There Never Was, and Still Is Not, a ’Contagious Virus’... Part 1/3...

Video Transcript:

Before I get started, let me ask you how would you feel if you found out that there never was a contagious virus in the first place? Not what would you think, but how would you actually feel? Would you feel angry, relieved, annoyed, perplexed? Like how would you feel if you actually found that out? You might be wondering then if there never was a contagious virus then what was the whole point of the last three years? I'm going to be getting in to all of that in this video. This is an important video and so it's divided into three parts. In the first part, I'm going to address your belief system and we'll look at how you arrived at your belief system. Many people were scared and had their belief system formed with a lot of emotional fear. Did you know that you can pretty much make someone believe anything if they're afraid and not thinking clearly? If right now you believe that there was a contagious virus after the last three years then it really doesn't matter how much evidence I present you with to the contrary, you're still going to believe that until we address your belief system. That's simply because you'll selectively choose information that supports your existing beliefs and discard information that doesn't. It's called cognitive bias. So that's why we first need to look at your belief system, address any fallacies in those beliefs and then you can see the truth, see the evidence clearly and create an informed belief and really understand what's going on and operate from an understanding of knowledge. In the second part, I'm going to address some common sense questions of how people quote unquote in the know acted. Action speak louder than words. Remember that. The actions of those in the know were not that of a deadly pandemic. Rather they were that of an imaginary virus in psychological warfare. And of course a select group of individuals making a whole lot of money. And finally in the third part, I'm going to present you with official documents from very authoritative sources simply because people do trust authorities, even nowadays, the people, the government organizations and the agencies that were promoting the virus, that clearly indicate this was simply what psychological warfare. There never was a contagious virus and there still isn't. The quote unquote infection is through the injection. And finally, I'll conclude what you can do with this information. So you may be asking yourself why is it important to know this? Well, it's one of the core foundational lies of a whole series of lies that happened after March 2020. Take away that foundation and the whole House of Cards tumbles down and the entire conduit scam unravels and you see what's going on. And then with that clarity, you're able to take decisive action to lead a prosperous life, help your family and community to the same. A small group of very sick, evil perverted, wealthy and powerful individuals are trying to steal your wealth and your health. And if you don't know why or how, it makes it difficult to defend yourself. However, once you do understand that, you can defend yourself effectively and get rid of the sick evil. This video gives you those tools to protect yourself and fight back effectively. So let's get started. So part one, your belief system. If right now, after three years, you still believe there was or is a contagious virus, we're going to need to look at how you arrive at your belief system. So why do you believe that? I've talked to lots and lots of people, literally hundreds and hundreds of people. And those common reasons are number one, they know someone who died from COVID. Therefore, they know it was COVID. Well, how do they know it? Usually it's because a doctor, i.e. a trusted authority figure, told them the illness was related to COVID. Therefore, they believe it. They don't question it. They just trust it. Or number three, other types of authority figures told them it was COVID. i.e. an anchorman on TV, a government official, etc., etc. Number four, they quote unquote, tested positive from a COVID test. And therefore, they know it must have been COVID. Number five, they experienced what they believe the symptoms of COVID to be. Number six, they couldn't smell, therefore believed it was the virus. Number seven, a fact checker, fact check to claim. And they trusted the results that showed up in Google implicitly. That told them that it was COVID. Number eight, they got much sicker in previous years or for a much longer periods of time. Therefore, believe it was COVID. They believed contrary new sources, such as the lab leak theory and the or the back theory or some other theory, whatever's going on today. And as long as it says it was still COVID, they believe that or basically something along those lines. So if you believe you got COVID and recovered or that there was a virus whatsoever, chances are it's based on one of the above belief systems. So i'm going to address the fallacies in each of those beliefs. However, before I proceed, did you know that people could have gotten sick from the mass, the tests, the stress, the chemical sprayed in the workplaces, and more? Did you know, supposedly the things designed to protect you could have actually been making you sick and causing, quote unquote, the symptoms of COVID. For example, let's look at the mass. Number one, mass were sprayed with poison such as PFTE, which stands for poly tetraethroidol ethylene. And it could break down when you breathed on it and it would cause respiratory issues. Basically, it's fluoride poisoning. Number two, titanium dioxide. Did you know that breathing in these particles, also present on a number of mass, could cause respiratory issues? Number three, did you know that if you decrease your oxygen levels, there's actually a medical term called hypoxia, which causes health issues. Basically, it's suffocating yourself. Like if you suffocate yourself, you're going to have health issues. You're not breathing properly. Number four, did you know that you could actually breathe in fibers from the mass that got lodged in your lungs and caused respiratory issues? So anyways, all of these would have caused the so-called symptoms of the condent fires. So let's look at hand sanitizers. Did you know that hand sanitizers are extremely toxic to your body? Because your body's largest organ, your skin, absorbs the toxins directly into the skin. And basically, you could have had the symptoms of quote-unquote COVID. Did you know that none were approved by health Canada at the time of the COVID outbreak? And yet heavily promoted as something to use? Let's look at the tests. Did you know that the tests were doused in something called ethylinoxide? That if inhaled or ingested could cause respiratory issues or cancer. Aside from the fact that jamming a stick up your nose to touch your brain, is extremely damaging on so many different levels. Did you know that the cleaning products, they had a lot of chlorine-based cleaning products, could cause respiratory issues among other health issues? Now, did you know that the FDA, a major organization in the USA, knew all of the side effects from the so-called vaccines, which aren't vaccines in October 2020, yet pushed them anyways? Now, many people might have a gut reaction and say, oh, well, they had to say that so they don't get sued. Because they're used to watching TV commercials from pharmaceutical companies that promote drugs with extensive dislammers. I.e. basically saying, well, if you use this product anyways and develop a problem, that's your problem, not ours. But this FDA document, it's not a television commercial. The FDA was not advertising a product for sale. They were not creating a disclaimer. This document was from a discussion as part of a presentation made to other officials of what the side effects were. And in October 2020, before they started rolling up the jabs in mass, they knew people could get at least one of over the 20 diseases, including death, as a side effect. Yep, one ahead and did it anyways. So if you got the jab, you could also be experiencing, quote-unquote, COVID symptoms, but it's not from a mysterious virus. It's actually from the jab. The shots are designed to cause harm, not to cure anything, especially something that doesn't exist. So basically, before we've even addressed any of the belief systems, many of the things that supposedly were designed to protect you could have actually caused the very illness, supposedly that this virus caused. So anyways, let's look at the belief systems. Number one, you know someone who died from COVID? How? Most likely a doctor. If you know someone who died, how do you know? It's because it trusted a authority figure told you that they did. And you trusted them implicitly without questioning their motives. Why? Well, most people have been taught pretty much their whole life that doctors are about reproached, that they can do no harm. If you're like most people, you're right that this conclusion from television programming and social conditioning, television programs like the Good Doctor, ER, Mass, General Hospital, Chicago Med, etc., etc., almost always portray the doctors in an excellent way. Any quote-unquote bad doctor is portrayed as an outlier. They never really show doctors being pressured by pharmaceutical reps on an almost daily basis to sell drugs. They never really show doctors being in content and not reading the latest medical advances because they figure they know everything or they're overworked. They don't usually show doctors being influenced by money to have their name put on say a new hospital or pay their Mercedes bill or pay their for the bills for their luxury mansion or be interviewed on TV and get more stuff that doesn't feel important. They don't usually show any of that. So they don't normally show doctors having vices, but rather tend to present doctors as whole other than thou and only doing good. So if you had that belief system, yeah, I can see how it would be pretty hard to believe that they'd either be mistaken or lying to you. The fact is, many doctors were financially incentivized to say that an illness was COVID-related when in fact it wasn't. They were also threatened financially by governing bodies with losing their license if they spoke out against the narrative, such as the CPSO in Canada. In the US, hospitals would literally get tens of thousands of dollars if something was listed as a COVID-related illness. And as an aside, what's really funny is even the quote-unquote fact checkers agree that hospitals did indeed get more money. You just have to scroll all the way to the end of the article to see their conclusion. Maybe a sizable donation from the hospital from organizations such as the Bill and Linda Gates Foundation, influencer to see other doctors simply relied on reports all the way up the food chain to do their thinking for them. If they actually read any reports, it might have just simply been a cursory look. They didn't realize that the people preparing the reports had invested interest in selling masks. The vaccines, which obviously aren't vaccines, they're poison-pricks, death jabs, whatever you want to call them, or other medical gear. Doctors in nurses like are not imbued with some kind of divine knowledge. Unfortunately, that's exactly how many of them acted. They just figured, since they were a doctor, they somehow magically knew what was going on. A janitor that would take the time to read a few reports would actually know a heck of a lot more than the most esteemed doctor with the largest number of degrees from the best universities that never actually read a page or bothered to even look into it and just took someone else's word for it. Many doctors in hospitals were also just simply doing what they were told, or following what we know so far articles compiled by the government entities. In other words, the doctor didn't actually think. They didn't reason. They just followed orders. So, do you now see how if you were told by a doctor, someone that you've been conditioned, most of your life to trust? If that doctor told you that someone, quote unquote, died from COVID, that A, it may not necessarily be accurate, and that B, it might not actually be an unbiased diagnosis. Can you see how there would have actually been other factors influencing that statement? So, let's move on to the second part. Anchorman and Anchor-Lemon, on quote unquote news, people tend to trust news organizations such as CNN or Fox Media. As an aside, they don't realize a lot of the news organizations are owned by the same corporate entities. If I head left, I don't mind. Well, our greatest responsibility is to start our treasure value communities. The olpazzolus groups is communities. We are extremely proud of the quality, balanced journalism, that city's war news produced. But, we're not concerned about the trouble of the trend, there's also a lot of one-sided news stories. Generally speaking, they've grown up with the belief that journalists do something called investigative journalism. What they don't realize is that is journalism from 30 years ago, and it's much, much different from journalism today. Many so-called journalists simply regurgitate what is presented to them from government officials and parrot it on TV. That's propaganda, that's not research, that's not investigating. They don't even really do any kind of critical thinking. I personally have spoken with journalists and news directors over the last three years, and pretty much that's exactly what's beset I've gotten it straight from the horse's mouth. I've been told by news reporters that they were given reports from the government authority figures and simply trusted the information. Didn't look into it further, they just regurgitated what was in the report. Some even had a cognitive bias. IE1 fellow I spoke with because he can quote, knew someone who had died from COVID, because that doctor told him he would automatically dismiss anything to the contrary. And in fact, when I was talking with him, he got quite upset that it could even be suggested that his doctor was internally in the truth. I've also been told by program directors of both radio and TV stations that because they feel strapped for cash and understaffed, they don't do a deep dive into stories. At most, if they want to confirm something, they would simply do a couple of Google searches to see what other people are saying, and if other people seem to be saying the same things, things, that's okay. It's more the quantity of stories that they can turn out and not the quality. In other words, these radio and news organizations are just trying to get click-bady articles. And finally, most of the news publications are owned by small conglomerates, which are in turn owned by larger conglomerates, which basically give the marching orders to the entire news organizations. For example, in Canada, independent media is not really independent. Post media owns most of the larger news publications in Canada, and in turn, post media is owned by a larger group called the Chattam Group, which also owns US publications. So basically, it's like the pyramid structure. You have one person at the top, telling everybody else what to do, and then threatening them if they don't comply. So as you can see, it's very easy to manipulate and control information. So for example, if you go to the Toronto Sun on the East Coast, and then you decide you're going to compare information in the Vancouver Sun on the West Coast, you're getting the exact same information from the same people. It may be worded a little bit differently, but it's the same information. And then finally, what was interesting in these sort of news organizations is usually if someone questioned what was going on, they'd be threatened with being fired and losing their job, their livelihood. And of course, I'm sure most people can understand what that feels like, as most were threatened or most likely threatened with losing their job, unless they wore demon diaper or got a poisonous injection in their arm. Fortunately, a lot of people said no. However, you can certainly understand that feeling, correct? So with respect to news, can you now understand how you might not actually be getting, quote, unbiased reporting, but in fact, extremely biased reporting that is based on a combination of laziness and monetary influence? So that brings us to the next item, testing positive. So there's a lot of people that will say, well, since they test a positive, therefore they know what COVID exists. And that's operating on some big assumptions. Number one, that there's only one test. And then number two, that that test is 100% accurate. However, it's never occurred to many people. Not only was there more than one test, but that they could also be inaccurate. Did you know that, for example, there's numerous tests testing for different portions of the so-called virus that could also give a positive result for something else? A woman who goes by the name of Yami Doctor made the fascinating discovery way back at the beginning that the test was actually testing for human DNA. And here's the link. You can watch the video yourself if you're interested. Next, did you know that there actually is not one standardized test? Most people were under the assumption that their voices seem like type of test, but there wasn't. So if there's different types of tests, testing for different things, how can you be sure you're getting accurate information? It's like saying you're going to try and figure out if someone's overweight by smelling how bad their breath is. And then for a second person, you're going to figure out if they're overweight by looking at the color of their hair. It just doesn't make sense. And they're different things. Next, did you know that Kerry Mollis, the actual inventor of the PCR test in the 1980s, actually said that it was not intended as a diagnostic tool. It was simply used for amplification. Yes. PCR is separate from that. It's just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That's why it's not, it doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that. That's why it's not. So if you can't diagnose with it, what is this test actually showing you? Did you know that even the mainstream media talked about, for example, the president of Tanzania in May 2020, testing a goat, a papaya, and a quail, and all the results came back positive. Or how about Elon Musk, a quote unquote, high profile figure, supposedly tested both positive and negative at the same time. So basically, if you test positive, if you want to be negative, test again. So let me ask you this, if it's possible to manipulate whether or not a result is positive or negative, depending what lab you send it to. If it's possible to have a piece of fruit, like a papaya, or an animal like a goat come back positive, if there's no standardized test, in other words, it's testing for different things from different people, then not only what are you testing for, but how can you be certain that whatever results you get actually has any meaning whatsoever. So let's move on to the next item. COVID symptoms. A lot of people will say, oh, they caught COVID because they had the symptoms. Well, let's see, according to the CDC, possible symptoms, not meaning absolute, just possible. Possible symptoms include fever, chills, coughing, shortness of breath, fatigue, body aches, and so forth. So let's think, what other things can possibly make you feel that way? Well, having a cold or the flu. If you went drinking too much with your buddies, that could make you nauseous or vomit. So does that mean for every time you went out the last 20 years of your life, every time you got nauseous or vomited, you actually had COVID, and you weren't simply drunk, or if you y'all had a concert, you had a sore throat, or was that actually just COVID? Or if you run up a hill and you have shortness of breath, does that mean actually every time you went jogging, you actually had COVID, did you have pre-COVID COVID? Being overweight can make you have shortness of breath. Does that mean if you're overweight, you have COVID? We're can over 20 minutes, doing heavy cardio can make you have shortness of breath. Does that mean you have COVID? Obviously the answer is no. Over the last two years, most people worldwide have been a victim of a powerful psychological type of manipulation. That's been perfected by the military to use for attack and control people, and it's called trauma-based mind control. It's basically a psychological form of torture that can manipulate people into believing in anything. In other words, gaslighting someone on steroids. Some of the organizations that do this is the Tabestock Institute and programs called MKUltra and so forth. So it's basically like this. Let's see, we're walking down the street with a friend. Then your friend turned to you and said the sky was pink. You'd probably laugh at them. But what if they sincerely insisted that no, no, no, the sky was indeed pink? You might think there were a little on that, but you might have a little bit of doubt. So later on that day, you go to a close relative and you say, hey, my buddy, you told me this isn't that silly. But then your close relative says, well, of course it's pink. Didn't you know? Now you're kind of scratching your head and you're wondering maybe someone's just playing a joke on you. But what if there's a possibility that it's actually pink? Maybe there's something wrong with your eyes? So if you say went home that evening, told your spouse, girlfriend, boyfriend, whatever, and then they said, of course it's pink. Why would you think otherwise? You really might begin to doubt your own sanity and your own reality, even though this guy is in fact blue. This is essentially what has happened over the last several years, but in a much more powerful form of about a thousand times. The COVID symptoms are basically designed to make you fearful and assume that anything, any kind of illness you get must be COVID. It's not. So let's move on to the next item. You say you couldn't smell that and therefore you must have COVID. Well, question for you. In your entire life, in pre-COVID-COVID times, when your nose was stuffy and plugged up, could you actually smell anything? Probably not. But the thing is you just didn't pay attention to it. You didn't care. You were sick. So what's going on right now is simply another psychological trick. It's like when you buy a yellow sweater, then you notice everybody has a yellow sweater. However, before you purchase that yellow sweater, you never notice that. The psychotic sociopathic narcissists are simply directing your attention to something you never paid attention to before. And that is simply if you have a cold, you can't really smell anything. Your nose is plugged up. And likewise, also the diet that you eat can cause you to have a lot of mucus in your nose. So for example, if you're eating a lot of sugary sweets or you're allergic to certain types of foods, you can't really smell either. So it's got nothing to do with any, quote, quote, mysterious fires. It's your nose is plugged up. So then next thing is Google. So you think an independent factchapper or whatever appears in Google must be 100% correct, right? While in the past maybe 20 years ago, generally speaking, the results were fairly accurate. And for certain types of information, you've had a good experience for finding accurate information with Google, just because what you find on a particular topic is accurate doesn't mean Google is accurate for everything else. And that includes the other major search engines and the other major social media sites. In fact, it's very easy to manipulate results in Google. And there's an entire, there's an entire industry that's called search engine optimization. There's countless companies that make a living doing precisely this. If it wasn't profitable and they didn't produce results, do you think they'd still be in business? Obviously no. So back in the early 2000s, Google introduced something called the page rank algorithm, which was very novel at the time. Basically, Google looked at how many people pointed to a certain page and then determined how authoritative that source was. Since then, it's become very easy to manipulate results and people will spam search engines, point into certain websites in order to make them appear first in results. So do you not think the pharmaceutical industry with literally hundreds and hundreds of billions and billions of dollars that they would not simply create a website, pay a search engine optimization firm or maybe a few to make sure certain things ranked for some Google in order to promote their products and services. Do you not believe they would be highly, highly incentivized? Make sure everything that it said was used to promote over-priced testing kits, over-priced mass, over-priced poison shots and so forth. It's very easy to manipulate any things, providing you have the right company and a good amount of cash. And remember, just because you may find accurate information on a particular topic doesn't mean all the information on other topics are accurate too and it doesn't mean they're unbiased as well. So can you see how what you find in search engines like Google might not be accurate? So another thing that I hear a lot of people say that believe there's a mysterious virus say that they got sick and it was worse than before. So some people still believe they got more sick than before. Well aside from the fact that if you were a mass, if you did a test, if you participated whatsoever in the stupid nonsense that there were poison on the mass, poison's on the test, poison's in the cleaning solutions, poison and hand sanitizers that could affect your health. In which case I would agree that probably the person did get quite ill from the poison sprayed on all those things but not from some kind of mysterious fires that you can't find. If however, in spite of that, you think you still got sicker than before. What happens when you focus your attention on something? You tend to notice it more. Again, using the yellow shirt example, if you went into a crowd, looked at everybody's shirts, you probably wouldn't notice anything too special. But if you bought that yellow shirt, started looking at everybody's shirt, it would seem that everybody had a yellow shirt. Same crowd, same number of shirts, it's just what you're focusing on. Likewise, ask yourself this honestly. In the past, how often did you actually pay attention to the degree of sickness you felt before? And how did you measure it? Getting sick always feels bad. And it's also highly subjective. Someone who, say, doesn't have to write an exam or it doesn't have to talk to their boss or make a presentation they don't want to, might actually like it getting sick is a really, really good thing. But if, say, someone was going to go on a vacation and that's when they got sick, man, this sickness, oh, it stretched out over the entire vacation, really, really bad, et cetera, et cetera. It's very, very subjective. And now, if you had fear of stress and anxiety and have a belief that it could be deadly, then yeah, it probably would seem a lot worse, even though it's exactly the same thing, something for you to consider. And finally, there's various origin story theories. Basically, if you didn't know this already, in comic books, you almost have what's called an origin story, simply because it makes the comic book a lot more interesting. You want to know where things came from, how it evolved, et cetera, et cetera. So quite simply put, the lab leak, the bat theory, et cetera, et cetera, are all red herrings. They're designed to distract you from what's really going on. They're designed to distract you from what's right in front of your eyes. They're designed to cast out and make you spend your energy worrying about something that you really can't verify for yourself. For example, they, meaning the psychopaths organizing this similar last couple years, they could say, umperlumpas lived in Antarctica. But who cares? What are the chances of you going to Antarctica to see if, in fact, there aren't indeed umperlumpas? They could say there's huge castles made of ice cream in Antarctica. But still, who cares? It's highly unlikely that not only would you have the means to go to Antarctica, but that you would actually go, even if you did, to verify that yourself. And so let's say you did, and you went to prove that there were no castles made of ice cream in Antarctica. What would you do? Tell everyone? Again, who cares? Likewise with the lab leak theory, the bat theory, certain organizations creating this in a lab, blah, blah, blah. They're all designed to distract you. It's not something you can verify for yourself. You're wasting your time and energy getting caught up in something that really doesn't matter. So you can't actually verify yourself. And that's actually simply because the virus doesn't actually exist, never did, still doesn't. The infection is from the injection. But what can you do? You can look at your own personal observations. That's something you can verify. Trust yourself. So anyways, in this first part, basically I've covered most of the things that could have possibly led you to believe that there was a contagious virus. Hopefully, since I've done this deep dive, you now realize and see how your belief system could have been manipulated. And hopefully now you have an open mind to looking at the actual proof and evidence that it actually does not exist and you can proceed further in this video. This isn't the end of part one and I will be releasing part two very shortly.