Donate.

Advertisement

Welcome to the Literal Nanny State -MRR -READ INFO 1ST

Please select playlist name from following

Mirror from TSM- Go watch the whole thing and sub/+1 if you do the tube nonsense!
****NOTE: If this goes near passing... please make a rule of your house that anyone from a medical standpoint ie: around germs ... MUST wear one of these in its ENTIRETY.. before enter your house!!!!!!!!
****NOTE Attire for idiots on visits. Cheap and effective if the heat is on say.. 80 degrees inside or so!
https://www.ebay.com/p/Safety-Hazmat-Suit-Bug-out-Paint-Epidemic-Disasters-Survival-Protection-Kit/1461622855?iid=131324880563.
Dont speak.. dont sign.. dont interact until they are dressed to enter and a head shake or no response would be best! Good luck!
https://www.youtube.com/user/TRUTHstreammedia

9 Comments

Please login to comment

Video Transcript:

Today we're going to talk about vaccines. So I don't know if you guys saw, but apparently the World Health Organization in 2019 has declared that among the top threats to global health are anti-vaxxers. Movement in the United States means label a global health threat. It's the anti-vaxxer movement. Now the World Health Organization has labeled anti-vaxxers as one of their top 10 global health threats for 2019. It's not high. So if for whatever reason you don't want to vaccinate yourself or your children, you are now officially considered a top threat to global health by who? In addition to anti-vaxxers, the World Health Organization also named Air Pollution Climate Change Non-Communicable Diseases and HIV to their list of global health threats. And you have states all over the place trying to pass legislation to remove a parent's right to exempt their child from vaccines. And I'm for parental rights, not government coercion telling us what we can do, what we can't do with our kids. There is no other mandated procedure. First of all, it's illegal. We can't make people do procedures that they don't want. Oregon is one such state. In 2015 they tried to do this and there was a huge public outcry. People were super angry about it and it did not pass because people wouldn't stand for it. But now, seemingly as an in-run around that, what you have is Oregon is now set to become the first state in the nation to require universal home visits for all parents who have babies or adopt children in Oregon. Bill 526 has been introduced and you'll notice Senator Hayward's name is number one up on that list. We'll get to her in just a minute. But they are passing a thing right now to study the feasibility of these home visits and submit the findings to get this going as soon as possible. They're saying they have to do this because an emergency is declared to exist. Look down here at Section 3, it says, this 2019 act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety and emergency is declared to exist and this act takes effect on its passage. So they're trying to get this through as quickly as they possibly can. So there you go, there's no law that you have to take vaccines or that you have to let a government worker into your house and again, with no warrant or anything. And they want to give you the idea that so-called public health trumps your personal rights and you can see right here they're trying to use the perception that this is some prevailing emergency to just trample on people's rights, disrespect their privacy and get into your home and attempt to get into your head and tell you what to do. And this guy's Patrick Allen, he runs the Oregon Health Authority and they interviewed him about it at the Beaverton Valley Times. And he says that he is most excited about the beginning investment in a six year program to create universal home visits for new parents. When the program is complete, every new parent and that includes adoptions, we'll receive a series of two or three visits by someone like a nurse or health care practitioner. And then they get real vague about what may or may not happen to those visits, but the visits could include basic health screenings for babies, hooking parents up with primary care physicians, linking them to other services and coordinating the myriad childhood immunizations that babies need, which is the most specific thing on the list. These are people who, if they're registered nurses, if they're regular nurses, have had a few years of medical training, but it doesn't make them more qualified to raise your child than you who love them. So basically you've got door to door salesmen for the big farm companies and the vaccine companies trying to sell their poisons and push them on people who've been holding out against taking them. And you can virtually guarantee that they'll be doing the home visits to those people who don't have their vaccine records up to dates. They'll be hitting those houses first. But I'm pretty sure you don't have to let them in. It doesn't seem very constitutional to me. You don't even have to answer the census question other than telling them how many people live in your house. As I said, everything surrounding this is incredibly vague. And as Paula Boyard points out over at PJ Media, it's not absolutely clear whether these are going to be mandatory or not, but the use of the term universal suggests that it would be. And they're at least going to send them to your house and you're going to have to have interaction one way or the other, whether you turn them away or not. Well, aren't you going to ask me to come in? And they're not talking about what's going to happen if you refuse such a visit under a mandated universal program. But she also goes on to point out proponents for this are arguing that without this kind of state mandated surveillance, children are at higher risk for abuse and neglect, which for some reason they believe that agents of the government can protect these children from despite the fact that in Oregon, children in the foster care system are abused at twice the national rate. So is this writer points out how are they exactly going to quote unquote take care of another 40,000 children every year when they can't even take care of the ones that are already in their foster care system, considering their abuse at twice the national rate in this country in the state of Oregon. It's outrageous. This isn't something for people in trouble. This is stuff all kids need. Alan says. And then about a week later, they put out another article. They describe it a little bit more down here. It's actually going to be three visits. It says it two weeks the baby's weight gain will be checked. The baby could get a heel stick, the pin prick drawing a blood that checks for metabolic indicators of problems, which at that point show no outward symptoms. At two months, the nurses and families could discuss the many vaccines that babies face. So at two months is when you as a parent will now be pressured into vaccinating your child with someone coming into your home to tell you that you should do it. Um, yeah, we have 20 or 30, maybe 40 rounds of vaccines and we're using this state emergency law to try to high pressure sell you. What do you think? We could do it right here. And it also says they're going to not just check on the baby, but they're also going to be checking up on the parents. So they're, they're saying, because you know, having a baby stressful. So they're going to be looking for signs of postpartum depression and they're going to be making sure there's a safe place for the baby to sleep and to be bathed and more. They're going to be looking for more. They didn't say what the more is, but that's what that's what they're going to be doing. Sounds like a pretty open free reign of who knows what they're going to be doing. You know what it sounds like? It sounds like preemptively sending a CPS worker into every person's house who has a baby in Oregon who's also going to pressure them in having vaccinations. That's actually just, if you sum it all up, that's a lot of what it sounds like to me when I read this. Absolutely.