Top 10 Reasons Not To Trust NASA

Video Transcript:

Look at this. Look at this. People actually believe. The deer is a car floating around up in space. Well, I think it looks so ridiculous and impossible. And you can tell it's real because it looks so fake honestly. We're not way better CGI in this fake. This is live on the air, okay? I'm going to zoom in on the earth in Photoshop. You see there is, okay, I'm going to go to image adjust levels and I'm going to bring the levels up. Uh oh. What is that? Why is your square box around the earth? It is Photoshop, but it's it's past it. It is Photoshop, but it's it's past it. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth. What truth? That you are a slave now. Like everyone else you were born and deboned. Born into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch. A prison for you or mine. So let's just just model of it. And then and list the help of a fight. Patis, you might know. Next segment I'm going to show you how NASA grabs objects in 3D space, rotates them around, and they can do this with water, with cloth, anything. And the cool thing about it is we can take what they're doing, what they're seeing with their contact virtual reality augmented lenses and put that on a separate video layer. Live. Okay, I have a lot of temp peak strokes, but this one here, this system glitches, this operative is not tracked as hand properly. And temp slips his hand underneath his other fingers, which is tightly only under the mic, which is impossible. You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly. We have way better CGI from which fake. Just another example of NASA faking space. Take a look here at this supposed image of Jupiter, nothing more than CGI fakery, the supposed auroras. Again, NASA's official website where it states how it will capture vivid auroras in Jupiter's atmosphere. Here's the problem, the date of June 30, 2016. Take a look at this, another so-called official image of Jupiter. This one's from back in 2014. You see the problem here? Now let's take a closer look at the supposed two images provided from NASA of Jupiter. All the clouds in the same exact position. There's a side by side. These people can't see what's taking place here with NASA. Nothing more than fakery and give me a break. This is a complete insult. You have a brain in your head. It looks like you're in a studio, maybe in Omaha, the brownskirts. The shot is so clear. Is this the hole? Are you really in space, Bill? Yeah. I don't know. We're going to have to do something for you. I don't know. I want to see a way. Oh yeah, I can do that. Watch this. Is this the hole? Are you really in space, Bill? I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm going to have to do something for you. I'm goingelimine for you at top 3. I'm going to have to do something for you. I don't know. Trying to get this first. Great. risklog here. It's just a whole jar, you really in space, still. See the hair? See the hair? And they just start making stuff up? Yeah. So, you're a strong guy. Have you seen him on the talk shows? Neil, I'm assuming the first man to walk on the moon talk about a fish story. Yeah. Oh, man, and they're buying it. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Oh, yeah. So, many times during space walks outside the international space station, we can see air bubbles rising up. Can you touch on how there are air bubbles in space? Um, can you do more specific air bubbles? So, yeah, like a lot of times during the footage, the NASA footage, you can see bubbles coming up out of the helmin, or kind of from underneath you. How do you explain bubbles in space? Yeah, I'm not sure exactly where you're going to be. Now, there's probably a water in the helmin, and it comes with either from sweat or from the cooling garments. And, you know, that's generally what that is. I've never seen any kind of air bubbles anymore. I'm sure you're going to be able to hear filming in another water pool and you're not really out there. Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know you can't explain, but you feel it. You felt it your entire life. But there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is, but it's there, like a splinter in your mind, driving a bad. You're a coward and a liar and a thing. In 1986, the shuttle Challenger exploded about 74 seconds after taking, killing all seven astronauts inside. Or did it? It turns out that six of the seven are still alive and cooking for diamonds. L. S. N. Onozuka claims to be his identical twin brother, Claude. Yeah, I've got an identical twin brother, Claude, too. The Challenger pilot, Mickey Smith, has an even bothered changing his name. He's now Professor Michael J. Smith, of University of Wisconsin. Now, Kristen McAuliffe is a bit of a sneaky man. She was the Challenger at Playload Specialist, like famous for being a teacher. It turns out during her astral base, she was using her middle name, Krista. And now, what she goes by her first name, Sharon. The Challenger commander, Francis Richard Scoby, is now on Dick Scoby, which sounds like a rather unpleasant disease. Due to Fresnick, the Challenger mission specialist, again, has an even bothered changing her name. She's a Professor at Yale Law. And finally, Ronald Smith, now, another Challenger mission specialist, claims to be his identical twin brother, Claude McNear. Well, all the odds. So there, which is my little business, looking at Google Earth, and this big snow covered monstrosity, is staring me in the face like, um, why is that covering the snow? So I keep digging a little bit deeper. And I found again, right, this cloud cover here, and a few images pop up. And this help. Images, what are they? Well, this we got. I'm sure that looks familiar to you right? Looks just like the pictures that give us a Mars. So I'm just kind of creeping around here and definitely noticing the same kind of, undulation changes and same kind of rocks and kind of dirt. The only thing that's missing is that nice little red tint that they pay somebody, 150,000 dollars a year to put on that. So I'll keep kind of going through here and see if it, what the... Yeah, so, look, I'm in the truck. Yeah, it's just nasty, what's that say? Mars project. I think I found out where Mars is, guys. At some point in the future, we'll look back and say, how did we do it without space? The kinds of technologies that we're testing out on space station are definitely helping us with our goals of going beyond low-rather-bit. Early in the next decade, a set of crude flights will test and prove the systems required for exploration beyond low-rather-bit. Right now, we only can fly in Earth orbit. That's the part that we can go in this new system that we're building is going to allow us to go beyond and hopefully take humans into solar system to explore. We get further away from Earth. We'll pass through the Van Allen belt, an area of dangerous radiation. We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space. We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space. There's a small problem with going to the moon. Inch by inch, NASA is leaking out that they know that there's a problem there. It's called the Van Allen belts, high radiation belts of charged particles around Earth. And we don't know how to get through them, they say. Well, isn't that interesting because they sure didn't seem to be a problem back in 1969? The moon landing stopped in 1972 and we haven't been back. We haven't been beyond the Van Allen belts. NASA admitted that it had lost the original footage of man's first steps on the moon. On YouTube, they watched a funny thing happen on the way to the moon. It contains newly discovered evidence, which is part of the missing tapes of outtakes from the first mission to the moon, of them falsifying a shot of being halfway to the moon. But NASA to come out and say that all the tapes are erased, I mean, it's incredible. However, this isn't just one tape. This is rooms of tape labeled Apollo 11 moon landing. Someone have to physically go and erase it. It's very challenging to try to prove remembers on the moon and it shouldn't be challenging. The tape should be there, this should be plenty of evidence. I mean, it's proof right there. This is an official massive photo of the first Apollo 11 lunar module. The landing on the moon on this right there is proof that it's a picture of the first landing on the moon. But the only problem I have with this picture is that it's taken from the moon. People who believe they saw the landing on the moon because they hurt it on the radio. The moon is a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. The moon is a real star. There's a picture of the inside actually being deployed from the spacecraft. Did you see it in the background? There was a guy in the background, man. I'm not kidding you. You can't deny that that someone in the background, there's a guy moving in the background. The moon is a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. It's a real star. I'll tell you, if nothing else, here's why you can tell they're not safe. Just to create the paperwork, that amount of paperwork would make faking it prohibitively expensive. No one could afford to generate that much documentation. All of that happened in a little town called York, Maine, across the United States from where we're talking to you right now. My research of the last year has led me to the conclusion that not even low earth orbit is possible, that the International Space Station is a hoax, and all man space travel is fake. First though, let's have a look at the International Space Station. I want to talk about some of the anomalies I see there. For the inside of the International Space Station, there are a couple of zero gravity tricks that they use to fake it. The first is they have a complete mock-up of the International Space Station built on the inside of an airplane, and that airplane does a bunch of risers and falls, it does an upside down parabolic trajectory, and that simulates zero gravity. The other main way they simulate the zero gravity is with suspension in front of a blue screen, and they use that trick for extended periods of time for longer than 45 second segments, but they can't move around as much. They can't do the acrobatic flips and rolls in the extended mode. There's full motion mode where they can fully move around, and that's factored plane, and then there's suspended or extended mode where they're suspended by wires in front of a blue screen. They don't move around as much, but they can make the scene last for a longer period of time. The extended mode is much quieter than the full motion mode. In full motion mode, you can actually hear the sound of the jet engines, engines of the airplane. In every single scene of full motion mode, in every segment of the International Space Station, you can hear this loud sound, the sound of jet engines. You could argue that it's the additional incision. So you can take it out. Not even an off-the-set conditioner is that loud, and why is there a loud sound in every segment of the International Space Station? This is going to be alright. The storm storm sparked several ABC digital. One, giving the opportunity to swear on the Bible that you walked on the moon. Well, you put your left hand on the Bible and swear to God that you walked on the moon. You have $5,000 cash. You can give it to charity if you swear on the Bible that you walked on the moon. I have a cake. It's a big one. Why don't you swear to God? Why not? Why won't you do it? The Earth, supposedly 23.4 degrees on this axis. Of course, the Ecclotic Dover, again 66.6 degrees off, well, Earth is supposedly orbiting on the Sun at 66,600 miles an hour.