Vaccine Warp Speed Trump Slaoui Fauci Moderna Gates Connections Coronavirus Covid-19 Lockdowns Quarantine

Video Transcript:

can clear off the bat, the US have known if you're watching this channel that suggesting that Fauci and Gates are responsible or involved in what the negative things that are happening, which I completely agree with, is not to suggest one that the other people we want to suggest are not, and she would that they're not tied back to those same people. Right? I mean, this is the, this is the, oh, this is the frustratingly ignorant and simplified, reduced narrative, because people want to pit it onto one group and try to omit responsibility from all the other people around that. What you're going to see right after we get past this is the connections that go from everyone to everyone, from Trump to Salawi, from Salawi to Moderna, from Moderna to, I mean, it goes all the way around the circle, right? Moderna to Gates, Moderna to Fauci, right? This is the point. Now, you could argue that he is a bumbling fool that's not aware of what's happening and they're tricking in the whole time. I'm not sure why that's any better. And I can give you that. But at the end of the day, he is responsible. As the president of the United States, he is responsible. Trick or not. It's the connections that go from everyone to everyone, from Trump to Salawi, from Salawi to Moderna, from Moderna to, I mean, it goes all the way around the circle, right? Moderna to Gates, Moderna to Fauci, right? This is the point. It's the connections that go from everyone to everyone. Now, keeping all of this in mind, guys, remember where we are today. Remember that Donald Trump just appointed Salawi, who you're looking at there on the right, as the vaccines are, who had had lots of money invested in Moderna, who is on the board of directors. Talk about conflicts of interest, but that's apparently okay if you're on the inner circle, right? But for you, peon's out there, you're not allowed. So you go sit back down, right? Special treatment. This is the kind of thing that we're seeing from these people that are tied in across the line. The same project, the same people, and now they're maximizing profit based on the situation they're creating. As they're driving in all these projects, right? All the same things. They're using it to abuse you, even at a governmental level, even at a personal profit level. Because if you might remember, we just talked about this. Salawi challenged for huge conflict of interest. I mean, what do you mean challenge? I mean, this is some really feeble, cowardly journalism. And I'm not even trying to accuse this website, like just anybody. Can we not just be like, this is a conflict of interest. Like this is the literal textbook definition of a conflict of interest. We have to be like, challenged, it might be, could be a conflict of interest. It's obviously one. For crying out loud, the guy had literally has stock invested in the company that he just made proper for momentarily, profit wildly. But remember, they came out and they said with this weird, ridiculous study that we talked about on the show that eight people, by the way, which I think we, people are now finding out that that's exactly why it was unrealistic that the Moderna study only tested eight people for possible antibodies when it was actually a safety study, which they didn't even mention, which is basically nothing. But their stock went up like 30%. And then guess what happened? Salawi sold it all and made a huge profit. And then guess what happened? It dropped again. Almost like they knew what was coming. Almost like they planned it out. Almost like this was all something intentional. The bottom line as this article makes clear, it's obscene the way that this works. This is just the stock market. As this person says, it's a perfect storm of stupid in the stock market right now. This is the company's stock jumped 26%. And that's after they came out with that study. Again, as I said, it was in only eight subjects. And it says it's a full 24 hours before the market actually read Moderna's clinical trial, which cited COVID-19 antibodies forming an only eight subjects. But guess what? If you're listening now and you're watching this show every day, you're aware of this already. You know why? Because we talked about it the day it happened. We didn't wait 24 hours in a 30% jump in the stock market. We were on our show that night saying, it's only eight people. It doesn't mean anything. And it's all an illusion, right? As usual, you knew what was happening before everybody else because you're watching this show or watching the independent media for that matter. Because it's not just me. There's a lot of other people out there doing exactly this. The point is the mainstream was, I don't know, sitting on their hands waiting for the government to pat them on the head and say, go ahead. You go ahead and talk about it. As the market also noticed that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which was partnering with the company, did not release an assatement. I mean, it was obviously a ploy, guys. It was a clear ploy. But the point they make is that they haven't learned their lesson because the another company is doing the same thing. I'm trying to find the name really quickly. I'm missing it in here. But right this moment, and it looks, it says it jumped 8%. In OVO, of course, I wasn't sure if it was Salafi or in OVO. We just talked about in OVO as well. This is one of the other groups involved. They did the same thing. They released a similarly ridiculous, unsubstantiated version of how this might be successful. And they stopped even after realizing they just got fooled from Moderna. Stock jumped 8%. But think about how crazy it is, the how this went down. Right? So it starts off where Trump appoints this guy, which is already ridiculous as he's literally invested in Moderna, which I can't, I'm really interested to find out ties back to Trump's investments of all this stuff. I find it absolutely ridiculous. There's not somehow benefiting him. If he's willing to appoint this guy, I mean, talk about this is like the swamp. I mean, there's no way to pretend. I mean, this is the obscene and I already pointed this out that they're saying, oh, keep your enemies closer. Like every time he brings on like the worst of the worst, it's all, it bring your enemies closer, right? Oh, these guys don't see it. It's all so clear. Enemy's closer, right? It's just stupid. Talk about a childish naive side step. The enemies closer is not to apply to every, if you're literally in a, in a nest, an administration full of enemies, that doesn't apply. That's stupid. The idea is to have an enemy closer in your friend's circle. That's what that analogy is supposed to mean. Trump is literally building an administration full of the worst of the worst. So he appoints this guy. He then lets the stock rise after the ridiculous claim. He sells it all, makes a huge profit, and then almost instantaneously it drops all the way back down and even further. And I mean, we'll see things like this. We'll see, oh, conflict adventures. How we should talk about it, and then it will quickly go away because they're all doing the same thing. All of them are capitalizing on your situation while people in all of us, the peons, the plebs of the world are suffering and waiting and uncertain and scared while they continue to maximize profit and scoop up all the business and take up all the money. Just like 2008, by the way, apparently we didn't learn our lesson or at least they didn't care to learn it because they didn't need to. Why? Because they, the hierarchy in slain in you, if you need an acronym there, benefited in every possible way. As far as I remember, one person actually went to jail of 2008 and he was an absolute strawman. I'm going to start today by kind of painting you a picture of specifically in this case, I guess it would be revolving around Moderna because that seems to be leading the charge in the vaccine discussion, but I want to paint you a picture for what the people surrounding this company and how the infiltration of the administration and all the people surrounding it and on all sides and everywhere as, but how that pertains to every single one of these companies that we're dealing with today. But Moderna right now seems to be the most interesting as it pertains to today and the crazy overlap between the people not just financially invested, but just invested in ways that would blow your mind. The kind of things that are malicious, nefarious, like the next level of discussions that people would say, that can't be true, but you end up finding out that they tend to be. But I also want to point out right before I begin, there seems to be a little bit of a little bit of lag today with YouTube. So I hope there's no connectivity issues, but just a heads up as always for those that may be just discovering this channel right now. We are broadcasting on about five, maybe I think seven different platforms right now. So if you're ever tired with this platform or tired of the lag or tired of the censorship or tired with the suppression and all the crazy things they do to keep the truth from you, we're on D live and we're on rock fin and we're on bright beyond and we're on all kinds of different things. So right this moment, find one of those if you're unhappy with where you are. But if there are any lag issues today, make sure you find us still because the stream will continue even if YouTube decides to try to stop it. Now I want to start today with a focus on Moderna in regard to what the company is before we get into the ties around it all. And really today it gets into some pretty creepy stuff towards the end. So I hope you guys will stay tuned about the horrible things we're going to go over today, which will blow your mind that happened before all this started and then to show you really clearly why that should make you so alarmed about what they're doing now. And this is even if you think all this is real, the reality of what they're driving in and the just disregard for privacy and constitutional rights is baffling. I mean, I'm not surprised at all. This is what they've what I have been telling every this is what they're going to do and that turned out that we're right. But the point is I'm still baffled that it's happening at such a quick pace and so in your face right now. But we'll start with the company itself and why it's actually it's pretty staggering to realize this company seemingly doesn't do much. They don't make much. They don't really accomplish anything. But yet they've been around and they've been financed using your tax dollars for a long time. Maybe it's because there's quite a bit more going on here. Now let's start with this article coming from John Rappeport yet again, always great. And I really do always hope that you guys will take the time to check out his website because he has some really great work going back long before this started. Moderna and the COVID vaccine, what kind of luminacy? And he says it's completely correct to say that and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the under the National Institute of Health, right? They've been regard to the doctor Fauci and all the same people we're talking about to say that they will reap a profit on the Moderna vaccine. There are six NIA, I'm just going to say NIA scientists who work for Dr. Fauci, each of whom would get $150,000 a year indefinitely as their reward. So that's $900,000 to his subordinates every year in perpetuity. Let's just not let's just be honest, not pretend that that's not an obvious profit motive there for all these people like because the whole the way the reasoning starts with that, right? The reasoning begins with this point is because right now there's this error about how it's like offensive to suggest that anybody in a fissure with anyone wearing a white lab coat would ever dare to do something that's not in your best interest. Anyone who anyone who's not six years old or blinded by mainstream media propaganda is very aware that that's ridiculous. People have motivations, humans have motivations. This is usually one of the leading motivators. So the idea that that's there, even if you don't want to believe that they would do it, like pick something that was dangerous and because it was profitable, read by that even if there was a choice between two of them and one of them maybe a little bit less what they'd make a billion dollars, they probably lean into that one thinking to themselves and rationalizing, well, it's still safe though, right? See the point there that they will shake, they make choices. Money does this. Now, I'm not saying we know for sure that these people are doing that, but realize that there's a profit motive. This is why you buy a, would you buy a used car from the company called Moderna? The US government has shelled out $500 million to this Massachusetts face biotech firm for a COVID vaccine. Now realize guys, this is your, this is your money. You are paying for this. Now first of all, we have to realize that that's not something we all agree upon. That's not something that we all even believe in, but yet you're still paying for it based on what? That's a good question from Forbes. May 8th, it says quote, if a big bet for the 10 year old company, which currently has 24 products in its pipeline, but nothing yet on the market, it's interesting that a company that doesn't have, that has never actually officially created something that anyone has used on the market is yet the leading, excuse me, the leading company in regard to this. Now, the point would be that's obviously in my opinion because of the connections we're going to get into next, the, all of it, the whether we're talking Fauci or, or, or Slowy or anyone of people we're going to get into next, all the different people that are tied into all of this, that have every step of the way are in positions to lean into Moderna because they benefit from it, just like the doctors were talked about. But these people are in official positions. People like Robert Langer, we're going to get to next. Now the biotech sports, a huge market cap. Might as you never making something that's ever gone to market, but yet they're evaluated at 17.5 billion dollars. We see this happening all the time today with the way that our system functions. It's quite ridiculous that because you're on the inside, things just tend to go your way. But it posted a, get this, not ever making a product, market at seven or valued at 17.5 billion dollars, but posted a net loss of $514 million on revenues of just 60 million last year. Well they lost 500, so the government gave them $500 million of your money and they lost that plus 14 million more on that year. Just think about that. And yet this is the company we're leaning into. Why will because we need this and it's so important then because right, just everything goes out the window when you're fearful, when there's danger, when we can point to something and say, because danger, we don't have to care that this company's failed and it doesn't predict and it's not making money and it keeps me, it's ridiculous. But because they want it to succeed, well now because they have a fear motive, they can just ignore this. The same reason they can say, well, yes, you've got constitutional rights, but because fear because virus, we're just going to put that on hold for a minute. Does anybody agree with that? Some people are fearful enough to say that that's the right thing to do, but I argue that no one agrees with that. And most of that incoming cash came from government's grants and research collaborations with big pharmaceutical companies. Right? Again, so these companies that have invested interest in profiting from the way this is going. Now, Moderna has never put a single market or a product, excuse me, into the marketplace. Again, lost $414 million. It took $60 million. So understand there that they made money, right? So they paid themselves salaries, they gave themselves bonuses, they paid from your $4 tax dollars, even though they lost $514 million. But somehow is worth billions. The COVID vaccine is working on utilizing brand new RNA technology. Again, the thing that's never been used, never been officially licensed for human use, never even been tested on humans until now. And by the way, this is something they've been trying to do for a decade or more and have been failing over and over and over. And suddenly we're going to do it by next year because we have to. Even though they've suddenly, they weren't really trying before and now they're really trying. Clearly there's something weird going on here. I argue whether or not they succeed, it's not really going to matter. No RNA drug or vaccine product has ever been certified for public use. Other companies have tried and failed. Moderna is partnering with the National Institute of Allergy and Efectious Diseases, the federal agency, head by Tony Fauci. Partnering with them. I mean, it's just, this would be the equivalent of having any other industry and having the person who's choosing which one will make the money partnering with one of them, but pretending to be like we're totally objective though. We're still considering Salafi and, you know, we owe and all the rest of them, but we're partnering with Moderna. That's not a conflict of interest there. Don't worry. As he says, how many red flags do you need? Seriously guys? How many red flag? I mean, think about the conflict of interest on its face right now. Just remember, this is supposed to be against the rules against the law. This doesn't matter when you're in the government though, apparently. Now what he points out here are the real, the real obvious things. One, Fauci and Gates and others are itching to get the RNA product approved for public use. And they have, I mean, that's pretty clear based on their stance. Now, again, remember, I want to say to think clear off the bat that you guys have known if you're watching this channel that suggesting that Fauci and Gates are responsible or involved in what the, in the negative things that are happening, which I completely agree with, is not to suggest one that the other people we want to suggest are not, and two that they're not tied back to those same people. Right? I mean, this is the, this is the, oh, this is the frustratingly ignorant and simplified reduced narrative because people want to pin it onto one group and try to omit responsibility from all the other people around that. What you're going to see right after we get past this is the connections that go from everyone to everyone, from Trump to Salawi, from Salawi to Moderna, from Moderna to, I mean, it goes all the way around the circle, right? Moderna to Gates, Moderna to Fauci, right? This is the point. Now you could argue that he is a bumbling fool that's not aware of what's happening and they're tricking in the whole time. I'm not sure why that's any better. And I can give you that. But at the end of the day, he is responsible as the president of the United States. He is responsible, trick or not. Right? This is the, this is the ridiculous narrative here. So Fauci and Gates, I completely agree or somebody we should, or people we should be concerned about right now. And I would say that about anybody in these positions, especially these two. As you guys have been watching this show, you should know by now. You guys probably know from the beginning of this, I wasn't actually very familiar with Fauci when this started. And I said in the beginning, he struck me as kind of just an average normal guy. Well, obviously that's changed over the time in my opinion based on his history and where he is and how much he's involved. And the interesting dynamics between all the other people we talked to. But just think about that going forward. But so he says, Fauci Gates and others are itching to get this product approved, approved, a genetically modifying vaccine, right? Think about that. Even if they stay at safe for a year or two years, we don't know 10 years down the line. You might not just grow a third head or excuse me. That made sense. A lot of sense. A second head or a third leg or anything else. I'm trying to be funny, but the point is that the idea of genetic modification as crazy as that may have sounded is absolutely what we're talking about here. Things that may end up happening down the line, they don't know because we've never done this before. But because virus, we have to eat not even do we have to just brush past even the things they pretend they already do, right? All the safety things that we know that they aren't doing. So they just brush past the things that they already weren't doing. So nothing really changed. They just pretended they didn't do them. Right? And I'll show you why. I'm going to go over the eye can thing once again. It says, thus they can flood the world with all sorts of new vaccines at the drop of a hat. That's what they want. Now you could argue that this could be profit, right? For a lot of people that are just breaking free of the make the main stream propaganda matrix, that's what makes sense to them. And that's part of it always profit is always a huge factor. But there's more to it. In my opinion, the idea that they would flood this even even I mean, I would say the next most obvious and accepted reality is that these people are open about the idea that we need to diminish the population for the safety of all of us. Now think about how much that reflects on what they're saying today. We need to destroy the economy and destroy your small business and destroy your normal life for the safety of all of us, right? Even if you're not sick, because that guy sick, we need to hurt you to make sure we're all equally suffering and not all of us suffering a lot for some of us are not at all. We need to keep it even keel suffering, right? That's the idea. Same thing, right? So the idea is that we need to remove them and Bill Gates has said this openly numerous times that these with we make these vaccines, right? We can effectively get this population down by so and so percent. He said this numerous times on record. So the idea of wanting to be in a position to be able to flood the world with these things that you're in control of that they're not testing for that they're making profit from is not that far fetched. But we're not all to talk about it, right? You don't get any actual engage discussion with interesting, like if we could sit down with somebody who actually is intelligent, but disagrees and have an actual intellectual discussion and then have people listen and come to their own conclusions. That's called in that's called an informed populace, right? That's one of the real tenants and foundational point what we need actually have a representative government, but they we don't. And that's why they make sure of that. We're not allowed to have that. You can't express your opinions. You can't go online and say, I think this, I think this is fake. This might be a lie. Today you get censored for it. If it's in certain topics that they're very, very attentive to such as coronavirus, I mean, just think about how crazy that is, especially coming from a government that's we know for a fact has lied to us about situations just like this. Think about how literally insane that is. It's like having a guy who you know into murder, who into prison for murder and they come out and there's a bunch of people around the person who was killed and they just tell you, you just you can't even talk about that guy who was the murderer. He's just off the beat. Can't look at him, right? Not allowed. And if you talk about him, we're going to put you in jail. It's like, well, geez, the guy's a murderer. Why wouldn't we think that? Right? And then the guy comes forward and tells you, no, it's not, I mean, you see where I'm going. It's crazy to not do something slapping you in the face. The one person we shouldn't be trusting and we're not allowed to, the question, I should say. Number two, if Fauci can ram through his partner, Moderna's vaccine and get it approved and released, his heroic status among the dumb down public with skyrocket even higher. Now I argue, first of all, the idea that he's this heroic figure, I'm not sure about that. I know that there's a lot of people on one side of the false two party paradigm that definitely sees him as some kind of like counter to Trump's, I don't know, lies or deceptions or ignorance as they would see it. I definitely agree with some of that. But the point is, I don't even think within that that they see him as some kind of heroic figure, but maybe I'm wrong. Definitely on the other side, they don't. So to make it kind of a broad statement like that, I kind of disagree with, but his point is still the same. Right? So if he does this, a huge fraction of people will say he's a hero. He made it. He did it. He got it through. He could write his own ticket, as he says, head of the giant national student of health of health, director general of the World Health Organization. Three, does Fauci stand to gain a personal fortune from his connection with Moderna? If the COVID RNA vaccine is approved, he says, I don't know, but of course, and this is what we always have to consider, guys. Just because there's not something overtly on the book, something on its face saying, this guy has a profit motive here. He says a quiet, backdoor money deal involving Fauci would be a simple proposition and especially coming from a group that we know is corrupt from a government that we know is corrupt from companies that we know are corrupt. Let's not pretend that they wouldn't say, hey, here's some money behind the scenes for you to make sure this gets in. Now maybe he's got morals and would say no, or maybe not. The point is we're not even allowed to consider things like this today. But this is a company that we're talking about. Doesn't, it hasn't really made anything. They make the gets, that your money and then spends it all and gives themselves money and then loses it. And is trying to force in something that's never been tested that's completely unverified that probably doesn't work at all. Based on their own research, right? I mean, he didn't say that and get you censored, but that's based on actual research from up until now. It has not worked. So thinking all of this, remember where we are right now. This is the company we're talking about. This is the company that the new vaccine is are, by the way, that Donald Trump put in position, right? The guy who was on, was previously on the board of directors for Moderna. The guy who sold $12.4 million in Moderna stock after releasing, not him personally, but after the company released a ridiculous, I guess, study preliminary of only eight people. It was a safety study, but it wasn't even about safety. They said, look, we have antibodies maybe. And suddenly it's, it jumps almost 30%. He sells $12.4 million in stock and then the next day it drops down back below where it was. Almost like it was completely planned. Nonetheless, I mean, I wouldn't even argue. I wouldn't even say for sure that, I mean, look, at the end of the day, this is a crazy conflict of interest and it ties back directly to Donald Trump that which then ties to Moderna. What, which then ties to Fauci? So look, if we're going to pretend that Trump is completely innocent of all this, why then would he put this man on there? Okay, you could argue that he was a yet again fooled. This guy's being fooled quite a damn bit. You would have to have to point out or he's a willing participant. Massive conflict of interest for Salawi, right? That's just something we have to very clearly see. And you could jump to the next one. We have Robert Langer working. It was a professor at MIT who's on the board of directors now for Moderna. This is the guy that we just talked about right here, Robert Langer. The guy that they're currently saying is the, the, the, or the main's remedial, I should say is saying that he is the common denominator in several coronavirus efforts. Right? So I mean, so it's interesting, right? And then you, what's that you're asking how does that connect to what we were just saying? Well, you come to find out that he is working on the technology behind the draw, what the, the project behind the coronavirus idea behind using the nanotechnology in the vaccines, which will then be used to fight the virus, which is something that leads back to DARPA, which leads back to Bill Gates, which leads back to Jeffrey Epstein, which leads back to all these people. The technology behind it draws partly on Langer's insights into nanoparticles. So he's at MIT working on nanotechnology. Those particles visible only with an electron microscope form tiny droplets that protect RNA molecules on their way to cells. Quite interesting, wouldn't you say? So he's working on the very thing that they're trying to drive forward. Okay? Back over here to Langer again on the, remember, he's on the Moderna board. The, the board of the vaccine company that they're trying to drive forward that the vaccines are himself has had money invested in was on the board of working with Trump appointed. He's working on the technology they're trying to use to put into these vaccines, which is openly being discussed right now. And don't forget that Bill Gates himself made donations to MIT through Jeffrey Epstein. And I hope you should read this article. If you have the time, here are all the tech moguls connections that's ridiculous, right? Right this moment we should be able to realize how crazy it is. And so, I'm sure that Bill Gates is still where he is with all of the overties. I mean, the guy had ties to Jeffery Epstein after the fact when he was after he was arrested and charged for pedophilia and sex trafficking. So clearly Gates had no problem with that. So he used him to donate to MIT, right? And remember that Epstein himself has tie the whole, as Whitney Webb reported on this show, the idea that we're talking about somebody who was trying to reframe himself as this, this tech and the critic financier, right? He was always talking about leaving the idea was that put his Epstein stamp on humanity forever, right? Using technology, the idea of technology, the idea of these exact kind of research focuses, right? The same thing, ties to MIT, ties to Harvard. Epstein, we talked about this already. And it ties, then we talk about Charles Labor, the man who worked at Harvard as a professor, also working on nanotechnology, working on what you're looking at right here in regard to planting, like basically nanotechnology that can be put into viruses, right? That could then essentially mimic viruses, which again could be literally what we're dealing with right now, which is certainly, I mean, if we have to consider if this is something that they were working on, right before all this started, that that's essentially possibly what we're dealing with right now. And maybe that's why this is all being so hush hushed and covered up. Now, remember, this nanotech part is where we're going to get into next, which is why I find this so incredibly relevant. But what I'm trying to show you now is the clear ties to all of these people back to the center stage. Then we have Robert Cadleck. The guy I remember we talked about in regard to the anthrax vaccines in regard to bio-emergent solutions, the company that was making the anthrax vaccines before, and there's acutely tied in with the whole anthrax false flag and everything before 9-11 and all the lies that were told then. Knowingly, remember I told you before, they lost a lawsuit, the pentagon, because they forcefully gave vaccines to people during the anthrax fear that they knew, knew we're going to hurt people and they lost that lawsuit. That was Robert Cadleck, that's who you're looking at. He is also the assistant director of the secretary of the Health and Human Services right now, which by the way, as we just talked about, has complete control. Right now, the sole person you're looking at has complete control over the strategic national stockpile, which means he gets to choose which ones we use, such as vaccines, such as PPE, such as massive profit motive. Right? And this is a guy who knowingly hurt people with vaccines before and he's choosing. So do you think he's going to be concerned with Moderna? Do you think he's going to quibble about pro-possible issues that knew with safety tests? I mean, I'll leave it for you to make your own decision on that. I think you have to base it on his past actions in the exact same position, knowingly hurting people with vaccines that he knew for a fact were not safe and put him out anyway. More than once mind you, more than once. And that's on top of this, which we talked about the other day. This is a actual lawsuit, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, and this is from 2018. But what this showed and still shows to this day, the informed consent action network, they discovered with their FOIA request and actually, and they put a FOIA request in order to get the safety records that were required due to the, what is it called again? I'm not seeing it right here. The 1986 Act right here, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. So this was something that mandated that they had to produce safety reports every two years for these vaccines and show where they were trying to improve. So the, I can said we want to see these things. And for eight months, they refused even though they were obligated because of FOIA request because we pretend that they're somehow obligated to do that. And they were just refusing to say, screw it, we don't care about your FOIA request, we're not going to show you. Gee, I wonder why they would do that. Well, we found out because after a lawsuit that lawsuit you're staring at here, I can made force them. They forced them via the lawsuit to, to provide the copies. The safety reports to Congress or admit that they never filed the reports. Now the result of the lawsuit as we just pointed out was that health and human services. Right, the very people we're talking about right now and Robert Cadillac had to finally and shockingly admit that it never, not even once, submitted a single biennial report to Congress detailing the improvements in the vaccine safety. This speaks volumes to the seriousness by which safety, vaccine safety is treated at health and human services. By the way, again, we know that that doesn't matter because this is the very guy who knowingly pushed out a vaccine for anthrax that hurt people. So what's not be shocked by the fact that he's not doing any safety studies, that's probably part and parcel we're talking about. Well, you can't do safety studies on something you know is unsafe, so it's all the same thing. This is just a reinforcement of the same narrative that they don't care, that they're hiding stuff, not doing their job because it's about something other than actually helping you. And it heightens the concern that HHS doesn't have a clue as to the actual safety profile of the now 29 doses and growing of vaccines given by one year of age. Now, remember, this was in 2007, 18. I mean, so it's way more than 29 doses now, but reflect on this that health and human services. This guy right here. And of course, Alex Azar, who's the secretary, the very guy who's involved as well, the very guy that I talked about recently went to Donald Trump in January talking about this and Trump only wanted to talk about vaping, which again, cyber yourself with that ultimate means. But this is the same group completely in control of the strategic national stockpile, the same group that's not doing their job. Now, the argument that they make, by the way, which I find all just laugh out loud. First of all, just laugh at the Wikipedia page and what they how they frame this. First of all, this is called the informed consent action network, right? Not saying anything other than the fact that we should have the right if you understand what informed consent means to be informed about the possible benefits and negatives and then come to your own decision on it. That's informed consent. That's supposed to be a pillar of foundational principle of our medical found system, but we don't care about that today. And this is what it says about it on Wikipedia. The informed consent action network is one of the main anti vaccine groups in the United States. By the way, that's not at all what they are. Now, you could they try to frame it that way because people like Dell big tree are the ones coming out and calling out the obvious faults that we're calling out now as well. With it would be Vax and all the same stuff. This is this is the same problem. The same thing they tried to expose during Vax and the same thing that got covered up then even even despite all of the hard data, the hard evidence, the smoking gun. And again, reflect on how how crazy that is the kind of all encompassing control that that shows you that they can have we can be showing you the data and the entirety of the mainstream media can shout it down and say your fight say it's fake your false. It's conspiracy theory. They're all they're fighting for informed consent. Dell big tree himself will argue that there are uses for vaccines and some of them are beneficial and it's kind of the same ideas about the intent behind them. Now for I should be clear for all I know he's changed is I haven't been watching bell big tree exclusively. Maybe he's changed the opinion, but that's what I remember him saying in the past. So here they are saying it's just an anti Vax group talk about reductive not even close to what they're saying. So that's just a lie pretty much found in 2006 by Dell big tree. It says it spreads myths about the risks of vaccines and contributes to the vaccine hesitancy. This is why Wikipedia is an absolute joke. This is why people in college are told you're not allowed to use Wikipedia as a source even though every single thing you look at on I thought that was a video I had up. Well every single thing you look at as I lose my place on YouTube about COVID-19 will link to a Wikipedia page or anything else that you're talking about right. It's because they want you to go through this why because that's controlled by them. As all colleges anywhere will tell you you're not allowed to because it's not definitive because it's not actually a source. It's manipulated by people who have engend us. Does it spread spreads myths or you could also frame that as they tell you the actual reality of the things that the government doesn't want you to hear. Yeah, of course they spread myths which has been identified by the World Health Organization as one of the 10 top global threats. Understand that that's a real deal right there that the World Health Organization is saying that vaccine hesitancy is one of the largest risks 10 global health threats. Think about how scary that is. They are building this right now in front of you. Now here's the point. The lawsuit they talk about right here and of course they make a point to put this in there because they have to challenge it. Here's what it says in 2018 I can file the Freedom of Information lawsuit to force the FDA and the National Institute of Health and the Department of Health and Human Services to release administrative reports on childhood vaccine injury. That HHS is required to file with Congress. So right off the bat HHS is legally required to do so. This isn't some kind of this is the this that was the law. They didn't do it. So that's that is a yes a fact. No one seems to care about that. See what they say here is HHS replied that they could not find any such reports. Oh well there you go then right. Case closed. They just couldn't find them solid sort of how the Pentagon just can't find trillions of dollars right. This can't find it. Whoops. By the way even if they can't find them they still broke the law by not submitting them. But see nobody cares about this because it's all about making this I can group seem like crazy conspiracy theorists. It says well I can claimed the absence of these reports means that the federal government has neglected to properly study the effects of vaccines. This and the fact checking site bullet effect. God just the last place we should be looking pointed out a large number of in-depth studies were undertaken and their results shared with the public even though HHS failed to file their reports. So all they can say is oh well yeah they didn't do what they were supposed to but look there's studies over here that said generally what they should have done. Oh okay. Let me think about how crazy that is. They don't they just they're just skipping over the fact that for since 1986 they have failed to do even once what they were obligated to do by law because of safety for vaccines. And all Wikipedia can say is oh well they claimed it was some conspiracy but look here's a report that says one thing that's also backed by government. You know funded by government money. They didn't do what they were supposed to guys that's a pretty damn obvious point. This is the reality. This is the truth. They did not do what they were supposed to they're not doing it now. So when people like this are in positions who have done this before who are in HHS who have ties to Moderna who have ties to Donald Trump who have ties to Robert Langer who have ties to the vaccines are all in this little club circling around the problem. We need to see the reality and how it ties back to Trump ties back to Fauci ties back to Gates ties back to everybody including again Charles Lieber. This is the important one though in regard to the topic today right the idea that this is about the nanotechnology and what this is leading toward. This is the idea of the technology today. This is where this is being driven toward and the whole illusion of the bio defense system which is bio warfare making weapons and pretending you're defending us with vaccines that are made from those weapons which makes no sense as anyone honest will tell you we can see that this is about creating a control matrix about all the things that they have constantly been trying to force in. Now remembering Lieber and the nanotech and Harvard and all the same stuff I want you to think about this as we bring to the next topic. Now this is something that was shared with me by Weta coalition dot org and I'll show you his website we get to the end here. Does great work by the way and this is something he shared with me a while back now right off the bat and you can tell you himself I was very suspicious about this the logo alone I'm like this is fake it can't be this can't be real it's obviously a ridiculous job I mean that the logo looks stupid but this is legitimate I've went through this myself and I can as much as I can tell as much as we can tell anything is legitimate today I'll show you why right now but this is the point for future strategic issues future warfare circa night to 20 25. This was this was this was produced and published 28 days before 9 11 2001 28 days before 9 11 2001 the whole thing as you can see the slides here micro dust weaponry some explosive smart dust opportunities trust me it's way worse than that I'm going to go through some slides for you but here's the opening just so you can see the beginning. Now I agree that the slides look interesting and looked almost cheesy but as I witnessed and I spoke earlier and a lot of different people I spoke with the idea is most of these government sites do look pretty low grade and I'll show you someone's been going through it but just before we get into what these actually show you and why it's so incredibly related to what's going on right now and that they were planning this and talking about this all the way back in 2001 and you could argue that 9 11 was maybe their first attempt at rolling this out and this is the second attempt right just like Trump said I don't know so many months ago that what we really need is another 9 11 like event to bring the country together weird that's not alarming at all sort of how with the project new the project for new American century document rebuilding America's defenses also said way back then that we need another Pearl Harbor like event to bring the country together up and then right after that we saw 9 11 and then oops after Trump said that we saw this happening interesting right now this is document about what they're seeing for the future and what they're planning to do and how they're planning to use this now this wasn't meant to be seen this was pulled off the Department of Defense website as I understand it but it wasn't something that was completely put out for the world to see now but this is not necessarily stuff that they keep sacred as again I'll show you one pick up through the slides that this is something that they do all the time it just never gets reported on it also doesn't mean as a matter of fact this is something that they are planning to do but rather just something that was being proposed right but we have to consider that this is always on the table things that they are actively working for because of all the different things we've already shown you the DARPA information the things that they're currently working on injectable nanoplatforms the injectable gels the quantum die tattoo things these are things that they're working on now so remember that this isn't some hypothetical conspiracy theory they're literally doing them the point to see here now is that they were doing this in 2001 and all this stuff is what they're now justifying because it helps quite coronavirus but that's just because that's the excuse being used today so as we go forward I want you to first of all actually I was going to go through this first so you can see the information below it and this this is on internet internet archive site all the links for this will be in the show notes when you're technically their post on the website right now now it says that Dennis M. Bushnell this is the person who works at NASA Langley Research Center I got a lot of Langley Research Center and it says that he is the chief scientist at NASA Langley Research Center and it goes on with his information and it says the above presentation was given on August 14 2001 at the fourth annual testing and training for readiness symposium and exhibition organized by the National Defense Industrial Association the NDIA right that's what's important okay so as we go through it and this well is going to show you this is him so you can see first of all that he definitely is part of NASA right here as you can see right up here is the website this is where it was pulled from this is in the way that machine right but this is the website