BREAKING: Global Government Crowned; WEF & WHO Meetings In Switzerland To ENSLAVE HUMANITY

Video Transcript:

The WHO agreement, the IHR International Health Regulations, has just been agreed to by the United States and all other present members. So we're going to be talking about this and more. There's two conferences going on right now in Switzerland. There's the WHO meeting the World Health Organization meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, and then right down the road in Davos, Switzerland, there's the World Economic Forum meeting. Some interesting things that came up across my desk that I wanted to share. So first of all let's look at what they actually just agreed to. Here is this insane lunatic, Dr. Tedros telling us what they just agreed to. Listen to this crap. In response to the request from the executive board and in consultation with member states, the Secretary has prepared a proposal for a more equitable, inclusive and coherent global architecture. This proposal synthesizes and builds on more than 300 recommendations from the various review of the global response to the pandemic. The international accord, which member states are now negotiating, will provide a vital overarching legal framework under which we make 10 recommendations in three key areas. First, we need governance that's coherent, inclusive, and accountable. Legal framework and governance is what he said so far. This is a scientific dictatorship, a one-world global government, and all of these nations just relinquished the power of the people to these rich oligarchs. All of these leaders have sold their soul and have sold their countries. I'm sure many of them regret that they have but one country to give for their lives. It's absolutely insane. These people need to be dealt justice, immediately. Absolutely unacceptable, intolerable, grotesque enslavement of humanity. This is practically the death blow to freedom. Second, we need stronger systems and tools to prevent, detect, and respond rapidly to health emergencies. Stronger response, we need more tools, more systems. They're not done, folks. This is absolutely insane. Scientific dictatorship, totalitarianism, and note the word he used there, health. In a future clip, he's going to say, we cherish the rights of individuals to health. And that's their excuse, right? That's always their excuse. Oh, we're public health. We're just taking away the rights of the individual, but it's going to help everybody. Just turn away your medical autonomy. Turn away all your freedoms. Where your muzzle inject your poison. And third, we need adequate and efficient financing domestically and internationally. Financing, so robbing us, robbing us and then locking us down, like they've done already over and over and over again. Underpinning these proposals, we need a stronger and sustainably financed WHO at the center of the global health security architecture. And I will return to this in a few moments. All right, so let's keep going here. That's just the first clip. Here's another clip I wanted to share. So here's another clip of Tedros talking about how everybody has to help each country get up to 70% vaccination. And notice they're doing all of this in a well-timed fashion right before they're about to tell people they're going to need boosters every few months. They have to announce this first. 70% threshold. We need 70% of the country's fully vexed. And then they'll tell you what the definition of fully vexed just changed to. It's absurd. Listen to this. We call on all countries that have not yet reached 70% vaccination coverage to commit to achieve it as soon as possible. And to what does that even mean? Most every country has more than enough supply of the vaccine. It's just people not wanting to take it. So what are the countries going to do? Coerce people? Give people the death sentence of forbidding them from working in this capitalistic economy? This is so obscene. It's beyond ridiculous. These people need to be taken out. Prioritize the vaccination of all health workers, all over 60s, and everyone. But what about the Nuremberg Code, Tedrus? Did you just say all? What about people who can't take these dangerous vaccines? Because their bodies won't tolerate them. What about our God-given rights just say no. No, we don't want your injection. Go fuck yourself. What about people who have strong religious objections to taking these injections? That are rushed and experimental and failing miserably. Mark my words in a few weeks and months. They're going to tell people they need more and more and more and more and more. The fact they're forcing this crap that doesn't even work long-term, that is dangerous and could kill you? Is disgusting. These people are the scum of the earth. Drug foresters, there's a special place in health for you, lad. You're fucking disgusting. Unacceptable. Increased risk. We call on those countries that have reached 70% to support those that have not. We call on all countries to maintain surveillance and sequencing. We call on all countries to be prepared to reintroduce and I just public health and social measures as necessary. So there you go. They're not done. They just admitted that the WHO who just got crowned King of the World, or I guess that's Satan probably. I guess they'll announce that next week probably at the rate we're going. Not my king, not my king, that's for sure. But all the nations just gathered together for the coronation of the WHO who just told everybody, yeah, get ready. We're going to need a lot of funding and we're about to tell you to shut yourselves down. This is absurd guys. This is highway robbery and kidnapping. These people are some of the worst criminals ever. Absolutely disgusting. Absolutely despicable. We call on all countries to restore essential services as rapidly as possible. So here they go again. You're essential. You're not essential of the essential services. So let me guess is this the point where you guys tell me I'm not essential? Fuck you. And we call on all countries to work with your communities to build trust. But of course, the pandemic is not the only crisis in our world. As we speak, our colleagues around the world are responding to outbreaks of Ebola in DRC, monkeypox and hepatitis of unknown cause and complex humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan, the city. Wait a second. Complex humanitarian crisis. So here they go. They can't help themselves already. They're using this loophole and their stupid rules they've made for themselves. Where it's any health problem, they can step in and seize total control. Oh, there's a humanitarian crisis. So I guess we're in charge. Oh, some people keep getting shot. I guess we're in charge. Oh, some people are becoming delusional and they're engaging in conspiracy theorizing the WHO could take control. I mean, this is absolutely insane. There are so many different things that they could call a health emergency. These people are a joke. This is the biggest scam ever. People need to get pissed. People need to get pissed. They're an Arab Republic, Ukraine and Yemen. We face a formidable convergence of diseases, drought, famine and war fueled by climate change in equity. Wow. There's so much he just said there. Food shortage, drought, inequity, climate change, I mean, that should set off a ton of alarm bells. Red lights should be flashing. All the countries just handed over power to the WHO for health and he just listed off some of the most broad overreaching, ridiculous establishment narratives. Just rattle them off. Oh, humanitarian crises, climate change. Soon it'll be overpopulation. It's a formidable convergence of diseases, drought, famine and war fueled by climate change in equity and geopolitical rivalry. War. So we're going to step in because of the health implications of war and we need money. Okay, so this was the news that we started off with. America along with other present members have agreed to the implementation of the IHR, international health regulations, the pandemic treaty. This is Pell Ham doing a great job finding these clips. Listen to this disgusting traitor. This is the rep for the United States handing over relinquishing power to the WHO fucking O face battling COVID-19 and working to improve the global health architecture systems and tools to prevent prepare for and respond to the next pandemic to come. Improving and modernizing the IHR is critical to ensuring the world is better prepared for and can respond to the next pandemic. There is no greater duty for governance than keep for governments than keeping their citizens safe and free from danger. This includes health threats that can so easily move across borders and spread across the globe in a minute. Again, health threats. I mean, the mission creep is off the charts of these people. These people need to be dealt some justice. This is insane. Your caught on camera committing treason. And I don't know about you, but I don't recognize this person. But I'm pretty sure we could figure out who it is. Just committing treason for health. Keep a safe WHO. Here we'll trade you all of our liberties. Just give us some security. This is absolutely disgusting. Better of days and weeks. COVID-19 demonstrates that we must do better in working with each other and communicating effectively when risks are detected. Failure in this regard is not acceptable. The United States of America looks forward to working with member states to move forward on this important issue, strengthening our collective ability to prevent, detect, and respond to future pandemics and making real progress toward the next one. The United States can make real progress towards the next one. The next pandemic, you're going to make real progress towards the next pandemic. I'm sure you are. These people have made their bed. They just handed over the control of our countries to some of the most guys. The WHO in the UN is a play toy of the billionaires. Of the Rockefellers, the Rothschild, especially the Gatesys, the super powerful Chinese. Remember, Ted Turner is the founder of the United Nations Foundation because he donated $1 billion. I mean, that's how this place works. And we're going to give away the United States sovereignty. In every other country, he's going to give away their sovereignty, bullshit. The people do not want this. This is happening in broad daylight. They're stealing everything. All your freedom, your country, your livelihoods, your free will. We need to put our feet down and say, fuck no. Ben's the WHO for its efforts to support the implementation of the IHR amidst the many challenges. Oh, she thanks them. Thank you for implementing this. Fuck this traitor. What's the punishment for treason? Can somebody put it in the comments? All right, get this in the context of what we just heard Tedros say. This is the CEO of Moderna talking about throwing away 30 million doses. Now, he says in the garbage, I'm going to cover tomorrow the huge amount of doses that are being thrown out. And they say they have to set them on fire in this other article. But the CEO of Moderna says in the garbage. So we'll talk about that in the next stream. Let's check out this clip. As Seth knows, we are now throwing those into the garbage. It's sad to say, I'm in the process of throwing 30 million doses into the garbage because nobody wants them. We have a big demand problem. We right now have governments. We try to contact not only Seth with doing great work with his team trying to get demand into the countries, but also we contacted through the Washington, the Embassy in Washington, every country and nobody wants to take them. And so the change we have now is it's a very different situation than we had two years ago. The point we had two years ago is there was no amount of capacity in the world. Zero. The situation is very different to them. Moderna has three billion doses of annual capacity. Pfizer has four billion doses at seven billion doses and the Chinese don't want the vaccines of a money. So if you just take the just the Chinese population out, we have more than a dose per person. And as we just discussed, the issue in many countries is people don't want vaccines. In the US people don't want vaccines. Around the world, we have a lot of people who don't want the vaccine as a problem safe and it's team out walking against. So we don't have a capacity issue around the planet. It is not true. It was true two years ago. It's not true today. Wow. There's so much in there. He's like, yeah, people don't want the vaccine, but this guy over here is working on that. So this is at the World Economic Forum, but just down the street in Geneva, Switzerland. Tedros is talking about how the countries have to commit to giving them a bunch of money and getting all the people or 70% of the people to take the vaccines. This is absurd. And worse, the clip of him apologizing for his product failing. Oh no, we won't get that, will we? All right, let's go to the free speech side of things also under attack in Switzerland. And what does that tell us that they meet in Switzerland? And we'll be talking about the heavy firepower security in just a second. These people are all about finding legal loopholes. Look at Gabby, for example. Gabby is set up as an independent organization in Switzerland. Like what the hell? They're just a separate being, completely sovereign. Like why would Gabby be so different than any other organization in the world? Why do these vaccines all have these loopholes? With indemnity. And weird organizations set up liability free. And then why do we hear the overlap between these billionaires pet projects? All these billionaires have the same pet projects. Vaccines and depopulation. We see it over and over again. The Rockefellers, the Gates is, Ted Turner, Warren Buffett, Saurus. Let's go to the next clip here. This is the E-Safety Commissioner, which is just a ridiculous title of Australia. Julie Grant, listen to this crap. We are finding ourselves in a place where we're, we have increasing polarization everywhere. And everything feels binary when it doesn't need to be. So I think we're going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, you know. From Wow, we need to look at a recalibration, a whole recalibration of the rights that are happening online. Allibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, you know. These people are disgusting. I mean, I feel bad for comic book writers because you can't invent a fictional character worse than these people. We need to solve this problem. We need to rise up against this. These people don't deserve anything. All they do is suck off of humanity. Like a fucking parasite, like a leech. They just leech onto us. We don't need them. We don't need these people. Freedom of spring, where we're, we have increasing polarization everywhere. And everything feels binary when it doesn't need to be. So I think we're going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, you know. From freedom of speech to the freedom to, you know, to be free from online violence. She's laughing. Is that really funny to you? And what is she been talking about? The freedom to be free from online violence? To be free from online violence. The freedom to be free from online violence. I can see why she'd want to censor her opposition because she's a bumbling idiot who's pushing a whole bunch of lies in the face of a great awakening of people sharing the truth. You know, the Soviet Union had a bunch of really crazy laws like this. And in fact, they're echoing a lot of the language that the Soviets used. Like they had a term anti-Soviet agitation. Now the new term is anti-science aggression. And then the Soviets also were huge human rights abusers in the realm of punitive psychiatry, which is where you say, oh, you're crazy, you're delusional. And you take away their civil rights and you throw them in prison. But one of the diagnoses that was most commonly used by the Soviets when they were locking people up or forcing treatment on them, a punitive psychiatry was sluggish schizophrenia or slow onset schizophrenia. And it has the most ridiculous definition. It's like the person could be so much more intelligent than you and so much more eloquent. But when you broach their favorite subject, their pathological obsession flares up wildly. So they just have topics that you're not allowed to talk about, especially not the government's fail-ins, for instance. That makes you a schizophrenic. So it's just this crazy totalitarian urge to censor and to punish people with really bad excuses. Like what was the problem that she was even talking about here? Let's listen back to the beginning of this video. We are finding ourselves in a place where we're we have increasing polarization everywhere. We have increasing polarization everywhere. That's the problem. I mean, I think she just showed her hand big time. That was a big tell and she's laughing because she's a liar. When she says there's increasing polarization, she's saying everybody's against us. So she's saying everybody's against us. But since we've pushed everybody onto the internet, let's just censor all of their speech and only allow people to say what we're going to allow them to say. So isn't it crazy? The same week right down the street, Geneva, Davis, we have two incredibly aggressive power grabs happening before our eyes. And they're actually publishing the videos of this. Can you imagine what they're saying behind closed doors? These people are garbage. These people need to find another species to become a part of. And everything feels binary when it doesn't need to be. So I think we're going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, you know, from freedom of speech to... It isn't an ironic that she messes up the word speech as she wants to slash the throats of people who make so much more sense and are so much more intelligent and are so much more caring and would be so much better for the collective. Oh, but not the real collective. We're talking about the collective, the Ika, the cult that we control. That's the collective that they're talking about. And speaking of, let's go to this. This is a really interesting tweet. Avya, Manny, on Twitter. He says, I just bumped into the New York Times deputy managing editor, our Bloomingstein in Davis. She's an invited guest and he asks her, how is the public supposed to trust their reporting? Check this clip out. Rebecca, how you doing from New York Times? Can I ask you a quick question, Asavie from Rebel News? How is the public meant to believe that the New York Times is here to actually ask the tough questions when you're here as an invited guest? How are people meant to rely on the mainstream media? We have, if you wouldn't mind, we just think... If you could give us, you know, thank you. You don't want to explain to people why we should trust the mainstream media? No, of course, no comment. There we go. They're invited guests. Remember, they won the Pulitzer Prize, I think in 2020 for their coverage of COVID-19. It's all a sham, folks. It's a monolith dressed up as separate institutions. Speaking of the New York Times, that's all this today. Look how ridiculous this is. This is an opinion piece by someone named Thomas Friedman for the New York Times. My lunch with President Biden. President Biden invited me for lunch at the White House last Monday, but it was off of the record, so I can't tell you anything he said. I can't tell you two things. What I ate and how I felt after, so I'll spare you and not read the rest of this, but that is insane. These people need to be toppled from their ivory towers. These people are sell-outs to the human race. All right, let's go to the craziness that is the security teams and the police in Davos. So, numerous people were detained, including Jack Pisobeck, and there's this super viral video going around from Sav Says showing them being harassed. And what's interesting is some people saw the badge. Oh, here's one more paramilitary sniper rifles in Davos. So, these people protect themselves with guns. These people care about their privacy. These people care about their rights. Just not yours. Okay, this is the craziest thing. There are these teams in Switzerland with these badges on that say, World Economic Forum Police. And look at their logo here. It's two rams, budding heads. And I see six six. I don't know about you six six, which of course the number of the beast. Also, the World Economic Forum logo very obviously is six six six six. If you look at it. But six six, you know what else is interesting. We covered this on a previous stream. The newly published Portugal Monkey Virus Genome was six point six times longer than the 29,000 base paired. COVID-19 Genome, six point six. And then there's these rocks down here, which I feel like I've seen somewhere before. But I can't place it. Here's a close-up. And here's a group of police officers walking by guns in hand. Collect some heavy-duty guns. Oh, here's one more about the free speech that's under attack on the internet. After they intentionally obviously heard of us all onto the internet, now they're going to take down our channels of communications. We shouldn't let them. We should fight against it with everything we've got. But it's obvious they've been telegraphing their next move for a while now, such as the UK's online safety bill, which would set up an internet regulator, which could force terms of service onto companies, which would force them onto their users. And then real soon, I bet the Christchurch call would be implemented, which basically calls for all internet service companies to deal with user uploads and have to check against the database called GIFCT, global internet forum for countering terrorism, which basically doesn't want people to share videos like the Christchurch video. But that's going to expand, of course. You can already see groups that are sponsored or funded by GIFCT talking about how conspiracy theories drive terrorism. I also saw a crazy bill. I forgot which one it was, probably online safety, but it could have been something else, or maybe it was clobacher in the US. There's been so many crazy bills, but there was one that talked about search engines. And I think the same one or maybe a different one, talking about social media sites and just putting the most ridiculous regulations on them, basically turning everything into YouTube. And then everything including YouTube and all these other sites would only go downhill from there together. But it's sad because YouTube's already such a bear and wasteland when it comes to certain types of content, which they completely erase off their sites and databases with AI thought police. But their definitions for the terms search engine and social media site were so broad. It's like if you type something in and it shows you something, that's a search engine. And it was like you can't promote hatred. Oh no, it was something even worse than that. It was like you can only do chronological. You can't use any algorithms to give people recommendations. And if you do, it has to account for hatred. So you don't give anything that causes people to hate protected groups. Something like that, but we're really going on a bad trajectory here. Really bad. And then here's another one to look up, e use digital services act. And then we've also seen some crazy stuff out of Canada. There was the cultural minister talking about everybody having to have a license to post onto the internet. Just craziness. Okay, speaking of craziness, here's another clip from Davos, the World Economic Forum. So these are the people that they're protecting with all those heavy machine guns. Here is Norwegian Finance CEO saying energy transition will create energy shortages. But the pain is worth it. So inflation energy shortages. Oh, but it's going to get us. Oh, but it's going to give us the solution that we want to the problem reaction solution. This is crazy. We need to accept that there will be some pain in the process. The pace that we need will will open up for missteps. It will open up for shortage of energy. It will create inflationary pressures. And maybe we need to start talking about that. That that pain is actually worth it. Because if we don't, there's no business case. There's no economy. There's no wealth there. But so far, I think we have been a little bit careful actually talking about the pain in the short term that is likely to come from from from from this change. What are they even talking about? Pain in the short term, but it's going to get better. Sounds like they're new normal that they keep talking about their depopulation agenda. Oh, yeah, it's going to suck for all those people we kill off. But the passing pain of a century can and will redeem millenniums from sufferings. Did I get it right? Nazis. That's mind conf. Adolf Hitler right there. 1925. But that's what she said. Pain is worth it. It's what Hitler said. The passing pain of a century can and will redeem millenniums from sufferings. This is basically what the modern day socialists are saying as well. Only after these measures are carried out can the medical struggle against the plague itself be carried through with any prospect of success. But here too, there must be no half measures. The greatest and most ruthless decisions will have to be made. It is a half measure to let incurably sick people steadily contaminate the remaining healthy ones. This is in keeping with the humanitarianism which to avoid hurting one individual lets a hundred others perish. The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective offspring is a demand of the clearest reason and if systematically executed represents the most humane act of mankind. It will spare millions of unfortunate un-deserved sufferings and consequently will lead to a rising improvement of health as a whole. The determination to proceed in this direction will oppose the dam to the further spread of venereal diseases. For if necessary, the incurably sick will be pitilously segregated, a barbaric measure for the unfortunate who is struck by it but a blessing to his fellow men and posterity. The passing pain of a century can and will redeem millenniums from sufferings. Sounds like those meetings going on in Switzerland this week in Davos and Geneva. Wow! Speaking of, let's go to Dr. Tadreus again. Crying, crying, crying because people are rising up and calling him out. Listen to this. Yes. Respond more effectively to the next disease ex or known pathogens. Unfortunately, there has been a small minority of groups making misleading statements. Small minority, they always have to say that they're liars. Why would anybody want the billionaires' health organization to take over sovereignty of the world? Show me one demographic besides like some insane brainwash liberals. But I don't think they're the majority. And purposefully distorting facts. I want to be crystal clear. WHS agenda is public, open and transparent. WHS stands strongly for individual rights. We passionately support everyone's right to health and we will do everything we can to ensure that. That is a joke. These people are a total joke. Did he hear what he just said? We support the individual's rights. We passionately support people's right to health. That's the one right he mentions. Which I don't remember seeing that in the bill of rights. Is that even possible to have a right to health? So you can just drink poison and you're healthy because you have a right to health. You can just cut off your arm and you can still be healthy because you have a right to health. No, the reason he picked out the right to health is because he's the World Health Organization dude. And that's their excuse. That's their justification for their totalitarianism dressed up as science, for their propaganda dressed up as science. This is their endgame folks. This is the best excuse they could come up with and they're going with it and it's up to us to wake everybody up. I think a lot of people are already awake, which is what's so interesting about this. But he says we strongly support people's right to health and we'll do everything we can to make sure people are healthy, wink, wink. And they'll ruin everything else and we'll all die because of what they'll do to try to make us healthy. As long as they're trying and they're doing a whole bunch of crazy stuff and saying they're trying to make us healthy. And then of course you have Washington Post running cover for this crab. Global Health Talks clouded by conspiracy theories about pandemic treaty. The unfounded theory accuses the World Health Organization of conspiring to take power from national governments. Give me a break that's exactly what they're doing. And look at who's behind the WHO. It's the super wealthy, the oligarchs, big shock. And they for the most part already control most of the nations. So this is just a reorganization of their power structure creating new layers of government and piling them one after another onto our shoulders until we collapse under the weight. So thanks everybody for watching. I hope you enjoyed the report. Check out rockfin.com slash Tim Truth. For more reports like this and if you want to sign up you get access to all the premiums, all the premium live streams and videos. So there's already a bunch in there that you'll get and then you'll get all the new ones as well. And also all the other channels premium content. There's a bunch of channels on rockfin really great channels. And they do a great job of supporting the content creators. So go to rockfin.com slash Tim Truth if you want to support the show. Thanks everybody for tuning in. I hope you have a great rest of your day.