The Real Deal: Sandy Hook and The Boston Bombing with Jim Fetzer

Video Transcript:

This is Jim Fatser, your host on the real deal. In Dallas, Texas, three shots were fired at President Kennedy's motorcade. It looks like one of those scenes of an old building being purposefully dynamited and blown. When we are successful. I'm getting shot of it. And we will be. You ready to make to come to the microphone? So we'll listen to it. A new world order. This one is Robbie Parker. It might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11th. President Kennedy died at 1 p.m. Live from the media broadcasting center. This is Jim Fatser, your host on the real deal. Where today I have a special double feature, an update about Sandy Hook during the first hour, and an update on the Boston bombing during the second. Here you see I am beginning a presentation at the Northfield Library in Northfield, Minnesota, where my speaking there have been contested. It has become a matter of public discussion and debate after a bar owner, Norman Butler, had invited me to give four presentations, one a month, February, March, April, and May on JFK 9-11, and then I was asked to give a speech to the public. I was asked to give a speech to the public. I was asked to give a speech to the public. I was asked to give a speech to the public. I was asked to give a speech to the public. I was asked to give a speech to the public. I was asked to give a speech to the public. I was asked to give a speech to the public. I was asked to give a speech to the public. The other day, the east, the east, the west, the east, the east, the east, the east, the east, the east, the west, the east, and the east, the east. So I gave a speech to the public. For me to a presentation, and as you will see in the next slide on the 18th of February, 2015. Sponsored by the Muslim-Jewish Christian Alliance for 9-11 Truth, I gave a presentation under the head in three speech and terrorism, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing. that the governor of Connecticut, Dan Malloy, gave on the day of the shooting, 14 December 2012, where he explained that he and his lieutenant governor, who was standing beside him, had been spoken to that something like this might happen. I began to contemplate what he could have meant spoken to by who, something like this there only seemed to be two alternatives. One, that he'd been a prize that there might be a shooting in a Connecticut public school in a lot of children massacred, in which case the governor ought to have taken steps to ensure that did not happen, especially by alerting the school districts, which he did not do, or alternatively, that he'd been advised that they were going to take an abandoned school, conducted drill, and then presented as a live event in order to support the administration's gun control agenda, which is exactly what played out. Indeed, as the next slide shows, when I looked into who could have been there, it turns out that none other than U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and the governor were scheduled to discuss the plans at a news conference in New Haven on the November 27, which of course was just a couple of weeks before the events at Sandy Hook. The Reuters report says the administration is taking a cautious step toward confrying the politically tricky subject of gun violence with an issue that they've focused on prevention. It will not be the gun control launch that some of President Obama supporters hope for. Instead, the Department of Justice and Connecticut State officials will announce what one law enforcement off-facial called a statewide approach targeting repeat criminals, creating alternatives for gang members and rallies, neighborhoods against violence. Known as Project Long Jeviti, it will send new federal grant money to Connecticut and involve agents, academics, and social workers working with the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Farms, and Explosives. Well, it turns out that Eric Holder has a long history where the next slide shows him speaking to a national Democratic women's club in Washington, DC, in 1995. Eric Holder was already obsessed with gun control and was explaining to the women, and you can find this online, that it's necessary to change the public's attitude toward gun control and even to brainwash them. That was the word he used on that occasion. And that appears to be exactly what was going on with Sandy Hook. If you turn to the next, you'll see Sandy Hook was rated as a 10 out of 10 great school. Now this was a public kindergarten through fourth grade school with 626 students. To have a 10 on a 10 scale, that means it had to be a macular inside and out. What I'm now going to demonstrate is a massive evidence showing that the school had in fact been abandoned and was not in use. Apparently not since 2008. Now here's something that Sandy Hook did not have. Look at the parking lot, look at the area. No oil stains. There that with the North and Mary parking lot, such as we see in the next slide, and you realize the enormous contrast to have no oil stains implied that the parking lot was not in use and had not been in use for some time, with the weather and the heavy winters, and absorb the oil that otherwise might be expected to be present. That's not all that was missing from Sandy Hook as the next slide shows. Where are the ambulance and the medical staff for the victims and wounded? Remember, according to the official count, 20 children and six adults were killed by a lone, a lamented shooter named Adam Lanzer. Well, we would have expected a surge of emergency medical technicians to rush the little bodies off the hospitals, but we had no surge of EMTs. We had no ambulances. There was no rush of the little bodies off the hospitals where doctors could pronounce them dead or alive. Instead, they were left in the classrooms, according to the official account, and only removed in the dead of night, not even the parents were allowed to see their children, but were instead shown photographs if we can believe what we've been told. There's another indication that something is wrong with the school. Notice this was taken on the day of the shooting. The handicap parking areas are not properly demarcated with white paint and blue markings. There are no above-grade signs with white lettering against a blue background that bear the words, handicap parking permit required, and violators will be fine, which means that Sandy Hook Elementary School was known Americans with Disability Act compliant. Just look here, and you see, none of the kind of parking areas that would have been required certainly prior to 2008 Sandy Hook ought to have been in compliance, and quite obviously it is not. Here's another photograph that's terribly revealing. This again, the complete absence of emergency vehicles, no ambulances. There is a fire engine down in the foreground, but that's it. You don't even see a lot of police cars present. As others have observed, there is no sense of urgency here. But most interesting, what I want to point out is that if you follow the driving instructions for the parking lot, you come and follow the area's arrows and you go to the right and then curl around to the left and to park, you'd have to park facing away from the school. But notice, all of the vehicles in those two middle rows are facing toward the school. That's obviously improper and indicates staging. When they set this up, they simply brought the vehicles in in a long line and fed them in two by two all facing toward the school. That was a blunder. It was an oversight and it's one of many clues we have that this was a staged event. Here's another. If you look at the following slide, you'll see that the school itself was in deplorable condition. It was the was mold, weeds, hanging wires, windows covered up, no buzzer. Remember to have a 10 out of 10 rating. You got to be immaculate inside and out. Let me tell you Wolfgang and I, Wolfgang Helbig, the Florida State Trooper and National School Safety Expert who's also been investigating Sandy Hook, who was simply dumbfounded when he got no response to his FOIA request. His phone calls weren't being returned and the next thing he knew, there were two local homicide detectives at his door telling him they were there on behalf of the Connecticut State Police. If he didn't stop asking questions about Sandy Hook, he would be prosecuted. Well, look at this school. It's in deplorable condition. It wouldn't come anywhere near to getting a 10 out of a 10 point scale. When Wolfgang and I visited Newtown, we discovered in particular the division known as Sandy Hook was immaculate. We visited a soccer field. Every blade of grass was manicured. This would not be an acceptable school in Sandy Hook. Here's another, I think, very revealing notice. No handicap accessibility. You got wind stairs and there's even a pipe extension sticking out. Little children remember, we're talking kindergarten who fourth grade could run and possibly lose an eye because of that. No principal would have stood for it. Look inside too. Here's a view of the ceiling. Notice the stains on the ceiling. This does not look like a properly kept school, but there's much, much more. Consider the next slide. Here we have a whole bunch of stuff, really, kind of randomly stored. A principal would not maintain a school in this kind of condition. There's more. Here notice, no handicap accessibility. In fact, it doesn't look right at all for little kids. The next is even more revealing. Look at all this furniture stacked up in the school room. We have had videos about Sandy Hook inside and out and listen to what some of those who have viewed the videos have had to say as the next slide displays. School looks as though it was used for storage. No organization apparent. Looks like material supply just thrown into lots of rooms. Strange findings. Guitar case and garbage in one of the bathrooms. Box on the floor and further sink. What was that for? Were the sinks too high for the kids? And there's supposed to stand on a box. Corona beer cart non-shelf. At 716 storage closet stacked with junk. 729 stuff piled up in front of exit door. 754 room full of boxes and storage containers. 848 dirty ground in tiles. Mold. 927 damaged dirty ceiling tiles. Perhaps the best comment of all came from Stephanie Solinski who makes it unmistakably clear that it's common practice for public school districts to use a decommissioned school as a storage yard for old furniture, which was the function of Sandy Hook. While her comments originated with the first of these videos, her observations are further substantiated by the second. Stephanie Solinski asks any teacher, janitor, school administrator. It is common practice for public school districts to use a decommissioned school as a storage yard for old furniture and items a district as little used for. This is exactly what's going on here. The fire marshal inspects each and every classroom every year when you have a functioning school, especially that close to a fire station where they were driving past a daily school. And there's no way he would have approved of all that large, bulky old furniture boarded up against the windows. Would have a fire broke out in the hallway in a fire block the door. How could small kids escape? The windows at ground level, of course, the story sank from the first five minutes as a former public school teacher for ten years. I've never seen a working school look like this, especially not an elementary in a fluid area. Fake, fake, fake as the day is long. There's another image, just an emphasize. Look at all that furniture stacked up against the window. And remember again, this was a kindergarten through a fourth grade school. And the 14th of December meant that many important celebrations for Christmas in Hanukkah were just around the corner. The schools should have been covered with Christmas and Hanukkah decorations, but you don't see any there. There's another observation to make about the principle in the law. Fraud, fraud, vitiates everything it touches. Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgment. What I'm talking about here is when you discover a case like the official reports about Sandy Hook and discover that it's vitiated by fraud because, as I'm demonstrating here, the school had been closed by 2008, then you are entitled to dismiss the entire case. This is a crucial material aspect of the case, and we have seen that it is false. The school had been closed by 2008. And when there was discussion after the event as to whether or not it ought to be rebuilt, the new town be, the local paper, explained that the school itself was loaded with asbestos and other hazardous materials, which would have been very difficult to rebuild. Now I'm confident that this is the reason why the school board had closed the school, at least my 2008. They knew it was contaminated. There's more to the story here of what happened, but notice in the image. The school has already been destroyed here, completely torn down. The area was turned to very fine dust as Wolfgang and I observed during our presence. Well, here's another crucial aspect of fraud and deception that vitiates the entire case. Practically everyone has seen this iconic photograph by Shannon Hicks. Take a look here and you'll see that day was a cold day. In fact, the temperature was 28 degrees. It was frost on the ground. Notice how you can see the exhaust coming from the automobile's air in the background. That by the way is not at the school, but at the firehouse where they turned the sign in order to take this photograph in this instance a relatively trivial piece of staging, but staging nevertheless. Look at the photograph. Here it is. This photograph was sent around the world. It was put on the front page of virtually every newspaper on earth. It shows what appears to be a policewoman leading a group of 15 students away from Sandy Hork. We're supposed to believe that this was as a result of the school massacre and they were fleeing to safety. Well the next image shows where they were situated in relation to the parking area. But this is also important because look at the roadway. This was only road in and out of the Sandy Hork school up and to the right and curving up. It was absolutely jammed with the vehicles. Not only are there no emergency vehicles coming and going to the school, it wouldn't have been even possible to get them in or out because the roadway was clogged. This is precisely the opposite of what you would expect if this had been a real deal. And look in the middle of the photograph, you see several tarps. This is a part of a FEMA system for handling victims of shootings and other mass casualty events. But no one's there. There's no one on those tarps. They weren't being used for anything. Well guess what? It turns out there was a second photograph taken by Shannon Hicks from further back. Notice what you would never have imagined to be the case. There's a whole string of parents there with arms folded looking on. If this had been a emergency situation, you wouldn't have the police woman there standing with the children. They would have been rushed off. In fact, it's very difficult to imagine she could have kept them in line because they would have been fleeing for their lives. So I was very puzzled by this photograph. We actually contacted Shannon Hicks to confirm its origin and look at the next message we heard from her. Mr. Fetzer's claim that the photo you set in your first email, which he also used in his recent post as a photo of me taking photos at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012. I'm not in that photograph. I took that photograph and I took it while covering the evacuation of Sandy Hook Elementary students on Friday, December 14. That is from Shannon Hicks, a photographer herself. Well take a closer look. See what we find when we take a look here in the next image. The children are being rearranged. The little boy who in the original photograph was in the front was moved to the back. A little girl who was further back was moved even further back. They were rearranging the children to get the best shot. And parents standing by with their arms folded. Anyone who believe that this is not a stage photograph. I mean look at the background too. No frost on the ground. You could excuse the kids not having their coats if they were being rushed out because of an emergency. But this was a stage photograph indeed. Wolfgang believes that it was actually taken as early as in October. So Shannon Hicks has admitted she took these photographs. It's obvious that they were staged. And here's yet one more close-up of in the background there. Notice? More parents in the background? I refer to this as lounging at the massacre. I mean this is absurd. No one in the world should believe that this was an actual photograph taken during the evacuation at Sandy Hook during a school emergency as Shannon Hicks claims. She's clearly deceiving us to this day even though we have proven that our photographs were staged. And here's what a real evacuation of Sandy Hook ought to have looked like. One after another after another of strings of kids being led away. According to the Danbury State's attorney Steven Siddinsky's final report about Sandy Hook, the actual number of students there that day was 489. So if you subtract 20 for those students who were allegedly killed, that would have met there should have been 469 students being evacuated not to mention the 75 additional personnel that janitors, the secretaries, the custodian and other staff. But when we go to the precise locations and the precise time that the police maintain, those children were being evacuated, dash cam footage shows they weren't there. And of course they weren't there. The school had been closed since 2008. There weren't any students to evacuate. I mean, it's hard to believe how much we have been scanned here. But this is another form of proof that demonstrates the entire story of the Sandy Hook school shooting massacre was a fraud in a hoax and there is much more. Now I'm going to consider there's no proof that Adam Lanzah actually killed anyone. There are many very strange aspects about what was going on here as this first slide shows. Namely we have Jean Rosen who had quite an elaborate story to tell about a group of students having been dropped off in front of his home which is right adjacent to the firehouse. And he said this five or six students came up to his house and he gave them orange juice and the plague was stuffed animals before they started talking about what had happened here. But there are a number of aspects of his story that simply don't add up. He even claimed that he heard shooting coming from the school but he didn't call 911. And why would any bus driver drop off with a duck kid? He didn't go out and do fourth grade at a home where Jean Rosen was not their parent or custodian. The story is ludicrous and it's merely a coincidence that no doubt that Jean Rosen belongs to the screen actor's guild. But look at the sign behind. Everyone must check in. Everyone must check in. Well that's very puzzling, very strange. I mean, would you arrange that at the scene of a criminal act as school shooting massacre? There's more. Look here. We find that porta-potties have been brought in. When Wolfgang Halbig sought to obtain information about who had delivered the porta-potties, he was not provided with an answer. Now you would think something as trivial as that. porta-potties would be something that would be readily ascertainable. I consulted with a New York Gold Shield detective of my acquaintance as to whether he'd ever heard of a crime scene where they brought in porta-potties and had a check-insign and he told me absolutely not. He'd never heard of such a thing. Here is another curiosity, namely that while there has been a lot of early concern that the names of the deceased did not show up in the Social Security death index, Adam Lanzza, the alleged shooter, was identified there as having died on the 13th, the day before the event was supposed to have taken place. Date of death, Thursday, December 13th, 2012. So what in the world is going on here? As you'll see in the next slide, a lot of activity was going on at the firehouse. It wasn't just going outside the firehouse where you did have some emergency vehicles, which were noticeably absent at the school. But other activities were going on inside the firehouse. Looking here in this slide, they had stocked up on bottled water. They had stocked up on bottled water. There are other photographs that show boxes of pizza in the firehouse. Does that make any sense to you at all? Does that make any sense to you at all that there should have been a school massacre and they would have bottled water, poured up bodies, a check-insign? And there's more. Check this out. It turns out that person after person on the scene was wearing a name tag on the land year. Look at that. He's got a name tag on the land year. Now imagine the official account were true. Imagine this had just happened that this young man had gone to the school and murdered these 20 kids and six adults. Where were these land years come from? I mean, bear in mind, land years have to be ordered in advance. They have to be printed up. And they were lots of places that day. Here's another illustration. Look at her. She's got a land year, a name tag on a land year. Here's yet another. More land years on name tags. And moreover, look at the parents and the child. Go back kindly. Look at the parents and the child. Would you, as a parent, as I'm a parent and a grandparent, would you think of bringing your child to a school shooting massacre? I ask you. I ask you. The very idea is absurd. So what's going on here? As an ex-slide shows, these badges correspond to FEMA identification codes for participants in a drill. The badge colors differ. If you're the director, white, the staff, black, controllers, green, evaluators, red, actors, orange, I mean, we have a whole system here of color coded name tags and why. What do we see going on here? We see evidence, indications that what's actually taking place is a drill. And would you believe, would you believe we've actually been able to discover the FEMA manual for this drill as the next slide shows? It's a 20 page document. I show you a couple of sections from it. Notice exercise summary about the preparation and so forth. The preparation for mash casualty, a drill will be conducted on 12, 13, 12. That is to say, 13 December, 2012, beginning at 8 a.m. Exercise, play a scheduled until the exercise director, controller, determines that the exercise objective has been met. Everyone must sign in with controllers upon arrival. The state's right in the FEMA drill manual. Everyone must check in, which explains the sign. And because the drill is taking place on the 13th, there was confusion in the minds of some of those who are participating. They recorded Adam Lanzas' death on the wrong day on the 13th. They could not reveal who had brought in the porta-potties because it would have disclosed that they were there on the 13th. Not the 14. And notice in this other segment, it says the exercise is expected to end at 11.59 p.m. on 12.13.12 and to be evaluated on 12.14.12 as a real time event. In other words, they were going to have the rehearsal on the 13. And that's why they had, you know, it even states in the manual that refreshments and restrooms will be provided. That's why they had the bottled water. That's how they could prepare the name tags and land yours in advance. The whole thing was planned exercise. It wasn't spontaneous. This wasn't a shooting by a demented young man. Now some apologists have sought to explain away by claiming there was another drill going on in Connecticut that day as the next slide shows. But the fact of the matter is this event was going on elsewhere in the state in Bridgeport from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on the 14th and did not involve the elements we saw at Sandy Hook. So while there was another event taking place elsewhere in the state, the manual we have in hand is the one for Sandy Hook. Now there are many more anomalous aspects of the official scenario. For example, this is the entry to the school. It was supposed to have had closed circuit security cameras which ought to have revealed the Adam Lanza at the door. This was a young man who was about six feet tall and weighed something less than 120 pounds who was heavily armed with lots of ammunition, a bushmaster. That's a civilian version of an AR-15 223 high-volostia ammunition and two handguns. They claim he blew his way. He shot his way in through the glass window. But look at that. Look at that opening. That would have been pretty awkward for a six-foot tall young man wearing all this equipment to have entered the building that way. However, we have some 16 Connecticut State troopers who claim they also entered the building this way. They have given sworn affidavits in support of the official account. But just think about it. This is absurd. You think you would have 16 Connecticut State troopers heavily armed entering through that glass window? As Wolfgang Helm, because observed even the three stooges would do better than that, one of them curly say would have entered and then got around and opened the door for Joe and Moe. And look, the furniture isn't out of place. You think you could have 16 troopers, not to mention Adam Lanzar come in. And other photographs show the glass on the ground. There is not rubbed into the carpet or the flooring. It's not crushed, which would be the case necessarily if you'd have 16 State troopers. And notice this magazine rack. The next slide shows the back of the magazine rack, which shows damage that appears to be a slug fired from a shotgun that was used to blast open that window. This is not the kind of small round hole you'd expect from a 223. The whole story of Adam Lanzar having entered this way, thus appears to be yet one more element in an elaborate hope. Now as we continue with these questions, we discover, okay, he had the three weapons I was describing. And we did have the medical examiner claiming that all the shooting had been done with a bushmaster. Here you see him during a press conference that was very odd indeed, where James Tracy was one of four professors. He and I and two other professors who have been involved in doing this research, along with Wolfgang Helmig, a national school safety expert, Paul Preston about whom more to come another school safety expert and dozens of others have been involved in this collaborative research. He gave a very bizarre press conference here where he even said in passing that he hoped this whole thing didn't come back to bite the city of Newtown, very odd. James Tracy picked up on it and wrote one of the very first articles addressing the oddities of this press conference, which you can find at his website, memoryholeablog.com. James Tracy was right on top of this. Now Wayne Carver also said all of the children were shot with a 223 bushmaster and that they had been hit anywhere from three to 11 times. Now I'm a former Marine Corps officer who used the Supervised Recruit Training in San Diego at Marksmanship Training at Edson Range, Camp Pendleton. This would be a phenomenal ratio of targets to kill. For this young man who not only was of slight build but allegedly suffered from osperger syndrome, which generally is consistent with a lack of motor control activity who even was described as having an aversion to metal to any contact with metal. Of course, you can't fire a weapon like this without coming into contact with metal. It preposterously remarkable shooting accomplishment here. In fact, an ATF agent explained that they had done a thorough research and you can find this in Top 10 Reason Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax which has a half a dozen authors and they'd been unable to find where either Adam Lonza or his mother had been conducting any shooting drills at anywhere in the vicinity. A whole business appears to be in concoction. Look at this, there were a couple of very insightful reports from the major media that day, even though subsequently they have fallen silent. They haven't followed up even on their own reports. But here our NBC is reporting that no assault rifles were used at Sandy Hook. And ABC is reporting that based upon consulting with federal state and local officials. And let me add that I'm not the only one familiar with marksmanship who's drawn the same conclusion that this would have been a preposterous feat. Joyce Riley on her show The Power Hour featured a guest to whom they referred as Mike Power who explained that this was preposterous that he could have possibly have done it. And Sophia Smallstorm in her wonderful video study of Sandy Hook entitled Unraveling Sandy Hook in two, three, four, and five dimensions. Begins with a monologue as a buses traveling to Sandy Hook by a fellow by the name of Mark S. Mann, another pseudonym of course who actually resides in Connecticut and is in law enforcement explaining how the shooting attributed to this young man was simply preposterous. It was beyond merely improbable. It was effectively impossible for him to have done the shooting. And here's another report rather fascinating too. Namely, the national news reporting that while the claim is that Adam Lonsa murdered his mother with a 22 caliber rifle shooting her five times and then came to the school that they were unable to establish that Adam Lonsa even existed. Now you think about this. You got a major news story. You got the national networks out there. The reporting on the one hand that the Bushnet master was not used directly contradicting the medical examiner. A whole story about the shooting is preposterous. He couldn't have done it. The AFT reports there's no evidence he had any marksmanship training at all. He's supposed to be suffering from mass burgers and now they find out according to the national press at the time that Adam Lonsa so far as they can discern did not even exist. While there's more, even more to the story. Here's the cover of the report by Dan Berry, state's attorney Steven Sedinski who has assigned the responsibility to investigate the case. His report runs around 40 pages long. There are many odd features about it, but the most important is shown here on the next slide. Namely, that at this point it's trivial to demonstrate the official report on Sandy Hook authored by Steven Sedinski does not establish a causal nexus between the shooters, his victims and the weapons he has allowed alleged to have used. It suffers from shortcomings of concluding that there were no fingerprints on the 22 rifle that it was allegedly used to shoot his mother. But it adds that there was a DNA reported to have been found on one shell casing, but it did not come from Adam Lonsa, but from some felon who was traced to another state. I mean, look, just pause and contemplate that beauty, that little finding. DNA from alleged felon from another state and you don't follow it up. And even more surprisingly, that the very large number of shots fired from the Bushmaster around 150 rounds of all those fragments, not one, could be matched to the weapon. That you find in a fascinating footnote, the most important in the entire report number 53, no positive identification could be made to any of the bullet evidence submissions. The physical condition of the bullet jacket surfaces were severely damaged and corroded. They all lacked individual styrated works of sufficient agreement for the identification process. I mean, this is shocking. Under these circumstances, it would have been impossible for the alleged shooter Adam Lonsa to have been convicted in a properly conducted court of law for his alleged offense, because no causal nexus has been established between the purported shooter, his weapons and the children and seven adults he is supposed to have killed, which one might have not evenly supposed was the point of this investigation. But if that was its goal, then its objective was not achieved. If there's ever been such an abysmal failure in the annals of forensic investigation, I would love to hear about it. This is absurd. Now, I have been asked whether a challenge, by being told that what I'm claiming is extraordinary and extraordinary claims require extraordinary support. Well, everything that I've been explaining is extraordinary. The school had been closed by 2008. There was no evacuation. The iconic photograph was staged. The Danbury State's Attorney Report doesn't establish a causal nexus. Here are some other points. The final report from Connecticut authorities does not include the names, the ages, or the sex of the alleged victims of the shooting. That is extraordinary. The clerk of Newtown entered into secret negotiation with the state legislature to avoid releasing their death certificates. That is extraordinary. Connecticut State Attorney Steven Sudinski opposed the release of the 911 calls. It had to be denied withholding them by the courts. That is extraordinary. That a special panel of the state legislates your recommended state employees who released information about Sandy Hook, be subject to an e-fellownee with a potential five-year term. That is extraordinary. That those who were involved in the demolition of the school building itself were required to sign lifetime gag orders about anything they saw or did not see. That is extraordinary. Think about just the points I've been making here. Is that more consistent with their having been a real shooting and real death? Or is that more consistent with this having been a fake event where they want to cover it up? I mean, consider it just the last. Anyone involved in the demolition of the building was required to take a lifetime gag order about what they saw or did not see. Where I'm convinced that would have included that they would not have seen any pools of blood on the floors of the classroom or any marks on the walls from all those bullets having been fired. I mean, after all, what good reason could there possibly be to withhold the names, ages, and sex of the deceased from the final reports about this child massacre? The claim was made that it was to spare the feelings of their parents. But think about it. The parents already knew their children were dead. This is absurd. And it gets worse. Paul Preston was a school safety expert from law, Sanjulas. He has supervised drills of this kind. He was very disturbed watching the events as it played out on the 14th of December. It did not look right to him. He was especially struck by what appeared to be the complete absence of a sense of urgency, urgency, get into the building, get those little bodies out, rush into hospitals, get a fire engines. I mean, you need ambulances. They didn't even call for the Madevac helicopters. Wolfgang noticed that immediately. Even for drills, they bring in Madevac helicopters. Who knows what's going to be needed? Who knows who's going to need to be transported rampantly to save their lives? He eventually contacted the company that has provided Madevac helicopters and they said they sat there by their phones waiting for them to ring. And they could not understand why they never rang. This is parallel to the fire captain at the fire station who is EMT qualified and who with his daughter who is also a member of the volunteer fire department, rushed down to the school and were denied access. Rush down to the school and denied access. Or at least that is what he has told us. I mean, there should have been a surge of EMTs. Paul Preston was so upset that he contacted officials he knows in the Department of Education of the Obama administration and they confirmed to him individuals he knows personally in the Obama administration that it had been a drill that no children had died and that it was done to promote an anti-Gonna agenda. The Indian article Sandy Hook Redux, Obama officials confirmed that it was a drill and no children died. You have the whole transcript there of his interview with Sophia Smallstorm. I think it will astonish you. Follow it up. Here's more. One of the alleged parents of the deceased who calls himself Lenny Posner. We have reason to believe his name is actually Leonard P. Osner claims to be the father of Noah Posner, one of the children who allegedly died at Sandy Hook. There you see a photograph and Noah is on the second row from the bottom, the third in. But he has made lots of attacks on those of us who have been seeking to fair it out the truth about this claiming plain on emotion that it's a twisted cruelty of Sandy Hook coaxers. We hear some photographs of Noah. And what's puzzling about this if you look up at the top, there seems to be a considerable difference in his appearance on January 25th of 2012 and February 26th of 2012 when these photographs were adduced. It's kind of odd. Even looks as though he's wearing a wig at the right hand. Here are other photographs of him. If this is a wig, why is he wearing it so many pictures with different lengths at different ages? In other words, Lenny sought to explain away why Noah didn't look like he looks in the upper left by claiming he was wearing a wig in the upper right, but it's very, very odd. But there's more. He had extensive conversation with Kelly Wat from Tulsa. They spent over 100 hours in conversation. She told him she didn't believe a thing he was telling her. She didn't believe he had a son who had died at Sandy Hook. She said she would appreciate if he could send her copies of his birth certificate and his death certificate. And believe it or not, Noah Posner, whom we believe is actually, you know, Leonard Posner, whom we believe is actually Leonard P. Osner sent her a copy of a death certificate. Here it is. And would you believe it's fake? It's a fabricated death certificate. This has been Photoshop. There are multiple different fonts that were used in putting this together. There are multiple indications that this is a fabricated document. Now ask yourself. Remember that principle fraud vishnates everything. If this had been a real event, then there would have been death certificates for all of these children that surely at the very least would have been released to their parents, although they have never been released to the public. There's a claim that they were sent to a journalist for the New York Post. But if he's got them, they haven't surfaced. And this one is a fraud. And that means Leonard Posner is a fraud. And that with overwhelming probability, his child did not die at Sandy Hook. And in fact, it's taken a strange bizarre twist as the next photo shows because you heard of the shooting in Pakistan, where there was kind of a parallel event. Well, it was not only a parallel event because a bunch of kids were supposed to have been shot, but they even got a photograph. Look right in the center toward the top. Right in the center toward the top. Doesn't that face look familiar? Look at the next image here. Here's a comparison, a close-up comparison. You have the image from Pakistan on the right. You got the image from Sandy Hook on the left. He's wearing the same jacket, the same coat with the same button hole. This is the same guy. So now we got Noah Posner, a dying twice, once at Sandy Hook, and then again in Pakistan. Kelly thought this was so bizarre that she wrote to Lenny Posner. And as you'll see in the next image, well, actually here, before we get to her exchange, even the BBC now is admitted that Peshawar victim photo is the alleged Sandy Hook victim, Noah Posner, is what the BBC had to say about it at the bottom. Another picture has been circulating online of victims of the Peshawar massacre, but the montage of images includes the photo of a young boy Noah Posner who died in the Sandy Hook massacre in the United States in 2012. So not even the BBC is taking the time to try to investigate what in the world is going on here. And of course, BBC is going to be playing along with the American government to conceal the fact that this entire event was a fraud, even though they have proof of it staring them in their face. And look at this now. Here is Kelly's exchange with El Posner. Check out this video on YouTube. She sends him. She shows him it's the photograph. She's had 150 people contact her in two days about it. And what is Len Posner who claims to be the father right back to Kelly? He says, let me know what you discover. This should get picked up by MSM, by the mainstream media, Len Posner. Think about this. He claims to be the father of this child who allegedly died at Sandy Hook. He's got a fabricated death certificate to support it, which of course refutes his claim. And now we have a photograph of his son having died twice, not only at Sandy Hook, but now in Pakistan. Is anyone not getting the picture here of the fraudulent dimensions of this case? And it's been reinforced by the FBI. Here's the Federal Consolidated Crime Statistics for the United States in 2012. This is from the FBI. If you look at that block marked in red, that's for New Town. The first category is population. The second category is violent crime, seven. The third is murder and non-negligent manslaughter. The number is a zero. A zero. So the FBI Consolidated Crime Report for 2012 shows zero murders in New Town in 2012. Interestingly, even the Crime and Connecticut's own report substantiates that. This is statistics for Crime and Connecticut in 2012. Look, the very first vertical column is for murder. And when you look at the left hand side, murders for those less than 10 years of age, the number there is a zero. A zero. Now you would think that the mass media would be rather fascinated by all this because it's showing that the FBI and even the Connecticut itself is reporting zero murders in New Town for the age of these children. But here in the back, in a little note at the end, notice that the bottom it says, and this is like 200 pages back in this report. Murders number 27 note includes 27 victims of New Town mass shooting, but ask yourself. We already know there were no murders in New Town. We already have seen that from their own report. The FBI shows no murders in New Town. So how can this note be reconciled with the fact that there were no murders in New Town? This is just a dodge. It was easy to type in this little note, but it's not substantiated by the FBI. It's not even substantiated by Connecticut's own crime reports. I mean, if those were real murders, then they had to occur somewhere. But if you review the data, they did not occur anywhere in Connecticut. I mean, give us a break, and there's more. As the next slide shows, given how much searching there has been for the social security of the names of these children and the social security death index, now they have suddenly popped up. Just as Adam Lanzah, however, has now had his date of death change from the 13th to the 14th, we now have a list of 19 of the alleged victims, which wasn't there before. There's no good reason to believe this is accurate. It's a cover-up. I mean, faking documents and identification in the like is an area specialization of the CIA. The FBI is known to indulge in this practice as well. The federal government was involved in all of this. This goes from the local police, the Connecticut state police, with the absurd claim that 12 or 16 state troopers entered in that broken glass cut out window all the way up to the governor and the lieutenant governor Eric Holder, our attorney general, and Barack Obama, as we are about to see. This is just a part of flimsy effort to cover up. Would you believe on January the 16th, 2013? This is slightly over. This is a month and two days after the alleged shooting on December 14th. Barack Obama signed 23 executive orders to limit the gun ownership of Americans. In violation of the Second Amendment, he doesn't care about the fact that he's a president. He doesn't care about the Second Amendment. He's been quoting the saying Americans aren't entitled to own guns. We know Eric Holder's attitude about this. What more is going on? Check out the next slide. We had noticed that there had been no lawsuits filed against the school district. So at the last minute, now some families in Newtown have filed lawsuits in a perfunctory effort to obviate the obvious complaint against the official account that the parents had not filed lawsuits. In every other school shootings, lawsuits have been abundant and propped in Sandy Hook that was not the case. This is a trivial add-on to try to cover up the reality that no children died at Sandy Hook. There is more. Not only is this event motivated by the desire to subvert the Second Amendment, which Obama and Holder have been pursuing aggressively, but that those parties involved have been benefiting financially. More than $27 million has been donated to the survivors of the victims of Sandy Hook by a gullible American public. That's at least a million per family. In fact, I have been told that my 27 is far short of the actual number if they even be closer to $300 million. Not only that, but there have been several federal grants coming from the government to the first responders, namely to the Connecticut State Police, where we have footage of them out in the parking lot actually having lunch, which would make no sense at all if this were in the wake of an actual child shooting. If you see a bunch of little children who have been slaughtered by being hit three to 11 times as Wayne Carver maintained, you're not going to be in the mood to have anything to eat for quite some time. They've got some here. This is a $775,000 federal grant to overcome the stress and trauma that they endured. To provide mental health services and support for victims or families, and there's at least another 500,000 being divvied up for the first responders and get this. Newtown has received a grant of $50 million to build a new school, $50 million. If you were to review the cost of an elementary school for kindergarten through fourth grade across the country, the average expense is $7 million. So why is Newtown getting $7 times $7 million to build a new elementary school in Sandy Hook? What is this going to be? The Taj Mahal of elementary schools? Think about it. The situation is completely absurd and there is more. The governor, Maloy, created a Sandy Hook commission that was supposed to offer advice about what should be done in the wake of the shooting. They were not responsible for investigating the crime, but they were notified repeatedly that no crime had been committed. I personally sent a post to the Sandy Hook commission enumerating some among my now 35 or more articles about Sandy Hook. How do we establish that the school had been closed by 2008? How do we establish that no children to evacuate? How do we establish that the Sandy, Shannon Hicks, iconic photograph had been staged? How do we point it out that the official report didn't establish a causal nexus relating the shooter to his victims or his firearms, and yet they come out with this proposition very much in accordance with the Barack Obama-Eric Holder agenda that they should ban guns that can fire more than 10 rounds without reloading, completely obscene, ablating violation of the Constitution, which has been promoted by two public servants who have sworn in oath to preserve protected the fed, the Constitution of the United States, which are in fact subverting, and yet here's more. Now we have the latest report. Look at the date here, February 16, 2015. Friday night dump, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Farms, and Explosive is going to ban the common-air 15 ammo. We're talking about the 223 caliber ammunition that Adam Lonsa allegedly used to shoot his way into the school and to mask her all those children, even though the ATF couldn't find any evidence that he had a marksmanship training and three different experts have reported that his phenomenal kilotarget ratio was not only improbable but actually literally impossible. This is such an enormous stunt. It is shocking to me that the government is attempting to pull the wool over the eyes of the American public. I'm distraught that it has been taking place. But that's what we know about Sandy Hook. The whole event was an elaborate charade. Stop and think about it. We even have the FEMA manual that shows it was a rehearsal on the 13th and that they were going to go live on the 14th, which is why we can't get the dates of the porta-potties. We can't get an explanation for the name tags on land-years. We can't get why they would have bottled water and refreshments at the firehouse. The whole situation is absurd once you look at the big picture. Just ask yourself, is everything I've been explaining here more probable if this was a real event or is it more probable if it was a fake? I don't think you're going to have that much difficulty sorting it out. And now I suggest you stand by because the rest of our program is going to be devoted to the events at the Boston bombing, which I guarantee are going to blow off your socks. Just as what you have just learned about Sandy Hook has no doubt done for most of you. This is Jim Fetzer, your host on the real deal. Thank you for watching this presentation, this update about Sandy Hook. And encouraging you to stand by for an update on the Boston bombing. We can now say with moral certainty and considerable scientific authority that the depth of JFK was committed by a meticulously executed conspiracy, which was obscured by an extensive cover-up. Murder in Dele Plaser edited by James Fetzer goes to the heart of the JFK assassination. He'll read new and up-to-date information regarding the secret service, the Lincoln limousine, the medical evidence, the cover-up, altering the film, framing the patsy, and the silent historians. Also, 16 smoking guns each one crushing the government's loan assassin scenario, a world-class chronology of November 22, 1963. Chapters by David W. Mantic, Gary Aguilar, Vincent Palamara, Douglas Weldon, Jack White, Ira David Wood III, James H. Fetzer, Doug Horn, and a classic essay by Bertrand Russell. The complete story in the pages of one single book edited by James H. Fetzer. Read it now, read it again, you'll use it as a reference. Murder in Dele Plaser, available at amazon.com and major bookstores around the world. It's Murder. Less than 3% of you people read books, because less than 15% of you read newspapers. Right now there is a whole and entire generation that never knew anything that didn't come out of this tube. This tube can make or break presidents, hopes, prime ministers, television is not the truth. Television is a circus, a carnival, a traveling troupe of acrobats, storytellers, dancers, singers, junglers, side show freaks, lion tamers, and football players. We did it illusions, man, Murder is true, but you people sit there day after day, night after night, all ages, colors, creep. Broadcasting live on network radio. So turn off your television, turn them off now, turn them off and leave them off. This is Jim Fatser, your host, on the radio. In Dallas, Texas, three shots were fired at President Kennedy's motorcade. It looks like one of those scenes of an old building being perpetually dynamited and blown. When we are successful, I'm getting the shot of the... And we will be. You ready to make to come to the microphone? So, it's a little listener. A new world order. My name is Robbie Parker. It might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11th. President Kennedy died at 1pm. Live from the media broadcasting center. This is Jim Fatser, your host, on the real deal. Continuing with my special update about Sandy Hook, and now the Boston bombing, if the objective of the Sandy Hook hoax was to create a cadre of anti-gun lobbyists with apparently impeccable credentials to spread out across the country to promote the Eric Holder Barack Obama program to undermine and subvert the Second Amendment. The purpose of the Boston bombing appears to have been conducted to subvert the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable search and seizure, as well as to undermine posse-coma-tottas, a statute from 1878 that precluded the use of military force to perform police functions, where I'm going to explain what happened in Boston now. During my presentation in Northfield at the Public Library, where we had a wonderful turnout of standing room only when the question period continued, a member of the audience by the name of Victor Summa said that he thought my presentation, my evidence, was invalid. Now there's a strict technical sense in logic in which he was impeccably correct because validity is a property that relates premises to conclusions when they are deductive, such that if the premises are true, then the conclusion cannot possibly be false. In a case of this kind, however, we're not dealing with deductive reasoning exclusively, but rather with empirical evidence and inductive reasoning, where it's possible that the conclusion could be false, even though the evidence is completely authentic. In that sense, Mr. Summa was clearly mistaken. The evidence is simply overwhelming that not only was the Boston bombing clearly contrived event, but that the authorities knew that to be the case. So when Victor raised his question, I responded by pointing out that we had tweets from the Boston globe that were being issued during the event that we had the police on bull horns calling out, this is a drill. This isn't drill and other indications that were so blatant that they left no room for doubt about it. And I took that opportunity to play this clip from the Boston bombing that reviews that evidence, which I will play again to conclude this presentation. Take a look. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Have a nice day. Have a nice day. Have a nice day. Have a nice day. Have a nice day. Have a nice day,循 спокой. Have a nice day, our *** Have a nice day, everyone. Thank you. Have a nice day, everyone. Have a nice day, everyone. Have a nice day, everyone. Have a nice day, everyone. Have a nice day, everyone. Have a nice day, everyone. Have a nice day, everyone. Have a nice day, everyone. Have a nice day, everyone. Let's see. We're all dressed up, right? You outta here!! KATHY TAPE THAT'S RIGHT KIM. BRAW kuv bomb sniffing dogs and bomb spotters on the roofs at the starting line and it appeared to him there are some sort of active threat before the explosions went off. At the start line this morning they had bomb spotted on the roofs of the building and they had bomb sniffing dogs coming up and down at the start line and Melanie said there was bomb sniffing dogs at the finish line but they kept making announcements saying that the participants do not worry if it's a training exercise and we were told on a loud announcement that we shouldn't be concerned if it's just a drill. So maybe it was just a drill but I mean I was there, the athletes village, I did see it as real going on and did hear the announcements that it was just a drill. With 35 years of experience offering courses in logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning, I have come to appreciate the importance of the repetition of key points. So here's a slide from the video you have just seen in which in the background you can hear the police on a bullhorn announcing this is a drill. This is a drill. So clearly the police were aware that what was going on was a drill. Here's a, in the next slide you see the first of the two tweets from the Boston Globe officials. There will be a controlled explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities from the Boston Globe. And here indeed one minute later is what we heard. In the key news please will have controlled explosion on 600 block on Boyleston Street. And in the next we see the situation where indeed the explosion took place and guess what opposite the Boston Public Library just as the Boston Globe announced. Bearing in mind that the Boston Globe is one of the world's great newspapers and incidentally in case anyone missed it is located in Boston. Here's another slide that begins to give us more of an idea of what was taking place. Now this is significant and you can see in the distance that an earlier bomb had taken place. So this was the second that these were very modest demonstration bomb, something akin to a sawdust bomb. And I say that as a former Marine Corps artillery officer the difference between what we're seeing here and what a 105 or a 155 howitzer shall bring about is completely totally different. This is roughly child's play compared to what a real a serious explosion would have looked like. Now it turns out that the alternative media were actually extremely successful in cracking the Boston bombing already the day of the event. As the following slides shows the actual perps were members of craft international which is a private army very much like a black water. See them dressed in their khaki trousers, black jackets. They even had a black baseball cap which you'll see subsequently but notice here on the left. You have two of their personnel one of whom is wearing a black backpack with a white square on the back which becomes quite significant. Here's a skull cap in the signature that we find on the caps of craft international where its motto is violence does solve problems. And as we proceed we'll discover that we have video of them coming up to the location where one of the backpacks exploded. We see that the black pack that exploded was a black backpack with a white square on it and then we see them rushing away where the fellow had been wearing it is no longer wearing the black backpack with a white square. This is not rocket science. They came, they delivered the backpack, they ran away. Now here's a slide illustrating the effects of what took place. We have a certain amount of smoke and we have parties that appear to be injured where the one more or less in the center or to the left is being assisted by someone wearing a hoodie will understand more about what they're doing. But where we have extensive reports from persons such as Lorraine May who spent 25 years as an orthopedic surgeon at San Francisco's General Emergency Hospital dealing with all kinds of injuries for automobile accidents, gunshot victims, those attempting to commit suicide who makes a simple astute point that it's impossible for these injuries to have occurred, to have actually occurred and for blood not to be present simultaneously. For blood not to be present simultaneously but notice no blood. Look at the next, here's the next slide and we get a little better idea of what that fellow in the hoodie is doing. He's actually attaching a false prosthesis with a bone extension. You can see it rather clearly on the left side of the left image. A bone extension, notice still no blood, no blood. Where is the blood? Something is completely wrong here as we are going to get further confirmation. Here's another slide now where the blood starts to show up. Now what's important about this is it's right red blood. It even has an orangeish tint which is very different than real blood. Real blood oxidizes and turns dark red. Notice the fellow with the false prosthesis there is not writhing in pain. That is not spurting out of his leg. He's not even flat and horizontal which would be the right position for him to begin to try to cease the flow. Here's the further confirmation that what we're seeing is not real blood. Look in the lower left. Real blood from the bomb in Cairo. Here we have multiple indications that things aren't right. Look on the right circle. Shoes are comparatively clean even though there's blood everywhere. In top right jeans are ripped but no appearance of injuries. In the middle, no one is helping the person who is more injured than anyone else in the photo appears to be. No one is assisting him. The arrow indicating the blood is not the right color as you can see by the comparison with blood from the bombing in Cairo. In the next slide, you see the image of a woman who reportedly broke both her tibia and her fibula on both legs and severed her Achilles tendon. She sat there for over 20 minutes with nobody attending to her while her husband ignored her waiting for her cover shot by the mainstream media. Now this is one tough girl because look, here we have athletes, professional athletes who have suffered less injuries but of the same kind and look how they are expressing immense pain. But we don't have any pain here being displayed by Nicole Brannick-Groes for the obvious reason that she did not actually suffer those injuries but she's acting. Here's another indication of what's going on. We have a tendon of victim and look how that blood on her leg is completely artificial. Might even be an orange hankerchief for all of that. But notice in particular, the adidas sign isn't it remarkable. We haven't have a sign for adidas sporting equipment which is outside of where the bomb reportedly took place and has no holes in it. Not a single hole in it. Something here is terribly, terribly wrong. Our next slide is a report from Nathan Fokes who is a Hollywood producer and director. He's a film, a talent manager who has been in the entertainment business since 1997 when he worked at Paramount Marketing the Blockbuster Titanic starring Leonardo DiCaprio which is one of my own favorite films during an interview with the voice of Russia. Fokes said that back in April of 2013 while watching the events at the Boston Marathon based on his experience and expertise as a movie producer, he thought things just didn't add up and became convinced that the bombings were a false flag designed to instill the fear factor in us to keep us scared for as long as they can. The Boston bombing wasn't real but a hyper reality filmmaking he described as an inactive terrorism that wasn't real. Now Nathan was very, very good not only in spotting it as hyper realistic filming where you strive to make a situation of fear as realistic as possible for the benefit for example of inexperienced troops so they get a sense of what they might experience in combat but he identified as an excellent show one of the key players, the man in the cowboy hat, as an actor he had cast in one of his own films. Now there are several things to note here, the fellow who is lying on the ground where the man in the hoodie was attaching a false prosthesis as now been put in a wheel chair. Anyone with experience with traumatic injuries of this kind is aware that that is the last thing you want to do. They need to be kept on the horizontal to try to keep gravity from assisting in the flow of blood because you can after bleeding out for one minute you'll be rendered unconscious too you'd be dead but here is in a wheelchair being whisked away by a man with a man named Nathan Hulks as identified as an actor who's holding a loose rag as though it were a turnip but it's too loose to do any good and would you believe the vibrations were so great that it caused the false prosthesis to fall off and they had to stop and reattach it. Now believe it or not as the next slide shows, 17 days later someone purported to be the same person who is known by the name of Jeff Bowman appeared at a Boston Bruins hockey game and received a standing ovation for his heroism. In an interview I did with Dr. Stan Montyth, well known to many radio listeners, he explained that as an orthopedic surgeon himself he had performed many of these amputations and that it takes about three months to recover from the amputation itself in another three months to learn how to get around without your legs. He also observed something striking here namely that the fellow waving the flag has now had his amputations above the knee whereas the purported victim we saw before had his amputations below the knee during our conversation and discussion when I explained to Dr. Stan about the attachment of the false prosthesis. He explained that he had now been forced to conclude that this young man was an actor. And indeed as you see from the next slide he appears to have lost his legs in combat in Afghanistan. He did not lose them on a Boyd Austin street during the Boston Marathon bombing and indeed it turns out if this comes as a surprise that the DHS has a form for actors to recruit amputate actors where I show you here is the form in the next slide for that they use actor waiver form. On behalf