The Dimming, Full Length Climate Engineering Documentary

Video Transcript:

Perhaps the greatest lie ever perpetrated on populations all over the world is the condensation trail lie. What we're seeing in our skies is not condensation. It's sprayed particulate dispersions with very few exceptions. They shouldn't be there. Jet engines burn clean. So if there's anything coming out of them, it's an additive. They're absolutely not contrails. Contrails do not linger, dissipate and go into cloud coverage. Period in the report. And I kept saying to people, you know, what is this? Because now the sky is no longer blue. It's starting to turn gray. And what I found was kind of like it was not socially acceptable. You know, we're all going to pretend this is not really happening. And I thought, oh, this is very bad. Most are unfamiliar with a science term called global dimming. That term refers to the amount of direct sunlight that no longer reaches the surface of the planet due to light scattering particles that are building up in the atmosphere. And although many of these particles are from industrialized pollution, the larger majority are from the ongoing climate engineering solar radiation management operations. This engine, a high bypass turbofan jet engine. This is the engine that is on all military takers and all commercial carriers. Is an essence of jet powered fan. 90% of the air that moves through this engine is non-combust. This engine by design is nearly incapable of producing any condensation trail except under rare and extreme circumstances. And again, we have film footage of aircraft flying at altitude with nozzles visible. Turning on and off. That is the end of the argument. Since even before man could fly, there was an effort to try to modify the weather. We have weather modification patents going back 100 years plus. These are historical films of what can be done with a biplane, a small biplane that carries a very small payload. And that much can be done. How much more can a fully-loaded military tank or casing to encase in 135, C-17 glow bastard? How much more material can they put in here? About 500 times more than the single tanker? In regard to the condensation trail narrative, many refer back to the trails left by World War II bombers as proof that we are only seeing condensation trails in our skies. But you can only watch that award found on military archives, film footage which we posted of World War II B-17s at altitude turning off a sprayed dispersion. We know that climate adhering was deployed immediately after World War II, so testing was absolutely ongoing. Clearly, these bombers were used for beta testing. Film footage proves it. Weather was a weapon used over Vietnam. Would you expect that to be then deleted from the availability? No. To continue to expand the scientific aspects of it, to have it available in your portfolio of weapons, would be a natural process. Therefore, should you expect that it is available on demand to have the ability to modify weather absolutely within this country and others? Climate and Gering is the crown jewel of the military industrial complex. Climate and Gering has been used to destabilize and topple nations all over the globe, facilitating military occupations by hostile countries like the U.S. We know that some of these countries are having their precipitation cut off because they have stated so on the floor of the U.N. Like the President of Iran stating infatically that NATO weather modification programs were cutting off the precipitation to Iran, but U.S. media never covered it. We have an economic model operating globally which is operating based on covert force. And I have very serious questions after watching the financial patterns as to whether that financial force or that force includes weather warfare. People were coming to me telling me about this. So because of that, I went to the government in Ottawa under freedom of information. There was a 40-page report of which half the pages were completely blank and the other half had a lot of blank outs. But there was sufficient information to tell me that, yeah, they're aware. They call it geoengineering. One of the big problems is that when we find some new technology, we get all excited by it, by the potential benefits of that technology. And often implement it and use the technology before we have any idea of the negative effects. Shouldn't it be considered that every breath we take is laden with highly toxic particles that are wreaking havoc in our own bodies? Particles that aren't being reported by any air quality testing systems, any official air quality testing are looking for PM 10 or PM 2.5, 2.5 microns at best. The climate engineering nanoparticulants are exponentially smaller. They go virtually unreported. These nanomaterials generate reactive oxygen species in biological materials, damaged tissue, lead to advanced aging, caused cancer, causative agents of dementia. So, yeah, we might think that we're doing something positive for humanity to save our species, but we're also poisoning ourselves. Eventually, with the team that we formed with geoengineering watch that were, we were able to acquire ANOA flying lab. We were able to test at altitude to confirm the elements that were showing up at the surface. Our intention was to do a point-to-point sampling mission. We could see these obvious patterns that were being laid out in the sky. We were really thankful for the opportunity to be able to get up to altitude. And on the return mission, we noticed that cloud layer had descended. And we sampled below the cloud layer. We sampled through that confluent layer and above it. We found exactly the same elements listed in climate engineering patterns. The same elements we found on countless surface tests of precipitation from all over the globe. The same elements we found on countless surface tests of precipitation from all over the globe. The same elements we found on countless surface tests of precipitation from all over the globe. Governments all over the globe and the entire climate science community are telling the population urgently that climate engineering operations, solar radiation management operations need to be immediately deployed to try to mitigate the warming of our planet, to try to preserve what's left of its life support systems. And yet when the public, those that are awake, try to bring to the attention of academia and elected officials, that we see climate engineering already being conducted in our skies all over the globe. It's already been deployed, lab test proved, film footage proves it, documents prove it. And yet we have the continued denial from the climate science community and official agencies telling us that we're not really seeing what we're seeing in the skies. They tell us if climate engineering were deployed, it would look exactly like what we're seeing in our skies. But then again, they tell us that we're not really seeing what we are actually seeing. The paradox is the more the climate engineers spray the planet, destroy the ozone layer, disrupt the hydrological cycle, and increase the overall warming of the planet. The more they feel they have to ramp these programs up to try to mitigate some of the damage that these programs have done in the first place, that is the true definition of insanity. As a society, we are like a freight train heading for a broken bridge that, this is a few years away from us. And I think people don't understand the exponential increase of toxicity in the environment. These operations should be considered the most insane endeavor ever deployed by the human race. These operations are systematically derailing all of Earth's life support systems, and the attempt to blot out the sun. The myopic short-term objective of trying to cool the planet while worsening the overall warming, the climate engineers, if these operations are allowed to continue, are pounding the nails into our collective coffins. From a scientific perspective, and what we know about nanomaterials and effect on human health and the environment, this is a serious problem, and it really does warrant further scientific investigation. We need the answers to get to the bottom of this national security problem. If populations around the globe find out what has been done to them by their governments, without their knowledge or their consent, there will be a shock wave around the globe that cannot be contained by the criminal governments that have now taken control of our planet and civilizations all over the world. Just bringing transparency will shift so many things that it will make it extremely difficult, because you cannot manage an entire planet with over-at-force, only with covert force. If we bring transparency to who it is in the covert force, it shifts everything. Look at your own health, and you know what's going on. And if you love your children, join us in fighting what we need to fight, is this a justified, it's a right fight, it's a right cause? And if the climate engineering operations, which are derailing Earth's life support systems, are not immediately exposed and halted, all other challenges for the human race become moot, because the planet will no longer support life. We are in completely uncharted territory. Virtually the entire web of life is being systematically contaminated and decimated, by the ongoing climate engineering operations. On top of all other forms of human activity or anthropogenic activity that are wreaking havoc in the web of life, climate engineering, mathematically, statistically speaking, is the single greatest and most immediate threat we collectively face short of nuclear cataclysm. Sounds like pure science fiction, but there is a growing underground movement of people who believe that our harsh drought is part of a government conspiracy. Here outlandish ideas like weather warfare and climate engineering, in other words, weather control, are accepted as basic fact. Climate engineering is the greatest single assault on the environment ever launched by humanity without question. Dane Wigenton, lead researcher for Geoengineering Watch, is sounding the alarm. Climate engineering, they say, is to blame for the harshest recorded drought in California history. Dane is used to skeptics. He once was one himself. Talk is cheap for those who haven't investigated. I didn't want to believe this either. His background is in solar power, but he started investigating on his own about a decade ago. After becoming suspicious, something was partially blocking the sun's energy from reaching his solar home. They grew up in Southern California, choking the sea of smog. None of the adults around me seemed concerned about the conditions, but for me, life in the toxic merc was intolerable. I have always fully recognized the immense damage being inflicted on the planet by countless forms of human activity. I lectured on anthropogenic global warming. I dreamt of clean air in blue skies. I dreamt of living in untainted wilderness off the grid. I dreamt of planting trees and watching them grow and thrive. I dreamt of coexisting with the wild inhabitants of the forest. I finally made it to the serene setting I had craved for so long. A remote forested mountain top in Northern California. But the dream soon turned to a nightmare. When I began to lose significant amounts of my solar power uptake from my off-grid wilderness home, I knew something was radically wrong. We are officially told that the aircraft emitted trails in our skies that linger spread and sometimes cover the entire horizon are just condensation. But the condensation trail narrative is perhaps the greatest lie ever perpetrated on populations all over the world. It is not possible for condensation to block at times 60, 70, even 80% of my solar power uptake. I began to research the issue of geoengineering, aka climate engineering, programs that governments around the globe and in climate science communities have told us are only proposals. Yet there they were in the skies above me. Even today we are being told falsely by the climate science community that we have one final card to play to try to overt total climate collapse, total planetary meltdown. But this is in fact a lie. Climate engineering, weather modification, patents go back more than 100 years. But all available data indicates that programs were first deployed at scale immediately after World War II and deployed over the polar regions. And the attempt to increase the size of the polar ice packs and thus try to regulate Earth's temperatures. This layer is the predicate in the foundation for the development of a weather satellite that will permit man to determine the world's cloud layer. And ultimately to control the weather and he who controls the weather will control the world. Numerous government documents posted in geongeringwatch.org. Some as much as 800 pages long prove that global governments, even governments that the public perceives as being adversarial. Are in fact colluding and cooperating on the climate engineering issue due to the cross border ramifications you can't climate engineer over your own country without affecting the entire planet. They are all working together on these issues and other governments around the globe are either actively or passively cooperating. Is the government experimenting with our weather? People say the government is up there in airplanes spraying all kinds of chemicals to change or manipulate the weather. It is called geoengineering, fighting global warming by putting a chemical dust in the atmosphere and reflecting harmful radiation back into space. You could use very moxite for example, which makes big fluffy clouds. You could use tiny little bits of aluminum which is benign in the environment and essentially manage the climate. There are 172 bills before the US Senate right now calling for more weather modification programs. A Weather Modification Act calling for research in quote attempting to change or control by artificial methods, the natural development of atmospheric cloud forms. My personal opinion is that we have to keep geoengineering on the table. We have to look at it very carefully because we might get desperate enough to want to use it. There is a line of research on what's called geoengineering which are various techniques that would delay the heating to bias 20 or 30 years to get our act together. The stated goal of some of the world's most recognized geoengineers like Dr. David Keith and Dr. Ken Caldera is to put 10 to 20 million tons of nanoparticulites into global skies annually. That's an inconceivable amount of material. This material is on top of industrialized pollution. This is about how we engineer the planet. It's about the fact, an uncomfortable fact, but it is a fact that we have the technical ability to do this. They are all fast acting, they are cheap and they are fundamentally imperfect. The problems of how you control something where an individual country can have tremendous leverage over the whole planet's climate and where there are winners and losers in ways that really could be unpredictable. I mean, not the frightened you, but I think you could imagine scenarios that lead to war. Another example is the array of technologies often referred to collectively as geoengineering that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection. There's all sorts of ways you could do this, but the standard idea has always been spray sulfuric acid in the stratosphere, 20 kilometers over our head and use that to stop the planet warming up. The example many people cite was when the Mount Pinotubo volcano exploded and all of this ash went into the air and had a cooling effect on the earth. People have long reposed since the mid-60s that you could artificially add dust to the stratosphere and cool the planet. Not that this would be a good solution for global warming, it would not. But it does show the way we're steadily developing the powers to manipulate the planet with comparatives. That's all from the low revisers masking some of the climate warming from CO2. So this is the global dimming or something? Yeah. The leading idea is basically to emulate what big volcanoes do, put material in the stratosphere to reflect sunlight. So the problem is the following. If you add SO2 to the stratosphere, SO2 doesn't condense, so you might want to put aluminum in. And aluminum has a very high-nature fraction, it's very small, it doesn't coagulate, and you can enter your particles and predict your properties. You can get them out of the stratosphere, you can concentrate particles near the poles. Cossars are so cheap that the richest people on the planet could perhaps afford to buy an ice-hatch. It's extraordinarily cheap. I knew it was cheap when I found that they were quoting me in tons. It's also true that particles as they get bigger fall out a lot faster. We sort of step back and think, okay, well, how would you actually make particles in stratosphere? This is really engineering now. If it was aerosols in the stratosphere, it would likely be put there by airplanes, start with a fleet of just two or three kind of modified business jets. The basic idea is that if you let a plume off on an aircraft by just changing some little details, you can actually get much smaller particle size distributions by doing this kind of spraying. So there are all sorts of side effects. I'll get to them in a second. But if you put sulfuric acid in the stratosphere, for example, you could deplete stratospheric ozone. Smaller size means more surface area, but more surface area means less ozone. Oh, this stuff in the stratosphere is going to be killing some number of people who are going to be as sacrificed by the planet. It's an obvious concern. If it kills a million people, we're only going to have one percent more, we're just killing 10,000 more people. You can do math. But that's so killing people is not the objective here. So if I made a decision or there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say the kind of program, I think makes more sense with what about a million tons a year? You might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year, so direct result of that decision. And so the only thing that we can do to cool the planet or that society can do to cool the planet is deploy these sorts of technology. And by the way, it's not really a moral hazard. It's more like free riding on our grind pits. And it means there are going to be winners and losers just like there are winners and losers for CO2. But they're different winners and losers. So this makes the problem if anything harder to solve. You've introduced a matter of dimension of complexity into the managing the planet's climate problem. What we're watching financially is a great deal of public policy being promoted on the theory that we have climate change. And yet in that discussion, we never talk about, well, what's all this spring and how is that involved? Engineering the weather gives you the ability to overcome or prevent droughts. It gives you the ability to inflict them if you don't go along. And the brilliance of inflicting a drought is there's no popular support against you. So this kind of invisible warfare, if it can be done, is very effective. It would seem to me both positive and negative. Imagine if you can predict the weather of a long periods of time how much money you can make. You know, you can trade it. How do you manage money in that world? Many people message me confused and bewildered as to how it is possible that such colossal programs can occur in skies above our heads, programs of climate engineering and solar radiation management that are literally decimating Earth's life support systems. And these programs are not being acknowledged by any official source, not being acknowledged by the climate science community that is indeed betrayed the human race and the entire web of life by their denial of the ongoing climate change. And the people that message me are perplexed at how such atrocities can be ongoing for so many decades. And we have still official denial and we have populations that are all too willing to accept that denial. I began to test for some of the primary elements named in climate engineering solar radiation management patents starting with aluminum, barium and strontium. My test came back from the state certified lab to my dismay. These elements indeed were present in significant amounts and subsequent tests showed higher and higher and higher amounts continuing to escalate until one test was as high as 3,450 parts per billion of aluminum. This is highly toxic rain. I knew my life would never be the same because I can't let the other way. It's completely intolerable for me to live under toxic skies. And what about the trees? What about the bats? The bears? The birds? The bees? They have no voice except for us. I began to try to bring this issue to light from that moment on. Initially, few would listen, few would look at the data. But as time went on and as more and more people woke up along the way and realized the significance of attempting to play God with the weather and engineer Earth's life support systems, more individuals from different arenas joined the effort to try to sound the alarm. I want to tell you that we're in very great danger from the pollution that's coming down over us. And we've been led astrayed by the military and industrial complex and they're responsible for the cloud's creation and weather manipulation programs. I sacrificed four years of my life defending the people of my country just to come home and find there are greater threats here domestically. There's something going on. I don't know who it is or why they're doing it. All I can testify is it's not natural and it's not normal. Now the aluminum content of rain should be zero. And there's a lot of argument that aluminum is very common to be found but aluminum is only common in a bonded form. It's not common in a free form and we're finding high rates of free aluminum. Because you can spread so many small little particles through the environment. It dramatically increases the surface area that's in that environment. Because there's so many of them when you look up at the sun you see a white haze that is aluminum floating in the air right now and it's coming from the aircraft. Solar radiation management SRM to block the sun. That's the stated purpose. The consequences don't seem to be considered with these programs but that is the stated purpose on almost all UN and global governance documents for these programs. And in the past five years I've seen the number of patients with Alzheimer's disease Parkinson's and other neurodegenerative diseases tremendously increased almost quadruple. The United States code says you cannot experiment on the American public and if you do you got to report it to Congress within 30 days. Where's the proof that you did that? But it's also to get the media to start reporting on this. So all of us have a consequence that we may not be aware of and it is important for all of us to join together and to put a stop to these programs and to hold public discussions on them for as much as possible. And I want all of you to know that it's important that we realize that this is not normal and natural that these are programs, experimental programs that are being conducted at this time and we all have to stand up and say no. This tank can be used for disseminating all types of agents. Addy crops spray from aircraft using the arrow X to A has proved very effective in field trials. For larger planes the Air Force has perfected spray equipment. This B17 has several spraying nozzles and carries the tank in the bomb bay. I'm Charles Jones, Brigadier General, the US Air Force retired. In the years 1953 through 1962 I was stationed in Germany. Then we moved to England in 1959 while assigned to the 42nd Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron with dual missions of electronic countermeasures and weather reconnaissance. We also had the responsibility of reporting jet engine contrails throughout our area of responsibility in Europe, North Africa, the Mediterranean and Eastern Atlantic. We were responsible for pinpointing exact allitudes of all jet engine contrails noted within the flying area of responsibility in both the weather and EC Amerikraft missions. We became experts on jet engines and aircraft contrails and all of their characteristics. Much different from the white aircraft spray trails that consist of scientifically verifiable strain of aluminum particles and other toxic heavy metals, polymers and chemical components. These are the long white spray trails that linger and slowly expand into light cloud cover that soon cover entire areas with an overcast very light cloud cover. We're never going to get to the bottom of climate change until everything is laid on the table about geoengineering and the disasters that it can and is causing. My name is Richard Rolig. I served a career of 34 years in the United States Air Force. I was able to achieve the rank of Major General. I was in the acquisition business of developing new weapon systems and did lead one major top secret program for three years. During the 10 years I worked at Raytheon, the exposure to various programs was limited to what they wanted you to work on. So even though I still had the top secret clearance and certain programs I got exposed to, that was not one of them. That was compartmentalized as it should be and unless you had a direct impact or you were personally involved in it, you would not have received that particular clearance. It goes back to around October of 17. I'm residing near an Air Force Base here in Tucson, Arizona, Davis, Montham Air Force Base. Aircraft, exiting, doing their flight training, etc. and having lived around Air Force my whole life, my father even being a pilot. It became obvious to me that the contrails that were coming out of some of the aircraft in the local area were not normal looking. They took on a different texture, they spread differently and so as a result I started talking to a couple ex pilots that are part of the organizations, asked them to look at it. My wife is a pilot, I had brought her out of the house, we looked at the contrails and it was obvious that they were not normal. So as a result we started doing a little research. You were called at the elephant in the sky, I mean everybody on the planet is looking up and seeing this kind of spraying going on. I became involved in weather modification analysis due to my background as a weather observer in the United States Air Force. As I was looking at the jet clouds in the sky, I realized that that's certainly not normal. So I've been watching these abnormal clouds for a long time. Well I started to learn about geoengineering just in a very personal way. I decided to leave Washington in 1998. I bought a small property in a farming community in Tennessee and I still had business in Washington and so I would drive back and forth between Tennessee and Washington. But I was also driving around the country, networking with a variety of people trying to understand what was going on in the economy. And as I was driving around I saw the spring and literally you had planes, criss-crossing and very unusual patterns. Backing, they fly back and forth and you get this tapestry of criss-cross spring that would just hang in the sky for a long time. As an investment person you're adding it up in your mind, you know, okay we have two planes over this county flying this many hours and spraying this much stuff. This is very expensive. Who's paying for this? And I was doing a lot of research at the time on a great deal of money that was going missing from the federal government on a covert basis. On one hand you have all this money going missing on the other hand you have this fantastically expensive spring program going on. The ongoing global climate engineering operations must be considered a new Manhattan project on a scale that is almost inconceivable. Governments all over the globe are either actively or passively participating in the ongoing climate engineering insanity all for their own reasons. All in the attempt to keep business as usual until the last possible moment. Geoengineering is occurring. It's been occurring. It is not new and your tax dollars are funding this. Well, my name is Kristen Megan Edwards. I am a U.S. Air Force veteran. I served nine years on active duty working in bi-environmental engineering. Upon my separation, which was honorably I went and worked with a VA in the Veterans Health Administration as an industrial hygienist and environmental specialist. So as an industrial hygienist, my job was to protect people from such things as heavy carcinogenic metals and hazardous materials. And through that all items that came on base was approved through what is called an Air Force Form 3952. And that is a hazardous materials acquisition. So in order for a chemical to be brought on base, it had to be tied to a specific task. If people were painting aircraft, we knew where that paint was going and what it was being used for. And this was all for liability. So when you start to find constituents coming on the base that you're trying to remove from the base and engineer out through different industrial processes, that was a red flag for me and really told me to do my own research. I've offered one or with the large amount of people in all branches of the military who work in an environmental facet, why they aren't coming forward. I don't think a lot of people are connecting the dots. I wouldn't have stumbled upon why these constituents were being brought on base unless I had heard about Geoengineering. So a lot of times I think people are supporting an operation but haven't really seen outside information to tie it to why this is going on. To see how much taxpayer dollars are used in military operations, whether they're peacetime or wartime. To see how much money is spent to reduce hazards, again that affect human health and impact the environment. It's a complete contradiction to Geoengineering using wartime exemptions to not be cited through the EPA. This is a huge waste. This is fraud and waste from the US government. And that this is allowed to go onto me is unbelievable. I think it's one of the most dangerous, diabolical things that has ever happened to us. It's the most dangerous thing, sure of a nuclear cataclysm. So I take it very, very seriously and will do everything I can to try and expose the problem and encourage people to do likewise. When I was growing up I was really a fan of Kurt Vonnegut and Kurt wrote some remarkable works. And I later learned that most of the fodder for that work came from the work of his brother, Bernard Vonnegut, who was a scientist at the GE under Irving Langmier, the lead scientist there. That work was focused on the production of ice crystals that elevated temperature using a compound called silver iodide. I would like to take you into the laboratory and show you a few of the experiments that led us to our outdoor experiments and converting clouds into snow. These are some which I photographed that were formed in the laboratory. This is the picture of the first time that we've seated back last November. Putting dry ice from a small dispenser in the bottom of the plane under many conditions of course, both like snowstorms will be produced in this way. Nature at last has permitted to do a little something about the weather. These were something that scientists had worked on developed through the 1940s, 50s and 60s and were likely being deployed even today. The research done by Vonnegut and Langmier coincided with changes in our sky. As these programs or at least this type of research increased, the skies started to change. My first real observation of those changes and real awareness of it came. I was looking up and saw patterns, skies of these trails that were being laid out by planes, then developing into confluent layers that would drift perhaps hundreds of miles, changes the weather, changes the temperature around you, also the light intensity and the quality of light was changing. It was funny that there was not really a lot of published literature on this material. There had been some governmental reports that I had dug into. There was some evidence that this type of research was being conducted. And in fact there was a presentation that was given where Dane Wigginson asked some questions about the materials that they were discussing and their possible role in weather modification programs. The image of quality studies including from the Carb California Air Quality Resource Board have named Submicron Size Particularly Harmful for human respiration. Through all these discussions today, I have not heard any mention of this fallout and has this been studied and also the effects of a highly reactive metal like aluminum on toxifying soils and waters. The question is what would be the effects of these materials on human health that came down to the stratosphere environment in particular small particles of aluminum. In our final model we looked at how much additional acid rain acid spoon you would get from the sulfur coming out of the stratosphere. It was a very heavy heat and it rated 5 megattones per year or can make a tons of pre-herb of sulfate. And it turns out that amount is so much smaller than what humans put into the stratosphere on an annual basis by putting fossil fuels as a black product. Even in pristine areas, so it would have a very bad effect on the carbon dioxide and it wouldn't be harmful. So the collaborators in my work on the aerosol scheme are actually both on hard to melt with focus on human health impacts. And while we haven't polished it, that was the very first thing we did. It was due to where magnitude calculation leveled as a paper, but with an expert on human health impacts, but what it could be issued. And the answer is no clear cut notes. So for the numbers of particles of the recording the stratosphere are so tiny compared to low-games of human health. There are other things that really a lot like the dryness particles of the upper troposphere might affect high-clouds. And for aluminum or under particles there are a lot of toxicological things that you can look at seriously. But if you just think about the sheer number of particles, then if you come human health impacts, small particles, the answers, what we have published it, that was the first thing we wrote down was some of the leading experts who do have a video-logical research on human health impacts and it's not even close to you. So 10 million tons of aluminum, ducted the atmosphere will have no human health impacts. So that would be more careful here. We're separating out from toxicological, but so the aluminum we've all been begun to research and published nothing. The question I was asking was about purely about particle numbering. So what we did is we said, we've looked at some global estimates now we have of aerosol global estimates that were built for a logical person. So we said, we added on top of that what we're doing for the stressor care results could have had any impact. The answer is that that was trophy-wealth. But that was just one particle number. We haven't done anything serious on the limit of that. And so there could be something terrible before we have it. So after I saw that footage, I contacted Dang and I started asking him some questions myself because I was interested in what he knew already. I mean he was very forthcoming with all types of information. I realized that he had published a lot of material online and I started perusing that material. And I found that he was digging at something where there was again a lack of available scientific evidence and that's where I became quite interested in contributing in any way that I could. I then working further with Dang and with great thanks to our contributors was able to take a number of flights where we could sample through these condensation trails or these confluent layers that had been laid out earlier in the day. So on the first sampling mission, we started at the Baltimore Washington International Airport. The University of Maryland has a twin engine sessna that is a flying laboratory. It has a sampling nozzle at the front of the plane that collects air samples prior to any contact with the plane or the engines or anything behind. Those samples are then taken through a tube, passed through a filter cassette and these filters are glass fiber filters that are pretty large pore space filters that do effectively capture ground pollution. So PM 2.5, those particle sizes are 2.5 microns and they've done a really good job of it. But it's not really the proper equipment to completely evaluate the number of particles that might be smaller than that. Then we're talking 10 to 100 times smaller than the PM 2.5 particles. But those do capture some of them and we flew in an air controlled zone and basically flew big circles trying to get the altitude but the control towers wouldn't actually allow us to reach the altitude that we needed. They basically want you to pass through that zone. The second flight that we conducted was flown from BWI to Albany International Airport. All right, we're just in pre-flight here. This morning we witnessed, we observed emissions from several planes, several high-outfield planes, flying between 25 and some of the 40,000 feet. And the trails that we left behind these planes spread out into a concrete layer and the low angle of the sun in the morning allowed for us to observe the polarizing effects of those particles using simple polarizing lenses. We could see these obvious patterns that were being laid out in the sky. We were really thankful for the opportunity to be able to get up to altitude that we could observe these materials and sample that cloud layer. Our intention was to do a point-to-point sampling mission where we could actually reach altitude approaching 20,000 feet. Unfortunately on our flight from BWI to Albany the layer that we observed was at 27,000 feet and I think we made it to about 23,000 feet perhaps and so we were below that constant layer that we observed. We landed, had lunch, they refueled the plane. We have two blanks of control samples, one was taken prior to the flight, one was taken after the flight. So we should have again two blank samples and actually three samples on a set, one at level flight and then slight descent from 17,000 to 21,000 and then change the filter and filter to another sample, a third sample as we descended. And then on the return mission though we noticed that that cloud layer had descended from 25 or 27,000 feet to about 17,000 feet. So we could easily reach through that and we sampled below the cloud layer and I'm saying cloud, I mean an induced cloud layer, we sampled through that constant layer and above it. The basic building blocks of climate engineering or to saturate the atmosphere with electrically conductive light scattering particles and polymers, particles like aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese. These particles are then manipulated with extraordinarily powerful radio frequency microwave transmissions. Transmissions that can heat the upper layers of the atmosphere like the ionosphere that are used to create pressure zones that steer upper level wind currents which then steer weather systems. These particulates when they are manipulated with these frequencies can literally move air masses. This is an integral part of climate engineering that is not known or being acknowledged by many, extraordinarily powerful and dangerous radio frequency microwave transmissions. Electromagnetic fields are energy sources and they're going to be interacting with moisture in the air or our bodies or whatever and therefore it's not at all surprising that you're going to find some movement in relation to exposure of weather patterns to electromagnetic fields. When you have things like harp that can send electromagnetic waves into the air column, if you send lower frequencies you can calm it all down and you can cool it or you can excite it and you can heat it up. So there's complete control of temperature within the environment. In 1985 Bernard Iszlal applied for patents many claim that these patents have become the blueprint for harp, high frequency active auroral research program. Harp is a large antenna where we beam radio frequency energy up into the upper atmosphere. Applications discussed in the patents included destroying missiles. Communications control and disruption were included. There were some other ideas both to possibly modify weather. What we can do with an antenna is change the portion of the sky into which we insert the energy. Harp's combined antennae generate a focused beam watt high frequency radio beam which penetrates the lower ionosphere and interacts with the currents of the auroral electrode yet. In certain applications to military acknowledges that it can literally lift the ionosphere and what they say is it's not a problem. It's a short period of time. Yet when you lift the ionosphere up the lower atmosphere rushes in and fills that void which changes localized weather patterns. And its biggest size suggested. If you beamed it for an hour and a half that would equal the energy in a hydrogen bottle. Harp is only one installation of perhaps a hundred that are on that scale around the globe. You can create high pressure domes. In the northern hemisphere that creates a clockwise spin just like the pulley. That allows them to steer the upper level winds into nearly any configuration they wish. So the areas that are under that high pressure dome fry they fry. Take a look at that round bubble. Is that not telling? That's a high pressure dome. It's hard right over the top of us that ensures nothing, nothing can flow in. You would never see this meteorologically 20 years ago. Never. When you have two things that have the same mechanism of action. One would expect that their effects would be either additive or more than additive that being synergistic. So we're talking about weather patterns. So you have fog, you have water droplets, you have water in the air. When those water droplets are radiated with microwaves they're going to do the same thing they do in our body. They're going to generate reactive oxygen species. And when nanoparticles are in that water they're going to do the same thing they do in our body. They're going to generate reactive oxygen species. So at minimum one would expect that these effects would be additive with the possibility that could be more than additive. And if frequencies do that to particulates, again what's it doing to us? What's it doing to the web of life given anything that's alive has water in it. In some form or another what's happening to us with this? And watch what happens to a flow of water when it's exposed to frequency. Very hard to believe and when you feel that with particulates the effect is even more profound. There's a radio frequency transmitter that based on the signal transmission direction is isolating precipitation and blocking out a whole section of precipitation. These are one of the radio frequency transmitters and they're being put up all over the country all over the world wherever the grid power will support them. Again you saw the radio frequency transmission carving out a 90 degree inside corner. That's the overall effect in the end. Completely natural there's not a meteorologist that doesn't know this is going on. No chance. Many ask this question can cyclones, can hurricanes be manipulated? The short answer is yes. Project Syrus. The US military has been engaged in hurricane manipulation programs since at least 1947. And these programs have been ongoing ever since the US military denies it. They claim they stopped this research that is a blatant lie. Juner-June Washington or his captured film footage of the radio frequency transmissions being used to manipulate the atmospheric particulates sprayed by climate engineering operations in order to steer and direct hurricanes. They can be manipulated to a degree that few can comprehend. We have NASA satellite images available at Juner-June Washington or that show extraordinary atmospheric manipulation off the west coast of Africa were cyclones in the Atlantic basin originate. There's no theory, there's no hypothesis, there's no conjecture. Cyclone manipulation is absolutely positively being done. Some of this technology actually came out of the stealth program. Stealth was the idea that you would try to reduce the amount of radar energy that would be reflected off of an aircraft. You could put particles of metal into the paint itself. These particles would then absorb the energy. But if you put that up into the air and then your broadcast is signal that is tuned to the exact frequency that matches the size. And this is the key, all of these particles are the same exact size so they respond to a specific frequency. So when you transmit this frequency you can get all those particles to heat up. And if that mass of air has moisture in it, any kind of humidity at all, it all rises and expands. So this is how you can actually generate a weather system. A primary aspect of climate engineering is the climate engineer's ability to manufacture winter weather with patented processes of chemical ice nucleation for weather modification. In doing so they can seed cloud moisture with what is termed endothermic reacting elements, energy absorbing elements that create a cold dense layer of air that sinks to the surface of the planet and creates a shallow layer of cold perhaps a few hundred feet thick. That creates the illusion of winter weather on a planet that's in total meltdown. So the surface temperatures aren't fact very cold sometimes astoundingly cold but it's a shallow surface layer. Manufacturing winter weather events that are then sensationalized by corporate media, dividing the population again, confusing them as to the true state of the planet and the true temperatures on planet Earth. They have focused often times on particular regions like in 2014 in Boston on the east coast of the US creating snowstorm after snowstorm after snowstorm with chemically nucleated moisture and creating sensationalized headlines from that event. 100 million Americans have been hit by a winter storm packing pretty much everything in the weather arsenal. And convincing much of the population that there was nothing wrong with the climate, that there was in fact record cold in some places. And thus in places where there was record warmth even during winter months people tend to ignore that. As the planetary warming becomes a runaway event, the chemical ice nucleation elements that have been seeded into cloud moisture reach the surface before freezing. Thus so-called frozen rain and ice storms are increasingly becoming the norm. How many know of the ice balls showing up on the shores of Lake Michigan covering beaches, often 75 pounds or more occurring at times on water that is 40 degrees plus Fahrenheit? How does that happen from chemical ice nucleation? This is nothing short of winter weather warfare complete with destructive ice accumulations from the chemical ice nucleation cloud seeding and dangerously slick snow-like frozen material that contains surfactants. They're used in climate engineering chemical ice nucleation cloud seeding operations in order to reduce particle coagulation i.e. to keep the climate engineering elements from sticking together and forming larger particulates that would sink faster to the planet, which would not be conductive to the winter weather warfare scenario. The cryosphere earth's ice deposits are melting at a pace that is unprecedented in the geologic past. The true magnitude of the planetary meltdown has been masked by statistical falsification. The climate engineers have attempted to hide this fact from populations. In order to mask the true severity of polar meltdown from populations, the climate engineers have utilized methods of sea surface ice nucleation. The effect of these operations can easily be distinguished on satellite images. The paradox with sea surface ice nucleation is this. The climate engineers are actually putting a lid or a cap on oceans that are already too warm for natural ice nucleation to occur. In doing so, the climate engineers are, in effect, sealing the heat in the oceans, thus increasing the overall heating of the planet. It's another larger specimen of black oak. It's mid-February. It's already leafing out. It's two months ahead of when it should be leafing out. The leaves last fall, stayed on the trees, and in late November, when a certain series of rains comes, we've seen this the last four years. All the leaves on the deciduous trees wad up dead, but still hang on the tree as you see lower down on this tree, that's what we have. It appears to us as if some sort of defolient is included in the aerosol spray mix, and we know fruit farmers have been using this type of method to cause their orchards to go dormant for years. This is because the temperatures have been rising so progressively. Defolience removes the foliage or leaves from the plant. A week after defoliation spraying, the plants stand dry and almost leafless. Defoliation. A maneuver designed to peel back the cover from which the Vietcong spring ambushes on a large supply convoys and troop movements. Decomposition of forced-floor duff, the materials on the forest floor, leaves, pine needles, twigs and sticks, is now almost nonexistent. The soil microbiome has been devastated. The root systems of trees and forced-floor are dying off just as the crowns of the trees are also dying off. Climate engineering contamination is not only killing soil microorganisms, it is also causing trees to shut down nutrient uptake, which in turn initiates a slow, protracted death of the forest. Because of earth collapsing ozone layer, intense UV radiation is causing the stomata, the respiratory ports of trees to shut down. Thus trees don't respite. They can't feed. They're simply dormant. The forest no longer smells like a forest because the trees are not breathing. Even during the spring and summer months, an increasing number of trees are growthless. What we are left with is stagnant, silent, dry, dead and dying forests that are just a spark away from total incineration. Every single person that I've talked to so far has made the mention that I don't know why it's doing what it's doing. It's burning differently. It's burning more aggressive than it has in years past. And I know we say that every year, but it's unprecedented. It's burning in every direction all at the same time. The single greatest factor that is treating the conditions for the unprecedented wildfires all over the globe is climate engineering. Why? Because climate engineering is disrupting the hydrological cycle, IE the rain cycle. Climate engineering is destroying ozone layer, which is bombarding forests with incredibly intense UV radiation, killing it from the top down. Climate engineering is ionizing the atmosphere, making it more electrically conductive. And this in turn facilitates more dry lightning igniting yet more fires. Climate engineering is blanketing forest foliage and forest forests with a highly incendiary dust, aluminum nanoparticles, barium, polymers. This further adds to the flammability of the forests. From every conceivable direction, climate engineering is the single greatest causal factor in regard to the epic forest fires that are consuming forests all over the globe. The equilibrium of our planet has been completely obliterated. And there are now feedback loops that have been triggered as many as 50. It means once you knock a domino over, that domino knocks over a larger domino and still a larger domino. And the process continues and that is now occurring on planet Earth. And now we have methane releasing from formerly frozen methane hydrate deposits all over the globe in Siberian Tundra on the Arctic seafloor. Methane is escaping, rising into the atmosphere and covering the planet like a layer of glass. Methane over a 10-year time horizon is from 100 to 120 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas. There is enough methane in these deposits to turn our planet into Venus many times over and it is releasing now in climate engineering in the attempts to mask what is unfolding as actually further fueled the process. Climate engineering alters up or level wind currents, that in turn alters ocean currents. Now we have warm water pumping into the Arctic in places it should not be causing massive methane blowouts that have to be seen to be believed. They can be seen when they occur on terrestrial areas like the Siberian Tundra. Massive craters that look like something from a massive nuclear war. The question is that people should be asking is if this is going on, why is nobody talking about it? Under the security classifications that a program can have directed upon it, it can keep it in a narrow vein and keep transparency away totally, absolutely. And the same can be with the contractors and subcontractors that work on the same program that is to be expected. Any contractor that deals with a classified program will be as compartmentalized as the government program offices. That's the whole purpose, the ground rules are the same. In fact you can't even bring that home and talk about it with your family or your friends or other work parties that are not also cleared on that specific program, whatever program that is. You only are told what you need to know. And so they assume that most people don't need to know anything and the rest to warm and know a little bit except the people were pulling the strings. Many ask why environmental groups are not addressing the climate engineering issue. They appear to be more concerned about protecting their 501C3 nonprofit than they are about protecting the environment. And ignoring and obfuscating the truth about verifiable sources of damage to the environment is not protection. This is total betrayal. It's the same fraudulent behavior we see from every large corporation on the planet towing the line for the power structure while decimating the entire biosphere in the process. Turning two blind eyes to this situation will not save us from the reality of the near term impact we are facing. Here's the bottom line. There can be no legitimate discussion about the climate or the state of the climate without first and foremost including the climate engineering issue. We do not have political representation for anybody being interested in saving this planet and that is something I cannot understand. There is an ever increasing unhealthy cooperation between really all of the major media and the forces behind the scenes that are responsible for the environmental destruction. So many people tried to deny that these programs could be occurring because they claim if they were occurring there would be people lining up to blow the whistle. And that is so utterly and totally false when we know that with modern day surveillance every word that anybody of significance says is recorded somewhere by someone. And when we know what happens to whistleblowers like Julian Assange, why would anyone line up to put their own neck on the block to blow the whistle on these types of programs knowing that it will at minimum destroy their life? Even though half the pages were blanked out completely and others partially the fact that they provided me this information and acknowledged yes they were aware it's geoengineering, they were aware they do it was happening and they were monitoring and part of it in that respect. So it's happening no doubt about it. If these programs weren't any since benevolence, why would there be an illegal federal gag order right now on all national weather service and all no employees, the nation's weatherman and illegal federal gag order? Well that should tell you right away that all of this is happening at a really high level obviously. So they won't take questions on it, they feed us, be us information on what's going on. The people that are telling us what we ought to be doing are leading us astray and there needs to be a come up and send a really good investigation of what's going on. If you look at the total wealth that we can create on planet earth, if we create a financial system which supports life and is an alignment with life, what I will tell you is our current financial wealth is less than one percent of what's possible. We don't have economic problems on planet earth, we have a political problem but the economy is so sub optimized and that's because there is this force controlling it from top down. So whatever is going on, I say tell the people because you know the people can deal with it and the people can whatever problem there is they can deal with it or they can solve it. So I'm big on transparency and I know if enough people push for enough transparency we can figure it out. I'm going to strange substance found by Southwest Arkansas man be part of a government test. They've been used well the investigation reporter Jeff Ferrell shows us the result of testing we had done about what's in our skies. They begin as normal contrails from a jet engine but do not fade away like a normal contrail. KSLA News 12 had the sample tested at a lab. The results a high level of barium, 6.8 parts per million more than three times the toxic level set by the EPA. We're just about ready to go into the clean room facility. We will be looking at the samples by scanning electron microscopy. Scan electron microscopy will provide information about part of the size distribution. We will be able to get some elemental analysis. What really this technique is for is to prioritize our samples for downstream, more advanced imaging, more high resolution imaging especially by transmission electron microscopy. Put on a fresh pair of gloves. We're going to start with sample number 8. This is a blank that was collected on the return flight. No flow for food is filtered so this filter should be free of any particulates. I'm going to use these scissors and force ups that have been cleansed with isopropanol and acetone. I'm quite free with these. It does a free cloth. These are the series of samples that we're interested in. These are samples number 9, 10 and 11. These were taken on the return flight where they plane pass through and induce the cloud layer. Number 10, I believe, is the one that was passed through a cloud layer head around some of the between 17 and 19 thousand. There will take time to cleanse the instruments between each sample. We're going sample number 9, the middle center. Opening it to ensure that the surface that had received the particulates is facing upward. Number 9 is completed. Now, I'm power to see sample number 10. One additional sample, this blank sample was taken after the plane landed in the free of the samples containing actual air flow. We have one prior to emission and one prior to emission. Prior to imaging, these samples are coated with a thin layer of platinum. The platinum helps to take the excess charge or electrons and drain them off to the stubble. Now, I'll do these samples where we passed through the cloud layer. A few little bright particles. This particle here is probably the one that will do the most analysis on. The general image that we're seeing now are the glass fibers from the glass fiber filter itself. The bright particles are bright areas that we see. Our areas operating in the so-called backscatter mode of this microscope collects electrons that are backscattered especially from the middle center compounds. We can clearly see the lighter and darker areas there, such as aggregate. Some of the smaller particles in here we're looking at on the order of about 450 nanometers long. But there's also smaller particles in there too. So backscattered electrons typically the higher the atomic number, the brighter the signal. That being said, what we will do is look for the bright spots and then analyze those. The glass itself does seem to have sodium in it. Looks like aluminum, sodium, silicon, calcium, potassium. The reason that caught my eye is because it's darker than everything else. It's got lots of small particles in it. This gives us a lot of information. Again, it identifies which filters have qualitatively more materials. Just, you know, basically we see more material on it. It also gives us information about size of particles and potential for aggregates that we might be dealing with in the samples. Barium sulfide again? So barium sulfide is interesting. What he's doing now is just getting a high resolution image of it to see if this is indeed a single particle or if there's any evidence that there's an aggregate of smaller particles. So really the big standout in this one seems to be iron. In this field we have one, one there, two, three, four. And I did analysis on all of them. They all seem to be pretty similar in composition. Well, this is definitely made up of much smaller particles. So this may be a clump of which we're talking about. We just analyzed three different areas. This particle seems to be high in aluminum. It's a large plate. And this has some silver too. In terms of now the aluminum signatures that we're getting from the glass fibers themselves. This is much bigger. So look at that. That's the aluminum. Easily 3x the silicon. And I think the silicon aluminum were pretty similar in the glass. So here if you look at just the glass fiber, silicon is significantly taller than aluminum. So that particle there is mostly aluminum. So measuring this one right here, this is below 70 nanometers. Right. Good. In the precipitation samples that we've seen in the past, the aluminum oxide particles that we've been seeing are the order of 40 to 60 nanometers. So that's consistent with the size that we've seen from precipitation events. Again, these samples were collected directly from the air. There's not a lot of approaches or instrumentation that you can use to observe these nanomaterials. I mean, again, these are the sizes of viruses. And so really the only equipment or instrumentation that is appropriate for identifying these materials is a high resolution transmission electronic microscopy. This allows us not only to determine the size of the particles, we can also determine the composition using a technique called elemental dispersive spectroscopy. It's done within this large microscope. So we'll give us information about the morphology of the particles, the composition of the particles, and we can actually see the crystalline spacing. So the spaces of the crystals themselves. So we are talking high resolution microscopic techniques that are really the only way to be able to observe these directly. The morphology is important because the productions of these materials are really of a constrained size range. And we've seen this already in samples that we've analyzed from other sources. American element produces lots of these nanomaterials. And you can actually purchase them online. The size distribution of these engineered particles are quite homogeneous. So yeah. It's like it was a moon. A moon. Now what I've done is tell it to calibrate to the moon. So that what it's doing is going through each of its process times and each of its gain values to calibrate. I can tell you this much. What I'm seeing right now is the far superior to the last time I've ever had an illustration. So you see you got two calcium, right? K alpha, K beta. This variant of the... This is probably an L1M. Here's your major variant. And then you have the other correct variants, triple puncture. Definitely. Oh yeah. The significance of the results is that to my knowledge is the first evidence of nanomaterials collected directly from the emissions of aircrafts. This is the first time that this has been reported or acknowledged. There is aluminum and there is aluminum. And so the way the people are involved in the destruction of our beautiful planet, the get away with it is because the crust of the earth consists of aluminum silicate. Although traces of aluminum may be found in almost any soil, only those clays containing 50 or 60% aluminum ore, and known as boxite, are mined for commercial production. And so the argument is always where we always had aluminum in the system and our body knows how to deal with it. Well, there's a difference between creating nanoparticles of aluminum which do not exist in nature, which is a highly aggressive material that is seeking to chemically react with other things. The chemical process reaches its climax in these huge tanks where aluminum is precipitated out of the ore in caustic solution. Later the water content is driven off by baking in giant rotary kills, resulting in this pure snow white powder known as aluminum. And ever increasing amount of this aluminum is being used in chemical processing in soil conditioners, i