Have Australians gone nuts or is it something else?

Video Transcript:

The results from the 2021 Australian Census revealed an astonishing 25% jump in the nation's Aboriginal population over the preceding five years. This confirmed the trend of the 2016 Census, showing a 19% surge in the Aboriginal population. Over the last decade the self-identifying Aboriginal percentage of the population of Australia has increased from 2.5 to 3.2%. This massive increase in Aboriginal self-identification is not the result of a sudden surge in Aboriginal fertility. What is the culmination of the establishment of an intellectual of political and economic climate that encourages white Australians to shed their racial identity? Like other Western societies buffeted by waves of non-wide immigration and anti-wide intellectual and political activism, Australia is now a nation where white people are actively discriminated against. And where significant social and financial advantages are crude to non-white people. Commentators in the leftist media, louded the leap in Aboriginal self-identification, claiming the statistics show, Australians finally feel safe to identify as Aboriginal. In truth, the growing embrace of Aboriginal identity and flight from whiteness is symptomatic of the anti-white trajectory of Australian society as a whole. Commentator Andrew Bolt sees the dramatic increase in the number of white Australians calling themselves black. As evidence of Australia's toxic anti-white, racism, it's now so embarrassing to be white that another 90,000 Australians have decided to call themselves black instead. Or let's put it more kindly. It's now so she'd be black that these 90,000 Australians have called themselves Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander for the first time in the last census. The 2021 census is dramatic evidence of the new anti-white racism and of the growing fraud that comes from lavishing privileges on people claiming to be Aboriginal, with few questions asked. The 2016 census found at least 40,000 people who claimed to be Aboriginal or Islander, but had likewise chosen not to, in the previous survey. Still, who can blame them from seizing any excuse, however remote or imagined, to stop being white? Check woke bookshops that stock white hostile titles such as white fragility, or back to black. Our consultant journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, which last year published an insanely racist paper calling Whiteness, a malignant parasitic-like condition that renders its host's appetites for ashes, insatiable. So it's no surprise that the biggest rises in people now claiming to be Aboriginal, are in our Wocas states. In Victoria, the rise was a spectacular 37% in five years. New South Wales, was second with 29%. In contrast, the Northern Territory, with the biggest proportion of Aborigines, the rise was just 5%. Back in 2009, Bolt wrote two columns pointing out that individuals with tiny amounts of Aboriginal ancestry, or none, were taking advantage of a raft of government scholarships and affirmative action job vacancies, by choosing to identify exclusively as Aborigines. Bolt claimed these people were choosing to identify as black to leverage their career and social advancement. For pointing out this rather obvious fact, and that this increasing Aboriginal self-identification, had been encouraged by the multitude of financial and professional incentives, available to those identifying as Aboriginal. Bolt was halted in record and found guilty of violating Section 18C, of the Racial Discrimination Act, the enactment of which was a direct result of Jewish activism. Let's repeat that. The Racial Discrimination Act, the enactment of which was a direct result of Jewish activism. In September 2010, nine of the Aboriginal people Bolt identified in his articles, commenced legal proceedings against him and his employer, the Harold Sun. The Complenance, Rep. Gratis, in the Federal Court by the Jewish Barrester's Ron Merkel and Herman Borenstein, sought an apology, legal costs and a gag on republishing the articles and blogs and other relief as the court deems fifth. In the trial, Merkel argued in reference to Bolt's articles that this kind of thinking led to the November Grace Laws and that Bolt had adopted a eugenic approach to Aboriginality. In his ruling for the Complenance in 2011, the presiding Judge Morty Bromberg, also a Jew, declared that, I am satisfied that first-kind Aboriginal people, or some of them, were reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to have been offended, insulted, humiliated or intimidated by the imputations conveyed by the newspaper articles. Even if I have been satisfied that Section 18C conduct was capable of being fair comment, I would not have been satisfied that it was set or done by Mr. Bolt reasonably, and in good faith. Thus, good faith, as interpreted by a Jewish judge, is now the criteria for acceptable speech about race in Australia. With this to be determined by the likes of Justice Bromberg, who is a prominent member of the Australian Jewish community. Today, the increasingly anti-white insanity of Australian society, and proliferating government programs designed to redress Aboriginal social dysfunction. Currently costing taxpayers around $33 billion annually, or $55,000 per aboriginal, are fueling a population boom. Those with negligible amounts of aboriginal ancestry, or none, self-identifying as indigenous, to access ever-expanding indigenous welfare programs, scholarships and career opportunities. The practice of wide Australians, self-identifying as Aboriginal has become so widespread, that Sydney's Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council, recently made a complaint to a government anti-corruption body about the number of Sydney university students, identifying as Aboriginal by using just statutory declarations. Rather than producing a confirmation of identity letter, from a local Aboriginal Land Council or other indigenous community-controlled organization. Showing they meet the Commonwealth 3-part identity test, that they are of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent. Identify as such, and their identity is accepted by a community in which they live or previously lived. Bruce Pasco, the poster child, for the benefits of fleeing whiteness. The remarkable professional and financial benefits that can accrue to white Australians, willing to discard their racial identity to become Aboriginal, is illustrated by the spectacular rise of historian, Bruce Pasco. Before his rise to fame, Pasco was the obscure author of works such as the 1988 novel, The Fox, about a fugitive searching for his aboriginality. Critics at the time, suggested it would have been a better book, had Pasco not been a white man. Pasco is after all, imagining the psyche of an Aboriginal person, he writes as a humane informed liberal, but as a white man as well. Around this time Pasco started identifying as Aboriginal, even though two Aboriginal groups call him a fraud, and his genealogy shows, that all his ancestors are of English descent. But now as an Aboriginal, Pasco has enjoyed wild career and financial success, hailed as an elder, promoted as an Aboriginal historian by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Given grants for Aboriginal enterprises, and made a professor of indigenous agriculture by the University of Melbourne, indigenous agriculture is a fake discipline invented by Pasco, using so-called evidence to claim aborigines were farmers, in his widely acclaimed and promoted 2014 book, Dark Immu. The authors of all the textbooks currently used in Australian schools, are content to blame all Aboriginal problems on Europeans, who may charge with genocide. These are informed in one textbook, that while previous generations of historians used words like settled, settlement and settler to describe the arrival of Europeans in Australia, modern, woke historians. Much prefer words such as colonists and invader. These modern historians we are informed, also use the word genocide, to describe the experience of first nations peoples of Australia. Days anti-white historians, and the activist authors of school textbooks, straddle a muddy line between contradictory narratives. On the one hand we are told that British settlers sneakily, and immorally, stole the land of the indigenous peoples. While, at the same time, the British arrival in Australia is characterized as an invasion. Yet if we accept the invasion thesis, then it follows that Australian territory was conquered in a war, and not stolen, by the British, just as warring Aboriginal tribes conquered each other's territory. It is hardly surprising, that in response to such practices, the diffusion of bogus anti-white historical narratives in Australian schools, and the raft of financial and professional incentives available to Aboriginal people today. We are seeing a sharp increase in the number of white Australians identifying as black. The spectacular professional rise of individuals like Bruce Pasco, only demonstrates the rich rewards, that can flow from shedding one's white identity, in contemporary Australia. All of the crown countries, including Australia, have shown an accelerated decline due to Jewish influence. The United States is now suffering the same fate, and will be much worse soon, should decent people fail to act.