Kalergi's Plan to Genocide Europeans, Hour 1 Brandon Martinez on Red Ice TV

Video Transcript:

This is where I swam for the second. Welcome back. Thank you for stopping by. I'm Henrik from Sweden. We are always so grateful to have you with us and that you want to spend some of your time with us as we learn about why things are the way they are. RedisQuestions.com is the website. Please take a look if you're new to the program. We have a lot of material there for you. We have a return visit from Brandon Martinez today from Non-Aligned Media. He's an independent writer and journalist from Canada who specializes in foreign policy issues, international affairs and 20th and 21st century history. For years he has written on Zionism, Israel Palestine, American and Canadian foreign policy, war, terrorism and deception in the media and politics. For this program we are going to look at last year's migration invasion and put that into perspective and discuss why it's happening, who's behind it and who is benefiting from it. We are later in the program going to tie all of this together with the developments in Syria and look at the bigger geopolitical situation that is causing all of these pieces to fall in place the way they have. Stay tuned. Welcome back Brandon. Thank you so much for coming back again. I was a pleasure speaking with you. Excellent. Have you back? It's great to be here. Thanks for having me again. You bet. Well, we received some good email last time you were on talking about the ISIS conspiracy. I've been pretty bad I guess at keeping up with the geopolitical developments in Syria and now also how Russia, Turkey and of course the US-Israeli alliance have benefited from what is happening in the Middle East right now. Really, I've been just so busy trying to deal with the horrifying effects of this in Europe. But obviously we do have a route to this problem but everything is piggybacked on and I think that you have some good insight on this that we definitely want to get into and talk more about here later. But before we discuss that, tell us a bit about your book, your latest book, Grand Deceptions. Is that released yet? Yeah, that's actually the first book I ever published. It was put out in October of 2014 in the first edition and it's basically a treaty on Zionism. So it's sort of a compact study and overview and summary of a lot of the evidence of Zionist entry in the 20th and 21st centuries. So what I've done now is I'm putting out a second edition. So I've written two new chapters, brand new content, which amounts to about 60 new pages. So the book's quite short, it's like 143 pages. The first edition and now with the updates, it's over well over 200 pages, 600 pages, 100 footnotes. So the new content deals specifically with the issue of multiculturalism, the Frankfurt School Cultural Marxism, the clergy plan, and then obviously the backstory with that and the main players involved in fomenting those things and pushing them forward into the 21st century. So that's the first new chapter, the second new chapter. And I kind of do a broad overview of an up-to-date overview of the recent developments in the Middle East, tying in the Oded, you know, plan with what happened to Cedon and Libya and Syria in terms of the internal artificial manufacture uprisings there, culminating in everything we're seeing today with ISIS and the insurgencies that have besieged these countries. And I also detail what they have in store for Iran down the line. So I cover a lot of the, I tie in a lot of the Zionist intrigues and the geopolitical manifestos that have been put out recently, like the Brookings Institute put out this report called Witch Path to Persia, which is basically a blueprint for regime change in Iran, where they literally listed five or six ways tactics that they're looking to use to bring about an overthrow of the Iranian government. They detailed economic sanctions, an outright invasion, a military coup, they detailed sort of backing terrorists and insurgents against Iran or just emboldening the minority factions in Iran as sectarian gamut to break up the country and incite them to revolt. So these are strategies that they've used in Syria and Libya, in Iraq and Afghanistan, throughout this entire Zionist neocon conspiracy beginning with the 9-11 attacks, which I detail throughout the book, most of the book for six chapters deals with the Zionist origins of the war on terror and neoconservatism as a movement. It's entirely a Jewish Zionist movement geared towards strengthening Israel, creating a Zionist imperium in the Middle East, using the West and the United States in particular as a bulwark against the enemies of Israel through and manufacturing all of this through manipulation, through meat-dee propaganda and through primarily false flag terrorism, staging terrorism in order to hoodwink their ostensible allies quote-unquote into fighting wars against their enemies and disorienting their enemies as well. And I detail some of the historical false flag operations of the Israeli state going back to the King David Hotel bombing in 46 of the Levant affair of the USS Liberty. I also cover some lesser known false flags like the one in Libya in 1986, which is called Operation Trojan. There was a bombing in Germany that same year that was blamed on Libya is actually the Masad CIA that did it. And that framed Germany or framed Libya. There was another one in Africa. There's these embassy bombings that nobody really talks about because they kind of was scared and they happened in 1998. I found some very intriguing evidence that Israel was linked to those. And of course, I have a big, big chapter on 9-11, the beneficiaries of it and Israeli intelligence involvement in that as the new Pearl Harbor that the Neal cons have been yearning for and calling for as their passes belly to instigate, initiate this clash of civilizations that they've been pontificating about and all their propaganda outlets going back to 1979 with the Jonathan Institute conference in Israel where the war on terror was actually conceived by Benjamin Netanyahu. And he's the number one guy who's been pushing it ever since. Every time there's a quote-unquote terrorist attack in the West, Netanyahu is on the pulpit, screaming and yelling about how there needs to be more mobilization against the enemies of Israel. He's just a macchibellian schemer. So the book is basically an intense summary of all those. It's quite short and concise, which is a lot of the good feedback I got was to the effect that it is so concise and so potent and putting together a lot of good evidence. For these things and in a concise way, that's one of my strengths is just summarizing information for average people who don't really know about this information and this is just a good primer for them to get their feet white so to speak. Yeah, it's a great asset. We need more material like that, of course, because people don't have the time. The time is, in some cases, they don't know where to turn to kind of wait through all of this material and stuff. So that's an excellent resource to have. Now, I'd love to hear some more about Iran later. I think there's a really interesting development of what's happening there. But we spoke in, was April 2015, almost a year ago, and a lot of things have happened since that time. Obviously, the so-called migrant crisis have really ramped up really over the summer there. So a few months after we spoke, tell us about the first chapter because obviously this kind of connects with this a bit about both Jewish supremacy, but also the multicultural experiment, which is that is a tenent part of what we're seeing right now. Why did you want to add this so early in the book as a second edition of the book? Why is this so important to you? Well, the thing is, what we're seeing today is a great polarization on two sides of this. So I've been very focused in the past year and a half, past two years, focusing on the misdeeds of Western governments in their form of policy and deconstructing this whole Zionist, neo-conservative plan to reorder and reconfigure the Middle East and they're committing some of the worst crimes of the 21st century have been perpetrated by these Western governments. And I've been on top of all that stuff. But what I'm noticing now is there's this kind of disconnect on both sides of this argument about migrants and immigration and multiculturalism. I have a lot of readers on my website, not on my media who are, I guess, would you call more kind of leftist and Zionist who are very in tune to that whole angle to things, but they kind of neglect and shirk the multiculturalism issue and some of the intrigues behind mass immigration cultural Marxism, the Frankfurt School. They don't really want to look into that because not that they're hiding those things, it doesn't really fit with their mindset because they're so focused on exposing the crimes of the West at the moment, right? So there tends to be an ignorance on that end of those things, but there's also an ignorance on the other end where it's people who are focused entirely on deconstructing this whole mass immigration multiculturalism issue where they're kind of giving wrong-headed analysis of foreign policy or they're just shirking it entirely and not talking about it or just denying it completely. And actually in some cases I've seen people who call themselves alt-right or new-right or whatever actually defend some of these criminal foreign policies. So there seems to be an infiltration or subversion of both ends where people are being told to talk about one thing and not the other, right? Whereas I'm trying to kind of meld the two things together, look at all of the information and all of the victims of globalism and give them both their fair hearing, right? Right. And bring the analysis to a synthesis where I'm actually describing the entire phenomenon and all of the agendas behind it. So that was the evidence behind the chapter and I've written a few articles to that effect prior to putting out the second edition. One of them was the article called, is the migrant crisis part of a Zionist plot against white Europeans? And the thing is basically you cannot please everybody in this movement, right? No. So I will have people who really respect my work on the Middle East and deconstructing Zionism and the foreign policy issue and false like terrorism. But then they'll kind of give me feedback when I delve into some of this other stuff and they'll say I've like betrayed the cause or something and you know you call me a white supremacist or whatever because I don't support mass immigration, which is itself a globalist, a tenet of globalism itself. Of course. Yeah. A lot of these people on either end of these things, they're just shirking major aspects to what's going on and they're building up like these two opposing camps where people are fighting each other and are very pissed off at each other based on some of their analysis. So I just, you know, I don't really care if people are upset about what I'm writing. Are the facts correct? That's my only concern. Are the issues that I'm addressing real issues and do the effect people and that's basically what I've been trying to do. So with multiculturalism and Zionism, these are really kind of a two headed hydra. You can't really divorce one from the other. You know, Zionism is intent not just on establishing a Jewish state for Jews around the world in Palestine, which they've done through blackmail and scheming and all of this Machiavillian strategizing that they've been engaged in, but they're simultaneously attempting to weaken everybody else. So in the Middle East, what are they doing? Well, they're breaking down their surrounding countries as per the Oedid, you know, in plan, as per sectarian fault lines because that weakens them. But at the same time, they also have an agenda to weaken their other perceived enemies. I mean, these aren't even real enemies. These people are paranoid so they view everybody as an enemy. But in the West, the majority are whites, Christians. So for century, they've been scheming and plotting to weaken us in the West and they've done that through insigating wars like they do in the Middle East, but they've also done at least post-1945. They've been really ramping up this agenda to push mass immigration, multiculturalism because this produces an environment that is conducive to their upward mobility or their just domination. So when there's a majority group out there that they view as a threat to their, it's really a threat to their hegemony, they might act as if this is just about stamping out anti-Semitism, but that's not really the issue. They're not entirely concerned with anti-Semitism and so far as anti-Semitism is just a reaction to what they're doing. They're concerned with domination. It's not just about eliminating threats. It's about control. It's about power in the Middle East. Because ultimately that is eliminating the threat, right? If they can, because I hear a lot of people on the left say, for example, when you begin to talk about multiculturalism and immigration and stuff, they have an idea that, oh, you're don't focus on the differences. You're dividing and conquering us. You're usually here. It's like, well, the bringing in of immigration is designed to divide and conquer us, right? To have a group homogenous and unified and pulling in the same direction, much like the Jewish community, right? That they manage to despite their low numbers when they work ethnically, when they orient themselves ethnically, ethnically, they can get a tremendous amount of done for their own people. Obviously, any other group that would do this move in the same direction, that would undermine their very ability to dominate and to conquer, as you say. Right. Right. Their activism is aimed at exploiting divisions and exacerbating those divisions and creating new divisions through a promotion of identity politics, things like feminism, transgenderism, these new phenomenon that have sprung out of the new left, what can be traced back to cultural Marxism, which is a byproduct of the Frankfurt School, which originated in Germany in 1923, was established by a guy named Karl Grunzberg, who was a Jewish Marxist professor. It was financed by a Jewish millionaire named Felix Wilde. Essentially, what the Frankfurt School was all about was sort of deconstructing the authoritarian personality of Western civilization or Western men, specifically. It doesn't entirely originate as like a post-World War II movement because it was established before World War II prior to Hitler coming to power. They'd already been formulating these doctrines prior to this. It's not something that sprung as a reaction to Hitler. It was actually pre-Hitler. Then they just used Hitler as their model bad guy to deconstruct. Most of these, almost all of the intellectuals, forebears of cultural Marxism in the Frankfurt School, are Jewish. The names here are Theodore Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Herbert Mercuse, Friedrich Pollock, Eric Fromm, Otto Kurtschimer, Leo Lohwenthal, Franz Newman. Go down the list. All of them are Jewish. All of them are very strongly identifying Jews and Zionists. Their agenda is quite obvious. It is to break down the cultural fabric of Western societies so that they do not lead into something that could resemble quote-unquote fascism, or which is just a euphemism at this point for kind of Gentile nationalism. They're afraid of nationalism for all their peoples. They're the ones who stamped out nationalism for Palestinians. They stifle the self-determination of Palestinians. They carpet bomb them and drone bomb them and use white phosphorus and then demonize them in the media. They are against nationalism for all Gentiles, white or non-white, doesn't matter. Whoever they view as a competitor, but then they're all for nationalism for themselves because that makes them strong. That makes builds up their quote-unquote in-group loyalty. They're all about breaking that down for other groups because it's part of their group evolutionary strategy or whatever to advance themselves, advance their power, advance their interests. Not all Jews are involved in the Frankfort School. Obviously not. These are a select group of very active and extremely paranoid and gets a frenic, I would say, Jewish elites that have committed themselves to this movement, which infiltrated a lot of the universities in the United States, post-World War II. Hitler actually kicked them out of Germany. They brought the way into Columbia University and other places in the US. That became the hub, the center of cultural Marxist activity in the US. All these other movements started to spring from that, like the new left and that whole sexual revolution and everything involved with that. I love to just add something there. I was actually not too long ago. I visited Columbia University. I think they came over to New York in 1935 after the well-vesting institute of social research that moved, obviously, 33 when Hitler came to power, as he said. It was amazing to just walk around on the grounds there to see how both the people, but also the power of the architecture, the dominance of just those structures that the buildings that were on the site. It was amazing to just realize how this powerful, at the time elite school, have really been turned into a mechanism of this cultural Marxism. When at some point the school represented really the high point, I'd say, to a certain extent, of Western civilization. You had statues and you had inscriptions all over the school with a focus on wisdom and philosophy and study and all this stuff. It was just amazing to see also how few white people that were at the school anymore. It was almost that they were completely replaced. Sure, I was just there for one day, but what I saw, there was hardly any white people left in the school anymore. It's remarkable the way they managed to overturn and institution like this very elite Gentile school and to make it and turn it into what it is today. Right. And I think that also applies to most of the major Ivy League schools, Harvard, Princeton, all these schools have been hijacked and they're now just basically havin' to either cultural Marxism or they also use those schools to recruit dirtbags for the CIA and other elite organizations. Now, two of the main guys here that were involved with the Frank Roussville were Theror Adorno and Max Horkheimer. These are the intellectual godfathers of the movement and they wrote all the books, basically all the literature that was used as the foundation for cultural Marxism. The one main book is called the authoritarian personality, right? And even the Wikipedia page for this book identifies Adorno as his motivation for writing the book as quote, the Holocaust, right? So his, the study that he put out, this book was produced by this group called Studies and Prejudice, which was sponsored as Wikipedia admits by the American Jewish Committee's Department of Scientific Research. So the motivations and the impetus, it's not even as if they're trying to hide it. Perhaps they do try to hide it in some ways, but in other ways they don't. He explicitly attempts in the book to delegitimize what he calls fascist or anti-Semitic tendencies in Western male psyche, right? So he also continued on that theme in other essays like in 1947, there was a erotinistic called Wagner Nietzchen Hitler in 1950s, got an essay called 40 in theory in the pattern of fascist propaganda. And it's amazing because they're the ones who are the experts in propaganda and Edward Bernays and all these guys, these were mostly Jews and they're the ones leading at the propaganda efforts today in every possible theater, whether it's neo-conservatism or cultural Marxism, or Zionism or war-mongering in the Middle East. So they're the champions of propaganda and deconstructing other people and pointing at the flaws in other people, which they're doing today against Muslims because they're the targets in the Middle East. So the neo-cons are basically cultural Marxists as well. They just do it in a phony conservative cloak, but their main embodies and their main attack is deconstructing Islamic cultures, right? So they're mean to gays and they're mean to women. These are things that they're pushing here too with feminism and gay rights and transgenerism. These are all things that are designed to break down cultures, traditional cultures, right? To deconstruct these cultures, to weaken them and elevate the weakest elements in society and make them the actual rulers, right? So the weakest elements being minorities or homosexuals or women, now they're becoming the thought leaders. They're becoming the politicians who are running the government. They're becoming the media moguls now. They're the thought leaders and they're doing that to the Muslim world. They're doing that to the Western world. They're doing that to anyone that they view as an impediment to their agenda. I go into, there's a long section in that chapter, the new chapter on the clergy plan, right? The clergy plan for Europe, when people talk about the white genocide phenomenon, it's not necessarily when people think of genocide, they think of violent killing, right? But it's not necessarily the case. It doesn't have to be violent. It can be through immigration. It can be through intermixing, right? Because genocide, it simply means destroying the genes, right? So if it's planned, right? As long as it's a concerted effort by someone to replace the group or to transfer the children of them or I mean, certainly an elementary level of targeting them with violence as well, but it's like a long term ethnic cleansing kind of thing. And that is by definition genocide. And it says in whole or in part, right? So that is what is happening. It's happening in two places. It's happening in the Middle East more directly, more physically through bombing and carpet bombing and destruction. That's a more direct approach that they've taken to the Middle East because those are the direct enemies of Israel, physical enemies. We're in the West, it's more of a cultural war. It's more of a psychological war. And it's also being waged through mass immigration and propaganda that's used to promote, quote, unquote, diversity or race, mixing or whatever. These are all things that are acting simultaneously and designed to produce the effect of dissolution of the ethnic homogeneity. As Peter Sutherland, the globalist, actually came out directly and said, we want to undermine the national homogeneity of European countries, directly stating the agenda of the goal. So when I'm pointing to evidence like that, I'm not a white supremacist for pointing that out. He's the one who said that it's his goal to destroy Europe. It's just a fact and we should oppose it because it's a destructive and evil plan. Just as we oppose these evil wars that are also destructive and evil. Well, it shows, Brandon, I think the tremendous success and I think it kind of a foundational work in terms of propaganda that has been laid when it comes to, as you say, you can point out this plan and say, you know, I'm not saying it, they are, look at what this is doing. But even that as a recognition is considered to be, you know, quote, white supremacist, right? So meaning that even you in defense of your own group, if you're white, is seen as a crime really. It's seen as something which is so immoral, so reprehensible that if you attach yourself to that, you are, you know, you're belonging to this group that they have been programming us for such a long time about fascists or anybody who is white just looking after your own interest. I find it remarkable how, you know, people can see that. They can even be fairly tuned into conspiracy or to the geopolitical game or even to, as you said, what they are doing in Palestine and whatnot. But as soon as you flip the coin and show that other side of it, they want nothing to do with it, which I think indicates to me that they're victims of this same groups propaganda that we've been talking about. Right. It's been very stigmatized deliberately. So, and there's been massive money that's been poured into doing that into promoting these memes and narratives that delegitimize basically only the self-determination of Europeans and not of any other group. So one of the critiques I'd have of people who are very anti-imperialist and I am as well and I would consider myself a fellow traveler in that respect. But they will champion all of the self-determinations of all of the third world peoples, right? So, you know, Palestinians, they have a right to self-determination. Everybody in the global south has a right to self-determination, but not whites. Right. But this is part of this like culture marks this narrative that only whites can't look out for their own or I can't have a nation, can't be homogenous. Everybody else can. India is, you know, like 90% Indian, China, 90% Chinese, Japan, 95% Japanese, North and South Korea, like 98% Korean. Africa is mostly African. I mean, there's some white people there, I guess, in South Africa. But all of these peoples are able to have their countries, right? Yeah. Yeah, there's definitely, there's been interference and oppression and globalism has destroyed a lot of those countries as well, but they're also destroying Europe too. It's not like Europe is like no side of the crosshairs of globalism. Well, I'd say, I'd say, Brian, I'm sorry to interrupt, but I'd say that in some regard, some of the European countries were actually targeted of this first, right? They became the vehicle and the mechanism partially, of course, because of our ability, technologically, to extend ourselves the way we did into other countries and thereby extending our influence and our politics, financial issues and whatnot. But the overtaking of various European nations in terms of the elite we're talking about here, that goes way back and I'd say that happened in Europe before many other places, at least in the modern times. Right. There's a divide and conquer gambit in the Middle East, spearheaded by Zionist, but there was also a divide and conquer gambit in Europe going back to the First World War, the Second World War, the 30 years war. Yeah. Plenty of examples where Europeans have also been used and oftentimes hoodwinked and used as the vehicles or the agents or the foot soldiers of Zionism and globalism in various wars. There's definitely a case we made that these European countries are the leading vessels, or at least the United States now, as a leading vessel facilitating the aims of Zionism, no question about it. But the people in the country, the average people, the working class people, didn't come up with these things. They're just, you know, they didn't benefit from it either, Medicaid. Look at Britain, for example, you hear that all the time, right? There's like a tremendous underclass in underclass in Britain that it's like, there's old ladies that are freezing to death, you know? And despite that, somehow the advantages and the white privilege of colonialism is projected upon them, which is utterly nonsensical, ridiculous. Well, one of the first victims of colonialism were Irish people that were actually taken to the New World as indentured, quote unquote, indentured servants as slaves. So there are average people are also used in these gambits. It's always just a tiny little elite crust that benefits from whether it's imperialism today or colonialism of yesterday year. But even if these people did benefit, are there descendants also guilty? Is there such a thing as generational guilt? I mean, if your father is a murderer, it doesn't make you a murderer, right? We wouldn't apply this on a personal level. But it somehow applied to entire races, which is very strange. So I don't believe in collective guilt, okay? Even if these countries were the most evil in the world, I mean, we can point to examples of other groups committing similar acts throughout history that doesn't justify them being destroyed today. We can all have our own spaces, our own areas and preserve our history and culture and everything cannot be at war with each other and base live in peace. But the globalists in the Zionists don't want that. So they're forcing these things on to us. They're putting us into these opposing camps, pushing us against each other, creating this destabilization everywhere, the Middle East and in Europe. And it's all part of this master plan, which traces back to Richard von Kudnoff, Colergy, who is the founder of the pan Europa, the semi-noll text, the pan Europa book. In 1923. And he was a guy that was the son of an Austrian diplomat and a Japanese mother. And he was basically the frontman for the dissolution of Europe as we know it today. And he actually pontificated this and articulated this in many of his texts and speeches. And he promoted openly the mixing of all the different races together to produce what he called a Eurasian Negroid race. So that's Europeans, Asians, Negroid, all into one globalist slave race with no culture, with no roots, no attachments. And this would be ruled over according to Colergy, according to his own words. I didn't make this up. He said to the spiritual nobility who he identified as Jews, and he actually said in one of his books that Jews represented a brain aristocracy that they have a superiority of spirit that they will lead this new government in Europe over this slave race with no culture and no attachments. And he described them as a spiritual nobility. So he was a Jewish supremacist. So Jews would maintain their very exclusive as tribalist culture and keep their group pure because they're racist. They want to ban inner marriage in Israel and they're against mixing for their group, but then they're promoting it for all the other groups. So what's the end goal? It's the end game here. Well, we're all weak and divided and we're acculturated and they are as strong and powerful as they be as united and cohesive as they could possibly be. And they'll be the overseers of this new Europe, the United States of Europe. And one of the articles I found here, which I included an excerpt from was from the Jewish telegraphic agency from 1926. And it was reporting on Kalyrgi's conference that he had this at this year. And the article is called Jews participate in pan-Europe congress sessions in Vienna. And it said, quote, to several Jewish European leaders took a prominent part in the first pan-European congress, which opened here on Sunday when the movement to establish the United States of Europe modeled after the United States of America took definite shape. It says many individual European Jews are furthering the pan-European movement by giving it financial support. And it named a few of them, Leon Bloom, Luziati, George Brandes, Harry Warburg. And it said, Kudinov Klergi is married to Ida Roland at Jewish, which it says in here. And then it said, quoted him as saying that the creation of a United States of Europe would be beneficial to the Jews as it would eliminate racial hatred and economic rivalry. In other words, it would eliminate any opposition to Jews and would elevate them to an economic overclass. It's just so brazen. And he was actually admitted in his autobiography that Max Warburg was the chief financier of his movement, the German Jewish banker, whose brother Paul Warburg became the head of the Federal Reserve Bank in the United States or the founder of it. And also he was friends with Lui Baron von Rothschild. So it was the head of the Austrian branch of the Rothschild family. And he was also backed by the Freemasonic movement. He was a Freemason himself. Freemasonry is basically Judaism for Gentiles. So he got tremendous, tremendous support from the leadership of the Jewish financial elite and the Masonic elite. And then he actually was, he encountered a similar fate as the Frankfurt School and that he was actually chased out of Europe by Hitler. And he took root in the United States, continued to promote his pan-European project. So he would kind of talk in these universalist terms where he would say, oh, we need a united Europe to prevent wars, right? Sort of the narrative that they advocate for a global government. They say, oh, well, if there's a global government, there will be no more wars, right? So let's just sacrifice sovereignty in the name of some greater good. So these are the kind of tricks and deceptive lingo that's thrown out there to convince us to get on board with these globalist plans, right? It's remarkable. And actually much of his repulsions too have actually come into fruition. There's still a kind of a colorgy price that's actually handed out to politicians that have been obviously instrumental in bringing into fruition, you know, the tenants that he was considering at the time. And symbolic things such as, for example, suggesting the ode to joy as the national anthem of Europe of sorts, he suggested initially the flag, the 12 stars, for example, they had a little bit of a different symbol for the European, the pan-European movement. It was basically a red kind of a temple or cross within a sun or something, a yellow circle, but this transformed later on. So it's not like he was a small player at the time and certainly afterwards a lot of Europeans so-called the founding fathers have paid tribute, if you will, to him and to his ideas. So I definitely think we're right when we're saying that he kind of laid the groundwork ideologically speaking for what later developed into Europe. Right. The European Union is very much founded upon his principles that he laid out in his text and he advocated openly and promoted and all of their underlying doctrines basically follow along with what he was saying. I mean, he was advocating for the mixing of all the different races and what do we see happening? Well, the European Union is leading the effort to bring in masses, masses of foreign people into Europe. And then there's also a speech given by Nicholas Zarkozy in 2008 where he advocated racial interbreeding and he said that this would be forced upon people and if they didn't want it or didn't go along with it, that more coercive measures would be used to enforce that this happened. So what we see is the entire European elite are color guillights. They're following the color guillight and go to Merkel, David Cameron, this phony rhetoric they put out here that multiculturalism is a failure. They put that out in around 2008 or something. They all simultaneously said that they only put that out there to pacify people to make it look like they're not actually behind this, that they're not actually supporting this. All of those three politicians have led the effort to inundate their countries with mass immigration. I mean, David Cameron, 330,000 immigrants have been coming in every year annually into Britain under David Cameron's neoconservative government. Zarkozy, the same thing, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of immigrants every year coming into France. Like 20% of the actual population of France is foreign in ethnicity. Germany, Merkel is the one who opened the floodgates to a million refugees. So they're lying when they're saying they're against multiculturalism or that it's a failure. Really that when it's kind of confusing when people hear multiculturalism, it's not necessarily what they want. They want a inner bread, a culture-rated mass who have no culture. So it's not going to be culture sitting side by side. It's going to be no culture. It's going to be the globalist slave popular culture of consumerism. That's what they want. So Islamic cultures are also an impediment to that, which is why they're promoting cultural Marxism in the Islamic world as well. They're promoting these so-called reformists that are trying to liberalize the religion because this will allow feminism and homosexual rights and so forth. Now I think Islam basically takes that cultural conservatism too far, I would say. They're too far on the one end, but then the cultural Marxists are way too far on the other end. So I think that the best ideal scenario would be somewhere in the middle that allows a lot of the freedoms that we have in the West, but doesn't elevate like a gaze and minorities and transgenders and all this stuff into positions of power or elevate them into this like sacrosync status that they have now under cultural Marxism. That is an impediment to globalism as well. So they want to break down all traditional cultures, whether it's Arab, Islamic cultures or Hindu culture in India or other cultures. They want to break down all these things as they're all an impediment to globalism, but at the same time, I think it's really only the white ethnic groups that are being specifically targeted for a genocidal end game, right? Because African populations are exploding. The Indian population is exploding. The Chinese had to do a one child policy because they're having too much, too many kids, too much population. So it's really only the white ethnic group that is declining in number and is being facilitated every step of the way by these color gui leaders that are in power in Europe. One of the guys who actually spoke out about this was Nick Griffin, who was the head of the DNP and he actually stood up in the European Parliament and called out this entire thing. He talked about callergy. He says an elite cabal of leftist capitalists and Zionists, supremacists are the architects of ethno side in Europe that they're promoting immigration and miscegenation with a deliberate aim of breeding a set of existence in our own homelands. He said this is a genetic modification industry and that they come up with various excuses like temporary guest workers, multiracial experiment, refugees, etc. These are pretexts that are used to justify the mass immigration. So you'll notice today they talk about a declining population. We need to replace this with other people, right? Well, why do you have to do that? It's because your population isn't growing exponentially. You have to bring more people in. Why is that the case? Right. I understand. No, it's ridiculous. What do you say? I mean, this is what's happening. No doubt. But obviously what they are seeking at the end goal to be is obviously not something that's coming into fruition right now. This is actually working in the opposite direction. This is creating a tremendous divide, not only of course between the immigrant groups and the native European people, but it's also, of course, dividing between the native people who are pro-immigration or anti-immigration who over this question actually are divided, right? They have families, relationships, things like that are actually breaking apart because some people are not liking it and others are and this is leading to chaos in that regard. But my point is why are they seeking to bring in not only Muslims, there's others too, but millions of non-Europeans into Europe that are very kind of, I think, once they get to Europe, they become very hardened in their own religion and cultural association. In many cases, they cling on to it even more than someone in, for example, the country they came from would do for obvious reasons, right? They feel ostracized. They might feel that they don't belong, etc. But this is causing tremendous strife. It's surely at this point isn't leading very few instances, I think, to the mixing, this interbreeding that the Calergy and this other elite are hoping for. Right. So how are they seeking to use this, do you think? The hardened relationships between these groups to, to at the end of it eventually bring it to that point when all of Europeans say, you know, what, oh my God, we've got to stop these horrible violence and everything. It's just kind of blend and merge together so that, again, we will lead to peace or something or how do you think they're hoping this to play out? Well, I think they're always adapting, right, to different situations to the crises that they've created, the manufactured crisis that they've facilitated on purpose. And one of the reasons that they're bringing in masses of particular Muslim Middle Eastern writers, one, it's basically what they've done is it's a consequence. They've mobilized the consequences of their imperial wars, right. So they've done this audit, you know, in plan, fracturing these countries, promoting sectarianism, they've invaded a few of the countries. In other cases, they've covertly sponsored and spawned insurgencies and fed those insurgencies with weapons and money. And they've caused all these refugees and displaced people in certain areas. And they're basically weaponizing those same people that they are responsible for uprooting and using them to facilitate this other agenda in Europe and they're pushing them into Europe. They don't have to do that. I mean, these migrants were sitting in Turkey and Jordan for a few years from around 2012 to 2015. They were in refugee camps in Turkey, but then all of the sudden they were pushed into Europe. That was not an accident. That was deliberate. And you know, one of the outcomes of this is further polarization between the West and the Islamic world, which of course plays into the hands of the new conservatives in the Zionists who have always been trying to promote this idea about a clash of civilizations and a confrontation that is largely manufactured. Or maybe there's some organic elements to it historically. But in terms of today's context, it is almost entirely manufactured through false-like terrorism engineered wars and now engineered mass migration that they are promoting and facilitating as George Soros said, he declared that a million refugees need to be accepted into the EU every year. And then his organizations are basically financing it and promoting it. And Peter Sutherland has declared that Europe needs to literally open its borders completely to anyone who wants to come into Europe. And what this does is since these migrants are majority Muslim, the nationalist backlash to that is being completely hijacked by Zionists and Neocons and other elements that have actually foreseen that this would happen and put their agents in place in order to steer the descent. So we have groups like the English, Defensely and Peggyda and Gert Wilders and others who are overtly Zioncons. They wave Israeli flags at their parades, at their protests. They're openly pro-Israel. They support neo-conservative foreign policies of intervention and war in the Islamic world. They focus all of their attention entirely 100% of the time on Islam. They have nothing else to say about any other issue and that is the desired goal of these groups. And Nick Griffin actually gave a good anecdote at his speech. He said in 2007, neo-con Jews tried to bribe the BMP, him and the BMP and they told him, it was quite simple. They said, don't talk about Zionism. Don't talk about Israel. Don't talk about the origins of the European Union, who's behind mass immigration, who's promoting this. Only talk about Islam. Only Bash Islam because it benefits Israel's enemies or now our enemies. We're seeing the world through their spectacles. So this has clearly been sort of like a game theory gambit where they've sort of weighed all the options of this and they decided moving specifically Muslims into Europe will increase this polarization between West and East between Christianity and Islam. And this of course, who benefits from this while Israel rises out of the chaos of this engineer manufactured confrontation as the leading state in the world. And you can go on the internet and look up Benjamin Ezanyahu. He says Israel must become the leading power. Literally. He says Israel must become the leading state in the world that will literally trump even all the big Western powers at the end of this. Now there's a great polarization that's happening. So basically we're being asked to either be like 100% for refugees or 100% against to be 100% against Islam or 100% for it. So there's always these dialectical thing going on. It's either you're in this two extreme camps, either in one or the other. They're not allowing any room for a middle ground. So in the case of mass immigration of Muslims, obviously this isn't desirable in any kind of sensible way that you have a different people with a different religion and a different culture moving in in mass numbers. This is just isn't desirable whether it's Muslims or Hindus or Africans or whatever. I mean, the religion doesn't really matter. It's even if they were all atheists, it would still be undesirable. Right. Just based on the ethnic and cultural differences, just based on the fact that European countries cannot maintain their culture and civilization if there's a mass influx of other people, regardless of who they are. Right. Regardless of their religion. So they're trying to steer that fact and put it entirely into just attacking Islam. Obviously there's negative things about Islam. There's negative things about Christianity and obviously Judaism and all religion. But the point is that they're really trying to get these groups to be pro pro war in a sense and pro Israel. And well, it paints them into a corner, Brad. Those are an exact right? That's what it's designed to do. So some of these groups that are rising now to kind of suck up the discontent, the understandable discontent of the native European population, they seem to frown on Islam because, you know, as you said, they think it's too conservative. Just I mean, it's sure. There's extremist element within it, even excluding the false flag issue. There's plenty of, as we I think we discussed this last time too, there's plenty of violence and rape that is occurring and these things are actually not lifted forward in the media that you would think it would be if they were seeking to use that to slam Islam, right? There's almost a, these, some of these issues, they put the lid on, they try to cover it up. We even have code 291 in Sweden where the police is actively, if a crime has been committed by a migrant or immigrant, whatever, then they actually actively are trying to cover it up not to bring attention to it because it will further cause, you know, rifts and discontent, right? So they're very picky in choosing terms of what they pick. But my point is these groups that are rising now, it seems that basically they are, they are liberalized Westerners, right? They have the objection to the fact that many Islamists are, they're hard on the, you know, promotion of homosexuals or whatever, right? They, they want those Western values, which have made us progressive and soft and they have, they, they stand in the way of it. There was this one video of the pagoda meetings in UK with Tommy Robinson and Paul Weston that the speeches they made on a kind of the relaunch of pagoda, which was quite interesting to watch, actually, and they were tremendously, you know, friendly, if you will, to multiculturalism. They were talking about how all these people are coming to the UK. There was this old generally was something like some paratrooper or something, I think, old guy who participated in the second world war, I believe. And he was like talking about how wonderful it was with this multiculturalism in the UK and how we all have benefited from it. But it, there's just this one group that doesn't want to adapt and fit in basically. And that was the Islamists, right? So it's very, in my view, very antithetical to this idea that it's actually the destruction of the homogeneity of the population that is the problem, not whether they come attached with one religion or another, sure, the effects of it might be more extreme to that extent and the conflicts that the cultural collision, if you will, is more noticeable if it's Islam versus, let's say, a more atheist or progressive lefty or something in the West, right? But this is what they're seeking to do, right? They're seeking to say that everything is fine. It's just these horrible Muslims that refuse to fit in because they're just too conservative for the West, right? Right. Yeah, I mean, in England, I think one of the main immigrant groups is Afro-Caribbean's, right? They're not Muslims. But these people are fine with these kind of mass immigration coming from other parts of the world that aren't Islamic because Islamic culture and just political thought is anti-Zionist, is antithetical to cultural Marxism is probably the most conservative religion in the world and there are certain elements within it that go way too far like the Wahhabi-Sahleifists who are the main group that, whenever these Neokhans critique Islam, that they're actually talking about Wahhabi-S, but then they're applying that to the entire religion. I mean, women are pretty liberated in countries like Iran. I mean, they hold public office. There's political posts specifically for minority religious factions. They're quite tolerant and so forth. It's really just the Wahhabi-Sahleifists that they're talking about. And those are the main troublemakers that you see being bandied around on television, like Amjim Chowdry who's an MI5 plant whose group actually was created by MI5. Him and his cult followers are 100% protected by the British state. How can this guy go around exhorting people to join Islamic state and still be free? They're allowing him to do this because he's a scarecrow that the Neokhans roll out to convince everybody that Islam is a scary evil thing. But it's a dialectical thing because they're sponsoring extremists like that on one end. They're also funding the EDL and the opposition to that who only point to that and try to use that as some excuse to say all Muslims are bad and we need to be fighting wars for Israel. Let's not take care of the problem in our countries. Look at the Paris attack seemingly, you'd say, on the official level then they say, oh my god, this is bringing in problems. Let's close the borders and make sure that this discontinues. No, that's not what they do. The first thing they did was to issue a go ahead to bomb Syria. Right? It's like, wait a minute. This is going to bring more problem to the region, which is going to bring more drive more migrants to the West. And it's so completely orchestrated on both ends. With the Paris, they absolutely allowed it to happen. In fact, there's no possible way these guys could have entered Europe. They're all tagged on tear watch lists and were well known. The one guy from Belgium, his name is Abdel Hamid Aboude, was literally a household name in Belgium and they actually charged him at absentia before this attack. So his wanted poster was literally everywhere in Belgium prior to this attack. Well-known, he was in ISIS magazine interviews. He was everywhere. Somehow he just takes a chartered flight to Paris and gets all the weapons. So they allow it to happen. The French government was funding all the rebel groups in Syria since 2012. Halan was fully backing the rebels in Syria. And then they cry foul when it comes back. And they allow that to happen. So it's so dialectical. They're creating the terror themselves, they're at least allowing it to happen, funding it and so forth. And then they're using it as an excuse to do more intervention, more war, more bombing in the Middle East, which produces more migrants. And then it just feeds itself. These two things feed each other at the same time. So they want you to be pro-war and anti-Muslim, but then they want you also to be pro-immigration and pro-refugee. So it's very confusing to people. And then they have a hard time trying to explain these things to people. But that's almost a state, the state that they want things in. They want confusion. They want chaos. Well, the more you can't wrap your head around it, I think the more desperate people become to turn to the authorities on the issue. Wait a minute, what am I supposed to think about this? It gives them a perfect setup. And it also creates, I've mentioned this many times before on the show, but it creates a very schizophrenic relationship to these events that are occurring. Take 9-11, for example. We don't have to linger too much on that right now, but just as an example, officially Muslims did it. But if you're against building a mosque on ground zero, you're erasist. It's horrible with Islamophobia in America, but we need to go bomb them over there. It's remarkable how they managed to pull this off, but they have. It's a schizophrenic narrative that's being forced at on us. And it feeds into all of their agenda simultaneously. So they want to promote multiculturalism. So then they'll do these phony things about Islamophobia. But then at the same time, they're actually promoting that you hate Muslims because they want you to fight and kill them for Israel. So at the same time that doesn't even consider all the false likes and anecdotes going on, and all the foreign policy gametes involved in this. So especially with the migrant crisis, really, the best solution I think I've worked out is that, look, the three Western governments that are the most responsible for this are France, Britain, and the United States. You have absolutely been funding and fueling all of these rebel groups and insurgency is including ISIS, which was cultivated at these doops that were pulled out of American prison camps in Iraq in 2006, including Al-Baghdadi, who was literally a go-to guy for the US military in their prison camp. They orchestrated this. They built them up. They used these Gulf puppet regimes that they control, and they don't really act on their own unless they get the green light because they're basically glorified in US military bases. But the Gulf states have been providing all the funding and covert support. A lot to be has to the United States, at the behest of Israel. So it's delegated downwards, different roles to their puppet regimes in the region. But as far as refugee user concern, they would be better off in countries surrounding Syria. One, they're closer to Syria, so they'll be able to go home when the war is over. Two, they share a religion in a culture with those surrounding countries. They can assimilate very easily. We don't have to learn a new language. They already speak Arabic in these countries. The fact is Arabic is spoken through all those countries. It's a unifying factor in the Middle East, except perhaps Turkey and Iran. But they would do much better there than in Europe. How are they going to get a job in Europe? They don't even speak German. They don't speak all these languages. There's no way they can survive in Europe. Europe is already denigrated economically speaking. People in Europe can't even find jobs themselves. How are these migrants who don't speak English, who don't speak German, who don't speak Spanish, going to survive in these environments? They're just going to become a drain on the system and it's going to further aggravate people, understandably. At the same time, the money issue, I think that the French government, the British government, American government should pay for the, should pay at least some part of this issue to resettle these refugees in surrounding countries or pay for their living expenses. Not the taxpayer money, though, because the taxpayers didn't do this. The average citizens did not advocate for these criminal insane policies in the Middle East. It's the elites that did that. It's the Neocons. It's the bladers and the bushes and the cameras and the sarcosis. They should pay. They should pay at a pocket. Also, those Gulf states that are financing ISIS, that are financing all the insurgents that have besieged these countries, they should pay. They're filthy rich. These are filthy rich oil shifters. These corrupt oil barons. What are they doing? They haven't taken in a single refugee because that is part of the plan. The plan is send them to Europe. It's all being orchestrated. There's such simple solutions to these things that make sense and are good. Basically, are looking out for everybody involved, the migrants and Europeans. They don't want these solutions because these solutions do not coincide with their genocidal agenda, which is to literally erase Europe as a continent and to destroy the Islamic world and reshape it, reshuffle it in the interests of Israel. It's a sick criminal plan. Well, Brandon, let's take a break right here. Much more we want to discuss or talk about here. I definitely have some more issues I want to bring up in terms of colorgy and actually how some of his suggestions in terms of this moral supremacist bunch of people, how they've actually managed to manifest this in Europe. I'll message some of these organizations in the next segment here. Tell us about the websites that you run, that you're behind. Obviously, we've been talking here about grand deceptions. It's not your latest book, then. That's my mistake in the beginning there. Obviously, it's a second edition with this kind of material updated in it. Tell us how people can get a copy of this book. The second edition is almost done. It will be available on Amazon and create space within the next week. I'm going to be making a post on nonline media.com or I'll give an overview of some of the new updates with the book and detail some of the editions. That's all available on nonlinemedia.com. I'll have a link to that book permanently on the sidebar there. Very good. Nonlinemedia.com. You also have, I believe, Martina's perspective.com. Martina's perspective is just the repository for all of my articles. The main blogging venue is nonline media where you can catch my updates. ISIS conspiracy. That's still available too. Yeah. The ISIS conspiracy and hidden history is the two other anthologies that I put out. They're both available on Amazon and create space. You can find the links for those on nonline media. We'll have some links up to those folks who definitely check out the website if we want to get direct links to that. We'll take a break right here. We'll be back with Brandon Martinez. Stay with us everybody. We'll be right back. We'll proceed in the second hour. Another great segment coming up with Brandon Martinez where we further discuss and clarify some of the issues that we are currently struggling with when it comes to the migration crisis and how to awaken people to the issues of what real is going on behind the scenes. Specifically in the second hour, we discuss how to communicate with people who can only see the first layer of the problem and get them to not only see the symptoms but the roots of this issue. We talk about the people that can air get envisioned to be the moral guiding light of the pan-european movement and the extension of the European Union as we list the organization that have been created already to facilitate this. I think we can safely say that his vision has actually come into fruition. We discussed the union plan greater Israel and how they've been overplaying their hand in recent years. We also speculate if there's an opportunity to forge partnerships with the people in other parts of the world who understand the detrimental effects of globalism and also appreciate that we have a common enemy. We talk more about Pagida, UK and other kosher nationalist groups and although it's obviously a step in the right direction, it's not a movement that I think is enough if we are to not only understand but also to defeat the forces that have created the conditions that have given rise to these nationalist groups. The need for them is clear but in what direction should they go. We discussed the war in Syria towards the end and also what we need to do to become competitive in the war of ideology and information that is waging right now for the hearts and minds of people in Europe and the West. Great second hour coming up. Please stay tuned. The website where you can hear the rest is redicemembers.com. That's where we have all our shows archived in full. Going back to 2006, coming up on 10 years here soon, over a thousand shows. A lot for you to dig into there. So if you want to get access, sign up for membership and you can stream or download all of our shows including the videos inside episodes, films and much more that we have available there for you. By the way, we have some good shows coming up here. Dr. Stephen Flowers, aka Edred Thorson. We're going to talk about how to restore the Indo-European religion. We also have Steve Fanny-Walker Bson from the party of the Swedes. Frank Raymond to discuss his book, Sweet Dreams and Terror Sells. We also have Uttar Vinis about the Uwera Linda book. Very interesting find that I recently discovered about the freezians and old European civilizations, kind of a chronology of the origins of many European tribes and the movement of them. It's also been called the Himmler's Bible, by the way. Interesting stuff. We'll break right here. We'll be right back with Brandon Martinez. Please stay tuned. Second hour coming up. Redicemembers.com. We'll see you there.