'm sure that when they grow older, they will be designated as having had mental health problems and be disallowed from owning firearms. I just wanted to say it really, it looks as if we might have been reaching the point where their plans are not succeeding. Yes, they planned Jade Helm to be bigger than it was. You stopped it and then Gordon Duff said, oh gee, it wasn't as bad as Jim Fetcher said it will be. Well, no, it wasn't as bad because people like you spoke up. So they have these ideas that they're going to put people in camps and they're going to start World War 3 with rogue CIA missiles that come out of Hawaii. But agencies and even higher powers, I think, are stepping in to aid and help us succeed. The last one is, you know, stifle conservative speech was Dave Hodges thing. I'd really love it if we all took a step back and stopped using the words conservative or liberal Republican or Democrat because it's corruption versus anti-corruption. There's lots of corruption in the Democratic, not every place on every comment section of all the good conservative websites that are exposing corruption. I see people going liberalism is a mental disease. We should shoot all liberals liberalism or that. I don't know what I am. You know, how do you, you know, most of the people I know have these kind of ideas or the smart people are now a combination. A smart people are now a combination of liberal on, you know, social issues and conservative on this, but conservative doesn't mean what it used to mean anymore. You know, George Bush used to be the evil being that we ought to watch out for. And now it's flipping Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. So I'm done with this dichotomy of this divide and conquer business. I think you're completely right. And I think Trump is actually transforming it. It's really a populism versus establishment much more. It's even a patriotic Americans versus anti-democrats. I mean, Antifa, for example, which is sponsored by George Soros, although it claims to be anti-fascism is a fascist organization. They use all the techniques of fascism, threats, violence, intimidation, shouting down speakers, a picatin events to deny a freedom of speech. I mean, it's a disgrace for anyone to ally themselves with Antifa and claim to be supportive of the Constitution. I am, I suppose, a constitutional liberal. I believe in the social security Medicare Medicaid unemployment and workman's compensation. I believe the United States should be a moral leader in the world, not invading countries will in the early and most certainly not sacrificing its young men and women for the benefit of Israel by taking on these modern Arab states that here and before have served as a counterbalanced Israel's domination of the entire region, where they want us now to confront Iran. I'm very troubled that Trump replacing Tillerson with Pompeo may be planning to do just that. The world will be against him and Russia is going to be under landing. Mark Mywerge, Vladimir Putin is the one true statement that stride the world stage today. Donald Trump, Theresa May, French President, they are a second rate and far behind Putin. Two quick things if I could. One, I think they're in our face with this anti-fah because what it really means is anti-first amendment. They were very clear in their little secret, you know, machinations, anti-FA. And oh, that's good. Yeah. And the, what was the second one? Oh, I forgot the second. You go on. Maybe Putin, Tillerson, Propel, War in the Middle East, confronting Iran, any of the above. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You go on. We're doing great. Popularism, you know, America first. I do think Trump has transformed the landscape. He may yet prove if the Q&N on prognostications are well conceived and based. And Trump may do great things for the United States. Thank you. And as a fascinating subject and we'll really see, I'm feeling more hopeful than I ever have, especially when you speak to young people because they are, they're CNN. It's still even the only people I know that know anything about CNN are watching the criticisms of CNN. CNN doesn't really have any viewers. They just act as if they do. You know, and I love Donald Trump and his is calling them out for what they are because the media and end is the most serious enemy this constitution has ever faced. The people who own that media are evil in the extreme beyond anyone's wildest imagination, except for perhaps yours, Wachimagopians, Lionels and mine. Well, Kevin, you're absolutely right. I mean, the television has become the greatest instrument of propaganda the world has ever seen. This goes back to Operation Mongoose where the CIA began infield trading the media in the 1950s by 1975, William Colby, and his head testified to Congress and the agency owned everyone of any significance in the media. The situation has only become worse, but they've been threatened by the development of the alternative media through the internet, which is why we have this mighty contest taking place now. Why we're having this internet warfare. Alex got it right when he talked about info wars. Corsese got it right about this information apocalypse taking place now because they're fine to stifle the truth. They had no idea there was so much out there and so many Americans are have turned into citizen investigating journalists, Kevin. It's been one of the great phenomena of our time. Billy, Billy, it's thrilling. I get goosebumps when I think of the fact that I've been involved with the two of you for four or five years now, and we've been right at the forefront of this right on the front lines and we're winning. I mean the battle of the Bulls, we're bulging out. I think. And I know Don has some words he wants to add Don. Don. He's quiet. We can't hear. He's muted. Oh, there we go. So I want to say that right now, I'm considered about Trump bringing in Pompeo and the CIA and having Brennan being in charge of communications, XCIA people are coming in and the CIA has created all the mess that we've had in the last 60 years. Yeah. I think you're right. This is a big picture. Major topic at our next broadcast. Yeah. Okay. Go ahead. It's not just crazy like a fox. I'm man. He's done so much great stuff. His first executive order was about the human trafficking and he's been rolling up those child traffickers like 10,000 times was ever done before him. So I'm kind of on issue guys. You guys know. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. But we turned to slide 34. We find just as NFL viewership is dropped dramatically in the wake of the politicalization, the kneeling and all that. We find the Oscars have taken a heavy hit as well. The ratings for the 90th Oscars on ABC suggest viewership for the annual award show is dropped to its lowest level ever. According to preliminary data from Nielsen, the nearly four hour long broadcast hosted by Jimmy Kimmel only average in the 18.9 share down 16% from last year's 22.4. If you got a 35, you'll find just as you were suggesting Kevin CNN is running way behind in the top 25 shows CNN has only number 24. MSN NBC does somewhat better, but Fox is really taking the lead here and I think appropriately so were Hannity and Tucker who are two journalists of integrity. I've been so impressed. Wow. A great job of getting at the issues where Tucker cuts right through it. He has a naive a tear about conspiracies, but I can forgive him that as long as he does it put up with bullshit. He cuts right through. And here if you go to slide 36, they call it the Pelosi of peacemaker. That since being attacked at 24.7 by leftist liars, NR membership interest has simply skyrocketed. And in fact, if you go to 37, you see the NR he has gained 500,000 members in a month in the wake of Parkland. Kevin is fascinating developments. Americans pride themselves on their guns. I'm simply troubled that the deep state has been preparing systematically through Jade Helm and other actions. How to disarm the public piece by piece block by block home by home. You know, in the third on your list there was still Rachel Maddo and that made the top three. What I consider the three most intelligent people on the internet, but I used to be a huge Maddo fan. I would listen to her radio show all the time. I helped write, you know, NBC and tell them to give her a TV show. Her and Stephen Colbert. I don't know what to do in my heart about losing those two people. Yeah. To madness. They must either be in on the pedophile Satanist blackmail rings or so flipping unwilling to look at the truth in their ignorance or their blackmailed. I just I can't figure that one out. Kevin, I think that's very astute when he was doing the Colbert rap horror, it was completely brilliant. Really? The John Stuart on followed by the Colbert report, though, was the most brilliant hours of television in our history. Ever. Two was an early fan of Rachel Maddo and I was simply dumbfounded to see her deterioration. What we have now is CNN, which is CIA 247 and it's best NBC, which is CIA light with a feminist twist. But I have no doubt that Chris Matthews that Lawrence O'Donnell, Rachel Maddo, these are all creatures of the intelligence agencies of the United States mark my words. How did they get there? The were they from the beginning or has something happened? You know, it doesn't make something about that doesn't make any sense to me. I've never been able to. We used to have Keith Overman who I thought had the most brilliant hour on with countdown. That was just sensational. Sensational. How pressure was applied to take Keith out. I think because he was cutting through the smoke and mirrors and getting down to brass tax to effectively and replace him with the Beguilin Rachel, who's, you know, one more advocate for a whole host of views that make her initially intriguing. But I'm sorry to say she sold the nation down the sewer and I can't explain it. It's very troubling to me too, Kevin. Just grateful. Okay. Good. If we turn to slide 39, we find BB saying Trump still intends to scrap the Iran nuclear deal. And I'm very sorry to say that it looks as though one reason for bringing Pompeo in and booting Tillerson out is that Tillerson was in favor of the nuclear retaining the nuclear deal, which always was well founded. In fact, Iran ceased its attempts to develop nuclear weapons in 2003 with Saddam Hussein was taken out. They were only doing it as a defensive measure because they were hearing from the United States from the Vice President from the National Security Advisor from the Vice President spokesman Scooter Limby that Saddam was developing nuclear weapons and we didn't want the next attack to be a mushroom cloud in the words of Condoleezza Royce. So it was rational for Rand to be pursuing nukes at that point in time, but once he was taken out, they ceased their development. Our own big three Intel agencies all agreed by 2007. Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons, which they reaffirmed in 2011. Even the Mossad came aboard in 2012 and concurred that Iran was no longer seeking to develop nuclear weapons. Rand deal was a good deal. And if Trump, Jettison's Iran deal, why would any other country, such as North Korea, have any trust whatsoever in his word? If he's willing to rip up an agreement of such magnitude that had international sponsors, he's turned the United States into a discredited entity where treaties mean nothing to the United States, even though under our own constitution, they have the same legal standing as the constitution itself. So I'm very troubled by this. Go back to 30, yeah, 39. Iran says it'll give up its missiles when the US gives up its nukes. I think that's an admirable statement completely right. Slide number 40, the Syrian Army is deploying new Russian-made radar. Believe me, the Russians are digging in. And Putin has announced that any attack on Syria, especially Russian forces, will be met with a military response. And you had best take him at his word. Slide 41, that's the bee we talking about, the Iran deal. And I hope Pompeo coming in doesn't mean he's going to give it the boot, but Trump has long said that he gets along famously with Pompeo. Never had any warmth for Tillerson. And the point you're making is very astute, Kevin. Namely, this is given the CIA more influence by promoting the former head of the agency to become the Secretary of State. Here we have in Slide 42. Israel is trying to suck America into a war with Iran. This is coming from Lawrence Wilkerson who is a chief of staff for Colin Powell, our former Secretary of State, and an honorable man, although he was played by Bush and Cheney to talk about, you know, a rack having been developing biological or chemical weapons, which was complete in utter nonsense. Wilkerson, as you can see in Slide 43, is given an explanation of what's going on here and why it's so extremely hazardous. And then as you see in Slide 44, Trump unceremoniously gave Tillerson the boot. He didn't even have the courtesy to contact him personally before it happened. He sent out a tweet. This is very crude. This is brutal. There appears to be a sadistic side to Trump that I do not admire at all, Kevin. It troubles me deeply. Well, to start with that one, you'll notice he did the same thing that Tillerson they did with Komi. He waited until he was out of the way and couldn't walk back into his office and gather up hard drives or gather up evidence or all that kind of stuff. He blindsided him. And with the amount of swamp creatures that he is trying to deal with, trying to keep his enemies close, his friends close, whatever that business is. I mean, it's not like he has a whole bunch of white hastitudes from. And I like the fact that he fires people and keeps working toward he wants. I don't like the fact that Tillerson contradicted him on speaking with Kim Jong Un, which I think is one of the most brilliant maneuvers I've ever heard of in my life to suddenly say, oh, okay, I'm, you know, the Democrats or whoever they are, whatever that side really is, kept saying he's a war monger. He wants war. Obviously, he says, okay, us in. I'll talk to the little rocket man. And, and, and then their heads explode, you know, as far as Netanyahu is concerned, I think it's really important for us to continue this distinction between the government, the people who claim to be Israel and the Israeli people themselves considering the recent fact that Netanyahu used drones to tear gas his own people who were protesting his policies. So we've got the decent people of Israel, the decent people of America versus the corrupt, satanic, horrific, blackmailed, and bribed, you know, regimes that want war because war creates refugee children that can disappear. And, and, I think it's, yeah, I hope to God, it's really true that we have some sort of higher power, including, you know, non-terrestrial entities that are helping us out because what we've got is a corruption so deep that it's most people can't even think about it. And, and for that reason, it appears that Trump modified either the UCMJ or the NDA to facilitate the trial of civilians under milk by military courts martial specific circumstances when they are threats to the national security. I'm given the corruption of the FBI and the Department of Justice. I think this may be a necessary move, although I don't endorse it in principle. And, what do you need to remark, Kevin, take the guns and worry about due process later. That was an abomination. He's where no to uphold the Constitution, which stands for no citizen of the United States may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process. This was one of the most calamitous remarks that Donald Trump has ever made. And I was embarrassed and ashamed that he had said that. I believe he's now come to his senses. He's counseled from leaders of the NRA, but it was appalling that he would suggest that we could vishyate gun control, which of course made, you know, a dianne finestein aesthetic on the occasion. It was shocking to see the video of that conversation, which was, of course, televised now with a congressional leaders where Trump went off the rails. Well, if you read his book, you look at his negotiating style, he's known and he says, you start way off in one end. And what he did was he exposed Pelosi and them for exactly what they are. You know what I mean? At rabidly, oh my god, you're going to please my masters that have made me a multi-multimultimultimillionaire by doing their bidding and taking away the guns. He's hooray, hooray, hooray, and then he backs off of it. So I don't know, I still think he's a good guy who's so brilliant that he is able to negotiate that minefield of swampiness. He didn't blow up North Korea on his own and steady-safety to the man. So he starts with these extreme positions and then works his way back towards some center. And I'm willing for some compromise. If it means saving the children. Kevin, let me review the last set here where opportunities I have had to get the word out about Parkland and other issues. Slide 46. On the 5th of March Monday, I was on the power hour no longer hoisted by Joyce Riley alas and has been moved back to two hours in the afternoon instead of three hours in the morning by GCN. When I was on with Joyce Riley, we would rank nationally number three among all radio shows in the country after Glenn back in Laura Ingram only. But in this case, it was very good. Daniel does a good job of hosting and they would link to, for example, expert questions for the shooting. This is a seven and a half hour minute critique by a guy with both military and police and school background who's explaining why the whole thing looks completely wrong. They link to fake news on five fronts where I give a capsule summary about the latest on Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing Charlottesville, Las Vegas in Florida where I'm going to give a much more extensive explanation of what's happened at Parkland and why it matters. If you go to slide 47, you see government slaves picked up on fake news on five fronts. You can also find the video available there. Also at 153news.net and it will be at this veterans today tv.com. But I take your word seriously, Kevin, about the name of the organization may require revision. Here in slide 48, I did a 30 minute interview with Robert David Steele. Yeah. His views on hashtag Google Gestapo and the post-signness internet. TNI, as you'll see in the next slide, did an interview with Kerry Cassidy. She had a roundtable on censorship. But Robert told me that in the two days it had been up. It had had nearly a half a million hits, nearly 500,000 hits. Wow. See, look at the next, the panel discussion about the censorship by the social media. This was a good discussion with myself and a number of others, including initially Robert David Steele. Dean Ryan, Angie and Jim Blake and a fellow Keith Anthony Taylor from the UK, which you can find out there and covered some important issues. And then slide number 50. VT is creating this completely independent entity free from any social censorship. But I do think they have to cope with the name, Kevin. Frankly, I'm going to suggest that they find another way an alternative to make it more appealing on its face because veterans today itself earns such a bad name, especially after Gordon Sackney. He would delete all 150 of the articles I'd publish with him. In fact, it took such a heavy hit on the readership, the editorial board to restore them. While they were back up, I moved them as many as I could onto my blog. And frankly, it's because I have 900 blogs I want to protect from savaging by the social media that I'm moving them into veterans today TV. But I welcome any comments you may have, Kevin, here for the duration of the show. We have a few extra minutes. And I want to give you the opportunity to contribute further of your thoughts about all these issues we're addressing here today. Well, you know how I feel about veterans today. And it reminds me of comments sections. He didn't just delete your videos, but he they would regularly, if the comments sections didn't work for them, especially they had two different one Facebook and another one. If the other one they could moderate any comment off they wanted the Facebook comments they couldn't they had to remove the entire thing. So the minute you would say something truthful in the comments sections of veterans today, that would be moderated off. I don't know why everyone has discus as their you know, arbiter of whether or not you can comment on their side or not. I don't get it. But when I use a privacy browser called Epic, instead of regular browsers, many comment sections are simply close to me. I can't even look at them. And I think I've learned more from comment sections many times than any other places.