Gray State - The Rise - Rough Cut Directed by David Crowley

Video Transcript:

There's a window opening. We're going to be going through some of the cases. Look at history, and the knowledge that things like this can happen, things like this can happen, things like this are happening right now. The Great State is a part of this Orwellian nightmare that's Mei's set up. It's a vision for what's next is a global bed and even more power. The potential, complete collapse of America, the global economy. One world government, new world water. It's real, a lot of people are realizing it, and more people are going to happen. You are a slave. The system is failing us, and the bottom line is that something has to be done. This is an empire in decline. If we don't do something drastic to put the federal government in check, we're going to be doing things the hard way with the violent collapse. We are already getting fall to the Great State. We're already halfway there. This is half we're already on. Civil war is staring into space. Friends like the slow yielding of our quiet American towns to a choking array of federal surveillance grids, illegal police checkpoints and literal foreign occupation. That's exactly the kind of abusive power that led to the first American Revolution. What is it that keeps it from happening in the United States? Is this the kind of world I want to live in? The Great State is a symptom. The disease is a state. The morality that we expect ourselves to adhere to, the standards of behavior and conduct. When you were taught in kindergarten, don't get and don't steal, it wasn't unless you're a cop or an IRS agent. When you learned thou shalt not kill, it wasn't unless your dear leader gives you a gun and a badge and a one way to get to the other side of the world. Those were moral absolutes, but what we are doing now is institutionalizing them in government and creating this moral exception for people that have the socially granted monopoly on the initiation of force over a given geographical area by calling it government and pretending that it's good for us. The only thing that makes the government different from any other organization is the government has the ability to compel people to do things via force. You've got to look at that whole idea that it's okay for us to do this, but not for you to do this. They want you to feel defeated, they want you to feel powerless, and that is how they basically get away with rape, theft and murder. It's like massive Stockholm Syndrome. We see it every day, we see it in the news, we see it on headlines, but people still don't acknowledge it. We are already living in a world where government has become a detriment to human liberty by any measure, it's such an obvious level. You're already going into a scientifically designed or well-earned control system that is meant to use humans up like natural resources. The stripping of your rights, your liberties, your freedom, private property, even your free will. That is a great state, and yes, it is real, and yes, it is here. The free enterprise system is based off five features, economic freedom, incentives, competition, voluntary exchange and private property. Basically, we believe as free market economists that people have a right to private property that prices are driven from the market, people that are buying and selling goods and services. Whereas a socialist system doesn't have those features, then you talk more about public property and what can the state control versus what can the individual control. If I buy something from you, it's because I value your product more than my money, and you are going to value that money more than that product. And we both benefit. Any time you introduce force into that equation in any form, you subtract from humanity's potential to reach that ideal of prosperity and progress. You can't force someone by law to buy something, otherwise voluntary exchange doesn't exist. You can see that with Obamacare different mandates for consumers to purchase various goods and services, so that is a progression towards socialism. You're mandated to purchase certain items from the state. Individual people can do much better in bringing up an entire economic society by themselves and not being ordered to do certain things. That's why all command economies essentially fail. That's what they did in Europe. You couldn't keep the benefits of your own labor, your own hard work and sweat. It would be confiscated by some core identity that had control over the monetary system. It would be at a nation of producers. It would be at a nation of people who were free to innovate and create and then be allowed to reap the benefits of that creativity. If you invented the television set, the state's not going to come in and say, we're confiscating that from you. For the public could, you were then allowed to market it, it generated wealth, savings of money. You had more and more local hardware stores competing against each other. When you had greater competition, you had reduction in prices. Obviously, the people who can provide the highest quality product, the lowest price, are going to win out. Those who cannot will fail. That's what a free market is. It's the freedom to succeed and fail. It's a simple fact of the superiority of using persuasions. You get people to do what you want to do, as opposed to saying, well, I'm scared and I don't trust you and I'm going to just have someone with government put a gun to your head and do what I want you to do. When people give money to Bill Gates or Sam Watt, he's not taking it from you. They're getting something in return. They're getting a service, they're getting a product. There is an organization out there that does take the money from you and that's the government. If you live in the United States and you work in the United States, you fall under our jurisdiction. Does that mean that everyone in North America is a slave to your company? I don't work for a company. Are you working for the IRS? Is everyone a slave to the IRS? I believe that I do have jurisdiction. I believe it is valid. I believe I do have those rights. You can't, by your own admission, answer a question regarding evidence that proves that there's jurisdiction. You have an answer, those questions. You have faith that you have jurisdiction. You don't have any actual evidence and you're not qualified to determine if there is evidence to back that discussion up. Correct. The line faith. That's really impressive when you're talking about other people's property and other people's lives. That has blind faith and in a violent aggressive system. You don't have a choice about whether or not you can do business with the government. If you don't want to use our services, that's fine, but you're still going to pay for the services. If you don't have kids, you're still going to pay for public school. If you're not sick, you're still going to pay for healthcare. If you don't pay, we're going to send people with guns to take your money and take your house. Take you. The feudal era, you had a feudal king or lord who would claim half of your props in exchange for protection. And because the peasants didn't know any better, they could get away with that scam. Hey, give me 20 bucks. Well, I'll shoot you. I'll throw you in prison, which is what taxes are. No one pays taxes because they want to. Taxes are collected at the barrel of the gun. All laws are enforced at the barrel of the gun. Now, the facade of stateism has to include them, throwing us a lot of bones. You know, a farmer will provide health care for his livestock in the same way that a government wants to keep the tax cows healthy and productive. They bribe us with our own money. They tax us and they take that money and they push it back out. What they hope we don't notice is they take that money from us in the first place. Without the income tax, America historically became the wealthiest country on earth because it goes back to the benefits of the savings based economy. We're able to accumulate savings and you're not forced to turn it over to a governing authority to redistribute it as it suits you. You have a business. You're supposed to file as your business expense, your business accounts, you know, non-progressive anything else. But you as an individual, there's no law stating that you have to file taxes on your income. Understand that your income tax is a farce. The 16th Amendment of the United States was never properly ratified by Congress. People today believe that taxation is absolutely necessary like Winston Churchill said if the penalty for living in a civil society. This is not true. We lived without an income tax. New Hampshire today still exists without the income tax and they're thriving. They're doing fine. You think it's moral to force people to follow your rules and you think that's moral. You think it's moral to force people to do what you want and to pay you. And we don't believe it's moral to force people on the threshold. I disagree with the word force. I disagree with the word force but I think it's moral that you should have to pay your tax. It's moral to force people to pay for services they may or may not want. Yes, it is moral to pay for things that you may or may not want. So by doing things voluntarily and not using aggressive force and asking questions back to you as a moral but the opposite of being involuntary using aggressive force and not questioning that moral here. One reason why the income tax is so detrimental it's based on the assumption that the government owns everything and they allow us to keep a certain percentage under their conditions. It proves the point that even if one percent income tax is morally wrong because it's so as the scenes of destruction. The gray state is a symptom of the step backwards of stateism that we're experiencing right now. Two steps forward, one step backwards is the course of human progress and I can look back and say well we started the major step backward in 1913 that was the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve legislation was drafted on an island really called Jekyll Island. All these bankers that had the GP work and the other large banks at the time got together on this island secretly drafted the legislation and all that stuff. I think that name is perfect, the creature from Jekyll Island. It's this creature. The Congress was on leave for Christmas at a silent vote, less than 10 votes and actually got through. And all of a sudden the Fed Board of Governors became the all-powerful entity. So what you did was you gave someone a monopoly and then they brought that monopoly into DC. No different than the IMF today. No different than all the corporations and all the guilds, all the unions that are coming to DC to seek their monopoly favors. So basically what it is is that the Federal Reserve is 80% owned privately. You have to print our currency. The picks our interest rates. Tells us how much commodity products are. There's nothing federal about the Federal Reserve. It's a private establishment owned run by ash or banks. The Federal Reserve is a criminal organization. Did you people know that America doesn't even own its own money supply? Within our constitution to be able to print our own money. Congress should have control over it. If I reserve, it took that away. This private central authority is going to loan money to your government at interest so they make money off that debt. And then the Federal government pays them back plus interest to be a taxation. And basically it prints false money. Money out of thin air. I look at as the age old struggle if you floss for stone or you used to try and find a way back in the old days to create gold which was money and always has been money out of lead. And they never can figure out how to do it. So they sort of like the rapture occurred when they realized we can substitute gold with paper money which we can create infinitely at a very low cost. When they want to spend more than they make off the revenue from the people, that's where they borrow money from the Federal Reserve. Basically open at a credit card. So this debt is only valid so far as our public is able to cover that debt based upon more level of income taxes. Federal income taxes is one thing. That's it. When you pay taxes on your income, that goes directly to the Federal Reserve to pay interest on the debt that they created. Anybody not understand that? Anything they cannot pay for the taxation, they turn on the printing presses. At this point it's analogous to a Mickey Mantle rookie baseball card. You give some governing authority the right to create photocop into this, pass them off at the same thing. What's going to happen to the existing value of all other Mickey Mantle signed rookie cards in good condition. Well, they used to be rare so they had value. Now they eliminated demand. They took us off the gold standard. They took us off the oil standard. Oil is now traded in euros and other currencies so there's not much incentive to invest in the United States. And now they're increasing the supply. So you have declining demand and you have greater supply. Many a country has tried this in the past. It ends up badly. You can't just print money and say it's worth something. That's only going to work for so long. What gives our paper its value is its world reserve status. Every currency on earth is back to some degree or some percent by US dollars. What used to give that value was that it was backed by something else in value. In our case we had the highest gold reserves of any country on earth. We had an agreement under Bretton Woods with Saudi Arabia and Opaq, you know, the oil and petroleum exporting nations in the world. That their oil would only be traded exclusively in US dollars. Every other country on earth had to buy US treasuries and convert their currency in US dollars to get oil which every economy needs to function. That was the key to our prosperity in the early days. It's an illusion. It's a mass delusion to say that a northern Ireland pound has intrinsic value. It's only valuable if somebody takes it. And if you go try to spend that down in London nine times out of ten people say I don't want that. That's not real money. That's not a British pound. It's a symbolic representation of an exchange medium. That's the beauty of gold, silver and other commodities. They don't lose their value. It just is what it is. It discourages moral hazard and unnecessary risk. If you couldn't afford it, you didn't buy it. This was not poverty. This was responsibility. So they're funneling all this money that otherwise didn't exist. They're creating it literally a thin air, lonely it to the banks, and they loan it at an interest. You go to a bank and get a loan, they basically transfer that money at a thin air into your account. And it's a debt. But it came out of nowhere. So, technically, that's fraud. Since the 1970s, we did not have the ability to cover our debts via taxation. It's not popular. There's a raised taxes. You're going to vote for the politician who does that because that gets old. But we hate it when they stop spending. We like the free goodies. So, that's why it is. We're in such a deficit crisis and they spend so much money. It's popular to spend. It's unpopular to tax. So, what do we do? We have the Federal Reserve paper over it. The problem is Congress, the Federal bureaucracy, and the military bureaucracies. And remember what runs those things. Cash. When you fly into Ronald Reagan National Airport, as you're getting ready to land, if you look towards the Washington monument, you will see this enormous mountain of cash. The problem with that mountain of cash is it's a magnet for all the wrong people. Everybody in the beltway exists to get their hands on some of that cash. It essentially creates a situation in which everyone is for sale. The end to go back to the Mayor Amstel Rothschild quote, who was founder of the Bank of England, Grammy Control of Renations Currency, a care not only makes it's laws, now they do not directly influence public opinion, laws or anything like that. They do so however indirectly because they control the money so the care not only makes the laws because they can use that money which they can create and perpetuate out of nothing and give it to their preferred representatives and government and help shape the agenda. In every administration, there has been someone or multiple people associated to the Federal Reserve. Is that interesting? Why is that? People in getting into office can borrow money from the Federal Reserve directly for their political campaigns. They necessarily don't have to pay that money back out of their own savings or their own donations. They just laid that as national debt that the United States owes the Federal Reserve. Federal Reserve is happy to create that debt because their dollar created, they get more interest paid back to them. Once they've taken this money from the Federal Reserve, it's like selling your soul to the devil. You don't really have a choice in which bills you pass or which ones you vote no or yes for. Listen, here's in much altruism when you're flooded with cash. That is one very insidious way that the Federal Reserve impacts public policy and they use again these various round table groups as a conduit to accomplish this indirectly. So it doesn't look like the Federal Reserve doing it but that's ultimately what happens. How long have they been trying to do this? Forever. Bikers who like that. If you live and do it, which you need is good to see presidents, could see coverage people to prevent it. Obama's entire cabinet stems from the Federal Reserve. If you don't believe me, look it up. It's a win-win situation for government to spend. It's something that governments never even held accountable for. It's a way of free money for them. The elite uses the banking and financial industries as a mode of control because either you're owned by them or you own money to them. So either way, it's kind of like this leisure control around everybody. Today, if you create an invention, you're much less likely to run a company that employs people for very long because you're going to have a very large bank or a very large corporate entity come in and simply buy your product. It essentially allows them to confiscate the creativity of UNI, of regular people. It allows them to not produce, to not achieve, to not create something of a great value that the public will demand and consume. They didn't have to do that themselves, all they had to do was control the monetary supply. They can then buy up for pennies on the dollar essentially your creation, your innovation and marketing for the masses. And then they can siphon up millions of taxpayer dollars for having produced nothing. As humans were designed to worry about the next tribe coming over and attacking our clan and men are designed to look out towards the horizon and see threats. But we only see military threats or criminal threats for thugs. We have not been designed to see corporate threats where global corporations get their people into government, then the traders in government create new systems and sign government authority over to that. The conspiracy is one of human nature and the money power is using that money to influence to appeal to people's own based instincts and their own self-centeredness. You have to ultimately in a free market, assume the risks and responsibilities associated with the freedom again to succeed and the freedom to fail. We don't have that. We have today as a corporateocracy. You can essentially fail and you don't have to worry because you're getting bailed out by the taxpayer. That's not a free market. We don't have a free market. We have intertwined corporate interests. Right. We have the high drop of these corporations that are addicted to cheap money, regret it, created by a privately owned corporation that monopolizes the greed. The Federal Reserve is going to create Mickey Mantle baseball cards, ad nauseam and infinitum. They're going to just print them out to cover all these bad debts that went wrong when Goldman Sachs Federal Reserve shareholder decided to sell a whole bunch of these securities mortgages, things to the repeal of Glass-Steagall to foreign investors all over the world that went bad and they knew would go bad. The fraud element comes in and knew they were going to go bad. So the Federal Reserve creates more hazard against these large banks by saying don't worry what paper it over. We're in the midst of a serious financial crisis and the federal government is responding with decisive action. Over 700 points. Apple shares are just getting hammered. We're down by between three and four and a half percent. A national rescue plan. 85 billion dollar deal. The worst economic crisis facing the United States. There are going to be ominous consequences. We're in the last days of this country surviving. Supply urgently needed money. So banks and other financial institutions can avoid collapse and resume lending. We bailed out the guys that created this mess and those are the last few. But I just think this should be granted a free pass. Not passing a bill now would cost these Americans much more later. We're going to put a bid in the depression from the rich people. They were going bankrupt and they said they got the bail out and we got the bank by today. People accepted it. They were like yes good. Well at least we have jobs. At least the banks are okay because that's where our money goes. And every time they manufacture a depression in the marketplace, they receive a bail out. Smaller competitors do not so they can buy up the assets. Again the things of tangible actual value from the productive people in the economy and they're confiscating it. I'm pennies in the dollar because when you're liquidating in a chapter 11 bankruptcy situation, you're going to take whatever you can get. Then Goldman Sachs, G.I.P. Morgan, Bank of America, and S.F.R.U.V.M. Take control of all those assets. They didn't produce anything. They didn't make anyone's life better. But they're rolling in the dough, aren't they? The only problem here is that there's an absolute unification of money, power, and government. And you need to try to take a sanity and liberty to try and price those things apart because at the moment they are one. Is this trying to corruption, at least the secrecy and incompetence? It just breeds all this and they just want to keep everything quiet. In the Roman period they used to talk about bread and services as entertainment for quote unquote, come on. Let's increase prosperity and stare at living. Everybody gets to drive a better car. Everybody gets to live in a nicer home. And what we really want people to do is go to the mall and shop and be entertained. They've been very successful in turning the body of the American population into sedated consumers. Well, you can only sedate the consumer so long when the consumer runs out of his ability to consume. When he suddenly wakes up and recognizes that what he thought he had he doesn't. The money he thought he had is gone. The wealthy he was promised is vanished. That's when the game is up. Today, inside Washington, the mainstream mentality is that you and I and the rest of us that are talking in these terms are out of touch with reality. They cannot begin to comprehend what you and I are discussing today. I think that's very important for your viewers to understand. Our banking system is a safe and a sound one. That's the problems of our completely management. Everything will be fine. We'll pass some reforms. It's a new legislation. We'll make it all right. Part of the scam of government by printing money, by borrowing money, we don't have to tax people directly. We can commit intergenerational child abuse and pass that bill off to the people who are unborn. When born into America, have a $45,000 stone around their neck. Is there a share of just the federal debt in its most conservatively estimated forms? People keep throwing around these numbers that were 15 trillion in debt, 16, 17. Those are all old numbers. It came out in Bloomberg financial and other news outlets that under Obama's administration in the first two years, over 23.7 trillion is missing. And those are old numbers and that's on top of all the missing trillion from Bush. You had $1 million and you started counting one at a time. It would take you 11 and a half days to get to $1 million. If you were going to count to a billion, it would take you 31.7 years. And 1 trillion seconds, it's 3,700 years. That's the difference between a million, a trillion and a trillion. So a million seconds ago, I'm going to have to go a billion seconds ago, 1980, a trillion seconds ago, 29,688 B.C. The way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt. Raising the debt ceiling, which has been done over 100 times, does not increase our debt. We have now seen our national debt go to the tune of $211 trillion. If you consider all the government guarantees to workers for their retirements and their pensions, etc. We're at a point now where if you're to tax the American public to the tune of 100% of their income for the next 20 years, you wouldn't put a dent in the interest. And we see the economy falling apart. And before people said, you know, I can't really believe that this is all just by design. How do tens of trillions of dollars go missing? And then Ben Bernanke, the Fed Chairman, just laughs at Congressman Senators when they ask him, hey, where's the missing trillions? Some of the heads who were in charge of the counting said, we just don't know where it went. When everybody struggling in this economy, Ben Bernanke is out celebrating at this huge gala event where all these rich, elite, powerful people. Meanwhile, there's children's starmen. What you do at the 2008 Bill de Burghmeet, I'm not doing any press today. For people in high office and high places, there is no accountability. And they like that. And it's a wonderful situation to be in. Never having to answer for what you've done. So when you print money, you literally expand the gap between rich and poor. We are in debt, our kids are in debt, our grandchildren are in debt. It is time to stop. When the United States defaults on its debt, which it will, to the Federal Reserve. So I'm going to question if, it's a question when. Each citizen has been placed on collateral, which is a social security number. So that means when it defaults on the debt, it's going to go to its collateral, which is you and me. So first of all, when you're born, you're in slay. Look at your identifications. Your name is Alan Capitals. It means you're a corporation that's your serial number, that's your ticket number. Everybody's given one of these when you're born. Okay? That's your pin number, meaning that you're going to pay interest to the Federal Reserve system. You know, as you grow up and get older, because the Federal Reserve borrowers against us as debtors. This proven the fact that you're a number. I want to blame what your father holds the poor, that the politicians that they don't hold on to. I also want to blame what your father holds the poor, that the politicians that they don't hold on to. Can I fight recall back in 2009, I think it was? They said that people with incomes are threats to their agenda. It seems to me that they want to make sure that the people don't have any money to fight back. Even the little crumbs. We have pulled this economy back from the brink. There is no recovery. Everyone is going to feel this, even if they're not feeling it now. The thing that my baseball coach's child taught me the most is that in life you are going to lose. We can't have a side of winners, but not that many college teachers in the world, right? I get up and I work every day for family and generations after me. I just don't know what their lives are going to be like. You know, that's my biggest fear. Are we all going to pay for 50 years? Our deficits are to such degree that when you cannot cover it, the attack station, no one's willing to loan you money anymore. That's what we've been doing. You've been borrowing our way to financial prosperity from foreign central banks. And they won't lend to us anymore because they know mathematically we cannot pay it back to the attack station. Bottom line, that's what this is about. They're just creating money. They're devaluing it and there's no alternatives. The direction we're going in right now is debt and dependency. You understand the principles of the debt super cycle. And eventually that super cycle comes to an end because you can only print and borrow so much money. You've seen the dot-com bubble, you've seen the housing bubble. And if you understand the Austrian school, we're already building that next bubble. The US Treasury bond is the largest bubble out there bigger than the credit card and the education bubble. It's several times bigger and they're going to discover this unfortunate fact very painfully. And what happens then in times of economic crises is you go back to the world reserve currency, you buy up US Treasury bills because it's a store of value. What's happening today is you're seeing that panic to fight to save the end of the US dollar. But dollars not going up in value. It's still very gradually going down and down. All that's going to take for us to crumble financially is for the world leaders to drop the dollar. They can dump that on a market at any time. Create overnight hyperinflation. It means all commerce shuts down. Well, if you know that in six months, your dollars are going to lose 20% of value. You're not going to hold on to and save them, which is what we depend upon. You're sure as hell not going to back your currency by them. You're going to buy shit up while the buying's good. You see it now? You got China out, buying up infrastructure all over the United States, Russia, doing the same thing. So they're taking this worthless US dollars and they're buying up this country. And then there'll be a flight to safety and commodities, gold, silver, et cetera to save what you have left. So essentially at some point, all of the world's banks are going to dump dollars. And those dollars are going to start chasing goods and services. And as the means of production becomes more and more handicapped by government intervention, more and more regulation, less people are going to invest. The whole thing falls apart. Now, look at the news. You see this is happening right now. The smartest minds in the world are saying these bonds are cooked. We've added the rally is over. They're long awaited bond buckleups. It's happening. And I think it is happening in the next month, two, month, three months. It's happening now. So what is real wealth? Is it in a paper currency again? No, that's just paper. It's kindling. It's something to write on. It's something to wipe your backside with. What does that paper get you? Goods and services. What does a bank confiscate? Do they come after your paper? No, they come after your house. They come after your cars. They come after the actual goods and services that had the value to begin with. That's why everyone who's inside the beltways, so desperate to convince everyone, it won't happen. Because there is no way to avoid it anymore. The economy is going to be okay. Keep them working because you don't want to create pandemonium. It's like getting people too scared about what's going on. It's like getting the government. They're going to have a revolution. They can't have that. They want to keep it on the tipping point where they have control. They're going to use our own money to enslave us and collapse the monetary system at the same time. Because again, every currency on earth is backed by US dollars. If there's nothing to replace it, you only have chaos. In June of 1929, Mr. Melon, who was the Secretary of the Treasury, told the American people that they lived in an area of the US. They told the American people that they lived in an area of unbroken prosperity. That they had nothing to fear. At the same time, he was liquidating all of his investments in the market. He was putting everything into cash and gold. He wasn't alone. Mr. Geithner recently made the statement that our banks are solvent. That there is no issue. We have nothing to be concerned about. Nothing could be further from the truth. The whole idea about conditioning the kids is the idea of creating a new generation that thinks differently than the previous generation. They should teach the kids that they should think a certain way or they should feel a certain way or they should vote a certain way. In the late 1800s, you have the emergence of psychology, the study of psychology, how people think and how people can specifically be manipulated. If you're familiar with the psychology of BF Skinner, what he would have you believe is that human beings are not creatures of introspection. They're not creatures of internal cognition. They have no soul. They have no bot processes. They have no free will. What they are animals to be trained. So you have Skinner's operative conditioning chamber or the Skinner box where he trains mice to perform for him based on a system of punishment and reward. Essentially what it does is it bypasses brain function and goes straight to an animal training method. You create a problem, offer solution that drives them toward a pre-designed response. This is called the Higalian Dialectic. The Higalian Dialectic is a formula and a strategy for creating a problem to then offer a solution that you have to the very problem that you've created to get the outcome that you desire that you want to be. It wouldn't have been able to get if you didn't create the problem in the first place. Jewelies. Jewelies. The Higalian social theory was adopted by Lenin by Marx and was applied politically in the form of communism and socialism. A German psychologist Wilhelm Wnt. He is the first one to apply it to education. For 85% of the American population, what is school supposed to do provide a path to employment and good citizenship? Jewelies. I'm going to go into a lot of great depth and detail in the council of foreign relations. But you're looking at an organization essentially set up by Rockefeller and other central bankers, people who are responsible for the creation of the Federal Reserve to debate education policy in the United States. It used to be that education was run by the states. Today you have funding and financing taking place with the federal government or by a public schooling system who don't do what they want. They get their funding cut. The Reese Foundation, the Ford Foundation, Carnegie Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. All these major foundations that can actually give American taxpayer subsidized grants to individuals who do things according to their criteria. A tax credit is when you get to keep your money because of some reason. A subsidy is when I the government actually collect that money and then I turn around and pick a certain behavior that I want and then I subsidize that. This was revealed in the book Lines of Credit Roops of Bondage in which HR Gaythra of the Ford Foundation revealed to Norman Dodd of the Reese Foundation that they were taking their directives from the White House. The American education system is a combination of the Gillian social theory and experimental psychology. They destroy things like competition between students because if they tell you there's no competition, there's no reason to exceed. There's no reason to excel. There's no incentive for upward mobility that's animal training for the workforce. So you have to attack the families that say parents are fed to be parents. So the state has to come and control that and then you have to control what the children are eating and what they're being fed. I mean what they're being taught and what they're watching because you have to begin to set up the generation gaps. And that's the whole idea behind working with the kids and dealing with our kids. This concept of the local parenthesis that the school is the parents when the parents are not there. Most people are too busy working the 9-5 and now that 9-5 is turning into 9-9 to be able to provide triple in the amount of time we have to transfer knowledge and information to our children or young. So by making sure both parents are away from the children at work, they can guarantee that the social environment of school, preschool, daycare is going to be able to give the children the knowledge they're having. And what you have is the degradation of the individual, you have the promotion of the states and you have the elimination of the middle class. Now under this operant conditioning from Skinner and under a system of reward and punishment, the only thing you learn is how not to get punished and how to achieve your reward. You're not going to come away from the system thinking I'm going to stand up for something because it's right. You're going to do it because there's either reward or consequence involved. They're being trained to enter the workforce as a valueless cog in the state. Jewelbeats. Jewelbeats. I'm a product of the public school system and nobody ever taught me anything. I mean, I think we read the Declaration of Independence in the 5th grade possibly. But I think the school systems are designed to keep people uninformed and to not understand the scope of their rights and where they come from. I think the powers would ultimately love everyone to believe that their rights come from the state. It takes about 20 years for this sort of system of thought to instill itself in a generation unchecked by traditional values. What you see is the same system employed by Stalin and basically this is being done in America right now. We're developing them to not question authority. We're developing them to be entitled. But the government will take care of them from cradle to grave. These efforts have been pretty successful. No one questions their shackles that they're going into them. Jewelbeats. Jewelbeats. We have hold generations of kids that are being raised. Do not think like free people. To think like slaves. To think like they don't have self-determination. The state's goal is to get your children to turn against you in the name of a state. And that's where we are shifting now. We are shifting from an individualistic paradigm to group thick. They want to be led. They want to be sheep. They want to be part of the masses. Critical reason, critical thought, individualism. I mean those are huge concepts. I mean they're universal concepts. But to be able to control the masses you have to get rid of that. Because if you don't you can't control those people. It's the alleviation of personal responsibility because the experts are in control. Let them handle it. amount of them.ạ lot of trends. I'm on grins day, you're on day! Parties shouldn't exist. We ought to be voting for candidates upon principles, character, things like that. It keeps us from being able to fight over party lines. If you look today, you have party platforms. These are things that we all have to agree on. And if not, you are not a part of this party. We'll look at Ron Paul right now. He's against taxation. A lot of people in the GOP. We like that. But he's against the war as well. You must be one of those Democrats then. The old saying, dividing conquerors. They try to just divide people into two different groups. You can't unify. It's easier to manage a population when you have two primary belief systems. You're either A or U B. These people are conditioned to think a certain way and support a certain team. They pick their winning team where they're going to cry Republican. And then that's their guy. And it doesn't matter what that person votes for. As long as they're guy wins, they put their pinnup. They're just going to donkey or elephant on it. And they wave it. And say, my guy won. Things are going to be different. It's so much easier to lie to the masses when the masses aren't involved. There's no better way to discourage masses from getting involved. And by creating convoluted, controlled dialogue based upon party platforms versus individual principle. They'll say how the one core of their mouth they want even both wants you to participate. And then they notice statistically that there's less participation today than there ever has been. And that's exactly the way they want it. It's all feters. It's just political feters. They're from rule based on constitutes on law. To rule based on cultural personality. Well, he might be wrong, but he's my president. So I'm going to stand with him. That's a very dangerous motor thinking. You support freedom in the American Constitution. You support this person. We've all seen where that led. Can't believe it. I'm sure I've been dreaming. He's pushing Cheney. Everybody's got him. Obey the laws. Including the president, vice president. The work for Democrats. Obama, yeah. Woo! I'm sure you've asked the average of us who are good intentions or not. And of course, the path to hell is paid with good intentions. You know, Obama's just as bad as the rest of them. Why do you say that? What's he done? He's one of the most war-hungry presidents we've ever seen. He is not fulfilled any of his policies that he promised at all. The economy is still tamed. The taxes are still high. I'll make our government open and transparent. One of my priorities as president is opening up the White House to be American. That White House toward the New Cancel till further notice. I intend to close Montenegro and I will follow through on that. We will bring it into this war. I will be held accountable. These are bills that Congress ran up. You will not see your taxes increased once in the land. Cut the deficit. We inherited by half. If I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a one-term proposition. If you had a spouse who broke their promise, a green B5 percent of the time, you'd get it to force. This is all fat. But people still support him. Obama's name is in the Bible. I prayed and I believed that God kicked the right person. The Obama noise. The Obama noise. You're going to have 20 to 25 percent. The American public will always support Obama no matter what he does because their own ego is on the line and they won't admit it. Actually, there was a lot of facts. What you just stated, those were the facts. Everybody's happy to re-elect President Obama. Yeah! What's your favorite thing about President Obama? I could list a million different reasons. It's true for him. We support public education and he wants to restore it back to where it belongs. Yes, everybody in Cleveland knows my name. He got Obama's phone. Keep Obama in president. You know, he gave us a phone. Oh, okay. Okay, yeah. His public speech speaking skills are immaculate. He's so smart. He was funny and he's captivated. He was. He was. He was. He understood where we come from as individuals. He's definitely for the people. Obama is my boy, and he just knows what to do. Obama, Obama. Let's go. I'm party. Let's go. Oh my god! Give me a hundred reasons. Give me a three. Three main reasons. First of all, Obama is ensuring that... Well, the American people will be the completionists of the election. In the last several decades, they've enjoyed unparalleled prosperity. And let's face it, the average American on the street, he's not interested in what's happening in Kuwait. He could care less about living or something else. And so if you're telling, well listen, we're bombing for democracy. Goodness, freedom, human rights. So he's okay. It doesn't affect him. He doesn't have to go. Children don't have to go. There doesn't appear to be any risk to him. That's changing. He's not everything bushed it, but more. Oh, I don't agree with that. Well, he had to continue what was started. You can't just say, okay, we're done. Well, sure he didn't end the wars, but there are wars now, so we're in support of it. And oh, well, sure he hasn't completely pulled out of Iraq, but at least he's reducing the number of troops there. Oh, so it's diet tyranny. It's tyranny like now. There's a lot of other reasons why I'm going to vote for Obama and hearing that stuff honestly doesn't change it. For the greater good, most of the policy he's put in place, I agree. He's challenging the status quo. What is the status quo? Let's see. Oh, Obama's going to take us forward. The president and the first lady are kind of like the model of the Dan of the country. And when your dad says so, you listen. I pledge to be a servant to our president. And all mankind. Because together we can, together we are. And together we will destroy relationships with their families when they realize that their neocon uncle and their liberal cousin weren't just well intentioned that they were creating a justification for coercive government in ideology that they were externalizing their own desires to control others. And that was reflected in those relationships. It always is. I mean, the evil person or evil group of people are ever acknowledging that what they're doing is evil. I'm not an on-violence. Yes, so much. No, you're an Obama supporter. You think he wants to kill people with drone strikes? Well, then what did he want to do? He orders it done. So I would have thought. All right, you're out of your mind. People are aware of the truth. People choose not to accept the truth. There's a difference with this. People who are completely unaware of the truth, those are becoming few. It's self deception. How can you be honest in a political debate or any other contest if you're deceiving yourself first? But people who will just do what the party wants and do what they're told and build the way they're told and they just keep voting for the machine. After a certain point, there's no more deniability. They can't say I didn't know or write it or stand. On their hands, except dropping in from their goal, that if they came from the Soviet Union, they would flat that. They could have come from the North and they'd get down and work. They both are looking for ways to bend the problem. You can find people all over that will say that we should end the war. But they have a lot of trouble saying that when they meet a soldier. It was actually my older brother who we talked about joining. We had a lot of conversations about the bravado of the current US military forces, the attitude. If you ever go into the military, it's definitely about psychological conditioning. It's the idea that when life and death is on the line, you cannot afford to believe anything but the fact that you are the biggest baddest force on the face of the earth. It's like I said, you know, you have to watch the valley, the shadow of death. I shall fear no evil, come from the evil smother fuckers of the valley. Get out of the way! Get out of the way! War is like a big video game that I can watch and watch TV. And it's like a fool to see all the world's flags all over the world. Showing how the odds are taken. They want you to believe that they're taking it to the end of the season. If you don't support it, you don't support the truth. Oh damn it, no other day. So we condition them and we convince them that their cause is just and that their enemy is subhuman and not worthy of living. And the American people, honestly, play a role in that. They come back and the reception they receive is just astounding. I'm giving tax breaks for being a veteran. I'm giving discounts on my car insurance. I can go to the commissary, you know, tax-free groceries. I get all the benefits I could ever want in the military. Why would I question that? We have soldiers who are coming home. We have a lot of people who are going to be in the military. We have a lot of people who are going to be in the military. We have a lot of people who are going to be in the military. We have a lot of people who are going to be in the military. We have soldiers who are coming home and they look at all this. And they say, well, it seems like that was wrong. But how could I admit that that was wrong? You'll never know we go through for your freedoms. But at no point does anyone question how are they defending our freedoms by invading a foreign country? Well, you didn't serve. You don't know. Well, then what happens when a guy like Jesse Finchura who now only served but served in the seals? He comes out and he speaks and he says the same thing. Oh, he served but. There is nobody. He served. He knows he's been there. I was over in the Persian Gulf getting ready to liberate Kuwait, which is a kingdom and dictatorship. And here I am liberating their oil assets from Iraq. I thought I was doing the right thing too. And it's really hard to look back on that and say, you know, that military conflict that I was in, that my friends died in, that I got shot at in, that I have nightmares about. I guess that really shouldn't have never happened. And unfortunately, the media has worked tirelessly to ensure that this truth doesn't reach the American people. In the past, we had the media to watch the government and keep them in line and ask the tough questions. You all remember those clips in the old days, the black and white, and you can see the news guys with the Fedoras. Yeah, they'd always go up and they'd be in people's face with the big flash bulbs. You know, Senator, this happened to happen. You know, you hear, you know, politicians being held accountable. And they're always being asked questions and you don't see it anymore. Leaders have found a way to call the police. And they're not going to be the police. And they're not going to be the police. And they're not going to be the police. They're always being asked questions and you don't see it anymore. Leaders have found a way to call the masses into their own ideal sense. And whether that's through bread and circus, such as the Roman Empire, or today through the mainstream media, they get to decide that, yes, you're going to be obsessed with American Idol for over a decade. And when that starts to wane, you know, we'll come up with dancing with the stars. And let's really be concerned about who wins the Super Bowl. Three keys to power are banking the media and politics. If you own the banks, you can buy the media, you can buy the politicians. You own the media, you can control what people see, what people think. You can largely shape the culture, you can create and shape people's fears, people's desires, the perceptions that they have of events. In high definition. Here's Morgan, live. This is an BBC news. In 1975, there was a Senate investigation committee called the Church hearings, which actually uncovered that the CIA was paying under the table mainstream media outlets $250 million a year to act as gatekeepers and propagandists. In today's terms, that's $1 billion a year. Of course, they say they don't do that anymore, but it's foolish to think that they don't. What do you think the top story is the top story on all major networks? Probably Cameron, you know, he'll say he's straight up, I can't answer anything unless it comes from my editors. I can't unless I've got it approved for media relations. I can only talk it through to my own camera. All right, what do you talk about Building Seven? Talk about Building Seven. Help educate the public. If you get video of Sarah Palin or get a sound bite from her, bring that back to us. You can hold the Ron Paul stuff. We sing aloud something that the media likes to talk about such as the Trayvon Martin or you. But we don't talk about the much more serious events that are already well underway. What was the last time you saw images of cascades coming out of airplanes, you never do. So that's never in the mind frame. It's this happened now, Paris Hilton fucks somebody else. Well let's spend two weeks on that. Two, two, one. Can't say that this is a newsworthy, obviously there is a blackout in the trash. The mainstream media though, wants to stay in business. And if they suddenly discover that the people listening to them don't want that message, they're not interested in listening to it. They'll change their tune. A lot of them are doing solid investigative journalism. Watergate. People were hella accountable. People were fired. People were demoted. People were dealt with. There were prison sentences handed out. At least there was the illusion of some kind of accountability back then. The Obama administration, it was caught red handed, supplying weapons to the Mexican cartel. Why does CIA want certain cartel wiped out, protecting their own drug interests? What happened? Nothing. The American citizenry now, like you've said, fast and furious. They've done a great job. We just don't give a shit. First of all, I think the nation gives us too much information because anything you and I can watch on television or enemies can watch really. It's better to not say too much. Don't worry about it. You know, go back to sleep. It's amazing. The mainstream media can actually do its job. It doesn't matter. The American public is now in a state of apathy. Almost a state of numbness. And that's what I see is like this is an entire country of people who are turning against the truth. The President The President The President The President The President The President The President The President Well, what are we developing the kids to do? We're developing them to not question a thought. We're developing them to be entitled. The government will take care of them from cradle to grave. You don't have parental rights anymore. Not just it takes a goal to raise the child, but the village is now raising your child. When we condition the kids, what do we condition the kids to do? We don't always share. Always work in teams. See that table over there? We have 60% right? We always put four toys there. Not six, four toys. Because these kids have the nerve to have a share. And that's a good lesson on some love. But what we don't teach the kids is that it's okay to keep the fruit cereal labor. It's okay to work hard and earn and benefit from that. I think about wealth as wealth is not a zero-sum game. There is wealth out there for everybody. All you have to do is be willing to work hard and earn it. The prevailing attitude in America today is almost that you should be ashamed to be successful. You should be ashamed to be rich. And that if you are rich, the assumption is that you got rich by taking from some of you. You will not find your justice in capitalism. You will not find your justice in the colonial government of the United States. You will find justice when the institution of capitalism and colonialism are destroyed. And they are replaced by sustainable ways of being that capture and protect you. All right. Now we have to say, All right, here was this sacrifice movement. Yeah. What are they doing? This challenge. People with a lot of capital want to make profit. We don't have to look at it. I might know it. Who rich, the key to it and rich and the poor man, the only one who has a rich man. That's funny. He knows. He knows. And while he keeps giving away the world, why do we keep giving away the world? Why do we keep giving away the world? We want their dirty, dirty, free. I'm talking about underwear. One, two, three, two, one, two, three, two, three, two, three, two, one. Now we have to give you all the money. Let's give three. Down on the air. My interpretation is that a lot of people have had some hard months alive. That want things to be free. More entitlements. What people are calling for an Occupy Wall Street is like, Well, Goddamn it, government, you need to do something. This is why we're losing all of our rights to too many people that are being dependent upon the system. We want to get all the free stuff. Where is my free stuff back? Nobody wants to hear this, do that. Get him my school, paper, get him my red paper, my food paper, and if you want we to be good at things. I won't put this damn right down once you all turn our country into a socialist society and take away my right speak. Choose to be complacent and ignorant, and that's fine as you're right too. This is how you disperse a protest group. We have to ask a couple basic questions. The first basic question, what should a role of government be? Should a role of government be there to run the entitlement system? Should we believe this story that entitlements are rights? Yes, there's always an appetite for big government. There's always this temptation of getting something for free. And there's always the motivation where we'll help the poor people. You want to give free food, free medical care, free education, free houses, and everything will be okay. The law at the core of collectivism is that it is all for the good of the collective. Once they get you to swallow that lot, any other lie they tell in service to that, there's not a lot. Or well, nailed it, freedom is slavery. And a lot of the people out there are an activism or embracing big government. They think that big government should be used for our benefit, that they can use it for our benefit, and the argument being that you can't. That kind of control central power. That's too much control for anyone group. Finally, we see that we're going to give you something for free. And we're going to see that we didn't get their permission to pay. We didn't get the bill to steal it from the individual. We don't have a right to their neighbors' wealth. We can't wait to steal it from their neighbor. We should have the right to send it to a politician or a congressman to go into your neighbor's house and think what they have. We're going to be wanted. They're saying that if you have more personal wealth than we think is necessary, then we're going to take some of that from you, and we're going to give it to people that don't have any personal wealth. I'm a warrior for the middle class. I mean, I do think at a certain point you've made enough money. But those who grab the moral high ground and say that we're going to take care of the poor, what do they do? Well, fairism and inflationism and socialism, they produce the poor. It's not in the best interest of the people that run welfare programs to get people off welfare. Their funding is based on the number of clients they have. Well, if they get a client off welfare, they get a client a job, then they lose that client. They lose that client's money. Because you've got to remember, it's a skimming game. If every dollar that it goes to a person on welfare, $10 is used to support that system. All these entitlement programs, they'll go on forever if you let them be courts. They will encourage people to become entitled. Well, I can work for minimum wage, or I can just quit my job and go on welfare if I have kids. Well, welfare is a better deal because they still get the money and I don't have to work. War on poverty, are you kidding me? 47 years ago, and now we have 47 million Americans on food stamps in this country. So for 47 years, we fought this war, bankrupted ourselves, and now won. We have cultivated this large underclass that has made itself dependent upon government and government has encouraged that. We've got to lead, love, to create a nanny state. Because then you'll go along with their plan. You're not going to bite the hand that feeds you. But then the people who are getting the entitlement, well, what are they going to do? Well, they're going to vote for the people that continue the entitlement. We're saying to these people, you can't support yourself, we'll just support you. You've got to support us when the time comes. We have historically been a bottom-up society. We're not a top-down society. You can't make someone equal economically to someone else by giving them something. Are you going to hear Mr. Obama talking those terms? No, Mr. Obama says everyone gets everything for nothing in perpetuity. Don't worry, we'll print money, don't worry, we'll do whatever is required. You can all be permanently dependent upon us, and that's a good thing. Honestly, it's almost like slavery. There's no personal freedom without economic freedom. If you don't have the means to earn money to support yourself, then you're going to be dependent on the government, for food, for clothing, for shelter, for everything you need to stay alive. Because after all, look up the definition of the dictionary in slavery. It's ultimately boiled down to one word, dependence. If you are dependent upon anything other than yourself to provide for yourself, you are a slave. I don't have the word I couldn't guess on my car. I don't have the word I couldn't get my lawyer. If I help you, I'm going to help you. The idea of self-reliance is gone. The idea of independence and individual freedom, and the respect for private property, all of these things is gone. No, no, no, no, we can confiscate wealth from people that created, and give it to those who have none, and that will fix things. We've transferred 16 trillion in wealth since 1965 to the so-called underclass. The only thing the underclass has done is get bigger. They want that cradle to grave care from the government, and they want the government to use force and violence against people who are opposed to it. Well, I obviously believe that my ideas are persuasive, nothing beneficial enough to society that people should subscribe to them, but frankly, some people don't. And at the end of the day, you will use force against those people. I believe that it's the role of the government to use force. So you won't do it yourself. You'll hire someone else to do it, basically. That's what a government is. The reasons people do violence, if you look at the psychological underpinning, it's fear and security, and the desire to survive. So we turn to violence when we're not securing those things, when we're not securing our own sense of self, and our own ability to thrive. That's why government propaganda is always fear-based. It's difficult for me to think that if we lose our economic freedoms, we become, dependant on the government for our basic needs. The next step is we lose our personal freedoms, because then starvation becomes a weapon. Now, if the food stops, if the free services stop, and I think that could easily happen, because I think this whole giant federal edifice could go under, then you're going to have problems in many of these urban areas. In fact, you've already got them in the form of these flashbabs. We see gang members who are committing welfare fraud, and they are killing middle-class people who work for a living and pay taxes. These folks, they're not going to support this welfare state, but the people who use support there for a state, well, they're going to go up and kill their political opponents. We're already seeing this. This has already begun. It's just not covered in the media. We don't talk about it. We're in a beautiful example, a little power in our government, and then we have an action, productivity, and maximum wealth. But today, we think too much of the wealth, and believe that government provides this breadth of an understanding that wealth and prosperity comes from freedom and productivity and not from the government. When we had a freer market and sounder money and limited government, the middle class in this country was the largest middle class in the history of the world, and it was the wealthiest middle class in the world. Madison said it very well. The purpose of government is to protect the unequal distribution of wealth. Mr. Obama wants to destroy that unequal distribution, forcibly. Personal responsibility, self-sufficiency, independence, all these things. You can't have that without recognized individualism. Individualism is now being demonized. You're selfish of your individual. You need to be thinking about the whole, the needs of the whole. Well, of course we do. We all do. And we discussed 250 plus years ago that the best way to go about this is by securing individual rights. But you can use the needs of the whole as justification for all manner of tyranny. If you're looking for a leader, you're going to get a master and you'll fucking deserve one. The most ancient, divine impulse remained to this day, the front of it. The legalists, as they were called, they were chiefly the people in the governing class just as they are today. And we were called a totalitarian who believed that every aspect of our lives should be dictated and ruled and pushed around by government. Instead of a political continuum being a line from left to right, it was really a circle. And that all political systems had to be judged by the amount of bodies that they stacked up. At the bottom of the circle, cheek by gel, was communism, not seism. Moving up the scale, you had socialism, fascism. All of the various collectivisms is subordinate the individual. And at the top was the constitutional republic of the United States. Free man, free markets, rule of law, ordered liberty. What the Chinese used to ca