JIM FETZER "The Raw Deal" (3-1-20) free-wheeling discussion of domestic politics, SC primary

Video Transcript:

When you attend a funeral, it is sad to think that sooner or later those you love will do the same for you. And you may have thought it's tragic not to mention other adjectives to think of all the we think they will do, but don't you worry. No more ashes, no more sackcloth, and an arm band made a black cloth. Will someday never more adorn your sleeve, or if the bomb that drops on you gets your friends and neighbors too. There'll be nobody left behind to grieve, and we will all go together when we go. What a comforting fact that is to know, universe, so the reason is that it's firing achievement. Yes, we all will go together when we go. We will all go together when we go. All that used with an incantation blow, no one will have the endurance to collect, not get insurance. Voice of London will be loaded when they go. This is Jim Fetzer, you host on the real, the raw deal where I mistakenly did not send a reminder to my invited guest tonight, and while I have now sent him both a call in number. In a Zoom link to join me in doing a video version of the show, I'm not at all sure he will have it in time. So I'm going to cover a number of recent political developments and then go open the lines for callers earlier than normal as a consequence. So we can address some of these issues. I want to begin with the South Carolina primary of yesterday. Here's a piece that appeared in readers supported view by Mark Ash who's the editor in chief Joe Biden finally won a primary in the heart of Dixie. With what some there is a backdrop, the place where the session first reared its ugly head. South Carolina was the first state to succeed embrace an old white man from neighboring Delaware. It's of a slavery state and set the stage for Joe Biden to carry the Confederacy. Biden has had little success with that in democratic strongholds as far. But South Carolina held the promise of a revival with its old school southern perspectives and contempt for northern intellectualists mind you. He's offering an interpretation of what happened here for which I'm going to offer a completely different account. South Carolina might matter to the Democrats in a presidential election year if it were not dead red and there were no plausible scenario in which it might be in play in November's general election. The cable news talking heads want to depict Biden's win as a product of black voter enthusiasm. But black voters in the deep south, he was much to the right side of the political spectrum is their white neighbors. He will vote for the Democrat in the general election if inspired. But they traditionally are more than happy to get on board with more conservative, incorporate friendly establish with candidates during the primary season. Now the reason why this is very interesting is it took Joe Biden 32 years and three presidential campaigns to win one primary. The question becomes why after all these years, all these campaigns should have happened now. I'm giving you Mark Ash's interpretation that I'll turn to mine. Ash continues Jim Clyburn, Democratic Party boss. Jim Clyburn along with his future wife Emily embarked on his path to become a civil rights movement icon with organizing efforts starting as early as age 12. When he and Emily were arrested in 1960, they were detained longer, being earmarked as leaders. Clyburn would indeed gravitate to leadership. It was, however, curious to see Clyburn reject and derive Senator Bernie Sanders, the candidate leading the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, as too liberal and too likely to lose. Sanders and Clyburn have something in common. Clyburn's arrest was what John Lewis likes to call good trouble, necessary trouble. Lewis would know he nearly lost his life on the Edmund Pettus bridge, marching for black voting rights. Clyburn was arrested while organizing for the rights of black people about three years later in 1963. So was Bernie Sanders. Sanders was arrested while organizing against racist Chicago police policies while at the University of Chicago. You would think that Clyburn held some sense of camaraderie with Sanders. That's obviously not vacates. Why? Bernie Sanders' revolution is largely intended to do what FDR did in the 1930s. Take on the corrupt and powerful interests, dominating the political process in the United States. That necessarily includes getting between the politicians and the money. That's not something that elected officials, Republicans or Democrats, appreciate. Jim Clyburn is Democrats' house majority whip. It's the job of the whip to whip the votes and voters in the line. It's something he does very well on the part of Democratic leadership in Congress. It worked this time in Dixie. We'll see if the blue states are moved. Meanwhile, there's so much going on with Biden that is so adverse that in my judgment it requires an explanation as to why he should have been a president. Why he should have won. I have a blog now. It's my most recent entitled simple proof. Google manipulated South Carolina primary for Joe Biden. Not only did Joe Biden declare he would appoint the first African American woman to the US Senate. When one of the two who have already been elected, Senator Kamala Harris of California was campaigning against him for the Democratic nomination. But senators are not appointed by the president. In other words, he didn't just blow it by talking about the first Democratic African American senator. He blew it by suggesting he as president would have the authority to appoint when senators are elected by the state. What this means is Joe Biden is seriously, cognitively, impaired. His own has been rife with gaps, including the claim that 150 million Americans have died from gun violence since 2007, which would be half the US population of around 330 million. But that he himself was a candidate for the US Senate. He's running for the presidency and he's describing himself as a candidate for the US Senate. And that he worked on the 2016 Paris Climate Accord with Chinese leader, Ding Zai Pint, who died more than 20 years ago. I am looking forward to appointing the first African American woman to the United States Senate by the 77, set in a step peach and sumpter South Carolina, prompting cheers from supporters, Biden appeared to ignore that Senator Carol Mosley Brown from Illinois served as the first black female senator from 1993 to 1999. While Senator Kamala Harris, the California was the second black woman to be elected to the upper chamber in 2017. Kamala, of course, is not actually African American. She's from the Caribbean. But this is Biden now going on, you know, talking more. When you get knocked down, get up and everyone's entitled to be treated with dignity, no matter what, no matter who they are Biden said during this week's democratic presidential primary debate in Charleston. Also that everyone should be represented. No one is better than me and I'm no better than everyone else. We talked about the Supreme Court. I'm looking forward to make sure there's a black woman on the Supreme Court to make sure we, in fact, get everyone, represent it. The former vice president had it. It's unclear whether he makes up the Senate and Supreme Court in this Friday remarks, in other words, he could have meant to be talking about the Supreme Court and instead spoke of the Senate. The Finance Confusing Comment was one of a series of gaps in recent days as the floundery White House candidate seeks to win Saturday, South Carolina primary contest. The former vice president falsely claimed that this week's debate 150 million Americans died from gun violence since 2007. Several government data shows roughly 156,000 have died of firearm related homicide. So, you know, maybe he's simply got thousands and millions mixed up on Monday. Biden mistakenly proclaimed that he is a candidate for the United States Senate when he's running for the presidency and that people could vote for the other Biden if they prefer one of his White House rivals. Later that day, Paul Siklandy worked on the 2016 press climate, according with former Chinese leader Dems I Ping, who's died over, been dead over 20 years. Been dead for over 20 years. Now, look at the results. These were rather staggering with 100% reporting. Biden got 255,662 votes for 48.4%, nearly 50%. Bernie. 105,770 for 19.9. Steyer. 59,815 for 11.3. Pete Mooda-Gig. 43,484 for 8.2. Elizabeth Warren. 37,285 for 7.1. While other candidates got votes, these are the ones of importance. Now, Bernie got approximately 20% in Biden, virtually 50%. That's a 30 point gap. Now, I went back because all this looked very fishy to me. I went back and checked in face-to-nation just last Sunday, not today. But on February 23rd, and a poll in South Carolina, Biden's lead narrows with Sanders and Steyer on his heels. And just on that day, that Sunday, less than a week before the vote, the primary yesterday, here's how things stood. Biden, 28%, Sanders, 23%, Steyer, 18%, Warren, 12, Booda-Gig, 10, Co-Bitcher, 4. Notice, 28, 23. That's a five point difference between Biden and Sanders, and this is like a week in advance of the primary. So what the world happened? They also reported on that same show, and I've included all this data I'm presenting here on my blog at JamesFensor.org. First choice for Democratic nominee among South Carolina, Black Primary Vulner's first choice for Democratic nominee by 35%. Steyer, 34%, Sanders, 23%. Now, Steyer might well have expected to do better, though he's actually showing here better among Black community than overall, because the non-Black community was supporting Bernie and Biden over Steyer. But get this, and this is extremely significant. The also reported the trend from November last till now, Biden dropped from 54 to 35%, in other words, Biden dropped about 20 points. He was on a downward trajectory, a downward trajectory between November and the last Sunday a week ago. He had come down by 20 points, only 35. Steyer, on the other hand, had risen from only 2% in November to 24%, 24% last Sunday. Sanders, he'd risen from 17 to 23%, among Black primary of voters. So, what the world happened? How could he come from a 5-point lead to a 20-point lead? I mean, this is really stunning stuff. Actually, 30. I mean, 5 to 30. That's 6 times the amount of lead. That's absolutely staggering. I'm telling you, no statistician would endorse the idea that Biden had gone from a 23% lead up to 28 to 23, a week ago, 28 to 23 to nearly 50 to 20. I mean, that's just ridiculous. This is statistically massively anomalous. What it implies is that there was a hidden variable. There was an additional factor in intervening variable that made a difference here. And when I contemplate the situation, I'm reminded of the testimony I've reported here by Robert Epstein to Congress late last year, very, very significant. Here's a bit about Epstein, what you'd find in Wikipedia about him, for example. Robert Epstein born June 19, 1953, is an American psychologist, well, faster author and journalist. He earned his PhD in psychology at Harvard University in 1981. Was that at her in chief of psychology today? A visiting scholar at the University of California, San Diego, and the founder and director emeritus of the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Sciences in Concord, Massachusetts, let me say. They put out a journal that has proven to be a complete success, actually, one of the most fascinating journals in the world, where they have a target article for each issue and then invite dozens and dozens of experts to comment on the targeted article. I was invited and participated several times. And if Epstein ends up to do it, then I'm telling you, it was a really creative innovation and journalism. Epstein has been a commentator for a national public radio's marketplace, a voice of America and Disney on wine. His popular writings have appeared in readers' digest, The Washington Post, The Sunday Times of London, Goodhousekeeping, Parenting and other magazines and newspapers, an autobiographical essay documenting his long involvement with a media was published in 2006 in the academic journal perspectives on psychological science. So why is Epstein so terribly important here? Well, last July, mid-month, he testified to the Senate Judicial Subcommittee, which was headed by Senator Tom Cruise. Epstein reported that although he had been his whole life, Senator left, even left-left, even more to the left and center left, and then he had, you know, vast background and experiences in the behavioral sciences, he had discovered that Google had the ability to use its algorithms in order to alter the vote for elections. And that although he had voted for Hillary Clinton, his belief in democracy and the Constitution overrode his enthusiasm for Hillary, that he had to report that at the minimum, at the minimum, Google had shifted 2.6 million, but perhaps as many as 10.4 votes in favor of Hillary Clinton. I mean, it's absolutely stunning. He in addition reported that Google had become involved in 2018, and by implication that that was the reason why the Democrats had retaken the House, and why Trump had not won a couple more Senate seats. Because I recall at the time I was baffled after reviewing the latest polling results and assessing the situation politically in general, I was convinced the Republicans were not only keen to keep the House, but they were going to pick up three or four seats in the Senate as well, which did not happen. And Epstein also reported that they were going to go all out in 2020, they were going to go all out in 2020 to defeat Trump. Now listen to a further aspect of the Wikipedia entry in Australia. Wikipedia is very, very active in updating and so forth, and while I'm convinced Wikipedia is assigned this operation that I could spell out why, where, for example, as a happy-tounded scholar for 9-11 truth when I discovered that they, I'm going to invite calls early, but I've got to get through this first. I know we have one eager caller here, and I want to get him on, but it'll be just a little while. I'm going to guess 20 minutes. So that as a founder of scholars for 9-11 truth when I discovered that Wikipedia had false information about scholars, who better than I, who had found the society back in December of 2015, doesn't set the record straight, but in 2005, but then set the record straight. I had found myself in the midst of a group discussion email with about two dozen experts around the world, and it occurred to me that it might be useful, a good idea that found a society as a loose affiliation amongst experts. I founded the society. I invited Steve Jones of physicists from BYU to be my co-chair, and the organization took off a Wulakah rocket. We had a website which I managed, I was responsible for the placement of every single item that ever appeared on that website. We had other press releases, we sponsored and promoted lectures, we published articles, we published videos. I mean, it was a tremendous success. And by the end of 2006, we had over 800 members divided into four categories. So I went on to set the record straight, but after I made five efforts and was rebuffed each time, I was able to communicate with the editor, and I said, you're not going to let me correct it, are you? And he said, no. I also discovered subsequently, by the way, that after I returned from participating in a conference I organized on the campus of the University of Illinois, a Champaign or BANA, on academic freedom, are there limits to inquiry using JFK 9-11 in the Holocaust as examples? In other words, there are some subjects so taboo that even scholars, tenured faculty, for example, are unwilling to participate in the event. And I was able to address them, I discovered that my Wikipedia entry, which was very, very substantial at the time, relating a whole lot of my research on JFK 9-11, Wellstone, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, even on the Holocaust had been gutted. I had a relatively recent copy, however, of the entry that had been so drastically abbreviated and put it up under the heading James Henry Fetzer, Wikipedia, the Freencyclopedia, Boston. So this was clearly retaliation because I had addressed the Holocaust. That's of course about as taboo as subject, as that taboo as subject could be, particularly from a Zionist perspective, because Israel's political cloud is derivative from a Western sense of guilt over the Holocaust, therefore, if it should turn out that the Holocaust was mythology rather than historical reality. It would threaten that ability to influence events, politically. What I discovered by approaching the matter systematically was that there's a broad and a narrow sense of the Holocaust, the broad being all of World War II, which involved the death and devastation of millions, including lots and lots of Jews, but that there was a more narrowly defined sense of the Holocaust, that involved three propositions. That six million Jews had been put to death in these camps, that it had been done by putting them in gas chambers and is fixating them hypothesis three, done using cyclone B. Six million gas chambers, cyclone B. Well, I was just simply astonished to discover how effortlessly once you shortly things out, a whole official narrative simply falls apart. I discovered right off the bat that there had been 236 reference to six million Jews in dire straits or fear of loss of their lives in the international press, beginning in 18 years. In the 1990 prior, all prior to the Nuremberg tribe, but also in other words, is that nothing to do with World War II. The six million was a totally independent figure. Indeed, I traced it back to a disputed passage in Levinicus that maintains that the chosen people may return to the promised land, only when they're minus six million who have been consumed in the flames, but where even that required interpolation. Because there was no word in the original Hebrew for six million. So the whole figure of six million was clearly totally up in the air, not only that, but the international committee of the Red Cross had kept meticulous records on the age, the sex, the race, the ethnicity, the religion of every single person who died in those camps, including of course their cause of death. And would you believe in 1993, the International Committee of the Red Cross recalibrated their claims and discovered that the total for all the camps combined was 296,081, none of whom died in a gas chamber from the use of Zyclon B. It turned out Zyclon B was being used to delouse the inmates to kill their body-lice because the lice were spreading typhus and dysentery. And because these were in fact labor camps, not extermination centers, you can't get work out of a course. Now, Nick Colorsham, whom I admire beyond words, who has made major contributions across a vast array of subject, including his own area of specialization of the history of science, where he's one of the world's leading figures on Sir Isaac Newton, perhaps the most important figure in the history of physics, where we could throw in Galileo on the one hand, or Einstein on the other, but there'd be a general consensus that my virtue of synthesis of the falling body of Galileo and of Tycho, Rahe's observation in the laws of motion that had otherwise been advanced, that his synthesis stood as a paradigm assigned to acknowledge for over 200 years, until Einstein discovered that space and time were limited, finite, though expanding, in that Newton's law stood as a special case, a limiting case, but that was false to the extent to which it presumed that was an absolute space and time. Einstein proved it was relative. It's really fascinating stuff, where there's a simply wonderful book by Wesley Sammon, for whom I wrote my dissertation when I earned my PhD at Indiana University in the history and the philosophy of science, about the philosophical aspects of space, time, and motion, absolutely fascinating, and it's a book, which, although on physics, subject is highly accessible to ordinary readers, so I want to recommend, Wesley Sammon's book on, as an introduction to space, time, and motion, just wonderful stuff, just to offer a simple illustration. Whether something is in motion or not presupposes a frame of reference relative to which that something is in motion or not, for example, if you're standing on the ground in the train passes by you feel that you are stationary in the train is in motion, however, you can adopt an alternative frame of reference of being on the train, and if you assume this train were stationary, then you simply see everything else in the world going by passing by at an extremely high rate of speed that just happened to be equivalent to what had you been on the ground, and assume that rate of frame of reference would have been the speed of the train passing by. But this has to do with the relativity of motion, and in order to judge whether something is in motion or not presupposes a framework, well, I am saying, had the genius to recognize the applicability of that notion, which is why we're talking about a theory of relativity, a theory of relativity of space and time in relation to frames of reference. So this is all sensational stuff. What it means, however, getting back to Auschwitz and the other camps, it turns out they were founded in relation to major military industries, and they were contributing their tooth. Nick Colostrum not only has done this brilliant work on Newton, but he also is leading expert on the 777 subway attacks in London, where he cracked the case by determining that the train from Luton, which the poor young Muslim lads who were supposed to have carried out the attacks, which took place on the very same three subway stops. And at the very same time as a drill that was taking place, that was organized and administered by one Peter Parker. Now this is not spider man. We're talking about Peter powers, not Parker powers. You can find a wonderful one hour video called about about 777 by Maud Dem in the exact title will come to me momentarily, but he takes you through the whole case from beginning to end from the beginning of the planning to the execution. What Nick discovered was that the young Muslim lads on whom the crime would be blamed were not even at the tube stops because the train from Luton they would have had to have taken was canceled that day. So they were unable to be there that didn't stop the bodies anymore than it has blaming 9-11 on 19 Islamic terrorists who were supposed to have commandeered for aircraft were all four of the alleged aircraft sites were fake and where a half a dozen or more of these guys turned up alive and well the following day and make contact with the British media. Americans have to be not so dimwitted as to realize that if these guys turned up alive and well the following day, then they were not suicidal terrorists who crashed the planes killing everyone aboard they were because the whole thing was fake. Well Nick has also made contributions to 9-11 but most importantly his most recent contribution is a book called Breaking the Spell which appeared as I recall 2009. Now the benefit that Nick had that others have not had was having access to the so-called British and Ethel books because the British had cracked the German code and they were copying every single transmission the Germans made where the Germans were extremely meticulous and precise in their record keeping. So Nick not only had the reports from the International Committee of the Red Cross he had access to the death books possessed by the UK which enabled him to verify them. One of the most striking features when I read his book for which he asked me to write the introduction which is a piece that I've also separately published as the Holocaust narrative politics Trump science was that. The the the oh yes there was a photograph of the UK soccer team at Auschwitz the UK soccer team at Auschwitz this was so stunning that when I edited and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either that I put the photograph right on the back cover. This is one of the best books I ever have it it's not only got many chapters on the moon landing and how we know we didn't go it's got chapters about the death and replacement of Paul McCartney it's got two chapters on the first death of a son of Saddam Hussein who actually was killed in a V1 bomber strike on 7 April 2003 just three weeks into the invasion. Who was in replace by a body double who was put on trial and hang it's got two chapters on the second death of Osama bin Laden who actually was arm in Afghanistan but who died of his various medical maladies on 15 December 2001 have nothing whatsoever to do with nine the wild but was politically expedient from rock Obama to resurrect him and haven't died for a second time. In a completely stage compound in Pakistan in order to position himself for a triumphal reelection okay all fake all pony I mean practically everything we know or think we know exemplifies all tears observation in history as a pack of wise the living way up on the death. Now here is what they had to say to try to discount Robert have science testimony in Congress and I say that by the way to show you that the evidence here in terms of what I'm talking about is simply overwhelming where where Robert for us on who is one of the leading historical revisionist regarding world war two has published many wonderful articles but one in particular I recognize. The command is the the sundale trials 1985 and 1988 or sundale was a very popular political figure in Canada he was even encouraged to run for prime minister which he declined but where he was prosecuted for Holocaust denial they had two trials of her first in 1985 most notable for the fact that the prosecutor was unable to produce a single witness not even. One witness who could testify to having seen anyone put to death in the gas chamber anyone and the second in 1988 if anything even more sensational because Fred look to who is a leading expert on gas chambers in the United States was called as a witness for the defense and presented a report based upon his examination of the facilities in Europe that were alleged to have function as gas chamber. I interviewed him right here on this very show with two of his colleagues in revisionist methodology he was actually taken into a room and he asked well where is the gas chamber and they told him you're in it and he said what you're giving me I mean this was like a joke so you had a sensational report for the defense. Fred walk to known as the locker report demonstrating that none of the facilities he'd examined could possibly a function as gas chambers including a facility in Auschwitz so you have all this nonsense going on to prop up the mythology of the holocaust to maintain the political clout of Israel among other nations so that their fierce about it they want to suppress any evidence to the contrary. And where that was my second book man by Amazon because the anti defamation late which you might think is the intellectual Vanguard of the most sought asked Amazon to ban any books that disputed the official account of the holocaust in Amazon.com a widegingly ban some 2000 books 2000 books. I can't begin to tell you the awful situation we're in when we become the equivalent of deaf dumb and why we have no control over our future because we don't know the difference between the true and the false this is the whole reason I do these shows edit these books produce these videos to give the American people access to what really happen. Well here we have Robert Epstein making these absolutely sensational reports to the Congress and to Ted Cruz and he's explaining that the behavioral effects and Google's mode of operation is so powerful he's never seen anything comparable in 30 or 40 years of research never seen anything comparable. So what are they right here well the Los Angeles Times reported in March 2019 that Epstein's criticism of Google had been warmly embraced by some conservatives of an unknown that Epstein said is driving me crazy what does he think conservatives care about the truth I'll tell you based upon my experience over the last 10 years especially it's only the conservatives who are concerned with the truth that Democrats are promoting falsehoods. Everywhere clean the rush of hoax the Ukraine hoax as rush a 2.0 and a whole vast of other absurdities including now that you'll buy next one this how Carolina primary. It continues in July 2019 Epstein presented his research to the Senate Judiciary Committee claiming that Google could manipulate upwards of 15 million votes in 2020 and recommend that Google search index be made public in a clarification of a question by Ted Cruz he also said that 2.6 million is a walk bottom minimum for how many votes Google might have swung toward Hillary Clinton in the 2000s. In 2016 US presidential election and that the ranges between 2.6 million in up to 10.4 million votes Google dismissed Epstein's research as quote nothing more than a poorly constructed conspiracy theory. So here's Google who obviously have powerful motives to conceal his malfeasance claiming that the PhD from Harvard who has vast research capabilities even editor-in-chief of psychology today doesn't know what he's talking about when Epstein referred to millions of documents at his disposal he's the guy who's done the homework. And let me say as soon as you hear a patient opposition being described as a conspiracy theory you can virtually take it to the bank that that means it is true. I have done a lot of work on so-called conspiracy theories where I specialize in bringing together groups of experts so we can take these conspiracy theories from theories in the weak sense of rumors speculations or guesses to theories in the strong sense of empirically testable explanatory hypotheses with special attention to sorting out authentic from fabricated evidence and figuring out what really happened. I've done it now for the moon landing done it for JFK done it for wellstone done it for Sandy Hook done it for the Boston bombing done it for Orlando and beyond the Dallas and beyond a done it for Charlottesville done it for Parkland we've done it for for Las Vegas but the book has yet to appear which I expect will occur early this year. I think if I had not been derailed by this completely absurd lawsuit that was intended to silence me from speaking out about these subjects I think we would have long since had the book out in any case what's going on here is efforts to suppress those who are seeking the truth and attempting to get it to the public. Google most certainly has a vested interest in declaring his findings as to be nothing more than a poorly constructed conspiracy theory. They have argued that his white paper was not peer reviewed and was challenged by other researchers among the criticism was that a small sample size was used to extrapolate conclusions about a population of millions and the lack of disclosure of the underlying methodology. But he's willing to talk about his methodology just as I'm willing to talk about my methodology in fact I just outlined it for you and if you take a look which you can download yourself at the early article I wrote thinking about conspiracy theories 9-11 and JFK you'll see it spelled out explicitly step by step and applying with illustrations to JFK into 9-11. Meanwhile an obscure professor from from Wellesley College panagotus met access a computer science professor said the paper demonstrated a possibility of what such an influence could have been if Google was manipulating its electoral search results. So he admits that what Epstein is describing here is entirely possible that Google could do it if they wanted adding on another researchers who have been auditing search results for years so that this did not happen. Well I can't tell you how that is how absurd that is because as Epstein explained very clearly and all you want to do is a search on YouTube but Robert Epstein addressing Congress it's virtually untraceable virtually invisible what they're doing is sending out a reminder to get on to vote to target an audience and they did that to Democrats in 2016 and produced between 2.6 million and up to 10.4 million more votes for Hill. If you want to know how Hillary could possibly have won the popular vote and yet was the electoral there it is there is the explanation it had to do with the way the votes were distributed among the very states or otherwise Google's operation would have guaranteed Hillary was the nominee even though she had a terrible time attracting crowds of over 300 I recall particularly in St. Petersburg Florida. Hillary was there and drew a crowd of 300 while Donald Trump was in baton who turned a crowd of 30,000 this was so embarrassing that they actually had to photoshop the attendance and Hillary's event to make it look as though Hillary actually had drawn his large and massive a crowd as had Donald Trump when it was of course not the case well Democrats seem to believe in their own propaganda. And of course we have all kinds of problems with Biden all kinds of of gas all kinds of incompetence even in relation to the Democratic debate in Charleston Sanders came in first with about 30%. This is based upon a drugs poll of 57,648 votes cast not scientific but indicative Sanders 29.67 caught 30% Bloomberg 19.67 caught 20% Colbert chart 15.61 caught 15% Biden 11.32 Biden didn't even do well he came in fourth he came in fourth in the Charleston debates and of course he did terrible in Iowa he did terrible in New Hampshire he didn't do appreciably better in Nevada I think he had a I think it was a fourth in Iowa fifth in New Hampshire a third in Nevada that was supposed to have caught up all to him to success in South Carolina give me a break the fact is the new polls are showing Bernie doing very well he's strongest against Trump and Wisconsin Michigan Pennsylvania strongest against Trump in Virginia strongest get Trump in Texas Surging ahead of Bloomberg in New York but the Democrats are very unhappy about this we haven't have Chris Matthew saying Dems maybe better off with Trump re-elected and Sanders taking over the party I believe that Google feels exactly the same way that the Democrats would be better off with Trump re-elected and Sanders taking over the party there's all this discussion in debate about the down ballot vote meaning if Sanders is at the top of the ticket that Sanders is going to cause the Democrats to lose their candidates for the Senate and for the House I don't think that's true I think that Bernie Sanders is by far the strongest candidate the Democrats could feel but once again just as they did in 2016 they want to sabotage Bernie's candidacy Demi Wasserman Schultz transfer 13 primaries that Bernie had won into Hillary's column to guarantee that she would be the nominee I mean what a blunder what a colossal blunder it was South rich the IT guy for the DNC because he was a Bernie supporter in disillusion with sabotaging Bernie's campaign who downloaded files directly from the DNC server in real time in the eastern time zone with the assistance of Kim dot com a familiar internet personality which he then appears to have transferred to Julian Assange by way of Craig Murray who is a the UK ambassador you back a stand so what happened here in South Carolina frankly I have no doubt about it I mean compare the gym clayburn endorsement by the way which he held off until you know very late Monday as I recall the labor endorsement was expected it wasn't going to make a difference even though this article suggests you know how Clayburn is a Democratic party boss I guarantee he didn't turn out this over well mean victory he didn't job Bernie's lead Biden's lead from 5% to 30 from 5 points to 30 points it's preposterous no statistician would would question what I'm claiming here these electoral bodies it's like the Titanic it takes a very long time to shift them unless there's some stunning unexpected remarkable event that intervenes like if you had a national disaster if you had a terrorist attack like 9-11 that could make a divergence in the population but why would anyone vote for Joe Biden even if we're under circumstances 32 years three President campaign to one win one primary why did he win in South Carolina the answer I think is obvious look at the relevant evidence here and ask yourself consider the two alternative hypotheses Joe Biden read a conventional campaign and there just was an enormous surge among the voting population of South Carolina and it was spontaneous in response to his fourth place finish in Iowa fifth place finish in New Hampshire third place finish in Nevada fourth place finish in the South Carolina debates I mean does any of that out not to mention his verbal gaps and he doesn't know it's ladies any doesn't know if he's right for president or for the Senate he thinks of 170 million Americans have died from gunshot wounds since 2007 the man suffered in your isms he's obviously brain damage he's cognitively impaired he'd be a terrible candidate for the democrats to run what they're trying to do is to use Biden just as they sought to use Buddha gig in Iowa to suppress Bernie's vote so he won't have enough to take the nomination on the first round that's the whole business after the first round all the super delegates and they're like 500 are eager to move someone else into the position Bernie would have legitimately won the problem for the democrats is Bernie's been played once already he and his followers aren't going to let it happen again if they take Bernie out if they deny him the nomination when he comes in with a plurality of the delegates as I confidently predict will be the case barring of course how Google may continue to use its algorithms then they they're not going to vote for whoever the democrats nominating without the Bernie supporters who are by far the most enthusiastic out there he's the only candidate who can generate enthusiasm to the degree as Donald Trump the democrats are going to be out to see there's been a suggestion they might run the hill Michelle Obama so that you know I have to address again and again Michelle Obama's shortcomings as it were as a candidate because as I've reported to you here before Michelle Obama is the man who underwent a sex change operation Michelle was born Michael Laverne Robinson Lake football for Oregon State before she transferred to Princeton adopted a female persona Michelle Obama as her physician doctor Raphael Espinoza reported after having walked in on her I know what I saw Michelle Obama is not a woman who used to be a man Michelle Obama is just a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill on the campaign trail no medical staff were allowed to go near her other than to take vitals if she got sick which you never did I know what I know because I walked in on her or him while he was taking a leak standing up in a bathroom in Trenton they paid me millions for my science but after seeing what they did to this country I just can't be stay quiet let them sue me there's an honest man as I said before if she is honest about who she is and if the public wants to vote for a man with breast implants so be it I'm a different stroke for different folks kind of God but I believe in truth and advertising we've been played too many times the democrats have gone completely out there and the latest example is what we have right here where Joe Biden could not possibly have established that 30 point victory over Bernie Sanders without the assistance of Google one hypothesis is preferable to another when the probability of the evidence is higher on that hypothesis if it were true than the alternative the probability of all this evidence I've been describing here is overwhelmingly higher on the basis of the probability of the evidence higher on the hypothesis at Google intervened to get Biden the boost to suppress Bernie so the democrats can make their own pick at a broker convention that if you take it to a legitimate election with no intervention by Google I'm not a ponder what I'm saying here because it's absolutely dead serious and I guarantee you this is in the area of evaluating the relationship between hypotheses and evidence which is among my areas of expertise as a philosopher of science I'm going to invite you all to call in after the break I have been dissipated taking the whole first hour but there it is 5403524452 Mitchell will field your call I repeat 5403524452 and I believe I already have a caller standing by to which to whom I will turn when we're back from this break I'm so glad you're all here this is very important stuff and you're just not going to get this from any other source check out my blog JamesFempsor.org and you'll find a complete layout of the case for the simple proof Biden be burning because Google intervened Google for Biden that's the thing Google is going all the way for Biden to promote the democrats and to defeat Trump have no doubt about it I'm so glad you're all here this is very important stuff and I believe I already have a question for you guys I'm so glad you're all here this is very important stuff and I believe I already have a question for you guys I'm so glad you're all here this is very important stuff and I believe I already have a question for you guys I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe I believe Eat! Let water! Is your data safe? Do you have the necessary information to assist you in confidently living through just about any survival situation? Survival, gardening, off-grid living, medical knowledge, or even natural or man-made-eMPs in your list of personal concerns? Do you have your documents and your personal information as safe place in your hands, or do you know where it is? Well, check out our Reloaded EMP Proof Lundry. Over three gigs of survival documents and how-tos. Plus, the USDA Offline Food Preservation website and much, much more, including a surprise bonus we just can't tell you about it. With fire, room, leftover to store your most important documents, imagine if a megabyte of your own, you can use it as a home-bedroom. You can use it as a home-bedroom. You can use it as a home-bedroom. You can use it as a home-bedroom. You can use it as a home-bedroom. You can use it as a home-bedroom. You can use it as a home-bedroom. You can use it as a home-bedroom. You can use it as a home-bedroom. You can use it as a home-bedroom. And they got to defend the right. We just got to do it! Be out of cover, you've had it. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. We're going to see that you just pick it up. Even the government admits that 90-letter was a conspiracy. Did you know that it was an inside job that Osama had nothing to do with it? That the twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of many or micro-news. That building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building. Very chennings was there. He heard them go off and felt themselves definitely over dead people. The US Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event. Ironically, that means the government's home evidence contradicts the government's official position. 9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the Neal cons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad. Don't let yourself be played. Read American Nuke on 9-11, available at moonrotbooks.com. That's moonrotbooks.com. All right. Thanks for listening. I want to take this short break here. I'm listening right here at FreedomSelves.com. Yeah, we're going to get back to your notes. I'm Vishal's notified me. We have a couple here of parties who would like to raise questions. Paul, I know you were standing by before and I couldn't take your earlier. I'm going to go back and we'll get you on the air too, but we're going to start with Scott. Scott, speak right up. Join the conversation. Glad to hear what you have to say. Hey, glad to be here. Excellent. I'm joined in to that too. Yeah, I just want to touch on Michael Obama. Yeah, yeah. And you know, you know, Barack, actually when he was making a formal statement in front of the Joint Chiefs of Staff referred to her as Michael, Michael and I, he has these little verbal gaps intermittently. Go ahead. Go ahead, Scott. Yeah, Mike, Mike and Sir is like, I really see this as blue moon. I mean, actually, after this super delicate, I see him coming out and talking. And I see him putting him up. Well, I see him putting Michelle. The Michael has as I, sir, I see him putting him in the VT spot. In the VP spot with who, who, who running with, with, with, I see Bloomberg taking us after the super dough. Oh, Bloomberg, Bloomberg. I don't know. You know, here's my opinion, Scott. How can the Democrats after having spent all these years demonizing an old rich, white racist, sexist billionaire from New York run as their candidate. Old, white, rich racist, sexist, billionaire from New York. I mean, it seems to me simply absurd that they're self-destructing. And Bloomberg is generally no enthusiasm whatsoever out there. He's dollarish dishwater. He doesn't have anything to say. He has all these glossy ads out there for which he spent now. It appears approaching half a billion dollars. But it's not benefiting him politically that I can see. The deal, the deal, Scott is this. Google is the key. If they have begun manipulating the election now, as I've been laying out, they can buy the win, a 30 point win in South Carolina when he ought to have properly won by five to ten points. What are they going to do on super Tuesday? They may try to steal the whole, everything. Again, but for Biden, I can't tell you. But all the polling is going to be contradict. Bernie's had a lock on California forever in California. So winter take all state. It's going to be a result that's going to contradict all the polling. But then so, too, did South Carolina? I tell you, Google's going all out. And if you want to see an atrocious mess, the camp, what are they doing? They are decimating democracy here because they think they know better. By the way, the fundamental principle of democracy isn't the wisdom of the people. It's rather than making decisions that affect everyone, everyone on our participate in making the decision. In other words, collective responsibility for decisions that have collective consequences. So Google is playing the role of a tyrant. That would make Bloomberg their candidate because he was a tyrant in New York. So you think Bloomberg and Michelle, Michael, Michael, Minnie Mike, as Trump refers to him, Minnie Mike and Michael, Michelle Obama, you think are likely to get the nod? Yeah, I'm just based on my theory on, I mean, they don't remember this money. Okay. And it's like, and I can't see it. I can't see them in German, Socialists. I can't see them putting a bill in there. And I'm just thinking, I don't know black women, that color style, that color, two birds of them, and it's actually just Bloomberg's money. And I just think that when the super-deal-up is gone, we're going to go through the number of things. Which is fascinating to me. I mean, I do have a thought that like too too too too too too too too. What? What? The difference being that, you know, Bernie, I have even drawn this contrast with Trump. Even though, of course, I voted for Trump. And I almost certainly will vote for him again because surely the Democrats aren't going to allow Bernie to be the nominee. He's the one I could have thought about voting for. Because I actually think Medicare for all is right. And of course, his policy with Trump overlaps in terms of the Middle East and getting us out. I have said I'd rather have a Jewish president who put us America first and a non-Jewish president who puts Israel first. Because in terms of his foreign policy, Trump has been running as scientists foreign policy. And I don't like it one bit. Go ahead, Scott. I'm going to go. Let me hop in here for a second. Okay. Yeah. Hey, hey, hey, Jim. Hey, I'm going to make point of order. Almost interrupt the gym right smack in the middle of his, if is a rant there a second ago. To point out, we are not talking about democracy. We're not talking about the voting public. We're talking about a nonprofit corporation that is having their own internal. Validating to select a representative. It is not a public function of anything. The Democrat party went to courts. Oh, yeah, yeah, you're talking about the DNC and the RNC. Yeah, you're right. Yeah, the DNC went right courts and defended the right to pick anybody they wanted. Yes, they did. And that they effectively said that the party could have favored any candidate or a candidate. Even if it were true, that's the business of a party. And it's not just a bull. Mitchell, you're 100% correct because Bernie Sanders supporters brought a lawsuit against the DNC for sabotaging his campaign. The law enforcement shocks in the DNC argued they were legally entitled to do that because it was a private company. And that even though by implication, it meant all the caucuses and the primaries are merely political theater, a charade, that they have the right to run any nominee they wanted in the court agreed. So you're making an impeccable point, Mitchell. I agree with you 100%. Okay, second point of order here. The super delegates, we got Paul just joined us. So the delegates and the super delegates, 1991 delegates, during the rigged primary, whoever gets selected gets selected. A total of 39, 79 delegates, 1991 is half. And then if the nobody gets a winning 1991, they go to the split, they go to the second balloting. And that frees every delegate up the 39, 79 delegates are all free to vote however they want. Yes. Plus an additional 771 super delegates and 89, which are that never Bernie Democrats. Yeah, you're right. They're told a 3979 delegates available and you have to secure 1,990 or 1,991 to have the nomination in hand on the first ballot. And if that doesn't happen, that's when all hell is going to break loose. And I tell you, it's in Milwaukee just down the road from where I live near Madison here in Wisconsin. And I tell you, it's going to be chaotic. I predict it's going to be like 1968 in Chicago. Paul, go ahead, join in. We can have all three of you here. Go ahead, Paul. Yeah, fun times those 1968 event today. I remember well. This may be going out on a limb here, Jim. And I, you know, I could get suits for saying such things, you know, it's crossed my mind, but maybe Adam Launthe was just a fall guy, a cover in that Joe Biden was the real shooter at Sandy Hook. Well, if you consider that very amusing, Paul, I know you've got a point in there somewhere. That will be a minute or I can. One point quick call. Joe Biden only shoots people with a shotgun through the door. Has Biden actually shot someone with a shotgun through the door? That's what Joe Biden advised people to do with their shotgun, somebody in the door. You don't need that AR 15 with the 30 round cliff. You just need a shotgun. You can shoot right through the door. I think I don't think that works from a legal point of view because, you know, you wouldn't be in fear of loss of your life and what's so far that they're not even in your home. If they're in your home, you can shoot them. That's for sure, but shooting through the doorway. You're probably going to go to jail for manslaughter or something. I agree. I agree. I'm just saying what the vice president said. Yeah, but he don't you agree? He appears to be cognitively impaired. I mean, he would be a terrible candidate. And I cite downers Joe. It's sundowner Joe. Go ahead. I wonder the other guy. He's got a conflict. I mean, he's I mean, he's shown side of the scenario. I can't see how he did possibly win the convention. I just don't see it. I mean, it was simple. I like me to see that. Yes. Okay. Anything can happen in politics. You know that. Well, Scott, I think you're right. I think they were using Buddha gig and now Biden to try to suppress Bernie. He doesn't make the magic number for the first ballot. That's a whole idea. They're completely in control as long as he doesn't get to the 1990 or 1990 woman. That's his only option because they're going to suppress him for sure. And we willing to follow Chris Matthews position that the Democrats might be better off. You know, with Trump reelected than they would with Bernie at the top of the ticket. I mean, it's amazing. He even said that. But there was baldly Paul. Well, so the other thought that occurred to me is Ken Jill Biden account for his whereabouts on November 22nd, 1963. Very amusing. We do have a lot of serious issues here. Do you agree with my diagnosis? It was Google's intervention because look, that's only that's the only clause of explanation for what happened in South Carolina yesterday. Well, the theme was the reason I said the things I said. The theme was in keeping with what you were talking about, which is fantasy, fantasy land. That's what we're dealing with. Right. Can you disagree with that? Well, you mean the fantasy land being perpetrated by. Oh, oh, you mean this is about Paul, Paul, Paul. This is about as credible as claiming that Lee Oswald firing three lucky shots are that 19 Islamic terrorists attacked us on 9-11 to claim that Joe Biden beat Bernie by 30 points in South Carolina. Of course, you know, so way back when when I read the first five chapters of the call yours book, vote scam, which I recommend all the listeners do, but I know where you will. I mean, I can recommend all kinds of books and articles and most people never follow up, but you read vote scam by the call the brothers and you just you won't waste your time voting. I'm almost ashamed to admit that I voted for Trump for the first time in 30 years because others in that I then generally did not vote. Now, if for the reason that they lay out in the book, both scam, but also for the fact that in most cases or let's say all cases, voting is a joke, is it accomplishes nothing because we do that control issues or policy. We only vote for people and that most of the people that we elect the things that they put forth the things that they do, the policy and the decisions that are made would never pass the vote of the general population. Nobody would have voted for the bail out of Wall Street. Nobody would have voted for the Iraq war on and on just gain your issue. Nobody votes for these things. So therefore it's ridiculous to even talk about voting, but politics is entertainment. I get it. So that's one of the reasons we call these shows is that here are voices re-flagged back on the internet. Well, it is all very outrageous. Mitch, Mitchell, let me come back to you. I know you have further thoughts to. I think it looks that in October 1963 with the five broad piece to Gambia and then also on the other side that was well Dodgers team that swept the series. I think Biden was there too. It's clear that Biden is kind of the establishment pick for the candidate. The majority of the super delegates are on for Biden. It is going to be a if you're an independent, you know, you know, maybe I shouldn't say this on the air, but I'm going to approach Democrats and help them help me get on the ballot because when they shaft Bernie Sanders, they're going to need a alternative to vote for. So they don't want to vote with public in so you get it independent in there and then they'll vote for the independent, but as a protest against the Democrat chefs and Bernie again, or maybe they'll just finally get it and they'll understand it. I don't know. I don't know. It's. It's you have to figure out how many people get through over and over again in this two party dynamic and how they they do this successful emotional pitch on the left and on the right to keep the status quo going. Go ahead. I'm going to go ahead. Yeah. Scott, come on back. Yeah. Let me know of course that we have any more callers. Your Scott, go ahead with further thoughts of yours. Yeah, I want to touch on like when we're independent candidate. If Bernie should go independent or anybody independent, that's just going to get from the action behind. I support Trump. Anybody I'm a Democrat. Critics like right now and I wish I could look to you. Mitch. Well, but let's see that's the problem. How? How? You know, any independent is going to have to split a vote. He's going to have to split Democrats and he's going to have to split Republicans. And you know, there's there's there's a time when you can kind of rally more of that and get more of a centrist view. Because the radicals have kind of seized a lot of the party and I will consider Trump a real dark heart Republican. The same way I never consider Bernie Sanders a Democrat. So yeah. Even even even Bloomberg isn't really a Democrat. I mean, trick right now. Let all these these these affiliations. Just in sync with Paul's observation, we know the saying it voting made a difference. They wouldn't let us do it. Okay, I got one more for you. And this is especially for Jim who will get a chuckle out of this one. And then we can we can get serious after this. Jim, I think it was Joe Biden's voice in peak terrible earpiece that told him don't run the ball on the goal. I'm here throw a short pass over the middle. That was terrible for those who missed the we're talking about a super ball between the sea hawks and the Patriots where the sea hawks were on the one yard line. They could have they had four plays to make a TD. They had this marvelous back by the name of which he could have run it in in a single play instead. Russell Wilson was instructed to pass directly to the Patriots and then on the next place and say we're on the one yard line. They might have sacked and what and you know, it made me to safety or whatever. So the sea hawks and actually deliberately went off side to get him an extra five yards and then of course seal the deal was outrageous. It was a single most disgusting event because I was so excited. Russell Wilson that played here in Madison for the Badgers. And we had a spectacular year. What's in the Rose Bowl? I really like Russell. But to see him degraded like that by having to play out a staged event. They'd only got to the one yard line on a spectacular pass that was bouncing in the air. I mean that it was even caught was a minor miracle. I don't think that was in the script. So they had to you know throw away the game. It just disgusted me. In spite of the fact that here's I've had a guy writing to me. I'm not sure if the other person is the only one who's out there. It's fine to the fact that I've had a guy writing to me for years, predicting the outcomes of games based on the many line in the last big. I don't know why we got to. Yeah, go ahead. I really like. Somebody get the background. We got to turn your radio. You're right. I'm going to get the background. I'm going to get the background. Okay. There we are. There we are. Paul give us more time. Anyway, for all the listeners who don't care about any of that, I apologize, but I thought you would. I didn't do that. I was still that was conspiracy. I was still that was a conspiracy. I was still that was a conspiracy. See how she has. Give us give us give us more days. Are we are we writing out a conversation here that would be. Yeah, we were ready for. Well, we got. Hey guys, be my. Who worked. You know, if you heard what Matt Kaiser is bringing up about Bloomberg. No, tell me tell us about Bloomberg. 10 years ago, he was worth three billion. Now he's worth 60 billion. And Bloomberg news, a financial news channel really does not make that much an advertising relative to the expenses. Yeah, yeah, having anchors and producers and a set and all that. So what's going on a lot of from somewhere and Max Kaiser is saying that not only Bloomberg, but the other. Aschkin, as he all got it, have been given part of money direct Warren Buffett was actually bankrupt, burst your halfway. He considered to be a great capitalist, but all he is is a welfare recipient. Okay, that's good. We have we have Dave from Arizona here. I want to bring a Dave from Arizona. Dave, go ahead join the conversation. Yeah, I'm. I'm. You said similar terms that you're a group with that. But you standards will be a fact. I'm very careful. Yeah, I just wanted to make you better. I'm not going to say that you're going to say it's not what he's not. That's not what he's not. That's not what he's been teaching it. Because the real attention of burning the June with communist is to go that the security medicare system. So they get torn down completely because he was interviewed the other day. And they were asking specifically. Because that means he's going to come around with. He was very good. And he said absolutely. So it's not about he's a right person. Dave, I didn't quite catch what you're saying. Bernie said he was going to wipe out all the social programs like social security. I mean, that can't be that can't be right. Yeah, I can really try to do it when you let me that. I don't I don't I don't I don't I don't want to disagree with you there, Dave. We've got hijacked here too. Boy, we're getting quite a rowdy crowd out here. Hijacker. Go ahead. Join the conversation. Yeah, so real quick. I'm coming through fine. Yeah, so I can tell you through personal experience in South Carolina. I watched it for myself. I watched a primary when was among Republicans where instead of counting the votes actually in the lunchroom auditorium of the county building. The sheriff actually picked them up and took them back in his office where they counted the votes. Very corrupt in South Carolina. So you're right, Jim. Those numbers don't make any sense. They did the polling. It was basically neck and neck from wherever. And it's a Biden win by 50% vote. It's just not possible. 30 points. It was 30 points. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, by with 50. You're correct. Yes. Yeah. It's right. It's ridiculous. Ridiculous. Right. And my other point is, um, what we're watching in the Democratic party is actually an organic civil war. And this is the problem of Democrats. God, no matter what they do. But they got one option they can they could probably get away with, but it's pretty severe. I like as I calculate the ballots realizing that, you know, California is a winner take all. That's for 100 delegates right there. Yes. I'm thinking Bernie. If Bernie comes out of the super Tuesday one and super Tuesday two. Um, and he's gotten he's got the delegates. He needs. Yeah. Then what we're looking at is they're not going to let Bernie Sanders get the nomination. They're not going to do that. If they have to give them a heart attack, they'll do that. Uh, if they got a knock of playing down, but they're not going to let Bernie Sanders go into the convention. And here's the problem they got outside of burning having a heart attack between super Tuesday and the nomination process, which would be believable. Everybody would believe that he's old. He's already had one outside of that. Um, if they take it away from Bernie, even if he gets close, uh, you're right, Jim. The Bernie Sanders supports. Um, and the people that believe in him. They're of the same cloth, or they're the same type of zealotry tha