Ongoing Lies Propaganda & Demonization of Syria and The Middle East Mirror

Video Transcript:

President Obama signed a bill that allows the U.S. government to combat foreign propaganda by creating its own. Now let's be clear, this is being sold as countering propaganda, but how do you do that? After all, if government agencies put out information to the public for the sake of altering the point of view, isn't that the very definition of propaganda? In fact, that definition is this, information, ideas or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, a group of movement and institution, a nation, etc. So this law essentially funds U.S. propaganda, but isn't that illegal? It was. No, not anymore, because three years ago, wrapped inside the 2013 NDAA, was an amendment that removed the ban on the U.S. government creating propaganda and then showing it to U.S. citizens. That ban, by the way, has been in place since 1948. The 2013 amendment struck down a ban on domestic dissemination of propaganda material produced by the State Department and the independent broadcasting board of governors. It neutralized the Smith-Month Act of 1948 and the Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987 that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government's misinformation campaigns. And in 2013, when that bill was passed, most media said, oh, don't worry, the U.S. government will never actually create propaganda. Well, now they've created the mechanism to fund it. Of these 242 images appear to depict real people and events. Who said that? The FBI. Have you seen their report? No. When was that? That was 2015. Yeah. The question, when your institutions were honest about what's happening in Syria? That the question. Never. For us, never. So we don't have to rely on what they say. Whether if the FBI says something is not something, it's not evidence for anyone, especially for us. The most important thing. If you take these photos to any court in your country, could they convict any criminal regarding this? Couldn't they tell you what this crime, who committed? If you don't have this full picture, you cannot make judgment. It's just propaganda. It's just fake news. They want to deny the Syrian government. In every wall, you can have any individual crime. It happened all over the world anywhere, but it's not a policy. If I hear what you're saying, the FBI is just forwarding propagating propaganda. Amnesty international is propagating propaganda. Everybody is conspiring against the Syrian government. Why? Ask them. We don't know when making the allegation. No, no, I'm not making an allegation. They support the terrorists. And you go back to what they said. Mary, a few months ago, said by his voice that we were watching ISIS advancing and we expected the Syrian president to make concessions. What does it mean? Obama said it in one of his speeches that the war on Iraq had created ISIS. So who supported ISIS? We didn't create it. You created it. Did ISIS create all these myths? We supported the rebels and called them moderate rebels while they became ISIS and Al-Masra and Syria. We didn't. So it's not a conspiracy. These are facts. This is reality. We didn't give money. We didn't support these terrorists. Your country supported them. UK, France, publicly, and they said they said armament. We didn't know any other information. We don't know if the whole pictures or video that we've been seeing are true or fabricated. That's why we asked for investigation into what happened in Hanzihon. This is the second al-Qaeda source to say that the attack happened at 6.6.30 in the morning while the Syrian attack in the same area was at around noon between 11.30 to 12. So they're talking about two different stories or events. So there was no order to make any attack. We don't have any chemical weapons. We gave up our arsenal three years ago. Even if we have them, we wouldn't use them. And we had never used our chemical arsenal in our history. So what happened this day? As I said, the only source is al-Qaeda. We cannot take it seriously. But our impression that the West, mainly the United States, is hand in glove with the terrorists. And we have to be able to replicate the whole story in order to have a pretext for the attack. It wasn't attacked because of what happened in Hanzihon. It's one event. It's the stage one, the play that we saw on the social networking and on TV, the propaganda. And the stage two, the military attack. That's what we believe is happening because it's only few days, two days, 48 hours, between the play and the attacks. And no investigations, no concrete evidence about anything. The only thing were allegations and propaganda and then strike. So we are according to you, is responsible about this, the chemical attack. The allegation itself, by al-Qaeda, and not from the front. So we don't have to investigate who. They announced it. It's under their control, no one else. About the attack, as I said, it's not clear whether it happened or not. Because how can you verify a video? You have a lot of fake videos now. And you have the proof that those videos were fake, like the white helmets, for example. They are al-Qaeda, they are a Mustafaunt who shaved their beard, wore white hats, and appeared as humanitarian heroes. Which is not the case. The same people were killing civilians, soldiers, and you have the proof on the internet. So the same thing for that chemical attack. We don't know whether those dead, the children, were the kids in the country, where they did at all, who committed the attack if they were the attack. What the matter? You have no information at all, nothing at all, no investigated. So you think it's a fabrication? Definitely, 100% false, it's a... The allegedly fell hundreds of meters from the sky, braided this big hole in the ceiling, and then magically fell on the bed meters away from that hole, without any visible damage to the canister or the bed, or any of the mirrors that were directly underneath that hole. Oh, and the canister is still closed. Lothole number 10. On April 9, the Russians came to investigate these alleged attacks and reported no signs of chemical weapons. On April 10, the day after the Russians visited, a second canister was magically found by the white helmets and was posted to their Twitter. This is just coincidentally the same group that filmed the video from the hospital, and again receives millions of dollars a year in funding from this war continuing. This is the very definition of a false flag. A political or military act orchestrated in such a way that it appears to have been carried out by a party that is not in fact responsible. And I've only seen one person in the mainstream media pushing against this narrative, and that's Tucker Carlson. What is the American national security interest that would be served by regime change in Syria? Well, if you care about Israel, you have to be interested at least in what's going on in Syria. The US was weighing up how much support to give the rebels. The CIA was already on the ground mainly in Turkey, monitoring the arms and cash entering Syria from supporters in Arab states. Now the CIA came up with a plan to vet, train, and arm the rebels themselves. I remember very well in 2012, that's inside the State Department about how long Assad would last. And the betting was it was either going to be by Thanksgiving 2012 or Christmas. That's how sure we were that the Free Syrian Army, which we were supporting, was going to get the upper hand and win. Look about how the United States military was going to take out seven nations in five years, starting with Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and then Iran. So, I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, we're still going to war with Iraq, and he said, oh, it's worse than that. He said, he reached over on his desk, he picked up a piece of paper, and he said, I just got this down from upstairs, meaning Secretary of Defense Office today. And he said, this is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and China, Iran. This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq. The Fellow Citizens. At this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people, and to defend the world from great danger. And then Syria. We had a chance to talk about a wide range of international issues including the situation in Syria decisions. And I have to say that all of us who've been seeing the terrible pictures coming out of Syria and homes recently recognize it is absolutely imperative for the international community to rally and send a clear message to President Assad that it is time for a transition. This time for that regime to move on and it is time to stop the killing of Syrian citizens by their own government. Lebanon both has different reasons to stay in the White House for it. Lonning Israel's to do it, encouraging the visits, supporting them, our Air Force worked very closely with the Israeli Air Force for months before this. Not necessarily with a deadline knowing when it would happen. It was always going to be whenever there was an incident they would take advantage of an incident of the word I used was fortunate timing when the Hezbollah grabbed some of the Israeli soldiers in early July. That was then a pretext I think that's the only word for a major offensive that had been in the works a long time. Today we can definitively say that the Gaddafi regime has come to an end. The last major regime strongholds have fallen. The new government is consolidating the control over the country. And one of the world's longest serving dictators is no more. Shamali. Well violence isn't only on the rise in Afghanistan. In fact it looks like America's shadow wars have now increased by one. Drone strikes have long been reported in Pakistan and Yemen but now there's news that a week ago the US drone aircraft fired on two leaders of a Somali organization Al Shabbat. Sudan. President Obama is sending 100 combat equipped troops to Central Africa to advise local forces on getting rid of one of the continent's most vicious operatives. Joseph Kony, the head of the Lord's Resistance Army, a group responsible for atrocities across the region. It's the first open deployment of US ground combat power to Africa since the Black Hawk down incident in Somalia in the 1990s that killed 18 troops. US troops may wind up now in Uganda, South Sudan, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It's part of a growing military effort to engage in Africa. One thing that is clear is that Syria is one of the last nations in the world that is fighting this one-world system. And there seems to be a lot of propaganda being pushed to demonize Syria and to get the people on board with attacking this nation especially for the interest of Israel. Trump is a Zionist and Trump is pushing this Israel agenda in order to do the same thing that we've done with all these other nations that used to be fighting this one-world system that we completely eradicated. We're running out of time and this Zionist propaganda needs to be exposed and people need to wake up and realize that there isn't agenda for a one-world order that is being pushed right before our eyes. We need to wake up before it's too late. We need to wake up and realize that there isn't agenda for a one-world order that is being pushed right before our eyes. We need to wake up and realize that there isn't agenda for a one-world order that is being pushed right before our eyes. We need to wake up and realize that there isn't agenda for a one-world order that is being pushed right before our eyes. We need to wake up and realize that there isn't agenda for a one-world order that is being pushed right before our eyes. We need to wake up and realize that there isn't agenda for a one-world order that is being pushed right before our eyes. We need to wake up and realize that there isn't agenda for a one-world order that is being pushed right before our eyes. The last thing I want to say is that I don't want to be a person who is in the right place. I want to be a person who is in the right place. I want to be a person who is in the right place. I want to be a person who is in the right place. Do you, do you have the final say? Was it you for instance that decided to get rid of the weapons of mass destruction? I don't know. Because you know, man will keep you and you know, and you go to the restaurant. The restaurant he looks up at the shop. So what about the people who see you as a dictator? Is that a word that you will not tolerate? I don't know. I don't know. A man who is a prisoner, by many people in the West, is a person and a danger to peace and democracy. How do you describe yourself to people who say that? Will we wrong about you? I don't know. I'm a living man in the South. I'm a living man. I'm a living man. Thank you. That's very generous. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.