Jewish Lobbying To Classify YOU As A Domestic Terrorist

Video Transcript:

The owners of this country know the truth. It's called the American dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it. Yeah. All right, everyone. I hope you're doing well. It's Wednesday, May 11th. And I just saw this article today. This is off JewishInsider.com. Jewish Dems to Lobby Lawmakers on Anti-Semitism, Voting Rights, and Abortion. Hundreds of activists start set to meet this week with Democratic Lawmakers. And it says that Jewish Democratic Council of America is set to send hundreds of activists to virtually lobby Democratic lawmakers today and tomorrow on a range of issues, including anti-Semitism, voting rights, and abortion access. As of Monday, JDCA has confirmed 52 meetings with lawmakers, 14 senators, and 38 House members. The group's week of action last year had more than 700 activists participants and organizers are expecting a similar turnout this year. Now, here's where you need to pay attention, right? Under the Anti-Semitism umbrella, the group plans to urge passage of the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act, which has stalled in the House due to opposition from both Republicans and far-left Democrats, support increasing nonprofit security grant program funding to 360 million, supporting its reform, and press legislators on backing social media regulation, the combat extremism, and improved transparency. So they admit it. They don't even try to hide it. Under the Anti-Semitism umbrella, okay, they wanna achieve all these things. So they're using it as an excuse to pass domestic terror laws. In this bill, you should be very worried about it. HR 350, if you actually go and read it, if this passes, this video right here is a great example of what could actually happen. This is off the House Committee on the Judiciary's YouTube channel. It's a three-hour and 12-minute video. I've watched the whole thing. I'll put the link in the description if you wanna check it out. But Congress was talking about what this could do, people who were for it, people who were against it. And essentially, if you watch this, pretty much any person who's a person of color or a woman in this, for the most part, all they had to say was white supremacy, white nationalism, white supremacy, white nationalism. And that's the reason they wanna pass this bill is so they can combat that, okay? White supremacy is not a problem in the United States. White nationalism is not a problem in and of itself. Black nationalism is not a problem in and of itself. We could have a pluralist society if we really wanted to, where things could actually be a lot better and people could actually get along a lot more. But they don't want nationalism in any form, okay? So white nationalism is always going to be demonized, but Jewish nationalism never will be, okay? They're never gonna question the state of Israel, all right? Which is a Jewish nationalist state. If you question that, you're anti-Semitic, okay? But they're going to use the umbrella of anti-Semitism, okay? Last year, our week of action was instrumental in getting quite a few additional co-sponsors for the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act, Swiffer said. And we're confident that again, this year, it will make a difference in generating a better understanding and interest in the legislation that matters most to Jewish voters. JDCA will also push for continued aid to Ukraine, as well as continued support for Israel, aid to the Palestinians, and a return to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. I don't think they really care about Palestinians, but they want that money going to Israel, right? Billions and billions of dollars a year. So they're using the umbrella of anti-Semitism. Well, what is anti-Semitism? I've covered this many times, and I'm going to sound like a broken record. But I'm going to use the IHRA definition, which is the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition, which was adopted by Trump with an executive order. So the United States uses that as the official definition. In most states, this year, especially, I've been covering it, state after state after state, has been adopting this term. Now, it's a quote unquote non-legally binding term, but what they actually consider anti-Semitism would surprise you. Okay? Here are some examples, making mandatious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such, or the power of Jews as collective, such as, especially, but not exclusively. Like I said before, I hate this lawyer talk. They're ambiguous on purpose. Okay, because it's an umbrella, right? Myth about a world Jewish conspiracy, or if Jews controlling the media, economy, government, or other societal institutions. Okay, so using the umbrella of anti-Semitism, they want to pass domestic terror legislation, set up all these new bureaus, interagency task force to combat domestic terrorism, which is really just going after people they politically disagree with, regular, everyday Americans. So just saying that Jews control the media, which they do, could actually be considered a hate crime in domestic terrorism if you were to post it on social media, potentially. Okay, that could actually happen, and it seems that's what they're trying to do, which is why I'm trying to wake people up to this. Now, check this out. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms, gas chambers, which never existed, by the way, or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people but the hands of national socialist Germany, and its supporters and accomplices during World War II. So just questioning any of the facts, quote unquote, or just the mere scope of the Holocaust? Well, six million didn't die. It was 5,999,999. Okay, well that's anti-Semitic, right? Accusing the Jews as people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, into the interests of their own nations. It seems like they're pretty cohesive as a community. Okay, and they work for their own best interest, which more often than not, are at the detriment to everybody else. Okay, so yeah, here's some great examples right here of what anti-Semitism is. And again, I implore you to watch this video, if you can, because they're just very open with it. It's going after white people. If you're white in your questioning Jewish power, you will be considered a domestic terrorist. Okay, this definition is absurd, and even a lot of Jews don't like this definition, because they say that it's chilling, and it could silence free speech. But these Jewish lobbyists, right, they're everywhere, and they work over time to subvert you. You wanna see a great example of that? Well, here's a document which I've covered multiple times, which I want you to share like hell, because it hasn't gotten enough traction, in my opinion. I think this is a very, very damning document. I don't care if the author has since come out and disavowed it, he said what he said, and what he said is true. Okay, this is the Jewish stake in America's changing demography, reconsidering a misguided immigration policy by Stephen Steinlight. And you can research who Stephen Steinlight is, like I said, he has since come out and publicly disavowed this, but he said it nonetheless, and he's an American Zionist. Now, it's page six and seven specifically that I want you to pay attention to. And again, share this. I don't see anyone else in the alternative media talking about this document. I'm the one that dug it up and made videos about it. I even called them. I'm gonna put that in the end of the video actually, because I want you to hear when I called what that woman's reaction was, but they're very, very candid in this, okay? Facing up to the gradual demise of Jewish political power. Not that it is the case that our disproportionate political power pound for pound, the greatest of any ethnic, cultural group in America will erode all at once or even quickly. We will be able to hang onto it for perhaps a decade or two longer. Unless and until the triumph of campaign finance reform is complete, an extremely unlikely scenario. Great material wealth of the Jewish community will continue to give it significant advantages. We will continue to court and be courted by key figures in Congress. That power is exerted within the political system from the local to national levels through soft money, and especially the provision of out-of-state funds to candidate sympathetic to Israel. A high wall of church state separation and social liberalism combined with selective conservatism on criminal justice and welfare issues. Jewish voter participation also remains legendary. It is among the highest in the nation, which means that again, it could disproportionately affect our legislation, which it does, and it's going to continue to do unless we ourselves get out there and fight just as hard as they are. Credible as it sounds, in the recent presidential election. Remember, this was written in 2001. More Jews voted in Los Angeles than Latinos. But should the naturalization of resident aliens begin to move more quickly in the next few years, a virtual certainty, and it should? And it is only a matter of time before the electoral power of Latinos, as well as that of others, overwhelms us. Okay, now check this out. For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agendas. Let me read that again. For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agendas. Okay, here's another one. Even with these caveats, an era of astoundingly disproportionate Jewish legislative representation may already have peaked. Again, this was written in 2001. We have probably more Jews in his cabinet than at any other point, I mean, aside from Trump. It is unlikely we will ever see many more U.S. Senate's with 10 Jewish members. And although had Al Gore been allowed by the Supreme Court to assume office, a Jew would have been only one heartbeat away from the presidency. It may be well, we'll never get that close again. Again, this was written like 20 years ago and they're closer than they've ever been. With the changes in view, how long do we actually believe that nearly 80% of the entire foreign aid budget of the United States will go to Israel because that's all they're concerned about. Look up how much money they've also gotten in reparations since the Holocaust, just from Germany alone, right? It is also true that Jewish economic influence and power are disproportionately concentrated in Hollywood, television, and in the news industry. Theoretically a boon in terms of the formation of favorable public images of Jews and sensitizing the American people to issues of concern to Jews, but ethnic dominance in an industry does not itself mean that the centers of opinion and attitude formation in the national culture are sources of Jewish political power. They are not noticeably Jewish in the sense of advancing a Jewish agenda, Jewish communal interest, or the cause of Israel. Now listen to this, in television, the Jewish industry par excellence with its shallow values, rotesque materialism, celebration of violence, utter superficiality, anti-intellectualism, and sex exploitation certainly does not advance anything that might be confused with Jewish values. It is probably true, however, that the situation would be worse in terms of the treatment of Jewish themes and issues in the media without this presence. So here he is admitting that they control Hollywood and television disproportionately, right? And all it promotes is filth, but that's not to be confused with their values, but they're putting it out there for you to consume, right? Because your cattle and they don't care about you, okay? Now again, what he just said would be considered anti-semitic using the IHRA definition of anti-semitism, making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such, or the power of Jews as collective, such as, especially, but not exclusively. I hate those words, man. Myth about a Jewish world conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government, or other societal institutions. Well, he just said that, okay? So again, share this document with everyone you can. It needs to go viral. Like I said, not a lot of people have talked about it, I've covered it multiple times and I know I sound like a broken record, but these people are working over time to subvert us in every single way that they can. So you need to take action. You need to lobby, you need to get out there, you need to call your senators, you need to call your congressman. Yeah, I know the meme and I believed it for the longest time. Just vote harder, bro. Just vote harder, bro. Voting's not gonna achieve anything. Well, that might be true with like presidential elections and things like that, because all we have to choose from is a Zionist or Zionist, right? Trump or Biden, it doesn't matter. Pick red or blue, they're both working for the same team, but we can create change at the local level if we all get out there and act, we can actually do something. And you should be fired up to do something, get out there and act. Don't just sit there and complain. And again, I advise you to watch this video on the House Committee on the Judiciary's YouTube channel, markup HR 350, the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2021. You can watch this full video, it's three hours long. All they do is demonize white people and they wanna use anti-Semitism, the umbrella of it, right, to pass this legislation, which means they're gonna go after you and your family for saying things that they think are wrong or that they disagree with politically. It's all about policing dissidents. It has nothing to do with combating terrorism, just like DHS and the Patriot Act had nothing to do with combating terrorism, okay? It's all a joke. The joke's on you and you need to stop being a fool. Mike, are you talking or can I help you? Hey, how you doing? I had a couple questions and I didn't know if maybe you could give me some context or help me answer. Can you tell me who you are first? Yes, my name's Chad. And are you with media or what do you? No, no, no, I'm just a regular person. Okay, regular person, no one's just a regular person. How can I help you? Well, I read some things in this document and it's just kinda, it doesn't sit right with me and I was wondering if it was... My document. Well, it's called the Jewish stake in America's changing demography. It was... Oh my gosh, that's old, old, old, old. Yes, yes, it was put out in 2001 actually. But it was by Mr. Steven Steinlight, but I didn't know if it was his opinions in this document or if it was maybe the opinions of the organization because it just kinda... Well, I will say, I gotta say 2001 before my time, let's see, I have to, but I will say, if you actually follow our work, you'll see that Mark Corcoran kind of runs... Like if you go to Heritage Foundation, it's kinda run top down like they know what they think and the people below them kind of all online with that. Whereas Mark has, we've got lots of people, think tank, he can't, I mean his philosophy here is everyone gets to have their own opinion. So you'll often, if you look at our blog, you'll sometimes see two people with kind of a different view on something. So I haven't read it and like I said, it's before my time, but... Yeah, it's... I'm kinda how Mark, but that's how Mark runs, seeing people have their own opinion. Okay. Well, it's... That helps you or not, but I have to look at this. Yeah, no, I totally understand that. It's 20 years old. Yeah, but what's your interest in it? Well, there's this one specific statement in there. It's under this section titled, Facing Up to the Graduate Demise of Jewish Political Power. And it says, for perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to, and this is quoting him, this is what troubles me, to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions to support our agendas. And then it also talks about how they... What are you, and you're just Joe Blow. Why are you looking back at a 2001 document from CISF? What's your interest? Why are you looking at this subject matter? Just because with all the time off, I've had recently with the pandemic, I've taken it upon myself to sort of, you know, understand what's going on and the mechanisms behind our government, things like think tanks, things like NGOs. And I kind of just follow the publications, which are being put out. And you know, it popped up actually. I was doing a Google search. It was an old document, but it just happened to pop up. I guess maybe a keyword triggered it. But I'm just trying to understand why there is... It seemingly nothing against Jewish people whatsoever. But it seems like there's just an inordinate influence over our government, things like APEC, the ADL. And then reading this document, it's very damning. They seemingly admit they control Hollywood and television and our Congress in this document by this gentleman who's an admitted Zionist. And Zionism, I guess, which is the problem. It's not Jewish people, but I guess it's like a political movement. This is some system that I actually have no desire to comment on. And I don't think it is... So do you not stand with this disgusting stuff published in it? I don't. I disagree with it. Can we just end up waiting for this one paragraph? No, there's more. There's two full pages. He talks about the power of Zionists and the pandemic impact over all these different areas. I'm not going to comment on a line that's in a large document that I've never read. Oh, that's fair enough. I would suggest you read it, though. Actually, I will. You've drawn it to my census, and I will read it, but I have absolutely no comment. It's fine because I haven't read it. Like, I think it's something that... It's a 20-year-old document. First of all, he doesn't even work with us anymore. Yeah, no, no. I totally understand that. I just think it's something that the CIS should disavow. Because I really think you should read it. Page six and seven, specifically. Yeah, I've pulled it up, so I will take a look at it. I appreciate you drawing it to our attention. Yeah, no problem at all. I do appreciate it. Thank you for giving me the context. And hopefully if you get to read it, you'll... You guys can at least take it off the site because I just... I didn't say anything right away. No, I don't want to take a look at it. Yeah, I'm just like I said. I know Steven, so it's kind of odd to me to hear you talk that way, but he would say because I know him. But I like it that never read it. It wasn't here at the time. So I will take a look. All right, well, I appreciate it. Thank you for your patience and listening to me. So, all right, well, you have a good day. Okay.